Bloomberg Politics GOP Unity Tracker
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CNN/TIME/ORC International Poll -- January 13 to 17, 2012 Likely Voter
FLORIDA SOUTH CAROLINA All interviews conducted by telephone among 391 likely voters in the Florida Republican primary and 505 likely voters in the South Carolina Republican primary by ORC International on January 13-17, 2012. Sampling error for Florida is +/-5 percentage points. Sampling error for South Carolina is +/-4.5 percentage points. FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18 AT 4 PM BASED ON INTERVIEWS WITH 391 REGISTERED REPUBLICANS WHO ARE LIKELY TO VOTE IN THE FLORIDA REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY -- SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 5 PERCENTAGE PTS. FLORIDA 1. If the Republican presidential primary were held today, please tell me which of the following people you would be most likely to support. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, Texas Governor Rick Perry, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, or former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum (RANDOM ORDER) And if that candidate decides not to run for president for any reason, who would be your second choice? Jan. 13-17 Nov. 29 – Dec. 6 2012 2011 Romney 43% 25% Santorum 19% 1% Gingrich 18% 48% Paul 9% 5% Perry 2% 3% Someone else (vol.) * 1% None/ No one (vol.) 3% 3% Bachmann N/A 3% Huntsman N/A 3% No opinion 6% 7% NOTE: In Jan. 13-17 poll, Jon Huntsman's name was included in the list of candidates through January 15. Results indicate the second choice of respondents who chose Huntsman as their first choice. In Nov. 29-Dec. 6 poll, Herman Cain's name was included in the list of candidates until December 3. -
The History of Redistricting in Georgia
GEORGIA LAW REVIEW(DO NOT DELETE) 11/6/2018 8:33 PM THE HISTORY OF REDISTRICTING IN GEORGIA Charles S. Bullock III* In his memoirs, Chief Justice Earl Warren singled out the redistricting cases as the most significant decisions of his tenure on the Court.1 A review of the changes redistricting introduced in Georgia supports Warren’s assessment. Not only have the obligations to equalize populations across districts and to do so in a racially fair manner transformed the makeup of the state’s collegial bodies, Georgia has provided the setting for multiple cases that have defined the requirements to be met when designing districts. Other than the very first adjustments that occurred in the 1960s, changes in Georgia plans had to secure approval from the federal government pursuant to the Voting Rights Act. Also, the first four decades of the Redistricting Revolution occurred with a Democratic legislature and governor in place. Not surprisingly, the partisans in control of redistricting sought to protect their own and as that became difficult they employed more extreme measures. When in the minority, Republicans had no chance to enact plans on their own. Beginning in the 1980s and peaking a decade later, Republicans joined forces with black Democrats to devise alternatives to the proposals of white Democrats. The biracial, bipartisan coalition never had sufficient numbers to enact its ideas. After striking out in the legislature, African-Americans appealed to the U.S. Attorney General alleging that the plans enacted were less favorable to black interests than alternatives * Charles S. Bullock, III is a University Professor of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia where he holds the Richard B. -
2012 Primary Election
Election Summary Report Date:03/20/12 Time:14:34:38 OFFICIAL PRIMARY ELECTION BALLOT Page:1 of 6 Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races OFFICIAL RESULTS Registered Voters 8806 - Cards Cast 2951 33.51% Num. Report Precinct 13 - Num. Reporting 13 100.00% Dem. Dist. Delegate-2 DEM Gre. US Senate GRE Total Total Number of Precincts 13 Number of Precincts 13 Precincts Reporting 13 100.0 % Precincts Reporting 13 100.0 % Times Counted 606/0 Times Counted 0/0 Total Votes 482 Total Votes 0 Barack Obama 482 100.00% Write-in Votes 0 N/A Rep. Delegate At-Large REP Lib. US Senate LIB Total Total Number of Precincts 13 Number of Precincts 13 Precincts Reporting 13 100.0 % Precincts Reporting 13 100.0 % Times Counted 2343/0 Times Counted 2/0 Total Votes 2221 Total Votes 0 Newt Gingrich 306 13.78% Write-in Votes 0 N/A Jon Huntsman 16 0.72% Ron Paul 281 12.65% Dem. US Congress DEM Rick Perry 29 1.31% Total Mitt Romney 617 27.78% Number of Precincts 13 Rick Santorum 972 43.76% Precincts Reporting 13 100.0 % Times Counted 606/0 Rep. District Delegates and Alternates REP Total Votes 510 Total Pat Lang 371 72.75% Number of Precincts 13 Scott Wharton 139 27.25% Precincts Reporting 13 100.0 % Times Counted 2343/0 Rep. US Congress REP Total Votes 2150 Total Newt Gingrich 331 15.40% Number of Precincts 13 Jon Huntsman 15 0.70% Precincts Reporting 13 100.0 % Ron Paul 300 13.95% Times Counted 2343/0 Rick Perry 40 1.86% Total Votes 1849 Mitt Romney 554 25.77% Charles Chope 229 12.39% Rick Santorum 910 42.33% Steve Stivers 1620 87.61% Dem. -
