NMECA Report 2012-2017 121117 Oa.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NMECA Report 2012-2017 121117 Oa.Pdf Report on the Management PROTECTING Effectiveness and KEY BIODIVERSITY AREAS Capacity through Better Management and Protected Area Enactment of Protected Areas in the Philippines Imprint As a federally owned enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. This project is part of the International Climate Initiative (IKI). The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) supports this initiative on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag. Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn GIZ-BMUB Office Quezon City, Philippines T +63 2 426 02 39 E: [email protected] I: www.giz.de Responsible Berthold Schirm Protected Area Management Enhancement (PAME) Project Principal Advisor and Program Coordinator E: [email protected] Authors: Rhea Claire Madarang, Andre Jon Uychiaoco, Berthold Schirm, Aldrin Mallari and Eddie Quitoriano, Manila Philippines Design and Layout: Ryan G. Palacol and Opalyn Agulay, Manila Philippines Photo credits/sources: All photos herein are by GIZ and of its partners, unless indicated otherwise. Maps: The map printed here is intended only for information purposes and in no way constitutes recognition under international law of boundaries and territories. GIZ accepts no responsibility for the map being entirely up to date, correct or complete. All liability for any damage, direct or indirect, resulting from its use is excluded. GIZ is responsible for the content of this publication. Place and date of publication: Manila, Philippines, 2017 PROTECTING KEY BIODIVERSITY AREAS through Better Management and Protected Area Enactment Report on the Management Effectiveness and Capacity of Protected Areas in the Philippines TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables & Figures iv 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS 1 1.1 Management effectiveness increase in 60 existing PAs and 3 55 new protected areas established have contributed to the Philippine Development Plan 2011-2016’s goals 1.2 Recommendations to sustain increasing management 3 effectiveness and conservation outcomes 2 BACKGROUND AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE 5 2.1 Increase in global human well-being has been impacting the 6 environment 2.2 Nations around the world commit to protect biodiversity and 6 sustain human development 2.3 Protected areas are a proven tool for environmental conservation 8 and economic growth 2.4 Biodiversity-rich and vulnerable Philippines acting to conserve 9 biodiversity and to contribute to human development 2.5 Need to improve management of existing PAs and establish new 10 ones in biodiversity-rich areas 3 THE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT ENHANCEMENT 12 PROJECT 3.1 Aim to increase management effectiveness in 60 protected areas 13 and establish 100 new protected areas in Key Biodiversity Areas 3.2 Situational analysis: Need for improved legislation, basis 15 (ecosystem services benefits from PAs), partnerships, resources, capacity and information for more effective PA management 3.3 Approach: Programmatic capacity development including 16 mentoring until delivery of outputs 3.4 Approach: Supporting a national roadmap and framework to 17 improve coordination between national and local PA planning 3.5 Approach: Providing assistance to priority KBAs in need of 18 support and those with underrepresented ecosystems (e.g. caves and freshwater) through a Partnership Fund to support local PA-specific initiatives and expert monitoring in pilot-testing the integrated ridge-to-reef planning approach for establishing PAs 4 RESULTS 19 4.1 Average management effectiveness increased in more than 60 20 existing PAs and 55 new PAs were established 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38 5.1 The Project has generally achieved its objectives and contributed 39 to the PDP 2011-2016 5.2 Sustain and take forward gains 39 6 GOOD PRACTICES: PAME STORIES ON THE GROUND 41 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND ANNEXES 48 LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES Table 1. PAME Project Outcome Indicators 13 Table 2. PAME Capacity Development Program Topics 17 Table 3. Total number of hectarage of PAME supported PA sites 20 Table 4. PAME Project Outcome Indicators with Results 21 Table 5. List of 64 existing Protected Areas (PAME 60) with their Total METT 23 scores in 2013 and 2017 Table 6. List of 100 new and proposed Protected Areas (PAME 100) with their 25 Total METT or MEAT scores Table 7. Number of sites reporting various dimensions of improved protection 35 of species biodiversity Table 8. Summary of analysis based on the six elements of PA management. 