Architecture for Ruins: How Building New Can Showcase the Old in Barboursville, VA Alison B
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ABSTRACT the Main Feature of a Conventional Terraced Housing Development Is Rows of Rectangular Shaped Houses with the Narrow Fa
MAKING A RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN PASSIVE ARCHITECTURE TERRACED HOUSES DEVELOPMENT Wan Rahmah Mohd Zaki Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Abdul Hadi Nawawi Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Sabarinah Sh Ahmad Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The main feature of a conventional terraced housing development is rows of rectangular shaped houses with the narrow facade as the frontage. Consequently, this limits natural cross ventilation and daylight penetration into the middle of the houses; and cause for unnecessary energy consumption on mechanical cooling and artijicial lighting to make the living spaces comfortable for occupants. Such inconsideration is mainly attributed to the optimum configuration of houses which offers the most economic return desired by the developer. Passive Architecture (PA) design strategies can make terraced houses more conducive for occupants as well as gives reasonable returns to the developer. The idea is demonstrated on a hypothetical double storeys terraced scheme in a 2.5 acre site whereby it is transformed intofour types of PA terraced houses development. The Return on Invesfment of the PA terraced houses is ascertained for two situations, ie., (i) fwed sales price for all types of house; and (ii) added premium to PA terraced houses due to the positive unintended effects such as low density housing, etc. If critical criteria for demand and supply in housing remain constant, it is found that PA terraced housing development offers competitive returns to the developer relative to the returns for conventional terraced housing scheme. Keyworh: Orientation, Indoor Comfort and Operational Energy 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Housing and Energy The recent public awareness on sustainability calls for housing to not only serves as a basic shelter but also to be energy efficient, i.e., designed to make occupants need low operational energy. -
Estimating Parking Utilization in Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Washington, D.C
1 Estimating Parking Utilization in Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Washington, D.C. 2 3 Jonathan Rogers 4 Corresponding Author 5 District Department of Transportation 6 55 M Street SE 7 Washington, DC 20003 8 Tel: 202-671-3022; Fax: 202-671-0617; Email: [email protected] 9 10 Dan Emerine 11 D.C. Office of Planning 12 1100 4th Street SW, Suite E560 13 Washington, DC 20024 14 Tel: 202-442-8812; Fax: 202-442-7638 ; Email: [email protected] 15 16 Peter Haas 17 Center for Neighborhood Technology 18 2125 W. North Ave. 19 Chicago, Il 60647 20 Tel.: 773-269-4034; Fax: 773-278-3840; Email: [email protected] 21 22 David Jackson 23 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 24 4800 Hampden Lane, Suite 800 25 Bethesda, MD 20901 26 Tel: 301-347-9108; Fax: 301-347-0101; Email: [email protected] 27 28 Peter Kauffmann 29 Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. 30 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 600 31 Washington, DC 20036 32 Tel: 202-296-8625; Fax: 202-785-1276; Email: [email protected] 33 34 Rick Rybeck 35 Just Economics, LLC 36 1669 Columbia Rd., NW, Suite 116 37 Washington, DC 20009 38 Tel: 202-439-4176; Fax: 202-265-1288; Email: [email protected] 39 40 Ryan Westrom 41 District Department of Transportation 42 55 M Street SE 43 Washington, DC 20003 44 Tel: 202-671-2041; Fax: 202-671-0617; Email: [email protected] 45 46 Word count: 5,468 words text + 8 tables/figures x 250 words (each) = 7,468 words 1 Submission Date: November 13, 2015 1 ABSTRACT 2 The District Department of Transportation and the District of Columbia Office of Planning 3 recently led a research effort to understand how parking utilization in multi-family residential 4 buildings is related to neighborhood and building characteristics. -
The Presidents of Mount Rushmore
