DOCSLIB.ORG

Expected Outcome and Indicators of the Budget Programs Accessible

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Expected Outcome and Indicators of the Budget Programs Accessible Expected Outcome and Indicators of the Budget Programs Accessible Quality Healthcare and Social Security Including Including Organizational Forecast Forecast Name Draft 2017 Budget own Forecast 2018 Code 2019 2020 Resources resources 35 02 Social Protection of Population 2,438,000.0 2,438,000.0 0.0 2,500,000.0 2,570,000.0 2,650,000.0 35 03 Population Healthcare 894,454.0 894,454.0 0.0 910,000.0 940,000.0 960,000.0 29 03 Healthcare and Social Security 62,032.0 53,757.0 8,275.0 60,700.0 60,700.0 60,700.0 Management of Labor, Health and 35 01 50,196.0 49,296.0 900.0 50,300.0 50,600.0 50,900.0 Social Protection Programs Rehabilitation and Equipment of 35 04 30,000.0 30,000.0 0.0 33,500.0 33,500.0 33,500.0 Medical Institutions 54 00 LEPL – State Service of Veterans Affairs 6,400.0 6,400.0 0.0 5,200.0 5,200.0 5,200.0 Labor and Employment System Reform 35 05 4,050.0 4,050.0 0.0 4,500.0 4,500.0 4,500.0 Program Provision of Healthcare Services for 30 04 Employees of Ministry of Internal 3,750.0 3,650.0 100.0 4,150.0 4,150.0 4,150.0 Affairs System 57 00 N(N)LE –Solidarity Fund of Georgia 260.0 260.0 0.0 260.0 260.0 260.0 Total 3,489,142.0 3,479,867.0 9,275.0 3,568,610.0 3,668,910.0 3,769,210.0 2 Social Protection of Population (35 02) Program Implementer LEPL – Social Service Agency Project Description and Realization of social-economic rights of population guaranteed by legislation, relieve material condition of targeted social Objectives groups and improve physical and social condition and integration to society of disabled persons (including children), elderly and children without care, socially unprotected, homeless and under risk of abandonment, which is achieved through preventive, rehabilitation, alternative, family strengthening services and supplementary activities; Provision of pensions to population of pension age (females 60 years and males 65 years) and state compensation for specific categories (former employees of law enforcement bodies, prosecutor’s office and civil aviation, former parliament members, persons with highest diplomatic rank, etc.); Improve social condition and integration to society of disabled persons (including children), elderly and children without care, socially unprotected, homeless and under risk of abandonment Subsistence assistance for households under poverty line; social packages for targeted groups; allowance for IDPs, refugees and persons with humanitarian status; reintegration allowance; pecuniary benefits to support improvement of demographic situation; assistance for maternity and childcare, as well as for adoption of a new-born child; reimbursement of losses due to the damage to health of an employee while fulfilling employment contract requirements Finance additional support to pensioners/social package beneficiaries residing in high-mountainous settlements in the amount of 20% of pension/social package. Finance additional support for medical personnel – double pension for doctors, amount equal to one pension for nurses. Reimburse 50% of consumed electricity cost to subscribers (to communal services) living in high-mountainous settlements not exceeding cost of 100 kwh. Expected Project Realized social-economic rights of citizens guaranteed by legislation; Outcome Improved social-economic condition of vulnerable groups, de-institutionalization, prevention; Continuous financial support to disabled persons; Strengthened households, developed alternative services and enhanced accessibility of the services. Outcome Indicators 1. Baseline Indicator – Pension, including additional amounts for pensioners permanently living at high-mountainous settlements, and compensations are issued on time to the beneficiaries defined by legislation. 3 Target Indicator - Pension and compensation is issued on time to all beneficiaries defined by legislation. Possible Deviation (%/description) - 2% 2. Target Indicator – Socially vulnerable persons who receive subsistence assistance are provided with social assistance; Target Indicator – All socially vulnerable persons are provided with subsistence assistance when necessary. Possible Risks – Reduction of the number of applications. 3. Baseline Indicator – All disabled persons are provided with assistance per regulations set by legislation, including social package additions; Target Indicator – Disabled assistance is issued as needed; Possible Deviation (%/description) - 5% Possible Risks – Reduction of the number of applications. 4. Baseline Indicator – Children’s small household type boardrooms (7 houses) – 30% completely meet requirements, the rest partially meet requirements; Target Indicator - 40% of services fully meet the requirements set by the standard; Possible Deviation (%/description) - 10% Possible Risks – Reduction of the number of applications. 5. Baseline Indicator – Out of 11 disabled persons’ day centers (including for children) - 40 % fully meet requirements set by standards, the rest partially meet the requirements; Target Indicator - 50% meet the requirements set by the standards; Possible Deviation (%/description) - 10% Possible Risks – Reduction of the number of applications. 6. Baseline Indicator – Out of 13 community organizations 34% completely fulfill requirements, the rest only partially fulfill requirements; Target Indicator - 45% of services fully meet requirements set by standards; Possible Deviation (%/description) - 10% Possible Risks – Reduction of the number of applications. 