Denmark: Defence Agreement 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Denmark: Defence Agreement 2010 DANISH DEFENCE AGREEMENT 2010 – 2014 Copenhagen, 24 June 2009 The Liberal Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Danish People’s Party, the Socialist People’s Party, the Conservative Party, the Radical Liberal Party and the Liberal Alliance Party have en- tered into the following agreement regarding Danish Defence for the period 2010-1014. Introduction The primary purpose of the Danish Armed Forces is to enforce the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark and to ensure the continued existence and integrity of the country. In the light of security policy developments in recent decades, the Danish Armed Forces are also assuming an increasing role as one of several important instruments of a pro-active Danish for- eign and security policy that, whilst respecting human rights, can contribute to the prevention of conflicts and war as well as the promotion of democracy and freedom in the world. In this context and in the light of the absence of a conventional threat to Danish territory, the Danish Armed Forces are currently undergoing an extensive transformation from a traditional mobilisation defence to a modern deployable defence force. By international standards, the Dan- ish Armed Forces have progressed far in this transformation process, and it is vital that this process is continued. Denmark’s membership of NATO is a cornerstone of Danish security and defence policy. In a strategic perspective Denmark’s sovereignty is secured through NATO’s Article 5 commitment to collective defence of Alliance territory. At the same time, NATO provides a framework for the participation of the Danish Armed Forces in international missions. Denmark will thus continue to work in favour of a transformation of the Alliance in tandem with the transformation of the military forces of Member States, seen also in relation to a strengthening of the demands placed by the Alliance on the usability of these military forces. An active Danish involvement in the UN is another cornerstone of Danish security and defence policy. Denmark should therefore work to ensure that the UN continues to constitute the foun- dation of the international system as the source for global legitimacy and the establishing of universal norms. Furthermore, Denmark should contribute to enhancing the UN’s capability for the conduct of peacekeeping operations. This could be achieved partly through focused coop- eration in Nordic circles. The already ongoing Nordic cooperation on the training and instruction of African peacekeeping forces will be continued and intensified, and potential opportunities for joint Nordic peacekeeping operations within the UN framework will similarly be pursued. Furthermore, in the event of the discontinuation of the Danish EU defence opt-out, the Danish Armed Forces must be able to participate in EU operations outside Union territory relating to peacemaking, peacekeeping, conflict resolution and humanitarian assistance as well as to strengthening international security in accordance with the principles of the UN Charter. The security policy platform for this agreement is based on the security policy recommendations set out in the report drafted by the 2008 Defence Commission. In relation to the future role of the Danish Armed Forces, it is, amongst other issues, concluded in the report, that the demand for Danish military contributions will not be diminished, and thus a continued transformation of the Danish Armed Forces is absolutely necessary. Western military forces, including the Danish Armed Forces, must continue to be able to fight conventional conflicts, but there will be an increasing need to be able to participate in other types of conflicts, such as counter-insurgency operations, peacemaking operations and recon- struction efforts. In summary, the Defence Commission Report recommends that the present national level of ambition regarding the ability of the Danish Armed Forces to contribute to international opera- tions be maintained. On this basis, the level of ambition determined by the political parties be- hind the Defence Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the Parties to the Defence Agreement) for the Danish Armed Forces is described in the present Defence Agreement’s section on the structure and tasks of the Danish Armed Forces, which thus serves as the basis for the Agree- ment. At the same time, the Arctic regions are expected to gain increasing international importance. The melting of the polar ice cap as a result of global warming will open new opportunities for the extraction of raw materials and the opening of new shipping routes. The rising activity will change the region's geostrategic dynamic and significance and will therefore in the long term present the Danish Armed Forces with several challenges. The tasks of the Danish Armed Forces can be divided into national and international tasks. Side 2/38 The national tasks comprise – besides monitoring of the national territory and enforcement of sovereignty – a range of more