DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2019 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Prepared on Behalf of the Municipalities of the MetroCOG Region Draft to DEMHS: May 13, 2019 Draft to FEMA: July 2, 2019 Approved Pending Adoption: July 12, 2019 Adopted: July 18, 2019 FEMA Approval: ________, 2019 Acknowledgements MetroCOG thanks its member communities for their participation in this Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. The time and dedication shown by local staff in advancing natural hazard mitigation efforts is significant and has helped create a more resilient region. MetroCOG also thanks the local boards, commissions, and general public who provided valuable insight into their communities. Project Staff for Plan Update MetroCOG 1000 Lafayette Boulevard Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604 203-366-5405 info *at* ctmetro.org Matt Fulda Patrick Carleton Meghan Sloan Executive Director Deputy Director Planning Director 203-366-5405 x28 203-366-5405 x26 203-366-5405 x23 mfulda *at* ctmetro.org pcarleton *at* ctmetro.org msloan *at* ctmetro.org Municipal Contacts / Local Coordinators City of Bridgeport Town of Easton Town of Fairfield Lynn Haig, AICP Captain Richard Doyle Emmeline Harrigan, AICP, CFM Director of Planning, Office of Emergency Management Director Assistant Planning Director Planning & Economic Development 225 Center Road Plan & Zoning Department 999 Broad Street Easton, CT 06612 725 Old Post Road Bridgeport, CT 06604 203-268-4111 Fairfield, CT 06824 203-576-7221 rdoyle *at* eastonct.gov 203-256-3050 lynn.haig *at* bridgeportct.gov eharrigan *at* fairfieldct.org Town of Monroe Town of Stratford Town of Trumbull Chris Nowacki Jay Habansky, AICP William Maurer, P.E., LS Director of Public Works Planning & Zoning Administrator Town Engineer 7 Fan Hill Road 2725 Main Street, Rooms 113 & 118 5866 Main Street Monroe, CT 06468 Stratford, CT 06615 Trumbull, CT 06611 203-452-2814 203-385-4017 203-452-5050 cnowacki *at* monroect.org jhabansky *at* townofstratford.com wmaurer *at* trumbull-ct.gov -and- -and- Scott Schatzlein, P.E. Susmitha Attota, AICP Town Engineer Town Planner 203-452-2809 (203) 385-4017 sschatzlein *at* monroect.org sattota *at* townofstratford.com Consultant Team Milone & MacBroom, Inc. The Nature Conservancy David Murphy, P.E., CFM, Associate Adam Whelchel, Ph.D. Manager of Water Resources Planning Director of Science 99 Realty Drive 55 Church Street, Third Floor Cheshire, CT 06410 New Haven, CT 06510 203-271-1773 x295 203-568-6270 dmurphy *at* mminc.com awhelchel *at* tnc.org Notice to Readers This document was prepared under a grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Points of view or opin- ions expressed in this document are those of MetroCOG and its member communities and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. CONTENTS 1. Purpose & Regional Overview 1.1 Authority | 1-1 1.2 Background | 1-2 1.3 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan | 1-3 1.4 Profile of the MetroCOG Region & Jurisdictions | 1-3 1.5 Land Use | 1-13 1.6 Development Trends | 1-14 2. Planning Process 2.1 Review of Existing Plans | 2-1 2.2 Review of Municipal Websites | 2-8 2.3 Government Structure |2-10 2.4 Planning Teams | 2-15 2.5 Conservation Technical Advisory Committee | 2-17 2.6 Hazard Mitigation Workshops | 2-17 2.7 Community Outreach | 2-25 3. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment 3.1 General Description of Region | 3-1 3.2 Natural Hazards | 3-13 3.3 Loss Estimates | 3-18 3.4 Hazard Profile – Hurricanes and Tropical Storms | 3-19 3.5 Hazard Profile – Inland Flooding | 3-29 3.6 Hazard Profile – Coastal Flooding | 3-40 3.7 Hazard Profile – Sea Level Rise | 3-45 3.8 Hazard Profile – Winter Storms | 3-48 3.9 Hazard Profile – Summer Storms and Tornadoes | 3-52 3.10 Hazard Profile – Earthquakes | 3-58 3.11 Hazard Profile - Dam Failure | 3-61 3.12 Hazard Profile - Wildfires | 3-66 3.13 Hazard Summary | 3-68 4. Mitigation Strategies 4.1 Problem Statements | 4-1 4.2 Vision, Goals & Objectives | 4-13 4.3 Development of Hazard Mitigation Strategies | 4-15 4.4 Regional Actions | 4-19 4.5 Review of Prior Hazard Mitigation Actions | 4-23 5. Implementation 5.1 Adoption & Responsibilities for Implementation | 5-1 5.2 Planning Mechanisms | 5-2 5.3 Progress Monitoring, Public Participation and Plan Maintenance | 5-2 5.4 Community Rating System Program | 5-2 5.5 Mitigation Actions for Each Community | 5-4 5.6 Implementation Capabilities | 5-6 5.7 Technical & Financial Resources | 5-29 Purpose & 1 Regional Overview The purpose of the multi-jurisdic- tional update to the Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (NHMP) is to reduce the loss of life, personal injury and damage to property, infrastructure and natural, cultural and economic resources from a natural disaster in the Greater Bridgeport Region. The The components of the Plan include: Plan emphasizes actions that can • Identification of natural hazards that could occur be implemented now to reduce or in the region – inland flooding, coastal flooding, prevent damage from a future natu- hurricanes, sea level rise, summer storms, winter ral disaster. The assessments and storms (ice and blizzards), tornadoes, earthquakes, evaluations are based on extensive wildfires, and dam failure; • Evaluation of vulnerabilities to structures and data collection and outreach efforts populations; to obtain information on the physical • Assessment of current mitigation measures in- setting of the region, existing haz- cluded in the 2014 NHMP to determine which have ards, and the occurrence, frequency, been implemented and whether or not they have duration and potency of probable been effective in reducing vulnerabilities and risks; • Identification and evaluation of potential miti- hazards. gation measures that could be implemented to reduce risks and vulnerability; • Development of response strategies to address hazard mitigation; and • Recommendations for future mitigation actions. 