DOCSLIB.ORG

Epichloë Typhina (Fungus)-Botanophila Lobata (Fly) Interaction: an Invasive" Pollinator" System in Its Introduced Range in Western Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epichloë Typhina (Fungus)-Botanophila Lobata (Fly) Interaction: an Invasive AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Joseph M. Kaser for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology presented on December 1, 2009. Title: Epichloë typhina (fungus) - Botanophila lobata (fly) Interaction: An Invasive "Pollinator" System in its Introduced Range in Western Oregon. Abstract approved: _____________________________________________________________________ Sujaya Rao Epichloë typhina (Ascomycetes: Clavicipitaceae) is an endophytic fungus that infects perennial Pooid grasses and is the causal agent of choke disease. It is endemic to Europe and was inadvertently introduced into orchardgrass seed production fields in western Oregon. Choke disease, which was first recorded in Oregon in 1996, currently infects ~90% of cultivated orchardgrass seed fields in the region, resulting in yield losses >65%. Infective propagules (i.e. ascospores) are produced sexually by the bipolar heterothallic fungus and gamete outcross has been shown to be facilitated in the wild by Botanophila spp. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), including Botanophila lobata. The fly - fungus interaction is generally considered to be one of obligatory mutualism based on studies conducted in areas endemism. However, recent evidence suggests that the fungus is able to sexually outcross in cultivated Oregon orchardgrass fields without the aid of fly "pollinators." Additionally, ascosporic fertilization has recently been implicated as an alternative mechanism for gamete transfer and might have important impacts on fungal reproduction in Oregon. The objectives of this study were to: 1) explore how two tightly linked species, which appear to have an obligate mutualistic relationship in areas of endemism, interact in a non-native context; 2) quantitatively examine the seasonal and diurnal presence of E. typhina ascospores in a cultivated Oregon orchardgrass field; and 3) test alternative transfer mechanisms of fungal spermatia for E. typhina. To address objective 1), the spatial variability and reproductive success of E. typhina and B. lobata were estimated during surveys of ten cultivated orchardgrass fields in 2008 and four fields in 2009. Fungal distributions were spatially aggregated at five of the study sites in 2008 and three in 2009. Fly distributions were spatially aggregated at three sites in 2008 and one in 2009. Botanophila lobata density exhibited a positive linear relationship with E. typhina density, suggestive of positive density dependence of fly oviposition with fungal density. However, fungal reproductive success was not affected by fly density or fungal density within the range of distributions observed in this study. To address objective 2), airborne ascospores were monitored in a single cultivated orchardgrass field during 2008 and 2009 using a Burkard volumetric spore trap. Ascospore production began in early to middle May and continued into late July during both years of the study. Daily ascospore production exhibited a circadian rhythm, with production peaking on average at 1:08 am and 12:36 am, in 2008 and 2009, respectively. The prolonged duration and high intensity of ascospore production during the growing season suggest a large window within which new plants are at risk to infection, and within which preventative management strategies must be adopted. To address objective 3), splash fertilization, contact fertilization and B. lobata fertilization were tested in the greenhouse. Although only two replicates were completed, both contact and splash fertilization appeared to be viable mechanisms of sexual outcross for E. typhina. The results of this study strongly indicate that E. typhina can successfully reproduce without the presence of B. lobata. Splash and contact fertilization, as well as ascosporic fertilization, provide opportunities for reproduction of the fungus in absence of fly pollinators. It appears that the fly - fungus interaction has shifted from an obligatory mutualism to facultative mutualism or simple fungivory within the introduced range in western Oregon. ©Copyright by Joseph M. Kaser December 1, 2009 All Rights Reserved Epichloë typhina (fungus) - Botanophila lobata (fly) Interaction: An Invasive "Pollinator" System in its Introduced Range in Western Oregon by Joseph M. Kaser A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Presented December 1, 2009 Commencement June 2010 Master of Science thesis of Joseph M. Kaser presented on December 1, 2009. APPROVED: _____________________________________________________________________ Major Professor, representing Entomology _____________________________________________________________________ Director of the Entomology Graduate Program _____________________________________________________________________ Dean of the Graduate School I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. _____________________________________________________________________ Joseph