Clindamycin with Primaquine Vs. Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole
524 Clindamycin with Primaquine vs. Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Therapy for Mild and Moderately Severe Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Patients with AIDS: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial (CTN 004) Emil Toma, Anona Thorne, Joel Singer, Janet Raboud, From the Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Centre Claude Lemieux, Sylvie Trottier, Michel G. Bergeron, Hospitalier de l'Universite de MontreÂal, the Immunode®ciency Chris Tsoukas, Julian Falutz, Richard Lalonde, Treatment Centre (IDTC), Montreal General Hospital, and the Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, and Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite du Christiane Gaudreau, Rachel Therrien, and the QueÂbec, Quebec, Quebec; and the Canadian HIV Trials Network, CTN-PCP Study Group* Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada This double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial compared clindamycin/primaquine (Cm/Prq) Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/27/3/524/280761 by guest on 25 September 2021 with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) as therapy for AIDS-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP). Forty-®ve patients received clindamycin (450 mg four times daily [q.i.d.]) and primaquine (15 mg of base/d); 42 received TMP-SMZ (320 mg/1,600 mg q.i.d. if weight of §60 kg or 240 mg/1,200 mg q.i.d. if weight of õ60 kg) plus placebo primaquine. Overall, the ef®cacy of Cm/Prq was similar to that of TMP-SMZ (success rate, 76% vs. 79%, respectively); Cm/Prq was associated with fewer adverse events (P Å .04), less steroid use (P Å .18), and more rashes (P Å .07). These differences were even greater for patients with PaO2 of ú70 mm Hg (P Å .02, P Å .04, and P Å .02, respectively).
[Show full text]