DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Environmental Examination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Environmental Examination Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 51081-002 KGZ December 2020 Kyrgyz Republic: Climate Change and Disaster-Resilient Water Resources Sector Project – Pravaya-Vetka Subproject Prepared by the State Agency for Water Resources under the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic for the Asian Development Bank (ADB). This is an updated version of the draft IEE dated October 2018 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/kgz-51081-002-iee-0 This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. 1 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Weights and Measures ......................................................................................................................... 9 Currency Equivalents............................................................................................................................ 9 Notes .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 10 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 13 I.1. Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 13 I.2. Identification of the Project and Project Proponents ...................................................................... 13 I.3. Purpose of the Report .................................................................................................................... 13 I.4. Procedure of the Subproject Selection ........................................................................................... 14 I.4.1. Subproject Screening Criteria ...................................................................................................... 14 I.4.2. Irrigated Agriculture Subproject Ranking Criteria ........................................................................ 14 I.4.3. Conclusion Regarding Environment in the Selection Process .................................................... 15 I.5. Boundaries of the IEE ..................................................................................................................... 15 I.6. Scope of the IEE ............................................................................................................................. 20 I.6.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 20 I.6.2. IEE Information Sources and Limitations .................................................................................... 20 I.7. Structure of the Report ................................................................................................................... 20 II. POLICY, LEGAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ........................................................... 21 II.1. National and Local Legal and Institutional Framework ................................................................. 21 II.1.1. Environmental Protection Law and Policy .................................................................................. 21 II.1.2. Project Status Regarding Environmental Regulations ............................................................... 25 II.1.3. Other Legislation and Standards ................................................................................................ 25 II.1.4. Institutional Framework .............................................................................................................. 28 II.2. International Agreements Relevant to the Project ......................................................................... 29 II.3. ADB Requirements ........................................................................................................................ 30 II.3.1. Policies ....................................................................................................................................... 30 II.3.2. Guidance .................................................................................................................................... 30 II.3.3. Environmental Screening & Categories ..................................................................................... 30 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................................ 32 III.1. Overall Framework ....................................................................................................................... 32 III.2. The Pravaya-Vetka Subproject ..................................................................................................... 33 III.2.1. Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 33 III.2.2. Present Status of the Pravaya-Vetka Irrigation System ............................................................ 33 III.2.3. Project Components .................................................................................................................. 36 III.2.4. Organization of the Construction Works .................................................................................... 51 III.2.5. Planning ..................................................................................................................................... 53 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT (BASELINE DATA) ..................................................... 54 IV.1. Physical environment ................................................................................................................... 54 IV.1.1. Current Climatic Conditions ...................................................................................................... 54 IV.1.2. Climate Changes ....................................................................................................................... 