DOCSLIB.ORG

|||GET||| the Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory Why Did Foragers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
|||GET||| the Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory Why Did Foragers THE AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION IN PREHISTORY WHY DID FORAGERS BECOME FARMERS? 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Graeme Barker | 9780199559954 | | | | | The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why Did Foragers Become Farmers? These societies radically modified their natural environment by means of specialized food-crop cultivation, with activities such as irrigation and deforestation which allowed the production of surplus food. Besides being a direct source of food, certain animals could provide leather, wool, hides, and fertilizer. Be the first to ask a question about The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory. Anderson-Gerfaud ed. The reason I gave the book four and not five stars is because throughout the book, the author throws out a bunch of facts and data. Virology Journal. There are several competing but not mutually exclusive theories as to the factors that drove populations to take up agriculture. It was this massive emigration from the Middle East that later helped distribute these animals to the rest of Afroeurasia. Both of these regions were heavily populated and had regular trade contacts with each other, as well as with early Austroasiatic speakers to the west, and early Kra-Dai speakers to the south, facilitating the spread of rice cultivation throughout southern China. The Holocene. Original Title. The most famous crop domesticated in the Ethiopian highlands is coffee. The Idea of The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory Why did Foragers become Farmers? 1st edition Richard Bradley. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. Ecological Studies. Andrew Sherratt has argued that following upon the Neolithic Revolution was a second phase of discovery that he refers to as the secondary products revolution. Hassuna Late Gawra Some of the earliest domesticated animals included dogs East Asiaabout 15, years ago[81] sheep, goats, cows, and pigs. One of the world's most important crops, barleywas domesticated in the Near East around 11, years ago c. To see what your friends thought of this book, The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory Why did Foragers become Farmers? 1st edition sign up. Sandie rated it it was amazing Jul 15, It also made possible nomadic pastoralism in semi arid areas, along the margins of deserts, and eventually led to the domestication of both the dromedary and Bactrian camel. Play media. Douglas Main article: Barley. Against current orthodoxy, Barker develops a strong case for the development of agricultural systems in many areas as transformations in the life-ways of the indigenous forager societies, and argues that these were as much changes in social norms and ideologies as in ways of obtaining food. South Asia. Bellwood proposes that this may have been the impetus of the Austronesian expansion which started with the migration of the Austronesian- speakers from Taiwan to the Philippines at around 5, BP. There are two main drivers, he suggests, to the emergence of agriculture, a combination of climate change and social evolution. The Middle East served as the source for many animals that could be domesticated, such as sheep, goats and pigs. History of technology. They were cultivated around BCE. Chapter I. This seems to confirm the theories of Carl Sauer who, in "Agricultural Origins and Dispersals", suggested as early as that this region was a centre of early agriculture. Ubaid 3. The Birth of the Gods and the Origins of Agriculture, p. During this period, there is evidence of large settlements and intensive rice cultivation in Taiwan and the Penghu Islandswhich may have resulted in overexploitation. In Hall, A. He then goes on to a world wide survey, starting in South West Asia where farming first began. The Borderlands of Science. One World Archaeology. Modernity Futurology. Peter Bellwood tackles the same subject from a slightly different perspective. No trivia or quizzes yet. Agribusiness Agricultural cooperative Agricultural supplies Agricultural science Agricultural engineering Agroforestry Agronomy Animal husbandry Animal-free agriculture Contract farming Extensive farming Farm Feed The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory Why did Foragers become Farmers? 