Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment 20 December 2019 Version 2 Prepared by EBS Ecology for ElectraNet Document Control Revision No. Date issued Authors Reviewed by Date Reviewed Revision type Mark Laws, 1 22/11/2019 Dr Marina Louter 22/11/2019 Draft Jesse Carpenter Mark Laws, 2 20/12/2019 Dr Marina Louter 20/12/2019 Final Emma Tremain Distribution of Copies Revision No. Date issued Media Issued to 1 27/11/2019 Electronic Alecia Wright, ElectraNet 2 20/12/2019 Electronic Alecia Wright, ElectraNet EBS Ecology Project Number: E90106A COPYRIGHT: Use or copying of this document in whole or in part (including photographs) without the written permission of EBS Ecology’s client and EBS Ecology constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of EBS Ecology’s client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between EBS Ecology and its client. EBS Ecology accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. CITATION: EBS Ecology (2019) Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment. Report to ElectraNet. EBS Ecology, Adelaide. Cover photograph: Lasiopetalum behrii (Pink Velvet-bush). EBS Ecology 125 Hayward Avenue Torrensville, South Australia 5031 t: 08 7127 5607 http://www.ebsecology.com.au email: [email protected] Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATION OF TERMS BAM Bushland Assessment Method BDBSA Biological Database of South Australia (maintained by DEW) DEH Department for Environment and Heritage (now DEW) DEW Department for Environment and Water (South Australia) DotE Department of the Environment (now DotEE) (Commonwealth) DotEE Department of the Environment and Energy (Commonwealth) EBS Environment and Biodiversity Services Pty Ltd – trading as EBS Ecology EPBC Act Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ha Hectare(s) IBRA Interim Biogeographical Regionalisation of Australia km Kilometre(s) kV Kilovolt(s) m Metre(s) m2 Square metre(s) MNES Matter(s) of National Environmental Significance (under the EPBC Act) NCSSA Nature Conservation Society of South Australia NatureMaps Initiative of DEW that provides a common access point to maps and geographic information about South Australia's natural resources in an interactive online mapping format. NPW Act National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 NRM Natural Resources Management NRM Act Natural Resources Management Act 2004 NV Act Native Vegetation Act 1991 NVC Native Vegetation Council NVF Native Vegetation Fund NVMU Native Vegetation Management Unit pers. comm. Personal communication PMST Protected Matters Search Tool (under the EPBC Act, maintained by DotEE) Project The replacement of the existing and soon to be insufficient Eyre Peninsula transmission line Project Area The proposed Eyre Peninsula transmission line corridor from Port Lincoln to Cultana (100 m easement) ii Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment SA South Australia(n) SEB Significant Environmental Benefit sp. species spp. species (plural) ssp. sub-species TEC Threatened Ecological Community var. Variety – a taxonomic rank below that of species and subspecies, but above that of form WoNS Weeds of national significance iii Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment Table of Contents 1 APPLICATION INFORMATION ............................................................................... 1 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 2 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................. 3 3.1 Project rationale ......................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Project Area ............................................................................................................................... 3 3.2.1 Administrative boundaries ............................................................................................ 3 3.3 Infrastructure impact requirements ............................................................................................ 5 3.4 Previous ecological assessments .............................................................................................. 7 3.5 Compliance and legislative summary ........................................................................................ 8 3.6 Environmental setting ................................................................................................................ 8 3.6.1 Region ........................................................................................................................... 8 3.6.2 Existing land use ........................................................................................................... 8 3.6.3 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.6.4 Protected areas............................................................................................................. 8 3.6.5 Interim Biogeographical Regionalisation of Australia ................................................... 9 4 METHODS ............................................................................................................. 