Open Lrshapiro Thesis111612.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Lrshapiro Thesis111612.Pdf The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Entomology A to ZYMV GUIDE TO ERWINIA TRACHEIPHILA INFECTION: AN ECOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR STUDY A Dissertation in Entomology by Lori Shapiro 2012 Lori Shapiro Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 The thesis of Lori Shapiro was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark Mescher Assistant Professor of Entomology Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Consuelo De Moraes Professor of Entomology Andy Stephenson Distinguished Professor of Biology and Associate Dean of Graduate Studies Shelby Fleischer Professor of Entomology Eric Harvill Professor of Microbiology and Infectious Disease Gary Felton Head of the Department of Department or Graduate Program *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Many of the most ecologically and economically important diseases of plants are transmitted by insects, and the spread of these diseases ultimately depends on complex interactions among plants, pathogens, and insect vectors. Yet, empirical evidence regarding the mechanisms by which plant pathogens are transmitted by insects is sparse. In this dissertation, I take a systems biology approach to understanding ecological and molecular interactions driving the emergence of the bacterial phytopathogen Erwinia tracheiphila, a microbe with exceptional economic importance and a highly restricted host range. Induced changes in the emission of plant volatiles—airborne chemicals released by plants that serve as key foraging cues for insects but are not well characterized in response to pathogen infection. In the field and greenhouse, I found that E. tracheiphila induced a unique volatile blend from foliage, and caused a reduction in the emission of floral volatiles. The co-occurring viral pathogen Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus suppressed both leaf and floral volatiles. Behavioral assays found these volatile differences had effects on vector attraction and were important for beetle recruitment to E. tracheiphila infected plants and dispersal to healthy ones, and that few beetles were recruited to virus infected plants. Controlled inoculations show that healthy and ZYMV infected plants are equally susceptible to E. tracheiphila infection, and so vector behavior is largely driving lack of coinfection of the two pathogens in the same host plant that is often documented in the field. Next, I developed a qPCR method to clarify uncertainty in rates of E. tracheiphila colonization of beetle vectors exposed by feeding on wilting leaf tissue. I found that E. tracheiphila does not colonize beetles very efficiently: While at least 80% of beetles are exposed to E. tracheiphila at both short (3 hr) and long (24 hr) exposures, the longer exposure results in significantly higher long-term retention rates. Quantitative changes in bacterial titre in frass and whole beetles also show that transmission is not simply mechanical, and that E. tracheiphila exhibits complex colonization dynamics of the iv beetle’s digestive tract characterized by attachment, growth, and shedding phases. Finally, I analyze the genome of E. tracheiphila and find it has undergone extensive recombination and pseudogenization compared to the closest sequenced relative, and contains many putatively horizontally transferred genes. Phylogenetic and comparative data suggest E. tracheiphila is undergoing rapid evolution and may have recently experienced a host jump to squash. Taken together, these studies provide an ecological mechanism for transmission from infected to healthy plants; a quantitative description of how beetles are colonized and consequences for transmission; and a genome analysis hypothesizing factors influencing E. tracheiphila emergence as a squash pathogen and persistently transmitted insect symbiont. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 An Historical Perspective of Cucurbit Research .............................................................. 1 References ........................................................................................................................ 12 Chapter 2 Pathogen effects on vegetative and floral odors mediated vector attraction and host exposure in a complex pathosystem ......................................................................... 18 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 18 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 19 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................... 22 Results .............................................................................................................................. 28 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 35 References ........................................................................................................................ 