civilian-oriented tasks in support of Danish society, such as search and rescue operations, environmental tasks as well as providing support to a number of other public authorities, such as the police, the emergency rescue services and the tax authori- ties. The international tasks will typically fall within the following main areas: armed conflict, stabili- sation tasks and international policing. In relation to the international tasks, the Defence Commissions Report points out that the Dan- ish Armed Forces’ deployable capabilities in principle should be capable of being deployed glob- ally. This means, for example, that the Danish Armed Forces should have the ability to deploy forces in areas which feature demanding climate and terrain conditions, such as desert and mountain areas. In addition, the Danish Armed Forces should be able to operate in areas with limited infrastructure as well as in urbanised areas. Combined, these operational conditions will therefore place great demands on the Danish Armed Forces’ personnel, equipment, training, lo- gistical capability and mobility, including for example strategic maritime and air transport capa- bility. In addition, the Defence Commission Report states that it is expected that the future operational environment will continue to place great demands on the operational units of the Danish Armed Forces, with regard also to training and equipment. Past developments and expected future de- velopments within international operations indicate, for example, that the future operational en- vironment could be characterised by a high threat level. The accompanying need to protect per- sonnel places great demands on the equipment, personnel and training of contingents. At the same time, it is expected that the Danish Armed Forces, in connection with international mis- sions, must increasingly be prepared to encounter both asymmetric instruments of warfare (e.g. improved explosive devices (roadside bombs) and suicide attacks) and more conventional in- struments of warfare (e.g. indirect fire from rockets and mortars). More technologically advanced instruments of warfare, such as long-range rockets and missiles as well as cyberspace attacks against computer systems, must also be expected to be used against Danish contingents from all three armed services. At the same time, according to the Defence Commission Report, the possibility of having to con- duct operations against more conventionally organised and operating opponents still exist. The Parties to the Defence Agreement are in agreement that the Danish Armed Forces must also maintain the ability to fight and win this type of conflict. The Parties to the Defence Agreement are also in agreement that the developments in line with the Defence Commission Report indicate that the demand for Danish contributions to interna- tional operations will not diminish in the future and that such operations will often be long-term Side 3/38 in nature. This underscores the need for the operational capabilities of the Danish Armed Forces – of all services – to be, as a whole, sufficiently robust and capable of a sustained effort in order to support long-termed international engagements. Moreover, in special situations the Danish Armed Forces should possess the ability to deploy additional or larger contingents for shorter periods of time as well as the ability to deploy contingents at short notice in connection with cri- sis management, humanitarian disasters, evacuation operations, demonstrations of solidarity or of NATO’s commitment, etc., which can be ensured through, among other things, participation in NATO´s response forces. The Defence Commission Report also states that in the future a growing need for the Danish Armed Forces to be able to contribute to military capacity building is foreseen, both preventively in order to prevent conflicts and in parallel with, for example, performing stabilisation tasks dur- ing a conflict. At the same time, it is expected that also in the future the objective of stabilisa- tion operations – and to a certain extent armed conflicts – can only be achieved by integrating military and civilian activities in the area of operation. This means, on the one hand, that the al- ready initiated integration efforts must be maintained and broadened. On the other hand, this aspect entails that the achievement of the goal of a military operation is often dependent on ci- vilian initiatives, such as reconstruction. In order to ensure future military and overall political success in international operations, it
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of Conditions for Danish Defence Policy – Strategic Choices