2011 Legislative and Congressional Districts
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2011 Minnesota House and Senate Membership ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! A Rep. Dan Fabian-(R) A Rep. Steve Gottwalt-(R) A Rep. Duane Quam-(R) A Rep. Sarah Anderson-(R) A Rep. John Kriesel-(R) B Rep. Deb Kiel-(R) B Rep. King Banaian-(R) B Rep. Kim Norton-(DFL) B Rep. John Benson-(DFL) B Rep. Denny McNamara-(R) Sen. LeRoy A. Stumpf-(DFL) Sen. John Pederson-(R) Sen. David Senjem-(R) Sen. Terri Bonoff-(DFL) Sen. Katie Sieben-(DFL) ! 1 15 29 43 57 A Rep. Kent Eken-(DFL) A Rep. Sondra Erickson-(R) A Rep. Tina Liebling-(DFL) A Rep. Steve Simon-(DFL) A Rep. Joe Mullery-(DFL) B Rep. David Hancock-(R) B Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer-(R) B Rep. Mike Benson-(R) B Rep. Ryan Winkler-(DFL) B Rep. Bobby Joe Champion-(DFL) Sen. Rod Skoe-(DFL) Sen. Dave Brown-(R) Sen. Carla Nelson-(R) Sen. Ron Latz-(DFL) Sen. Linda Higgins-(DFL) 2 16 30 44 58 ! A Rep. Tom Anzelc-(DFL) A Rep. Kurt Daudt-(R) A Rep. Gene Pelowski Jr.-(DFL) A Rep. Sandra Peterson-(DFL) A Rep. Diane Loeffler-(DFL) B Rep. Carolyn McElfatrick-(R) B Rep. Bob Barrett-(R) B Rep. Gregory Davids-(R) B Rep. Lyndon Carlson-(DFL) B Rep. Phyllis Kahn-(DFL) ! ! ! Sen. Tom Saxhaug-(DFL) Sen. Sean Nienow-(R) Sen. Jeremy Miller-(R) Sen. Ann H. Rest-(DFL) Sen. Lawrence Pogemiller-(DFL) 2011 Legislati! ve and Congressional Districts 3 17 31 45 59 A Rep. John Persell-(DFL) A Rep. Ron Shimanski-(R) A Rep. Joyce Peppin-(R) A Rep. Michael Nelson-(DFL) A Rep. -
114TH CONGRESS / First Session Available at Frcaction.Org/Scorecard
FRC ACTION VOTE SCORECARD 114TH CONGRESS / First Session Available at FRCAction.org/scorecard U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate Dear Voter and Friend of the Family, FRC Action presents our Vote Scorecard for the First Session of the 114th Congress. This online Scorecard contains a compilation of significant votes on federal legislation affecting faith, family, and freedom that FRC Action either supported or opposed. These recorded votes span the 2015 calendar year and include the greatest number of pro-life votes in history, after the U.S. House increased its Republican membership and the U.S. Senate was returned to Republican control. The year began with a bipartisan effort in the House to prohibit federal funds from being used to pay for abortion coverage under Obamacare. Congress successfully fought to restrict FDA approval of some forms of embryo-destructive research. The House, once again, passed legislation that would prevent late abortions on 5 month old pain-capable unborn children, and although the Senate was unable to pass the bill due to the 60 vote threshold, for the first time, a majority of Senators voted in favor of the bill. The public release of videos revealing Planned Parenthood’s organ harvesting practices renewed efforts to defund this scandal-ridden organization and redirect funding towards community health centers. In an unprecedented victory, the House and Senate passed a budget reconciliation bill, the Restoring Ameri- cans’ Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act, which would have eliminated a significant portion of Planned Parenthood’s funding—roughly 80%— and repealed key provisions of Obamacare. -
February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison
February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison Hayward Office of Congressional Ethics 425 3rd Street, SW Suite 1110 Washington, DC 20024 Dear Chairman Skaggs and Co-Chairwoman Hayward: We write to request that the Office of Congressional Ethics (“OCE”) investigate whether Representative Devin Nunes is receiving free legal services in violation of the Rules of the House of Representatives (“House rules”). Specifically, Representative Nunes retained an attorney who represents him in several defamation lawsuits in various courts where he seeks a total of nearly $1 billion in damages. House rules prohibit a Member from receiving free legal services, unless the Member establishes a Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”). According to the House Legislative Resource Center, Representative Nunes has not filed any of the required reports to establish an LEF. The relevant facts detailed below establish that the OCE Board should authorize an investigation of Representative Nunes. Representative Nunes’s overt involvement with the highly-publicized lawsuits threatens to establish a precedent that the Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”) regulations no longer apply to Members. Although Representative Nunes is entitled to legal representation and he may pursue any legal action to protect and defend his interests, he must comply with House rules. An OCE investigation will preserve Representative Nunes’s legal right to counsel while upholding well-established House rules and precedent. House Rules Prohibit Members from Receiving Discounted or Free Legal Services A Member of the House of Representatives “may not knowingly accept a gift” with limited exceptions.1 A “gift” is defined to include “a gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value. -