42 Chapter 3 Direct interactions between a viral pathogen, a bacterial pathogen, and a specialist herbivore in a shared host plant ........................................................................ 45 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 45 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 46 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 48 Results .............................................................................................................................. 52 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 61 References ........................................................................................................................ 64 Chapter 4 Colonization dynamics of an insect vector by a bacterial phytopathogen .............. 67 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 67 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 68 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................... 69 Results .............................................................................................................................. 73 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 81 References ........................................................................................................................ 87 Chapter 5 Comparative genomic insights into emergence and host associations of the bacterial wilt pathogen Erwinia tracheiphila ................................................................... 92 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 92 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 93 vi Results/Discussion ........................................................................................................... 95 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 130 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 132 References ........................................................................................................................ 145 Chapter 6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 152 References ........................................................................................................................ 157 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1. Field foliar volatiles ............................................................................................. 29 Figure 2-2. PCA of field foliar volatiles. ................................................................................ 30 Figure 2-3. Geenhouse foliar volatiles .................................................................................... 31 Figure 2-4. Field floral volatiles. ............................................................................................ 32 Figure 2-5. Greenhouse floral volatiles ................................................................................... 32 Figure 2-6. Beetle attraction
Recommended publications
  • Please Scroll Down for Article
    This article was downloaded by: [USDA National Agricultural Library] On: 1 October 2008 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 790740294] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Biocontrol Science and Technology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713409232 A critical evaluation of host ranges of parasitoids of the subtribe Diabroticina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Luperini) using field and laboratory host records Stefan Toepfer a; Guillermo Cabrera Walsh b; Astrid Eben c; Rebeca Alvarez-Zagoya d; Tim Haye a; Feng Zhang a; Ulrich Kuhlmann a a CABI Europe-Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland b USDA ARS South American Biocontrol Laboratory, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina c Departamento de Ecología Funcional, Instituto de Ecología, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico d Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDR-IPN, Durango, Mexico Online Publication Date: 01 January 2008 To cite this Article Toepfer, Stefan, Cabrera Walsh, Guillermo, Eben, Astrid, Alvarez-Zagoya, Rebeca, Haye, Tim, Zhang, Feng and Kuhlmann, Ulrich(2008)'A critical evaluation of host ranges of parasitoids of the subtribe Diabroticina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Luperini) using field and laboratory host records',Biocontrol Science and Technology,18:5,483 — 504 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/09583150802001742 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583150802001742 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Options for Striped Cucumber Beetle Management in Cucumbers Katie Brandt Grand Valley State University
