DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing Rotterdam's Skyline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Developing Rotterdam's Skyline ctbuh.org/papers Title: Developing Rotterdam’s Skyline Authors: Frank van der Hoeven, Associate Professor, Delft University of Technology Steffen Nijhuis, Associate Professor, Delft University of Technology Subject: Urban Design Keyword: Urban Planning Publication Date: 2012 Original Publication: CTBUH Journal, 2012 Issue II Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Frank van der Hoeven; Steffen Nijhuis Developing Rotterdam’s Skyline “The framework as presented carries the potential to underpin a city’s guidance on tall building development. This framework presents the context of a tall building design, providing a Frank van der Hoeven Steffen Nijhuis more balanced evaluation of a design proposal Authors Frank van der Hoeven, Associate Professor compared to studies that focus solely on Steffen Nijhuis, Assistant Professor individual tall buildings.” Delft University of Technology Faculty of Architecture Julianalaan 134 The planning and construction of tall buildings is often controversial, polarizing the public 2628 BL Delft The Netherlands debate on architecture and urban life. In many cases the emotional discourse focuses on t: +31 15 278 9805 aesthetics and view corridors, more than city planning or economics. This paper introduces a e: [email protected] framework that analyzes the visual impact a developing skyline has on a city and its e: [email protected] www.graduateschool.abe.tudelft.nl surrounding region, using Rotterdam as a case study. By studying the height and completion year, identifying the tall building cluster as it is perceived visually and conducting a GISc- Frank van der Hoeven based visibility analysis, the framework provides context to tall building designs. The results Prof. van der Hoeven is an associate professor of urban make the assessment of individual projects more scientific and balanced, removing many of design at the Faculty of Architecture at Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands. He conducted his PhD the emotional elements that often enter into the discussions. research in the field of underground space technology and multifunctional and intensive land-use. The core of his work deals with urban design issues related to Introduction Concerns about the appropriateness of tall mixed-use development: transit-oriented Research on the visual impact of tall buildings buildings in the urban environment, the development, urban greenhouse horticulture, the use quality of the architecture and the impact on of underground space, high-rise urban areas and has the potential to make or break a tall climate change. Currently he combines his associate building proposal. In the UK, debates over the local real estate markets is increasingly professorship in urban design with the position of reflected in municipal and metropolitan Director of Research of the Faculty of Architecture. appropriateness of projects in London and Liverpool are primarily focused on view policymaking. Prominent cities with a Steffen Nijhuis corridors, with UNESCO threatening to longstanding tradition of urban management, Prof. Nijhuis is an assistant professor of landscape remove world heritage designations from building regulations and zoning plans often architecture at Delft University of Technology, The feel the need for additional instruments to Netherlands. His PhD research, entitled “Landscape historic complexes if the new developments Architecture and GIS,” focuses on the application of damage their aesthetic impact (see Debating control the development of what is described geographic information science in landscape by McNeill as “an extremely complex spatial architectonic research and design. The core of his work Tall, page 5). deals with theories, methods and techniques in the phenomenon” (McNeill, 2005). Scientific field of landscape architecture and urban design, visual landscape assessment and visual knowledge representation. He is leader of the architecture and landscape research program, series editor