11055 Winnersprogram.Indd
3 4 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE JUDGES ...................................8 Internet/Electronic Media – The AAPC Pollie Awards for THE WINNERS ..............................12 Excellence in Digital Media – Brought to You by Yahoo! ..............25 Direct Mail ......................................12 Phones ...........................................34 Fundraising .....................................14 Field ...............................................36 Collateral ........................................15 Campaigns .....................................36 Newspaper .....................................22 Shoulda, Woulda, Coulda ...............36 Television – The AAPC-NCC Pollie Awards for Excellence Student ..........................................37 in Cable Advertising .......................23 ADVERTISER INDEX CBS Radio .................................................................................... 43 Producer’s Handy Dandy .............................................................. 31 Connell Donatelli .......................................................................... 40 Robert Kaplan Fund Raising, Inc. ................................................ 47 Corbis ............................................................................................ 11 Salesforce.com .............................................................................. 41 Executive Communications, Inc. .................................................. 42 Signature Media ............................................................................. -
Time Running out to Catch Coats 4 Rival GOP Senate Candidates Have Less Than a Month to Build ID and Drive an Issue
V 15, N29 Thursday, April 8, 2010 Time running out to catch Coats 4 rival GOP Senate candidates have less than a month to build ID and drive an issue By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – For a statewide candidate to drive up name identification in order to credibly deliver a message that could help win an election, even a primary, the price tag is somewhere in the $1 million range to purchase 3,000 to 4,000 gross rating points, sans the Chicago broadcast TV market. For that reason, with less than a month to go before the Republican U.S. Senate primary, the window is quickly closing on candi- dates not named Dan Coats. will “do statewide radio over the last two weeks” along with To date, none of the five candidates are running phone banking during that time span. any media or sending direct mail. None has demonstrated Asked how much support he would need to wrest any robust early FEC numbers or leaked head-to-head the nomination away from Coats, Hostettler drew on his polls showing that Coats is vulnerable. Coats is expected to 1994 primary victory in the 8th CD. “I’ll need anywhere begin his TV campaign next week. His perceived top chal- lenger, former Congressman John Hostettler, told HPI he Continued on Page 4 Marlin our Scott Brown? By CHRIS SAUTTER WASHINGTON - He’s never posed nude for Cos- mopolitan and his children are too young to appear on American Idol. But Indiana State Senator Marlin Stutzman believes he is positioning himself to be the Scott Brown in “There won’t be any balance left this year’s race to succeed Indiana’s retiring U.S. -
Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field
Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered -
Education Session Roars Back at Sine
V20, N32 Thursday, April 30, 2015 Education session roars back at sine die Pence priorities addressed in final hours of compromise By MATTHEW BUTLER INDIANAPOLIS – With Religious Free- dom Restoration Act and the Common Wage repeal settled, the “education session” came roaring back for the final days of the 2015 119th Indiana General Assembly. The House passed the budget 69- 30 literally minutes to midnight Wednesday evening. Only a short period before the Senate passed the biennial spending measure 40-9. The two super majorities passed legisla- Speaker Brian Bosma makes a point with House Minority Leader Scott Pelath in tion that addressed priorities Republican leader- the final hours of the Indiana General Assembly on Wednesday. (HPI Photo by ship and Gov. Mike Pence highlighted back in Mark Curry) January, such as increased funding for K-12 edu- terms of powers and responsibilities. Oversight of ISTEP, cation, a