Story Master from Ashkenaz Stories As Sources of Historical Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Jewish Ideas Weekly www.jewishideasdaily.com September 14-28, 2012 Wednesday, September 19 the Talmud. nine, his family fled the impending Nazi In the 19th century scholars saw these doom and moved to Palestine. Fraenkel Story Master from Ashkenaz stories as sources of historical information. attended Rabbi Moshe Zvi Neriah’s yeshiva They believed that if they could clear away at Kfar Haroeh, the progenitor of Religious By Moshe Simon-Shoshan the layers of distortion and interpolation Zionist yeshivot in Israel today. There he Today, the use of literary theory and criti- that had been added over the years, the sto- studied Talmud with Rabbi Yitzhak Gilat, cism to study Midrash and Aggadah—non- ries would provide a front row seat at many who would become a leading scholar of hal- legal and interpretive rabbinic literature—is events in the rabbis’ lives and allow scholars akhic history at Bar Ilan University. a well-established and even popular en- to reconstruct the history of the rabbinic Fraenkel’s roots in the world of cultured deavor. Each year sees the publication of movement as a whole. Frankel completely German Orthodoxy informed much of his numerous books and articles seeking to rejected this idea. He argued that the sto- life, scholarship, and teaching. He was a understand rabbinic texts as literary and ries must first and foremost be treated as consummate Yekke, insistent on punctuali- cultural artifacts and many more academic, literary works. Moreover, the tools needed ty, decorum, and abiding by the rules. More religious, and popular courses and lectures to analyze the texts lay in the importantly, he held himself on similar themes. But this was not the theories and methods devel- and his students to the high- case when the young Talmud teacher Jonah oped and practiced in aca- est possible standards. It was Fraenkel first entered Hebrew University in demic departments of litera- not always easy or pleasant to the mid-1950s. In those days, the study of ture. be Fraenkel’s student. Midrash and Aggadah belonged to histori- Fraenkel developed a meth- For Fraenkel there was no ans and philologists. No one thought these od of formal analysis and distinction between academic texts should be viewed through the same “close reading” akin to the work and engagement in Tal- lens used to understand Shakespeare or practices of the New Critics mud Torah: His scholarship Dostoevsky. whose methods dominated was both an act of religious Perhaps more than any other individual, the Anglo-American critical devotion and a search for the Jonah Fraenkel, the Hebrew literature pro- scene in the mid-20th cen- truth as he defined it. In his fessor and Israel Prize laureate who died tury. For Fraenkel as for the readings of the Talmud, the last week at the age of 84, was the moving New Critics, the literary text Tannaim and Amoraim were, force behind this dramatic shift in the study is a closed hermeneutic structure in which like Fraenkel himself, non-mystical and fo- of Midrash and Aggadah in the academy artistic form and ideological content are cused on matters of ethics and interpersonal and the broader Jewish culture. With the inexorably intertwined. Fraenkel showed relations. In particular Fraenkel was skilled 1991 publication of his magnum opus, the that the “sage” stories were not artless anec- at drawing out the educational themes in two-volume Darkhei Ha-Aggadah VeHa- dotes but miniature works of narrative art rabbinic stories, arguing that many stories Midrash (The Ways of the Midrash and the that deserved the same careful attention of- concerned the teacher-student relationship. Aggadah), an encyclopedic guide to the ten lavished on more extended stories. He Fraenkel was himself a consummate teach- study of these texts, Fraenkel established particularly emphasized the way in which er; over the course of his long career he himself as master of all their forms and the rabbinic storytellers infused their works taught every level of student, from elemen- genres. Fraenkel made his greatest impact, with irony and paradox in order to shed tary school children to doctoral candidates. however, through more than three decades light on the fraught nature of interpersonal Fraenkel’s commitment to the lost heri- of studies culminating in his Sippurei Ha- relations and the human condition itself. tage of his childhood was even more pro- Agaddah—Ahdut shel Tokhen ve-Zurah Fraenkel was born in Munich in 1928 to nounced in his academic studies dealing (The Aggadic Narrative—Harmony of Form an Orthodox family in the best German tra- with the culture of Ashkenaz, the Jewish and Content), focusing on the single genre dition of Torah im Derekh Eretz. He grew up community that arose in the Rhine valley of “rabbinic sage” stories, which record the immersed in the study and practice of both and lasted a millennium until it was oblit- deeds and lives of