M. Kaser, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express sincere appreciation my major professor, Dr. Sujaya Rao. I would not have made it this far without her dedicated advice and insightful criticism. I thank my graduate committee members, Dr. Elizabeth Borer, Dr. Peter McEvoy and Dr. Patricia Muir, whose enthusiasm and support of this thesis was invaluable. I would like to show my gratitude to Dr. Steve Alderman from the USDA ARS National Forage Seed Production Research Center in Corvallis for sharing his time and expertise with me throughout my degree at Oregon State University. I would like to thank Kim Skyrm, Jen Bergh, Sarah Maxfield-Taylor, Missie Scherr, Melissa McKenney, Kathy Ackerman, George Hoffman, and Angela Gadino for helping with my research and making this process more than just a thesis. Thanks to Dr. Joey Spatafora and Ryan Kepler for their help with DNA extraction and PCR. Thanks to the Orchardgrass Commission, Oregon Grass Seed Council, Grass Seed Cropping Systems for Sustainable Agriculture for funding this research. And I would like to thank Chelsea Pearsall. I owe her one, big time. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Ruth and Steve Kaser because I know they would be happy with me whether I wrote this thing or not. Thank you all. CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS Dr. Steve C. Alderman assisted with data collection, with interpretation of the data and with the writing of Chapter 3. Dr. Sujaya Rao assisted with interpretation of the data and with design and writing of Chapter 2, Chapter 3 and Chapter 4. LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1. Year of survey and age of field since original planting for sites included in the study……………………………………………………………42 2.2. Incidence of E. typhina and presence of B. lobata in 10 orchardgrass fields surveyed in 2008 (a) and 4 sites surveyed in 2009 (b)………………………………………………………………………...43 2.3. Spatial distribution of E. typhina and B. lobata in orchardgrass fields sampled in 2008 and 2009………………………………...44 2.4. Simple linear regression results of the dependent variable, flies per stroma, against stroma density in 2008 (a) and 2009 (b). Analysis is presented for two scales of observation: at the quadrat scale and the host plant scale. Sites with β1 estimates having P < 0.05 are shown in bold.…………………………………………...……….45 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1. Abundance of B. lobata flies per infected plant in 2008 (a) and 2009 (c). Average number of flies per stroma per infected plant in 2008 (b) and 2009 (d). Frequency is equal to the total number of plants in each level on x-axis.…………………………………….……………46 2.2. νi plots depicting spatial aggregation in sites 1-4 in 2008 and 2009. Within each box, from left to right: spatial pattern of count data for infections per quadrat, stromata per quadrat and flies per quadrat are depicted. Dots represent quadrat locations. The νi values < -1.5 represent gaps (light grey); values between -1.5 and 1.5 represent random spatial arrangements (dark grey); values > 1.5 represent clusters (black). The black lines visible within each box represent field borders.…………………………………………………………47 2.3. Sites 5 through 10, surveyed in 2008, depicting νi plots of infections per quadrat, stromata per quadrat, and flies per quadrat. Dots represent actual quadrat locations. See Figure 2 (above) for an explanation of the legend. The black lines visible within each box represent field borders. …………………………………………………..48 2.4. The combined data from 2008 and 2009 for each site plotted against age of field, for: a) Proportion of plants infected in each quadrat; b) Mean stromata per host for each quadrat; and c) Mean flies per stroma for each quadrat. Open circles indicate sites from 2008, and filled circles indicate 2009. Standard error bars are depicted. …………………………………….………………………………….49 2.5. Quadrat Scale: Density of stromata per quadrat (x-axis) in relation to fly per stroma density for each quadrat (y-axis) for 2008 (a) and 2009 (b). Simple linear regression line is shown. See Table 4 2 for β1, r , and P-values.……………………..…………………………………..50 2.6. Plant Scale: Density of stromata per host (x-axis) in relation to fly per stroma density for each host (y-axis) for 2008 (a) and 2009 (b). 2 Simple linear regression line is shown. See Table 4 for β1, r , and P-values………………………………………………………………………...51 3.1. Burkard 7-day volumetric spore trap placed in an orchardgrass field used for capture of airborne ascospores.………………………………….65 LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure Page 3.2. Hourly counts of E. typhina