55 IV.1.3. Air Quality .................................................................................................................................. 58 IV.1.4. Topography, Geology and Soils ................................................................................................ 58 IV.1.5. Surface Water ........................................................................................................................... 59 IV.1.6. Groundwater.............................................................................................................................. 61 IV.2. Biological environment ................................................................................................................. 61 IV.2.1. The Aquatic Environment .......................................................................................................... 61 IV.2.2. The Terrestrial Environment ...................................................................................................... 66 IV.2.3. Protected Areas ........................................................................................................................ 71 IV.2.4. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 72 IV.3. Human environment ..................................................................................................................... 73 IV.3.1. Administrative Context .............................................................................................................. 73 IV.3.2. Population ................................................................................................................................. 73 TA 51081-002 KGZ - IEE December 2020 Page 1 IV.3.3. Land Management and Activities .............................................................................................. 75 IV.3.4. Infrastructure and Public Facilities ............................................................................................ 76 IV.3.5. Historical, Archaeological, Paleontological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Hydrological Processes (Floods, High Water, Lateral Erosion and Mudflows) in the Kara-Unkyur River Basin (Kyrgyzstan)
    Central Asian Journal of Water Research (2017) 3(1): 43-53 Special Issue on Water Hazards in Central Asia © The Author(s) 2017. Evaluation of hydrological processes (floods, high water, lateral erosion and mudflows) in the Kara-Unkyur River Basin (Kyrgyzstan) Moldobekov B. D. Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences (CAIAG) ([email protected]) Abdibachaev U. A. Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences (CAIAG) Kalashnikova O. Ju. Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences (CAIAG) Abstract Almost in all river basins of Central Asia, with the onset of spring, the probability of natural disasters, such as floods, high water and related lateral erosion, increases. Especially, these phenomena often occur in large river basins of Fergana Valley, Kyrgyz ridge and Trans-Ili Alatau. The aim of this study was to identify vulnerable areas affected by erosion processes in the course of disastrous floods and high water in order to take preventive measures for protection of settlements, their territories and infrastructure. To identify vulnerable areas affected by erosion processes in the Kara-Unkyur River Basin, a complex of field methods of ground-based observation was implemented with the use of Remote Sensing (RS) data. Based on the obtained data, a degree of manifestation of exogenous geological processes was analyzed and evaluated. Recommendations for decision- making were elaborated and submitted to the state authorities (Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Kyrgyz Republic, MES). Keywords: catastrophic floods, erosion processes, Kara-Unkur River, remote sensing, hydrological processes. 1. Introduction Occurrence and development of hazardous hydrological events, such as floods, high water and lateral erosion, are determined by a set of natural conditions and a sum of development factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin Geographical Papers 43 43 Vol
    Berlin Geographical Papers 43 43 Vol. 42 KREUTZMANN, H. (ed.) (2013): Preservation of Built Environment and its Impacts on Community Utilisation and Management of Development in Gilgit-Baltistan Natural Resources in Kyrgyzstan Vol. 41 ENZNER, M. (2013): Carpenters of Chiniot, Pakistan. The Social Economy of Woodcraft and Furniture Production Vol. 40 SPIES, M. (2011): Deconstructing Flood Risks. A Livelihoods and Vulnerability Analysis in Jakarta, Dörre & Schütte (eds.) Indonesia Vol. 39 KRECZI, F. (2011): Vulnerabilities in the Eastern Pamir Vol. 38 KREUTZMANN, H. & S. SCHÜTTE (eds.) (2011): After the Flood in Pakistan. Assessing Vulnerability in Rural Sindh Vol. 37 VÖHRINGER, M. (2010): Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development. An Impact Assessment of Micro and Mini Hydel Projects in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan Vol. 36 KREUTZMANN, H. & S. SCHÜTTE (eds.) (2009): Three Years After. Evaluation of the GRC/ICRC Livestock Programme in the Earthquake-affected Areas of Paksitan-administered Kashmir apers Vol. 35 KREUTZMANN, H., M. SCHMIDT & A. BENZ (eds.) (2008): The Shigar Microcosm: Socio-economic Utilisation an Management of Natural Resources in Kyrgyzstan P Investigations in a Karakoram Oasis, Northern Areas of Pakistan Vol. 34 BLANK, M. (2007): Rückkehr zur subsistenzorientierten Viehhaltung als Existenzsicherungsstrategie. Hochweidewirtschaft in Südkirgistan Vol. 33 MAIER, C. (2007): Decentralised Rural Electrification by Means of Collective Action. The Sustainability of Community Managed Micro Hydels in Chitral, Pakistan Vol. 32 SCHMIDT, M. (2006): Transformation der Livelihood Strategies im ländlichen Kirgistan. Verlorene Sicherheiten und neue Herausforderungen aphical r � Edited by Berlin Geog Andrei Dörre Stefan Schütte Centre for Development Studies (ZELF) Institute of Geographical Sciences Freie Universität Berlin 2014 ZELF ZELF Editor of Berlin Geographical Papers Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Walnut Forest and Pasture Management in the South of Kyrgyzstan Promoting Biodiversity Conservation and Supporting Local Income Generation
