DOCSLIB.ORG

References.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
References.Pdf References Abney, S. (1987) The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect, doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Anderson, S. R. (1976) On the notion of subject in ergative languages, in Subject and Topic, C. N. Li (ed.), New York, Academic Press, 1-23. Anderson, S. R. (1977) On mechanism by which languages become ergative, in Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, C. N. Li (ed.), Austin, University of Texas Press, 317-363. Aoun, J. (1981) The formal nature of anaphoric relations, doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Aoun, J. (1985) A Grammar of Anaphora, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press. Babby, L. (1994) “Case theory”, in Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments, C. P. Otero (ed.), London, Routledge, 630-652. Bach, E. (1979) Control in Montague Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry 10: 515-531. Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Baker, M. (1989) Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 513-554. Baker, M., Johnson, K., and Roberts, I. (1989) Passive arguments raised, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219-251. Bechert, J. (1979) Ergativity and the constitution of grammatical relation, in Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, F. Plank (ed.), London, Academic Press, 45-59. Belletti, A. (1988) The case of unaccusatives, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1-34. Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (1981) The syntax of ne, The Linguistic Review 1: 117-154. 365 Benett, D. C., Bynon, T., and Hewitt, B. G. (1995) Subject, Voice and Ergativity, London, SOAS, University of London. Bennardo, G. (1999) The conceptual content of Tongan directionals: mental representations of space in Tongan, Rogorogo Studies 9(2): 39-61. Bennis, H. and Hoekstra, T. (1984) Gaps and parasitic gaps, The Linguistic Review 4: 29-87. Berendsen, E. and Zonnenveld, W. (1984) Universal and non-universal properties of clitics: Greek case, Folia Linguistica 18: 3-21. Besnier, N. (1992) Polynesian languages, in International Encyclopedia of Linguistics 3, W. Bright (ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 245-251. Biggs, B. (1971) The languages of Polynesia, in Current Trends in Linguistics, T. A. Sebeok (ed.), The Hague/Paris, Mouton, 466-505. Bittner, M. (1994) Case, Scope, and Binding, Dordrecht, Kluwer. Bittner, M. and Hale, K. (1996a) The structural determination of case and agreement, Linguistic Inquiry 27(1): 1-68. Bittner, M. and Hale, K. (1996b) Ergativity: toward a theory of a heterogeneous class, Linguistic Inquiry 27(4): 531-604. Blake, B. J. (1977) Case Marking in Australian Languages, Canberra, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. Blake, B. J. (1979) Degrees of ergativity in Australia, in Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, F. Plank (ed.), London, Academic Press, 291-305. Blake, B. J. (1982) The absolutive: its scope in English and Kalkatungu, in Studies in Transitivity, P. Hopper and S. Thompson (eds.), New York, Academic Press, 71-94. Blake, B. J. (1990) Relational Grammar, London, Routledge. Blake, B. J. (1994) Case, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Bobaljik, J. D. (1993) On ergativity and ergative unergatives, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19: 45-88. 366 Bobaljik, J. D. and Jonas, D. (1996) Subject position and the roles of TP, Linguistic Inquiry 27(2): 195-236. Bok-Bennema, R. (1991) Case and Agreement in Inuit, Dordrecht, Foris. Borer, H. (1981) On the definition of variables, Journal of Linguistic Research 1(3). Borer, H. (1983) Parametric Syntax, Dordrecht, Foris. Borer, H. (ed.) (1986) The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Orlando, Academic Press. Borer, H. (1989) Anaphoric AGR, in The Null Subject Parameter, O. Jaeggli and K. J. Safir (eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 69-109. Borsley, R. D. (1996) Modern Phrase Structure Grammar, Oxford, Blackwell. Bowers, J. (1993) The syntax of predication, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591-656. Bresnan, J. (1982) Control and complementation, Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343-434. Bresnan, J. and Mchombo, S.A. (1987) Topic, pronoun and agreement in Chichewa, Language 63: 741-782. Burzio, L. (1986) Italian Syntax, Dordrecht, Reidel. Campana, M. (1992) A movement theory of ergativity, doctoral dissertation, McGill University. Cartier, A. (1979) De-voiced transitive verb sentences in formal Indonesian, in Ergativity: towards a theory of grammatical relations, F. Plank (ed.), London, Academic Press, 161-183. Chao, W. and Sells, P. (1983) On the interpretation of resumptive pronouns, Proceedings of NELS 13: 47-61. Chomsky, N. (1976) Conditions on rules of grammar, in Essays on Form and Interpretation, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 163-210. Chomsky, N. (1977) On wh-movement, in Formal Syntax, P. W. Culicover, A. Akmajian and T. Wasow (eds.), New York/San Francisco/London, Academic Press, 71-132. Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht, Foris. 367 Chomsky, N. (1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, New York, Praeger. Chomsky, N. (1986) Barriers, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press. Chomsky, N. (1991) Some notes on economy of derivation and representation, in Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, R. Freidin (ed.), Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press. Chomsky, N. (1993) A minimalist program for linguistic theory, in The View from Building 20, K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), Cambridge Mass., The MIT Press, 1-52. Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press. Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1977) Filters and control, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425-504. Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1993) The theory of principles and parameters, in Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.), Berlin, New York, Walter de Gruyter. Chung, S. (1976) On the subject of two passive in Indonesian, in Subject and Topic, C. N. Li (ed.), New York, Academic Press, 57-98. Chung, S. (1977) On the gradual nature of syntactic change, in Mechanism of Syntactic Change, C. N. Li (ed.), Austin, University of Texas Press, 3-55. Chung, S. (1978) Case Marking and Grammatical Relations in Polynesian, Austin, University of Texas Press. Chung, S. (1983) The ECP and government in Chamorro, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 207-244. Chung, S. (1983) An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesian, in Studies in Relational Grammar 1, D. M. Perlmutter (ed.), Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 219-217. Chung, S. (1989) On the notion of "null anaphor" in Chamorro in The Null Subject Parameter, O. Jaeggli and K. J. Safir (eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 143-184. Chung, S. and Seiter, W. J. (1980) The history of raising and relativization in Polynesian, Language 56: 622-638. 368 Churchward, C. M. (1953) Tongan Grammar, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Churchward, C. M. (1959) Tongan Dictionary, Nuku'alofa, Tongan Government Printing Press. Clark, R. (1973) Transitivity and case in Eastern Oceanic languages, Oceanic Linguistics 12: 559-605. Clark, R. (1976) Aspects of Proto-Polynesian Syntax, Auckland, Linguistic Society of New Zealand. Clark, R. (1981) Review of Chung, (1978), Language 57: 198-205. Collins, C. (1994) Economy of derivation and the generalized proper binding condition, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 45-61. Comrie, B. (1979) Degrees of ergativity: some Chukchee evidence, in Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, F. Plank (ed.), London, Academic Press, 219-240. Comrie, B. (1989) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology, Oxford, Basil Blackwell. Cook, V. (1988) Chomsky's Universal Grammar, Oxford, Blackwell. Cooreman, A. (1982) Transitivity, ergativity, and topicality in Chamorro narrative discourse, Studies in Languages 6(3). Cooreman, A. (1983) Topic continuity and the voicing system of an ergative language, in Topic-Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study, T. Givón (ed.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins. Cooreman, A. (1984) A functional analysis of passives in Chamorro narrative discourse, Papers in Linguistics 17: 395-428. Cooreman, A. (1988) The antipassive in Chamorro: variations on the theme of transitivity, in Passive and Voice, M. Shibatani (ed.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 561-593. Craig, C. (1976) Properties of basic and derived subjects in Jacaltec, in Subject and Topic, C. N. Li (ed.), New York, Academic Press, 99-123. Culicover, P. W., Akmajian, A., Wasow, T. (eds.) (1977) Formal Syntax, New York, Academic Press. 369 Cumming, S. and Wouk, F. (1987) Is there “discourse ergativity” in Austronesian languages? Lingua 71: 271-296. Cummins, S. (1976) Relation-changing rules in Mandarin, doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto. DeLancey, S. (1981) An interpretatino of split ergativity and related patterns, Language 57: 626-657. Déprez, V. (1992) Raising constructions in Haitian Creole, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 191-231. Dixon, R. M. W. (1972) The Dyirbal Language of North Queesnland, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Dixon, R. M. W. (1977) The syntactic development of Australian languages, in Mechanism of Syntactic Change, C. N. Li (ed.), Austin, University of Texas Press, 365-415. Dixon, R. M. W. (1979) Ergativity, Language 55: 59-138. Dixon, R. M. W. (1994) Ergativity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Doron, E. (1986) The pronominal “copula” as agreement clitic, in Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, H. Borer (ed.), Orlando, Academic Press, 313-332. England, N. C. (1988) Mam voice, in Passive and Voice, M. Shibatani (ed.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 525-545. Estival, D. and Myhill, J. (1988)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modeling Language Variation and Universals: a Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing
    Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing Edoardo Ponti, Helen O ’Horan, Yevgeni Berzak, Ivan Vulic, Roi Reichart, Thierry Poibeau, Ekaterina Shutova, Anna Korhonen To cite this version: Edoardo Ponti, Helen O ’Horan, Yevgeni Berzak, Ivan Vulic, Roi Reichart, et al.. Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing. 2018. hal-01856176 HAL Id: hal-01856176 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01856176 Preprint submitted on 9 Aug 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing Edoardo Maria Ponti∗ Helen O’Horan∗∗ LTL, University of Cambridge LTL, University of Cambridge Yevgeni Berzaky Ivan Vuli´cz Department of Brain and Cognitive LTL, University of Cambridge Sciences, MIT Roi Reichart§ Thierry Poibeau# Faculty of Industrial Engineering and LATTICE Lab, CNRS and ENS/PSL and Management, Technion - IIT Univ. Sorbonne nouvelle/USPC Ekaterina Shutova** Anna Korhonenyy ILLC, University of Amsterdam LTL, University of Cambridge Understanding cross-lingual variation is essential for the development of effective multilingual natural language processing (NLP) applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Universals in Phonology This Article A
    UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2007) (Commissioned for special issue of The Linguistic Review, 2008, Harry van der Hulst, ed.) Universals in Phonology ABSTRACT This article asks what is universal about phonological systems. Beginning with universals of segment inventories, a distinction is drawn between descriptive universals (where the effect of different theoretical frameworks is minimized) vs. analytic universals (which are specific-theory- dependent). Since there are few absolute universals such as “all languages have stops” and “all languages have at least two degrees of vowel height”, theory-driven or “architectural” universals concerning distinctive features and syllable structure are also considered. Although several near- universals are also mentioned, the existence of conflicting “universal tendencies” and contradictory resolutions naturally leads into questions concerning the status of markedness and synchronic explanation in phonology. While diachrony is best at accounting for typologically unusual and language-specific phonological properties, the absolute universals discussed in this study are clearly grounded in synchrony. 1. Introduction My colleague John Ohala likes to tell the following mythical story about a lecture that the legendary Roman Jakobson gives upon arrival at Harvard University some time in the 1940s. The topic is child language and phonological universals, a subject which Prof. Jakobson addresses in his Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze (1941). In his also legendary strong Russian accent, Jakobson makes the pronouncement, “In all languages, first utterance of child, [pa]!” 1 He goes on to explain that it is a matter of maximal opposition: “[p] is the consonant most consonant, and [a] is the vowel most vowel.” As the joke continues, a very concerned person in the audience raises his hand and is called on: “But, professor, my child’s first utterance was [tSik].” Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Order, Parameters and the Extended COMP
    Alice Davison, University of Iowa [email protected] January 2006 Word order, parameters, and the Extended COMP projection Abstract The structure of finite CP shows some unexpected syntactic variation in the marking of finite subordinate clauses in the Indic languages, which otherwise are strongly head-final.. Languages with relative pronouns also have initial complementizers and conjunctions. Languages with final yes/no question markers allow final complementizers, either demonstratives or quotative participles. These properties define three classes, one with only final CP heads (Sinhala), one with only initial CP heads (Hindi, Panjabi, Kashmiri) and others with both possibilities. The lexical differences of final vs initial CP heads argue for expanding the CP projection into a number of specialized projections, whose heads are all final (Sinhala), all initial, or mixed. These projections explain the systematic variation in finite CPs in the Indic languages, with the exception of some additional restrictions and anomalies in the Eastern group. 1. Introduction In this paper, I examine two topics in the syntactic structure of clauses in the Indic languages. The first topic has to do with the embedding of finite clauses and especially about how embedded finite clauses are morphologically marked. The second topic focuses on patterns of linear order in languages, parameters of directionality in head position. The two topics intersect in the position of these markers of finite subordinate clauses in the Indic languages. These markers can be prefixes or suffixes, and I will propose that they are heads of functional projections, just as COMP is traditionally regarded as head of CP. The Indic languages are all fundamentally head-final languages; the lexically heads P, Adj, V and N are head-final in the surface structure, while only the functional head D is not.
