DOCSLIB.ORG

Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 Regulatory Impact Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 and the Victorian Guide to Regulation. Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 Regulatory Impact Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared to fulfil the requirements of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 and to facilitate public consultation on the proposed Wildlife (Game) Regulation 2012. In accordance with the Victorian Guide to Regulation, the Victorian Government seeks to ensure that proposed regulations are well- targeted, effective and appropriate, and impose the lowest possible burden on Victorian business and the community. A prime function of the RIS process is to help members of the public comment on proposed statutory rules (regulations) before they have been finalised. Such public input can provide valuable information and perspectives, and thus improve the overall quality of the regulations. The proposed Regulations are being circulated to key stakeholders and any other interested parties, and feedback is now sought. A copy of the proposed Regulations is provided as an attachment to this RIS. Public comments and submissions are now invited on the proposed Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012. All submissions will be treated as public documents and published on the Department of Primary Industries website. Written submissions should be forwarded by 5.00pm, 20 August 2012 to: Mr Zachary Powell Game Victoria Department of Primary Industries 1 Spring Street Melbourne VIC 3000 or email: [email protected] If you would like to receive this information/publication in an accessible format (such as large print or audio) please call the Customer Service Centre on 136 186, TTY 1800 122 969, or email [email protected]. Published by the Department of Primary Industries Game Victoria, July 2012. © The State of Victoria 2012. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Department of Primary Industries 1 Spring Street, Melbourne 3000. ISBN 978-1-74326-246-7 (print) ISBN 978-1-74326-247-4 (online) This Regulatory Impact Statement was prepared for the Department of Primary Industries by Regulatory Impact Solutions Pty Ltd. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. The Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 and Victorian Guide to Regulation require assessment of alternative non-regulatory and regulatory options. The Victoria Government notes that some options may be inconsistent with current government policy but recognises the requirement for a range of options to be considered. For more information about DPI go to www.dpi.vic.gov.au or phone the Customer Service Centre on 136 186. Table of Contents ABBREVIATONS ............................................................................................................................................. III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................1 1. WHAT IS THE ISSUE/PROBLEM TO BE ADDRESSED? ..................................................................14 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................14 1.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK...................................................................................................................18 1.3 RATIONALE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION ....................................................................................18 1.4 PROBLEMS THE REGULATIONS SEEK TO ADDRESS .................................................................................20 1.5 NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE PROBLEM ................................................................................................23 2. OBJECTIVES OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.........................................................................42 2.1 GOVERNMENT POLICY............................................................................................................................42 2.2 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................43 2.3 AUTHORISING PROVISION.......................................................................................................................43 3. OPTIONS TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................44 3.1 REGULATORY AND NON-REGULATORY OPTIONS ...................................................................................44 3.2 REGULATORY ARRANGEMENTS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS.....................................................................52 4. COSTS AND BENEFITS OF THE OPTIONS.........................................................................................54 4.1 BASE CASE..............................................................................................................................................54 4.2 METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................................55 4.3 ASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS.......................................................................................................................57 4.A FEES .........................................................................................................................................................69 5. PREFERRED OPTION..............................................................................................................................77 5.1 PREFERRED OPTION ................................................................................................................................77 5.2 GROUPS AFFECTED .................................................................................................................................80 5.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS ....................................................................................80 6. ASSESSMENT OF COMPETITION & SMALL BUSINESS IMPACTS.............................................81 7. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT ISSUES ........................................................................84 8. EVALUATION............................................................................................................................................88 9. CONSULTATION.......................................................................................................................................89 10. ATTACHMENTS........................................................................................................................................96 WILDLIFE (GAME) REGULATIONS Regulatory Impact Statement – Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 ABBREVIATONS DPI – Department of Primary Industries DSE – Department of Sustainability and Environment FTE – Full Time Equivalent (staff) HHT – Hound Hunting Test (the proposed Regulation now refer to this test as the ‘Sambar Deer Hunting with Hounds Test’. For ease of expression, this RIS will refer to the Hound Hunting Test). MCA – Multi-criteria Analysis Premier’s Guidelines – Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 Guidelines PV – present value. Present value ‘discounts’ the value of money in future years to allow it to be valued in today’s terms. r. – regulations RIS – Regulatory Impact Statement s. – section the current Regulations – Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2001 the proposed Regulations – Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 VCEC – Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission VPS – Victorian Public Service WIT – Waterfowl Identification Test iii Regulatory Impact Statement – Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY KEY POINTS: In Victoria, recreational game hunting has occurred for over 150 years and remains a popular and culturally significant activity. There are around 41,500 licensed game hunters in Victoria, an increase of over 41 per cent in the last decade. The Department of Primary Industries (DPI) estimates that game hunting generates around $96 million of economic activity in Victoria annually. In line with government policy, in December 2011, Game Victoria was established. Game Victoria will develop strategies and policies for the sustainable harvest of game species and support the promotion of the game hunting sector, including promoting game hunting as a popular recreational activity. Game hunters in Victoria face a range of regulations. It is, therefore, important that the proposed Regulations impose the lowest possible burden on hunters, while achieving government other objectives. Consultation with stakeholders and experience built up over the last 10 years has resulted in a number of changes to the proposed Regulations (see Box 1 on p. 12 for key changes). In almost all instances, the changes to the proposed Regulations will lower the regulatory burden and allow growth in the industry without compromising the Victorian Government’s objectives. Fee levels have been
Recommended publications
  • Kerang Lakes Land and Water Action Group(PDF