    Implemented by: Community-based Walnut Forest and Pasture Management in the South of Kyrgyzstan Promoting biodiversity conservation and supporting local income generation Context Project name Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Reduction through Community-based Management of Walnut Despite the relatively small territory they cover, the woodlands of Forests and Pastures southern Kyrgyzstan constitute an important chain of biological diversity, both for Central Asia and the world. As many domesticated Commissioned German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation by and Development (BMZ) varieties of fruit and nut trees have their historical origins in these forests, ecological conservation here is of national and global Project region Kyrgyzstan, Jalal-Abad region significance. Much as their ancestors before them, the local Lead executing State Agency for Environmental Protection and population is highly dependent upon the natural resources proffered agency Forestry by the forests for their livelihood, especially nuts and pasture Duration 2018-2020 (livestock). Kyrgyzstan is counted among the countries predicted to be the Our objectives most severely affected by global climate change. With 93 percent of its territory mountainous, it is especially susceptible to the In close collaboration with national and local partners, we hazards of glacial melt. This is expected to exacerbate soil erosion, have been aiming to incorporate a sustainable natural resource resulting in landslides and the deterioration of pasture and forest management model into the economic practices of southern resources. And it is particularly as the southern woodlands serve Kyrgyzstan’s woodland-dependent communities, thereby assisting as natural regulators of the regional water cycle, especially for them in conserving the biodiversity they depend upon, adapting to downstream areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Rehabilitation in Kyrgyzstan
    Forest Rehabilitation in Kyrgyzstan Almazbek Orozumbekov13, Turatbek Musuraliev14, Biimyrza Toktoraliev15, Askat Kysanov16, Bakytbek Shamshiev17, Ormon Sultangaziev18 1. General Information 1.1 Geographic Information The territory of the Kyrgyz Republic is 19.99 million ha (4.3% are forests, 4.4% - water surface, 54.0% - agricultural lands and 37.3% - other lands). Almost 95% of the territory is mountainous at more than 1500 m asl. The average elevation is 2,750 m asl with the highest point at 7,439 m and the lowest one at 401 m. Fifty eight percent (58%) of all human settlements in the country are located within the elevation of 1,000-2,000 m (35% of the total population) while 5% live above 2,000 m asl. Nearly 90% of the total territory of Kyrgyzstan lies at altitudes of 1,500 m asl and higher (Abdymomunov 2001a) and more than 40% above 3,000 m asl (von Maydell, 1983). The Kyrgyz Republic is bordered by the Republic of Kazakhstan, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Tajikistan and the Uzbek Republic. Located at the intersection of three large soil-climatic zones (i.e. Eurasia-Turanian, Western-Asian and Central Asian), Kyrgyzstan’s climate shows a variety of climates. The Kyrgyz Republic is located at the junction of two mountain systems (the Tien Shan and the Pamir). The highest points of the Republic in the Tien Shan Mountains are Victory Peak (Pobedy) (7,439 m) and Khan-Tengri (6,995 m). The lowest lying area is a transboundary crossing of the Naryn River at 480 m asl.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Based Tourism in Arslanbob and Sary-Moghul, Kyrgyzstan: an Alternative to Labour-Migration?
    Lund University Master of Science in International Development and Management June, 2015 Community Based Tourism in Arslanbob and Sary-Moghul, Kyrgyzstan: An Alternative to Labour-Migration? Authors: Ernst-Armin Tõnisson & Yasmin Yassin Supervisor: Johan Sandberg ABSTRACT This research studies the perceptions of Community Based Tourism (CBT) workers towards labour-migration in the two mountainous southern Kyrgyz villages of Sary Moghul and Arslanbob. The qualitative data collected through semi-structured interviews from 28 CBT workers and four key stakeholders reveal four Ideal Types of labour-migration amongst the CBT workers: i) CBT workers who wish to labour-migrate but have yet to have done so; ii) CBT workers who have labour-migrated and returned; iii) CBT workers who are circulatory labour-migrants; and finally iv) CBT workers who have never labour-migrated and currently have no motivation to do so. Qualitative analysis reveals participants from Ideal Type 1 migrating for sociocultural factors, whereas Ideal Types 2 and 3 labour-migrate due to economic factors. Ideal Type 4, a group predominantly composed of individuals with no interest in labour-migration reveals both social and economic factors as the determinants of labour-migration. It is found that in general CBTs have dis-incentivised labour-migration for all the Ideal Types with the exception of Type 4 which by definition does not seek labour- migration. Ideal Type 2 perceives CBTs dis-incentivising labour-migration both socially as well as economically, whereas Ideal Types