36 Figure 1. PAME Project site map 14 Figure 2: Spiderweb graph showing PAME 60 and PAME 100 scores 22 from 2013 to 2017 Figure 3. PAME Capacity Development 31 iv Report on the Management Effectiveness and Capacity of Protected Areas in the Philippines EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Protecting Key Biodiversity Areas through Better Management and Protected Area Enactment 1 The world’s growing population and economy are causing adverse impacts to the environment, that, when not decisively addressed, will have irreversible effects on the planet by 2050. Massive deforestation, land degradation, and destruction of coral reefs, among other environmental stressors, continue, also dramatically affecting people’s livelihoods. Climate change only worsens the impact. The United Nations (UN) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), though, recognize that economic progress and environmental conservation can go hand in hand. With this urgent need for immediate and large-scale action for the environment, countries around the world committed to the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in 2011 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals in 2015. Aichi Target #11 particularly aims to have at least 17% of terrestrial and inland water and 10% of coastal and marine areas in the world conserved through effectively managed protected areas. Establishing protected areas (PAs) is a key solution to achieve both environmental protection and sustainable economic growth. When properly managed, a PA’s flora and fauna are well- preserved. And, as these flora and fauna thrive, ecosystem goods and services for humans’ sustenance and livelihood ideally become more available in the future. In the Philippines, one of the world’s 17 mega-biodiverse countries and among the most vulnerable to biodiversity loss and climate change, the 2011-2016 Philippine Development Plan (PDP) specifically targeted: 1) strengthening management effectiveness of 2 million hectares (6.7%) of terrestrial and 1.1 million hectares (0.5%) of marine areas through existing national protected areas (PAs), and 2) establishing and effectively managing an additional 0.3 million hectares of critical habitats. The Philippines is also implementing the 2015-2028 Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (PBSAP), which is in line with the Aichi Targets’ vision for biodiversity by 2020. The Protected Area Management Enhancement (PAME) in the Philippines Project aimed to improve the management effectiveness in 60 existing protected areas (PAs) in the Philippines and establish 100 new protected areas in Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). The project began in October 2012 and will end in December 2017. It is implemented by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources through its Biodiversity Management Bureau (DENR-BMB) in partnership with the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) through the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. With a funding of 9 million euros from the German government and 1 million euros from Philippine partners, PAME is a unique scaling-up initiative: the only conservation project worldwide targeting to strengthen such a large number of PA sites within a short amount of time. Specifically, PAME aimed to: 1) Improve management and technical capacities of DENR, protected area staff and key partners 2) Support the improvement of protected area management in at least 60 existing terrestrial and marine protected areas in defined key biodiversity areas (KBAs) through improved plans, legal frameworks, financial plans, and monitoring systems 3) Support the establishment of at least 100 new protected areas under innovative conservation management systems (for example, those led by local governments and communities) 4) Support an improved knowledge management and awareness-raising for PA management and value of biodiversity conservation 2 Report on the Management Effectiveness and Capacity of Protected Areas in the Philippines In selecting project sites, PAME considered those which did not receive support from international organizations or large corporations, and more particularly, 60 PAs which are in or near KBAs (PAME 60), and 100 KBAs from underrepresented ecosystems among current PAs, like caves, rivers, and lakes, among others (PAME 100). Other PAME 100 sites were directly selected as part of the Integrated Ecosystem Management (IEM)-based Comprehensive Land Use Planning (CLUP). Management effectiveness increase in 60 existing PAs and 55 new 1.1 protected areas established have contributed to the Philippine Development Plan 2011-2016’s goals PAME generally achieved its main goals: Average METT scores of 64 existing national protected areas increased from 34% in 2013 to 49% this 2017. This is a 46% increase, higher than the targeted 30% increase. Although only