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: a Case Study from Koro
    Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro By Jessica Cleary-Kemp A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair Assistant Professor Peter S. Jenks Professor William F. Hanks Summer 2015 © Copyright by Jessica Cleary-Kemp All Rights Reserved Abstract Serial Verb Constructions Revisited: A Case Study from Koro by Jessica Cleary-Kemp Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair In this dissertation a methodology for identifying and analyzing serial verb constructions (SVCs) is developed, and its application is exemplified through an analysis of SVCs in Koro, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. SVCs involve two main verbs that form a single predicate and share at least one of their arguments. In addition, they have shared values for tense, aspect, and mood, and they denote a single event. The unique syntactic and semantic properties of SVCs present a number of theoretical challenges, and thus they have invited great interest from syntacticians and typologists alike. But characterizing the nature of SVCs and making generalizations about the typology of serializing languages has proven difficult. There is still debate about both the surface properties of SVCs and their underlying syntactic structure. The current work addresses some of these issues by approaching serialization from two angles: the typological and the language-specific. On the typological front, it refines the definition of ‘SVC’ and develops a principled set of cross-linguistically applicable diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisymmetry Kayne, Richard (1995)
    CAS LX 523 Syntax II (1) A Spring 2001 March 13, 2001 qp Paul Hagstrom Week 7: Antisymmetry BE 33 Kayne, Richard (1995). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CDFG 1111 Koopman, Hilda (2000). The spec-head configuration. In Koopman, H., The syntax of cdef specifiers and heads. London: Routledge. (2) A node α ASYMMETRICALLY C-COMMANDS β if α c-commands β and β does not The basic proposals: c-command α. X-bar structures (universally) have a strict order: Spec-head-complement. There is no distinction between adjuncts and specifiers. • B asymmetrically c-commands F and G. There can be only one specifier. • E asymmetrically c-commands C and D. • No other non-terminal nodes asymmetrically c-command any others. But wait!—What about SOV languages? What about multiple adjunction? Answer: We’ve been analyzing these things wrong. (3) d(X) is the image of a non-terminal node X. Now, we have lots of work to do, because lots of previous analyses relied on d(X) is the set of terminal nodes dominated by node X. the availability of “head-final” structures, or multiple adjunction. • d(C) is {c}. Why make our lives so difficult? Wasn’t our old system good enough? • d(B) is {c, d}. Actually, no. • d(F) is {e}. A number of things had to be stipulated in X-bar theory (which we will review); • d(E) is {e, f}. they can all be made to follow from one general principle. • d(A) is {c, d, e, f}. The availability of a head-parameter actually fails to predict the kinds of languages that actually exist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistic Review 2019; 36(1): 117–150
    The Linguistic Review 2019; 36(1): 117–150 Sun-Ah Jun* and Xiannu Jiang Differences in prosodic phrasing in marking syntax vs. focus: Data from Yanbian Korean https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2018-2009 Abstract: In studying the effect of syntax and focus on prosodic phrasing, the main issue of investigation has been to explain and predict the location of a prosodic boundary, and not much attention has been given to the nature of prosodic phrasing. In this paper, we offer evidence from intonation patterns of utterances that prosodic phrasing can be formed differently phonologically and phonetically due to its function of marking syntactic structure vs. focus (promi- nence) in Yanbian Korean, a lexical pitch accent dialect of Korean spoken in the northeastern part of China, just above North Korea. We show that the location of a H tone in syntax-marking Accentual Phrase (AP) is determined by the type of syntactic head, noun or verb (a VP is marked by an AP-initial H while an NP is marked by an AP-final H), while prominence-marking accentual phrasing is cued by AP-initial H. The difference in prosodic phrasing due to its dual function in Yanbian Korean is compared with that of Seoul Korean, and a prediction is made on the possibility of finding such difference in other languages based on the prosodic typology proposed in (Jun, Sun-Ah. 2014b. Prosodic typology: by prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. 520–539. Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Thomas Department of Slavic & Eastern Languages