18 4.1 Desktop Assessment ............................................................................................................... 18 4.1.1 EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST) .................................................... 18 4.1.2 Biological Database of South Australia (BDBSA) ....................................................... 18 4.1.3 Likelihood of occurrence assessment ........................................................................ 18 4.2 Native vegetation assessment ................................................................................................. 19 4.2.1 Bushland Assessment Method (BAM) ........................................................................ 19 4.2.2 Rangeland Assessment Method (RAM) ..................................................................... 20 4.2.3 Block determination .................................................................................................... 21 4.2.4 BAM and RAM scoresheets ........................................................................................ 21 4.2.5 SEB calculations ......................................................................................................... 22 4.2.6 Sandalwood survey .................................................................................................... 22 4.3 Fauna assessment .................................................................................................................. 24 4.3.1 Birds ............................................................................................................................ 24 4.3.2 Mammals and reptiles ................................................................................................. 24 4.4 Limitations ................................................................................................................................ 24 4.4.1 Desktop assessment limitations ................................................................................. 24 4.4.2 Native vegetation assessment limitations ................................................................... 24 4.4.3 Fauna survey limitations ............................................................................................. 25 5 DESKTOP ASSESSMENT RESULTS ................................................................... 26 iv Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Native Vegetation Assessment 5.1 Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) ........................................................ 26 5.1.1 Threatened ecological communities (TECs) ............................................................... 27 5.1.2 Nationally threatened flora .......................................................................................... 28 5.1.3 Nationally threatened fauna ........................................................................................ 37 5.1.4 Migratory fauna ........................................................................................................... 37 5.2 Matters of State Significance ................................................................................................... 49 5.2.1 State threatened flora ................................................................................................. 49 5.2.2 State threatened fauna ............................................................................................... 49 6 NATIVE VEGETATION ASSESSMENT RESULTS ............................................... 54 6.1 Flora ......................................................................................................................................... 54 6.1.1 Threatened flora ......................................................................................................... 54 6.1.2
Recommended publications
  • The-Potential-Use-For-Groundwater
    i Professor Peter Cook 84 Richmond Avenue Colonel Light Gardens SA 5041 [email protected] Professor Derek Eamus School of Life Sciences University of Technology Sydney PO Box 123 Sydney NSW 2007 [email protected] Cover Photo: Open woodland vegetation in the Ti Tree Basin. ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 9 2. METHODOLOGIES TO INFER GROUNDWATER USE .......................................................... 11 2.1 Direct Measurements of Rooting Depth 11 2.2 Soil Water Potentials 12 2.3 Leaf and Soil Water Potentials 13 2.4 Stable Isotopes 2H and 18O 14 2.5 Depth of Water Use and Groundwater Access 16 2.6 Green Islands 17 2.7 Transpiration Rates 19 2.8 Tree Rings 20 2.9 Dendrometry 22 2.10 13C of Sapwood 22 3. GROUNDWATER AND VEGETATION IN THE TI TREE BASIN .............................................. 24 3.1 Geography and Climate 24 3.2 Groundwater Resources 27 3.3 Vegetation Across the Ti Tree Basin 29 4. TI TREE BASIN GDE STUDIES ............................................................................................. 32 4.1 Transpiration and Evapotranspiration Rates 32 4.2 Soil Water Potentials 35 4.3 Leaf Water Potentials 38 4.4 Stable Isotopes 43 4.5 Sapwood 13C and Leaf Vein Density 44 5. OTHER ARID ZONE STUDIES .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Hill Complex
