DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatial Effect on Ecology and Behavior of Lavinia Symmetricus in a Riparian Habitat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatial Effect on Ecology and Behavior of Lavinia Symmetricus in a Riparian Habitat Spatial effect on ecology and behavior of Lavinia symmetricus in a riparian habitat Brenna Lizbeth Bolanos1, Clarisa Areli Martinez2, Brandon Alexander Quintana3, Kevin Salgado4 1University of California, Merced; 2University of California, Irvine; 3University of California, Santa Barbara; 4University of California, Riverside ABSTRACT Fish are an essential link to the dynamiC of their environment. They are able to serve as bioindiCators of a rivers health, and when abundant Can help understand a rivers eCosystem. The California roach (Lavinia symmetricus) is a widespread speCies found in high densities in various waterways. In the Eel River, heavy rain winters Cause algal blooms and water levels to drop during the spring and summer, resulting in possible CompliCations for the fish. This Causes eCologiCal ConCern towards the speCies due to their ability to reduCe algae and be a food sourCe in the rivers. This study aimed to look at how a high preCipitation winter affeCts the miCrohabitat distribution, population eCology, and behavior of the California roach during the spring. Fish were Caught and measured at seven sites along the river. Algal Cover and veloCity of the river were also noted at these loCations. Additionally, an observational study was ConduCted to examine the behavior of the fish. There was a positive Correlation between algal Cover and California roach abundanCe. California roach were also more abundant and larger downstream riffles. As veloCity of the water inCreased, fish abundanCe inCreased, but size deCreased. California roach fed more often in groups of 10, and sought shelter upstream riffles. These results provide distributional and behavioral insight on a speCies eCologiCally important to the Eel River, and add to the food web dynamiC of the eCosystem. Keywords: Lavinia symmetricus, Eel River, miCrohabitat, behavior plastiCity, riffle INTRODUCTION been found to suppress growing populations of zooplankton and indireCtly SpeCies of fish in abundanCe are essential benefit miCrozooplankton in decline (Thorp to the dynamiC funCtion of river and Casper 2003). In addition, fish eCosystems. Fish make up a large Contribute to river nutrient CyCles through proportion of mass in many river the dispersal of nutrients stored in their eCosystems, and their eCologiCal niChes may tissue as they travel up and down streams not be filled by other speCies (Mazumder et (McIntyre et al 2008). These studies suggest al. 2016). For example, in the St. LawrenCe that fish fauna distributions and River, yellow perCh (Perca flavescens) have CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3N37W Spring 2019 1/8 abundanCes are able to serve as biomass in springs and summers following bioindiCators for overall river health winters with heavy rainfall (Power et al. 2008). (Chovaene et al. 2003). TypiCally, Additionally, the water level and flow rate bioindiCators have been used to inform of the river deCrease, affeCting the river management and Conservation; abundanCe of riffles found along the Eel however, the relative abundanCe and River. These riffles form small pools where distribution of fish Can serve as a the California roach prefer to stay. bioindiCator to examine the role of river Furthermore, riffles have been shown to miCrohabitats. affeCt the distribution of small fish (Jonsson HistoriCally, researCh on the role of fish in 1991). These findings raise questions freshwater systems has foCused more on regarding how these biotiC and abiotiC the effeCts of large fish speCies. However, variables influenCe the California roach. smaller fish Can also have important The California roach is an abundant impacts in these systems. For example, the speCies in the Eel River and serves an presenCe of small but abundant sCulpin important role in its food web. The seasonal proved important to their eCologiCal role variations that affeCt their primary food within their respeCtive habitats sourCe and the water level of the Eel River (Baumsteiger 2012). SCulpin Control other raise eCologiCal ConCern for the roach in this fish populations by preying on their eggs area. Additionally, little researCh has been and serve as a food sourCe for bigger fish, done on the behaviors of California roach, mammals, and birds (Baumsteiger 2012). whiCh Could serve as a bridge for trophiC One suCh important small fish is the interactions and Conservation. Therefore, California roach. This fish is Common and we studied how the California roach native to Central and Northern California, responds to algal Cover in small pools ranging from the San Joaquin to the Eel formed by upstream and downstream River (Brown et al. 1991). These fish typically riffles, as well as how these riffles affeCt range from 2 to 10 Cm and are resilient to them. Points of interest were roach intermittent waters. Roaches are stress miCrohabitat distribution, population tolerant and are able to survive in low levels of eCology, and behavior along the Eel river. dissolved oxygen and Can be Capable of SpeCifiCally, we prediCted that: withstanding a wide range of temperatures (CeCh et al. 1990). Although the California 1) more fish will be present and average roach is a small native fish, this species may roach size will inCrease downstream impaCt its environment