    Kerang Lakes Land and Water Action Group(PDF

    SUBMISSION 20 RECEIVED 25/08/2017 Kerang Lakes Land & Water Action Group Submission to the Inquiry into the Management, Governance and Use of Environmental Water August 2017 Kerang Lakes Land and Water Action Group President: Stuart Simms Secretary: Raelene Peel Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Case Studies: Environmental Management Practices within the Kerang Lakes......................................... 4 2.1. Barr Creek Drainage Diversion Scheme Case Study ............................................................................ 5 2.2. Avoca Marshes and ‘The Sill’ - 1969 to 1991 Case Study .................................................................... 7 2.3 Cullen’s Lake Environmental Watering and Bed Flushing Program Case Study ................................. 9 3. Barriers to the efficient use of environmental water ................................................................................ 11 3.1 Infrastructure and capacity issues ..................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Ineffective management of human resources ................................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Failure to utilise local knowledge
  • Final St. Andrew Bay Characterization

    Final St. Andrew Bay Characterization

    1004401.0003.04 Draft St. Andrew Bay Watershed Characterization December 2016 Prepared by: St. Andrew Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 5, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT This document was developed in support of the Surface Water Improvement and Management Program with funding assistance from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. ii St. Andrew Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 5, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT Version History Location(s) in Date Version Summary of Revision(s) Document 6/28/2016 1 All Initial draft Watershed Characterization (Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6) submitted to NWFWMD. 7/14/2016 2 Throughout Numerous edits and comments from District staff 11/18/2016 3 Throughout Numerous revisions to address District comments. 11/23/2016 4 Throughout Numerous edits and comments from District staff 12/5/2016 5 Throughout Numerous revisions to address District comments. L:\Publications\4200-4499\4401-0001_NWFWD iii St. Andrew Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 5, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT This page intentionally left blank. iv St. Andrew Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 5, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 SWIM Program Background, Goals, and Objectives...........................................1
  • Sampling and Analysis of Lakes in the Corangamite CMA Region (2)

    Sampling and Analysis of Lakes in the Corangamite CMA Region (2)