1.1 Authority The Plan is authorized under the federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA), also known as the 2000 Stafford Act amendments. The purposes of the DMA are to establish a national program for pre-disaster mitiga- tion and streamline administration of disaster relief. The Act encourages the develop- ment of disaster preparedness and mitigation plans and the implementa- tion of measures to reduce the effects of natural hazards. Under DMA, communities are required to develop and submit a Natu- ral Hazard Mitigation Plan as a condition of eligibility for certain funding opportunities offered by the Federal Emergency Manage- ment Agency (FEMA), including the Pre-Disas- 1-1 ter Mitigation (PDM) Program and post-disaster the significant coastal flooding of October Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). and November 2018. • The plan incorporates a new exposure analysis that tabulates parcels and structures 1.2 Background exposed to the risks profiled in the plan. This plan update builds on the 2014 Update • The plan adds “Fact Sheets” to make the to the original 2006 NHMP for the former Greater document livelier and give community plan- Bridgeport Regional Planning Area, developed in ners the flexibility to pull stand-alone pages cooperation with the City of Bridgeport and the out of the plan document when pursuing Towns of Easton, Fairfield, Monroe and Trumbull. specific projects, grants, etc.: The consulting firm of Milone & MacBroom, Inc. » Regional Challenges: Intense Precipitation was hired to provide technical assistance and con- » Regional Challenges: Sea Level Rise duct required vulnerability and risk assessments. » Regional Challenges: Coastal Flooding The NHMP for the former Greater Bridgeport area » Regional Challenges: Repetitive Loss was adopted and approved by FEMA in January Properties 2007. Subsequent to its adoption, the Plan was » New Initiative: Regional Framework for amended to include the NHMP for the Town of Coastal Resilience Stratford (Annex, 2008). » New Initiative: Resilient Bridgeport » New Initiative: Connecticut State Collages FEMA requires that all local and multi-jurisdic- and Universities Hazard Mitigation Plan tional (regional) plans be updated every five years » New Initiative: Hazardous Spills at Busi- to remain valid. The original NHMP for the Greater nesses Bridgeport Region expired on January 29, 2012. » New Initiative: Risks to Historic Resources A NHMP Update was prepared by the Greater » New Initiative: Municipal Separate Storm- Bridgeport Regional Council and was approved by water System (MS4) FEMA on July 22, 2014 with an expiration date of » New Initiative: Low Impact Development July 2019. Since the time the NHMP Update was (LID) for Rural Resiliency adopted, the Greater Bridgeport Regional Council » New Initiative: Sustainable CT has been renamed the Connecticut Metropolitan » Mitigation Successes: Property Acquisi- Council of Governments (MetroCOG), with the tions in Trumbull composition of member municipalities unchanged. » Mitigation Successes: Microgrids » Mitigation Successes: Fairfield Green Changes to Planning Process and NHMP Infrastructure Document • The plan describes new Community Resil- ience Building (CRB) workshops conducted Numerous modifications were incorporated for five of the six communities. The Work- into the update of the NHMP. The following is a shops included Chief Elected Officials, list of the key changes. Each is addressed in the Board/Commission members, municipal staff appropriate section of the document. and other local and regional stakeholders. • The current version of HAZUS-MH was • With the completion of new CRB workshops,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Implementation Plan for Sustainable Development in the New York - Connecticut Metropolitan Region
    Implementation Plan for Sustainable Development in the New York - Connecticut Metropolitan Region MAY 30, 2014 DRAFT: June 2, 2014 - 13:33 SCI Implementation Plan Draft 20140602_final.indd 1 About the New York-Connecticut Sustainable Communities Consortium NY-CT Sustainable Communities Consortium The New York – Connecticut Sustainable Communities Consortium is supported by a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities Regional Planning Grant. The Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant program is a key initiative of the Partnership for Sustainable Communities, a federal partnership joining the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Transportation, and HUD with a shared mission to coordinate federal housing, transportation, water, and other infrastructure investments to make neighborhoods more prosperous, allow people to live closer to jobs, save households time and money, and reduce pollution . Partners in the NY-CT Sustainable Communities Consortium An Advisory Board was formed to monitor the progress of include cities, counties, metropolitan planning organizations, Consortium activities, provide recommendations, and review and non-profit organizations across Long Island, New York City, and comment on Consortium work programs. Advisory lower Hudson Valley, and coastal Connecticut: Board members include both governmental agencies and non- governmental organizations in the tri-state New York/New Regional Plan Association, partner and fiduciary agent Jersey/Connecticut