of RiUS and advisor to governmental and regional authorities in the Netherlands. Figure 1. Rotterdam as a prominent west European tall building city 32 | Developing Rotterdam’s Skyline CTBUH Journal | 2012 Issue II literature, however, often neglects the western European cities possess this type of Rotterdam’s semi-official tall building history substantial impact skyscrapers and their visual mature skyline: London, Paris, Frankfurt, and portrays a 100-year prelude from the late 19th footprint can have on urban life. “The Rotterdam. century, with the completion of the 42-meter significance of these buildings – in terms of The leading position of Rotterdam is Witte Huis, built in 1898, to the so-called “first height, levels of human occupancy, aesthetic furthermore underscored by DEGW’s report wave” of high buildings in the mid-1980s. impact and popular representation and use on London’s Skyline, Views, and High Buildings Prominent city planners suggest that the city – is in need of careful geographical commissioned by the Greater London at the turn of the century was on the verge of interpretation.” (McNeill 2005) Authority (DEGW 2002). The London policy a “second wave” of tall buildings, which would In 2007 the Netherlands Institute for Spatial document uses the same four European cities feature supertall buildings (Maandag 2001). Research (Lörzing et al. 2007) published an to compare established European practices of However, this tale cannot be underpinned investigation on the visibility of the proposed tall buildings policymaking: London, Paris, with facts. Neither the height nor the location Belle van Zuylen tower. At 262 meters the Frankfurt, and Rotterdam. of the high buildings dating from this early Belle van Zuylen tower would become period relate to the municipal policy on The tall building policy document that high-rises. It was only in the 1970s that the Holland’s tallest residential building and the emerged in the Netherlands is called centerpiece of Leidsche Rijn, the new city current tall building area in the middle of the hoogbouwbeleid or hoogbouwvisie. The Dutch city center began to emerge. district, west of Utrecht. But the Netherlands policies resemble a number of policy Institute for Spatial Research analysis showed documents recently produced in the United Essential data on tall buildings can be easily that the Belle van Zuylen could be seen from Kingdom and Germany. presented by means of a scatter plot. In the most of the “Green Heart,” the semi-rural case of Rotterdam, the building height and region enclosed by the cities of Rotterdam, Height regulation is a key component of all the year of completion were plotted, Amsterdam, The Hague and Utrecht. The these tall building policies. Height also including the primary use of such buildings. report was the last blow for the proposed translates into visibility. The beauty of Rotterdam’s scatter plot lies in development – construction was cancelled the clear patterns that emerge. In her book soon after the release of the report (Lörzing A modern history Form Follows Finance, Carol Willis explains 2011). Over the years, the city of Rotterdam has that the end of a tall building wave is typically The Belle van Zuylen case is a fine example of carefully cultivated an image as a “city of marked by the construction of the “tallest using research for tactical purposes through architecture.” But “historic” architecture is not building so far.” If we would consider these the selective presentation of findings. The Rotterdam’s strong point. Few buildings were “tallest buildings so far” as anomalies and study did not present the Belle van Zuylen in left standing after the bombing and fire of disregard them, the development of the its true context. The joint visual impact of all May 1940. The few buildings that survived Rotterdam tall building cluster is characterized the tall buildings in the region on the Green were relatively modern buildings from the by a remarkable continuity. However, if Carol Heart was not considered, nor how much that 1920s and 1930s. The city had to rebuild its Willis’ insights are applicable to Rotterdam, impact