A General History of the Burr Family, 1902
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Martin Van Buren: the Greatest American President
SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 Martin Van Buren The Greatest American President —————— ✦ —————— JEFFREY ROGERS HUMMEL resident Martin Van Buren does not usually receive high marks from histori- ans. Born of humble Dutch ancestry in December 1782 in the small, upstate PNew York village of Kinderhook, Van Buren gained admittance to the bar in 1803 without benefit of higher education. Building on a successful country legal practice, he became one of the Empire State’s most influential and prominent politi- cians while the state was surging ahead as the country’s wealthiest and most populous. -
Aarp Recommended Online Games Free
Aarp Recommended Online Games Free collectivizeSweatiest and her transhumantkyats vats or Garrett stay pokily. always literalising diminutively and wipe his paronyms. Patric freewheel synodically. Revived and bibliomaniacal Skell Speed past your opponents to make it first to the finish line. While the initial rates are lower at the time coverage is purchased, the rates will increase throughout the life of the policy. Parisian talent agents struggle to keep their famous clients happy and their business afloat. Each game starts with three timed rounds of trivia where you must guess the top answers for each question before time runs out. Exercise for mind anywhere anytime on our online brain health program exclusively from AARP Staying Sharp. Chance or Community Chest Get Out of Jail Free card, or attempt to roll doubles on the dice. Like Control Points, each point can be captured by either the RED or BLU teams. University of Exeter Medical School and Kings College London concluded that practitioners of word puzzles maintain brain function as they age, especially in the categories of attention, reasoning, and memory. You can find on your individual events organised by solving crossword is played by matching pairs of aarp recommended online games free! This is because each move you make has a key impact on the next one you take. To play with a friend select the icon next to the timer at the top of the puzzle. Sudoku puzzle each day! An expert crossword sets you an attacked once a free aarp organisation information. Each level of your hand of reachable positions of free app, and simple memory and free aarp online games including guaranteed. -
Myth and Memory: the Legacy of the John Hancock House
MYTH AND MEMORY: THE LEGACY OF THE JOHN HANCOCK HOUSE by Rebecca J. Bertrand A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in American Material Culture Spring 2010 Copyright 2010 Rebecca J. Bertrand All Rights Reserved MYTH AND MEMORY: THE LEGACY OF THE JOHN HANCOCK HOUSE by Rebecca J. Bertrand Approved: __________________________________________________________ Brock Jobe, M.A. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ J. Ritchie Garrison, Ph.D. Director of the Winterthur Program in American Material Culture Approved: __________________________________________________________ George H. Watson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Debra Hess Norris, M.S. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Every Massachusetts schoolchild walks Boston’s Freedom Trail and learns the story of the Hancock house. Its demolition served as a rallying cry for early preservationists and students of historic preservation study its importance. Having been both a Massachusetts schoolchild and student of historic preservation, this project has inspired and challenged me for the past nine months. To begin, I must thank those who came before me who studied the objects and legacy of the Hancock house. I am greatly indebted to the research efforts of Henry Ayling Phillips (1852- 1926) and Harriette Merrifield Forbes (1856-1951). Their research notes, at the American Antiquarian Society in Worcester, Massachusetts served as the launching point for this project. This thesis would not have been possible without the assistance and guidance of my thesis adviser, Brock Jobe. -
Morgan Horses Bred at Uconn