    Broken Hill Complex Bioregion resources Photo Mulyangarie, DEH Broken Hill Complex The Broken Hill Complex bioregion is located in western New South Wales and eastern South Australia, spanning the NSW-SA border. It includes all of the Barrier Ranges and covers a huge area of nearly 5.7 million hectares with approximately 33% falling in South Australia! It has an arid climate with dry hot summers and mild winters. The average rainfall is 222mm per year, with slightly more rainfall occurring in summer. The bioregion is rich with Aboriginal cultural history, with numerous archaeological sites of significance. Biodiversity and habitat The bioregion consists of low ranges, and gently rounded hills and depressions. The main vegetation types are chenopod and samphire shrublands; casuarina forests and woodlands and acacia shrublands. Threatened animal species include the Yellow-footed Rock- wallaby and Australian Bustard. Grazing, mining and wood collection for over 100 years has led to a decline in understory plant species and cover, affecting ground nesting birds and ground feeding insectivores. 2 | Broken Hill Complex Photo by Francisco Facelli Broken Hill Complex Threats Threats to the Broken Hill Complex bioregion and its dependent species include: For Further information • erosion and degradation caused by overgrazing by sheep, To get involved or for more information please cattle, goats, rabbits and macropods phone your nearest Natural Resources Centre or • competition and predation by feral animals such as rabbits, visit www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide Botanic Gardens
    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2008 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 22 (2008) 5–8 © 2008 Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia Prasophyllum laxum (Orchidaceae), a new leek-orchid species from southern Eyre Peninsula, South Australia Robert J. Bates C/- State Herbarium of South Australia, Plant Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Prasophyllum laxum R.J.Bates, a rare local endemic leek orchid from southern Eyre Peninsula, South Australia, is described as new and illustrations and a key to related South Australian species are provided. Introduction Prasophyllum laxum has been compared with P. A single collection at the State Herbarium of lindleyanum Rchb.f. (as P. aff. lindleyanum; Bates South Australia (AD) of an apparently undescribed 2006), mainly because of the sigmoid labellum, but that Prasophyllum from southern Eyre Peninsula, hundred of species is restricted to Tasmania and (mostly eastern) Koppio, section 212 (M.G.Clark 212) had long intrigued Victoria and has rigidly erect spikes with usually green the author but despite many searches on Southern Eyre and white, very neat flowers with the short labellum Peninsula from 1982 to 2002 no further plants were having strongly incurved margins, and the callus shortly located.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS and ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY of EUCALYPTUS SP LEAF EXTRACT AGAINST CLINICAL PATHOGENS S.Sasikala and J
    International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2249-6807 International Journal of Institutional Pharmacy and Life Sciences 4(6): November-December 2014 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACY AND LIFE SCIENCES Life Sciences Research Article……!!! Received: 27-10-2014; Revised: 31-10-2014; Accepted: 01-11-2014 PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF EUCALYPTUS SP LEAF EXTRACT AGAINST CLINICAL PATHOGENS S.Sasikala and J. Kalaimathi* Department of Biochemistry, Sri Akilandeswari womens College Wandiwash, TN, India Keywords: ABSTRACT Eucalyptus globulus, Medicinal plants are considerably useful and economically Medicinal palnt, essential. They contain active constituents that are used in the Antimicrobial activity treatment of many human diseases. Infectious diseases are world’s most important reason of untimely death, killing For Correspondence: 50,000 people each day. Resistance to antimicrobial agents is J. Kalaimathi rising in a wide diversity of pathogens and numerous drug Department of Biochemistry, resistances are becoming common in diverse organisms. The Sri Akilandeswari womens plant extracts have been developed and proposed for use as College Wandiwash, TN, India antimicrobial substances. Many of the plant materials used in E-mail: traditional medicine are readily available in rural areas at relatively cheaper than modern medicine. The present study [email protected] was aimed to evaluate the antibacterial potential of methanol extract of Eucalyptus globulus against bacterial pathogens and phytochemical analysis was done. 47 Full Text Available On www.ijipls.com International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2249-6807 INTRODUCTION In the production of drugs, the role of plants is very important. There is a lot of drugs are produced from the plants and its various parts (Fabricant and Farnsworth 2001, Farnsworth et al., 19858) .