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oviposition Preference of Botanophila Flies (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) Towards Stroma Size of Epichloe¨ (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) Hosts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library BEHAVIOR Oviposition Preference of Botanophila Flies (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) Towards Stroma Size of Epichloe¨ (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) Hosts 1,2 3 4 1 K. GO´ RZYN´ SKA, Z. OLSZANOWSKI, A. LEUCHTMANN, AND M. LEMBICZ Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 107(2): 532Ð538 (2014); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/AN13094 ABSTRACT Stromata of grass-infecting fungi from the genus Epichloe¨ (Clavicipitaceae: Ascomy- cota) serve as a food source and egg-laying surface for ßies of genus Botanophila (Diptera: Antho- myiidae). Larger stromata should make it possible for ßies to lay more eggs and provide more food to offspring. This hypothesis was tested in four different grassÐfungus associations that occur in central Poland. In two of these associations, Epichloe¨ bromicola on Elymus repens and Epichloe¨ typhina on Puccinellia distans, ßies showed a preference for longer stromata, and egg density on these stromata was signiÞcantly higher than in the other two associations. A negative correlation between egg density and offspring success was observed in only one association, E. bromicola–El. repens. However, offspring success in this association did not differ signiÞcantly from offspring success in associations with lower egg density on the stromata, in which ßies showed no preference for the stroma length. Long-term observations (2000Ð2010) of ßyÐfungus interaction in the E. typhinaÐP. distans association showed that ßy preference toward stroma length may vary over time but with no clear tendency. No signiÞcant correlations were found between the larval density on a stroma and either larval weight or mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) of Finland 369 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.441.7527 CHECKLIST Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 369–382 (2014)Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland 369 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7527 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland Verner Michelsen1 1 Natural History Museum of Denmark (Zoological Museum), Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Corresponding author: Verner Michelsen ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 15 March 2014 | Accepted 8 May 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/4946FF28-E271-4E73-BFE5-12B71572C9F3 Citation: Michelsen V (2014) Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 369–382. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7527 Abstract An updated checklist of the the genera and species of Anthomyiidae (Diptera) found in Finland is provided. Keywords Checklist, Finland, Diptera, Anthomyiidae Introduction The family Anthomyiidae is a large and taxonomically difficult group of flies that has for the same reason suffered from unstable taxonomy and nomenclature. A checklist of the anthomyiid species known from pre-war Finland was compiled by their leading regional specialist of calyptrate flies Lauri Tiensuu (1906−1980) and published in Frey et al. (1941). The Anthomyiidae were then not recognized as a separate family but combined with the fanniid and true muscid flies in a comprehensive Muscidae fam- ily equivalent of the present Muscoidea less Scathophagidae. Tiensuu’s list included confirmed records of 199 anthomyiid species classified in 41 genera and subgenera. No less than 34% of the species names and 58% of the genus-group names in that list are Copyright Verner Michelsen.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthomyiidae Recording Scheme Newsletter No. 12
    Anthomyiidae Recording Scheme Newsletter No 12 Spring 2020 By the time you read this in print, the collecting season for Anthomyiidae could once again be well under way. The previous Newsletter a year ago (see Bulletin No 86) highlighted three genera, Egle, Chiastocheta and Leucophora which are particularly suitable for targeted recording in the spring, so please look back at that issue if you are not already familiar with them. If you have good relations with local bee recorders, you might encourage them to look out for and catch Leucophora females lurking near the burrows of solitary bees. Noting the bee species on any such records would give added value. This issue reviews the continuing growth of the Recording Scheme database as well as where to find data on Anthomyiidae from other sources. Another good genus for targeted recording later in the season is Chirosia with its twelve species currently recorded in Britain, all of whose larvae attack ferns. As with Pegomya leaf-miners discussed in Newsletter No 11, the feeding signs of some species are popular amongst recorders, but the association with particular species is not as clear-cut as previously suppose, as discussed in the final item. Current State of Recording Database The number of records credited to the Anthomyiidae Recording Scheme on the NBN Atlas was 17,374 in early December 2019. This is a 153% increase on the 6846 which were initially uploaded to IRECORD in autumn 2017. However, the number of Anthomyiidae records on the NBN Atlas amounted to 30,643, a factor 1.76 greater.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey and Ecology of Botanophila Fonsecai Ackland (Diptera, Anthomyiidae), a Seed-Fly Endemic to Scotland