revised school funding formula, increased school most of the A-through-F grading system, and the state’s choice funding, and significant reforms to the State Board burgeoning school voucher program will be transferred to of Education (SBOE). the SBOE’s control and, starting in 2017, the superinten- Between SB1 and the budget, the superintendent of public instruction as an elected office is diminished in Continued on page 3 Pence in wonderland By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – On the Indiana Republican Party website under the “events” tab, the Marion County Rea- gan Dinner had been scheduled for tonight with Gov. Mike Pence on the bill as keynoter. It made perfect sense: The governor fresh off of his second “Gov. -
In the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 17-965 In the S upreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP , PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES , ET AL ., petitioners v. STATE OF HAWAII , ET AL ., respondents On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE EVAN MCMULLIN, ANNE APPLEBAUM, MAX BOOT, LINDA CHAVEZ, ELIOT COHEN, MINDY FINN, JULEANNA GLOVER, NORMAN ORNSTEIN, MICHAEL STEELE, CHARLIE SYKES, AND JERRY TAYLOR IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS R. REEVES ANDERSON JOHN B. BELLINGER , III ARNOLD & PORTER Counsel of Record KAYE SCHOLER LLP ELLIOTT C. MOGUL 370 Seventeenth St. KAITLIN KONKEL Suite 4400 ARNOLD & PORTER Denver, CO 80202 KAYE SCHOLER LLP (303) 863-1000 601 Mass. Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 942-5000 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Interest of Amici Curiae .............................................. 1 Introduction and Summary of Argument ................... 2 Argument ..................................................................... 4 I. EO-3 contravenes the prohibition on nationality-based discrimination that Congress, with support from almost all Republicans, adopted in 1965 ................................ 5 A. Congress intended to eliminate “all vestiges of discrimination against any national group” from our immigration system ............................................................... 6 1. Members of both parties, and Republicans in particular, strenuously repudiated the discriminatory policies that predated the 1965 Act ......................... 7 2. The 1965 Act rectified missteps in U.S. immigration policy ............................ 12 3. The principles underlying the 1965 Act are now fundamental to our national identity ........................................ 16 B. EO-3 runs afoul of Congress’s nondiscrimination guarantee ......................... 18 II. The President may not substitute his alternative policy judgments for Congress’s comprehensive statutory immigration scheme .. -
Congressional Scorecard 109Th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006
IRANIAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE Congressional Scorecard 109th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006 Please visit us on the web at www.iranianamericanpac.org About IAPAC IAPAC is a registered bipartisan political action committee that contributes to candidates for public office who are attuned to the domestic concerns of the Iranian American community. IAPAC focuses exclusively on domestic policy issues such as civil rights and immigration, and it encourages Americans of Iranian descent to actively participate in civic affairs. Mission • To support and promote the election of candidates for federal, state and local office, regardless of party affiliation, who are attuned to the domestic needs and issues of the Iranian American community • To support and promote Iranian American participation in civic affairs Issue Advocacy Civil Liberties: Balancing Civil Liberties and National Security in the Post-9/11 Era. Protecting our security and ensuring that the government does not infringe upon basic constitutional rights have long been important issues for civil libertarians and certain ethnic communities. IAPAC believes that our government must take the appropriate measures to protect our nation from further atrocities, but that it can do so without eliminating basic constitutional rights. Immigration: Immigration reform that is driven by proper national security concerns and remedies based on a fair and accurate appraisal of deficiencies in the immigration process, and not simply on national origin. Specifically, IAPAC advocates for a fair and measured execution of federal regulations governing the issuance of non-immigrant and immigrant visas for Iranian nationals. Congressional Scorecard The IAPAC 2005-2006 Congressional Scorecard rates members of Congress on votes and other positions taken in the House of Representatives and the Senate in the 109th Congress, which affect the domestic needs of the Iranian American community.