Recommended publications
  • Rattanewsletter No. 2
    The Official News Bulletin of the ITTO PD 334/05 Rev. 2 (I) No. 2 Vol. 1 June 2007 ISSN 1908-5974 ITTO– Philippines—ASEAN Rattan Project First Project Steering Committee Held The 1st Project Steering Committee ( PSC ) Meeting for the ITTO-Philippines-ASEAN Rattan Project was held on 21 February 2007 at the Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau ( ERDB ) Conference Room, College, Laguna, Philippines. It was chaired by the Pro- ject Director and Director of the ERDB Forester Marcial C. Amaro, Jr. The committee members in attendance were: For. Eriberto C. Argete ( Department of Environment and Natural Re- sources ) , Dr. Lauren Flejzor ( ITTO Representative ) , For. Ester Cadiz ( represented For. Romeo Acosta of the Forest Management Bureau ) , Dr. Florence P. Soriano ( Forest Prod- ucts Research and Development Institute) and Dean Ramon A. Razal ( College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines at Los Baños ) . The Project Management Team composed of Dr. Aida B. Lapis ( Deputy Project Director and Leader Research Compo- nent ) , Dr. Merlyn Carmelita N. Rivera ( Project Leader, Production Aspect and Leader, Net- working Component ) , Dr. Magdalena Giron ( Project Leader, Utilization Aspect and Leader, Training Component) , Dr. Armando M. Palijon ( Leader, Pilot Demonstration Component ) and For. Imelda C. Pangga ( Database Administrator ) participated during the meet- ing together with Dr. Florentino O. Tesoro, Technical Consultant on Utilization. The other members of the project team namely: Ms. Norma Pablo, For. Kharina G. Bueser, For. Gregorio E. Santos, Jr., and For. Moreno L. Santander ( Philippine Contact Person ) also attended the meeting. The Project ’ s objectives, outputs and detailed work and financial plans, organiza- IN THIS ISSUE tional chart and progress report were presented by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • DENR-BMB Atlas of Luzon Wetlands 17Sept14.Indd
    Philippine Copyright © 2014 Biodiversity Management Bureau Department of Environment and Natural Resources This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the Copyright holder provided acknowledgement of the source is made. BMB - DENR Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife Center Compound Quezon Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City Philippines 1101 Telefax (+632) 925-8950 [email protected] http://www.bmb.gov.ph ISBN 978-621-95016-2-0 Printed and bound in the Philippines First Printing: September 2014 Project Heads : Marlynn M. Mendoza and Joy M. Navarro GIS Mapping : Rej Winlove M. Bungabong Project Assistant : Patricia May Labitoria Design and Layout : Jerome Bonto Project Support : Ramsar Regional Center-East Asia Inland wetlands boundaries and their geographic locations are subject to actual ground verification and survey/ delineation. Administrative/political boundaries are approximate. If there are other wetland areas you know and are not reflected in this Atlas, please feel free to contact us. Recommended citation: Biodiversity Management Bureau-Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 2014. Atlas of Inland Wetlands in Mainland Luzon, Philippines. Quezon City. Published by: Biodiversity Management Bureau - Department of Environment and Natural Resources Candaba Swamp, Candaba, Pampanga Guiaya Argean Rej Winlove M. Bungabong M. Winlove Rej Dumacaa River, Tayabas, Quezon Jerome P. Bonto P. Jerome Laguna Lake, Laguna Zoisane Geam G. Lumbres G. Geam Zoisane
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status and Prospects of Protected Areas in the Light of the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation Priorities