1st edition Free range Intensive farming animals pigs crops Mechanised agriculture Organic farming Permaculture Sustainable agriculture Universities and colleges Urban agriculture. Further information: History of agriculture. So with more food, the population expanded and communities developed specialized workers and more advanced tools. Neolithic Revolution Some of the plants tried and then abandoned during the Neolithic period The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory Why did Foragers become Farmers? 1st edition the Ancient Near East, at sites like Gilgal, were later successfully The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory Why did Foragers become Farmers? 1st edition in other parts of the world. Pottery Neolithic Sang-i Chakmak. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Binford ed. The Borderlands of Science. Susiana A. Living in one spot permitted the accrual of personal possessions and an attachment to certain areas of land. Asian yams and taro were also cultivated in Africa. Currently you have JavaScript disabled. The artisans, in turn, were able to develop technology such as metal weapons. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. New York: W. Gian Hasan Mersin 19— Friend Reviews. This was at the altitudinal limits of these crops, and it has been suggested that cultivation in more favourable ranges in the lowlands may have been even earlier. In their approximately 10, years of shared proximity with animals, such as cows, Eurasians and Africans became more resistant to those diseases compared with the indigenous populations encountered outside Eurasia and Africa. Yarim Tepe Hajji Firuz Tepe. Once trade and a secure food supply were established, populations could grow, and society could diversify into food producers and artisans, who could afford to develop their trade by virtue of the free time they enjoyed because of a surplus of food. The spread of the Neolithic from the Near East Neolithic to Europe was first studied quantitatively in the s, when a sufficient number of Carbon 14 age determinations for early Neolithic sites had become available. Chogha Bonut. Hormones Athens. Besides being a direct source of food, certain animals could provide leather, wool, hides, and fertilizer. Showing Discover Magazine : 64— Ron Jambo rated it really liked it Sep 16, Fertilizers and irrigation may have increased crop yields but also would have promoted proliferation of insects and bacteria in the local environment while grain storage attracted additional insects and rodents. There is strong evidence for causal connections between the Near-Eastern Neolithic and that further east, up to the Indus Valley. BBC News. It is characterized by typical pre-Austronesian features, including stilt houses, jade carving, and boat technologies. Tor Jensen marked it as to-read Mar 31, One likely explanation for this apparent human progress in subsistance techniques together with a long period of demographic stagnation is that epidemologically this was perhaps the most lethal period in human history". Evidence of drainage ditches at Kuk Swamp on the borders of the Western and Southern Highlands of Papua New Guinea shows evidence of the cultivation of taro and a variety of other crops, dating back to 11, BP. Get A Copy. Lists with This Book. The kola nut was first domesticated in West Africa. One of the world's most important crops, barleywas domesticated in the Near East around 11, years ago c. International Commission on Stratigraphy. Do be advised that shipments may be delayed due to extra safety precautions implemented at our centers and delays with local shipping carriers. Archived from the original on June 18, Sherratt argued that this phase in The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory Why did Foragers become Farmers? 1st edition development enabled humans to make use of the energy possibilities of their animals in new ways, and permitted permanent intensive subsistence farming and crop production, and the opening up of heavier soils for farming. Big History. These societies radically modified their natural environment by means of specialized food-crop cultivation, with activities such as irrigation and deforestation which allowed the production of surplus food. The second is in the middle Yangtze River, believed to be the homelands of the early Hmong-Mien -speakers and associated with the Pengtoushan and Daxi cultures. Spike Petersonpoints out that agriculture brought about deep social divisions and encouraged gender inequality. The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory: Why did Foragers become Farmers? Further information: Domestication of animals. This article is about the introduction of agriculture during the Stone Age. Rich marked it as to-read Dec 15, Understanding the reasons why foragers and hunters transitioned to agriculture provides valuable insights to our day to day lives and our future. Network Analysis in Archaeology Carl Knappett. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. Gordon Childe in his book Man Makes Himself. On the African continent, three areas have been identified as independently developing agriculture: the Ethiopian highlandsthe Sahel and West Africa. October Oxford University Press. A full five thousand years later it has risen only to 5 million Thus inhe was appointed to a lectureship in New Zealand and in he moved to the Australian National University, so here we see the first farmers from an Antipodean
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Architecture
    Architecture Gernot Wilhelm I Carlo Zaccagnini (Plates 111 - XVt, LXXXVI, 5 - XCIV) wall built of 4-5 layers of 6 mudbricks each (format: 20(?) x 14 x 11cm), laid on their long side, delimited the grave to­ LEVEL4 wards the south. Since the burial was mostly hidden under the balk between squares R 18 and S 18, the relevant part of the balk was carefully removed in order to clarify the (Plates VI, IX-XI, XII, LXXXVI, 5- LXXXVII) stratigraphical attribution of the tomb. As a result it became clear that the ash layer AF 99 (-352), which marks the transi­ The oldest artifacts found at Tell Karrana 3 are six Halaf tion from Level 4 to Level 3c, was not cut by a grave pit. A sherds (see Plate XXV, 183-186) which, however, come from pavement of flat stones (AF 123, upper Iimit: -340 to -345) much younger Ievels (see E. Rova in this volume, p. 51). The had been laid on this ash layer. On top of the pavement, the earliest traces of human presence emerged in the southeastem wall AF 2512 of Level 3c and a connected wall (AF 122), (squares S 17118) and R 18119) andin the westem (square Q running towards the east, had been erected. A floor (AF 130), 17) part of the mound. In squares SIR 17 a compact whitish which corresponds to the floor of Level 4, AF 62 = 107, was clay floor (AF 62 = 107, altitude: -382 to -388) was super­ found cut by the grave pit of Burial 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia: an Environmental
    Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia Professor V. M. Masson introducing school children from Ashgabat to the excavations at the Neolithic site of Jeitun, Turkmenistan, April 1990. David R. Harris Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia An Environmental-Archaeological Study with contributions from: Eleni Asouti, Amy Bogaard, Michael Charles, James Conolly, Jennifer Coolidge, Keith Dobney, Chris Gosden, Jen Heathcote, Deborah Jaques, Mary Larkum, Susan Limbrey, John Meadows, Nathan Schlanger, and Keith Wilkinson University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Philadelphia © 2010 University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Philadelphia, PA 19104-6324 Published for the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology by the University of Pennsylvania Press. All rights reserved. Published 2010. Production of this book was supported by a publication grant from the Academic Committee of the Iran Heritage Foundation (London) and an award from the Stein-Arnold Expedition Fund of the British Academy. The drawing on p. 304 of the head of a wild bezoar goat is from Harris 1962, Fig. 3a. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING -IN-PUBLICATION DATA Harris, David R. Origins of agriculture in western central Asia : an environmental-archaeological study / David R. Harris. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-1-934536-16-2 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-934536-16-4 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Agriculture—Turkmenistan—Origin. 2. Agriculture—Asia, Central—Origin. 3. Agriculture, Prehistoric—Turkmenistan. 4. Agriculture, Prehistoric—Asia, Central. 5. Excavations (Archaeology)— Turkmenistan. 6. Excavations (Archaeology)—Asia, Central. 7. Turkmenistan—Antiquities. 8. Asia, Central—Antiquities. I. Title. GN855.T85H37 2010 306.3’4909585--dc22 2010009780 This book was printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilikum – Mysterious Jug Prolegomenon to the Problem of Three-Part Pots for Giving Toasts of Welcome