MORGAN HORSES BRED AT UCONN YOB NAME SIRE DAM 1942 MAC ARTHUR GOLDFIELD ROMANCE 1944 GOLDEN JOY GOLDFIELD JOYOUS 1946 QUADRILLE NILES JOYCE 1947 COLT MENTOR JOYCE 1948 COLT MENTOR JOYCE 1949 CANNONEER CANFIELD SCOTCH MELODY 1949 CANNIE CANFIELD PHILLIPA 1949 OH BE JOYFUL CANFIELD GOLDER JOY 1949 MANNA MENTOR DIANA 1949 MEG CANFIELD PEGGY 1949 TUNEFUL PANFIELD JOYCE 1950 SUNNFIELD CANFIELD PEGGY 1951 UCONN ESTELLITA STELLAR PENNSY 1951 UCONN HI-NOON MENTOR QUOTATION 1951 UCONN KNIGHT MENTOR PENNYROYAL 1951 UCONN PHOENIX SUREFOOT MEADOWLARK 1952 UC PANELLA PANFIELD MABLE MORGAN 1952 UC PANDORA PANFIELD MAY SENTNEY 1952 UC MENTION MENTOR QUOTATION 1952 UC PRINCESS BLAZE MENTOR PENNYROYAL 1952 UC PANYLN PANFIELD RAYMOND’S LYN 1953 UC HERMES MEADE HERMINA 1953 UC MEBBA MENTOR SHEBA 1953 UC PENTOR MENTOR PENNSY 1953 UC QUOTOR MENTOR QUOTATION 1954 UC CANTOR MENTOR CANNIE 1954 UC HERMIT MENTOR HERMINA 1954 UC PANDRA PANFIELD ADLYNDRA 1954 UC PENTORA MENTOR PENNSY 1954 UC QUOMEN MENTOR QUOTATION 1954 UC SENTORA MENTOR SENTANA 1954 UC TORSHA MENTOR SHEBA 1955 UC MANEZ US PANEZ MANNEQUIN 1955 UC TORIN MENTOR HERMINA 1955 UC PANQUOTA PANFIELD QUOTATION 1955 UC PANTANA PANFIELD SENTANA 1955 UC SANDRA PANFIELD ADLYNDRA 1956 UC SERENADE PANFIELD SHEBA 1956 UC STUDENT PRINCE MENTOR UC PANELLA 1957 UC COUNTRY BOY PANFIELD HERMINA 1957 UC HIGH LIFE MENTOR UC PANETTE 1957 UC MAIN EVENT PANFIELD UCONN ESTELLITA 1957 UC MELODIE PANFIELD SHEBA 1957 MENFIELD TOPFIELD QUAKERLADY 1957 UC PACEMAKER MENTOR CANNIE 1957 UC PANELLA P MENTOR UC PANELLA 1957 UC PENFIELD -
A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936 -
Cedar Grove Environmental Resource Inventory
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared by: Cedar Grove Environmental Commission 525 Pompton Avenue Cedar Grove, NJ 07009 December 2002 Revised and updated February 2017 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………......... 1 2.0 PURPOSE………………………………………………………………….. 2 3.0 BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………… 4 4.0 BRIEF HISTORY OF CEDAR GROVE…………………………………. 5 4.1 The Canfield-Morgan House…………………………………………….. 8 5.0 PHYSICAL FEATURES………………………………………………….. 10 5.1 Topography………………………………………………………………... 10 5.2 Geology……………………………………………………………………. 10 5.3 Soils………………………………………………………………………… 13 5.4 Wetlands…………………………………………………………………... 14 6.0 WATER RESOURCES…………………………………………………… 15 6.1 Ground Water……………………………………………………………... 15 6.1.1 Well-Head Protection Areas…………………………………………. 15 6.2 Surface Water…………………………………………………………….. 16 6.3 Drinking Water…………………………………………………………….. 17 7.0 CLIMATE…………………………………………………………………… 20 8.0 N ATURAL HAZARDS…………………………………………………… 22 8.1 Flooding……………………………………………………………………. 22 8.2 Radon………………………………………………………………………. 22 8.3 Landslides…………………………………………………………………. 23 8.4 Earthquakes………………………………………………………………. 24 9.0 WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION…………………………………………. 25 9.1 Mammals, Reptiles, Amphibians, and Fish……………………………. 26 9.2 Birds………………………………………………………………………… 27 9.3 Vegetation………………………………………………………………….. 28 10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY………………………………………...... 29 10.1 Non-Point Source Pollution……………………………………………... 29 10.1.1 Integrated Pest Management (IPM)……………………………… 32 10.2 Known Contaminated Sites……………………………………………. -
Historic Preservation Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta, Georgia
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Fonm 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Fulton County Almshouse other names/site number .:....:..::::...:....::-'-'-..:....:..=.c:...:...:...:'---Haven Home _ 2. Location street & number 215 West Wieuca Road NW not for publication city or town '---A-=ctl.::..ca'---nt:.::.a'---________________________ Evicinity state Georgia code GA county code 121 zip code 30342 ------- 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ..!.....- nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ~ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide .....!....Iocal Date Historic Preservation Division, Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government [ In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. -
The Brutal Truth: What Happened in the Gulf Country