the Tannaim and Amo- Torah and the best of Western culture and erated by the Nazis. Fraenkel’s first book, raim—the rabbis whose teachings make up scholarship. In 1937, when Fraenkel was based on his dissertation, was a monumen- Upcoming Features on Jewish Ideas Daily: strategic investment in Israel’s new war, krav maga, the Egyptian Jewish remnant, and much more! All on www.jewishideasdaily.com. Jewish Ideas Weekly, published by Jewish Ideas Daily, is a project of Bee.Ideas. To contact us, please email [email protected]. tal study of the methodology of Rashi, the Fraenkel also had a progressive side such as Daniel Boyarin and, later, Jeffery greatest scholar ever produced by the ye- to him. He was an early and enthusiastic Rubenstein, began to integrate Fraenkel’s shivot of western Germany. Fraenkel also adopter of Macintosh computers in an Is- insights into new and different approaches. devoted considerable energy, especially to- rael that is still heavily dominated by Win- Thus, Fraenkel’s work assumed a place in ward the end of his career, to the study of dows. More significantly, he was a strong the next generation of scholarship. Ashkenazic liturgy and piyyut (liturgical proponent of teaching Talmud to women Fraenkel himself remained steadfast in poetry). After the death his father-in-law, and girls. He personally his trained his his commitment to formalist, ahistorical Daniel Goldshmidt, the great scholar of lit- daughters in Talmud just as he did his sons. readings. However, my sense is that Fraen- urgy and a fellow product of Germany’s en- After the death of his wife Chava, he created kel well understood that as a teacher, his job lightened Orthodox community, Fraenkel a women’s Gemara class in her memory. was to help students reach a stage at which continued Goldschmidt’s project of creat- By the time I arrived at Hebrew Universi- they could develop ideas and approaches of ing critical editions of Makhzorim for festi- ty to study with Fraenkel in the early 1990s, their own. If only we, his students, could be vals, motivated both by his commitment to his rationalism and formalism had begun to blessed with his unstinting commitment to his father-in-law and to the collective his- look quaint. Yet it was around this time that Torah, scholarship, and the pursuit of truth, tory of Ashkenaz, of which he was among his work began to have perhaps its greatest which for him, of course, were all one and the last remnants. impact. A younger generation of scholars, the same. Thursday, September 20 es, such as the Heikhalot literature, which Rahamim remains in Orthodox prayer books are full of angelic ascensions and entreaties. with its unusual “theological hazard” warn- “I, and Not an Angel” ing sign, with some (like myself) skipping it, Yet the notion of turning to angels to others reciting it on purpose, and many, alas, By Shlomo M. Brody supplicate on our behalf ruffled many theo- unknowingly mumbling their way through “Warning: The Following Prayer May Be logical feathers in the medieval era. Mai- the theological minefield. Dangerous to Your Spiritual Health. Recite monides, in the fifth of his 13 principal with Caution, and Only with the Proper dogmas of Judaism, asserts that only God I have always wondered why so many Intention.” should be worshiped and praised. “Do not,” people, scholars and laypeople alike, con- he continues, “seize upon intermediaries in tinue to embrace this prayer, to the point at When was the last time you saw this kind order to reach Him but direct your thoughts which it has recently been popularized in of warning in a prayer book? Yet in most toward Him, may He be exalted, and turn a striking song by the Hasidic singer Mor- S’lihot prayer books, including the one that away from that which is oth- dechai Ben David. Leaving is most popular in the Israeli market, that is er than He.” Some scholars, aside the many halakhic and the message (OK, my translation is a bit of including Nahmandies and theological questions, do you a dramatic paraphrase) that actually accom- the Maharal of Prague, tried really want to roll the dice by panies one of the hymns. to ban such prayers, even as participating in an arguably other prominent scholars de- heretical rite while the Books The hymn in question is known by its fended their continued recita- of Judgment are open? Af- first words,Makhnisei Rahamim or “Ushers tion. Debates on the question ter all, there is no shortage of of Mercy.” It is the best known of the many continued into the early mod- prayers to recite; why place intercessory prayers, composed for this time ern period, with some schol- your bets on one that Mai- of the year, which call upon angels to deliver ars trying to placate both sides monides thinks can lose you our supplications to God: by suggesting grammatical your place in the World to emendations or apologetic Come? O you who usher in [pleas for] mercy, interpretations to make the may you usher in our [plea for] mercy, hymns theologically acceptable.