    centre for military studies university of copenhagen An Analysis of Conditions for Danish Defence Policy – Strategic Choices 2012 This analysis is part of the research-based services for public authorities carried out at the Centre for Military Studies for the parties to the Danish Defence Agreement. Its purpose is to analyse the conditions for Danish security policy in order to provide an objective background for a concrete discussion of current security and defence policy problems and for the long-term development of security and defence policy. The Centre for Military Studies is a research centre at the Department of —Political Science at the University of Copenhagen. At the centre research is done in the fields of security and defence policy and military strategy, and the research done at the centre forms the foundation for research-based services for public authorities for the Danish Ministry of Defence and the parties to the Danish Defence Agreement. This analysis is based on research-related method and its conclusions can —therefore not be interpreted as an expression of the attitude of the Danish Government, of the Danish Armed Forces or of any other authorities. Please find more information about the centre and its activities at: http://cms.polsci.ku.dk/. References to the literature and other material used in the analysis can be found at http://cms.polsci.ku.dk/. The original version of this analysis was published in Danish in April 2012. This version was translated to English by The project group: Major Esben Salling Larsen, Military Analyst Major Flemming Pradhan-Blach, MA, Military Analyst Professor Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen (Project Leader) Dr Lars Bangert Struwe, Researcher With contributions from: Dr Henrik Ø.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Budgets and Cooperation in Europe: Developments, Trends and Drivers
    January 2016 Defence Budgets and Cooperation in Europe: Developments, Trends and Drivers Edited by Alessandro Marrone, Olivier De France, Daniele Fattibene Defence Budgets and Cooperation in Europe: Developments, Trends and Drivers Edited by Alessandro Marrone, Olivier De France and Daniele Fattibene Contributors: Bengt-Göran Bergstrand, FOI Marie-Louise Chagnaud, SWP Olivier De France, IRIS Thanos Dokos, ELIAMEP Daniele Fattibene, IAI Niklas Granholm, FOI John Louth, RUSI Alessandro Marrone, IAI Jean-Pierre Maulny, IRIS Francesca Monaco, IAI Paola Sartori, IAI Torben Schütz, SWP Marcin Terlikowski, PISM 1 Index Executive summary ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 List of abbreviations --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Chapter 1 - Defence spending in Europe in 2016 --------------------------------------------------------- 8 1.1 Bucking an old trend ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 1.2 Three scenarios ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.3 National data and analysis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 1.3.1 Central and Eastern Europe -------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 1.3.2 Nordic region --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • European Defence Cooperation After the Lisbon Treaty
    DIIS REPORT 2015: 06 EUROPEAN DEFENCE COOPERATION AFTER THE LISBON TREATY The road is paved for increased momentum This report is written by Christine Nissen and published by DIIS as part of the Defence and Security Studies. Christine Nissen is PhD student at DIIS. DIIS · Danish Institute for International Studies Østbanegade 117, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Tel: +45 32 69 87 87 E-mail: [email protected] www.diis.dk Layout: Lone Ravnkilde & Viki Rachlitz Printed in Denmark by Eurographic Danmark Coverphoto: EU Naval Media and Public Information Office ISBN 978-87-7605-752-7 (print) ISBN 978-87-7605-753-4 (pdf) © Copenhagen 2015, the author and DIIS Table of Contents Abbreviations 4 Executive summary / Resumé 5 Introduction 7 The European Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) 11 External Action after the Lisbon Treaty 12 Consequences of the Lisbon changes 17 The case of Denmark 27 – consequences of the Danish defence opt-out Danish Security and defence policy – outside the EU framework 27 Consequences of the Danish defence opt-out in a Post-Lisbon context 29 Conclusion 35 Bibliography 39 3 Abbreviations CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CPCC Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability CSDP Common Security and Defence Policy DEVCO European Commission – Development & Cooperation ECHO European Commission – Humanitarian Aid & Civil Protection ECJ European Court of Justice EDA European Defence Agency EEAS European External Action Service EMU Economic and Monetary Union EU The European Union EUMS EU Military Staff FAC Foreign Affairs Council HR High
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteers in the Danish Home Guard 2016 17:10 - Rd 2016 a U G