    Ivan Šestan UDK 392.72:738.8 Ethnographic Museum 738.8.045 Zagreb Review paper Croatia Received: February 17, 2009 [email protected] Accepted: February 26, 2009 Bilikum – Mysterious Jug Prolegomenon to the Problem of Three-Part Pots for Giving Toasts of Welcome The article provides a systematic overview of the questions on the shape and symbolism of a three-part pot - bilikum, which was used in Northwestern Croatia and Northeastern Slovenia as a pot from which wine was drunk in honor of the guests who were visiting a house for the first time. Even though any pot suitable for wine drinking could be used, only three-part bili- kum was used only for that purpose. That fact gives bilikum the character of a ritual pot, and logically raises questions on its possible link with the similar Bronze and Iron Age pots. Besides the symbolism of number three, which comes from its shape, the mystery surrounding the pot is enhanced by the legend of three brothers – Čeh, Leh and Meh, which is connected to it. Key words: bilikum, pots, giving toasts, symbolism of pot, ritual pot ilikum belongs to the rich inventory of multi-part pots Bwhose beginnings should apparently be sought for in different periods of the Bronze and Iron Age. Pots made up of several smaller pots which are connected were well known in archeology for their various shapes, how- ever, only a small number of them existed in the inventory of the so-called tradition- al culture. Moreover, the ones coming from traditional culture were usually made up of only two or three parts, while archeological pots could be composed out of ten or more parts (Picture 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Symbolic Role of Early Pottery in the Near East
    THE SOCIAL AND SYMBOLIC ROLE OF EARLY POTTERY IN THE NEAR EAST A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY BURCU YILDIRIM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2019 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu Erciyas Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman Supervisor Examining Committee Members (first name belongs to the chairperson of the jury and the second name belongs to supervisor) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Marie H. Gates (Bilkent Uni., ARK) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman (METU, SA) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Neyir K. Bostancı (Hacettepe Uni., ARK) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk Serin (METU, SA) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Yiğit H. Erbil (Hacettepe Uni., ARK) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Burcu Yıldırım Signature : iii ABSTRACT THE SOCIAL AND SYMBOLIC ROLE OF EARLY POTTERY IN THE NEAR EAST Yıldırım, Burcu Ms., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor: Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Agnese Vacca - Luca Peyronel - Valentina Oselini
    RECENT RESULTS FROM ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH AT HELAWA, SOUTHWEST ERBIL PLAIN, IRAQI KURDISTAN AGNESE VACCA - LUCA PEYRONEL - VALENTINA OSELINI Aliawa Aliawa Helawa Helawa https://sketchfab.com/epas https://sketchfab.com/epas https://sketchfab.com/epas 2013 and 2015: Intensive surface collection 2016-2017: Excavation in Areas B and D Systematic and Intensive Surface Collection Excavations 700 600 VII MILLENNIUM BC V MILLENNIUM BC 500 400 300 200 100 0 IV MILLENNIUM BC II MILLENNIUM BC LC 1-2 LC 3 MB II/LB I Peyronel, L. and Vacca, A. 2015, Origini 37: 89-127. Peyronel, L. and Vacca, A. 2015, Origini 37: 89-127. LC 1-2 LC 3 Peyronel, L. and Vacca, A. 2015, Origini 37: 89-127. Ubaid Unknown 13% 21% LU-LC 5% MB-LB 22% LC 1-3 34% Hassuna: 1% CA D Samarra: 1% Halaf: 3% Ubaid: 13% LU-LC: 5% LC 1-3: 34% MB-LB: 22% MB-LB pottery distribution on the surface (%) Area B Area D D1: Phase 2b D3: Phase 2a AREA D 2017 P.86 W.83 L.97 153 157 166 W.89 W.84 Sq. D3 Sq. D1 I.92 2016 L.97 D1: Phase 3 I.91 Sq.D4 W.96 I.93 P.153 L.158 L.152 W.95 L.87 L.99 D3, D4 D3, D4: Phase 2b Phase 2 2016 Grey Ware L a t e K h a b u r 98 Tot: 118 W a 20 r e Area D Helawa PlainW PKW AREA D: Phase 2 (Mitannian I – LB I) Phase 3 (Late MB – LB I) D1: Phase 4b D1: Phase 4c Helawa, Area D Nineveh, Middle and Qalinj Agha, 400 Upper Ninevite 3 Level IV LC2 350 300 250 200 LC3 150 100 50 0 Other Grey Ware Area D – Phases 4.A-B (early LC 3) Filling of P.1: cartridge cases and a pack of Buisness Club cigarettes, produced and traded since 1999 (terminus post quem).
