DOCSLIB.ORG

SURFACE WATER SUPPLY of the UNITED STATES 1934

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SURFACE WATER SUPPLY of the UNITED STATES 1934 PLEASE DO NOT DESTROY OB THROW AWAT THIS PUBLICATION. If yon have no further use for it, write to the Geological Surrey at Washington and ask for a frank to return it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SURFACE WATER SUPPLY of the UNITED STATES 1934 PART 7 LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN Prepared in cooperation with the States of COLORADO. KANSAS, MISSOURI, NEW MEXICO, TENNESSEE, and TEXAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 762 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAROLD L. ICKES, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. MENDENHALL, Director Water-Supply Paper 762 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY of the UNITED STATES 1934 PART? LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer D. H. BARBER, H. C. BECKMAN, C. E. ELLSWORTH, ROBERT POLLANSBEE J. H. GARDINER, BERKELEY JOHNSON, W. R. KING C. E. McCASHIN, and J. B. SPIEGEL District Engineers Prepared in cooperation with the States of COLORADO, KANSAS, MISSOURI, NEW MEXICO TENNESSEE, and TEXAS Jjbrary Copy UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1936 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - Price 20 cents (Paper cover) CONTENTS Page Authorization and scope of work.___________________________________ 1 Definition of terms._______________________________________________ 2 Explanation of data.______________________________________________ 2 Accuracy of field data and computed results..________________________ 5 Publications ______________________________________________________ 6 Cooperation._ ____________________________________________________ 10 Division of work._________________________________________________ 10 Gaging-station records.____________________________________________ 11 Mississippi River______________________________________________ 11 Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo._________________________ 11 Mississippi River at Cape Girardeau, Mo_-____________--_.__ 13 Mississippi River at Memphis, Tenn__________________-___-_. 15 Mississippi River near Vicksburg, Miss______________________ 17 Meramec River Basin_________________________________________ 19 Meramec River near Steelville, Mo-___-_--___________----___ 19 Meramec River near Eureka, Mo_ __________________________ 20 Bourbeuse River at Union, Mo_____________________________ 21 Big River at Byrnesville, Mo_______________________________ 22 Headwater Diversion Channel Basin____________-__________._____ 23 Castor River at Zalma, Mo_____-___-_-__.________--_____ 23 Obion River Basin__________._________________________________ 24 South Fork of Obion River near Greenfield, Tenn_____________ 24 Obion River at Obion, Tenn________________________________ 25 Rutherford Fork of Obion River near Bradford, Tenn_________ 26 North Fork of Obion River near Union City, Tenn____________ 27 South Fork of Forked Deer River at Jackson, Tenn___________ 29 South Fork of Forked Deer River at Chestnut Bluff, Tenn_____ 30 Middle Fork of Forked Deer River near Alamo, Tenn_________ 31 Hatchie River Basin.__________________________________________ 32 Hatchie River at Bolivar, Tenn_____________________________ 32 Hatchie River near Stanton, Tenn._________________________ 33 Wolf River Basin-_--_________-_______---_______________._____ 34 Wolf River at Rossville, Tenn_______._________________.____ 34 St. Francis River Basin________________________________________ 35 St. Francis River near Patterson, Mo______________________ 35 St. Francis River at Fisk, Mo_______---_-_--____-___-_-____ 36 Little River Ditch 81 near Kennett, Mo_____________________ 37 Little River Ditch 1 near Kennett, Mo______________________ 38 Little River Ditch 66 near Kennett, Mo_____________________ 39 Little River Ditch 66-A near Kennett, Mo__________________- 40 Little River Ditch 251 near Kennett, Mo____________________ 41 Little River Ditch 259 near Kennett, Mo____________________ 42 Big Lake outlet near Manila, Ark.__________________________ 43 m IV CONTENTS Gaging-station records Continued. Page White River Basin_________..______-____________-_-_____-______ 44 White River at Beaver, Ark__-_____________________________ 44 White River at Forsyth, Mo--____-___________--____-______- 45 White River near Flippin, Ark____________________________ 46 White River at De Vails Bluff, Ark.__.