The PReSIDeNTS of MoUNT RUShMoRe A One Act Play By Gloria L. Emmerich CAST: MALE: FEMALE: CODY (student or young adult) TAYLOR (student or young adult) BRYAN (student or young adult) JESSIE (student or young adult) GEORGE WASHINGTON MARTHA JEFFERSON (Thomas’ wife) THOMAS JEFFERSON EDITH ROOSEVELT (Teddy’s wife) ABRAHAM LINCOLN THEODORE “TEDDY” ROOSEVELT PLACE: Mount Rushmore National Memorial Park in Keystone, SD TIME: Modern day Copyright © 2015 by Gloria L. Emmerich Published by Emmerich Publications, Inc., Edenton, NC. No portion of this dramatic work may be reproduced by any means without specific permission in writing from the publisher. ACT I Sc 1: High school students BRYAN, CODY, TAYLOR, and JESSIE have been studying the four presidents of Mount Rushmore in their history class. They decided to take a trip to Keystone, SD to visit the national memorial and see up close the faces of the four most influential presidents in American history. Trying their best to follow the map’s directions, they end up lost…somewhere near the face of Mount Rushmore. All four of them are losing their patience. BRYAN: We passed this same rock a half hour ago! TAYLOR: (Groans.) Remind me again whose idea it was to come here…? CODY: Be quiet, Taylor! You know very well that we ALL agreed to come here this summer. We wanted to learn more about the presidents of Mt. Rushmore. BRYAN: Couldn’t we just Google it…? JESSIE: Knock it off, Bryan. Cody’s right. We all wanted to come here. Reading about a place like this isn’t the same as actually going there. -
Independence Day at Monticello (.Pdf
INDEPENDENCE DAY AT MONTICELLO JULY 2017 “The only birthday I ever commemorate is that of our Independence, the Fourth of July.” - Margaret Bayard Smith quoting Thomas Jefferson, 1801 There is no more inspirational place to celebrate the Fourth of July than Monticello, the home of the author of the Declaration of Independence. Since 1963, more than 3,000 people from every corner of the globe have taken the oath of citizenship at the annual Monticello Independence Day Celebration and Naturalization Ceremony. Jefferson himself hoped that Americans would celebrate the Fourth of July, what he called “the great birthday of our Republic,” to “refresh our collections of [our] rights, and undiminished devotion to them.” The iconic West Lawn of Monticello provides a glorious setting for a ceremony steeped in patriotic elements. “Monticello is a beautiful spot for this, full as it is of the spirit that animated this country’s foundation: boldness, vision, improvisation, practicality, inventiveness and imagination, the kind of cheekiness that only comes from free-thinking and faith in an individual’s ability to change the face of the world — it’s easy to imagine Jefferson saying to himself, “So what if I’ve never designed a building before? If I want to, I will...” - Excerpt from Sam Waterston’s remarks at Monticello, 2007 It is said that we are a nation of immigrants. The list of those who have delivered the July 4th address at Monticello is a thoroughly American story. In 1995 there was Roberto Goizueta, the man who fled Cuba with nothing but an education and a job, and who rose to lead one of the best known corporations: The Coca-Cola Company. -
Mount Rushmore: a Tomb for Dead Ideas of American Greatness in June of 1927, Albert Burnley Bibb, Professor of Architecture at George Washington
Caleb Rollins 1 Mount Rushmore: A Tomb for Dead Ideas of American Greatness In June of 1927, Albert Burnley Bibb, professor of architecture at George Washington University remarked in a plan for The National Church and Shrine of America, “[T]hrough all the long story of man’s mediaeval endeavor, the people have labored at times in bonds of more or less common faith and purpose building great temples of worship to the Lords of their Destiny, great tombs for their noble dead.”1 Bibb and his colleague Charles Mason Remey were advocating for the construction of a national place for American civil religion in Washington, D.C. that would include a place for worship and tombs to bury the great dead of the nation. Perhaps these two gentleman knew that over 1,500 miles away in the Black Hills of South Dakota, a group of intrepid Americans had just begun to make progress on their own construction of a shrine of America, Mount