    Sampling and analysis of lakes in the Corangamite CMA region (2) Report to the Corangamite Catchment Management Authority CCMA Project WLE/42-009: Client Report 4 Annette Barton, Andrew Herczeg, Jim Cox and Peter Dahlhaus CSIRO Land and Water Science Report xx/06 December 2006 Copyright and Disclaimer © 2006 CSIRO & Corangamite Catchment Management Authority. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO Land and Water or the Corangamite Catchment Management Authority. Important Disclaimer: CSIRO advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. From CSIRO Land and Water Description: Rocks encrusted with salt crystals in hyper-saline Lake Weering. Photographer: Annette Barton © 2006 CSIRO ISSN: 1446-6171 Report Title Sampling and analysis of the lakes of the Corangamite CMA region Authors Dr Annette Barton 1, 2 Dr Andy Herczeg 1, 2 Dr Jim Cox 1, 2 Mr Peter Dahlhaus 3, 4 Affiliations/Misc 1.
  • Deer Deer Hunting in Victoria

    Deer Deer Hunting in Victoria

    Victorian Hunting Guide 2012 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Quick-find reference tables 3. Licensing 4. General information 5. Compliance and enforcement 6. Use of gundogs and hounds for hunting 7. Duck 8. Deer 9. Stubble Quail 10. Introduced game birds 11. Protected wildlife 12. Pest animals 13. Australian Hunter Survey 14. Where you can hunt 15. Firearms safety 16. Contacts list 17. Sunrise and sunset times (Melbourne) during the 2012 duck season Victorian Hunting Guide: Introduction Welcome to the 2012 Victorian Hunting Guide Victoria offers game hunters world-class opportunities to hunt duck, quail and deer. The Victorian Government is committed to providing even better opportunities for Victoria’s 40,000 licensed hunters to enjoy their recreation and to promote the growth of hunting businesses in regional areas across the State. We will continue to encourage more people to interact with the natural environment and to take advantage of the outstanding opportunities for hunting, fishing and other outdoor activities that Victoria has to offer. We will work closely with the hunting community to achieve these outcomes based on the sustainable management of our game species. To support this new effort, the Victorian Government established Game Victoria as the State’s new game management authority within the Department of Primary Industries. Game Victoria will operate in a similar way to the successful management of recreational fishing in Victoria and reports to me as the responsible Minister. Game Victoria will support promotion of the game hunting sector, particularly focusing on: promoting game hunting as a popular recreational activity, important traditional pastime and generator of jobs developing improved hunting opportunities fostering the development of game-related businesses supporting and contributing to conservation and research projects delivering education and compliance programs developing strategies and policies for sustainable harvest of game species.
  • NORTH CENTRAL WATERWAY STRATEGY 2014-2022 CONTENTS Iii

    NORTH CENTRAL WATERWAY STRATEGY 2014-2022 CONTENTS Iii

    2014-2022 NORTH CENTRAL WATERWAY STRATEGY Acknowledgement of Country The North Central Catchment Management Authority acknowledges Aboriginal Traditional Owners within the region, their rich culture and spiritual connection to Country. We also recognise and acknowledge the contribution and interest of Aboriginal people and organisations in land and natural resource management. Document name: 2014-22 North Central Waterway Strategy North Central Catchment Management Authority PO Box 18 Huntly Vic 3551 T: 03 5440 1800 F: 03 5448 7148 E: [email protected] www.nccma.vic.gov.au © North Central Catchment Management Authority, 2014 A copy of this strategy is also available online at: www.nccma.vic.gov.au The North Central Catchment Management Authority wishes to acknowledge the Victorian Government for providing funding for this publication through the Victorian Waterway Management Strategy. This publication may be of assistance to you, but the North Central Catchment Management Authority (North Central CMA) and its employees do not guarantee it is without flaw of any kind, or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on information in this publication. The North Central Waterway Strategy was guided by a Steering Committee consisting of: • James Williams (Steering Committee Chair and North Central CMA Board Member) • Richard Carter (Natural Resource Management Committee Member) • Andrea Keleher (Department of Environment and Primary Industries) • Greg Smith (Goulburn-Murray Water) • Rohan Hogan (North Central CMA) • Tess Grieves (North Central CMA). The North Central CMA would like to acknowledge the contributions of the Steering Committee, Natural Resource Management Committee (NRMC) and the North Central CMA Board.
  • Regulatory Impact Statement Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Regulatory Impact Statement