    T. FRI T. VOLUNTEERS IN db ER g , M. LARSEN THE DANISH VOLUNTEERS IN THE DANISH HOME GUARD 2016 HOME GUARD 2016 V This report maps the composition of a group of volunteer members of the Home Guard, as well as their opi- O LUNT nions and expectations of the Home Guard and their own voluntary efforts. The report is a follow-up to two previous surveys completed in 2007 and 2011 and it therefore also highlights changes from 2007 to 2011 EE and 2016. RS IN TH Based on a questionnaire survey, the report paints a picture of who the volunteers are, what motivates them and how they perceive their surrounding environment’s view of them as members of the Home Guard. The report also focuses on the volunteers’ view of the Home Guard’s tasks and activities both in Denmark and E D abroad. Finally, the report describes the volunteers’ perception of the Home Guards’ communication and A NISH H campaigns. The report was commissioned and financed by the Danish Home Guard Command. O M E G U A RD 2016 17:10 17:10 SFI – The Danish National Centre for Social Research TOrBEn FridBErG 17:10 MOnA LArsEn ISSN: 1396-1810 SFI_17-10.indd 1 16/03/2017 11.01 17:10 VOLUNTEERS IN THE DANISH HOME GUARD 2016 TORBEN FRIDBERG MONA LARSEN COPENHAGEN 2017 SFI - THE DANISH NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH VOLUNTEERS IN THE DANISH HOME GUARD 2016 Department manager: Lisbeth Pedersen Department of Employment, Education and Social Inclusion ISSN: 1396-1810 ISBN: 978-87-7119-436-4 e-ISBN: 978-87-7119-437-4 Layout: Hedda Bank Cover photo: Colourbox Print run: 500 Printing: Rosendahls a/s © 2017 SFI - The National Centre for Social Research SFI – The Danish National Centre for Social Research Herluf Trolles Gade 11 1052 Copenhagen K, Denmark Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Trine Bramsen Minister of Defence 24 September 2020 Via E
    Trine Bramsen Minister of Defence 24 September 2020 Via e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Dear Minister, Thank you for your letter dated 12 May 2020. I am writing on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) Foundation and our US affiliate, which has more than 6.5 million members and supporters worldwide. We appreciate that the Danish armed forces have reduced their use of animals for live tissue training (LTT) from 110 animals in 2016 – as reported by the Danish Defence Command on 3 July 2020 pursuant to a citizen's request – to only nine animals in 2020. Considering how few animals have been used for LTT this year and given that a ratio of two to six students per animal (as stated in the new five-year "Militær traumatologi" LTT permit1) amounts to only 18 to 54 personnel undergoing the training this year, there is no significant investment in – or compelling justification for – using animals in LTT. Based on the information presented in this letter, we urge you to immediately suspend all use of animals for LTT while the Danish Armed Forces Medical Command conducts a comprehensive new evaluation of available non-animal trauma training methods to achieve full compliance with Directive 2010/63/EU and, in light of this evaluation, provide a definitive timeline for fully ending the Danish armed forces' use of animals for LTT. Danish Defence Command Does Not Have a List of LTT Simulation Models It Has Reviewed The aforementioned citizen's request asked for the following information: "[a] list of non-animal models that have been reviewed by the Danish Ministry of Defence for live tissue training (otherwise known as LTT or trauma training), with dates indicating when these reviews were conducted, and reasons why these non-animal models were rejected as full replacements to the use of animals for this training".2 1Animal Experiments Inspectorate, Ministry of Environment and Food.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Way Towards a European Defence Union - a White Book As a First Step
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY On the way towards a European Defence Union - A White Book as a first step ABSTRACT This study proposes a process, framed in the Lisbon Treaty, for the EU to produce a White Book (WB) on European defence. Based on document reviews and expert interviewing, this study details the core elements of a future EU Defence White Book: strategic objectives, necessary capabilities development, specific programs and measures aimed at achieving the improved capabilities, and the process and drafting team of a future European WB. The study synthesizes concrete proposals for each European institution, chief among which is calling on the European Council to entrust the High Representative with the drafting of the White Book. EP/EXPO/B/SEDE/2015/03 EN April 2016 - PE 535.011 © European Union, 2016 Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Sub-Committee on Security and Defence. English-language manuscript was completed on 18 April 2016. Translated into FR/ DE. Printed in Belgium. Author(s): Prof. Dr. Javier SOLANA, President, ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Spain Prof. Dr. Angel SAZ-CARRANZA, Director, ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Spain María GARCÍA CASAS, Research Assistant, ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Spain Jose Francisco ESTÉBANEZ GÓMEZ, Research Assistant, ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Spain Official Responsible: Wanda TROSZCZYNSKA-VAN GENDEREN, Jérôme LEGRAND Editorial Assistants: Elina STERGATOU, Ifigeneia ZAMPA Feedback of all kind is welcome. Please write to: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Military Security and Social Welfare in Denmark from 1848 to the Cold War Petersen, Klaus