    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Masters Theses Graduate Research and Creative Practice 6-2012 Organic Options for Striped Cucumber Beetle Management in Cucumbers Katie Brandt Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Brandt, Katie, "Organic Options for Striped Cucumber Beetle Management in Cucumbers" (2012). Masters Theses. 29. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses/29 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research and Creative Practice at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORGANIC OPTIONS FOR STRIPED CUCUMBER BEETLE MANAGEMENT IN CUCUMBERS Katie Brandt A thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Biology June 2012 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to my advisors, who helped me plan this research and understand the interactions of beetles, plants and disease in this system. Jim Dunn helped immensely with the experimental design and prevented me from giving up when my replication block was destroyed in a flood. Mathieu Ngouajio generously shared his expertise with organic vegetables, field trials and striped cucumber beetles. Mel Northup lent the HOBO weather stations, visited the farm to instruct me to set them up and later transferred the data into an Excel spreadsheet. Sango Otieno and the students at the Statistical Consulting Center at GVSU were very helpful with data analysis. Numerous farmworkers and volunteers also helped in the labor-intensive process of gathering data for this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptome Sequencing of the Striped Cucumber Beetle, Acalymma Vittatum (F.), Reveals Numerous Sex-Specific Transcripts and Xenobiotic Detoxification Genes
    Article Transcriptome Sequencing of the Striped Cucumber Beetle, Acalymma vittatum (F.), Reveals Numerous Sex-Specific Transcripts and Xenobiotic Detoxification Genes Michael E. Sparks 1 , David R. Nelson 2 , Ariela I. Haber 1, Donald C. Weber 1 and Robert L. Harrison 1,* 1 Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA; [email protected] (M.E.S.); [email protected] (A.I.H.); [email protected] (D.C.W.) 2 Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-301-504-5249 Received: 24 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 27 October 2020 Abstract: Acalymma vittatum (F.), the striped cucumber beetle, is an important pest of cucurbit crops in the contintental United States, damaging plants through both direct feeding and vectoring of a bacterial wilt pathogen. Besides providing basic biological knowledge, biosequence data for A. vittatum would be useful towards the development of molecular biopesticides to complement existing population control methods. However, no such datasets currently exist. In this study, three biological replicates apiece of male and female adult insects were sequenced and assembled into a set of 630,139 transcripts (of which 232,899 exhibited hits to one or more sequences in NCBI NR). Quantitative analyses identified 2898 genes differentially expressed across the male–female divide, and qualitative analyses characterized the insect’s resistome, comprising the glutathione S-transferase, carboxylesterase, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase families of xenobiotic detoxification genes. In summary, these data provide useful insights into genes associated with sex differentiation and this beetle’s innate genetic capacity to develop resistance to synthetic pesticides; furthermore, these genes may serve as useful targets for potential use in molecular-based biocontrol technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Pseudogenes in Insect DNA Barcoding: Differing Points of View on the Same Issue
    Biota Neotrop., vol. 12, no. 3 Mitochondrial pseudogenes in insect DNA barcoding: differing points of view on the same issue Luis Anderson Ribeiro Leite1,2 1Laboratório de Estudos de Lepidoptera Neotropical, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná – UFPR, CP 19020, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brasil 2Corresponding author: Luis Anderson Ribeiro Leite, e-mail: [email protected] LEITE, L.A.R. Mitochondrial pseudogenes in insect DNA barcoding: differing points of view on the same issue. Biota Neotrop. 12(3): http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v12n3/en/abstract?thematic-review+bn02412032012 Abstract: Molecular tools have been used in taxonomy for the purpose of identification and classification of living organisms. Among these, a short sequence of the mitochondrial DNA, popularly known as DNA barcoding, has become very popular. However, the usefulness and dependability of DNA barcodes have been recently questioned because mitochondrial pseudogenes, non-functional copies of the mitochondrial DNA incorporated into the nuclear genome, have been found in various taxa. When these paralogous sequences are amplified together with the mitochondrial DNA, they may go unnoticed and end up being analyzed as if they were orthologous sequences. In this contribution the different points of view regarding the implications of mitochondrial pseudogenes for entomology are reviewed and discussed. A discussion of the problem from a historical and conceptual perspective is presented as well as a discussion of strategies to keep these nuclear mtDNA copies out of sequence analyzes. Keywords: COI, molecular, NUMTs. LEITE, L.A.R. Pseudogenes mitocondriais no DNA barcoding em insetos: diferentes pontos de vista sobre a mesma questão.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Plant Resistance: Concept and Significance
