DOCSLIB.ORG

Citharinidae Günther, 1864 - Lutefishes [=Cyprinosalmi, Citharinina] Notes: Cyprinosalmi Latreille, 1825:120 [Ref

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Citharinidae Günther, 1864 - Lutefishes [=Cyprinosalmi, Citharinina] Notes: Cyprinosalmi Latreille, 1825:120 [Ref FAMILY Citharinidae Günther, 1864 - lutefishes [=Cyprinosalmi, Citharinina] Notes: Cyprinosalmi Latreille, 1825:120 [ref. 31889] (tribe) Citharinus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Citharinina Günther, 1864:279, 302 [ref. 1974] (group) Citharinus GENUS Citharidium Boulenger, 1902 - lutefishes [=Citharidium Boulenger [G. A.], 1902:144] Notes: [ref. 563]. Neut. Citharidium ansorgii Boulenger, 1902. Type by monotypy. •Valid as Citharidium Boulenger, 1902 -- (Géry 1977:58 [ref. 1597], Vari 1979:339 [ref. 5490], Daget 1984:212 [ref. 6170], Gosse in Lévêque et al. 1990:262 [ref. 21589], Poll & Gosse 1995:99 [ref. 24781]). Current status: Valid as Citharidium Boulenger, 1902. Citharinidae. Species Citharidium ansorgii Boulenger, 1902 - Nigerian lutefish (author) [=Citharidium ansorgii Boulenger [G. A.], 1902:144, Pl. 3] Notes: [Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Series 7) v. 9 (no. 50); ref. 563] Lake Oguta, southern Nigeria. Current status: Valid as Citharidium ansorgii Boulenger, 1902. Citharinidae. Distribution: Habitat: freshwater. GENUS Citharinops Daget, 1962 - lutefishes [=Citharinops (subgenus of Citharinus) Daget [J.], 1962:81, 101] Notes: [ref. 1024]. Masc. Citharinus distichodoides Pellegrin, 1919. Type by monotypy. See also Daget & Iltis 1965:83 (footnote) [ref. 13626]. •Valid as Citharinops Daget, 1962 -- (Daget 1984:212 [ref. 6170], Gosse in Lévêque et al. 1990:262 [ref. 21589], Poll & Gosse 1995:99 [ref. 24781], Dankwa et al. 1999:24 [ref. 28023]). Current status: Valid as Citharinops Daget, 1962. Citharinidae. Species Citharinops distichodoides (Pellegrin, 1919) - Gribingui lutefish (author) [=Citharinus distichodoides Pellegrin [J.], 1919:208, Citharinus thomasi Pellegrin [J.], 1924:461] Notes: [Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France v. 44; ref. 15224] Gribingui River, Congo. Current status: Valid as Citharinops distichodoides (Pellegrin, 1919). Citharinidae. Distribution: Africa. Habitat: freshwater. (thomasi) [Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Série 1) v. 30 (no. 6); ref. 15561] Koriome, near Timbouctou, Niger River, Mali, western Africa. Current status: Synonym of Citharinops distichodoides (Pellegrin, 1919). Citharinidae. Habitat: freshwater. GENUS Citharinus Cuvier, 1816 - lutefishes [=Citharinus Cuvier [G.], 1816:168, Citharinoides (subgenus of Citharinus) Daget [J.], 1962:83] Notes: [ref. 993]. Masc. Serrasalmus citharus Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 1809. Type by monotypy. Spelled Cytharinus by Oken (ex Cuvier):1182 [ref. 3303]. •Valid as Citharinus Cuvier, 1816 -- (Daget 1962 [ref. 1024], Géry 1977:55 [ref. 1597], Vari 1983:5 [ref. 5419], Daget 1984:213 [ref. 6170], Lévêque et al. 1989:116 [ref. 26480], Paugy & Bénech 1989:301 [ref. 26478], Gosse in Lévêque et al. 1990:265 [ref. 21589], Poll & Gosse 1995:99 [ref. 24781], Dankwa et al. 1999:24 [ref. 28023]). Current status: Valid as Citharinus Cuvier, 1816. Citharinidae. (Citharinoides) [ref. 1024]. Masc. Citharinus latus Müller & Troschel, 1845. Not available from Daget 1962, described with 2 included species without type fixation after 1930 (Art. 13.3); made available and dates to Daget & Iltis 1965:83 (footnote) [ref. 13626] where type was designated. •Treated as a synonym of Citharinus Cuvier, 1816 -- (Daget 1984:213 [ref. 6170]). Current status: Synonym of Citharinus Cuvier, 1816. Citharinidae. Species Citharinus citharus (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1809) - moonfish [=Serrasalmus citharus Geoffroy St. Hilaire [E.], 1809:[218], Pl. 5 (figs. 2-3), Citharinus geoffroei Cuvier [G.], 1829:313, Citharinus citharus intermedius Worthington [E. B.], 1932:123, Distichodus marnoi Steindachner [F.], 1881:200 [22]] Notes: [Poissons du Nil v. 1 (part 1); ref. 4182] Nile River, Egypt. Current status: Valid as Citharinus citharus (Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 1809). Citharinidae. Distribution: Africa. Habitat: freshwater. (geoffroei) [Le Règne Animal (Edition 2) v. 2; ref. 995] Current status: Synonym of Citharinus citharus (Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 1809). Citharinidae. Habitat: freshwater. (intermedius) [The Journal of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology v. 38 (no. 258); ref. 16405] Lake Rudolf [Lake Turkana], Kenya. Current status: Synonym of Citharinus citharus (Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 1809). Citharinidae. Habitat: freshwater. (marnoi) [Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe v. 83 (1. Abth.); ref. 4231] Bahr-el-Seraf and Bahr-el-Gebel, Nile system, Sudan. Current status: Synonym of Citharinus citharus (Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 1809). Citharinidae. Habitat: freshwater. Species Citharinus congicus Boulenger, 1897 - Boyoma lutefish (author) [=Citharinus congicus Boulenger [G. A.], 1897:424] Notes: [Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Series 6) v. 20 (no. 119) (art. 50); ref. 14629] Stanley [Boyoma] Falls, Upper Congo River, Democratic Republic of Congo. Current status: Valid as Citharinus congicus Boulenger, 1897. Citharinidae. Distribution: Habitat: freshwater. Species Citharinus eburneensis Daget, 1962 - Comoe lutefish (author) [=Citharinus eburneensis Daget [J.], 1962:485] Notes: [Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Série 2) v. 33 (no. 5) (1961); ref. 9307] Upper Comoé, Ivory Coast. Current status: Valid as Citharinus eburneensis Daget, 1962. Citharinidae. Distribution: West Africa. Habitat: freshwater. Species Citharinus gibbosus Boulenger, 1899 - Leopold lutefish (author) [=Citharinus gibbosus Boulenger [G. A.], 1899:94, Pl. 39] Notes: [Annales du Musee du Congo (Ser. Zoology) v. 1 (fasc. 4); ref. 549] Stanley Pool; Kutu, Lake Leopold II; Monsembé, Upper Congo; Banana; Tanganyika. Current status: Valid as Citharinus gibbosus Boulenger, 1899. Citharinidae. Distribution: Africa. Habitat: freshwater Species Citharinus latus Muller & Troschel, 1844 - Nile lutefish (author) [=Citharinus latus Müller [J.] & Troschel [F. H.] (ex Ehrenberg), 1844:85] Notes: [Archiv für Naturgeschichte v. 10 (pt 1); ref. 3070] Nile River, Egypt. Current status: Valid as Citharinus latus Müller & Troschel, 1844. Citharinidae. Distribution: Habitat: freshwater. Species Citharinus macrolepis Boulenger, 1899 - Boma lutefish (author) [=Citharinus macrolepis Boulenger [G. A.], 1899:93, Pl. 38] Notes: [Annales du Musee du Congo (Ser. Zoology) v. 1 (fasc. 4); ref. 549] Boma; Manyanga; Upoto; Chiloango; Crocodile River; Kutu; Ibali, Lake Leopold Island. Current status: Valid as Citharinus macrolepis Boulenger, 1899. Citharinidae. Distribution: Habitat: freshwater ********************************************************************* Unavailable names, uncertain taxa cyprinoides, Salmo Cuvier [G.] 1829:313 [Le Règne Animal (Edition 2) v. 2; ref. 995] No locality. No types known. On Gronovius, Mus. Ich. p. 378. Noted in account of genus Citharinus. •Objectively invalid; preoccupied by Salmo cyprinoides Linnaeus 1766 and Salmo cyprinoides Pallas 1814. Citharinidae. Habitat: freshwater..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Speciose Family Characidae