    [Show full text]
  • Figural Motifs on Halaf Pottery: an Iconographical Study of Late Neolithic Society in Northern Mesopotamia
    BAHATTİN İPEK BAHATTİN FIGURAL MOTIFS ON HALAF POTTERY: AN ICONOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF LATE NEOLITHIC SOCIETY IN NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA A Master’s Thesis ICONOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF LATE NEOLITHIC NEOLITHIC LATE OF STUDY ICONOGRAPHICAL FIGURAL MOTIFS ON HALAF POTTERY: AN AN POTTERY: HALAF ON MOTIFS FIGURAL SOCIETY IN NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA NORTHERN IN SOCIETY by BAHATTİN İPEK Department of Archaeology İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara Bilkent Bilkent August 2019 University 2019 To my father and my family FIGURAL MOTIFS ON HALAF POTTERY: AN ICONOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF LATE NEOLITHIC SOCIETY IN NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of Ġhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by BAHATTĠN ĠPEK In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN ARCHAEOLOGY THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY ĠHSAN DOĞRAMACI BĠLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA AUGUST 2019 ABSTRACT FIGURAL MOTIFS ON HALAF POTTERY: AN ICONOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF LATE NEOLITHIC SOCIETY IN NORTHERN MESOPOTAMIA Ġpek, Bahattin M. A., Department of Archaeology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Marie-Henriette Gates August 2019 Information about the lifestyles of ancient cultures, their daily activities, religious beliefs, close or long distance trade relations, or cultural interactions come from their products. Ancient material productions can be briefly mentioned by examples such as stone tools, pottery, and secular or religious buildings. Thanks to excavations or socio-cultural surveys, we are able to make comments on the ancient societies' materials. Wall paintings, motifs or scenes on pottery provide us important information about the lifestyles or religious beliefs of ancient cultures. The aim of this thesis is to give information about the motifs on Halaf pottery, which belongs to the Late Neolithic period and spread over a wide area in Northern Mesopotamia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubaid Pottery from Kashkashok Ii -Typology and Chronology
    AL-RAFIDAN Vol. XIV 1993 19 UBAID POTTERY FROM KASHKASHOK II -TYPOLOGY AND CHRONOLOGY - Tatsundo KOIZUMI* 1. Introduction The following article concerns the Northern Ubaid Pottery from Tell Kashkashok, tell No. II in northeastern Syria. The Kashkashok site was excavated in 1987, 1988 by the expedition team from Tokyo University. I took part in the last season and had the opportunity to investigate the Ubaid and post-Ubaid1' pottery, most of which were funerary objects from the cemetery in the tell. The pottery vessels were complete enough to be classified according to vessel shape. In a previous report (Koizumi 1991], vessels were classified into twenty-one forms according to the author's original scale, patterns of decoration were described for each example, and brief comparisons with pottery from other sites were made. In this paper, we shall define our particular typology, explain its merits, variables and classification, make comparative analyses using a particular method, and present some interpretations arising from our approach. Our goal here is to propose a reliable chronology for the Ubaid pottery in Kashkashok, which reflects distinctive patterns of changing modes in the shape, design, and technology in northern Mesopota mia, and at the same time represents notable features of regional variation in forms and/or attributes around the fifth millennium B.C. When considering problems concerning current research into Ubaid pottery, some points about the Northern Ubaid are particularly relevant. Substantial studies in Ubaid pottery chronology began around the 1950s, principally on the basis of stratigraphic information from Tepe Gawra. In 1949, A.L. Perkins proposed that, although both Northern and Southern Ubaid cultures, deriving from an identifiable origin, had formed one culture complex, they pursued their own courses and developed into separate cultures in the subsequent period [Perkins 1949: 198-99].