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Walnut Value Chain in the Kyrgyz Republic
    MAY 2012 WORKING PAPER Analysis of the Walnut Value Chain in the Kyrgyz Republic A PROFOR WORKING PAPER A PROFOR WORKING PAPER DISCLAIMER All omissions and inaccuracies in this document are the responsibility of the authors. The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of the institutions involved, nor do they necessarily represent official policies of PROFOR or the World Bank. Suggested citation: Bourne, Willie. 2012. Analysis of the Walnut Value Chain in the Kyrgyz Republic Working Paper. Washington D.C: PROFOR. Published in May 2012 For a full list of publications please contact: Program on Forests (PROFOR) 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA [email protected] www.profor.info/profor/knowledge Profor is a multi-donor partnership supported by: Learn more at www.profor.info 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This analysis was funded by the Program on Forests (PROFOR), a multidonor partnership managed by a core team at the World Bank (www.profor.info), as an input into a larger study on the development potential of forests in the Kyrgyz Republic conducted by the Rural Development Fund (www.rdf.in.kg). This report, written by Willie Bourne, presents findings from a rapid appraisal and field study of the walnut value chain in Jalal-Abad province in southern Kyrgyz Republic between March 28 and April 1, 2011. The field survey was undertaken by a small team of researchers and forest field staff from Toskool-Ata leskhoz. The Rapid Market Appraisal (RMA) team would like to thank Mr. Rysbek Akenshaev, Head of Department of the Jalal-Abad Provincial State Department for Forestry and Ecology, for his assistance in setting up survey arrangements, and also to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyz Republic Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan
    Kyrgyz Republic Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan Ministry of Environmental Protection Bishkek November 1998 Front Cover 1. BSAP Logo. The logo represents the perfection and sustainability of biodiversity and mountains. The background is the traditional Kyrgyz ‘world tree’ symbol, which combines underground, ground and air elements, it’s shape represents the wholeness of the circle. Signs of plants and animals are also represented in the symbol’s design (e.g. ram’s horns). In the foreground are 1 three mountains; these represent the mountainous landscape of the Kyrgyz Republic, the ecological pyramids of healthy ecosystems, and the three main kingdoms of living creatures (plants, animals, and micro-organisms). (Designed by Emil Shukurov) 2. Snow leopard (Uncia uncia). The critically endangered snow leopard is of 3 spiritual significance to the Kyrgyz culture. (Rod Williams/Bruce Coleman Collection) 2 3. Mountain meadow. Meadows such as this contain many plants endemic to 4 the country, support grazing pastures that are an essential to the livelihoods of thousands of people in the country, and harbour many wild relatives of cultivated plants and flowers. (Mike Appleton/FFI) 4. Decorative plant carvings on 11 th century Qarakhanid mausoleam, 7 6 5 Uzgen, showing the ancient historical link between Kyrgyz culture and biodiversity. (Edward O’Keefe/FFI) 5. Kyrgyz Republic flag. The centre represents the symbolic centre of the traditional nomadic tents or yurts, surrounded by forty rays of light, representing the forty Kyrgyz tribes. 6. Sary Chelek Lake at the heart of Sary Chelek zapovednik. The lake contains an endemic species of fish and the surrounding mountains harbour many other rare and endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Implementation and Effectiveness of the National Drug
    Policy Research Paper №77 Evaluation of implementation and effectiveness of the State Drug Policy of the Kyrgyz Republic for 2007-2010 Aida Abdraimova (HPAC) Julia Aleshkina (HPAC) Larisa Tsigelskaya (DS&MTD) Aisha Sulaimanova (DS&MTD) Bishkek 2012 1 Content 1. Background..……………………………………………………………………………………5 2. Goal and objectives of the evaluation.……………………………………………………….6 3. Evaluation materials and methodology………………………………………………………7 4. Evaluation results 4.1. Review of SDP (2007-2010): logical structure, introduction mechanisms, responsible persons, M&E…………………………………………………………………………9 4.2. Review of the current situation with drug supply for population of the country..…………………………………………………………………………….13 4.3. Affordability of drugs..…………………………………………………………..….20 4.4. Drug safety and quality. ………… ……………………………………………….30 4.5. Rational use of drugs.…………………...…………………………………………33 5. Conclusions..………………………………………………………………………………….45 6. Recommendations………………………………………………………………………….…46 7. Attachment 1 Logical structure of SDP……..……………………………………………..47 8. Attachment 2…………………………………………………………………………………..48 2 Acknowledgement Health Policy Analysis Center extends its deep gratitude to all managers of Family Medicine Centers and pharmacies in Bishkek, Chui, Issyk-Kul and Osh oblasts which have been involved into the study for their assistance and contribution to information collection. We would like to express out special gratitude to KFW for their financial support to conduction of the study. 3 Abbreviations BA Bronchial asthma WHO World Health Organization SDP State
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyz Republic Program Evaluation Evolving Transition to a Market Economy