    Proceedings of IUCN/WCPA-EA-4 Taipei Conference March 18-23, 2002, Taipei, Taiwan CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF PROTECTED AREAS IN THE LIGHT OF THE PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PRIORITIES Perry S. Ong, Ph. D. Fellow, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, CI Science Director, Conservation International Philippines Associate Professor, Institute of Biology, UP Diliman I. INTRODUCTION The Philippines, the world’s second largest archipelago after Indonesia, covers a land area of about 300,000 km2 [1]. It is one of the 17 megadiversity countries, which between themselves contain 70 to 80 percent of global biodiversity [2]. Philippine rainforest is home to more than 1130 terrestrial wildlife species (Table 1) and between 10,000-13,000 species of plants [3] so far recorded, of which more than half are found nowhere else in the world. As such, the Philippines has also been described as Galapagos times ten [4]. It is also one of 25 global biodiversity hotspots [5, 6] with more than 97 percent of its original forest cover lost [7, 8]. In fact more original forests were lost in the last 50 years of the 20th century than what was lost in the previous 450 years combined [9]. Yet more new species are still being discovered on these islands than any other areas on earth in recent times [e.g., see 10, 11] Table 1. Diversity, endemism and conservation status of Philippine wildlife [11, 12, 13 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] No. of No. of Endemic % No. of No. of Threatened Species Species endemics Endemic Species Threatened Species Amphibians 101+ 79+ 78% 24 24 Reptiles 258+ 170+ 66% 8 4 Birds 5761 195+1 34% 74 59 Mammals 204+1, 2 111+1 54% 51 41 Total 1139+ 555+1 49% 157 128 95 Legend: + includes new species (38 species of amphibians, 35 species of reptiles; 15 species of mammals); 1 includes rediscovered species 2 25 species of dolphins, whales and dugong The country’s marine waters cover 2.21 M km2 with a coastline of 22,450 km and an estimated 27,000 km2 of coral reefs [21].
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Resources in the Philippines and the Extent of Poverty in the Sector
    Aquatic resources in the Philippines and the extent of poverty in the sector Item Type monograph Authors Rivera, R.; Turcotte, D.; Boyd-Hagart, A.; Pangilinan, J.; Santos, R. Publisher Support to Regional Aquatic Resources Management (STREAM) Download date 04/10/2021 13:50:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/20137 Aquatic resources in the Philippines and the extent of poverty in the sector May 2002 Table of contents List of tables.......................................................................................................vi List of figures ....................................................................................................vii Abbreviations...................................................................................................viii 1 Introduction..................................................................................................1 2 Status of aquatic resources in the Philippines .........................................2 2.1 Marine resources ...............................................................................................2 2.1.1 Coral reefs .............................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2 Seagrasses and seaweeds...................................................................................... 4 2.2 Inland resources.................................................................................................5 2.2.1 Mangroves and brackish water ponds.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Philippines
    Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Philippines ANNEX September 2011 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) CRE CR(5) 11-014 Table of Contents IUCN Red List of the Philippines (2007) Red List of the Philippine Red Data Book,1997 Threatened Species by the National Laws Philippine Fauna and Flora under CITES APPENDIX, 2011 Protected Areas under the NIPAS Act in the Philippines (as of June, 2011) Environmental Standards CDM Projects in the Philippines (as of March 31, 2011) Project Grouping Matrix for Determination of EIA Report Type EIA Coverage & Requirements Screening Checklists Outlines of Required Documents by PEISS IUCN Red List of the Philippines ,2007 IUCN Red List of the Philippines (2007) # Scientific Name Common Name Category Mammals 1 Acerodon jubatus GOLDEN-CAPPED FRUIT BAT EN 2 Acerodon leucotis PALAWAN FRUIT BAT VU 3 Alionycteris paucidentata MINDANAO PYGMY FRUIT BAT VU 4 Anonymomys mindorensis MINDORO CLIMBING RAT VU 5 Apomys sacobianus LONG-NOSED LUZON FOREST MOUSE VU 6 Apomys gracilirostris LARGE MINDORO FOREST MOUSE VU 7 Archboldomys luzonensis MT ISAROG SHREW-MOUSE EN 8 Axis calamianensis CALAMANIAN DEER EN 9 Bubalus mindorensis MINDORO DWARF BUFFALO CR 10 Cervus alfredi PHILLIPINE SPOTTED DEER EN 11 Chrotomys gonzalesi ISAROG STRIPED SHREW-RAT, CR 12 Chrotomys whiteheadi LUZON STRIPED RAT VU 13 Crateromys australis DINAGAT BUSHY-TAILED CLOUD RAT EN 14 Crateromys schadenbergi GIANT BUSHY-TAILED CLOUD RAT VU 15 Crateromys paulus OILIN BUSHY-TAILED CLOUD RAT CR 16 Crateromys heaneyi PANAY BUSHY-TAILED