in a big way. riffles. Areas downstream riffles form Studies on the California roach have pools with lower flow rates, examined biotiC and abiotiC factors that providing an ideal habitat for affeCt them. ResearCh done on the Eel River California roach (MarChetti and in California has shown that the California Moyle 2001) roach reduCes the presenCe of filamentous 2) fish will be more abundant in areas green algae, while their absenCe inCreases of high algal Cover. California roach it. (Power 1990). The predominant alga of feed on algae, and small fish speCies the river, Cladophora glomerata, a primary favor areas with an abundanCe in food sourCe for roach, reaches peak food. (KulCzyCki et al 1981) CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3N37W Spring 2019 2/8 3) inCreased water veloCity will deCrease roach abundanCe and average size. Studies have found that small fish speCies are negatively Correlated with high river veloCity, whiCh Could affeCt their physiology and distribution (Webb 2004; Liao 2007) 4) California roach will feed more often in groups due to sChooling. This has been shown to be a proteCtion meChanism that may allow fish to initiate feeding (Hager and Helfman 1991) 5) fish upstream riffles will seek shelter Figure 1. Fish collection sites. The seven ColleCtion more often. Upstream riffles have sites (orange circles) are located along the Eel River higher veloCity flow and water in Northern California. Traps were plaCed at eaCh of turbulenCe that may harm small fish these seven loCations to Catch California roaChes. speCies (Aadland 2011). 2.2 Experimental Design: Roach Population METHODS Structure 2.1 Natural History of Study System To test the effeCt of algal Cover and riffles on California roach, we ConduCted this ResearCh was ConduCted in Spring, May 9- study at seven sites (Figure 1) along the Eel 12, 2019, at the Angelo Coast Range river where riffles were present. At site one, Reserve (39.739167°, -123.630833°) in three trials were ConduCted, two at site MendoCino County, California along the two, four at site three, three at site four, South Fork of the Eel River (Figure 1). The three at site five, and one at sites six and study area is Characterized by a seven totaling 34 trials. The loCations within Mediterranean Climate with wet, Cool these sites Consisted of small, low river flow winters and dry, warm summers. Average pools upstream and downstream from preCipitation is 215.6 cm per year. Due to riffles. At each of the riffles, one 42x23 Cm limited human impact, the Angelo Coast baited minnow trap was placed 10 m before Range Reserve allows for researCh to be and after the riffle, approximately one done under pristine water Conditions meter deep. Traps were baited with lunCh (Howard et al. 2004), making it an ideal meat/sausages and left for approximately study site for aquatiC speCies, suCh as the 24 hours. Upon retrieval, total amount of California roach. roaches were noted, 10 were randomly measured to estimate average fish size. CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3N37W Spring 2019 3/8 2.3 Experimental Design: Microhabitat 2.5 Statistical Analysis Abiotic Factors All ColleCted data was analyzed using JMP At each of the seven sites, algal Cover and statistiCal software v13. We ran a t-test to veloCity of the river were measured to test Compare average California roach size their effeCt on the California roach. Before before and after riffles at our 7 study sites, and after the riffles, 10 m point transeCts for a total of 34 repliCates. Linear were taken to measure perCent algal Cover regressions were used to look at the effeCt from the trap to the riffle. This was done by of algal Cover on fish abundanCe, and the visually estimating the algal Cover on a roCk effeCt of veloCity of the river on the at every meter. To measure the veloCity of abundanCe and size of the California roach the water, a ping-pong ball was placed in across the 7 sites. Chi-squared test were ran the water 3 m before the trap. The distanCe to evaluate the variation of feeding and traveled and time it took the ball to reach shelter seeking behavior on group sizes of the trap was divided to obtain veloCity of two, four, six, eight, and ten fish. the water in meters per seCond. RESULTS 2.4 Experimental Design: Roach Feeding and Protection Behavior In total, 700 California roaches were Caught across the seven sites. 37, 126, 475, In order to test their behavior, California 55, 7, 0, and 0 fish were Caught for sites one roach observations were made at three of through seven, respeCtively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Systematics of Western North American Cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)