    [Show full text]
  • Eucalyptus Cladocalyx Sugar Gum Classification Eucalyptus | Symphyomyrtus | Sejunctae Nomenclature
    Euclid - Online edition Eucalyptus cladocalyx Sugar gum Classification Eucalyptus | Symphyomyrtus | Sejunctae Nomenclature Eucalyptus cladocalyx F.Muell., Linnaea 25: 388 (1853). E. corynocalyx F.Muell., Fragm. 2: 43 (1860), nom. illeg. based on same types as E. cladocalyx. T: Marble Ra., S.A., Feb. 1852, C.Wilhelmi s.n.; holo: MEL; iso: K. E. langii Maiden & Blakely, Crit. Revis. Eucalyptus 8: 72 (1929). T: cultivated at Litanga Stn, Lismore, Vic., Apr. 1921, P.R.H.St John s.n.; holo: NSW, iso: CANB. (see image of type specimen held at CANB) Description Buds cylindrical Tree to 35 m tall. Lignotuber absent but epicormic buds present up the stem. Bark smooth, mottled white, yellow, pink, orange, brown, pale grey, dark grey or blue grey, sometimes slightly powdery. Juvenile growth (coppice or wild seedling to 50 cm tall): stems round in cross-section; juvenile leaves always petiolate, opposite at lowest node then alternate, orbicular (often wider than long), deltoid to ovate, 2–6.5 cm long, 2–9 cm wide, apex round or emarginate, base Fruit barrel-shaped truncate, discolorous, dull, blue-green to green. Adult leaves alternate, petiole 0.9–2.7 cm long; blade slightly falcate to lanceolate, 6.5–17 cm long, 1.2–4 cm wide, base usually tapering to petiole, strongly discolorous, glossy, darker green on upper side, paler below, side-veins at an acute or wider angle, densely to very densely reticulate, intramarginal vein parallel to and well removed from margin, oil glands small, obscure. Inflorescence axillary unbranched but borne on leafless sections of branchlets (ramiflorous), peduncles 0.8–2.2 cm long, buds 7, 9 or 11 per umbel, pedicels 0.2–0.7 cm long.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Gum Country (Eucalyptus Salmonophloia)
    This publication is designed to assist land Contents managers to identify the different vegetation and soil types that make up the Central and 2 Introduction Eastern Wheatbelt and enable them to best 3 Using This Guide decide the most suitable species when Find out how planning biodiverse revegetation. to prepare 4 Preparation and your site for Establishment Of Your Site regeneration 7 Revegetation Timeline 8 Red Morell Country 10 Gimlet Country 12 Salmon Gum Country Choose your soil type 14 Jam or York Gum Country 16 Tammar Country 18 White Gum Country 20 Mallee Country All flower, tree and landscape Introductory pages written Thanks to all Shire Natural 22 Sandplain or Wodjil photographs have been by Tracey Hobbs, Natural Resource Management kindly donated by Stephen Resource Management Officers in the Central Fry, Natural Resource Officer, Kellerberrin. and Eastern Wheatbelt for 24 Sandy Saline Systems Management Officer, Revegetation pages written edits and advice throughout Bruce Rock. by Stephen Fry, Natural the publishing process of Resource Management this book. Officer, Bruce Rock For further information This publication has been Publication designed Ken Hodgkiss & or assistance please contact funded by the Australian by Juliette Dujardin. friend, John Butcher, the Natural Resource Government’s Clean Energy Lawry Keeler & Management Officer Future Biodiversity Fund. Merrilyn Temby at your local Shire. 1 This publication has been written from a practical The Avon Catchment of WA has less than on-ground perspective for landholders to identify 10% of its original vegetation remaining. their own soil/vegetation types and the best species to use for their revegetation project.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Eyre Iron Project Environmental Impact Statement
    Central Eyre Iron Project Environmental Impact Statement EIS REFERENCES REFERENCES COPYRIGHT Copyright © Iron Road Limited, 2015 All rights reserved This document and any related documentation is protected by copyright owned by Iron Road Limited. The content of this document and any related documentation may only be copied and distributed for the purposes of section 46B of the Development Act, 1993 (SA) and otherwise with the prior written consent of Iron Road Limited. DISCLAIMER Iron Road Limited has taken all reasonable steps to review the information contained in this document and to ensure its accuracy as at the date of submission. Note that: (a) in writing