    Regulatory Impact Statement Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Regulatory Impact Statement

    Regulatory Impact Statement Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014 Regulatory Impact Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared to fulfil the requirements of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 and to facilitate public consultation on the proposed Wildlife (State Game Reserves) Regulations 2014. In accordance with the Victorian Guide to Regulation, the Victorian Government seeks to ensure that proposed regulations are well-targeted, effective and appropriate, and impose the lowest possible burden on Victorian businesses and the community. A prime function of the RIS process is to help members of the public comment on proposed statutory rules (regulations) before they have been finalised. Such public input can provide valuable information and different perspectives, and thus improve the overall quality of the regulations. The proposed Regulations are available to key stakeholders and any other interested parties, and feedback is now sought. Unless otherwise indicated, all submissions will be treated as public documents and will be made available to other parties upon request, or may be published. Written comments and submissions should be forwarded by 5.00pm, Tuesday 30 September 2014 to – Legislation Unit Land Management Policy Division Department of Environment and Primary Industries PO Box 500 East Melbourne VIC 8002 or email: [email protected] This Regulatory Impact Statement was prepared for the Department of Environment and Primary Industries by Regulatory Impact Solutions Pty Ltd. © The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author.
  • THE FAMILY ANATIDAE 43 Ernst Map

    THE FAMILY ANATIDAE 43 Ernst Map

    March 1945 42 THE WILSON BULLETIN Vol. 57, No. 1 Biziura L lob&, Australian Musk Duck Aberrant Species Thalassornis leuconota, African White-backed Duck Heteronetta atricapilla, Black-headed Duck 7. TRIBE MERGANETTINI. TORRENTDUCKS Merganetta armuta, Torrent Duck GENERA RECOGNIZEDBY PETERS AND SYNONYMIZEDIHERE Arctonetta= Som&eria Metopiana= Netta Asarcornis = Cairina Nesochen= Branta Casarca = Tadorna Nesonetta= Anus Chaulelasmus= Anas Nomonyx = Oxyura Chen = Anser Nyroca= Aythya Cheniscus= Nettapus Oidemia = Melanitta Chenopis= Cygnus Phil&e= Anser Cygnopsis= Anser Polysticta= Somateria Dendronessa= Aix Pseudotadorna= Tadorna Eulabeia= Anser Pteronetta= Cairina Lophodytes= Mergus Salvadorina= Anus Mareca= Anas Spatula= Anas Mergellus = Mergus GENERA RECOGNIZEDHERE BUT NOT BY PETERS Amazonetta von Boetticher (for Anus brasiliensis) Lophonetta Riley (for Anus specularioides) COMPARISONOP CHARACTERS Our studies have shown that the waterfowl can be divided into about nine groups that are fairly well defined both morphologically and biologically. In addition, there are a number of species and genera that are either intermediate between the otherwise well- defined tribes (e.g. Coscoroba) or too poorly known for a safe classi- fication (e.g. Anus specularis, Anus leucophrys, Malacorhynchus, Tachyeres) ; others show peculiarities or a combination of characters that prevent them from fitting well into any of the existing groups. Such genera as the Australian Cereopsis, Anseranas, Stictonetta, and Chenonetta could either be made the sole representatives of so many separate tribes or each could be included in the tribe with which it shares the greatest number of similarities. For the sake of con- venience we have adopted the latter course, but without forgetting that these genera are not typical representatives of the tribes with which we associate them.
  • The Function and Evolution of the Supraorbital Process in Ducks