    Zootaxa 3586: 281–303 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EFA9728-D4BB-467E-A0E0-0DA89E7E30AD Molecular systematics of western North American cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) SUSANA SCHÖNHUTH 1, DENNIS K. SHIOZAWA 2, THOMAS E. DOWLING 3 & RICHARD L. MAYDEN 1 1 Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, 3507 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. E-mail S.S: [email protected] ; E-mail RLM: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology and Curator of Fishes, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The phylogenetic or evolutionary relationships of species of Cypriniformes, as well as their classification, is in a era of flux. For the first time ever, the Order, and constituent Families are being examined for relationships within a phylogenetic context. Relevant findings as to sister-group relationships are largely being inferred from analyses of both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Like the vast majority of Cypriniformes, due to an overall lack of any phylogenetic investigation of these fishes since Hennig’s transformation of the discipline, changes in hypotheses of relationships and a natural classification of the species should not be of surprise to anyone. Basically, for most taxa no properly supported phylogenetic hypothesis has ever been done; and this includes relationships with reasonable taxon and character sampling of even families and subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • PREHISTORIC FORAGING PATTERNS at CA-SAC-47 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department Of
    PREHISTORIC FORAGING PATTERNS AT CA-SAC-47 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Anthropology California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Anthropology by Justin Blake Cairns SUMMER 2016 © 2016 Justin Blake Cairns ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii PREHISTORIC FORAGING PATTERNS AT CA-SAC-47 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A Thesis by Justin Blake Cairns Approved by: ________________________________, Committee Chair Mark E. Basgall, Ph.D. ________________________________, Second Reader Jacob L. Fisher, Ph.D. ____________________________ Date iii Student: Justin Blake Cairns I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. __________________________________, Graduate Coordinator _______________ Jacob Fisher, Ph.D. Date Department of Anthropology iv Abstract of PREHISTORIC FORAGING PATTERNS AT CA-SAC-47 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA by Justin Blake Cairns Subsistence studies conducted on regional archaeological deposits indicate that in the Sacramento Delta, as in the rest of the Central Valley, there is a decrease in foraging efficiency during the Late Period. A recently excavated site, CA-SAC-47, provides direct evidence of subsistence strategies in the form of faunal and plant remains. This faunal assemblage is compared to direct evidence of subsistence from Delta sites SAC-42, SAC-43, SAC-65, SAC-145, and SAC-329. The results and implications of this direct evidence are used to address site variability and resource selectivity. ___________________________________, Committee Chair Mark E.
    [Show full text]
  • LATE MIOCENE FISHES of the CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH and IDAHO By
    LATE MIOCENE FISHES OF THE CACHE VALLEY MEMBER, SALT LAKE FORMATION, UTAH AND IDAHO by PATRICK H. MCCLELLAN AND GERALD R. SMITH MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 208 Ann Arbor, December 17, 2020 ISSN 0076-8405 P U B L I C A T I O N S O F T H E MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 208 GERALD SMITH, Editor The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series—the Miscellaneous Publications and the Occasional Papers. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. Occasionally the Museum publishes contributions outside of these series. Beginning in 1990 these are titled Special Publications and Circulars and each is sequentially numbered. All submitted manuscripts to any of the Museum’s publications receive external peer review. The Occasional Papers, begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are published separately. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A complete list of publications on Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fishes, I nsects, Mollusks, and other topics is available.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest
    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sequoia National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Biologist Planner Regional Office, Sequoia National Forest and Washington Office Enterprise Program For: Sequoia National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Chub (Actinopterygii, Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae) from the Middle Miocene (Early Clarendonian) Aldrich Station Formation, Lyon County, Nevada
    Paludicola 7(4):137-157 May 2010 © by the Rochester Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology A NEW CHUB (ACTINOPTERYGII, CYPRINIFORMES, CYPRINIDAE) FROM THE MIDDLE MIOCENE (EARLY CLARENDONIAN) ALDRICH STATION FORMATION, LYON COUNTY, NEVADA Thomas S. Kelly Research Associate, Vertebrate Paleontology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007 ABSTRACT A new chub, Lavinia lugaskii, is described from the middle Miocene (early Clarendonian) Aldrich Station Formation of Lyon County, Nevada. Lavinia lugaskii represents a basal member of the Lavinia-Hesperoleucus lineage, indicating that this lineage diverged from a common ancestor with Mylopharodon before 12.5 – 12.0 million years before present. This is the oldest recognized species of Lavinia and the first new chub species to be documented from the Miocene of Nevada in over 30 years. INTRODUCTION METHODS A sample of fish fossils is now known from Measurements of the skeletons and individual localities that occur in an outlier of the Aldrich Station bones were made to the nearest 0.1 mm with a vernier Formation, exposed just west of Mickey Canyon on the caliper. Measurements of the pharyngeal teeth were northwest flank of the Pine Groove Hills, Lyon made with an optical micrometer to the nearest 0.01 County, Nevada. All of the fish remains were mm. Estimated standard lengths for partial skeletons recovered from a single stratigraphic level represented were extrapolated using the mean ratios of the standard by a thin (~0.06 m) shale bed. This level can be traced length to landmark measurements (e.g., ratios of the SL laterally for about 0.5 km and yielded fossil fish to head length, pectoral fin origin to pelvic fin origin remains at several points along its exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • State of California the Resources Agency DEPARTMENT of FISH and GAME