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Environmental Protection Inland Waters And
    Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies TITLE 26. Fisheries & Game Agency Department of Environmental Protection Subject Inland Waters and Marine District Defined Section § 26-108-1 CONTENTS Sec. 26-108-1. Inland waters and marine district defined Revised: 2015-3-6 R.C.S.A. § 26-108-1 - I- Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies TITLE 26. Fisheries & Game Department of Environmental Protection §26-108-1 Inland Waters and Marine District Defined Sec. 26-108-1. Inland waters and marine district defined The following lines across streams flowing into Long Island Sound, Fisher’s Island Sound, Little Narragansett Bay and tributaries thereof shall be known as the inland-marine demarcation lines above which lines such water shall be known as the “inland district” and below which lines such water shall be known as the “marine district”: FAIRFIELD COUNTY Byram River, Greenwich marine district—up to and including the railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Horse Neck Brook, Greenwich marine district—none inland district—above junction with mouth of harbor Indian Harbor, Greenwich marine district—up to and including the first railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Mianus River, Greenwich marine district—below dam just above Boston Post Road inland district—all waters above Rippowam River, Stamford marine district—up to and including the first railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Noroton River, Stamford-Darien marine district—up to and including Boston Post Road inland district—all waters above Goodwives River,
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Strea
    Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Streambed Sediment in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins, 1992-94 By Robert F. Breault and Sandra L. Harris Abstract exceed sediment-quality guidelines over a wider geographical area, although usually by lower Streambed-sediment samples were collected ratios of contaminant concentration to sediment- in 1992-94 at selected sites in the Connecticut, quality guideline than the organic compounds. Housatonic, and Thames River Basins to determine the geographical distribution of trace elements and organic compounds and their INTRODUCTION potential for adverse biological effects on aquatic organisms. Chromium, copper, lead, mercury, The Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins study unit is one of 59 National Water-Quality nickel, zinc, chlordane, DDT, PAHs, and PCBs Assessment (NAWQA) study units nationwide. The were detected in samples from throughout the study unit drainage basin comprises an area of almost basins, but concentrations of these constituents 16,000 mi2 and extends through parts of the Province of generally were lowest in the northern forested Quebec, Canada, eastern Vermont, western New Hamp- drainage basins and highest in the southern shire, west-central Massachusetts, nearly all of Connect- urbanized drainage basins of Springfield, icut, and small parts of New York and Rhode Island. Massachusetts, and Hartford, New Haven and The study unit is entirely within the New Bridgeport, Connecticut. Possible anthropogenic England Physiographic Province (Fenneman, 1938), a sources of these contaminants include industrial plateau-like upland that rises gradually from the sea but effluent; municipal wastewater; runoff from includes numerous mountain ranges and individual agricultural, urban and forested areas; and peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
    [Show full text]
  • 271 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 5
    Case 20-13076-BLS Doc 271 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------------ x : In re: : Chapter 11 : FRANCESCA’S HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Case No. 20-13076 (BLS) 1 : et al., : : Debtors. Jointly Administered : : Re: D.I. 45, 266 ------------------------------------------------------------ x NOTICE OF POTENTIAL ASSUMPTION AND ASSIGNMENT OF EXECUTORY CONTRACTS OR UNEXPIRED LEASES AND CURE AMOUNTS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT: 1. The above-captioned debtors (collectively, the “Debtors”) each filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”) on December 3, 2020. 2. On December 4, 2020, the Debtors filed the Motion of Debtors for Entry of Orders (I)(A) Approving Bidding Procedures for Sale of Substantially All of the Debtors’ Assets, (B) Approving Process for Designation of Stalking Horse Bidder and Provision of Bid Protections, (C) Scheduling Auction for, and Hearing to Approve, Sale of Substantially All of the Debtors’ Assets, (D) Approving Form and Manner of Notices of Sale, Auction and Sale Hearing, (E) Approving Assumption and Assignment Procedures and (F) Granting Related Relief and (II)(A) Approving Sale of Substantially All of the Debtors’ Assets Free and Clear of All Liens, Claims, Interests and Encumbrances, (B) Approving Assumption and Assignment of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery
    Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Basic Information Title: Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Project Number: 2010CT208B Start Date: 3/1/2010 End Date: 2/28/2011 Funding Source: 104B Congressional District: District 2 Research Category: Water Quality Focus Category: Water Quality, Surface Water, None Descriptors: None Principal Investigators: Daniel Civco, James D Hurd Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery1 Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Progress Report May 2011 Daniel Civco – Principal Investigator James Hurd – Co-Investigator Center for Landuse Education and Research (CLEAR) Department of Natural Resources and the Environment The University of Connecticut 1376 Storrs Road Storrs, CT 06269-4087 (p) 860-486-4610, (f) 860-486-5408 [email protected] [email protected] RESEARCH PROBLEM Connecticut has over 1,000 lakes and ponds larger than 5 acres in area. These water bodies provide important recreational opportunities, aesthetic values, and ecosystem services that contribute to the quality of life, environment, and economy of the state. Over the past 400 years, Connecticut has undergone significant alterations to its landscape. As a result of these mostly anthropogenic activities, including clearing of forests, agriculture, and urban and rural development, there have been significant impacts to the water quality of Connecticut’s lakes and ponds. While a natural process, the eutrophication of lakes caused by excess nutrient export in runoff has been, and continues to be, a pervasive problem (Siver et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Watch | 2016
    Harbor Watch | 2016 Fairfield County River Report: 2016 Sarah C. Crosby Nicole L. Cantatore Joshua R. Cooper Peter J. Fraboni Harbor Watch, Earthplace Inc., Westport, CT 06880 This report includes data on: Byram River, Farm Creek, Mianus River, Mill River, Noroton River, Norwalk River, Poplar Plains Brook, Rooster River, Sasco Brook, and Saugatuck River Acknowledgements The authors with to thank Jessica Ganim, Fiona Lunt, Alexandra Morrison, Ken Philipson, Keith Roche, Natalie Smith, and Corrine Vietorisz for their assistance with data collection and laboratory analysis. Funding for this research was generously provided by Jeniam Foundation, Social Venture Partners of Connecticut, Copps Island Oysters, Atlantic Clam Farms, 11th Hour Racing Foundation, City of Norwalk, Coastwise Boatworks, Environmental Professionals’ Organization of Connecticut, Fairfield County’s Community Foundation, General Reinsurance, Hillard Bloom Shellfish, Horizon Foundation, Insight Tutors, King Industries, Long Island Sound Futures Fund, McCance Family Foundation, New Canaan Community Foundation, Newman’s Own Foundation, Norwalk Cove Marina, Norwalk River Watershed Association, NRG – Devon, Palmer’s Market, Pramer Fuel, Resnick Advisors, Rex Marine Center, Soundsurfer Foundation, Town of Fairfield, Town of Ridgefield, Town of Westport, Town of Wilton, Trout Unlimited – Mianus Chapter. Additional support was provided by the generosity of individual donors. This report should be cited as: S.C. Crosby, N.L. Cantatore, J.R. Cooper, and P.J. Fraboni. 2016. Fairfield
    [Show full text]
  • Living in the Elm City a Guide to Getting Around New Haven
    Living in the Elm City A Guide to Getting Around New Haven 1 Welcome to ! Welcome to your new home! There’s so much to do in New Haven that some guidance will go a long way toward making sure you get the most out of the Elm City. The Yale Housing Office has prepared this guide for your own use. Included is a comprehensive list of restaurants, pharmacies, bars, entertainment venues, and even barber shops. This is by no means everything that the Elm City has to offer but rather a selection carefully crafted in order to ensure that you know where to find things as different as Cuban food, coffee and toiletries and local parks. If you want to do your own exploring, this guide provides suggestions of places to start. If you want to explore later, but want to start with something a little more structured, consider taking a campus tour. The Yale Visitor Information Center is located at 149 Elm St., and their number is (203) 432-2300. Their office is open from 9:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. on weekdays and from 11:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. on weekends. Free Campus tours (approximately 1 hour in length) are given Monday through Friday at 10:30 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., and on Saturdays and Sundays at 1:30 p.m. Table of Contents Restaurants . 3-6 Coffee, Sweets & Bakeries . 6-7 Groceries & Household . 7 Pharmacies, Convenience Stores & Shopping Centers . 8 Entertainment, Museums & Theatre . 9 Bars & Nightlife . 10 Barber Shops/Salons & Dry Cleaners .