Rushmore. These Americans had gathered together behind a common purpose of building a symbol to the greatness of America, and were essentially participating in the human tradition of construction that Bibb presented. However, it is doubtful that the planners of this memorial knew that their sculpture would become not just a shrine for America, but also like the proposed National Church and Shrine a tomb – a tomb for the specific definitions of American greatness espoused by the crafters of Mt. Rushmore. In 1924 a small group of men initiated the development of the memorial of Mount Rushmore and would not finish this project until October of 1941. -
20.17.000 Building Size and Floor Area Regulations
20.17.000 BUILDING SIZE AND FLOOR AREA REGULATIONS 20.17.010 MINIMUM REQUIRED. Any building intended in whole or part for residential purposes shall provide a minimum floor area, and basement or utility area as hereinafter specified by the regulations for the District in which such building is located. A. The minimum floor requirement for residential use shall be based upon the number of bedrooms, as defined by the Building Code, and total rooms, as defined by the Building Code exclusive of bathrooms, and is stated in terms of the total useable residential floor area required per family on a single floor level. B. In any district which requires minimum floor area for purposes and an attached garage requirement (sic), the district may credit a portion of the garage area toward the required minimum floor area. Carports shall not be so credited nor garages built at a basement level. C. In the case of any residential building which has more than a single floor level, the total of all liveable floor area which is not over any other liveable floor area shall be called the First Floor Area, and shall conform to the required minimum total floor area, except that the required First Floor Area may be reduced, to any further minimum as established and in proportion to an increase in total liveable floor area as set forth in the individual district regulations. 1. The individual district regulations may allow that a percentage of any such increase in total liveable floor area may be unfinished floor space capable under the Building Code or this Ordinance below of being finished to liveable floor area, provided such unfinished area is in the second story of a two story home as defined on the fold-out chart, (see 20.33.000.) In addition to requirements of the Building Code, such space shall meet the following requirements. -
Palladio's Influence in America
Palladio’s Influence In America Calder Loth, Senior Architectural Historian, Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2008 marks the 500th anniversary of Palladio’s birth. We might ask why Americans should consider this to be a cause for celebration. Why should we be concerned about an Italian architect who lived so long ago and far away? As we shall see, however, this architect, whom the average American has never heard of, has had a profound impact on the architectural image of our country, even the city of Baltimore. But before we investigate his influence we should briefly explain what Palladio’s career involved. Palladio, of course, designed many outstanding buildings, but until the twentieth century few Americans ever saw any of Palladio’s works firsthand. From our standpoint, Palladio’s most important achievement was writing about architecture. His seminal publication, I Quattro Libri dell’ Architettura or The Four Books on Architecture, was perhaps the most influential treatise on architecture ever written. Much of the material in that work was the result of Palladio’s extensive study of the ruins of ancient Roman buildings. This effort was part of the Italian Renaissance movement: the rediscovery of the civilization of ancient Rome—its arts, literature, science, and architecture. Palladio was by no means the only architect of his time to undertake such a study and produce a publication about it. Nevertheless, Palladio’s drawings and text were far more engaging, comprehendible, informative, and useful than similar efforts by contemporaries. As with most Renaissance-period architectural treatises, Palladio illustrated and described how to delineate and construct the five orders—the five principal types of ancient columns and their entablatures. -