______________________________________________________________________________________________________ THE BRUTAL TRUTH What happened in the gulf country BY TONY ROBERTS Sir John Downer, who twice served as premier of South Australia (1885-1887 and 1892-93). © National Library of Australia NOVEMBER 2009 In the last six months, my curiosity about the extent to which governments in Adelaide condoned or turned a blind eye to frontier massacres in the Gulf Country of the Northern Territory, up until 1910, has led me to fresh evidence that has shocked me. It has unsettled the world I thought I knew. I was born in Adelaide, a fourth-generation South Australian, and have resided there for much of my life. The city’s cathedrals and fine old buildings are very familiar to me. When I was young, I heard or read in newspapers the names of the old and powerful families, but took little notice. Even now, I feel uneasy revealing all that I have uncovered. In 1881, a massive pastoral boom commenced in the top half of the Northern Territory, administered by the colonial government in Adelaide.1 Elsey Station on the Roper River – romanticised in Jeannie Gunn’s We of the Never Never – was the first to be established. 2 These were huge stations, with an average size of almost 16,000 square kilometres. By the end of the year the entire Gulf district (an area the size of Victoria, which accounted for a quarter of the Territory’s pastoral country) had been leased to just 14 landholders, all but two of whom were wealthy businessmen and investors from the eastern colonies.2 Once they had taken up their lease, landholders had only three years to comply with a minimum stocking rate. -
Senior Home Owners Learn Best Uses for Home Equity Local Voters
Summit Heralcl ... Summit's only real newspaper VOLUME 98 NO. 14 November 10,1984 Price: 25' Senior home owners learn best uses for home equity nyPEGTHURLER older being home owners. Twen- pay for home improvements or 3)lioine-matching programs AREA — Senior home owners ty percent live in renlal units, and repairs. Such a plan may mean where better use can be made of arc increasingly rich in equity and only five percent are housed in that low or no interest is paid, existing housing; and 4)accessory poor in cash, according to senior nursing homes or under custodial and no payments are due until the apartments; where a private unit housing consultants speaking at plans. homeowner dies or sells his is installed inside a private home. the Housing Conference for Seniors learned how to best home. Carol Hertweck, Summit, was Union County senior citizens last make use of their equity, Echo housing a committee member of the Con- Saturday at the F. Edward through: l)Loan plans involving Topics similar to those being ference, which featured speakers Bierteumpfel Senior Center in reverse mortgages, offering home discussed by Summit's Planning Leo Baldwin, coordinator of Union. owners the opportunity to ex- Board relating to senior housing housing programs, American Summit's Mary Burger was a change housing equity for cash in the Master Plan being up- Association of Retired Persons, delegate to the Conference as a and continue to occupy their dated, were on the Conference and Leon Harper, Housing Con- representative of the Senior home; 2)Salc plans, where the agenda such as l)echo housing- a sultant, ARP. -
Beaver Briefs Tables of Contents
Beaver Briefs Tables of Contents Vol 1 No 1 Letter to State Archives Marion County Marriage Records Benton County Census 1860 Garris House Society and Constitution Queries Vol 1 No 2 Current Events Marion County Marriage Records Polk County Marriage Records Yamhill County Military Records Linn County Cemeteries Benton County Census 1860 Queries Vol 1 No 3 Society News State Fair Marion County Marriage Records Polk County Marriage Records Dayton, Yamill Co. Benton Co. Interview Benton County Census 1860 Queries Vol 1 No 4 Queries Some notes on the Willamette Valley p2 Marion County Marriage Records (continued) p 3 The Leabo Incident p 8 Polk County Marriage Records (continued)p 9 Queries p13 This and that p15 Vol 2 No 1 Some Notes on Salem (including some early names p2 Marion County Marriage Records, continued (1964, 1865) p.4 Polk County Marriage Records, continued (1866-1869) p.7 Willamette Valley Genealogical Society Charter Members and a brief surname register p.11 Beaver Briefs Tables of Contents Queries p.16 This and That p.19 Vol 2 No 2 Oregana p1 Yamhill County Marriage Records 1857-1860 p3 Some Marriages Taken From the Oregon Spectator 1846-1850 p7 A listing of grooms, Polk County whose residence was not Polk County p10 Benton County 1860 census (continued) p11 Queries p15 This and that p18 Vol 2 No 3 We went to the state fair p1 To start your own genealogy p3 Family Group sheet (form) p4 Can you help?, silhouettes p11 Queries p13 This and that p19 Vol 2 No 4 Yamhill County Marriage Records 1861-1865 p1 Polk County Marriage Records (continued) p5 Cemetery Index, Marion, Polk, Benton, Lincoln, Yamhill, Linn, Lane, Washington, Clackamas. -
