List of Participants (PDF)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The National Bibliographic Knowledgebase Syndeo Regional Metadata Services
Track 3 – Library Services G. Connecting Regions with Global Impact The National Bibliographic Knowledgebase Syndeo Regional Metadata Services Neil Grindley, Head of Resource Discovery, Jisc Axel Kaschte, Product Strategy Director, OCLC The National Bibliographic Knowledgebase NEIL GRINDLEY, HEAD OF RESOURCE DISCOVERY, JISC Does 4 things… Providing and developing a Supporting the provision and Our network of national and Our R&D work, paid for entirely network infrastructure and management of digitalcontent regional teams provide local by our major funders, identifies related services that meet the for UK education and research engagement, advice and emerging technologies and needs of the UK research and support to help you get the develops them around your education communities most out of our service offer particular needs Jisc Bibliographic Data Services Acquisition Discovery Delivery Collection Management Select Check Manage Specific Unknown Select Link to Document Interlibrary Management Title Collection Book Availability Metadata Title Title Best Copy Best Copy Delivery Loan of Stock Usage Benchmarking Bibliographic Management Jisc Zetoc Jisc Reading Collections Circulation Copac Historical Lists KB+ Archives Hub Data JUSP Jisc Texts Services E-books Pilot SUNCAT CORE Copac CCM Tools NBK NBK NBK NBK Advice, guidance, technical support, quality assessment and new service development https://www.jisc.ac.uk/rd/projects/transforming-library-support-services Current Jisc Investments https://www.jisc.ac.uk/rd/projects/national-bibliographic-knowledgebase -
Open Publications
Open publications Research Services Essential Series Open Research Team 10th Feb 2021 1 Open Research team Caroline Huxtable (Open Access Repository Officer) Imogen Ward-Smith (Open Access Publications Officer) Chris Tibbs (Research Data Officer) Sofia Fernandes (Open Research Manager) www.exeter.ac.uk/research/openresearch/support/contact 2 http://www.exeter.ac.uk/research/researchdatamanagement/support/contact/ 2 Agenda • What is open research? • Why publish open access? • Open access, Symplectic and ORE • Open access policies • Publishing open access on the publisher website [email protected] 3 3 Open research Open research involves openness throughout the research lifecycle: • Openness as part of project planning / concept • Open notebook science • Making research methodology, software, code freely available • Open peer review • Open access to publications • Open data doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.49960 4 Open research lifecycle: Grigorov, Ivo. et al. (2016) ‘Research Lifecycle enhanced by an "Open Science by Default" Workflow’, Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.49960 Wikipedia: Open-notebook science is the practice of making the entire primary record of a research project publicly available online as it is recorded. This involves placing the personal, or laboratory, notebook of the researcher online along with all raw and processed data, and any associated material, as this material is generated. Open peer review includes e.g. the author and reviewer identities are disclosed to each other during the peer review process, unlike the traditional peer review process where reviewers are anonymous except to the editors; making reviewers' reports public, rather than disclosing to the authors only, (this may include publishing authors' replies and editors' recommendations); allowing self-selected reviewers to comment on an article, rather than (or in addition to) having reviewers selected by the editors. -
Newsletter of the IFLA Document Delivery and Resource Sharing Section
Newsletter of the IFLA Document Delivery and Resource Sharing Section ISSN 1016-281X September 2005 Table of Contents A Note from the Chair 2 Minutes of the Mid-Winter SC Meeting: Prague, 24-25 February 2005 3 New members’ biographies 6 News from members: Carol Smale (Canada) 8 News from members: Assunta Arte (Italy) News from members: Margarita Moreno (Australia) Open Session: Oslo conference (including abstracts of papers) 10 SUBITO and German developments in copyright law. Uwe Rosemann (German National Library of science and Technology, Hannover, Germany) 11 Standing Committee Members 14 This Newsletter is also available on IFLA Net www.ifla.org 1 A Note from the Chair Dear Section members, The 71st World Library and Information Congress in Oslo is now behind us and just a few weeks from now hopefully many of you will be travelling to Tallinn to participate in the 9th IFLA Interlending and Document Supply International Conference. During the WLIC in Oslo the Section had a very successful programme on Perspectives on supply of electronic documents. The first of the three papers that were presented there you will find in this issue of our newsletter while the remaining two will be published in the following issue. In his paper on SUBITO and German developments in copyright law Dr. Uwe Rosemann puts focus on what is happening not only in Germany but in many other countries as well if publishers and associates succeed in having their own way. The German court will have to decide if – as claimed by the publishers – interlibrary loan activities not only happening between German and foreign libraries but between libraries within Germany as well are illegal. -