    CURRICULUM VITAE Margaret Thomas Department of Slavic & Eastern Languages & Literatures Boston College 24 Hemlock Road Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 Newton, MA 02464 (617) 552-3697 (617) 244-3105 [email protected] Education Ph.D. 1991 Harvard University Linguistics A.M. 1985 Harvard University Linguistics M.Ed. 1983 Boston University Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages B.A. 1974 Yale University Japanese Language and Literature Employment 2006– Professor, Slavic and Eastern Languages and Literatures, Boston College 1996–06 Associate Professor, Slavic and Eastern Languages Department, Boston College 1992–96 Assistant Professor, Slavic and Eastern Languages Department, Boston College 1991–92 Visiting Assistant Professor, Slavic and Eastern Languages, Boston College 1986–90 Teaching Fellow, Linguistics Department, Harvard University Publications 2013 ‘Air writing’ and second language learners’ knowledge of Japanese kanji. Japanese Language and Literature, 47: 59–92. Otto Jespersen and ‘The Woman’, then and now. Historiographia Linguistica, 40: 377–208. The doctorate in second language acquisition: An institutional history. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3: 509–531. History of the study of second language acquisition. In Martha Young-Scholten and Julia Herschensohn (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 26–45. Cambridge University Press.. 2011 Fifty Key Thinkers on Language and Linguistics, pp. xvii + 306. Routledge Press. Gender and the language scholarship of the Summer Institute of Linguistics in the context of mid twentieth-century American linguistics. In Gerda Hassler (Ed.), History of Linguistics 2008: Selected Papers from the XI International Conference on the History of the Language Margaret Thomas 2 Sciences (ICHOLS XI), Potsdam, 28 August–2 September 2008, 389–397.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Minimalism Minimalism Is the Name of the Predominant Approach In
    Minimalism Minimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first introduced by Chomsky in his work The Minimalist Program (1995) and has seen several developments and changes since. The central idea of minimalism is that a linguistic theory should contain as few non-derived assumptions as possible. Many notions that had been developed in earlier generative theory, specifically the Government & Binding theory (GB), have been abandoned, in an attempt to derive them from more basic concepts. In Chomsky's (1995) view, minimalism is an implementation of the more general Principles and Parameters model. According to this language model, the human language capacity consists of a set of universal principles combined with a set of parameters. The principles are thought to be innate, which means that every language adheres to them. The parameters can be thought of as switches that can be set in two positions. Learning the syntax of one's native language, according to Chomsky's view, is a matter of acquiring the correct parameter settings for the language. Chomsky describes syntax as a cognitive system that connects two other cognitive systems: the conceptual-intentional system and the articulatory-perceptual system. Because syntax is linked to these two systems, the syntactic model defines two interface levels, one for each of them: Phonological Form (PF) is the interface to the articulatory-perceptual system, and Logical Form (LF) is the interface to the conceptual-intentional system. The grammar model is built up as follows: a clause is derived by selecting a set of lexical items from the lexicon.