A Note on the Marriagr of Richard Duke of The
140 MARRIAGJ<J OF RICHARD DUKE OF THE NORMANS. 141 It is unnecessary here to go into the mazes of conjecture which have been offered to explain some of these relationships, but it is impossible A NOTE ON THE MARRIAGR OF RICHARD DUKE OF to disregard the fmggestion of M. Fran~ois Isidore Licquet, in his THE NORMANS WITH ADELA OF FRANCE. Histoire de .Norrnanilie,4 that Adela of France mother of Matilda was not the same Adela who married the Norman duke Richard. His In the course of some recent enquiries into the gencu.!ogy of the ground for this, passing by his contention, doubtless just, that the Norman Counts of Rauen, it wu ..'! observed that modern writers have Norman bride wns plainly of mnrri11goablcage, is in brief that the very genemlly set forth the statement tlmt the fifth Count 01· Duke of marriage covenant of thnt bride clons not specially assert her royal the Normans, Richard III surnamed the Y uu11g or Junior, wu ..'l parentage; nor, in words, say anything about her parentage, which is married or contracted to Adela, -fi1Lughter of Hobert the Devout, King at best only 1t negative argument. He might have added that the of France. It seems that this statement is the result of a curious Flemish chroniclers, who are not very easily read, do not apparently cornbination of misapprehensions, and that grounds can be found for mention anywhere that the French Adela Countess of Flanders had rejecting the assertion as an impossibility. been previously married to the Norman, but that is only in accordance There is not much doubt that in this case no small part of the with the usual practice of tlmt period, as illustrated by the Encomium difficulty arises from the fact that very little can be known of these Emnu», which amongst other similar flatteries terms that mother personages. -
Politics, the Judiciary Act of 1789, and the Invention of the Federal Courts
Duke Law Journal VOLUME 1989 DECEMBER NUMBER 6 "TO ESTABLISH JUSTICE": POLITICS, THE JUDICIARY ACT OF 1789, AND THE INVENTION OF THE FEDERAL COURTS WYTHE HOLT* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Why Do We Have the National Judiciary We Have? . 1422 A. Unnoticed National JudiciaryPuzzles .................. 1422 * University Research Professor of Law, University of Alabama School of Law. B.A., 1963, Amherst College; J.D., 1966, Ph.D., 1979, University of Virginia. This essay is copyrighted by the author, who reserves all rights thereto. The author is grateful to Dean Nathaniel Hansford and the University of Alabama School of Law for their generous support of several years of research that forms the basis of this essay, and for a sabbatical leave that also in part supported the research for this essay. The author is most grateful to Charlene Bickford, Kenneth Bowling, Helen Veit, and their colleagues at the Documentary His- tory of the First Congress project at George Washington University, who graciously made available their magnificent collection of materials and have been kind enough to advise, assist, and cheer the author on many occasions. The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Jim Buchanan, Christine Jordan, Maeva Marcus, Jim Perry, Steven Tull, and their associates at the Documentary History of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1800 project, for generously giving time, advice, and expertise, and allowing the author to supplement his research for this essay with their fine collection. William Casto, Eugene Genovese, L.H. La Rue, and Sandra Van Burkleo commented generously, helpfully, and often persuasively upon earlier drafts. Finally, the author gratefully ac- knowledges the expert aid, pleasantness, and unfailing good cheer extended to the author by the many librarians and research aides at the numerous repositories cited in this essay.