    www.ssoar.info The Welfare Defence: Military Security and Social Welfare in Denmark from 1848 to the Cold War Petersen, Klaus Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Petersen, K. (2020). The Welfare Defence: Military Security and Social Welfare in Denmark from 1848 to the Cold War. Historical Social Research, 45(2), 164-186. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.45.2020.2.164-186 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de The Welfare Defence: Military Security and Social Welfare in Denmark from 1848 to the Cold War Klaus Petersen∗ Abstract: »Die Wohlfahrtsverteidigung: Militärische Sicherheit und Soziale Wohlfahrt in Dänemark von 1848 bis zum kalten Krieg«. In this article, I discuss the connection between security and social policy strategies in Denmark from 1848 up to the 1950s. Denmark is not the first country that comes to mind when discussing the connections between war, military conscription, and social reforms. Research into social reforms and the role war and the military play in this field has traditionally focused on superpowers and regional powers. The main argument in the article is that even though we do not find policy-makers legitimizing specific welfare reforms using security policy motives, or the mili- tary playing any significant role in policy-making, it is nevertheless relevant to discuss the links between war and welfare in Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark 2019 Human Rights Report
    DENMARK 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kingdom of Denmark is a constitutional monarchy with democratic, parliamentary rule. Queen Margrethe II is head of state. A prime minister, usually the leader of the largest party of a multiparty coalition, is head of government and presides over the cabinet, which is accountable to a unicameral parliament (Folketing). The kingdom includes Greenland and the Faroe Islands, which are autonomous with similar political structures and legal rights. They manage most of their domestic affairs, while the central Danish government is responsible for constitutional matters, citizenship, monetary and currency matters, foreign relations, and defense and security policy. Observers deemed national elections on June 5 free and fair. On June 27, the center-left Social Democratic Party formed a single-party minority government headed by Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen. The National Police maintain internal security and, jointly with the Danish Immigration Service, is responsible for border enforcement at the country’s ports of entry. The Ministry of Justice oversees both services. The Armed Forces report to the Ministry of Defense and have responsibility for external security in addition to some domestic security responsibilities, such as disaster response and maritime sovereignty enforcement. The Home Guard, a volunteer militia under the Ministry of Defense but without constabulary powers, assists the National Police in conducting border checks. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the National Police, the Danish Immigration Service, and the Armed Forces, and the government has effective mechanisms to investigate and punish abuse. There were no reports of significant human rights abuses. The government took steps to identify, investigate, prosecute, and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Max A.L.T. Nielsen Lieutenant General Military Representative to NATO and EU DATE OF BIRTH: November 6. 1963 PRIVATE: Married to Berit Thorsø Nielsen. Two children and three grandchildren. MILITARY EDUCATION: 1983 Conscript 1984 NCO School 1985 Control, Reporting and Fighter Control Education 1986 - 1988 Officers Basic Course 1991 Junior Joint Staff Course 1991 - 1992 Officers Advanced Course 1995 - 1996 Air Command and Staff College, US 2011 NATO Defense College, Rome, IT. MILITARY CAREER: 1984 Sergeant 1987 Lieutenant 1988 First Lieutenant 1992 Captain 1996 Major 2001 Lieutenant Colonel 2005 Colonel 2008 Brigadier General 2014 Major General 2017 Lieutenant General ASSIGNMENTS: 1984 Section Commander, Training Platoon/Air Base Skrydstrup 1987 Platoon Commander, Training Squadron/Air Base Aalborg 1988 Fighter & SAM Control Officer, C&R Group, 602 SQN Airbase/Skrydstrup 1992 Air Defence Operations Officer/ICAOC 1 Finderup 1993 Staff Officer, Training Branch/Tactical Air Command Denmark 1994 Staff Officer, Policy Branch/Tactical Air Command Denmark 1996 Chief of Air Operations Branch/Tactical Air Command Denmark 1998 Staff Officer and Deputy Head, Policy Branch/Defence Command Denmark 2000 Staff Officer Operations, 1st Office/Ministry of Defence. 2001 Chief of Staff & Acting Commandant/Royal Danish Air Force Academy 2002 Chief of Operations Branch/Defence Command Denmark 2005 Military Assistant to the Deputy Commander/NATO Training Mission-Iraq. Baghdad 2005 Chief of Executive Office/Defence Commander Denmark 2008 Chief
    [Show full text]
  • Contact to Delegates And