    [Show full text]
  • Millennium BC in the Population of the Central Iranian
    Durham E-Theses Mobility and economic transition in the 5th to the 2nd millennium B.C. in the population of the Central Iranian Plateau, Tepe Hissar AFSHAR, ZAHRA How to cite: AFSHAR, ZAHRA (2014) Mobility and economic transition in the 5th to the 2nd millennium B.C. in the population of the Central Iranian Plateau, Tepe Hissar, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11064/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Mobility and Economic Transition in the 5th to the 2nd Millennium B.C. in the Population of the Central Iranian Plateau, Tepe Hissar Zahra Afshar Ustinov College Submitted as Qualification for: Doctorate of Philosophy Archaeology Department Durham University 2014 Abstract Mobility and economic transition in the 5th to the 2nd millennium B.C. in the population of the Central Iranian Plateau, Tepe Hissar Zahra Afshar Iranian archaeology has had a keen interest in exploring unexplained events occurring during the 5th to the 2nd millennium B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chakhmaq Abstract.Pdf
    The First Farming Village in Northeast Iran and Turan: Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq and Beyond February 10 - 11, 2014 Program and Abstracts February 10th (Monday):(Advanced Research Building A, 107) 13:00-13:10 Opening address Akira Tsuneki (University of Tsukuba) 13:10-13:30 Geologic setting of Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq Ken-ichiro Hisada (University of Tsukuba) 13:30-13:50 The site of Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq Akira Tsuneki (University of Tsukuba) 13:50-14:10 Radiocarbon dating of charcoal remains excavated from Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq Toshio Nakamura (Nagoya University) 14:10-14:40 Coffee break 14:40-15:00 Pottery and other objects from Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq Akira Tsuneki (University of Tsukuba) 15:00-15:20 Mineralogical study of pottery from Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq Masanori Kurosawa (University of Tsukuba) 15:20-15:40 Figurines of Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq Setsuo Furusato (Matsudo City Board) 15:40-16:10 Coffee break 16:10-16:30 Neolithisation of Eastern Iran : New insights through the study of the faunal remains of Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq Marjan Mashkour (Central National de la Recherche Scientifique) 16:30-16:50 Charred remains from Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq, and a consideration of early wheat diversity on the eastern margins of the Fertile Crescent Dorian Fuller (University College London) 18:00-20:00 Welcome party II February 11th (Tuesday): (Advanced Research Building B, 108) 10:00-10:20 Vegetation of the Chakhmaq site based on charcoal identification Ken-ichi Tanno (Yamaguchi University) 10:20-10:40 Human remains from Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq Akira
    [Show full text]
  • Island Archaeology and the Origins of Seafaring in the Eastern Mediterranean
    An offprint from ISLAND ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE ORIGINS OF SEAFARING IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN Proceedings of the Wenner Gren Workshop held at Reggio Calabria on October 19-21, 2012 In memory of John D. Evans Eurasian Prehistory Guest Editors: Albert J. Ammerman and Thomas Davis PART ONE (Eurasian Prehistory 10/2013) Introduction 1. Introduction Albert J. Ammerman 2. Chronological framework Thomas W. Davis Placing island archaeology and early voyaging in context 3. The origins of mammals on the Mediterranean islands as an indicator of early voyaging Jean-Denis Vigne 4. Cosmic impact, the Younger Dryas, Abu Hureyra, and the inception of agriculture in Western Asia Andrew M. T. Moore and Douglas J. Kennett 5. The homelands of the Cyprus colonizers: selected comments Ofer Bar-Yosef 6. Marine resources in the Early Neolithic of the Levant: their relevance to early seafaring Daniella E. Bar-Yosef Mayer 7. Early seafaring and the archaeology of submerged landscapes Geoff N. Bailey Case studies A. Cyprus 8. Tracing the steps in the fieldwork at the sites of Aspros and Nissi Beach on Cyprus Albert J. Ammerman 9. Akrotiri-Aetokremnos (Cyprus) 20 years later: an assessment of its significance Alan H. Simmons 10. The transportation of mammals to Cyprus sheds light on early voyaging and boats in the Mediterranean Sea Jean-Denis Vigne, Antoine Zazzo, Isabella Carrère, François Briois and Jean Guilaine 11. On the chipped stone assemblages at Klimonas and Shillourokambos and their links with the mainland François Briois and Jean Guilaine PART TWO (Eurasian Prehistory 11/2014) 12. Temporal placement and context of Cyro-PPNA activity on Cyprus Sturt W.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 957.91 K