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 618 Survey and ecology of Botanophila fonsecai Ackland (Diptera, Anthomyiidae), a seed-fly endemic to Scotland COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 618 Survey and ecology of Botanophila fonsecai Ackland (Diptera, Anthomyiidae), a seed-fly endemic to Scotland For further information on this report please contact: Dr Athayde Tonhasca SNH Battleby Perth PH1 3EW Telephone: 01738 458671 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Gibbs, D. 2013. Survey and ecology of Botanophila fonsecai Ackland (Diptera, Anthomyiidae), a seed-fly endemic to Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 618. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2013. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Survey and ecology of Botanophila fonsecai Ackland (Diptera, Anthomyiidae), a seed fly endemic to Scotland Commissioned Report No.: 618 Contractor: D. Gibbs Year of publication: 2013 Background The global distribution of the BAP-listed Fonseca's seed fly (Botanophila fonsecai) is believed to be restricted to a strip of sand and sparse herbage about 100-m long and a few metres wide on the north shore of the Dornoch Firth. As a putative endemic, B. fonsecai should be one of Scotland's biodiversity priorities, in accordance with the Rio Biodiversity Convention. Because of its limited distribution, B. fonsecai population is intrinsically small, therefore subject to random demographic fluctuations and environmental vicissitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthomyiidae Recording Scheme Newsletter No 11 Spring 2019
    Anthomyiidae Recording Scheme Newsletter No 11 Spring 2019 Introduction By the time you read this, the collecting season for Anthomyiidae could be well under way. This edition includes three items held over from the Autumn 2018 edition so that they have become more topical again. They concern genera which are particularly suited to a targeted search because of specific plant or host associations. Records and reports from later in 2018 are only just starting to trickle in, so the rest of the newsletter covers some identification issues that have arisen from the February 2018 workshop and from the verification backlog on IRECORD. An Egle bonanza There are currently 12 species of Egle on the British list. All except one of these are associated with willow (Salix sp.). They are medium to small dark Anthomyiids but the genus is reasonably easy to identify from the protruding edge of the mouth and long proboscis in most species, an adaptation to flower-feeding. The eggs are also laid on the female catkins where the larvae feed in the developing seed and eventually drop to the ground to pupate until the cycle recommences in the following spring. So these are a good subject for a targeted search early in the season when the adults can be swept from willows and can also be found basking in the sun on wooden structures. In a paper submitted for the next Dipterists Digest Nigel Jones says that for him “a good day Egle hunting heralds the beginning of a new season for Diptera and is something looked forward to with great anticipation”.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 84 Autumn 2017 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 84 Autumn 2017 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Rob Wolton Vice Chairman Howard Bentley Secretary Amanda Morgan Meetings Treasurer Phil Brighton Please use the Booking Form downloadable from our website Membership Sec. John Showers Field Meetings Field Meetings Sec. vacancy Now organised by several different contributors, contact the Secretary. Indoor Meetings Sec. Martin Drake Publicity Officer Erica McAlister Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Conservation Officer vacant Martin Drake [email protected] Ordinary Members Bulletin contributions Stuart Ball, Malcolm Smart, Peter Boardman, Victoria Burton, Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Tony Irwin, Martin Harvey, Chris Raper Dipterists Bulletin Editor Unelected Members Darwyn Sumner 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Tel. 0116 212 5075 [email protected] Secretary Assistant Editor Amanda Morgan Judy Webb Pennyfields, Rectory Road, Middleton, Saxmundham, Suffolk, IP17 3NW 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. [email protected] Tel. 01865 377487 [email protected] Treasurer Phil Brighton [email protected] Dipterists Digest contributions Deposits for DF organised field meetings to be sent to the Treasurer Dipterists Digest Editor Conservation Peter Chandler Robert Wolton (interim contact, whilst the post remains vacant) 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL Tel. 01225-708339 Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ [email protected] Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12. Biocontrol Arthropods: New Denizens of Canada's