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics
    Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics 2002 Republika ng Pilipinas PAMBANSANG LUPON SA UGNAYANG PANG-ESTADISTIKA (NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD) November 2002 The Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics (CPES) 2002 is a publication prepared by the Environment Accounts Division of the Economic Statistics Office of the NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD (NSCB). For technical inquiries, please direct calls at: (632) 899-3444. Please direct your subscription and inquiries to the: NATIONAL STATISTICAL INFORMATION CENTER National Statistical Coordination Board Ground Floor Midland Buendia Bldg., 403 Sen. Gil J. Puyat Avenue, Makati City Tel nos.: Telefax nos.: (632) 895-2767 (632) 890-8456 (632) 890-9405 e-mail address: [email protected] ([email protected]) ([email protected]) website: http://www.nscb.gov.ph The NSIC is a one-stop shop of statistical information and services in the Philippines. Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics 2002 November 2002 Republika ng Pilipinas PAMBANSANG LUPON SA UGNAYANG PANG-ESTADISTIKA (NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD) FOREWORD This is the second edition of the Compendium of Philippine Environment Statistics. The compendium is a compilation of statistical information collected from data produced by various government agencies and from data available in different statistical publications. The compilation of statistical data in this compendium is based on the Philippine Framework of Environment Statistics (PFDES) which in turn is based on the United Nations Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics. It covers data for the period 1992 to 2000, whenever possible. Latest figures presented vary depending on the availability of data. The PFDES provides a systematic approach to the development of environment statistics and is an instrument for compiling and integrating data coming from various data collecting institutions to make them more useful in the formulation and evaluation of socio-economic and environmental programs and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverpage RPFP Vol 2 Updated
    REGION IV-A (CALABARZON) REGIONAL PHYSICAL FRAMEWORK PLAN 2004-2030 (Volume 2 - Physical and Socio-Economic Profile and Situational Analysis) Philippine Copyright @ 2008 National Economic and Development Authority Regional Office IV-A (CALABARZON) Printed in Quezon City, Philippines Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures List of Acronyms Acknowledgement Other Sources of Data/Information A. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 1.1 Location and Political Subdivision 2 1.2 Land Area and Land Classification 3 1.3 Topography 4 1.4 Slope 5 1.5 Soil physiology and suitability 6 1.6 Rock type and their distribution 9 1.7 Climate 9 1.8 Water Resources 10 1.9 Mineral Resources 10 1.10 Volcanoes 13 2 LAND USE 2.1 Production Land Use 14 2.1.1 Agricultural Land 14 a. Existing Agricultural Land Use in the NPAAAD b. Existing Land Use of the SAFDZ iii Table of Contents 2.1.2 Livestock and Poultry Production Areas 18 2.1.3 Fishery Resources 20 a. Major Fishing Grounds b. Municipal Fishing c. Municipal Fisherfolks 2.1.4 Highlight of Agricultural Performance and 21 Food Sufficiency a. Crops, Livestock and Poultry b. Fishing Production Performance c. Food Sufficiency Level\Feed Sufficiency 2.1.5 Agrarian Reform Areas 23 a. Land Acquisition and Distribution b. Agrarian Reform Communities (ARCs) 2.1.6 Mineral Resources 25 a. Metallic Minerals b. Non-Metallic Minerals c. Mining Permits Issues 2.1.7 Industrial Development Areas 28 a. Industrial Center b. Ecozones 2.1.8 Tourism 34 a. Tourism Areas b. Foreign and Domestic Tourist Travel Movements 2.2 Protection Land Use 40 2.2.1 National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) 40 a.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biophysical Assessment of the Philippine Territory of the Sulu