________________ 47 James River at Galena, Mo________________________________ 48 Wilson Creek near Springfield, Mo___----_------__---___-___ 49 Buffalo River near Rush, Ark_______________________________ 50 North Fork of White River at Tecumseh, Mo._______________ 51 North Fork of White River near Henderson, Ark____________ 52 Black River at Leeper, Mo--_---___-------------------_--_- 53 Current River near Eminence, Mo_-__---------------------- 54 Current River at Van Buren, Mo___------------__------_-__ 55 Current River at Doniphan, Mo__-_----_-_-_---____..--_-_-_ 56 Round Spring at Round Spring, Mo____-___-_--__--_---__-._ 57 Jacks Fork at Eminence, Mo_______________________________ 58 Alley Spring at Alley, Mo____---------------------------.-- 59 Big Spring near Van Buren, Mo___ _________________________ 60 Eleven Point River near Bardley, Mo________--__-___-___--_ 61 Greer Spring at Greer, Mo___.._--__--------------_.-------- 62 Little Red River near Heber Springs, Ark____________________ 63 Arkansas River Basin.________________.__-____---__-----_-_-__ 64 Arkansas River at Granite, Colo_______-___--____--__-_-____ 64 Arkansas River at Salida, Colo____-------------_----------- 65 Arkansas River at Canon City, Colo_---_-----------------__- 66 Arkansas River near Pueblo, Colo_------------------------__ 67 Arkansas River near Nepesta, Colo___----------------------- 68 Arkansas River at La Junta, Colo_________________________ 69 Arkansas River at Lamar, Colo___-____-___--__-_--__-___-__ 70 Arkansas River at Holly, Colo__-__----__--_-_-----------___ 71 Arkansas River at Syracuse, Kans_________________________ 72 Arkansas River at Garden City. Kans_______________________ 73 Arkansas River at Larned, Kans_______-_________.__-__--__-_ 74 Arkansas River near Wichita, Kans___ _____________________ 75 Arkansas River at Arkansas City, Kans______-____--_-__-__ 76 Arkansas River at Webbers Falls, Okla______________________ 77 Arkansas River at Van Buren, Ark___--_______-____----_---- 78 Arkansas River at Little Rock, Ark___________-_____-_-___-_ 79 South Arkansas River near Salida, Colo_-__------------------ 80 Grape Creek near Westcliffe, Colo___-----------_-_---------- 81 St. Charles River at Burnt Mill, Colo_________-__-__-_--_- 82 Huerfano River at Manzanares Crossing, near Red Wing, Colo_ 83 Cucharas River near La Veta, Colo_________ .______--____-- 84 Purgatoire River at Trinidad, Colo____________-___-_----__-- 85 Purgatoire River at Ninemile Dam, near Higbee, Colo_-_______ 86 Purgatoire River at Highland Dam, near Las Animas, Colo____ 87 Wild Horse Creek at Holly, Colo_____________ .________.. 88 Holly Drain near Holly, Colo ___________________________ 89 Amazon Canal near Hartland, Kans____-______-____----_---- 90 South Side Ditch near Hartland, Kans__-__-__-__-__--_____ 91 Great Eastern Canal at Lakin, Kans_______________________ 92 Farmers Ditch near Garden City, Kans._____________________ 93 CONTENTS V Gaging-station records Continued. Arkansas River Basin Continued. Page Garden City Canal near Garden City, Kans._________________ 94 Pawnee River near Lamed, Kans____--_-------_------_----_ 95 Little Arkansas River at Valley Center, Kans _____________ 96 Walnut River at Winfield, Kans__________-_____.___ 97 Cimarron River at Oilton, Okla._______------_---______-_--_ 98 Verdigris River at Independence, Kans.______________________ 99 Neosho River near lola, Kans__________--_-______-_________ 100 Neosho River near Parsons, Kans_____-______--_-___________ 101 Cotton wood River at Cotton wood Falls, Kans_ _______________ 102 Spring River near Waco, Mo_____________--__---______-____ 103 Turkey Creek at Joplin, Mo______________________________ 104 Shoal Creek near Joplin, Mo.______________________________ 105 Canadian River at Logan, N. Mex__________________________ 106 Cieneguilla Creek near Therma, N. Mex_____--_____________- 107 Cimarron River at Ute Park, N. Mex_-_--_-_----____-_-_--_ 108 Sixmile Creek near Therma, N. Mex________________________ 109 Moreno Creek at Therma, N. Mex____--_-_---_---_________ 110 Colmor Intake Canal near Ocate, N. Mex____________________ 111 Mora River at La Cueva, N. Mex______-__--__--__________- 112 Mora River near Golondrinas, N. Mex_-_-_-_-_-_____-_____- 113 Mora River near Shoemaker, N. Mex_______-_,_____________ 114 Coyote Creek near Golondrinas, N. Mex-__--_-_-___________- 115 Lee Creek near Van Buren, Ark__________________._________ 116 Red River Basin._____________________________________________ 117 Red River near Denison, Tex_____________________________ 117 Red River at Garland City, Ark____________________________ 118 Pease River near Crowell, Tex____________-___-_____________ 119 Little Wichita River near Archer City, Tex __________________ 119 Washita River near Durwood, Okla_________________________ 120 little River near Horatio, Ark____________________________ 121 Sulphur River near Darden, Tex____________________________ 122 Cypress Creek near Jefferson, Tex______--_-_----___________ 123 Ouachita River at Rennel Dam, near Malvern, Ark___________ 124 Miscellaneous discharge measurements-.---.------------------------- 125 Index.. _____________________-._______________________ 127 ILLUSTRATION Page FIGURE 1. Typical river-measurement station snowing concrete well and house for water-stage recorder