    HOST PLANT RESISTANCE: CONCEPT AND SIGNIFICANCE Dr. Muhammad Salim M.Sc. (Hons.)PPR(UAE); M.Sc. ENT (UPLB/IRRI, Philippines & Ph.D. ENT (UPLB/IRRI, Philippines Ex-CSO/ Sr. Director, Plant Sciences Division (PARC) Islamabad HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION ISLAMABAD 1 CONTENTS ABOUT THE AUTHOR……………………………………………………………...…..i FOREWORD…………………………………………………………………..……...…iii PREFACE………………………………………………………….............................vii CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION.……….………………………………………...…….1 1.1. PLANT –INSECT INTERACTIONS CONCEPT…… ……………………...1 1.1.1. Defence Strategies of Plants………………………………………..1 1.1.2. Insect Strategies to Counter Plant Defence……………………….2 1.2. HISTORY OF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE DEVELOPMENT…………..4 1.3. DEFINITIONS…………………………………………………………….……7 1.4. FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES………………………………………………..8 1.5. ADVANTAGES…………………………………………………………………9 1.6. LIMITATIONS…………………………………………………………………10 1.7. HOST PLANT RESISTANCE PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION…....12 1.7.1. Scientific Manpower………………………………………………..12 1.7.2. Scientific Knowledge……………………………………………….12 1.7.3. Availability of Insect Culture……………………………………….12 1.7.4. Genetic Resources………………………………………………....13 1.7.5. Genetic Aspects of Resistance…………………………………...13 1.7.6. Selection of Breeding Methods……………………………………13 1.8. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………….14 CHAPTER-2 MECHANISM OF HOST PLANT RESISTANCE ………………....25 2.1. ECOLOGICAL RESISTANCE………………………………………………25 2.1.1. Host Evasion/Escape/ Phenological Asynchrony……………….25 2.1.2. Induced Resistance………………………………………….……..27 2 2.2. EVOLUTIONARY RESISTANCE…………………………………………..28 2.2.1. Sympatric Resistance………………………………………….…..28 2.2.2. Allopatric Resistance……………………………………………....28 2.3. TROPHIC LEVEL RESISTANCE…………………………………………..29 2.3.1. Intrinsic Resistance………………………………………………...29 2.3.2. Extrinsic Resistance………………………………………………..29 2.4. MECHANISM BASED ON INHERITANCE OF RESISTANCE………….30 2.5. MECHANISM BASED ON CROP STAGE………………………..……….30 2.6. MECHANISM BASED ON SCREENING CONDITIONS………………...30 2.7. MECHANISM BASED ON BIOTYPE REACTION………………………..31 2.8. MECHANISM BASED ON POPULATION………………………..……….33 2.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppression of Tomato Hornworm
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Pedobiologia 50 (2006) 23—29 www.elsevier.de/pedobi Suppression of tomato hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittatum and Diabotrica undecimpunctata) populations and damage by vermicomposts Erdal N. Yardim, Norman Q. AranconÃ, Clive A. Edwards, Thomas J. Oliver, Robert J. Byrne Soil Ecology Laboratory, Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 400 Aronoff Laboratory, 318 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Received 6 June 2005; accepted 5 September 2005 KEYWORDS Summary Vermicompost; The effects of food waste vermicompost on populations of adult striped cucumber Arthropod pests; beetles (Acalymma vittatum) and spotted cucumber beetles (Diabotrica undecim- Cucumber beetles; punctata) on cucumbers and larval hornworms on tomatoes (Manduca quinquemacu- Tomato hornworms; lata) were evaluated in both greenhouse and field experiments as well as damage Pest suppression caused. In the field, cucumber and tomato plants were grown, with two different application rates (1.25 and 2.5 t haÀ1) of food waste vermicompost or inorganic fertilizer, in a complete randomized block design field experiment. All treatments were balanced for NPK. Field cucumber beetle populations were suppressed significantly on cucumber plants treated with food waste vermicompost at both application rates, compared with those on plants treated only with inorganic fertilizer. In the greenhouse, cucumber and tomato plants were grown in a soil-less medium MetroMix 360 (MM360) substituted with 0%, 20% or 40% food waste vermicompost, and exposed to standardized pest attacks in nylon mesh cages. In the greenhouse, both the 20% and 40% vermicompost substitution rates decreased damage by cucumber beetles to cucumber foliage and hornworms to tomato foliage significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetable Insects Department of Entomology