    A Biophysical Assessment of the Philippine Territory of the Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion Program WWF-Philippines May 2003 CREDITS AUTHORS: Angel Alcala, Ph.D. Monyeen Alava, M.Sc. Emmanuel Anglo, Ph.D. Naniel Aragones, Ph.D. Emmanuel Bate, M.Sc. Flordeliz Guarin, Ph.D. Rudolf Hermes, Ph.D. Daniel Lagunzad, Ph.D. Augustus Rex Montebon, M.Sc. Ramon Miclat Jose Angelito Palma Johanna Pe-Montebon Hildie Maria Nacorda, M.Sc. Teresita Perez, Ph.D. Gavino Trono, Jr., Ph.D. Arnel Andrew Yaptinchay, D.V.M. EDITORS: Johanna Pe-Montebon, Evangeline F.B. Miclat, M.Sc., and Jose Noel Dumaup TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS: Josephine Sumangil-Evangelista and Dino Leoncarlo Calderon INTEGRATOR: Johanna Pe-Montebon TECHNICAL ADVISERS/REVIEWERS: Alan White, Ph.D., Angel Alcala, Ph.D., and Romeo Trono ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The Biophysical Assessment of the Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion is funded by WWF-US. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Credits............................................................................................................................. 1 Table of Contents....................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ............................................................................................................. 5 List of Tables ............................................................................................................... 7 List of Appendices ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Monitoring System (EIMS);
    Sustaining our Coasts: The Ridge-to-Reef Approach A Compilation of Technical and Policy Papers User Fees and Resource Rents Sustaining our Coasts: The Ridge-to-Reef Approach A Compilation of Technical and Policy Papers User Fees and Resource Rents By Department of Environment and Natural Resources Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau, Coastal and Marine Management Office Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife Center, North Avenue, Quezon City and Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project (ICRMP) 2013 Printed in Manila, Philippines Citation: Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 2013. Sustaining our Coasts: The Ridge-to-Reef Approach -- A Compilation of Technical and Policy Papers: User Fees and Resource Rents. Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project (ICRMP) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Quezon City, Philippines, 126 p. This publication is made possible through funding assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB Loan No. 2311-PHI) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF Grant No. 0071-PHI). This publication may be reproduced or quoted in other publications as long as proper reference is made to the source. Photo Credits: Front Cover: Chen Reyes-Mencias ISBN 978-971-8986-91-2 Table of Contents ICRMP Background v Foreword ix Director, DENR-PAWB Message xi Undersecretary and Chief of Staff, DENR Message xiii Secretary, DENR Introduction xv Executive Director, DENR-PAWB-CMMO About the Papers xvii User Fees and Resource Rents for 1 Major Coastal Habitats Acknowledgements 126 ICRMP Background cosystems are interconnected; what happens in one will ultimately affect the other. Forest EXPECTED OUTCOME denudation, for example, results in soil erosion Sustainable Management of Ecausing siltation of rivers and estuaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Pres. Duterte Allocates P500 Million for Typhoon Nina Rehab in Bicol
    October - December 2016 Vol. 25 No. 4 President Rodrigo LGU Sorsogon Duterte meets the local chief executives and selected wins P1million as farmers of Camarines Sur “Be Riceponsible” at the Provincial Capitol in Cadlan, Pili, Camarines Sur, advocacy champion three days after typhoon Nina ravaged Bicol. Photo The provincial government shows President Duterte of Sorsogon, Bicol’s lone entry consulting agriculture to the DA-Philippine Rice secretary Manny F. Piñol on Research Institute (PhilRice) DA’s rehabilitation funds. nationwide BeRiceponsible Search for Best Advocacy Campaign was adjudged as champion under the Provincial Government category and won P1 Million cash prize. Hazel V. Antonio, director Pres. Duterte allocates P500 