Albemarle County in Virginia
^^m ITD ^ ^/-^7^ Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.arGhive.org/details/albemarlecountyiOOwood ALBEMARLE COUNTY IN VIIIGIMIA Giving some account of wHat it -was by nature, of \srHat it was made by man, and of some of tbe men wHo made it. By Rev. Edgar Woods " It is a solemn and to\acKing reflection, perpetually recurring. oy tHe -weaKness and insignificance of man, tHat -wKile His generations pass a-way into oblivion, -with all tKeir toils and ambitions, nature Holds on Her unvarying course, and pours out Her streams and rene-ws Her forests -witH undecaying activity, regardless of tHe fate of Her proud and perisHable Sovereign.**—^e/frey. E.NEW YORK .Lie LIBRARY rs526390 Copyright 1901 by Edgar Woods. • -• THE MicHiE Company, Printers, Charlottesville, Va. 1901. PREFACE. An examination of the records of the county for some in- formation, awakened curiosity in regard to its early settle- ment, and gradually led to a more extensive search. The fruits of this labor, it was thought, might be worthy of notice, and productive of pleasure, on a wider scale. There is a strong desire in most men to know who were their forefathers, whence they came, where they lived, and how they were occupied during their earthly sojourn. This desire is natural, apart from the requirements of business, or the promptings of vanity. The same inquisitiveness is felt in regard to places. Who first entered the farms that checker the surrounding landscape, cut down the forests that once covered it, and built the habitations scattered over its bosom? With the young, who are absorbed in the engagements of the present and the hopes of the future, this feeling may not act with much energy ; but as they advance in life, their thoughts turn back with growing persistency to the past, and they begin to start questions which perhaps there is no means of answering. -
19 Building a House
Building a House 19 19.1 Homes for People 19.2 House Construction Identify diff erent residential dwellings. • Explain the diff erences between manufactured houses and site-built houses. Describe how a building site is chosen. Explain how a house is assembled. Explore the Photo Building Homes and Lives Habitat for Humanity enables people of all ages to help families build their own home. Why is this man working safely? 402 Unit 6 Construction Technologies Build a Model House At the end of the chapter, you will be asked to design and build a model of a house. Get a head start by using this checklist to prepare for the Technology Lab. PROJECT CHECKLIST ✓ Do research on the Internet or go to a local hobby store to fi nd examples of miniature model houses. ✓ Begin to collect materials you will need to do the project, such as marking pens, white glue, and wax paper. ✓ Ask your teacher to review the safety reminder for this lab. 403 Bill Frymire/Masterfi le 19.1 Homes for People Connect What are Graphic Organizer some diff erent types of homes? Draw the section diagram. Use it to organize Content Vocabulary and write down information as you read. residential building Advantages of Prefabriated Houses building site 1. ______________________________________Requires less labor Academic Vocabulary 2. ______________________________________ You will see these words in your reading and on 3. ______________________________________ your tests. Find their meanings at the back of 4. ______________________________________ this book. community Go to glencoe.com to this book’s OLC for a associate downloadable graphic organizer and more. -
2013 Medal Winners