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NPS Form 10 900-B
    NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) Section number Appendices Page 159 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION Figure 1. William Buckles, “Map showing official SFT Routes…,” Journal of the West (April 1989): 80. Note: The locations of Bent’s Old Fort and New Fort Lyon are reversed; New Fort Lyon was west of Bent’s Old Fort. NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) Section number Appendices Page 160 Figure 2. Susan Calafate Boyle, “Comerciantes, Arrieros, Y Peones: The Hispanos and the Santa Fe Trade,” Southwest Cultural Resources Center: Professional Papers No. 54: Division of History Southwest Region, National Park Service, 1994 [electronic copy on-line]; available from National Park Service, <http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/safe/shs3.htm> (accessed 11 August 2011). NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) Section number Appendices Page 161 Figure 3. “The Southwest 1820-1835,” National Geographic Magazine, Supplement of the National Geographic November 1982, 630A. NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised)
    NPS Form 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NPS Approved – April 3, 2013 National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items New Submission X Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) I. The Santa Fe Trail II. Individual States and the Santa Fe Trail A. International Trade on the Mexican Road, 1821-1846 A. The Santa Fe Trail in Missouri B. The Mexican-American War and the Santa Fe Trail, 1846-1848 B. The Santa Fe Trail in Kansas C. Expanding National Trade on the Santa Fe Trail, 1848-1861 C. The Santa Fe Trail in Oklahoma D. The Effects of the Civil War on the Santa Fe Trail, 1861-1865 D. The Santa Fe Trail in Colorado E. The Santa Fe Trail and the Railroad, 1865-1880 E. The Santa Fe Trail in New Mexico F. Commemoration and Reuse of the Santa Fe Trail, 1880-1987 C. Form Prepared by name/title KSHS Staff, amended submission; URBANA Group, original submission organization Kansas State Historical Society date Spring 2012 street & number 6425 SW 6th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Arkansas Regional Planning Area State of the Resource & Regional Goal Action Plan Implementation Report
    State of the Resource & Regional Goal Action Plan Implementation Report August 2018 Upper Arkansas Regional Planning Area Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................2 WATER USE TRENDS ...........................................................................................................................3 WATER RESOURCE CONDITIONS .........................................................................................................5 GROUNDWATER ................................................................................................................................................ 5 SURFACE WATER ............................................................................................................................................... 9 WATER QUALITY .............................................................................................................................. 10 GROUNDWATER .............................................................................................................................................. 10 SURFACE WATER ............................................................................................................................................. 14 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS .......................................................................................................... 15 SUSTAINABILITY ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and References