    NATO Countries Delegate/POC e-mail Phone Fax Mr. SFC VAN EECKHOUT 0032 2 264 5735 0032 2 264 5774 Belgian Defence Kwartier Koningin Astrid Bruynstr. 1 Belgium B-1120 BRUSSEL [email protected] Mrs Lt Col NEDEVA +35 929 22 2235 0035 9888 79 77 21 Gen Staff of Bulgarian Armed Forces J2 34 Totleben Blvd SOFIA Bulgaria BULGARIA [email protected] Mrs. Maj McQuarrie 0061 3 996 7586 00613 992 1049 Directorate Human Rights & Diversity National Defence Headquarters HQ 101 Colonel By Drive OTTAWA, K1A 0K2 Canada CANADA [email protected] Mrs Lt Col GEDAYOVA 00420 923 210 327 00420 973 212 094 Ministry of Defence Joint Operations Center Vitezne namesti 5 160 00 PRAHA 6 Czech Republic CZECH REPUBLIC [email protected] Special Advisor Mrs CHRISTENSEN 0045 3266 5313 +45 3266 5599 Danish Defence Perosonnel Organization Sominegraven, Bldg 24 1439 COPENHAGEN DENMARK Denmark [email protected] Mrs Cpt KÜNNAPUU 3727171523 3725026019 General Staff of the Estonian Defence Forces Juhkentali 58 15007 Estonia TALLINN [email protected] Mr. Lt Col ADELL, 00331 72 69 20 89 00331 42 19 43 54 Etat-Major des Armees - ORH Rue Saint Dominique 14 00456 ARMEES France FRANCE [email protected] Cdr Mauersberger Federal Ministry of Defence Armed Forces Staff I 3 P.O. BOX 13 28 D- Germany 53003 BONN [email protected] Mrs Lt Col DIMITRIOU 0030 210 651 7648 Evolution Center Hellenic National General Staff Messogion Ave. 151 15500 HOLARGOS ATHENS Greece GREECE [email protected] 0030 210 6 57 62 46 Lt Col BALLAINE 0036 23 65 331 0036 23 65 111 / 26018 Közgazdasagi es Penzügyi Ügynökseg Aba uta 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Policy and the Armed Forces During the Pandemic Herunterladen
    1 2 3 2020, Toms Rostoks and Guna Gavrilko In cooperation with the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung With articles by: Thierry Tardy, Michael Jonsson, Dominic Vogel, Elisabeth Braw, Piotr Szyman- ski, Robin Allers, Paal Sigurd Hilde, Jeppe Trautner, Henri Vanhanen and Kalev Stoicesku Language editing: Uldis Brūns Cover design and layout: Ieva Stūre Printed by Jelgavas tipogrāfija Cover photo: Armīns Janiks All rights reserved © Toms Rostoks and Guna Gavrilko © Authors of the articles © Armīns Janiks © Ieva Stūre © Uldis Brūns ISBN 978-9984-9161-8-7 4 Contents Introduction 7 NATO 34 United Kingdom 49 Denmark 62 Germany 80 Poland 95 Latvia 112 Estonia 130 Finland 144 Sweden 160 Norway 173 5 Toms Rostoks is a senior researcher at the Centre for Security and Strategic Research at the National Defence Academy of Latvia. He is also associate professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Univer- sity of Latvia. 6 Introduction Toms Rostoks Defence spending was already on the increase in most NATO and EU member states by early 2020, when the coronavirus epi- demic arrived. Most European countries imposed harsh physical distancing measures to save lives, and an economic downturn then ensued. As the countries of Europe and North America were cau- tiously trying to open up their economies in May 2020, there were questions about the short-term and long-term impact of the coro- navirus pandemic, the most important being whether the spread of the virus would intensify after the summer. With the number of Covid-19 cases rapidly increasing in September and October and with no vaccine available yet, governments in Europe began to impose stricter regulations to slow the spread of the virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Forces Modernisation Projects 8 2.1 Denmark’S Defence Agreement 2018-2023 9 2.2 Hungary’S Zrinyi 2026 10 2.3 the United Kingdom’S to the Future and Beyond
    Food for thought 03-2021 Land Forces Modernisation Challenges of Transformation Written by Miguel Gonzalez Buitrago Lucia Santabarbara AN EXPERTISE FORUM CONTRIBUTING TO EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTING TO FORUM AN EXPERTISE SINCE 1953 ARMIES INTEROPERABILITY European Army Interoperability Center Simone Rinaldi This paper was drawn up by Miguel Gonzalez Buitrago, Lucia Santabarbara and Sim- one Rinaldi under the supervision and guidance of Mr Mario Blokken, Director of the Permanent Secretariat. This Food for Thought paper is a document that gives an initial reflection on the theme. The content is not reflecting the positions of the member states but consists of elements that can initiate and feed the discussions and analyses in the domain of the theme. All our studies are available on www.finabel.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Military Doctrine and Warfare Scenarios 3 1.1 Unconventional Warfare 4 1.2 Asymmetric Warfare 6 1.3 Hybrid Warfare 7 Chapter 2: Land Forces Modernisation Projects 8 2.1 Denmark’s Defence Agreement 2018-2023 9 2.2 Hungary’s Zrinyi 2026 10 2.3 The United Kingdom’s to the Future and Beyond. 11 2.4 Greece’s Future Force Structure 2013-2027 12 2.5 Finland’s Total Defence 14 Chapter 3: Cutting edge technology: “Looking at the near future.” 15 3.1 Drones and Jammers 17 3.2 Drone Swarms 19 3.3 Hypersonic Weaponry 19 Chapter 4: Modernisation of Military Training 20 Conclusions 22 Bibliography 23 2 INTRODUCTION Land Force Modernisation is a process that omous systems. These may shape the nature entails changes of military equipment and ca- of conflict and facilitate ground forces oper- pacities at the strategic, operational, and tac- ations in challenging contexts.
    [Show full text]