would change as a result of the center from scratch. Planners seized this then the year in which the tallest building so construction of the Belle van Zuylen. If the opportunity to experiment with architecture far was completed could be used as the study had included these elements, it may not and urbanism, which is why the Rotterdam breaking points between tall building waves. have caused such stir. In fact, a nearby city center now contains numerous Three such buildings stand out in Rotterdam: television tower, the 367-meter monuments and icons from the modern and the Faculty of Medicine of the Erasmus Gerbrandytoren tower, built 42 years earlier, modernist period, sometimes referred to as University, also known as Hoboken (1969, 112 dominates the visual impact of the area. “reconstruction architecture.” meters), the Delftse Poort (1991, 93 and 151 meters) and the Maastoren (2009, 165 meters). Discussions about the appropriateness of tall A framework that helps to picture the context If the tall building history of Rotterdam is buildings surfaced from time to time, but of a proposed tall building can potentially indeed characterized by waves, then these never reached the emotional levels neutralize public and political debates that so buildings are
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bijlage 1: Lijst Hoogbouw 70 Meter En Hoger Verdie- Nr
    Bijlage 1: Lijst hoogbouw 70 meter en hoger Verdie- Nr. Naam Stad Functie Bouwjaar pingen Hoogte 1 Montevideo Rotterdam Wonen 2005 43 152 2 Delftse Poort Rotterdam Kantoor 1991 41 151 3 Hoftoren Den Haag Kantoor 2003 29 142 4 Westpoint Tilburg Wonen 2004 48 142 5 Rembrandt Toren Amsterdam Kantoor 1995 35 135 6 Het Strijkijzer Den Haag Wonen 2008 41 132 7 Millennium Rotterdam Kantoor 2000 34 131 8 The Red Apple Rotterdam Wonen 2008 38 127 9 World Port Center Rotterdam Kantoor 2001 32 123 10 Mondriaan Toren Amsterdam Kantoor 2002 31 123 11 Achmea Leeuwarden Kantoor 2002 28 115 12 Erasmus Medisch Centrum Rotterdam Onderwijs 1968 26 112 13 Prinsenhof Den Haag Kantoor 2005 25 109 14 Waterstadtoren Rotterdam Wonen 2004 36 109 15 Fortis Bank Blaak Rotterdam Kantoor 1996 28 107 16 Weenatoren Rotterdam Wonen 1990 32 106 17 Coopvaert Rotterdam Wonen 2006 29 106 18 World Trade Center Tower 6 Amsterdam Kantoor 2004 27 105 19 ABN AMRO hoofdkantoor Amsterdam Kantoor 1999 24 105 20 De Admirant Eindhoven Wonen 2006 31 105 21 Symphony I Amsterdam Wonen 2008 29 105 22 Weenacenter Rotterdam Wonen 1990 32 104 23 Castalia Den Haag Kantoor 1998 20 104 24 Hoge Heren I Rotterdam Wonen 2000 34 102 25 Hoge Heren II Rotterdam Wonen 2000 34 102 26 Schielandtoren Rotterdam Wonen 1996 32 101 27 Provinciehuis Noord Brabant Den Bosch Kantoor 1971 23 101 28 De Stadsheer Tilburg Wonen 2007 31 101 29 Porthos Eindhoven Wonen 2006 31 101 30 Mahler 4 Amsterdam Kantoor 2005 25 100 31 Oosterbaken Hoogvliet Wonen 2006 32 99 32 Pegasus Rotterdam Wonen 2002 31 98 33 Millennium
    [Show full text]
  • Despite the Current Recession in the Dutch Building Industry, Construction
    Rotterdam, CENTRAAL STATION (****– 2013) Architect: Team CS met Maarten Struijs 1 Address: Stationsplein 1 ZEECONTAINER RESTAURANT (2005) 15 Architect: Bijvoet architectuur & Stadsontwerp large and small Address: Loods Celebes 101 HOGE HEREN (2005) RED APPLE (2009) Architect: Wiel Arets Architects Address: Gedempte Zalmhaven 179 Despite the current recession in the Dutch building industry, Architect: KCAP Architects & Planners 10 construction – of both the large-scale high-rise projects typical 6 Address: Wijnbrugstraat 200 of this city and more modest ‘infill’ architecture – continues apace in Rotterdam. ACHTERHAVEN (2011) THE NETHERLANDS — TEXT: Emiel Lamers, photography: Sonia Mangiapane, Illustration: Loulou&Tummie Architect: Studio Sputnik 16 Address: Achterhaven otterdam is one of the few old cities line. Since the construction of the Erasmus No one arriving in Rotterdam by train can is regarded as a monument of the post-war n der Hoek in Europe characterized by massive Bridge in 1996, the centre has expanded miss the massive reconstruction of Centraal reconstruction of the city. If all goes