    291 Chapter 12 Biocontrol Arthropods: New Denizens of Canada’s Grassland Agroecosystems Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate and Héctor Cárcamo Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre 5403 - 1 Avenue South, P.O. Box 3000 Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1 Abstract. Canada’s grassland ecosystems have undergone major changes since the arrival of European agriculture, ranging from near-complete replacement of native biodiversity with annual crops to the effects of overgrazing by cattle on remnant native grasslands. The majority of the “agroecosystems” that have replaced the historical native grasslands now encompass completely new associations of plants and arthropods in what is typically a mix of introduced and native species. Some of these species are pests of crops and pastures and were accidentally introduced. Other species are natural enemies of these pests and were deliberately introduced as classical biological control (biocontrol) agents to control these pests. To control weeds, 76 arthropod species have been released against 24 target species in Canada since 1951, all of which also have been released in western Canada. Of these released species, 53 (70%) have become established, with 18 estimated to be reducing target weed populations. The biocontrol programs for leafy spurge in the prairie provinces and knapweeds in British Columbia have been the largest, each responsible for the establishment of 10 new arthropod species on rangelands. This chapter summarizes the ecological highlights of these programs and those for miscellaneous weeds. Compared with weed biocontrol on rangelands, classical biocontrol of arthropod crop pests by using arthropods lags far behind, mostly because of a preference to manage crop pests with chemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera : Anthomyiidae)
    Title SOME ANTHOMYIID FLIES FROM MONEGROS, SPAIN (DIPTERA : ANTHOMYIIDAE) Author(s) Suwa, Masaaki; Blasco-Zumeta, Javier Insecta matsumurana. New series : journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, series entomology, 60, Citation 43-54 Issue Date 2003-12 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/9917 Type bulletin (article) File Information 60_p43-54.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INSECTA MATSUMURANA NEW SERIES 60: 43-54 DECEMBER 2003 SOME ANTHOMYIID FLIES FROM MONEGROS, SPAIN (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE) By MASAAKl SUWA and JAVIER BLASCO-ZUMETA Abstract SUWA, M. and BLASCO-ZUMETA, J. 2003. Some anthomyiid flies from Monegros, Spain (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Ins. matsum. n. s. 60: 43-54, 20 figs. Ninteen species ofAnthomyiidae are recorded from Monegros, Spain. One ofthem, Botanophila sp., seems to be an undescribed species closely related to B. turcica (Hennig), though it is not given a name as the single available secimen is severely damaged. Delia echinata (Seguy), a widely distributed species in the Holarctic region, is recorded as new to the mainland of Spain. Among the species dealt with here coprophagous or saprophagous species are comparatively rich. Authors' addresses. M. SUWA: Systematic Entomology, Graduate School ofAgriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589 Japan; J. BLASCO-ZUMETA: Hispanidad 8, 50750 Pina de Ebro, Zaragoza, Spain. 43 INTRODUCTION The Anthomyiidae are mostly known from temperate to subarctic ranges in the northern hemisphere. They have well been investigated in Europe, especially in central and northern parts, and about 460 species have been recorded from Europe as a whole. The Spanish fauna of Anthomyiidae has, however, rather poorly been investigated, about 60 or a little more species being known to occur in the mainland (Czerny & Strobl, 1909; Hennig, 1966- 1976; Ackland, 1977; Michelsen & Baez, 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • The Botanophila–Epichloë Association in Cultivated Festuca in Oregon: Evidence of Simple Fungivory S
    Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. The Botanophila–Epichloë association in cultivated Festuca in Oregon: evidence of simple fungivory S. Rao1,*, S.C. Alderman2, J. Takeyasu1 & B. Matson2 1Department of Crop & Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331, USA; 2USDA-ARS, National Forage Seed Production Research Center, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Accepted: 14 February 2005 Key words: Festuca rubra, fine fescue, exotic fungus, Epichloë festucae, fly–fungus interaction, choke disease, Oregon, Diptera, Anthomyiidae, Ascomycetes, Clavicipitaceae, Botanophila lobata Abstract We investigated the Botanophila (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)–Epichloë (Ascomycetes: Clavicipitaceae) interaction in cultivated Festuca spp. (fine fescue) in Oregon in western USA. Epichloë spp. are endo- phytic fungi of grasses in the subfamily Pooideae. They develop a felt-like stroma on the surface of grass culms and a dense mycelium within the culms that typically prevents seed head emergence. As a result, seed yields are suppressed, and hence the disease is known as choke. Studies of Epichloë spp. on wild grasses indicate that the fly–fungus interaction is an obligatory mutualism. During oviposi- tion, Botanophila transfers Epichloë spermatia between stromata of opposite mating types, and the perithecia that develop after fungal fertilization serve as food for Botanophila larvae. In the current study, we surveyed 19 cultivated fields of Festuca spp. in Oregon, and observed choke caused by Epichloë festucae Leuchtmann, Schardl and Siegl in 10 of these. However, perithecia were observed in only four fields, and on only 1.0–2.6% of stromata. Perithecial development was also low, and rarely covered 50% of the stroma surface. Despite the absence or low frequency of fertilized stromata, Botanophila lobata Collin larvae were present in all choke-infested fields.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence and Preference of Botanophila Flies (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) for Particular Species of Epichloë Fungi Infecting Wild Grasses