    Notes and References 1. Kate L. Gregg, The Road to Santa Fe – The Journal and Diaries of George Champlin Sibley, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, Second Paperback Edition 1952 with Preface 1995, pp 6-7. 2. K. Gregg, p 54. 3. K. Gregg, pp 197-198, 203. 4. K. Gregg, p 78. 5. K. Gregg, p 199. 6. K. Gregg, pp 84-85, 118, 202. 7. K. Gregg, pp 105-106. 8. Sibley’s Journal says Oct 30 (K. Gregg, p 111), but the Official Report says Oct 31(K. Gregg, p2 00). 9. K. Gregg, pp 116, 131. 10. K. Gregg, p 155. 11. K. Gregg, p 201. 12. K. Gregg, p 203. 13. K. Gregg, p 44. 14. A good example of this is in the vicinity of present-day Larned, Kansas. Going west in 1825, Sibley’s diary clearly describes camping at and crossing the Pawnee Fork a mile above its mouth (K. Gregg, p 73), approximately where present-day Hwy 56 crosses the Pawnee River just southwest of downtown Larned. The location of that camp is confirmed by the map Brown prepared in Taos in November 1825, which Sibley then sent to Benjamin Reeves November 13, 1825 (K. Gregg, p 115; The State Historical Society of Missouri, Abiel Leonard Papers, Collection No. 1013, Folder 34). On the return trip east in 1826, the route was apparently “corrected” because the map in the Field Book clearly coincides with crossing the Pawnee Fork at present-day Larned State Hospital. 15. K. Gregg, pp 176, 203. 16. K.
    [Show full text]
  • Wagon Tracks. Volume 13, Issue 3 (May, 1999) Santa Fe Trail Association
    Wagon Tracks Volume 13 Article 1 Issue 3 Wagon Tracks Volume 13, Issue 3 (May 1999) 1999 Wagon Tracks. Volume 13, Issue 3 (May, 1999) Santa Fe Trail Association Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/wagon_tracks Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Santa Fe Trail Association. "Wagon Tracks. Volume 13, Issue 3 (May, 1999)." Wagon Tracks 13, 3 (1999). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/wagon_tracks/vol13/iss3/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wagon Tracks by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Wagon Tracks. Volume 13, Issue 3 (May, 1999) SANTA FE TRAIL ASSOCIATION QUARTERLY VOLUME 13 MAY 1999 NUMBER 3 DIARY OF WILLIAM !• •• ANDERSON THORNTON: ~ i MILITARY SERVICE ON THE 'ct '. TRAIL AND IN NEW MEX­ SYMPOSIUM PROGRAM ICO, 1855-1856, PART I by Jan White Transcribed by Steppen Clyde Blair (Jan White, Council Graue, member and Bonita M. Oliva of SFTA and Heart of the Flint Hills Chapter, is in charge ofpublicity for WILLIAM A. Thornton was born in the 1999 symposium.) Albany, NY, in 1802. He graduated from the U. S. Military Academy at ONCE againAmerican Indians and West Point, NY, in 1825, and was ap­ Santa Fe Trail travelers will meet in pointed second lieutenant in the 'The Grove" during the SFTA Sym­ SFTA ELECTION BALLOTS . Fourth Artillery. Following artillery posium at Council Grove: "Treaties, DUE JULY 15 training at Fort Monroe, VA, he Trails, and Traders," September 23­ helped survey the Dismal Swamp 26, 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • County Commission
    COUNTY COMMISSION Tuesday, September 4, 2012 6:45 PM Ellis County Courthouse Order of Business I. Opening A. Call to Order B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Clerk Calls the Roll D. Approval of Agenda II. Approval of Prior Minutes III. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Employee Status Changes as presented B. Approval of Refunding Warrants as presented C. Approval of Tax Roll Adjustments as presented D. Approval of Escape Tax Orders as presented E. Approval of Accounts Payable and Payroll as presented IV. Regular Agenda A. 2012 Budget Amendment Hearing Enclosure 1. 2012 Budget Amendment Consideration of Approval 2. Transfers in Budget Amendment Consideration of Transfers B. Care Council Funding Recommendations Enclosure Consideration of Recommendations C. Public Works Enclosure 1. Pneumatic Roller Consideration of Purchase Proposal 2. BG Consultants – Engineering Agreement Enclosure Consideration of contracting with BG Consultants 3. Road Safety Project 26C-0370-01 – Construction Engineer Selection Enclosure Consideration of Statements of Qualification 4. Pubic Works CIP for 2012 Enclosure Discussion of Identified Needs 5. Dakota Wells Idea Report 6. Road Improvement Bond Issue Consideration of advertising for a bond consultant D. Sheriff 1. Springhill Radio Tower Lease – Amateur Radio Equipment Enclosure Consideration of Lease E. Emergency Medical Services 1. Letter of Compliance Enclosure Discussion F. County Administrator th 1. 55 Street Radio Tower Project Enclosure Follow-up Report 2. Adjusters International Enclosure Consideration of Proposal G. Commissioner Reports V. Adjournment Ellis County, Kansas Meeting Memo To: County Commission From: Greg Sund CC: Order of Business Recipients Date: 8/31/2012 Re: September 4, 2012 Order of Business V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Groundwater Management Program