    Oliveira et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:275 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/275 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Phylogenetic relationships within the speciose family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes) based on multilocus analysis and extensive ingroup sampling Claudio Oliveira1*, Gleisy S Avelino1, Kelly T Abe1, Tatiane C Mariguela1, Ricardo C Benine1, Guillermo Ortí2, Richard P Vari3 and Ricardo M Corrêa e Castro4 Abstract Background: With nearly 1,100 species, the fish family Characidae represents more than half of the species of Characiformes, and is a key component of Neotropical freshwater ecosystems. The composition, phylogeny, and classification of Characidae is currently uncertain, despite significant efforts based on analysis of morphological and molecular data. No consensus about the monophyly of this group or its position within the order Characiformes has been reached, challenged by the fact that many key studies to date have non-overlapping taxonomic representation and focus only on subsets of this diversity. Results: In the present study we propose a new definition of the family Characidae and a hypothesis of relationships for the Characiformes based on phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences of two mitochondrial and three nuclear genes (4,680 base pairs). The sequences were obtained from 211 samples representing 166 genera distributed among all 18 recognized families in the order Characiformes, all 14 recognized subfamilies in the Characidae, plus 56 of the genera so far considered incertae sedis in the Characidae. The phylogeny obtained is robust, with most lineages significantly supported by posterior probabilities in Bayesian analysis, and high bootstrap values from maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding Discriminates Freshwater Fishes from Southeastern Nigeria and Provides River System-Level Phylogeographic Resoluti
    Mitochondrial DNA, 2011; Early Online: 1–9 DNA barcoding discriminates freshwater fishes from southeastern Nigeria and provides river system-level phylogeographic resolution within some species CHRISTOPHER D. NWANIa, SVEN BECKERb, HEATHER E. BRAIDb, EMMANUEL F. UDEc, OKECHUKWU I. OKOGWUa, & ROBERT HANNERb aDepartment of Applied Biology, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria, bDepartment of Integrative Biology, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, and cFisheries and Aquaculture, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria (Received 17 August 2010; revised 28 October 2010; accepted 28 October 2010) Abstract Background and aims: Fishes are the main animal protein source for human beings and play a vital role in aquatic ecosystems and food webs. Fish identification can be challenging, especially in the tropics (due to high diversity), and this is particularly true for larval forms or fragmentary remains. DNA barcoding, which uses the 50 region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) as a target gene, is an efficient method for standardized species-level identification for biodiversity assessment and conservation, pending the establishment of reference sequence libraries. Materials and methods: In this study, fishes were collected from three rivers in southeastern Nigeria, identified morphologically, and imaged digitally. DNA was extracted, PCR-amplified, and the standard barcode region was bidirectionally sequenced for 363 individuals belonging to 70 species in 38 genera. All specimen provenance data and associated sequence information were For personal use only. recorded in the barcode of life data systems (BOLD; www.barcodinglife.org). Analytical tools on BOLD were used to assess the performance of barcoding to identify species. Results: Using neighbor-joining distance comparison, the average genetic distance was 60-fold higher between species than within species, as pairwise genetic distance estimates averaged 10.29% among congeners and only 0.17% among conspecifics.