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Verb Constructions: Argument Structural Uniformity and Event Structural Diversity
    SERIAL VERB CONSTRUCTIONS: ARGUMENT STRUCTURAL UNIFORMITY AND EVENT STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Melanie Owens November 2011 © 2011 by Melanie Rachel Owens. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/db406jt2949 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Beth Levin, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Joan Bresnan I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Vera Gribanov Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii Abstract Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs) are constructions which contain two or more verbs yet behave in every grammatical respect as if they contain only one.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 11: Introduction to Pragmatics. Formal Semantics and Formal Pragmatics
    Formal Semantics and Semantic Universals, Lecture 11 Barbara H. Partee, RGGU, April 28, 2011 Lecture 11: Introduction to Pragmatics. Formal Semantics and Formal Pragmatics. Possible Pragmatic Universals 0. Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics. ....................................................................................................................................1 1. Grice’s Conversational Implicatures. ...........................................................................................................................2 1.1. Motivation. Questions about the meanings of logical words.................................................................................2 1.2. Truth-conditional content (semantics) vs. Conversational Implicatures (pragmatics)..........................................2 1.3. Conversational maxims. (“Gricean maxims”.)......................................................................................................3 1.4. Generating implicatures. General principles. Examples......................................................................................4 1.5. Are Gricean implicatures universal?......................................................................................................................5 2. How a better understanding of conversational implicatures helps semantics. .............................................................5 3. At the borderline of semantics and pragmatics: presuppositions. ................................................................................6 3.1
    [Show full text]
  • RUTH KRAMER Department of Linguistics Office
    RUTH KRAMER Department of Linguistics Office: Poulton 247 Georgetown University [email protected] Washington, DC 20057 Phone: 202-687-5753 EMPLOYMENT 2009- Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University 2012- Associate Director for Afroasiatic Languages, The Afranaph Project (PI: Ken Safir), Rutgers University. 2011- Adjunct Researcher, Center for the Advanced Study of Language, University of Maryland, College Park. EDUCATION 2003-2009 University of California, Santa Cruz Ph.D. in Linguistics, 2009 Dissertation: Definite Markers, Phi Features and Agreement: A Morphosyntactic Investigation of the Amharic DP Committee: Sandra Chung, Jorge Hankamer (co-chairs), James McCloskey 2007 Summer Cooperative African Language Institute (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign). Intensive course in Elementary Amharic. 1999-2003 Brown University, B.A. in Linguistics (Honors) and Egyptology Magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa Thesis: (Virtual) Relative Clauses in Middle Egyptian Advisors: Pauline Jacobson and Leo Depuydt PUBLICATIONS MONOGRAPH AND EDITED VOLUMES Zsiga, Elizabeth, One Boyer and Ruth Kramer, eds. In press. Languages in Africa: Multilingualism, Language Policy, and Education. Georgetown University Press. Kramer, Ruth. Under contract. The Morphosyntax of Gender: Evidence from Amharic. Oxford University Press. Kramer, Ruth, Elizabeth Zsiga and One Boyer, eds. Under contract. Selected Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of African Linguistics. Cascadilla Press. Page 1 of 8 RUTH KRAMER : C.V. REFEREED ARTICLES, BOOK CHAPTERS AND PROCEEDINGS PAPERS Kramer, Ruth. In press. The position of numerals in Middle Egyptian: Evidence from universals of word order. Lingua Aegyptia. Chacón, Dustin, Jen Johnson, Ruth Kramer, Chris LaTerza, Morgan Rood. To appear. New puzzles for shifting indexicals: an Amharic case study. In Selected Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference on African Linguistics (ACAL 44), eds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Asymmetry and Antisymmetry of Syntax¹ a Relational Approach to Displacement
    The Asymmetry and Antisymmetry of Syntax¹ A Relational Approach to Displacement Justin Malčić 2019 Part IIB Dissertation Linguistics Tripos University of Cambridge 9,963 words ¹Special thanks go to Theresa Biberauer for her invaluable comments and support while supervising this dissertation. Any remaining errors are my own. Abstract In both syntax and phonology, it has long been observed that significant restrictions exist on displacement. One such restriction ensures that displacement leads to sequences of elements which are in some sense contiguous, formalised in syntax in the concept of Feature Geometry-based Relativised Minimality by Starke (2001) and Contiguous Agree by Nevins (2007), and in Autosegmental Phonology by the Line-Crossing Prohibition (originating in the Well-formedness Condition in Goldsmith 1976). I argue that effects of this type, which have been called Contiguity Effects, are best captured by taking displacement to involve total weak orders of elements in the sense of Order Theory. Building on work taking the LCA to hold throughout the derivation, I argue that precedence relations may be the basis of phrase structure, though without claiming that linearisation is necessary for LF (as for example suggested in Kayne 2013). I then develop this approach to show that Order Theory provides useful axioms for both phrase structure and displacement, and that the existence of displacement is expected given the use of Order Theory. 2 The extent of ‘antisymmetry’ in syntax has been a major issue for phrase structure theories ever since Kayne’s (1994) original proposal for the Linear Correspondence Axiom. The requirement for antisymmetry in linearisation seems to follow from the nature of the phonological component, which seems to show a different kind of recursion to that displayed in syntax.
    [Show full text]