4 Provision of Pension for Population (35 02 01) Sub-program LEPL – Social Service Agency Implementer Project Description and Provision of pensions to population of pension age (females 60 years and males 65 years) and state compensation for specific Objectives categories (former employees of law enforcement bodies, prosecutor’s office and civil aviation, former parliament members, persons with highest diplomatic rank, etc.); Realization of social-economic rights of citizens guaranteed by legislation. Expected Project Pension age population and specific categories are provided with pension and state compensation. Output Output Indicators 1. Baseline Indicator – Pension is issued on time to the beneficiaries defined by legislation (about 716.0 thousand pensioners); Target Indicator - Pension is issued on time to the beneficiaries defined by legislation (about 770.0 thousand pensioners); Possible Deviation (%/description) - 2%; Possible Risks - Lower number of applications from pension age persons, which might be caused by their employment in public sector or due to them leaving the country or due to other circumstances. 2. Baseline Indicator - Compensation is issued on time to the beneficiaries defined by legislation (about 22.0 thousand recipients of state compensation); Target Indicator - Compensation is issued on time to the beneficiaries defined by legislation (about 22.0 thousand recipients of state compensation); Possible Deviation (%/description) - 5%; Possible Risks - Lower number of applications for state compensation, which might be caused by their employment in public sector or due to them leaving the country and due to other circumstances Social Assistance to Target Groups of Population (35 02 02) Sub-program LEPL – Social Service Agency Implementer 5 Project Description and Subsistence assistance for households under poverty line, social packages for targeted groups, allowance for IDPs, refugees and Objectives persons with humanitarian status, reintegration allowance, pecuniary benefits to support improvement of demographic situation, assistance for maternity and childcare, as well as for adoption of a new-born child in order to relieve material condition of target social groups. Reimbursement of losses due to the damage to health of an employee while fulfilling employment contract requirements. Expected Project Provide social transfers to targeted social groups. Output Output Indicators 1. Baseline Indicator – Socially unprotected targeted groups are provided with social assistance and the assistance is issued on time (168.0 thousand recipients of social packages, about 240.0 thousand IDPs, refugees or persons with humanitarian status, about 400.0 thousand persons below poverty line and etc.); coverage of the lowest decile by targeted social assistance - 50%; comparative poverty indicator- 22.4%; Target Indicator – Subsistence assistance is issued to all socially unprotected persons on needs basis; timely issue of subsistence assistance will be maintained (about 758.0 thousand beneficiaries); coverage of the lowest decile by targeted social assistance - 60%; comparative poverty indicator- 20%; Possible Deviation (%/description) - 2% Possible Risks – Reduction of the number of applications, change of the model for identification/checking of disabled person status, insufficient readiness of biological families. Social Rehabilitation and Childcare (35 02 03) Sub-program LEPL – Social Service Agency Implementer Project Description and Improve physical and social condition and support to integration in society of disabled persons, elderly and children without Objectives care through use of preventive, rehabilitative, alternative, family strengthening services and provision of supplementary means. Expected Project Provide social services and products to the targeted groups Output 6 Output Indicators 1. Baseline Indicator - about 10 000 beneficiaries; the indicator for fulfillment of recommendations and meeting standards is 80%; Target Indicator - About 13 500 beneficiaries; the indicator for fulfillment of recommendations and meeting standards
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final Report
    Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Tbilisi 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Background information ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Literature review ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Imereti – Historical-Cultural Overview
    SFG2110 SECOND REGIONAL DEVELOPMETN PROJECT IMERETI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IMERETI TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Public Disclosure Authorized STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, CULTURAL HERITAGE AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Tbilisi, December, 2014 ABBREVIATIONS GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Management System IFI International Financial Institution IRDS Imereti Regional Development Strategy ITDS Imereti Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoIA Ministry of Internal Affairs MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MoJ Ministry of Justice MoESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit PPE Personal protective equipment RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 0 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 PROJECT CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018
    STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection 2018 Statistical Publication TBILISI 2019 1 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Editors: Gogita Todradze Lia Dzebisauri Person responsible for the publication: Irakli Tsikhelashvili Persons worked on the publication: Tamar Tarashvili Nino Zurabishvili Notation keys: ... Data are not available - Magnitude nil Negligible 0.0 magnitude The discrepancy between the totals and the sum in some cases can be explained by using rounded data The data in this publication do not cover uccupied territories of Georgia (Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region) © National Statistic Office of Georgia 30, Tsotne Dadiani Str., 0180, Tbilisi, Georgia Phone/Fax: (+995 32) 2 36 72 10 (500) E-mail: [email protected] Web-page: www.geostat.ge 2 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2018 Foreword Statistical publication "Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of Georgia" presents information on the use of land, forest and water resources, ambient air protection, protected areas, natural disasters and environ- mental violations. It also includes methodological explanations and information from different reference and scien- tific sources. The preparation of this publication is based on the growing interest of a wide range of users, however, the in- formation collected in it, presents the best way of policy planning at local or global levels. In addition, the need to produce environmental indicators is related to the most important issues of global policy, such as climate change and environmental security. The data in the publication reflects the natural resources of Georgia and developed trends of environmental activities in 2000-2018. Substantive comments and suggestions on the format and content of the publication will be highly appreciated by the group of authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Team (Regional Or Program Level) PDO Project Development Objective POM Program Operational Manual RETF Recipient Executed Trust Fund
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR00003374 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (TF-13973 TF-14063) ON A TRUST FUND GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF EUROS 9.00 MILLION (US$ 11.21 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF NATURE (IUCN) AND WORLDWIDE FUND FOR NATURE (WWF) FOR THE Public Disclosure Authorized EUROPEAN NEIGHBORHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT EAST COUNTRIES FOREST LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNANCE II PROGRAM June 28, 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized Environment and Natural Resources Global Practice Europe and Central Asia Region CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective Date 06/28/2017) Currency Unit = Euro Euro 1.00 = US$ 1.136 US$ 1.00 = Euro 0.880 FISCAL YEAR July 1 – June 30 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADA Austrian Development Agency BETF Bank executed trust fund CWP Country Work Plan EC European Commission ECA Europe and Central Asia EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return ENPI European Neighborhood and Partnership Instrument ENPI-FLEG (I European Neighborhood and Partnership Instrument Forest Law and II) Enforcement and Governance (Phase I and II) EU European Union EUTR European Union Timber Regulation FLEG I, II Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (phase I and II) FLEGT Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade GDP Gross Domestic Product FLERMONECA Forest and Biodiversity Governance Including Environmental Monitoring FLR Forest Landscape Restoration ICR Implementation completion and results report ICT Information and Communication
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Protected Areas in Regard to Climate Change Scoping Study, Georgia
    The Role of Protected Areas in Regard to Climate Change Scoping Study, Georgia The Role of Protected Areas in Regard to Climate Change Scoping Study, Georgia IUCN CAUCASUS COOPERATION CENTRE The Role of Protected Areas in Regard to Climate Change Scoping Study, Georgia 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Role of Protected Areas in response to Climate Change ............................................................ 5 1.1. Existing Challenges ................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Role of Protected Areas ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3. Why Protected Areas? ............................................................................................................... 7 2. Climate Change in Georgia .............................................................................................................. 8 2.1. Background Information ............................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Existing Regulations .................................................................................................................. 9 2.3. Observed and Predicted Changes ........................................................................................ 10 2.4. Regions
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Report