    [Show full text]
  • Citharinus Citharus in Anambra River Flood System, Southeastern Nigeria
    American Journal of Agricultural Science 2015; 2(2): 63-69 Published online April 10, 2015 (http://www.aascit.org/journal/ajas) Gut Helminth Parasites of Citharinus citharus in Anambra River Flood System, Southeastern Nigeria Uneke Bilikis Iyabo Fisheries and Hydrobiology, Dept of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria Email address [email protected] Citation Keywords Uneke Bilikis Iyabo. Gut Helminth Parasites of Citharinus citharus in Anambra River Flood Citharinus citharus , System, Southeastern Nigeria. American Journal of Agricultural Science. Prevalence, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2015, pp. 63-69. Gut Helminth Parasites, Procamallanus Laeviconchus, Abstract Cithariniella citharini , A total of forty (40) Citharinus citharus (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1809), order Infection Rate, (Characiformes) and family (Citharinidae) were purchased randomly from local Nigeria fishermen who fished in Anambra River from May to October 2012 and examined for the gut helminth parasites. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations were used for parasite isolation and identification. Ten (25.0%) of the fish examined were infected with the two species of helminth parasites Procamallanus laeviconchus and Cithariniella Received: March 19, 2015 citharini . The parasites were isolated which were restricted to the intestine, except for P. Revised: March 30, 2015 laeviconchus , which was also found in the oesophagus and stomach. P. laeviconchus was Accepted: March 31, 2015 identified in the majority of the fish with a prevalence rate of 15.0% while C. citharini was identified in the minority with an infection rate of 10.0%. The highest prevalence (30.0%) of the helminth infection was recorded in fish with total lengths ranging from 35cm-39.9cm while those with lengths ranging from 20cm-24.9cm recorded the lowest prevalence (11.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • 22 . Cltharlnldae
    22 . ClTHARlNlDAE Jean-Pierre GOSSE La famille des Citharinidae est voisine de celle des Distichodontidae. Elle comprend des Poissons de grande taille au corps haut et comprimé latéralement. CLÉ DES GENRES 1 - Ecailles cténoïdes ; corps marqué de deux larges bandes transversales noires ................ .................................................................................................................. Citharidium - Ecailles cycloïdes ......................................................................................................... 2 2 - Ecailles grandes ; 50 a 56 écailles en ligne longitudinale ; 7 à 8 entre la ligne latérale et la base des ventrales .................................................................................... Cifharinops - Ecailles petites ; plus de 60 écailles en ligne longitudinale ; plus de 12 entre la ligne latérale et la base des ventrales ..................................................................... Citharinus KEY TO THE GENERA 1 - Scales strongly denticulate ; two large oblique blackish bands across the sides ................ .................................................................................................................. Citharidium - Scales cycloid ............................................................................................................. 2 2 - Scales large ; 50 to 56 in longitudinal line ; 7 to 8 between lateral line and ventral fin ............. ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Ecology in Widespread Acoustic Signaling Behavior Across Fishes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.14.296335; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Evolution and Ecology in Widespread Acoustic Signaling Behavior Across Fishes 2 Aaron N. Rice1*, Stacy C. Farina2, Andrea J. Makowski3, Ingrid M. Kaatz4, Philip S. Lobel5, 3 William E. Bemis6, Andrew H. Bass3* 4 5 1. Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, 159 6 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY, USA 7 2. Department of Biology, Howard University, 415 College St NW, Washington, DC, USA 8 3. Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, 215 Tower Road, Ithaca, NY 9 USA 10 4. Stamford, CT, USA 11 5. Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington Street, Boston, MA, USA 12 6. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Cornell University Museum of 13 Vertebrates, Cornell University, 215 Tower Road, Ithaca, NY, USA 14 15 ORCID Numbers: 16 ANR: 0000-0002-8598-9705 17 SCF: 0000-0003-2479-1268 18 WEB: 0000-0002-5669-2793 19 AHB: 0000-0002-0182-6715 20 21 *Authors for Correspondence 22 ANR: [email protected]; AHB: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.14.296335; this version posted September 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Families of Oguta Lake, South Eastern Nigeria, and Sustainability Issues
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Natural Sciences Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3186 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0921 (Online) Vol.4, No.9, 2014 Fish Families of Oguta Lake, South Eastern Nigeria, and Sustainability Issues Amiye Francis 1; Francis David Sikoki 2 and Uchenna Nwabata Agorua 3 1. Dept of Animal Science & Fisheries. Faculty of Agriculture,Univ of Port Harcourt (Uniportt) 2.Dept of Animal and Environmental Biology. Uniport 3.Dept of Fisheries & Marine, Fac of Agric., Imo State Polytechnic, Umuagwo *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Fish species of Oguta Lake were sampled for seven months to acertain present status. The catch consisted of 5 orders, 15 families, 21 genera and 28 species. Bagridae, Characidae, Anabantidae, Citharinidae and Notopteridae were dominant families in terms of numbers; in terms of species, Cichlidae was most dominant ( 5 species). In descending order number of species identified were: three each, for Mormyridae, Characidae and Mochokidae; and a species or two for each of the remaining 11 families, indicating that there could be high risk of complete wipe out of such families under sudden adverse environmental conditions. As a potential source of socio-economic development to surrounding communities the anthropogenic activities on this lake should be defined in order to forestall the gradual and continuous loss of its useful services. The root crop cassava (Manihot sp.) cottage industry can be sited by the lake to stop its direct processing within the lake. Domestic waste should not be dumped directly into the lake as well.
