The London School of Economics and Political Science Narrating Boom

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The London School of Economics and Political Science Narrating Boom The London School of Economics and Political Science Narrating boom and bust: The life-cycle of ideas and narrative in New Labour’s political economy, 1997-2010 Kate Alexander Shaw A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics and Political Science, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, March 2018 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 94,893 words. 2 Acknowledgements This research has been generously supported by the Economic and Social Research Council, grant no. ES/J00070/1. My sincere thanks to the ESRC and to the LSE’s Doctoral Training Centre. I am inordinately grateful to Jonathan Hopkin for being the calmest and most collaborative doctoral supervisor one could wish for. His feedback has been unfailingly constructive and well-judged, and his mentorship of this early part of my career has been generous spirited throughout. I hope my subsequent career will follow his example. I am likewise grateful to Mark Blyth for his early vote of confidence in the project, for his characteristically robust feedback, and for extending me the opportunity to spend time at the Watson Institute at Brown University in 2013. My time in Providence was a pivotal moment for the research and everything that academic life should be. Thanks are also due to David Woodruff for his excellent suggestions at various points in the research, to Ed Page for his advice on elite interviewing and to Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey for hers on content analysis. Tony Travers’ British Government @ LSE research group was an invaluable network in opening up the empirical part of the research, with particular thanks due to Martin Rogers for organising the many Britgov events that were a highlight of my time at the LSE. Further afield, Colin Hay and Tony Payne’s conference programme at SPERI provided wonderful opportunities for an early-career researcher to test new thinking in a supportive but intellectually lively environment. Finally, of course, thanks go to Jeremy. Seven years is a long time and doctoral research is a selfish business. His incredible support has allowed me to pursue a very large dream. This thesis is dedicated to him, and to our girls. 3 Abstract This research contributes to the growing subfield of ideational political economy, by developing a theory of narrative in economic policymaking. Economic policymakers operate under conditions of perpetual uncertainty, but must achieve and project certitude in order to support confidence, and as a basis for policy. This dilemma is principally resolved through the construction of economic narratives: causal stories that mobilise a set of economic ideas in order to define the economy, its relationship to policy, and its expected future trajectory. Such narratives should be understood as social constructions, not as projections of, or diversions from, the material facts. However they are vulnerable to events that fall outside their account of the economy, a vulnerability which tends to increase with time. Constructivist political economy has historically been oriented more to the explanation of change than continuity. The resilience of neoliberal policy frameworks through the crisis of 2008 has therefore posed challenges for a subfield that has tended to treat ideas and discourse as a source of creative political agency, and a counterweight to the conservatism of interests and institutions. The thesis presents a case study of the New Labour government of the UK (1997-2010) in which ideas and narrative are shown to be largely change- resistant, generating political, and to some extent policy, continuity through crisis. The case study disaggregates two properties of economic policy narratives: internal validity, which is concerned with consistency and coherence, and external validity, which relates to the perceived external conditions. By tracing the evolution of the two validities across the lifetime of an economic narrative, we see that rhetorics which begin as the expression of political agency evolve, over time, into structural conditions that impose powerful cognitive and ideological constraints on their narrators. A theory of the life-cycle of economic policy narratives is proposed, comprised of four evolutionary phases: construction, reinforcement, crisis and fragmentation. 