    Petrographic Analysis of the 6th Millennium B.C. Dalma Ceramics from Northwestern and Central Zagros Yukiko Tonoike* Department of Anthropology, Yale University, USA (Received: 05/ 05/ 2012 ; Received in Revised form: 10/ 07/ 2012; Accepted: 22/ 09/ 2012) Sixth millennium BC Dalma ceramics from the northwestern and central Zagros have previously been described as being impossible to distinguish using decorative style analysis in spite of the great distance between the two regions. In this study, petrographic (thin section) analysis and a small-scale electron microprobe project was carried out on the ceramics of the two regions, as well as a small sample of the preceding and following Hajji Firuz and Pisdeli period ceramics. The petrographic analysis of microstructure reveals minute differences in manufacturing techniques. The results suggest that the Dalma ceramics were a distinct ceramic group with a great degree of variability, suggesting that they were made locally at the household level by individual potters and their preferences for ceramic manufacturing techniques. However, there was enough communication between the different regions to keep the stylistic and to a certain degree ceramic manufacturing technique uniform over this wide area. The analyses suggest that Dalma ceramics were spread by small groups of nomadic pastoralists who maintained a relationship with the agricultural Dalma villages. In this way, petrographic analysis of ceramics and geospatial analysis allow for a better understanding of the distribution of Dalma ceramics, and suggest the role of nomadic populations in their spread. Keywords: Ceramic petrography; Electron microprobe analysis; Dalma ceramics; Interaction; Nomadic migration Introduction and Bottema 1982; Young Jr 1967; Zohary 1969).
    [Show full text]
  • Gurga Chiya and Tepe Marani: New Excavations in the Shahrizor Plain, Iraqi Kurdistan1
    IRAQ (2016) 78 253–284 Doi:10.1017/irq.2016.6 253 GURGA CHIYA AND TEPE MARANI: NEW EXCAVATIONS IN THE SHAHRIZOR PLAIN, IRAQI KURDISTAN1 By DAVID WENGROW,ROBERT CARTER,GARETH BRERETON,MARY SHEPPERSON, SAMI JAMIL HAMARASHI,SABER AHMED SABER,ANDREW BEVAN,DORIAN FULLER, HELEN HIMMELMAN,HANNA SOSNOWSKA and LARA GONZALEZ CARRETERO Gurga Chiya and Tepe Marani are small, adjacent mounds located close to the town of Halabja in the southern part of the Shahrizor Plain, one of the most fertile regions of Iraqi Kurdistan. Survey and excavation at these previously unexplored sites is beginning to produce evidence for human settlement spanning the sixth to the fourth millennia, c. 5600–3300 cal. B.C. In Mesopotamian chronology this corresponds to the Late Neolithic through to Chalcolithic periods; the Halaf, Ubaid, and Uruk phases of conventional culture history. In Iraqi Kurdistan, documentation of these periods—which witnessed many important transformations in prehistoric village life—is currently very thin. Here we offer a preliminary report on the emerging results from the Shahrizor Plain, with a particular focus on the description of material culture (ceramic and lithic assemblages), in order to establish a benchmark for further research. We also provide a detailed report on botanical remains and accompanying radiocarbon dates, which allow us to place this new evidence in a wider comparative framework. A further, brief account is given of Late Bronze Age material culture from the upper layers at Gurga Chiya. We conclude with observations on the significance of the Shahrizor Plain for wider research into the later prehistory of the Middle East, and the importance of preserving and investigating its archaeological record.
    [Show full text]