    [Show full text]
  • HANDBOOK of FISH BIOLOGY and FISHERIES Volume 1 Also Available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B
    HANDBOOK OF FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES Volume 1 Also available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B. Hart and John D. Reynolds Volume 2 Fisheries Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries VOLUME 1 FISH BIOLOGY EDITED BY Paul J.B. Hart Department of Biology University of Leicester AND John D. Reynolds School of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia © 2002 by Blackwell Science Ltd a Blackwell Publishing company Chapter 8 © British Crown copyright, 1999 BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148‐5020, USA 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Paul J.B. Hart and John D. Reynolds to be identified as the Authors of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2002 Reprinted 2004 Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data has been applied for. Volume 1 ISBN 0‐632‐05412‐3 (hbk) Volume 2 ISBN 0‐632‐06482‐X (hbk) 2‐volume set ISBN 0‐632‐06483‐8 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Set in 9/11.5 pt Trump Mediaeval by SNP Best‐set Typesetter Ltd, Hong Kong Printed and bound in the United Kingdom by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichthyofauna Diversity of Lake Asejire: Ecological Implications
    Vol. 5(10), pp. 248-252, Oct, 2013 International Journal of Fisheries and DOI: 10.5897/IJFA13.0379 ISSN 1991-637X©2013 Academic Journals Aquaculture http://www.academicjournals.org/IJFA Full length Research paper Ichthyofauna diversity of Lake Asejire: Ecological implications Ipinmoroti, Mabel Omowumi Department of Renewable Resources, College of Agricultural Science, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago–Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria. Accepted 19 August, 2013 The natural diversity of most aquatic systems has witnessed various changes in stock diversity and abundance resulting from structural changes in habitat, food composition and uncontrolled exploitation. These have altered the ecology of the fish resources with the disappearance of some species and dominance of others. This study seeks to identify the ecological implication of the stock diversity and abundance in Lake Asejire. Lake Asejire is a 525 ha man-made lake on river Osun one of the major rivers that drain the western part of Nigeria. Fish samples were collected for a period of 24 months using gillnets of between 25 and 187.5 mm mesh sizes. Data obtained were analyzed using inferential statistics and descriptive analysis of means, frequencies and percentages. Seventeen families identified and grouped into trophic levels. Herbivores were 63.03 and 60.35%; carnivore 31.05 and 30.65% and omnivores were 5.91 and 8.99% by biomass in the first and second year respectively. The herbivores were dominated by the cichlids, heterotis and cyprinids; carnivores by bagrids, characids, channids and Lates while mormyrids, synodonts and clarids constitute the omnivores. Seasons had no effect on the population and number of the carnivores.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the World
    Fishes of the World Fishes of the World Fifth Edition Joseph S. Nelson Terry C. Grande Mark V. H. Wilson Cover image: Mark V. H. Wilson Cover design: Wiley This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be createdor extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 3: Fishery Composition of the Study Area
    Table 3: Fishery composition of the study area S/N Family Common Name Local name (Ogbia) Scientific Name Relative Habitat Fishing areas Peak Period Fishing gear Abundance 1 Anabantidae Tailspot ctenopoma Okolokolo Ctenopoma kingsleyae Common Pelagic Elabio creek August to March fish fence, (Guther,1896) Hook and line 2 Esa Auchenaglanis bicutatus (G. Common Demersal Elabio creek August to March fish fence, Bagridae St. Hilaire,1809) Hook and line 3 Esa Auchenaglanis occidentalis Common Demersal Eferiwo river, August to March Gill net, Cast (Val., 1840 Otuoke river, net Bagridae ) Otuaba river, Abaye water side 4 Bayad Esa Common Demersal Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Bagridae Bagrus bajad (Forskal,1775) Otuaba river, Abaye water side 5 Esa