this document, Iron Road Limited has relied on information provided by specialist consultants, government agencies, and other third parties. Iron Road Limited has reviewed all information to the best of its ability but does not take responsibility for the accuracy or completeness; and (b) this document has been prepared for information purposes only and, to the full extent permitted by law, Iron Road Limited, in respect of all persons other than the relevant government departments, makes no representation and gives no warranty or undertaking, express or implied, in respect to the information contained herein, and does not accept responsibility and is not liable for any loss or liability whatsoever arising as a result of any person acting or refraining from acting on any information contained within it. References A ADS 2014, Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary, viewed January 2014, http://www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au/adelaidemtloftyranges/coast-and-marine/dolphin-sanctuary. Ainslie, RC, Johnston, DA & Offler, EW 1989, Intertidal communities of Northern Spencer Gulf, South Australia, Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, Adelaide.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Malleefowl Management Plan
    Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Malleefowl Management Plan Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Malleefowl Management Plan Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Malleefowl Management Plan 12 February 2021 Version 5.0 Prepared by EBS Ecology for ElectraNet Document Control Revision No. Date issued Authors Reviewed by Date Reviewed Revision type 1 23/09/2020 J. Carpenter A. Derry 23/09/2020 Draft 2 09/10/2020 J. Carpenter ElectraNet 06/10/2020 Draft 3 13/10/2020 J. Carpenter ElectraNet 13/10/2020 FINAL 4 19/11/2020 E. Tremain ElectraNet 19/11/2020 FINAL 5 12/02/2021 J. Carpenter ElectraNet 12/02/2021 FINAL Distribution of Copies Revision No. Date issued Media Issued to 1 25/09/2020 Electronic Alecia Wright, ElectraNet 2 09/10/2020 Electronic Alecia Wright, ElectraNet 3 13/10/2020 Electronic Alecia Wright, ElectraNet 4 19/11/2020 Electronic Alecia Wright, ElectraNet 5 12/02/2021 Electronic Alecia Wright, ElectraNet EBS Ecology Project Number: E90106D COPYRIGHT: Use or copying of this document in whole or in part (including photographs) without the written permission of EBS Ecology’s client and EBS Ecology constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of EBS Ecology’s client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between EBS Ecology and its client. EBS Ecology accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. CITATION: EBS Ecology (2020) Eyre Peninsula Transmission Line Malleefowl Management Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • E-F-82-TEM-0026 1 (Report Template 2010)
    Central Eyre Iron Project Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 22: SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER 22 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT COPYRIGHT Copyright © Iron Road Limited, 2015 All rights reserved This document and any related documentation is protected by copyright owned by Iron Road Limited. The content of this document and any related documentation may only be copied and distributed for the purposes of section 46B of the Development Act, 1993 (SA) and otherwise with the prior written consent of Iron Road Limited. DISCLAIMER Iron Road Limited has taken all reasonable steps to review the information contained in this document and to ensure its accuracy as at the date of submission. Note that: (a) in writing this document, Iron Road Limited has relied on information provided by specialist consultants, government agencies, and other third parties. Iron Road Limited has reviewed all information to the best of its ability but does not take responsibility for the accuracy or completeness; and (b) this document has been prepared for information purposes only and, to the full extent permitted by law, Iron Road Limited, in respect of all persons other than the relevant government departments, makes no representation and gives no warranty or undertaking, express or implied, in respect to the information contained herein, and does not accept responsibility and is not liable for any loss or liability whatsoever arising as a result of any person acting or refraining from acting on any information contained within it. 22 Social Environment .............................................. 22-1 22.1 Applicable Legislation and Standards .................................................................................... 22-1 22.2 Impact Assessment Method .................................................................................................. 22-2 22.2.1 Study Areas ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eucalyptus Brachycalyx Gilja, Chindoo Mallee Classification Eucalyptus | Symphyomyrtus | Dumaria | Corrugatae Nomenclature