    Country Assistance Kyrgyz Republic Program Evaluation Evolving Transition to a Market Economy Independent Evaluation Country Assistance Program Evaluation August 2012 Kyrgyz Republic Country Assistance Program Evaluation: Evolving Transition to a Market Economy Reference Number: CAP: KGZ 2012-09 Independent Evaluation Department, CE-27 Director General V. Thomas, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) Director W. Kolkma, Independent Evaluation Division 1, IED Team leader S. Hutaserani, Lead Evaluation Specialist, IED Team members L. Ocenar, Evaluation Officer, IED G. Castillo, Senior Evaluation Assistant, IED Preparatory work in 2011: David Dole, Team Leader, now in Central and West Asia Department Henrike Feig, Principal Evaluation Specialist, IED Toshiyuki Yokota, Senior Evaluation Specialist, IED Rajesh Vasudevan, Evaluation Specialist, IED Raikhan Sabirova, Evaluation Specialist, IED Alvin Morales, Evaluation Officer, IED Barbara Palacios, Senior Evaluation Officer (retired), IED Irene Garganta, Senior Evaluation Assistant, IED The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of the management of Independent Evaluation Department, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report. In preparing any evaluation report, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Independent
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyz Republic Improving Growth Potential
    KYRGYZ REPUBLIC IMPROVING GROWTH POTENTIAL Takashi Yamano, Hal Hill, Edimon Ginting, and Jindra Samson SEPTEMBER 2019 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK KYRGYZ REPUBLIC IMPROVING GROWTH POTENTIAL Takashi Yamano, Hal Hill, Edimon Ginting, and Jindra Samson SEPTEMBER 2019 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2019 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2019. ISBN 978-92-9261-736-3 (print), 978-92-9261-737-0 (electronic) Publication Stock No. TCS190437-2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TCS190437-2 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Walnut Forest and Pasture Management in the South of Kyrgyzstan Promoting Biodiversity Conservation and Supporting Local Income Generation
    Implemented by: Community-based Walnut Forest and Pasture Management in the South of Kyrgyzstan Promoting biodiversity conservation and supporting local income generation Context Project name Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Reduction through Community-based Management of Walnut Forests and Pastures Despite the relatively small territory they cover, the woodlands of Commissioned German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation southern Kyrgyzstan constitute an important chain of biological by and Development (BMZ) diversity, both for Central Asia and the world. As many domesti- Project region Kyrgyzstan, Jalal-Abad region cated varieties of fruit and nut trees have their historical origins in Lead executing State Agency for Environmental Protection and these forests, ecological conservation here is of national and global agency Forestry significance. Much as their ancestors before them, the local popula- Duration 2018-2020 tion is highly dependent upon the natural resources proffered by the forests for their livelihood, especially nuts and pasture (livestock). Our measures The existing system of forest and pasture management will be unable to cope with consequences of climate change, in large part Our project has been implemented in Bazar-Korgon, a district because it simply lacks management at all. For instance, between of the Jalal-Abad region. 13,000 hectares are covered by natural 50 and 70 percent of pastureland has already been degraded due to walnut forests – the largest of their kind in the world. Another livestock overgrazing. 36,700 hectares are used as pasture, while highlands constitute the remaining 75,300 hectares and serve as home to more than The relevant state structures struggle with resolving conflicts 47,000 people.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitating Development in Rural Kyrgyzstan. the Example of the Arslanbob Local Authority
    Annika Gerstenberg & Pia Langeheine Facilitating Development in Rural Kyrgyzstan. The Example of the Arslanbob Local Authority Introduction and rationale During the Soviet era, most people in Kyrgyzstan had secured state paid employment and officially, there was no unemployment. A focus on education improved literacy rates, access to basic health services was guaranteed and a system of pension insurance was in place that sufficed for a reasonable subsistence (Schmidt 2006: 13). Inquiries show that most of the elderly population of the Arslanbob local authority, comprised of the head village Arslanbob and 4 other settlements, namely Gumkhana, Bel Terek, Jaiterek and Jaradar, associate Soviet times with very positively connoted memories of security and continuity (ibid: 36). With the end of the Soviet Union and the collapse of the socialist system, the development of Kyrgyzstan experienced a harsh set-back. Becoming an independent country in 1991, Kyrgyzstan underwent radical changes which revoked much of the progress made during the Soviet years. Poverty and unemployment escalated during the first decade of independence. Medical assistance had to be paid for and public welfare services such as social welfare and unemployment assistance were scaled down. The economic recession was the consequence of the disintegration of the system that for decades had set a very strict (but socially very safe) frame. The resulting disorder was increased by people’s lack of experience, since for many decades they had been taught not to act on their own responsibility (ibid: 18, 37). The research area also saw an economic recession in the early years of independence which seriously affected people’s lives.
    [Show full text]