Common Benthopelagic Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Bagrus docmak Bagridae Otuaba river, (Forskal,1775) Abaye water side 6 Esa Common Benthopelagic Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Chrysichthys auratus (G. St. Bagridae Otuaba river, Hilaire,1809) Abaye water side 7 Bagrid catfish Common Benthopelagic Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus Bagridae Otuaba river, (Lacepede, 1803) Abaye water side 8 Widehead catfish Common Benthopelagic Eferiwo river, May to November Gill net, Cast Otuoke river, net Clarotes laticeps Bagridae Otuaba river, (Rupell,1829) Abaye water side 9 Snake-head fish Obolo Parachanna africana Common Demersal Elabio creek May to November
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence Fish Farming in Africa: a Technical Manual
    ACF INTERNATIONAL Subsistence fish farming in Africa: a technical manual Yves FERMON In collaboration with: Aımara Cover photos: Ö Top right: Tilapia zillii - © Anton Lamboj Ö Top left: Pond built by ACF in DRC, 2008 - © François Charrier Ö Bottom: Beneficiaries in front of the pond they have built. Liberia, ASUR, 2006 - © Yves Fermon ii Subsistence fishfarming in Africa Subsistence fishfarming in Africa OBJECTIVES OF THE MANUAL Ö The objective of this manual is to explain how to build facilities that produce ani- mal protein — fish — using minimal natural resources and minimal external supplies. These fish are being produced for the purpose of subsistence. Ö It is possible to produce edible fish in a short time and at a low cost in order to to compensate for a lack of animal protein available in a community and to do so sustai- nably. However, facilities must be adapted to the environmental context. This manual is a guide for: ¾ Program managers and their technical teams; ¾ Managers at headquarters who are monitoring program success. This manual covers: Ö The different stages of starting of a «fish farming» program As soon as teams arrive on the ground, they must evaluate the resources available, the needs of the population, and existing supplies. This assessment is followed by the technical work of ins- talling fish ponds. When this is done, the next stage is to manage and monitor the ponds and the production of fish. Ö Constraints on field workers The determination of whether fish farming is appropriate in a particular location and if so, of which type, will depend upon many environmental variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Catch Selectivity of Four Fishing Gears on the Lower Benue River, Nigeria
    International Journal of Agriculture and Earth Science Vol. 2 No. 3 ISSN 2489-0081 2016 www.iiardpub.org Comparative Catch Selectivity of Four Fishing Gears on the Lower Benue River, Nigeria 1Iorchor S. I., 2B. Otene and 2A. D. I. George 1Department of Fisheries, Akperan Orshi College of Agriculture Yandev, Gboko, Benue State 2Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Environment, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Port Harcourt 1Corresponding Author, Department of Fisheries, Akperan Orshi College of Agriculture Yandev, Gboko, Benue State [email protected], [email protected] Abstract A comparative study on the selectivity of four fishing gears (cast net, dragnet, gill net and Hook and line) was carried out on the stretch of the Benue River between Makurdi and Abinsi fishing ground on the coordinates; 8o 31’N and 7o 35’E. The operation of these gears was observed for two days in a month for twelve months (one year), during which each of their catches was sampled. The 12 months comprised of two seasons (dry and wet seasons). A total number of 5,853 specimens which comprised of 82 species in 22 families were caught during the 12 months of the study (July 2014 – June, 2015). Of the four gears used for the experiment cast net had the highest catch with 2,786 specimens, dragnet ranked second with 1,972 specimens. Gill net recorded 803 specimen and hook and line recorded 292 specimens. The numbers of specimens caught by each gear, in the dry and wet seasons were also noted. A bench mark of 5% of the total catch by each gear was used to determine its species selectivity, the number/spread of each species of fish caught within the above range were regarded as being selective for that gear.
    [Show full text]