    The Function and Evolution of the Supraorbital Process in Ducks

    THE FUNCTION AND EVOLUTION OF THE SUPRAORBITAL PROCESS IN DUCKS ROBERTJ. RAIKOW THE anteriormargin of the orbit in ducksis formedby the lacrimalbone, which articulateswith the anterolateralmargin of the frontal boneand the posterodorsalcorner of the maxillary processof the nasal bone. The evolu- tion of this bone in birds generally has been dealt with recently by Cracraft (Amer. Midl. Naturalist, 80: 316, 1968), whoseterminology for the parts of the lacrimal bone is followedhere. In many ducksthe postero- dorsalcorner of the lacrimal is marked by a small tubercle,which serves as the site of attachment of the anterior end of the orbital membrane,a sheetof connectivetissue that coversand protectsthe dorsalaspect of the eyeball. In some forms this tubercle has become elongated to form a stout, finger-like projection, the supraorbitalprocess. This appears to provide mechanicalprotection to the eyeball and salt gland (Figure 1). Table 1 lists the occurrenceand degree of developmentof this process in the skulls of all living generaof ducks. CORRELATION WITH FEEDING AND LOCOMOTOR HABITS In the following discussion,data on feeding habits are from Delacour (The waterfowlof the world,vols. 1-3, London,Country Life Ltd., 1954, 1956, 1959). Table 1 showsthat the supraorbital processis developed significantlyonly in certain groupsof ducks that feed underwater. It is absentor rudimentaryin the Tadornini, Cairinini, and Anatini, which are primarily surfacefeeders, but also in Merganetta arma.ta,the Torrent Duck, which feedsunderwater. In the Aythyini it is fairly well-developed in severalspecies of Aythya, which are excellentdivers, but is rudimentary in Netta peposaca,which is moreof a surfacefeeder. It is alsorudimentary in the Canvasback,Aythya valisineria,which dives for vegetation.Among the Mergini the supraorbitalprocess is highly developedin eiders (Poly- sticta, Somateria) , scoters( M elanitta) , and Long-tailed Duck ( Clangula byemalls), all of which feed mainly on invertebratestaken from the bottom.
  • Wetlands Australia © Commonwealth of Australia, 2017

    Wetlands Australia © Commonwealth of Australia, 2017

    Wetlands Australia © Commonwealth of Australia, 2017. Wetlands Australia is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘Wetlands Australia, Commonwealth of Australia 2017’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Energy. ii / Wetlands Australia Contents Introduction 1 Wetlands and climate change: impacts and building resilience to natural hazards. Working together for the Great Barrier Reef 2 Ridding the river of blackberries: revegetation for climate change resilience 3 Climate risk and adaptation strategies at a coastal Ramsar wetland 5 Managing coastal wetlands under climate change 7 Inland wetland rehabilitation to mitigate climate change impacts 9 Constructed wetlands for drought disaster mitigation 11 Wetland management tools: science, modelling and assessment. Our northern wetlands: science to support a sustainable future 13 Predicting the occurrence of seasonal herbaceous wetlands in south east Australia 15 Models of wetland connectivity: Supporting a landscape scale approach to wetland management 17 Lake Eyre Basin Condition Assessment 2016 19 “Where are the wetlands in NSW?” A new semi-automated method for mapping wetlands 20 Method for the long-term monitoring of wetlands in Victoria 22 Muir-Byenup Ramsar wetlands: Are they changing? 24 Looking below the surface of the Vasse Wonnerup wetlands 26 Indigenous values and connection to wetlands.
  • Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan

    Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan

    Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan Department of Sustainability and Environment Parks Victoria developed this Strategic Management Plan in conjunction with the Department of Sustainability and Environment and key stakeholders, and coordinated the public comment process on the draft document. This report was prepared with financial support from the National Wetlands Program, under the Natural Heritage Trust. © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior permission of the State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment. All requests and enquiries should be directed to the Copyright Officer, Library Information Services, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 5/250 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been made to ensure that the information in the report is accurate. The Department of Sustainability and Environment does not guarantee that the report is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence, which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Commonwealth Government of Australia, the Federal Minister for Environment and Heritage, or the Department of the Environment and Heritage.
  • NOTES on SUBFOSSIL ANAHDAE from NEW ZEALAND, INCLUDING a NEW SPECBES of PINK-EARED DUCK MALACORHYNCHUS STOR&S L. OLSON Recei