million of the Be RICEponsible campaign led the awarding ceremony which was held at for typhoon Nina rehab in Bicol PhilRice in Nueva Ecija on by Emily B. Bordado (Please turn to page 15) Typhoon Nina devastated three Bicol provinces and wrought heavy damage on the agriculture sector. FULL FLEDGED. Final damage report shows that the number of Agriculture farmers affected from the province of Camarines Sur, Secretary Catanduanes and Albay is 86,735. Of this, 73,757 are rice Emmanuel farmers; 8,387 corn farmers and 4,002 are high value F. Piñol crop farmers. The value of production loss is estimated administered at over P5.1 billion. the oath of office to The total rice area affected planting anew. The assistance our beloved is 59,528.23 hectare; for corn will be in the form of palay Regional 12,727.17 hectare and for seeds to be distributed to the Executive high value crops including affected farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rattan Conference Proceedings
    ITTO PD 334/05 Rev. 2 (I) Demonstration and Application of Production and Utilization Technologies for Rattan Sustainable Development in the ASEAN Member Countries Regional Rattan Conference Proceedings Dusit Thani Hotel, Ayala Centre Makati City, Philippines August 29 - September 1, 2010 Regional Rattan Conference Proceedings 1 2 Demonstration and Application of Production and Utilization Technologies for Rattan Sustainable Development in the ASEAN Member Countries TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page List of Acronyms 5 Executive Summary 6 Project Background 7 About the Conference 8 Objectives 8 Schedule of Activities and Venue 9 Participants 9 Opening Programme 10 Welcome Remarks 10 Inspirational Message 11 Message 13 Keynote Address 14 Technical Presentation 16 Rattan Diversity: How much do we know and how much is there to be discovered? by Dr. J.R. Dransfield 16 Open Forum 21 Country Reports 22 Rattan Pilot Demonstration Establishment and Management 22 Cambodia 22 Indonesia 23 Lao PDR 23 Open Forum 24 Myanmar 26 Philippines (Bicol) 27 Philippines (Kidapawan) 28 Open Forum 29 Book Launching 31 A Field Guide to Philippine Rattans 31 The ASEAN Rattans 32 Recapitulation of Day 1 Conference Proper 33 Continuation of Country Reports 34 Thailand 34 Vietnam 35 Regional Rattan Conference Proceedings 3 Technical Presentation 36 Experience in the Establishment of Pilot Demonstration in SEA by Dr. A.M. Palijon 36 Open Forum 59 Technical Presentation 60 Rattan RDE Directions in the Next Decade by Dr. F.O. Tesoro 60 Open Forum 62 Presentation of Research
    [Show full text]
  • PROTECTED AREAS and WILDLIFE BUREAU Program
    Department: ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Agency/Bureau/Office: PROTECTED AREAS AND WILDLIFE BUREAU Program/Project/Activity: 1.a & 2.a General Management and Supervision/ Implementation & Monitoring PERFORMANCE CY 2013 PROGRAM/ACTIVITY/PROJECT REMARKS INDICATORS TARGET ACCOMPLISHMENT 1.a GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 1.a.1 Provisions for mandatory expenses 1.a.2 Provide general administration and support services 2. SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS 2.a FORMULATION AND MONITORING OF ENR SECTOR POLICIES, PLANS, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS 1. Formulation/preparation of policy/guidelines/rules & regulations for biodiversity conservation and dev't of protected areas 1.1 Preparation/Finalization of policies/guidelines No. of policies/guidelines prepared/finalized 8 23 a. PA Management 1. Guidelines for issuance of Programmatic EIAs in Protected Areas 1 2. Resettlement of Protected Area migrants 1 1 Endorsed to the Office of Secretary (OSEC) the guidelines on Procedure on the Resettlement of Protected Occupants in Appropriate Sites on December 12 2013 3. Establishment and management of bufferzones 1 1 Guidelines of buffer zones establishment and management in PA was submitted to PTWG-DENR on November 29, 2013. Conducted consultation with Local Government Units (LGUs) re Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUPs), local development and investment plans in support to bufferzones on November 28-29, 2013. b. Cave Management Program 4. Ban on Importation/Exportation of Speleothems 1 1 Re-filed in the Senate the Bill on Ban of Importation/Exportation of Speleothems 5. Cave Ecotourism 1 1 Submitted the DMC on Cave Ecotourism Development and Implementation to DENR on November 12 2013; With Usec Adobo's Office since November 2013 6.
    [Show full text]