    State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME THE THICKTAIL CHUB, GILA CRASSICAUDA, AN EXTINCT CALIFORNIA FISH by Terry J. Mills and Kathy A. Mamika Inland Fisheries, Sacramento Inland Fisheries Endangered Species Program Special Publication 80-2 May 1980 LDA Endangered Species Program Special Publications are nonrefereed reports generally of two types: they may contain information of sufficient importance to be preserved for future reference but which may not be currently appropriate for journal publications; or they may be reports which contain information of current significance that warrants early dissemination to biologists, managers, and administrators but which may later be submitted for formal scientific publica- tion. These reports can be cited in publications, but their manuscript status should be recognized. Subject matter reflects the broad array of research and management conducted in California on nongame species of reptiles, amphibians, and nonmarine fishes and invertebrates, with primary emphasis on endangered, threatened, and rare taxa. Inquiries concerning any particular report should be directed to the Inland Fisheries Branch, 1416 Ninth Street, Sacramento, California 95814. THE THICKTAIL CHUB, GILA CRASSICAUDA, AN EXTINCT CALIFORNIA FISH1/ by Terry J. Mills-'- and 3/ Kathy A. Mamika ABSTRACT The thicktail chub, once one of the most abundant fishes of the Central Valley of California, has not been collected during the past 22 years. It is now considered extinct. The loss of this native minnow is believed to be a result of: (1) habitat alteration resulting from drainage of large, shallow lakes and the removal of vegetative cover, and (2) the intro- duction of exotic fishes which competed with and preyed on thicktail chub.
    [Show full text]
  • Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)
    Zootaxa 3586: 281–303 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EFA9728-D4BB-467E-A0E0-0DA89E7E30AD Molecular systematics of western North American cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) SUSANA SCHÖNHUTH 1, DENNIS K. SHIOZAWA 2, THOMAS E. DOWLING 3 & RICHARD L. MAYDEN 1 1 Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, 3507 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. E-mail S.S: [email protected] ; E-mail RLM: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology and Curator of Fishes, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The phylogenetic or evolutionary relationships of species of Cypriniformes, as well as their classification, is in a era of flux. For the first time ever, the Order, and constituent Families are being examined for relationships within a phylogenetic context. Relevant findings as to sister-group relationships are largely being inferred from analyses of both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Like the vast majority of Cypriniformes, due to an overall lack of any phylogenetic investigation of these fishes since Hennig’s transformation of the discipline, changes in hypotheses of relationships and a natural classification of the species should not be of surprise to anyone. Basically, for most taxa no properly supported phylogenetic hypothesis has ever been done; and this includes relationships with reasonable taxon and character sampling of even families and subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Freshwater, Anadromous, and Euryhaline Fishes of California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 86(4):244-258 2000 A LIST OF FRESHWATER, ANADROMOUS, AND EURYHALINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA PETER B. MOYLE Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology University of California, Davis 1 Shields Avenue Davis, California 95616 e-mail: pbmoyle @ ucdavis.edu LIAM H. DAVIS California Department of Fish and Game 7329 Silverado Trail Yountville, California 94558 The freshwater fishes of California include 67 native resident or anadromous species, 53 non-native species, and 5 marine species that occur in fresh water, for a total of 125 species. Within these species, 100 taxa at lower levels (subspecies, Evolutionary Significant Units, runs of anadromous fish) are recognized. The number of freshwater fish species in California is increasing due to invasions of non-native fishes, which are becoming established at a rate of about 1 species every 3 years. Of the native fishes, 5 full species are extinct in California. Thus, the actual number of species maintaining populations in the state is 120. Of extant native species, 15 (22%) are threatened with extinction in the near future. Only 27 native species (40%) can be regarded as having secure populations. INTRODUCTION The fishes of California’s inland waters are a mixture of resident, anadromous, and euryhaline species, both native and non-native. The first attempt to compile a comprehensive list of these species was Evermann and Clark (1931), who listed 78 native species and 32 introduced species. Native species included an anomalous Pacific hagfish, Epatretus stouti, from the Eel River, 14 forms all now considered to be rainbow trout, and 18 other forms that are either no longer recognized as species or were mistakenly considered to be part of the California fish fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reappraisal of the California Roach/Hitch (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, Hesperoleucus/Lavinia) Species Complex