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of the Group PDF 603KB
    2 Universal Registration Document 2020 / UNIBAIL-RODAMCO-WESTFIELD Presentation of the Group Presentation of the Group 1.1 KEY FACTS 3 1.2 HISTORY 4 1.3 STRATEGY AND BUSINESS MODEL 6 1.4 BUSINESS OVERVIEW 12 Business segments 12 Portfolio breakdown 13 Development pipeline 15 CHAPTER 1.5 PORTFOLIO 16 1.5.1 France: Shopping Centres 16 1.5.2 France: Convention & Exhibition 18 1.5.3 France: Offices 19 1.5.4 Central Europe: Shopping Centres 20 1.5.5 Central Europe: Offices 21 1.5.6 Spain: Shopping Centres 21 1.5.7 Spain: Offices 21 1.5.8 Nordics: Shopping Centres 22 1.5.9 Nordics: Offices 22 1.5.10 Austria: Shopping Centres 23 1.5.11 Austria: Offices 23 1.5.12 Germany: Shopping Centres 24 1.5.13 Germany: Offices 24 1.5.14 The Netherlands: Shopping Centres 25 1.5.15 The Netherlands: Offices 25 1.5.16 United States: Shopping Centres 26 1.5.17 United States: Offices 28 1.5.18 United Kingdom: Shopping Centres 29 1.5.19 United Kingdom: Offices 29 1.6 OVERVIEW OF VALUATION REPORTS PREPARED BY UNIBAIL-RODAMCO-WESTFIELD’S INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL APPRAISERS FOR EUROPEAN ASSETS 30 1.7 OVERVIEW OF VALUATION REPORTS PREPARED BY UNIBAIL-RODAMCO-WESTFIELD’S INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL APPRAISERS FOR AMERICAN ASSETS 32 1.8 STRUCTURE 34 1.9 SIMPLIFIED GROUP ORGANISATIONAL CHART 35 Universal Registration Document 2020 / UNIBAIL-RODAMCO-WESTFIELD 3 Presentation of the Group Key facts 1.1 KEY FACTS 1. 87 16 OFFICES & OTHERS SHOPPING CENTRES BUILDINGS(1) 10 80% CONVENTION & EXHIBITION COLLECTION RATE(3) VENUES(2) 247 ~3,100 COVID-19 ESG INITIATIVES EMPLOYEES €1,790 Mn €7.28 ADJUSTED RECURRING NET RENTAL INCOME EARNINGS PER SHARE €2.3 Bn €56.3 Bn DISPOSALS(4) GROSS MARKET VALUE €166.8 €4.4 Bn EPRA NET REINSTATEMENT PIPELINE VALUE PER SHARE (1) Only standalone offices > 10,000 sqm and offices affixed to a shopping centre > 15,000 sqm, including La Vaguada offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfield County River Report: 2020
    Fairfield County River Report Harbor Watch | 2020 Fairfield County River Report: 2020 Sarah C. Crosby Mary K. Donato Peter J. Fraboni Devan S. Healy Nicole C. Spiller Kasey E. Tietz Harbor Watch, Earthplace Inc., Westport, CT 06880 This report includes data on: Ash Creek Watershed, Aspetuck River, Byram River, Comstock Brook, Deadman’s Brook, Little River, Noroton River, Norwalk River, Rippowam River, Saugatuck River, Silvermine River, and Stony Brook. This report should be cited as: S.C. Crosby, M.K. Donato, P.J. Fraboni, D.S. Healy, N.C. Spiller, and K.E. Tietz. 2020. Fairfield County River Report 2020. Harbor Watch, Earthplace, Inc. 1-52 p. Fairfield County River Report 2020, Harbor Watch | 1 About Harbor Watch The mission of Harbor Watch is to improve water quality and ecosystem health in Connecticut. Each day we strive to reach this goal through research in the lab and field, collaboration with our partners, and education of students and the public. Harbor Watch addresses pollution threats to Long Island Sound and educates the next generation of scientists through hands-on research and experiential learning. As part of the larger organization of Earthplace, the work performed by Harbor Watch also supports the mission of Earthplace to build a passion in our community for nature and the environment through education, experience, and action. Since its inception, Harbor Watch has trained over 1,000 high school students, college interns, and adult volunteers in the work of protecting and improving the biological integrity of Long Island Sound and has monitored hundreds of sites for a variety of physical and biological parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Trumbull, Connecticut