4 Contents Page PART I: Theorising Narrative In Political Economy 1 Introduction: Materialist and constructivist 10 approaches to economic policy narratives 2 Theory and literature: Making sense of ideas and 28 discourse in economic policy 3 Research design: Operationalising the study of ideas 55 and narrative PART II: New Labour’s Economic Narrative, 1997-2010 4 Constructing the great moderation: Narratives of 77 stability and prudence, 1997-2007 5 Embracing the market: Narratives of globalisation 120 and financial capitalism, 1997-2007 6 Crisis, Part I: Content analysis of New Labour’s 161 resilient neoliberalism, 2007-2010 7 Crisis, Part II: Narrative continuity and policy change 192 in the financial crisis, 2007-2010 PART III: Conclusions 8 Conclusions: Ideas, confirmation bias and the 241 resilience of fragile narratives PART IV: Methodology M1 Content analysis and interview methodologies 273 Bibliography 307 Index of speeches cited in the text 320 5 List of tables and figures Page Table 1.1 Two materialist accounts of Labour’s stability 18 narrative Table 3.1 Competing explanations of New Labour non- 62 change after crisis Figure 3.2 Three levels of political language 65 Table 4.1 Stability and Prudence as causal stories 87 Figure 4.2 Annual GDP growth rate, forecast at Budget and 93 outturn, 1997-2006 Figure 4.3 Quarterly GDP growth (%), 1997-2007 93 Figure 4.4 Inflation rate, forecast at Budget and outturn, 96 1997-2006 Figure 4.5 Three measures of inflation, 1997-2007 96 Figure 4.6 House price growth, annual % change, 1997- 97 2007 Figure 4.7 Macrostability rhetoric (frequency) 1997-2007 104 Figure 4.8 Prudence rhetoric (frequency) 1997-2007 104 Figure 4.9 Variants of prudence, by audience 104 Figure 4.10 Current budget surplus, budget forecasts and 105 outturn, % of GDP Figure 4.11 Quarterly average yields on 10 year government 109 securities, 1984-2007 Table 5.1 Globalisation as a causal story 126 Figure 5.2 Globalisation rhetoric (frequency) 1997-2007 131 Figure 5.3 UK growth ranking in G7, 1997-2007 132 Table 5.4 Financial capitalism as a causal story 143 Figure 5.5 Financial sector rhetoric (frequency) 1997-2007 144 Figure 5.6 Subcategories of regulatory rhetoric, 1997-2007 147 Table 6.1 Names for the crisis, Alistair Darling speeches 176 6 Table 6.2 Names for the crisis, Gordon Brown speeches 177 Table 6.3 Naming the crisis as “recession” 178 Figure 6.4 Crisis names, percentage of all descriptors by 180 speech, Darling Figure 6.5 Crisis names, percentage of all descriptors by 180 speech, Brown Figure 6.6 Macrostability rhetoric (frequency) 1997-2009 184 Figure 6.7 Prudence rhetoric (frequency) 1997-2009 184 Figure 6.8 Globalisation rhetoric (frequency) 1997-2009 185 Figure 6.9 Financial sector rhetoric (frequency) 1997-2009 185 Figure 6.10 Subcategories of financial sector rhetoric, 1997- 185 2009 Figure 6.11 Thematic rhetoric in Gordon Brown speeches, 188 crisis corpus Figure 6.12 Thematic rhetoric in Alistair Darling speeches, 188 crisis corpus Figure 7.1 Stability rhetoric (frequency) in Budget 204 statements, 1997-2010 Table 8.1 The narrative life cycle of New Labour’s economic policy 244 Figure M1.1 Four themes coding framework 284 Figure M1.2 Coding framework for prudence and financial 287 regulation sub-codes Figure M1.3 Crisis names coding framework 289 Table M1.4 Speeches included in the Main corpus 301 Table M1.5 Speeches included in the Crisis corpus 305 7 A note on referencing The thesis makes reference to a large volume of primary sources in the form of political speeches. For clarity and greater ease of reference, it has been decided to index these materials separately from the main bibliography, with in-text citations using a set of reference codes rather than the (author, date) format otherwise used. A full index of speeches cited in the text is duly provided after the bibliography. Reference codes are designed to indicate the nature of the speech, and the year in which it was delivered: for example, the 2008 Budget statement becomes (BUD08). The identity of the speaker is generally made clear in the surrounding text. The two exceptions to this rule are: speeches that appear as secondary citations from other texts, and speeches by actors other than the New Labour government. These are cited (author, date) and appear in the bibliography in the usual way. Parliamentary proceedings are referenced in accordance with the advice in Leston-Bandeira, C. & Thompson, L. 2013. Referencing Parliamentary Material: A Guide for Lecturers and Students’, which is produced by the UK Parliament Outreach Service and recommended by the Political Studies Association. For example, House of Commons proceedings are listed by parliamentary session and Hansard column number: HC Deb. 2005-06: 441 col.1494. 8 Part I: Theorising Narrative in Political Economy 9 1. Introduction Materialist and constructivist approaches to economic policy narratives This project is about the politics of economic policy: specifically, about the business of translating economic ideas, and economic events, into a viable political narrative.