    E-30-W Vegetable Insects Department of Entomology CUCURBIT INSECT MANAGEMENT Ricky E. Foster, Extension Entomologist Muskmelons, watermelons, cucumber, squash, gourds, Adults are similar to house flies, grayish-brown and about 1/5 and pumpkins are cucurbits commonly grown in Indiana. inch long. The flies lay their eggs in moist soil where there is an These crops, are attacked by a variety of insects and related abundance of decaying vegetable matter. The eggs hatch at pests, including aphids, cucumber beetles, seedcorn maggot, soil temperatures about 50oF. The maggots are yellowish-white, squash bug, squash vine borer, and twospotted spider mite. legless, and about 1/4 inch long when fully grown. Cool, wet Scouting a field to estimate the number of pests present periods favor the development of the maggots. The maggots is an important component of effective management. The field pupate in the soil. The life cycle can be completed in about 3 should be scouted in a “Z” pattern. For each 20-acre field, at weeks. There are 3 to 5 generations per year, depending on least 10 plants in 10 locations should be checked. Cucumber latitude, but the first generation is economically most important. beetles, aphids, and twospotted spider mite usually infest at the field border first and then move into the field. Time for Scouting Scout the field after crop is set until early June. SEEDCORN MAGGOT Management Options Type of Injury Plow Cover Crop Early The maggots or larvae bore into the seeds, often destroy- Plow down the cover crop at least 3 to 4 weeks before ing the germs, and into seedlings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cucumber Beetles in Vegetable Crops 2019 Continuing Education for Pest Management Zheng Wang, Ph.D
    Cucumber Beetles in Vegetable Crops 2019 Continuing Education for Pest Management Zheng Wang, Ph.D. University of California Cooperative Extension October 22, 2019 In the next 50-55 minutes… Cucumber beetles: Identity Their damage Control/prevent practices across the country Cucumber Beetles: Identity Cucumber beetles in general: Stripped cucumber beetle Spotted cucumber beetle Banded cucumber beetle Abundant info from xxx.edu. Cucumber Beetles: Identity Common name Latin name Major distribution Susceptible vegetables Western spotted cucumber Diabrotica Rocky Mountains, Major pest for cucurbits beetle undecimpunctata Mississippi River are including all melons, undecimpunctata considered the limits of cucumber, watermelon, Spotted cucumber beetle D. Undecimpunctata their distributions. squash. (Southern corn rootworm) howardi Western spotted and Other vegetables include striped cucumber beetles beans, sweet corn, sweet Western stripped Acalymma trivittatum are commonly found in potato, etc. (mainly fed by cucumber beetle California. Western species). Eastern stripped A. vittatum cucumber beetle Banded cucumber beetle Level of severity is varied. Banded cucumber beetle Diabrotica balteata is found mainly in southern California. Cucumber Beetles: Morphology 1/5-in long, 1/10-in wide Source:Source: P. Goodell USGS and P. Phillips Cucumber Beetles: Morphology 1/4-in long, 12 black spots on elytra Source: P. Goodell and P. Phillips Cucumber Beetles: Morphology Range throughout southern U.S. from NC to southern CA Source: J. Castner, Univ. of FL Similar size to spotted cucumber beetle Prefer Legumes and Cucurbitaceae crops Cucumber Beetles: Morphology Black stripes end before reaching the abdomen tip Do not confuse striped Source: Dept. of Entomology, KSU cucumber beetle with Western corn rootworm. In the next 50-55 minutes… Cucumber beetles: Identity Their damage Control/prevent practices across the country Cucumber Beetles: Damage Cucumber beetles have a wide range of host plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Striped Cucumber Beetle Acalymma Vittatum (Fabricius); Family: Chrysomelidae
    IDL INSECT DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY Cornell University, Dept. of Entomology, 2144 Comstock Hall, Ithaca NY 14853-2601 Striped Cucumber Beetle Acalymma vittatum (Fabricius); Family: Chrysomelidae Striped cucumber beetles. Photo from Clemson University, USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org Injury This insect is injurious to cucumber, squash, melon and related plants. It is native to America and can be found wherever its food plants are present except the far west. Striped cucumber beetles are carriers of bacterial wilt, a serious disease of cucurbits. As they feed they transmit the pathogen from one plant to another, and carry it over the winter when they hibernate. The following spring the beetles may infect new plants with the disease. The greatest injury done by this insect is to the young plants soon after they come up in the spring. The adults feed on them and may even kill them. The larvae cause injury by burrowing into the stem, both above and below the ground. They may also feed on the underside of fruit when it lies on the ground. Adult beetles will feed on flowers and destroy them by eating off pistils. New broods of beetles may feed on the rinds of ripening fruits. Description The adult beetle is small, ¼ inch in length. The head is black, thorax yellow, and the wing covers are yellow with three longitudinal black stripes. The mature larva is 3/10 inch in length, white with a brown head, thorax and anal plates. Life History The adult beetles hibernate under garden debris or if such protection is not available, they will burrow into the soil below the frost line.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed My Progress Throughout This Study
