DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Australian State Election 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western Australian State Election 2001 WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY Western Australian State Election 2001 Election Papers Series No. 2 / 2001 PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIAN STATE ELECTION 2001 by Antony Green for the Western Australian Parliamentary Library Western Australian Parliamentary Library Election Papers Series no. 2/2001 June 2001 2001 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent from the Librarian, Western Australian Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the Western Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Western Australian Parliamentary Library. Western Australian Parliamentary Library Parliament House Harvest Terrace Perth WA 6000 ISBN 0 7307 6101 0 June 2001 The Author Antony Green is the Election Analyst for ABC Television, and has worked for the ABC on every Federal, State and Territory election since 1989. He has prepared numerous publications on electoral matters for the New South Wales and Queensland Parliamentary Libraries, and writes regularly on politics and electoral matters for the Sydney Morning Herald. Antony studied at Sydney University, obtaining a Bachelor of Science in mathematics and computing, and a Bachelor of Economics with Honours in Politics. Related Publications • Western Australian State Elections 1996 by Antony Green. Election papers series 1/2001. WESTERN AUSTRALIAN STATE ELECTION 10 February 2001 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Legislative Assembly Results Summary of Legislative Assembly Election 5 Legislative Assembly Results by Electoral Division 8 Summary of Two-Party Preferred Results 22 Regional Summaries 28 Analysis of Preferences in the Legislative Assembly 30 Legislative Council Results Summary of Legislative Council Election 35 Detail of Result by Region 38 Comparison of Assembly and Council Vote 44 Symbols .. Nil or rounded to zero *SittingMPs .… ‘Ghost’ candidate, where a party contesting the previous election did not nominate for the current election Party Abbreviations (blank) Non-affiliated candidates ALPAustralian Labor Party CDPChristian Democratic Party CLA Curtin Labor Alliance (+) DEM Australian Democrats GRN The Greens (WA) IND Independents LFF Liberals for Forests (+) LIB Liberal Party NAT National Party ONPPauline Hanson’s One Nation OTH Others SEN Seniors Party (+) (+) Denotes parties not registered with the Western Australian Electoral Commission. Important Dates Issue of Writs 10 January 2001 Close of Rolls 18 January 2001, 6:00pm Close of Nominations 19 January 2001, 6:00pm Lodgment of Council Ticket Votes 22 January 2001, 6:00pm Polling Day 10 February 2001 Close of Receipt for Postal Votes 13 February 2001 Last day for Return of Writs 9 March 2001 Western Australian State Election 2001 INTRODUCTION This paper contains a summary of the 2001 Western Australian election. It contains details of voting for all Legislative Assembly districts, initial analysis of Assembly preference flows, as well as summaries of voting for the Legislative Council. For each Legislative Assembly electorate, details of the total primary and two-candidate preferred vote are provided. Where appropriate, a two-party preferred count is also included. The format for the results is as follows: First Count: For each candidate, the total primary vote received is shown. Percentage votes are calculated as a percentage of the formal vote for each electorate. Swing is calculated by subtracting the percentage vote received by a party at the 1996 election from the percentage received at the 2001 election. Where the parties contesting the district differ from the 1996 election, ‘ghost’ candidates (indicated by “….”) have been included representing candidates not contesting the current election. As a result, all primary swings add to zero, subject to rounding errors. Final Count: Represents the two-candidate preferred count after the final distribution of preferences in an electorate. All formal votes that did not indicate a preference for the final two candidates are included in the total listed as exhausted. Two-candidate preferred percentages are calculated by dividing the two-candidate preferred vote for a candidate by the total votes remaining in the count, that is the formal votes minus the total of exhausted votes. Two-candidate preferred swings are shown compared to the results of the 1996 election. Where the party composition of the final two candidates differs from the 1996 election (eg Alfred Cove), a ghost candidate appears, and three swing figures are shown. Separate two-party preferred counts are also included in several electorates. Exhausted Votes Under the WA Electoral Act, ballot papers with a valid first preference vote, but with duplicate numbering in subsequent preferences, remain in the count as formal votes. This type of vote is often termed a ‘Langer’ vote, after the political activist who advocated voting in this manner when the same formality rules applied for Commonwealth elections. During the distribution of preferences, it will not always be possible to determine the next available preference for ballot papers with duplicate preference numbering. As a result, these votes are set aside as ‘exhausted’ preferences at the point in the count where the next available preference cannot be determined. They are not counted towards the final two-candidate preferred count for an electorate. After the distribution of preferences, a candidate is declared elected if he or she receives 50% of the votes remaining in the count, that is the formal vote less the total number of exhausted preferences. Note that where both two-candidate and two-party preferred counts are provided for an electorate, the total number of exhausted votes may be different for the two counts. In the result tables, two-candidate and two-party preferred percentages are calculated as a percentage of votes remaining in the count. An exhausted vote total is also shown, along with a percentage exhausted vote, calculated by dividing the total exhausted vote by the formal vote. Two-Candidate Preferred versus Two-Party Preferred Results The two-candidate preferred count for an electorate is defined as the final tally after the exclusion and distribution as preferences of votes from all other candidates. At each stage of the count, the candidate with the least votes is excluded, and his or her votes are distributed to candidates remaining in the count based on the voter's preferences as