    Eur. J. Entomol. 110(1): 129–134, 2013 http://www.eje.cz/pdfs/110/1/129 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) The occurrence and preference of Botanophila flies (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) for particular species of Epichloë fungi infecting wild grasses MARLENA LEMBICZ1, KAROLINA GÓRZYŃSKA1, ZIEMOWIT OLSZANOWSKI2, VERNER MICHELSEN3 and ADRIAN LEUCHTMANN4 1 Department of Plant Taxonomy, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; e-mail: [email protected] 4 ETH Zürich, Plant Ecological Genetics, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Diptera, Anthomyiidae, Botanophila, egg morphology, fungi, Clavicipitaceae, Epichloë, molecular phylogeny, Poland Abstract. Specific associations between species frequently occur in ecological interactions. The aim of this study was to determine the preferences of anthomyiid flies of the genus Botanophila for particular species of fungi as sites for laying eggs and as food for both larvae and adults. The associations of their eggs, larvae and flies with the stromata of different species of Epichloë fungi infecting 7 species of grass in Poland were analyzed. Scanning electron microscopy of the surface of their eggs and an analysis of the genetic sequences of their mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (COII) were used to identify the taxa of the flies studied. Three types of eggs were distinguished based on their shape, colour and the presence of dorsal folds and sculpturing on the shells.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America
    US Department TECHNOLOGY of Agriculture TRANSFER FIELD GUIDE FOR THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WEEDS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA Rachel L. Winston, Carol B. Randall, Bernd Blossey, Philip W. Tipping, Ellen C. Lake, and Judy Hough-Goldstein Forest Health Technology FHTET-2016-04 Enterprise Team April 2017 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photos: Purple loosestrife (Jennifer Andreas, Washington State University Extension), Galerucella calmariensis (David Cappaert, Michigan State University, bugwood.org), tropical soda apple ((J. Jeffrey Mullahey, University of Florida, bugwood.org), Gratiana boliviana (Rodrigo Diaz, Louisiana State University), waterhyacinth (Chris Evans, University of Illinois, bugwood.org), Megamelus scutellaris (Jason D. Stanley, USDA ARS, bugwood.org), mile-a-minute weed (Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, bugwood.org), Rhinoncomimus latipes (Amy Diercks, bugwood.org) How to cite this publication: Winston, R.L., C.B. Randall, B. Blossey, P.W. Tipping, E.C. Lake, and J. Hough-Goldstein. 2017. Field Guide for the Biological Control of Weeds in Eastern North America. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia. FHTET-2016-04. In accordance with
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) Morphology, Taxonomy, Identification and Distribution
    ISSN 0044-5088 Zoologica Original Contributions to Zoology, founded in 1888 Ed. H.F. Paulus, Vienna Volume 162 " N" Manual of Central European Muscidae (Diptera) Morphology, taxonomy, identification and distribution sample pages E Schweizerbart Science Publishers eschweizerbart_xxx Zoologica Original Contributions to Zoology Founded 1888 by R. Leuckart, C. Chun, continued by W. Kükenthal, R. Hesse, W.E. Ankel Edited by Hannes F. Paulus Volume 162 František Gregor, Rudolf Rozkošný, Miroslav Barták and Jaromír Vaňhara Manual of Central European Muscidae (Diptera) Morphology, taxonomy, identification, and distribution with 54 plates sample pages Schweizerbart Science Publishers Stuttgart • 2016 eschweizerbart_xxx František Gregor, Rudolf Rozkošný, Miroslav Barták and Jaromír Vaňhara: Manual of Central European Muscidae (Diptera): Morphology, taxonomy, identification, and distribution Authors’ addresses: František Gregor, 638 00 Brno, Loosova 14, Czech Republic Rudolf Rozkošný and Jaromír Vaňhara, Masaryk University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany and Zoology 611 37 Brno, Kotlářská 2, Czech Republic, [email protected] , [email protected] Miroslav Barták, Czech University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, 165 21 Praha 6 – Suchdol, Czech Republic, [email protected] We would be pleased to receive your comments on the content of this book: [email protected] Front cover: Hydrotaea ignava, female, orig. F. Gregor Reviewed by: Dr. A.C. Pont, Oxford University, Great Britain ISBN 978-3-510-55049-4 ISSN 0044-5088 Information on this title: www.schweizerbart.com/9783510550494 © 2016 E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nägele u. Obermiller), Stuttgart, Germany All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of E.
    [Show full text]