    LLC "The United water Supply Company of Georgia" Project on the Construction and Operation of Kutaisi Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impact Assessment Report Urban Services Improvement Investment Program of Georgia Funded by: Government of Georgia Kocks Consult GmbH Stegemannstr. 32-38 D-56068 Koblenz Tel.: +49 261 1302-0 Fax: +49 261 1302-400 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.kocks-ing.de Page 1 of 186 LLC "The United water Supply Company of Georgia" Project on the Construction and Operation of Kutaisi Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impact Assessment Report Prepared by: Tomas Buti Consulting Firm "Kocks Consulting" Page 2 of 186 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 General Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Basis for Preparation of EIA Report ................................................................................................................ 8 1.3 Objectives of EIA ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Legal and Administrative Aspects ............................................................................................ 8 2.1 Law of Georgia on Environmental Protection ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 53178-001: East–West Highway (Shorapani–Argveta Section) Improvement Project
    Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 53178-001 May 2019 GEO: East–West Highway (Shorapani–Argveta Section) Improvement Project Part 8 (Sections F–G) Prepared by the Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia for the Asian Development Bank. This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Section F4 of the Khevi-Ubisa-Shorapani-Argveta Road (E60 Highway) Environmental Impact Assessment Sample ID Coordinates Rationale for Site Selection SW02 42 ° 06’12.29”N / 43° 03’57.67”E At location of Bridge BRI 4.1.04-AT/TA, Kvirila River Figure 48: Surface Water Monitoring Locations 443. The results of the water quality monitoring are presented in Table 34 below show that both the Dzirula and Kvirila rivers meet the national MACs for surface water quality at the sampling locations, although the levels of manganese in the Kvirila sample was above the recommended standards for drinking water. This reflects the findings of the study on manganese in the Kvirila river
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Review Frameworks
    Environmental Assessment and Review Framework Project Number: 43405 November 2010 Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility Georgia: Urban Services Improvement Investment Program United Water Supply Company of Georgia (UWSCG) Government of Georgia ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AP - Affected Person CWRD - Central and West Asia Region Department DQMEP - Department of Quality Management & Environmental Protection EA - Executing Agency EARF - Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EEC - Environmental Expertise Conclusion EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EIP - Environmental Impact Permit EMP - Environmental Management Plan GoG - Government of Georgia GRC - Grievance Redress Committee GUSIIP - Georgia Urban Sector Improvement Investment Program IA - Implementing Agency IEE - Initial Environmental Examination MDDP - Municipal Development and Decentralization Project MDF - Municipal Development Fund MFF - Multi-tranche Financing Facility MoEPNR - Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources MoRDI - Ministry of Regional Development & Infrastructure NGO - Non-Governmental Organization OSPF - Office of the Special Project Facilitator OCRP - Office of the Compliance Review panel PIU - Project Implementation Unit IPMO - Investment Project Management Office REA - Rapid Environmental Assessment USWCG - United Water Supply Company of Georgia NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. iii CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. ASSESSMENT OF LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY 4 A. National Legislation 4 B. ADB Policy 5 III. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 7 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PROJECTS AND COMPONENTS 9 A. Environmental Assessment Procedure 9 B. Preparation of Initial Environmental Examinations (IEE) 11 C. Preparation of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) 11 D. Procedure to be followed for Projects requiring EIP 12 V. CONSULTATION, DISCLOSURE AND GRIEVANCE REDRESS 13 A. Consultation & Disclosure 13 B. Grievance Redress Mechanism 14 VI. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 17 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 53118-001: Livable Cities Investment Project for Balanced Regional Development
    Draft Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 53118-001 August 2021 Georgia: Livable Cities Investment Program for Balanced Development Package LCIP-CW-01 Construction of Kindergarten in Kutaisi Prepared by the Municipal Development Fund and Ministry of Regional Development & Infrastructure, Government of Georgia for the Asian Development Bank. This draft initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 11 June 2021) Currency units – United states Dollars (USD) USD 1.00 = GEL 3.1559 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ha – hectares km – kilometers km² – square kilometers m – meters m3 – cubic meters mm – millimeters NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AASHTO - American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials CSC - Construction Supervisory Consultant DIN - Deutsches Institut für Normung EA - Executing Agency EARF - Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EHS - Environmental, Health and Safety EAC - Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection
    NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA NATURAL RESOURCES OF GEORGIA AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2016 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION TBILISI 2017 STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2016 Statistical Publication Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection, 2016 Editor: Maia Guntsadze Vasil Tsakadze Persons responsible for the publication: Vasil Tsakadze Nino Kverghelidze Prepared by: Nino Kverghelidze © National Statistic Office of Georgia, 2017 30, Tsotne Dadiani Str., 0180, Tbilisi, Georgia Phone/Fax: (+995 32) 2 36 72 10 (500) E-mail: [email protected] Web page: http://www.geostat.ge STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2016 Foreword The present statistical publication, “Natural Resources of Georgia and Environmental Protection” provides information about use and protection of land, forest and water resources, protected areas, natural hazards and vio- lations of law related to environemtnal protection. It also presents some methodological explanations and infor- mation from different scientific sources. The data given in the publication reflect the main trends in the field of natural resources of Georgia and envi- ronmental protection activities in 1995-2016. Notation keys: ... No data - Event does not exist 0.0 Negligible magnitude The discrepancy between the totals and the sum in some cases can be explained by using rounded data. The data in this publication do not cover uccupied territories of Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region. 1 | FOREWORD STATISTICAL PUBLICATION | 2016 Table of contents Geographic location and natural resources
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Eco-Regional Nature Conservation Programme for the Southern Caucasus (ENCP), Phase III ANNEXES to the FINAL REPORT Cons
    GEORGIA Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural Resources (MEPNR) and German Financial Cooperation (KfW) Eco-regional Nature Conservation Programme for the Southern Caucasus (ENCP), Phase III ANNEXES TO THE FINAL REPORT Consulting Services for the Preparation of a Programme Based Thematic Approach January 2011 Deutsche Forstservice GmbH AGEG Consultants eG GEO - EP III Extension Study Final Report Annexes LIST OF ANNEXES Annex 1: Terms of reference for the study Annex 2: List of Georgia’s protected areas and their administrations Annex 3: List of relevant institutions and organisations with short descriptions Annex 4: Description of proposed programme areas Annex 5: Assessment of the Management Effectiveness of the Selected Areas Using Se- lected RAPPAM criteria Annex 6: Log frame matrix Annex 7: Cost and financing plan Annex 8: Implementation schedule Annex 9: Organisation diagram of PEA and PIA Annex 10: List of functions and tasks of the proposed PMU and indication of the needs for international consultants assistance Annex 11: Diagram of the implementation structure of the programme Annex 12: Project cycles for investment measures to be financed by the programme Annex 13: Tabular presentation of the programme Annex 14: List of persons and institutions contacted Annex 15: List of literature and documents with comments GEO - EP III Extension Study Final Report Annexes CONTACT PERSONS AND ADDRESSES For DFS Deutsche Forstservice GmbH Mr. Christian SCHADE Managing Director DFS Deutsche Forstservice GmbH Wittelsbacherstr. 11 85622 Feldkirchen Germany Phone: + 49 – (0)89 - 94 00 59 21 Fax: + 49 – (0)89 - 94 00 59 79 Email: [email protected] For AGEG Consultants eG Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Values Into Nbsaps
    INCORPORATING BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICE VALUES INTO NBSAPS ANNEX – COUNTRY CASE STUDIES This guidance has been produced as an output of a joint UNEP-WCMC and IEEP project, funded by Defra, and in collaboration with the CBD Secretariat to examine the ‘Lessons learnt from incorporating biodiversity and ecosystem service values into NBSAPs’. 2 CONTENTS 1. Case Study: Burkina Faso 7 2. Case Study: Federated States of Micronesia 19 3. Case Study: Georgia 28 4. Case Study: Guatemala 37 5. Case Study: Norway 56 6. Case Study: South Africa 64 Adam Gryko/ Shutterstock.com Document Development Authors This annex originates from a joint UNEP-WCMC and IEEP These case studies were co-authored by the following: 3 project, undertaken in collaboration with the CBD Secretariat Burkina Faso: Leonardo Mazza, Institute for European to identify the ‘Lessons Learned in Incorporating the Values of Environmental Policy (IEEP) with support from Somanegré Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into National Biodiversity Nana (Permanent Secretariat of the National Council for Strategies and Action Plans’. Environment and Sustainable Development, Burkina Faso). The project pulled together a significant knowledge base Federated States of Micronesia: Willy Kostka (Micronesia which integrated a literature review with the knowledge and Conservation Trust), Alissa Takesy (Federated States of experiences of CBD Parties themselves. An on line survey Micronesia national government, Department of Resources was disseminated to CBD National Focal Points or where and Development), Kim Bonine (Conservation Strategy suitable, alternative country representatives with a significant Fund), and Kevin Rhodes (University of Hawaii). role in NBSAP revision. As well as remote follow up with survey respondents, six case study countries were identified Georgia: Anja Wittich, International Union for Conservation for in-depth consultations (Micronesia, Georgia, Burkina of Nature (IUCN) Caucasus Cooperation Centre.
    [Show full text]