    The Groundwater Management Program Southwest Kansas Groundwater Management District Number 3 (GMD3) 2009 E. Spruce Street, Garden City, Kansas 67846 (620) 275-7147 URL: HTTP://www.gmd3.org All policy and opinion expressed herein are intended only as that of GMD3 Proposed Revised (Draft), 10/20/18 2018 Board of Directors: Kirk Heger, President - Stevens County Bret Rooney, Vice President - Haskell County Mike McNiece, Secretary - Industrial at large Mike O’Brate, Treasurer - Gray County Fred Claassen, Director - Morton County Kent Dunn, Director – Seward County Doug Fox, Director - Meade County Zachary Gale, Director - Hamilton County Randy Hayzlett, Director - Surface Water at large Fred Jones, Director - Municipal at large Seth Nelson, Director - Stanton County Dave Casterline, Director - Ford County Hal Scheuerman, Director - Kearny County Clay Scott, Director - Grant County Steve Stone, Director - Finney County Southwest Kansas Working Aquifers – Conserving Every Day in Every Way Draft with edits by GMD3 staff 10/20/18 1 Table of Contents I. PURPOSE FOR LOCAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT .......................................... 3 II. GMD3 MISSION, OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES ............................................................... 5 III. ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY OF THE DISTRICT ......................................................... 9 IV. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DISTRICT ......................................................................... 12 General Characteristics .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Condition Assessment for the Pawnee River Fort Larned National Historic Site, Kansas
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Riparian Condition Assessment for the Pawnee River Fort Larned National Historic Site, Kansas Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/WRD/NRR—2015/912 ON THE COVER Army bridge built in 1868 across the Pawnee River at Fort Larned Source: Fort Larned National Historic Site archives Riparian Condition Assessment for the Pawnee River Fort Larned National Historic Site, Kansas Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/WRD/NRR—2015/912 Michael Martin National Park Service Water Resources Division 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Joel Wagner National Park Service Water Resources Division P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 February 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Larned National Historic Site Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Southern Plains Network Johnson City, TX Fort Larned National Historic Site Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Natural Resource Report___________________________ ON THE COVER Aerial views of Fort Larned and the Santa Fe Trail Ruts Site. Photographs by: NPS Fort Larned National Historic Site Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Natural Resource Report _______________________________ Authors Dan Cogan Cogan Technology Inc. 21 Valley Road Galena, IL 61036 David Salas U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Group Mail Stop 86-68260 P.O. Box 25007 Denver Federal Center Bldg. 56 Denver, Colorado 80225 Lisa M. Castle Walker, Hillary Loring and Jennifer Delisle Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory Kansas Biological Survey 2102 Constant Ave. Lawrence, KS 66047 January 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Southern Plains Network Johnson City, TX i The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Mandel.Pdf
    Geomorphology 101 (2008) 342–361 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Buried paleoindian-age landscapes in stream valleys of the central plains, USA ☆ Rolfe D. Mandel Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: A systematic study of late-Quaternary landscape evolution in the Central Plains documented widespread, Received 23 October 2007 deeply buried paleosols that represent Paleoindian-age landscapes in terrace fills of large streams (N5th Received in revised form 12 March 2008 order), in alluvial fans, and in draws in areas of western Kansas with a thick loess mantle. Alluvial Accepted 12 March 2008 stratigraphic sections were investigated along a steep bio-climatic gradient extending from the moist- Available online 29 May 2008 subhumid