    NOTES on SUBFOSSIL ANAHDAE from NEW ZEALAND, INCLUDING a NEW SPECBES of PINK-EARED DUCK MALACORHYNCHUS STOR&S L. OLSON Recei

    fM NOTES ON SUBFOSSIL ANAHDAE FROM NEW ZEALAND, INCLUDING A NEW SPECBES OF PINK-EARED DUCK MALACORHYNCHUS STOR&S L. OLSON Received 3 October 1976. SUMMARY OLSON, S. L. 1977. Notes on subfossil Anatidae from New Zealand, including a new species of pink-eared duck Malacorhynchus. Emu 77: 132-135. A new species of pink-eared duck, Malacorhynchus scarletti, is described from subfossil deposits at Pyra- mid Valley, South Island, NZ, and is characterized by larger size. Preliminary observations indicate that subfossil specimens of Biziura from New Zealand are larger and differ qualitatively from B. lobata; for the present, the name Biziura delautouri Forbes, 1892, ought to be retained for the New Zealand form. An erroneous record of Mergus australis is corrected. INTRODUCTION Locality. Pyramid Valley Swamp, near Waikari, During two visits to museums in New Zealand, I North Canterbury, South Island, NZ. examined remains of numerous fossil and subfossil Age. Holocene; the bone-bearing sediments at birds, including those of several extinct species of Pyramid Valley Swamp have been determined by ducks. Of these, the form known as Euryanas finschi radio-carbon dating to be about 3,500 years old was represented by thousands of specimens and I (Gregg 1972). plan to treat its osteology and relationships in a Etymology. I take pleasure in naming this new subsequent study. Three other species are the subject species for R. J. Scarlett, osteologist at the Canter- of the present paper. bury Museum, in recognition of his significant con- tributions to New Zealand palaeornithology. MALACORHYNCHUS Diagnosis. Much larger than M, membranaceus In a report on avian remains from Pyramid Valley (see Table I).
  • A HISTORY of SALINITY MANAGEMENT in the GOULBURN VALLEY, 1886-2007. HILARY SUSAN HOWES BA(Hons)

    A HISTORY of SALINITY MANAGEMENT in the GOULBURN VALLEY, 1886-2007. HILARY SUSAN HOWES BA(Hons)

    FROM COMMISSION TO COMMUNITY: A HISTORY OF SALINITY MANAGEMENT IN THE GOULBURN VALLEY, 1886-2007. Study area: Goulburn Valley, Victoria, Australia. Map courtesy Peter Smith, Spatial Vision. HILARY SUSAN HOWES BA(Hons)/BSC, Dip.Mod.Lang. A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts. March 2007. Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Melbourne Abstract This thesis investigates the evolution of government and public roles in salinity management within the Goulburn Valley, an important agricultural region of north- central Victoria. I argue that approaches to salinity management in the Goulburn Valley have altered over time to reflect variations in the connection between government and local communities. From 1905, the Victorian Government (as represented through its administrative body for water resources, the State Rivers and Water Supply Commission (SRWSC)) was led by a combination of developmentalist ideology and financial caution to install throughout north-central Victoria the fatal combination of extensive irrigation systems without adequate drainage. Despite early evidence of salinity problems resulting from their actions, the SRWSC did not experience a serious challenge to its institutionalised pattern of top-down advice and authority until the 1970s, when proposals for large-scale evaporative disposal schemes for salinity management met with angry responses from the farming community. Following an examination of community responses to two of the most controversial of these, the Lake Tyrrell and Mineral Reserve Basins salinity management schemes, I re-evaluate the subsequent Girgarre salinity control project in its historical context as a turning-point in government attitudes to community consultation.