according A rd v KUNSTHAL (1992) high-rise in the centre of the city. In across the river to the poorer, southern part of Station (1). The original station hall de- to plan, it will be integrated with the new mu- A R All Architect: Rem Koolhaas, Fumi Hoshino OMA SCHIEBLOCK (2011) one night of heavy bombing on 14 May 1940, the city where two new districts, Kop van Zuid signed by Sybold van Ravesteyn in 1957, has nicipal offices (4), scheduled to open here in Address: Westzeedijk 341 CULTUURCENTRUM WORM (2011) 11 at the beginning of World War II, Rotterdam and Wilhelminapier, now boast some impres- made way for a much more spacious, raked March 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA HPC 2017 Rotterdam City Brochure
    12th IEA HEAT PUMP CONFERENCE 2017 Rotterdam 12TH IEA HEAT PUMP CONFERENCE WORLD TRADE CENTER ROTTERDAM 15 - 18 MAY 2017 ‘We’re from Rotterdam - we’ll keep going!’ appeared on a placard just days after by combining heat pumps with thermal the city was devastated by the WWII aerial bombings on 14 May 1940. This motto energy storage (ATES) in principal in many ways typifies the resolute character of Rotterdam and its inhabitants. In always in combination with district the war’s aftermath, a buzzing metropolis was built literally on the post-blitz ruins, heating. including a heating-network throughout the center. Sustainability is an important element In Rotterdam today, immigrants from over 170 different nations help create the city’s of Rotterdam’s vision. The thermal open and cosmopolitan atmosphere. The resolute perseverance of Rotterdam’s energy plan for the underground makes citizens still defines the city’s continual push for innovation at all levels of business, room for heat pump projects. Room for government and community life. innovation, but also literally: room to prevent interference between different Rotterdam is synonymous with innovation, whether it is in architecture, the creative sector thermal storage projects. or the port. Home to Europe’s largest port, Rotterdam is often a trendsetter. Just think of the Maasvlakte II project, extending the port into the sea, and of the architectural tours Rotterdam shows that having district de force in the Kop van Zuid district. heating does not exclude heat pumps nor energy storage, having this base The city on the Maas river is home to the offices of many of the world’s leading load opens opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Guía-8-G2004-.Nl-.De-.Dk-.Se-.No .Pdf
    PAÍSES BAJOS (NEDERLANDS) Breda 3 Rotterdam. 6 ne Delft 19 La Haya (Den Haag) 20 Amsterdam 27 Almere 54 Utrecht 56 Hilversum 60 Arnheim 63 Ede 64 Otterloo 64 Maastricht 65 Eindhoven 67 ALEMANIA (DEUTSCHLAND) Duisburg 71 Essen. 71 de Munster 73 Osnabrück 73 Hannover 74 Wolfsburg 74 Hamburg 75 DINAMARCA (DanmaRK) Copenague (Kovenhavn) 83 Rødrove. 95 dk Aarhus 96 SUECIA (SVERIGE) Malmö 98 Gotemburgo (Göteborg). 99 se Estocolmo (stockholm) 101 NORUEGA (NORGE) Oslo 110 Hamar. 115 no Fjærland 116 Alvdal 116 1 .ne 2 breda La antigua base militar Chassé, situada en el centro de Breda, ha sido recuperada para la ciudad. El plan director trazado por OMA establece una batería de intervenciones, edificios residenciales, edificios públicos, aparcamien- tos, espacios públicos y una serie de funciones adicionales que generan un nuevo paisaje dentro del contexto urbano. El diseño se basa en el modelo de campus universitario, como disparador para generar una vida urbana abierta. Esto se debe a las condiciones particulares del sitio: un espacio vacío en el centro de la compacta ciudad de Breda, pero que también forma parte de un bolsón verde que sirve de recueste a la ciudad y que está definido por tres parques: el parque de Deportes, el parque Wilhemina y el parque Brabant. El espacio verde funciona como unificador de los diversos edificios que se erigen espaciados en el sitio. Además del plan, OMA proyecto uno de los bloques de viviendas y el aparcamiento. Este conjunto se resuelve mediante un borde de manzana macizo, que se conforma a partir del encastre y apilamiento de tres bloques, donde se desarrollan las viviendas y un volumen central vacío.