forest-prairie border of the east-central Plains to the dry-subhumid and semi-arid shortgrass prairie of the west-central Plains. Radiocarbon ages indicate that most large streams were characterized by Keywords: slow aggradation accompanied by cumulic soil development from ca. 11,500 to 10,000 14C yr B.P. In the Paleosols Alluvium valleys of some large streams, such as the Ninnescah and Saline rivers, these processes continued into the Terraces early Holocene. The soil-stratigraphic record in the draws of western Kansas indicates slow aggradation Alluvial fans punctuated by episodes of landscape stability and pedogenesis beginning as early as ca. 13,300 14C yr B.P. and Paleoindian spanning the Pleistocene–Holocene boundary. The development record of alluvial fans in western Kansas is Central Great Plains similar to the record in the draws; slow aggradation was punctuated by multiple episodes of soil development between ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 36, Number 1, 2014
    Kansas Preservation Volume 36, Number 1 • 2014 REAL PLACES. REAL STORIES. Living Underground in Kansas See story on page 13 Historical Society Renyer Appointed to National Advisory Board Newsletter of the Cultural Resources Division Todd Renyer, project manager and historic preservation architect at Treanor Kansas Historical Society Architects, was appointed to the U.S. Senate Curatorial Advisory Board in Volume 36 Number 1 February 2014. Renyer was nominated by Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, one of Contents five members on the U.S. Senate Commission on Art. 1 The curatorial advisory board is composed of historians, curators, architects, Dalton Gang Hideout preservationists, and experts from institutions across the nation. The board is 3 responsible for advising and assisting the Senate Commission on Art with National and State Register Nominations acquiring, preserving, restoring, and replacing historical documents, artifacts, 8 and works of art relating to the Senate wing of the Capitol and the Senate Keeping the History in Historic Rehabilitation Projects office buildings. Renyer worked on the multi-year restoration of the Kansas State Capitol. 11 Kaw Mission: Historic American Building Survey He was responsible for the phased design and restoration of the Capitol’s 13 north and south wings. “I am excited to work with some of the nation’s Living Underground in Kansas leading experts in curation, history, arts and architecture to assist the U.S. Senate Commission on Art,” Renyer said. A registered architect in Kansas, Renyer currently serves as the president KANSAS PRESERVATION of the Kansas Preservation Alliance, the only state-wide non-profit historic preservation organization in the state of Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Archeology at the Village on Pawnee Fork, Ness County, Kansas
    TR 86 Historical Archeology at the Village on Pawnee Fork, Jones Historical Archeology at the Village on Pawnee Fork, Ness County, Kansas 2002 Kansas County, Ness Fork, Pawnee on Village the at Archeology Historical Jones Ness County, Kansas National Park Service - Midwest Archeological Center Historical Archeology at the Village on Pawnee Fork, Ness County, Kansas By Bruce A. Jones Midwest Archeological Center Technical Report No. 86 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska 2002 This report has been reviewed against the cr iteria contained in 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1) and, upon recommenda tion of the Midwest Regional Office and the Midwest Archeological Center, has been classified as Available Making the report available meets the criteria of 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1). Abstract Extensive inventory and excavation by avocational archeologist Earl Monger and two episodes of evaluative testing by Kansas State Historical Society archeologists in 1976 and 1977 have confirmed the location of the Cheyenne-Oglala village that was destroyed by the order of Major General Winfield S. Hancock in April 1867. Monger’s work and the Society investigations exposed several concentrations of burned and broken historic Euroamerican materials, together with some other artifacts that are clearly of American Indian manufacture. The artifact concentrations correlate with the piles of Indian belongings that Hancock’s troops collected and burned following the villagers’ flight from the military expedition. The archeological context of the artifactual materials matches well with the various historical descriptions of the village and its destruction.
    [Show full text]