    Euclid - Online edition Eucalyptus brachycalyx Gilja, Chindoo mallee Classification Eucalyptus | Symphyomyrtus | Dumaria | Corrugatae Nomenclature Eucalyptus brachycalyx Blakely, Key Eucalypts 119 (1934). T: Murat & Denial Bays, S.A., Sept 1907, R.S.Rogers s.n.; holo: NSW; iso: AD, BM, CANB, MEL. E. incrassata var. protrusa J.Black, Fl. S. Australia 3: 421 (1926); E. brachycalyx var. protrusa (J.Black) H.Eichler, Suppl. J.M.Black's Fl. S. Australia 2nd edn 240 (1965). T: Ooldea and eastwards, S.A., collector not stated; herbarium of cited specimen not known to us. E. brachycalyx var. chindoo Blakely, Key Eucalypts 119 (1934). T: Minnipa, S.A., May 1916, W.J.Spafford s.n.; holo: NSW ; iso: AD. E. pleurocorys L.A.S.Johnson & K.D.Hill, Telopea 9: 277 (2001). T: Western Australia, Junana Rock, 121 km S of Balladonia roadhouse on track to Mt Ragged (33°23'S, 123°24'E), 20 Oct. 1983, K.D.Hill 240 & L.A.S.Johnson; holo: NSW; iso: CANB, PERTH. Description Small tree to 10 m tall, or mallee to 4 m tall. Forming a lignotuber. Bark of trees fibrous and fissured yellow-brown to dark grey on part or all of trunk with branches smooth grey, brown, orange or pinkish to white. In mallees stems are smooth except for a short stocking of rough bark; the upper stems and branches may be ribbony. Branchlets with oil glands in the pith. Juvenile growth (coppice or field seedlings to 50 cm): stems square in cross-section; juvenile leaves always petiolate, opposite for 3 to 6 pairs then alternate, lanceolate, 3.5–8.2 cm long, 1–3.8 cm wide, grey-green to blue-green (not waxy), becoming green, glossy when ca 1 m tall.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Mapping Vegetation Over Broad Spatial Extents: a Technique to Aid Land Management Across Jurisdictional Boundaries
    Landscape and Urban Planning 97 (2010) 296–305 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Landscape and Urban Planning journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/landurbplan A framework for mapping vegetation over broad spatial extents: A technique to aid land management across jurisdictional boundaries Angie Haslem a,b,∗, Kate E. Callister a, Sarah C. Avitabile a, Peter A. Griffioen c, Luke T. Kelly b, Dale G. Nimmo b, Lisa M. Spence-Bailey a, Rick S. Taylor a, Simon J. Watson b, Lauren Brown a, Andrew F. Bennett b, Michael F. Clarke a a Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia b School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia c Peter Griffioen Consulting, Ivanhoe, Victoria 3079, Australia article info abstract Article history: Mismatches in boundaries between natural ecosystems and land governance units often complicate an Received 2 October 2009 ecosystem approach to management and conservation. For example, information used to guide man- Received in revised form 25 June 2010 agement, such as vegetation maps, may not be available or consistent across entire ecosystems. This Accepted 5 July 2010 study was undertaken within a single biogeographic region (the Murray Mallee) spanning three Aus- Available online 7 August 2010 tralian states. Existing vegetation maps could not be used as vegetation classifications differed between states. Our aim was to describe and map ‘tree mallee’ vegetation consistently across a 104 000 km2 area Keywords: of this region. Hierarchical cluster analyses, incorporating floristic data from 713 sites, were employed Semi-arid ecosystems Mallee vegetation to identify distinct vegetation types. Neural network classification models were used to map these veg- Remote sensing etation types across the region, with additional data from 634 validation sites providing a measure of Neural network classification models map accuracy.
    [Show full text]