    [Show full text]
  • Defensie- En Oorlogsschade in Kaart Gebracht (1939-1945)
    Defensie- en oorlogsschade IN KAART GEBRACHT (1939-1945) Elisabeth van Blankenstein MEI 2006/ZEIST In opdracht van het Projectteam Wederopbouw van de Rijksdienst voor de Monumentenzorg 2 Inhoudsopgave Inhoudsopgave 3 Ten geleide 5 Inleiding 7 A. Toelichting gebruikte bronnen 9 B. Voorkomende begrippen en termen 11 Deel 1 13 Algemene overzichten defensie-, oorlogsgeweld- en bezettingschade 1) Woningen 14 2) Boerderijen 18 3) Schadecijfers woningen, boerderijen, bedrijven, kerken, scholen, enzovoort 22 4) Spoorweggebouwen 24 5) Spoor- en verkeersbruggen 25 6) Vaarwegen, sluizen, stuwen en havens 29 7) Molens 31 8) Bossen 33 9) Schade door inundaties 35 10) Schade door Duitse V-wapens 41 11) Schadeoverzichten per gemeente 42 12) Stagnerende woningbouw en huisvestingsproblematiek 1940 - 1945 49 13) Industriële schade door leegroof en verwoesting 50 14) Omvang totale oorlogsschade in guldens 51 Deel 2 53 Alfabetisch overzicht van defensie-, oorlogs en bezettingsschade in provincies, regio’s, steden en dorpen in Nederland Bijlage 1 Chronologisch overzicht van luchtaanvallen op Nederland 1940-1945 219 Colofon 308 3 4 Ten geleide In 2002 werd door het Projectteam Wederopbouw van de Rijksdienst voor de Monumentenzorg (RDMZ) een eerste aanzet gegeven tot een onderzoek naar de oorlogsschade in het buitengebied. Het uiteindelijke doel was het opstellen van een kaart van Nederland met de belangrijkste wederopgebouwde en heringerichte gebieden van Nederland. Belangrijkste (eerste) bron voor het verkennend onderzoek was uiteraard Een geruisloze doorbraak. De ge- schiedenis van architectuur en stedebouw tijdens de bezetting en wederopbouw van Nederland (1995) onder redactie van Koos Bosma en Cor Wagenaar. Tijdens het verkennend onderzoek door stagiaire Suzanne de Laat bleek dat diverse archieven niet bij elkaar aansloten, met betrekking tot oorlogsschade slecht ontsloten waren, verschillende cijfers hanteerden en niet altijd eenduidig waren.
    [Show full text]
  • ROTTERDAM SPECIAL September 2015 a City Re-Inventing Itself This Publication This Document Was Published in September 2015
    ROTTERDAM SPECIAL September 2015 A city re-inventing itself This publication This document was published in September 2015. The data used in the charts and tables is the latest available at the time of going to press. Sources are included for all the charts. We have used a standard set of notes and abbreviations throughout the document. September 2015 Actions speak louder than words Rotterdam can easily be regarded as the most dynamic city of the Netherlands. It is the only Dutch city with a true skyline. A skyline that will only get denser in CONTENTS the years to come as more and more high-rise buildings are delivered. It is a city where architecture is used to enhance the quality of life and to revive parts of the city which were lagging behind. It is a city where institutional, top-down schemes METROPOLITAN AREA go well together with smaller, local and often private contributions. A city where page 04 the slogan “actions speak louder than words” is central in its thinking. And thus a city that continuously invests in itself, not in order to compete with other cities, but simply because it has to; it is in its DNA. POPULATION Savills hope you will find valuable information in this report. Information which page 06 might make you consider investing in Rotterdam and become part of this dynamic city. ECONOMY page 08 EDUCATION page 10 RESIDENTIAL MARKET page 12 OFFICE MARKET page 14 RETAIL page 16 HOTEL page 18 INVESTORS IN ROTTERDAM page 20 WORLD CITY RANKINGS page 22 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE page 24 savills.com/research 03 Rotterdam Special Metropolitan Area Rotterdam, which has the largest port in Europe, is an international centre of transport and industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban and Cultural Climate of Rotterdam Changed Radically Between 1970 and 2000. Opinions Differ About What the Most Importa