192 College & Research Libraries March 1997 Ness, the Implication
192 College & Research Libraries March 1997 ness, the implication being that these Finally, a book published in 1996 sectors are more service oriented than should surely give great emphasis to are libraries. Because this reviewer be- networked information and the digital lieves strongly that the service ethic has library, because one can reasonably ex- declined precipitously in all segments pect that users will exploit such re- of society (including libraries) over the sources in ways different from the ways past forty years (try to reach any hu- they exploit print resources and, thus, man being by telephone today; try to criteria relating to “service quality” get a reply to any business correspon- could be different. Although some dence), he finds this almost entirely rather oblique references occur in the platitudinous. A statement of commit- text, the topic is never really addressed ment to excellence does not, in itself, head-on and the terms digital library, elec- guarantee even adequacy. tronic information, Internet, or even net- Chapter 8 gives us a few pages on work do not appear in the index (which, what “leadership” means in libraries in any case, is rather pathetic). and chapter 9 tells us that service qual- This is not a book I can recommend ity is a critical issue in academic librar- to either library managers or students ies and in higher education in general. of library science. Both the theoretical None of this is new or inspiring. discussion and the survey instruments Chapter 7 presents a hodgepodge of have been done better before. A methods that libraries could use to ex- hardbound version (ISBN 1-56750-209-1) amine quality of service, everything is also available at an almost unbeliev- from reshelving surveys to OPAC trans- able price of $52.50 for fewer than 200 action logs; and chapter 6 (which seems pages.—F. -
Interactive Open Access Publishing & Collaborative Peer Review for Improved Scientific Communication and Quality Assurance
Interactive Open Access Publishing & Collaborative Peer Review for Improved Scientific Communication & Quality Assurance Ulrich Pöschl Max-Planck-Institut für Chemie, Mainz www.mpch-mainz.mpg.de/~poeschl European Geosciences Union www.egu.eu EGU Outline Introduction ¾ challenges & perspectives Interactive Open Access Publishing & Collaborative Peer Review ¾ concepts & effects Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) & European Geosciences Union (EGU) ¾ aims & achievements Conclusions ¾ summary & outlook EGU Motivation of Open Access Scientific, educational & economic advantages of free online availability of scientific research publications Educational: ¾ inform & stimulate students & general public ¾ equal opportunities in the information society (global & social) Economic: ¾ liberate distorted scientific information market (subscription/usage, cost/benefit, library budget crisis) ¾ enhance efficiency & facilitate innovation (formatting, distribution, evaluation, archiving, etc.) Scientific: ¾ enhance research impact & productivity ¾ improve quality assurance: bigger need, larger gain and higher importance than “mere increase of impact & productivity” EGU Open Access & Quality Assurance Open Access not a threat to scientific quality assurance but an urgently needed opportunity for improvement Traditional Peer Review: fully compatible with OA ¾ successful OA journals with traditional peer review, e.g.: PLoS Biology, BMC Structural Biology, New J. Physics, etc. Information for Reviewers: strongly enhanced by OA ¾ unlimited & interdisciplinary -
Analysis of the IFLA Survey on Preservation Standards, Guidelines, and Best Practises (2016)
Analysis of the IFLA survey on preservation standards, guidelines, and best practises (2016) CONTENTS 1 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Analysis of survey participation ............................................................................................................ 3 2.1 All responses (partial and completed – extracted from part 1 of the survey) ............................. 3 2.1.1 Response count .............................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2 Response timeline .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Type / Domain of institution / organisation .................................................................. 4 2.1.4 Response count (complete responses) .......................................................................... 5 2.1.5 Type / Domain of institution / organisation .................................................................. 6 2.1.6 Geographical spread ...................................................................................................... 7 3 Analysis of part 2-4 of the survey ......................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Part 2: Your physical/analogue collections ................................................................................... 8 3.2 Part 3: Your -