    Trumbull, Connecticut CERC Town Profile 2018 Produced by The CT Data Collaborative Town Hall Belongs To 5866 Main Street Fairfield County Trumbull, CT 06611 LMA Bridgeport - Stamford (203) 452-5006 Metropolitan Planning Area Incorporated in 1797 Demographics Population Race/Ethnicity (2012-2016) Town County State Town County State 2000 34,243 882,567 3,405,565 White Alone, Non-Hispanic 29,171 598,017 2,464,450 2010 36,018 916,829 3,574,097 Black Alone 1,393 107,282 372,696 2012-2016 36,477 941,618 3,588,570 Asian 2,019 47,742 152,782 2020 35,389 944,692 3,604,591 Native American 73 2,441 9,399 '16 - '20 Growth / Yr -0.8% 0.1% 0.1% Other/Multi-Race 1,187 89,139 284,582 Town County State Hispanic or Latino 3,143 175,480 537,728 Land Area (sq. miles) 23 625 4,842 Town County State Pop./Sq. Mile (2012-2016) 1,564 1,507 741 Poverty Rate (2012-2016) 2.0% 8.8% 10.4% Median Age (2012-2016) 43 40 41 Educational Attainment (2012-2016) Households (2012-2016) 12,040 335,209 1,354,713 Town State Med. HH Inc. (2012-2016) $112,674 $86,670 $71,755 High School Graduate 4,966 20% 673,220 27% Town State Associates Degree 1,766 7% 184,426 7% Veterans (2012-2016) 1,782 188,759 Bachelors or Higher 12,646 52% 938,319 38% Age Distribution (2012-2016) 0-4 5-14 15-24 25-44 45-64 65+ Total Town 1,794 5% 5,454 15% 4,752 13% 7,326 20% 10,394 28% 6,757 19% 36,477 100% County 53,839 6% 127,239 14% 124,148 13% 231,225 25% 269,733 29% 135,434 14% 941,618 100% State 188,812 5% 439,100 12% 494,529 14% 878,077 24% 1,033,029 29% 555,023 15% 3,588,570 100% Economics Business
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Management Plan
    NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For: Town of Trumbull Trumbull, Connecticut October 18, 2012 Introduction Tighe&Bond Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Program Background In 1990, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated Phase I of its municipal stormwater program under the authority of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Phase I utilized National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coverage to address stormwater runoff from large municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) that served urbanized areas. The Stormwater Phase II Final Rule promulgated on December 8, 1999 requires MS4 operators in smaller urbanized areas to implement programs and practices aimed at controlling polluted stormwater runoff through the NPDES permit program. The EPA defines urbanized areas (UA) as “land comprising one or more places – central place(s) – and the adjacent densely settled surrounding area – urban fringe – that together have a residential population of at least 50,000 and an overall population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile”. Based upon this criteria, the Town of Trumbull is located entirely within an urbanized area. The program requires Phase II municipalities to develop a stormwater management plan outlining how the municipality intends to address the six minimum control measures set forth by EPA: ■ Public Education and Outreach ■ Public Involvement/Participation ■ Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ■ Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control ■ Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment ■ Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations 1.2 Statewide General Permit The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP) administers NPDES permitting in Connecticut and has issued a General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4).
    [Show full text]