    The urban and cultural climate of Rotterdam changed radically between 1970 and 2000. Opinions differ about what the most important changes were, and when they occurred. Imagine a Metropolis shows that it was first and foremost a new perspective on Rotterdam that stimulated the development of the city during this period. If the Rotterdam of 1970 was still a city with an identity crisis that wanted to be small rather than large and cosy rather than commercial, by 2000 Rotterdam had the image of the most metropolitan of all Dutch cities. Artists and other cultural practitioners – a group these days termed the ‘creative class’ – were the first to advance this metropolitan vision, thereby paving the way for the New Rotterdam that would begin to take concrete shape at the end of the 1980s. Imagine a Metropolis goes on to show that this New Rotterdam is returning to its nineteenth-century identity and the developments of the inter-war years and the period of post-war reconstruction. For Nina and Maria IMAGINE A METROPOLIS ROTTERDAM’S CREATIVE CLASS, 1970-2000 PATRICIA VAN ULZEN 010 Publishers, Rotterdam 2007 This publication was produced in association with Stichting Kunstpublicaties Rotterdam. On February 2, 2007, it was defended as a Ph.D. thesis at the Erasmus University, Rotterdam. The thesis supervisor was Prof. Dr. Marlite Halbertsma. The research and this book were both made possible by the generous support of the Faculty of History and Arts at the Erasmus University Rotterdam, G.Ph. Verhagen-Stichting, Stichting Kunstpublicaties Rotterdam, J.E. Jurriaanse Stichting, Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds Zuid-Holland and the Netherlands Architecture Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoogbouw in De Ruimte
    Master Thesis Economische Geografie Hoogbouw in de Ruimte Rinse Gorter Augustus 2008 Studentnr: 1300083 Begeleider: Prof. Dr. P.H. Pellenbarg Opleiding: Economische geografie 2 -2- Voorwoord Voor u ligt het onderzoek dat ik gedaan heb ter afronding van de masteropleiding Economische Geografie aan de RijksUniversiteit te Groningen. In een paar zinnen voorafgaande aan het werkelijke onderzoek wil ik graag alle mensen in mijn omgeving bedanken voor hun bijdrage, hulp en steun. In het bijzonder wil ik mijn vader bedanken voor zijn op- en aanmerkingen die mij vaak verder hielpen in het schrijfproces. Daarnaast wil ik Prof. Dr. P.H. Pellenbarg bedanken die mij begeleid heeft bij het schrijven van mijn masterthesis. Verder wil ik Dhr. A. Edzes bedanken voor het vervullen van de taak als tweede begeleider. Natuurlijk zijn ook vrienden en andere familieleden onmisbaar geweest bij het tot stand komen van dit eindproduct. Rinse Gorter, 10 juli 2008 3 -3- Abstract This thesis, written in the finalizing stage of the master’s degree in Economic Geography at the RijksUniversiteit Groningen, is about high-rise buildings in the Netherlands. The title ‘Hoogbouw in de Ruimte’ would literally be translated in English as ‘High-rise buildings in Space’ but (because mankind is still not able to build on the moon) should be read as ‘high- rise buildings and their environment’. High-rise buildings in the Netherlands are starting to play an increased role in Dutch municipal policy. Because of the lack in national high rise building policy, most of the major cities have developed their own policy on skyscrapers. When we look at the history of the skyscraper in the Netherlands, there has been a shift from public development before the 1980’s to private development after 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Onderzoeksrapport Naar Een Levendige Binnenstad