Interactive Public Peer Reviewtm: an Innovative Approach to Scientific Quality Assurance
Interactive Public Peer ReviewTM: an innovative approach to scientific quality assurance a, 1 Xenia VAN EDIG aCopernicus Publications, Bahnhofsallee 1e, 37075 Göttingen, Germany [email protected] Abstract. Besides providing open access to the article, Copernicus Publications provides open access to the peer review via its Interactive Public Peer ReviewTM. In this process, a public discussion among the author, two independent referees, and interested members of the scientific community builds the core of the peer- review process. Keywords. Peer review, open access, transparency 1. Introduction The discussions surrounding peer review are ongoing. Several authors are claiming a crisis of peer review with regard to its length (Nguyen et al. 2015; Powell 2016) and effectiveness (Lee et al. 2013; Walker R. and Rocha da Silva, 2015), and researchers are calling for more openness in the process (Aleksic et al. 2015). Copernicus Publications already developed a new form of peer review in 2001 (Pöschl 2012). Since then, the process has been implemented in different scientific disciplines and enhanced continuously. Today, 18 open-access journals published by Copernicus Publications apply this form of peer review. In addition, an economy journal also applies this kind of peer review. In the following, the initial idea and the development of the process of Interactive Public Peer ReviewTM are described. TM 2. Interactive Public Peer Review When the concept of interactive open-access publishing and Interactive Public Peer ReviewTM was developed by Ulrich Pöschl and his fellow scientists in 2000, they faced the problem that the traditional journal publication and peer-review process were not sufficient for thorough quality assurance, constructive discussion, and integration of scientific knowledge: the majority of studies did not build on related earlier publications, and some studies were not even self-consistent even though they had been published in reputable journals with high impact factors. -
Cultural Heritage Digitisation, Online Accessibility and Digital Preservation
1 Cultural heritage Digitisation, online accessibility and digital preservation REPORT on the Implementation of Commission Recommendation 2011/711/EU 2013-2015 Cover image: Albert Edelfelt’s 'The Luxembourg Gardens, Paris', Finnish National Gallery. Source: europeana.eu Back cover image: Raphael's 'Sposalizio della Vergine', Pinacoteca di Brera (Milano). Source: europeana.eu Page | 2 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology Page | 3 Implementation of Commission Recommendation on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation Progress report 2013-2015 Working document June 2016 Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 6 1. DIGITISATION: ORGANISATION AND FUNDING ................................................................................ 10 1.1. Planning and monitoring digitisation ......................................................................................... 10 1.1.1. Schemes, quantitative targets and allocated budgets ........................................................ 11 Page | 4 1.1.2 National and European overviews of digitised cultural material ........................................ 14 1.2 Public - private partnerships ....................................................................................................... 16 1.3 Use of Structural Funds .............................................................................................................. -
WEB PRESENCE and STRUCTURE EVALUATION of the EUROPEAN NATIONAL LIBRARIES’ WEBSITES: a STUDY Monika Gupta Maharaja Agarsen P
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2017 WEB PRESENCE AND STRUCTURE EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN NATIONAL LIBRARIES’ WEBSITES: A STUDY Monika Gupta Maharaja Agarsen P. G. College for Women, Jhajjar, Haryana, [email protected] Paramjeet K. Walia Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Gupta, Monika and Walia, Paramjeet K., "WEB PRESENCE AND STRUCTURE EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN NATIONAL LIBRARIES’ WEBSITES: A STUDY" (2017). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1809. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1809 WEB PRESENCE AND STRUCTURE EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN NATIONAL LIBRARIES’ WEBSITES: A STUDY Dr. Monika Gupta Librarian Maharaja Agarsen Post-Graduate College for Women, Jhajjar Jhajjar- 124103 Haryana, India E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No: 8684031775 Prof. Paramjeet K. Walia Professor Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi. Delhi-110007 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No: 9810767709 Abstract The purpose of this study is to evaluate European national libraries’ websites on the basis of webometrics. It also analyze the structure of the selected European national libraries’ websites on the basis of number of checkpoints. On the basis of number of web indicators such as number of webpages, in-links, rich content files, publications in Google Scholar and WISER, web presence of the selected European national libraries’ websites were examined. For collection of webometrics data Google search engine and Check PageRank tool were used. -