Recommended publications
  • Gordon Brown (James Gordonbrown) Julio 07, Primer Ministro
    Gordon Brown (James GordonBrown) julio 07, Primer Ministro Duración del mandato: 27 de Junio de 2007 - de de Nacimiento: Giffnock, concejo de East Renfrewshire, Escocia, 20 de Febrero de 1951 Partido político: Laborista Profesión : Profesor de Historia y periodista ResumenLos diez años de Gobierno de Tony Blair en el Reino Unido tocaron a su fin en junio de 2007 con la entrega del puesto de primer ministro, días después de hacerlo con el liderazgo del Partido Laborista, a Gordon Brown, su poderoso canciller del Exchequer (ministro de Hacienda) desde las triunfales elecciones de 1997 y con quien venía manteniendo una singular relación de amistad y rivalidad. Artífice de una fructífera política económica de tipo social-liberal, aunque con algún acento socialdemócrata, y reacio al euro, en 2006 obligó a un Blair muy desgastado por la guerra de Irak a aceptar la renuncia en su favor en mitad de la tercera legislatura, realizando así una antigua ambición que su baqueteado superior intentó demorar todo cuanto pudo. Brown advoca un neolaborismo progresista y actualizado con "nuevas ideas"y "nuevas prioridades", a la cabeza de las cuales están las inversiones públicas en educación y sanidad.(Texto actualizado hasta julio 2007) http://www.cidob.org 1 of 12 Biografía 1. Estudiante aventajado de Historia y primeras actividades en el Partido Laborista 2. Progresión en los Comunes y coadjutor de Tony Blair 3. Una década como ministro de Hacienda del Reino Unido 4. Ambición sucesoria y presiones al primer ministro 5. Un relevo en el poder acordado con antelación 6. El mandato del premier: entre los embates económicos y los sondeos adversos 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 501 19 November 2009 No. 2 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 19 November 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 127 19 NOVEMBER 2009 Business of the House 128 we at business questions are the flint she sparks off, we House of Commons share in her reflected glory. May we assume that she is now a subscriber to that publication? Thursday 19 November 2009 May we have a statement on the prospects for the Bills in the Queen’s Speech? On Monday, the right hon. and learned Lady claimed that the majority of the Bills The House met at half-past Ten o’clock in the Queen’s Speech would become law before the next election. We have an absolute maximum of 70 sitting PRAYERS days before Dissolution, and we need to set aside time for debates on the pre-Budget report, as well as ensuring that we have time to discuss other issues, such as [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] Afghanistan. Given all that, does the right hon. and learned Lady still stand by her original claim, or will Business of the House she admit that there may be difficulties in fulfilling the Government’s commitments? Given the limited time we 10.33 am have left, recess dates have an added significance, so is the right hon.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Codifying Ethics
    1 2 5 Codifying ethics 3 4 New Labour and the government of 5 6 civil servants 7 8 Edward Barratt 9 10 11 12 13 Introduction 14 In the early months of his Prime Ministership in 2007, Gordon Brown spoke of a 15 new era of government, of restoring trust in government that would lead to 16 democratic renewal, the nurturing of citizenship and effective government 17 (Brown, 2010). Against a background of declining levels of political participa- 18 19 tion and the need to respond to an array of challenges now confronting the 20 nation, from the threat of terrorism to the global economy, the rights and 21 responsibilities of British citizens were now in need of redefinition. Amongst the 22 issues at stake for Brown were the powers of an overpowerful executive, includ- 23 ing those executive powers that compromised the independence, neutrality and 24 impartiality of the Civil Service. Brown spoke of reviving the aims of the Civil 25 Service reformers of the mid-nineteenth century, seemingly intimating new pri- 26 orities beyond the dominant themes of the Blair era: “business like,” “joined up,” 27 “decentralised,” “consumer responsive” and “network and partnership” based 28 administration. There was a need for an Act of Parliament, Brown argued, that 29 would formalize the legal status of the Civil Service and the Civil Service Com- 30 mission and promote the proper conduct of government and the good conscience 31 of public officials. A particular way of governing civil servants was to serve 32 wider governmental objectives, helping to renew politics and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Nostalgia, Progressive Patriotism and Labour's 'English Problem'
    Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour©s ©English problem© Article (Accepted Version) Robinson, Emily (2016) Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem'. Political Studies Review, 14 (3). pp. 378-387. ISSN 1478-9299 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61679/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Author’s Post-Print Copy Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem' Emily Robinson, University of Sussex ABSTRACT ‘Progressive patriots’ have long argued that Englishness can form the basis of a transformative political project, whether based on an historic tradition of resistance to state power or an open and cosmopolitan identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin
    THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND ZIONISM: 1917 - 1947 FRED LENNIS LEPKIN BA., University of British Columbia, 196 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ Fred Lepkin 1986 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1986 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Name : Fred Lennis Lepkin Degree: M. A. Title of thesis: The British Labour Party and Zionism, - Examining Committee: J. I. Little, Chairman Allan B. CudhgK&n, ior Supervisor . 5- - John Spagnolo, ~upervis&y6mmittee Willig Cleveland, Supepiso$y Committee -Lenard J. Cohen, External Examiner, Associate Professor, Political Science Dept.,' Simon Fraser University Date Approved: August 11, 1986 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917 - 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Yougov / the Sunday Times Survey Results
    YouGov / The Sunday Times Survey Results Sample Size: 1011 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 7th - 9th September 2010 1st Preference - September 2010 1st Preference - July 2010 September Choice July Choice Gender Age Diane Andy David Ed Diane Andy David Ed David Ed David Ed Total Ed Balls Ed Balls Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Weighted Sample 1008 106 86 91 354 287 99 45 65 244 209 431 474 320 340 577 432 331 303 374 Unweighted Sample 1011 102 89 97 344 296 93 45 69 239 221 429 485 310 353 654 357 307 317 387 % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 1st Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] David Miliband 38 0001000824 9 79 16 83 0 68 11 36 42 41 39 35 Ed Miliband 31 00001001114 13 11 69 1 62 11 50 31 31 33 28 33 Diane Abbott 11 1000000702 3144164181112131111 Andy Burnham 10 001000029 66 4 6 7 10 10 10 12 7 8 10 11 Ed Balls 9 0100000852 10 5 6 5 12 7 11 10 8 5 13 10 Weighted Sample 846 92 82 84 320 268 84 41 55 214 186 384 427 279 296 493 353 280 258 308 Unweighted Sample 849 90 85 89 308 277 80 41 58 207 199 380 438 268 309 555 294 260 266 323 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 2nd Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] Ed Miliband 30 53 48 34 43 0 42 32 25 33 22 35 27 30 29 29 32 32 33 26 Ed Balls 22 200 2825251936 26 23 21 23 21 24 22 23 21 20 23 23 Andy Burnham 19 14 17 0 21 24 14 18 19 21 18 19 19 19 18 18 20 21 20 16 David Miliband 17 13 20 30 0 35 13 12 24 10 27 13 21 16 20 17 17 15 12 23 Diane Abbott 11 0 15 8 11 16 11 2 7 12 12 9 12 11 11 12 10 12 11 12 Weighted Sample 905 90 74 75 351 285 82 40 56 233 203 431 474 299 319 519 387 303 267 336 Unweighted Sample 914 87 78 84 341 293 79 40 60 228 214 429 485 290 334 592 322 283 280 351 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Miliband preference - September [Excluding definitely wouldn't vote] David Miliband 48 19 28 41 100 1 25 34 37 86 17 100 0 80 17 47 49 48 46 48 Ed Miliband 52 81 72 59 0 99 75 66 63 14 83 0 100 20 83 53 51 52 54 52 1 © 2010 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013
    Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013 Executive Summary Sixteen special advisers have gone on to become Cabinet Ministers. This means that of the 492 special advisers listed in the Constitution Unit database in the period 1979-2010, only 3% entered Cabinet. Seven Conservative party Cabinet members were formerly special advisers. o Four Conservative special advisers went on to become Cabinet Ministers in the 1979-1997 period of Conservative governments. o Three former Conservative special advisers currently sit in the Coalition Cabinet: David Cameron, George Osborne and Jonathan Hill. Eight Labour Cabinet members between 1997-2010 were former special advisers. o Five of the eight former special advisers brought into the Labour Cabinet between 1997-2010 had been special advisers to Tony Blair or Gordon Brown. o Jack Straw entered Cabinet in 1997 having been a special adviser before 1979. One Liberal Democrat Cabinet member, Vince Cable, was previously a special adviser to a Labour minister. The Coalition Cabinet of January 2013 currently has four members who were once special advisers. o Also attending Cabinet meetings is another former special adviser: Oliver Letwin as Minister of State for Policy. There are traditionally 21 or 22 Ministers who sit in Cabinet. Unsurprisingly, the number and proportion of Cabinet Ministers who were previously special advisers generally increases the longer governments go on. The number of Cabinet Ministers who were formerly special advisers was greatest at the end of the Labour administration (1997-2010) when seven of the Cabinet Ministers were former special advisers. The proportion of Cabinet made up of former special advisers was greatest in Gordon Brown’s Cabinet when almost one-third (30.5%) of the Cabinet were former special advisers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Conference Works a Guide for Delegates