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy o f a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “ target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Pagets)” . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced in to the film along w ith adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete co ntin u ity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “ sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin film in g at the upper left hand corner o f a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again -beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Striped Cucumber Beetle
    Pest Profile Photo credit: Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org (Left); Luke Tembrock, USDA APHIS PPQ ITP, Bugwood.org (Right) Common Name: Western Striped Cucumber Beetle Scientific Name: Acalymma trivittatum Order and Family: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae Size and Appearance: Length (mm) Appearance Egg Oval in shape Yellow to orange in color Laid at the base of host plants Larva/Nymph Off-white to yellow in color 8-13 mm Brown head and legs Adult Bright yellow in color with 3 uniform black stripes across the back Central stripe is divided on either side of the wing cover 8-9 mm Wing covers are also covered in small indentations Pupa (if applicable) White to yellow in color 6 mm Look like soft-bodied adults without wings Pupate in the soil Type of feeder (Chewing, sucking, etc.): Larvae and adults both have chewing mouthparts. Host plant/s: Roots and fruits of cucurbits and leaves, stems, blossoms, and fruit of corn, potatoes, tomatoes, beans, and peach fruits. Description of Damage (larvae and adults): Larvae only cause minor damage by chewing on the roots and sometimes even the rind of young cucumbers and melons. Adults often feed on young, tender plants which can lead to stunting, scarring, malformation or even death of young seedlings. Their feeding also results in holes and chew marks in the leaves as well as leaving pits that reduce marketability of the crop. Adult beetles may also cause indirect damage from vectoring plant pathogens such as cucumber mosaic virus, and Erwinia tracheiphila, the causal agent of bacterial wilt of cucurbits.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Strategies of Forest Insects: the Need for a Community- Level Approach to Reforestation
    New Forests 1 : 57-66 (/986) © Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht — Printed in the Netherlands Ecological strategies of forest insects: the need for a community- level approach to reforestation T.D. SCHOWALTER Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Key words: forest protection, silviculture, pest management, site productivity, forest spatial structure, forest condition Application. Reforestation practices, such as site preparation, seedling species, planting method, brush control and precommercial thinning, affect seedling susceptibility, attractiveness, and exposure to insects and disease. Therefore, these practices have the potential to mitigate insect and pathogen activity over long time periods, perhaps entire rotations. Effective use of these practices for forest protection requires a community-level perspective in order to anticipate potentially destructive responses by various insects and pathogens, even those not previously recognized as potential pests. This prediction will allow modification of timing or techniques, that reduce or prevent the risk of insect or pathogen population growth, in situations in which the risk of a destructive response is high. Abstract. The traditional, single-species approach to forest pest management is considered in light of the range of ecological strategies respresented in forest arthropod communities. Insect population growth and impact depend on host variables subject to silvicultural manipulation, especially during early stages of forest development, but silvicultural practices often induce undesirable responses from non-target insect populations. A suggested approach to forest pest management involves consideration of arthropod community structure, life history traits, and interactions among arthropod and plant species in order to anticipate insect responses and refine silvicultural recommendations accordingly. Introduction Protection of forest resources from unacceptable levels of damage by insects and pathogens is a major goal of forest management.
    [Show full text]