Newsletter 6 December 2002
Consortium of European Research Libraries Newsletter 6 December 2002 http://www.cerl.org/ ISSN 1680-4546 (appears twice a year) New files on the Hand Press Book (HPB) database Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek, Göttingen This file, the ‘GBV-Holdings of the Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen’, currently numbers 15,317 records and covers the period from the beginning of printing to the year 1830. The file is an extract from the Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverbund (GBV) Union Catalogue, and represents the complete Göttingen holdings of one-volume works from this era. The file does not contain records of maps, microforms, online resources or music. Göttingen University Library was founded in 1734 as a practical working library for the new university. Its founding collections are the library of the Göttingen Grammar School (with books mainly on history, classical philology and theology), the library of Joachim Hinrich von Bülow (1650-1724; a universal library with an emphasis on historical, political and legal literature), and duplicates from the Royal Library in Hanover. Several decades later it was enhanced by the collection of Friedrich Armand von Uffenbach (1687-1769), whose books on mathematics, engineering, topography and history of art came to the library in 1770. Through purchasing and the support of the university’s founder and curator, Minister and Privy Councillor Gerlach Adolph Freiherr von Münchhausen (1688-1770), the Library steadily increased its holdings. Leading scholars, such as Johann Matthias Genser (1691-17651), and for almost fifty years, Christian Gottlieb Heyne (1763-1812), were in charge of the Library Christian Gottlieb Heyne and did much to improve its collections. -
Strategische Und Operative Handlungsoptionen Für Wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen Zur Gestaltung Der Open-Access-Transformation
! ! ! !"#$"%&'()*%+,-.+/0%#$"'1%+2$-.3,-&(/0"'/-%-+ 45#+6'((%-()*$4"3')*%+7'-#')*",-&%-+8,#+ 9%("$3",-&+.%#+:0%-;<))%((;=#$-(4/#>$"'/-+ ! "#$$%&'('#)*! "#$!%$&'()#()!*+,!'-'*+./,01+(!2$'*+,! ")+')&!,-#.)$),-#(%! /"&0!,-#.01! ! +/()+$+/013! '(!*+$!41/&5,561/,01+(!7'-#&383! *+$!9#.:5&*3;<(/=+$,/383!"#!>+$&/(! ! =5(!9+/("!4'.6+&! ! ! ?/+!4$8,/*+(3/(!*+$!9#.:5&*3;<(/=+$,/383!"#!>+$&/(@!! 4$5AB!?$B;C()B!?$B!D':/(+!E#(,3! ! ?/+!?+-'(/(!*+$!41/&5,561/,01+(!7'-#&383@! 4$5AB!?$B!2':$/+&+!F+3"&+$! ! ! 2#3'013+$! %$,3)#3'013+$@!! ! 4$5AB!?$B!4+3+$!D01/$.:'01+$! GH+/3)#3'013+$@!! 4$5AB!?$B!I5&A$'.!95$,3.'((! ! ?'3#.!*+$!?/,6#3'3/5(@!JKB!F'/!LMLJ! !"#$%&'()*+),-#",'. G#,'..+(A',,#()!BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB!NC! O:,3$'03!BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB!NCC! ?'(-,')#()!BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB!NCCC! O:-P$"#(),=+$"+/01(/,!BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB!CQ! R':+&&+(=+$"+/01(/,!BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB!QCC! O::/&*#(),=+$"+/01(/,!BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB!QCCC! -
Plos Progress Update 2014/2015 from the Chairman and Ceo
PLOS PROGRESS UPDATE 2014/2015 FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO PLOS is dedicated to the transformation of research communication through collaboration, transparency, speed and access. Since its founding, PLOS has demonstrated the viability of high quality, Open Access publishing; launched the ground- breaking PLOS ONE, a home for all sound science selected for its rigor, not its “significance”; developed the first Article- Level Metrics (ALMs) to demonstrate the value of research beyond the perceived status of a journal title; and extended the impact of research after its publication with the PLOS data policy, ALMs and liberal Open Access licensing. But challenges remain. Scientific communication is far from its ideal state. There is still inconsistent access, and research is oered at a snapshot in time, instead of as an evolving contribution whose reliability and significance are continually evaluated through its lifetime. The current state demands that PLOS continue to establish new standards and expectations for scholarly communication. These include a faster and more ecient publication experience, more transparent peer review, assessment though the lifetime of a work, better recognition of the range of contributions made by collaborators and placing researchers and their communities back at the center of scientific communication. To these ends, PLOS is developing ApertaTM, a system that will facilitate and advance the submission and peer review process for authors, editors and reviewers. PLOS is also creating richer and more inclusive forums, such as PLOS Paleontology and PLOS Ecology Communities and the PLOS Science Wednesday redditscience Ask Me Anything. Progress is being made on early posting of manuscripts at PLOS.