    Labour Party Annual Conference 25 – 29 September Brighton 2021 How Conference Works A Guide for Delegates #LAB21 2 2021 A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR OF THE CONFERENCE ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE Dear Colleague On behalf of the Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC), I am delighted to congratulate you on becoming a delegate to Labour Party Conference 2021. Following the postponement of Annual Conference 2020 due to COVID-19 I am pleased that we are able to plan for an in person conference in 2021, the first with our new Leadership team of Keir Starmer MP and Angela Rayner MP. With many attending as a delegate for the first time, the CAC hope that this guide will help you to get the most from Conference. Please keep an eye out for the Delegate survey after conference and tell us what you think about this document, and the whole of the conference experience, and how it might be improved. For first-time delegates, this guide aims to provide an understanding of the structure of debates and the procedures adopted at Annual Conference, and for returning delegates it is an update on changes to how Conference works. I hope that you find it useful. In August, you will receive a number of conference reports by email. These are also available online at https://labour.org.uk/conference/at-conference/reports-for-conference-2021/ and can be requested in hard copy from [email protected]. Accessible versions of the documents are provided to those who have requested them from [email protected]. The Delegates report sets out the draft timetable and lists the business to be discussed along with details of the CLP constitutional amendments up for consideration by Conference this year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Labour League of Youth
    University of Huddersfield Repository Webb, Michelle The rise and fall of the Labour league of youth Original Citation Webb, Michelle (2007) The rise and fall of the Labour league of youth. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/761/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ THE RISE AND FALL OF THE LABOUR LEAGUE OF YOUTH Michelle Webb A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Huddersfield July 2007 The Rise and Fall of the Labour League of Youth Abstract This thesis charts the rise and fall of the Labour Party’s first and most enduring youth organisation, the Labour League of Youth.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Party Leadership Selection in Parliamentary Democracies Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8fs1h45n Author So, Florence Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California University of California Los Angeles Party Leadership Selection in Parliamentary Democracies Adissertationsubmittedinpartialsatisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Florence Grace Hoi Yin So 2012 c Copyright by Florence Grace Hoi Yin So 2012 Abstract of the Dissertation Party Leadership Selection in Parliamentary Democracies by Florence Grace Hoi Yin So Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 Professor Kathleen Bawn, Chair My doctoral dissertation begins with this puzzle: why do large, moderate parties sometimes select leaders who seem to help improve their parties’ electoral performances, but other times choose unpopular leaders with more extreme policy positions, in expense of votes? I argue that leadership selection is dependent on both the electoral institution that a party finds itself in and the intra-party dynamics that constrain the party. Due to a high degree of seat- vote elasticity that is characteristic of majoritarian systems, replacing unpopular leaders is a feasible strategy for opposition parties in these systems to increase their seat shares. In contrast, in proportional systems, due to low seat-vote elasticity, on average opposition parties that replace their leaders su↵er from vote loss. My model of party leadership selection shows that since party members can provide valuable election campaign e↵ort, they can coerce those who select the party leader (the selectorate) into choosing their preferred leader.
    [Show full text]