Winery Varietal Description Medal Altavista Vineyards Shiraz Bronze Altillo Vineyards Cabernet Franc Bronze Altillo Vineyards Chardonnay Silver AmRhein Wine Cellars Pinot Grigio no medal AmRhein Wine Cellars Chambourcin Silver AmRhein Wine Cellars Vidal Blanc Silver AmRhein Wine Cellars Pinot Gris Reserve Silver Annefield Vineyards Viognier Bronze Cabernet Franc, Cabernet Bronze Annefield Vineyards Sauvignon, Petit Verdot Red Cabernet Franc, Vidal Silver Annefield Vineyards Blanc Rose Attimo Vidal Blanc Silver Barboursville Vineyards Muscat Ottonel, Vidal Malvaxia Bronze Barboursville Vineyards Meritage Octagon Gold Barboursville Vineyards Muscat Ottonel, Vidal Malvaxia Silver Barboursville Vineyards Petit Verdot Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Petit Verdot Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Merlot Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Meritage Octagon Silver Barboursville Vineyards Nebbiolo Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Nebbiolo Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Cabernet Franc Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Cabernet Franc Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Cabernet Franc Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve Silver Barboursville Vineyards Viognier Reserve Silver Barrel Oak Winery Cabernet Franc Reserve Bronze Barrel Oak Winery Petit Manseng Reserve Bronze Barrel Oak Winery Cabernet Sauvignon Silver Barrel Oak Winery Chardonnay Reserve Silver Barren Ridge Vineyards Meritage Bronze Barren Ridge Vineyards Vidal Blanc Estate Bottled Bronze Barren Ridge Vineyards Viognier Estate -
Fond Du Lac Treaty Portraits: 1826
Fond du Lac Treaty Portraits: 1826 RICHARD E. NELSON Duluth, Minnesota The story of the Fond du Lac Treaty portraits began on the St. Louis River at a site near the present city of Duluth with these words: Whereas a treaty between the United States of America and the Chippeway tribe of Indians, was made and concluded on the fifth day of August, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-six, at the Fond du Lac of Lake Superior, in the territory of Michigan, by Commissioners on the part of the United States, and certain Chiefs and Warriors of the said tribe . (McKenney 1959:479) The location was memorialized by a monument erected by the Daughters of the American Revolution, Duluth, Minnesota, on November 21, 1922, which reads: Fond du Lac, Minnesota. Site of an Ojibway village from the earliest known pe riod. Daniel Greysolon Sieur de Lhut was here in 1679. Astor's American Fur Company established a trading post on this spot about 1817. First Ojibway treaty in Minnesota made here in 1826. The report of the treaty is recorded in Sketches of a Tour to the Lakes, of the Character and Customs of the Chippeway Indians, and of Incidents Connected with the Treaty of Fond du Lac written by Thomas K. McKenney in the form of letters to Secretary of War James Barbour in Washington and first published in 1827. McKenney was the head of the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs. In May of 1826 he and Lewis Cass, the governor of the Michigan Territory, were appointed by President John Quincy Adams to conclude a major treaty at Fond du Lac. -
Wine by the Bottle
Champagne and Sparkling Glass Bottle Zardetto Prosecco, Italy NV $10 $35 Nicolas Feuillatte Chouilly, France NV $14 $65 White Wine Barboursville Vineyards Chardonnay, VA $9 $35 Santa Christina Pinot Grigio, Italy $9 $35 Charles Smith Kung Fu Girl Riesling, WA $8 $31 Trefethen Chardonnay Napa, CA $15 $59 Red Wines Barboursville, Cabernet Sauvignon, VA $9 $35 Shooting Star Pinot Noir, Lake County, CA $9 $35 Beran Vineyards Zinfandel, CA $9 $35 L’Ecole #41 Merlot, Columbia Valley, WA $16 $64 WINE BY THE BOTTLE Chardonnay Rombauer Vineyards, Napa Valley Carneros 2015 $64 Chateau Montelena, Calistoga Napa Valley 2014 $78 Jefferson Reserve Monticelo 2015 $48 Stag’s Leap Karia Napa Valley 2015 $54 Sauvignon Blanc Frog’s Leap Napa Valley 2015 $48 Stag’s Leap Napa Valley 2015 $54 Other Whites Conundrum Rutherford Valley 2015 $40 DuCard Viogier Ethan 2017 $55 Cabernet Sauvignon Chateau Montelena, Calistoga 2014 $95 Elizabeth Spencer Special Cuvee Napa Valley 2013 $85 Delfosse Monticello 2014 $58 Darioush Napa Valley 2013 $150 Pinot Noir Belle Glos Clarke & Telephone Santa Maria Valley $95 Chalk Hill Winery Estate Bottled Russian River 2013 $75 Merlot Northstar Columbia Valley 2014 $75 Bluestone Vineyard Bridgewater 2012 $45 Other Reds Jefferson Vineyards Meritage Monticello 2014 $65 Michael Shaps Cabernet Franc 2014 $55 Raumbaur Zinfandel, Napa Valley 2013 $80 Beaulieu Vineyards Tapestry Napa Valley 2013 $75 The Pundit Syrah Columbia Valley 2014 $60 DRAFT BEER 16oz 20oz Boars Head Lager $6 $7 Vienna-Style Lager ABV 4.6% Star Hill Snow Blind $6