    NAAR EEN LEVENDIGE BINNENSTAD Loopstromen van de Rotterdamse Hoogbouwbewoner Veldacademie NAAR EEN LEVENDIGE BINNENSTAD Loopstromen van de Rotterdamse Hoogbouwbewoner Binnen de Veldacademie werken TU-Delft (Faculteit der Bouwkunde), Gemeente Rotterdam (Dienst Stadsontwikkeling, Bureau Frontlijn), Erasmus Medisch Centrum (afdeling Maatschappelijke Gezondheidszorg), Hogeschool van Amsterdam, (Lectoraat Meervoudig Intensief Duurzaam Ruimtegebruik), en University of Michigan (Faculty of Architecture) samen aan de uitvoering van dit onderzoek. Veldacademie Bureau Frontlijn SAMENVATTING Het hoogbouwbewoners-onderzoek verkent gemengde straten vinden we de echte bewoners- hoe bewoners van woontorens in het centrum hotspots. De aanwezige supermarkten en de van Rotterdam de binnenstad gebruiken wekelijkse markt op de Binnenrotte behoren tot en waarderen. Doel is om een beter inzicht de meest gebruikte plekken in het centrum. te krijgen in het gebruik van de binnenstad op verschillende tijdstippen en met De 10 onderzochte binnenstedelijke woontorens verschillende modaliteiten. Voor het eerst is hebben een balans van huur- en koopwoningen het verplaatsingsgedrag van meer dan vijftig en huisvesten bewoners met hoofdzakelijk een bewoners in de Rotterdamse binnenstad in ‘rode’ of ‘blauwe’ leefstijl. Het lijkt erop dat het tien woontorens een week lang gemeten met verplaatsingsgedrag van de bewoners met een GPS-apparatuur. Naast interessante gegevens rode of blauwe leefstijl niet veel verschilt. De over de afgelegde route heeft het onderzoek bewoners van rode torens gaan mogelijk te voet ook vast kunnen leggen met welk doel men op iets verder de binnenstad in en gebruiken meer pad ging. Dmv een uitgebreide enquête is ook verschillende plekken. Het verplaatsingsgedrag getracht De waardering van de binnenstad en van torenbewoners hangt vooral samen met de wensen van bewoners aanvullend in kaart te voorzieningen die aanwezig zijn in- en dicht bij brengen.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoogbouwbeleid Lessen Tien Hoogbouw? Waarom De Discussie
    ONDER DE BOMEN HOLLANDSE STAD - Ambities van de stad - Een studie naar Nederlandse hoogbouwcultuur In Nederland zijn hoge gebouwen steeds vaker onderwerp van discussie. De afgelopen jaren worden gestaag steeds meer hoogbouwprojecten gerealiseerd. Soms vanuit een duidelijke wens in de stad, maar net zo vaak zonder stedelijk doel. Veel gemeentes zijn op zoek naar een rode draad en de meerwaarde van hoogbouw voor hun stad. Wat is goede hoogbouw en wat kan het betekenen? Deze publicatie bekijkt het Nederlandse hoogbouwlandschap anno 2008. Wat kan hoogbouw betekenen voor de stad? Welke HOOG aspecten verdienen meer aandacht bij de realisatie van een toren? Wat zijn essentiële randvoorwaarden voor een geslaagd project? En wat is de rol en het belang van de gemeente, architect, ontwikkelaar, belegger en burger in het complexe speelveld van hoogbouw in een overlegcultuur? BOUW ISBN 978-90-809293-4-0 Inhoudsopgave Voorwoord Tien Lessen 6 Hoge gebouwen raken steeds meer ingeburgerd in Waarom Hoogbouw? 8 het Nederlandse landschap. Vroeger was hoogbouw De Discussie 10 voorbehouden aan de centra van de grote steden met soms Tilburg een 'verdwaalde' toren aan de snelweg of langs de kust. Arnhem Heerlen Sinds halverwege de jaren ‘80 lijkt hoogbouw echter Belle van Zuylen definitief doorgebroken. Rotterdam profileert zich, sinds de ontwikkeling van het Weena, als hoogbouwstad. Den Haag en Amsterdam ontwikkelen hoogstedelijke Het Perspectief 16 stationsomgevingen rond hun HSL-stations. In Utrecht Hoogbouw in de wereld ontspint zich een discussie over de bouw van de Belle van Hoogbouw in Nederland Zuylen, een toren van 260 meter hoog aan de A2. Ook in Hoogtepunten andere steden zoals Tilburg, Eindhoven en Maassluis zijn Definities inmiddels hoogbouwprojecten gerealiseerd.