    Zootaxa 4543 (2): 221–240 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4543.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0D3BBCE4-B836-417F-A293-6A93D155A0C7 A reappraisal of the California Roach/Hitch (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, Hesperoleucus/Lavinia) species complex JASON BAUMSTEIGER1,2,4 & PETER B. MOYLE1,3,5 1Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 2Department of Animal Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 3Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 4Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Ave, Stockton, CA 95211 5Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract The California Roach (Hesperoleucus symmetricus) and Hitch (Lavinia exilicauda) form a species complex largely en- demic to California (CA), USA. Using previous studies of this complex along with a recent comprehensive genomic anal- ysis, we developed a highly supported taxonomic hierarchy of two genera, five species, four subspecies and multiple distinct population segments within two presently recognized species. The genera Lavinia and Hesperoleucus are support- ed as representing distinct lineages, despite occasional hybridization between them. While hybridization is one pathway to some speciation in this complex, hierarchical levels correlate nicely between genomic results and earlier morphological work. Hesperoleucus symmetricus is newly divided into four species (H. parvipinnis—Gualala Roach, H. mitrulus— Northern Roach, H. venustus—Coastal Roach, and H.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitch (Lavinia Exilicauda) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Hitch (Lavinia exilicauda) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, January 2018 Web Version, 8/29/2018 Photo: R. Reyes. Public domain. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lavinia- exilicauda-21.jpg. (January 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2017): “North America: Sacramento-San Joaquin, Clear Lake, Russian River, and Pajaro-Salinas river drainages in California, USA.” Status in the United States From NatureServe (2017): “Range includes the Sacramento and San Joaquin drainages; Clear Lake, Lake County; Russian River; and Pajaro and Salinas rivers drainages, California (Moyle 2002, Page and Burr 2011). This species has been introduced in a few reservoirs within the native range, and it occurs in some waters as a result of transport in water diversion aqueducts (Moyle 2002).. [sic]” 1 From Nico (2018): “Status: Established in parts of southern California (Swift et al. 1993).” “McGinnis (1984) stated that this species was apparently introduced into the Russian River of California. Other authors (e.g., Page and Burr 1991) apparently consider it to be native to that drainage.” From Swift et al. (1993): “This species was reported from Pyramid Lake in 1984 […], Lake Silverwood in 1988 […], and one was taken in June 1992 at Pyramid Lake […]. It is possibly established or at least a regular immigrant from central California. […] Kimsey and Fisk (1960) reported one collected in Ramer Lake, Imperial County. Hitch were collected in the spring of 1992 from isolated pools of Aliso Canyon, tributary to Santa Clara River in Soledad Canyon […], and thought to have been there for about 40 years (Tom Hale, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 RUSSIAN RIVER ROACH Lavinia Symmetricus Ssp. Status
    RUSSIAN RIVER ROACH Lavinia symmetricus ssp. Status: Moderate Concern. Although apparently in no danger of extinction, Russian River roach populations could decline or become extirpated from large portions of their range as result of alterations to streams, changes in climate, water withdrawal for urbanization and rural residential development, as well as water demands and pollutant runoff associated with rapidly expanding viticulture. Description: Russian River roach are a small (adult size typically 50-120 mm), bronzy minnow (cyprinid), which are very similar to the Central California roach. However, they differ in having a trim, slender body, a somewhat pointed snout, a slender caudal peduncle and long fins. Russian River roach have a mean of 8.7 dorsal fin rays and 8.1 anal fin rays (Hopkirk 1973). Individuals rarely exceed 120 mm; the largest roach captured during a 2007 survey in Austin Creek, a tributary to the Russian River (Sonoma County), was 116 mm and weighed 20.5 g (Figure 1). The following account of roach morphology is based on information from roach populations outside the Russian River watershed. Roach are small, stout-bodied, minnows with a narrow caudal peduncle and a deeply forked tail. Fish rarely achieve lengths greater than 100 mm total length. The head is large and conical. The eyes are large and the mouth is subterminal and slants at a downward angle. The dorsal fin is short (7-9 rays) and is positioned behind the insertion point of the pelvic fin. The anal fin has between 6-9 rays. The pharyngeal teeth (0,5-4,0) have curved tips with overhanging grinding surfaces of moderate size.
    [Show full text]