    [Show full text]
  • Rich Cities with Poor People; Waterfront Regeneration in the Netherlands and Scotland -- Utrecht 2010: Knag/Faculteit Geowetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht
    Rich cities with poor people Nederlandse Geografische Studies / Netherlands Geographical Studies Redactie / Editorial Board Drs. J.G. Borchert (Editor in Chief ) Prof. Dr. J.M.M. van Amersfoort Dr. P.C.J. Druijven Prof. Dr. A.O. Kouwenhoven Prof. Dr. H. Scholten Plaatselijke Redacteuren / Local Editors Dr. R. van Melik, Faculteit Geowetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht Dr. D.H. Drenth, Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen Dr. P.C.J. Druijven, Faculteit der Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Dr. L. van der Laan, Economisch-Geografisch Instituut Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Dr. J.A. van der Schee, Centrum voor Educatieve Geografie Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Dr. F. Thissen, Afdeling Geografie, Planologie en Internationale Ontwikkelingsstudies Universiteit van Amsterdam Redactie-Adviseurs / Editorial Advisory Board Prof. Dr. G.J. Ashworth, Prof. Dr. P.G.E.F. Augustinus, Prof. Dr. G.J. Borger, Prof. Dr. K. Bouwer, Prof. Dr. J. Buursink, Prof. Dr. G.A. Hoekveld, Dr. A.C. Imeson, Prof. Dr. J.M.G. Kleinpenning, Dr. W.J. Meester, Prof. Dr. F.J. Ormeling, Prof. Dr. H.F.L. Ottens, Dr. J. Sevink, Dr. W.F. Sleegers, T.Z. Smit, Drs. P.J.M. van Steen, Dr. J.J. Sterkenburg, Drs. H.A.W. van Vianen, Prof. Dr. J. van Weesep ISSN 0169-4839 Netherlands Geographical Studies 391 Rich cities with poor people Waterfront regeneration in the Netherlands and Scotland Brian Doucet Utrecht 2010 Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap Faculteit Geowetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht This publication has been submitted as a PhD thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor (PhD) at Utrecht University.
    [Show full text]
  • High Rise: Our Expertise
    HIGH-RISE OUR EXPERTISE 15,000 110 EMPLOYEES WORLDWIDE YEARS’ EXPERIENCE 70+ 5 NATIONALITIES CONTINENTS N°69 2 billion+ INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTOR OF SALES ENR TOP 250 RANKING Cover picture: Burj Khalifa, Dubai, UAE Picture below: New Orleans, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 02 BESIX GROUP EXCELLING IN CREATING SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS FOR A BETTER WORLD BESIX is a leading Belgian business group, operating on BESIX is an international reference in the building, maritime five continents in construction, real estate development works, environment, sports and leisure facilities, industrial and concessions. buildings, road, rail, port and airport sectors. The Group is currently working on dozens of projects in around Its iconic achievements include Dubai’s Burj Khalifa, the 25 countries on five continents. world’s tallest tower; the Grand Egyptian Museum on the Giza pyramids plateau; the Ferrari World Leisure Center in Abu Its policy of sector diversification is also bearing fruit. Dhabi, the Carpe Diem building in Paris’s La Défense district; Its Concessions & Assets activities have taken off in recent the Al Wakrah Stadium, built for the FIFA World Cup Qatar years. BESIX’s expertise allows it to handle projects from 2022; and the Jebel Ali water treatment plant, an ongoing financial structuring to design and construction through project that will treat Dubai’s entire wastewater to the highest to maintenance. For its part, the Real Estate Development environmental standards. activity led by BESIX RED offers innovative real estate solutions in the residential, commercial and office sectors in five European countries. BESIX’s unique expertise is ensured by it having an in-house Engineering Department, at the forefront of contemporary technologies.
    [Show full text]