filled in on the ballot paper. To achieve victory, a candidate must receive more than 50% of the vote remaining in the count, though in electorates where a candidate achieves victory either on the primary vote or before the final distribution of preferences, a two-candidate preferred count is carried out in full for information purposes. The two-party preferred count represents a distribution of preferences between candidates representing the Labor Party and the Liberal-National Party Coalition. Candidates are again excluded 1 Western Australian State Election 2001 based on lowest progressive vote, though at some points the second lowest candidate is excluded to retain candidates representing Labor and the Coalition. In most cases, the two-party preferred count will be the same as the two-candidate preferred count. However, at the 2001 election, the final distribution of preferences in 11 electorates did not represent a two-party preferred contest, and in most of these electorates, the West Australian Electoral Commission carried out additional two-party preferred counts for information purposes. Two-party preferred votes and percentages are familiar in Australian election analysis from their use in electoral pendulums to show the relative safety of seats, and also to illustrate the notional swing required in marginal seats for a change of government. A statewide two-party preferred count, calculated by summing the two-party preferred counts in individual electorates, has often been used to measure any discrepancy between seats won and votes received by governments and oppositions. However, it must be stressed that the two-candidate preferred count is the real result in each electorate. Given that 11 electorates did not finish as a two-party contest, analysis of the statewide two-party preferred totals is a theoretical exercise not connected with the actual decisions made by voters in electorates. A table of statewide two-party preferred results is provided on pages 22-23, and for comparison purposes, a statewide two-candidate preferred count has also been calculated. In the following electorates, the assumptions made to create a two-party preferred vote need some explanation. Alfred Cove: The Labor Party did not nominate a candidate for the 2001 election, and the two- candidate preferred contest took place between Liberal Party candidate Doug Shave and Liberals for Forests candidate Janet Woollard. The Western Australian Electoral Commission (WAEC) also conducted a distribution of preferences between Shave and Independent Denise Brailey, and this count has been adopted as the notional two-party preferred count in the relevant tables. As an independent also finished second at the 1996 election, the WAEC's 1996 two-party preferred count is used where appropriate. Armadale: The Liberal Party did not nominate a candidate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Election Preparation
    3 Election Preparation 3.1 The period between the calling of an election and polling day is a period of intense activity on the part of the AEC, political parties and candidates. This activity includes the formal requirements for calling the election and nominating candidates, as well as publicity and advertising. Notification of an election and election writs 3.2 The AEC raised concerns about a number of formalities, namely: how it is notified of a forthcoming election; its role in preparing election writs; and the method of certifying the names of the successful candidates on the writs.1 3.3 The following outlines the context in which these concerns arise, followed by consideration of the submissions on these points. The role of election writs in an election 3.4 An election writ is a legal document that ‘commands’ an electoral officer to hold an election, and specifies the dates for the close of rolls, the close of nominations, polling day and the return of that writ. 1 Submission (AEC, no. 147), pp. 9-11, Transcript of Evidence, 16 August 2002 (Mr A Becker), pp. EM68-70. 98 3.5 The provisions governing election writs are detailed in sections 12 and 32 of the Constitution, and Part XIII of the Electoral Act. The function of election writs and how they fit in to the stages of an election is described below.2 Determination of an election date 3.6 Under the Constitution, the Governor-General has the power to prorogue the Parliament and dissolve the House of Representatives.3 However, as a matter of convention, the Prime Minister determines when he or she wishes an election to be held, subject to the constitutional requirement that the term of the House of Representatives shall be a maximum of three years.4 It is the convention that the Prime Minister visit the Governor-General to request that an election be held on the date chosen by the Prime Minister.5 In 2001, the Prime Minister visited the Governor-General on Friday, 5 October, and announced the election date the same day.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and the Australian Labour Movement 1920-1955
    Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context. It is written from the per­ spective of one who joined the Communist Movement 1920-1955 Party of Australia because it seemed the only party 'committed to the struggle for socialism and against fascism' and who left it because Robin Gollan this 'no longer seemed the case'. Its breadth, perceptiveness, and understanding com­ mend it to all people concerned w ith the con­ tinuing political struggles of the Right, the Left, and the Centre. Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Funding and Disclosure Election Report
    Section17 Final 7/2/05 10:22 AM Page i FUNDING AND DISCLOSURE REPORT Election 2001 Section17 Final 7/2/05 10:22 AM Page ii © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth, available from the Department of Communication, Information Technology and the Arts. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Intellectual Property Branch, Department of Communication, Information Technology and the Arts, GPO Box 2154, Canberra ACT 2601, or posted at w w w. d c i t a . g o v. a u / c c a . ISBN: 18770 3 2 9 9 9 Contact us: Funding and Disclosure Australian Electoral Commission West Block Offices Queen Victoria Te r r a c e Pa r kes ACT 2600 PO Box 61 7 2 Kingston ACT 2604 P h : (02) 6271 4552 F a x : (02) 6271 4555 Email: f a d @ a e c . g o v. a u Web: h t t p : / / w w w. a e c . g o v. a u / Section17 Final 7/2/05 10:22 AM Page iii C O N T E N T S INTRODUCTION 1 ELECTION FUNDING 2 FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 5 COMPLIANCE REVIEW 1 5 PARTY REGISTRATION 1 7 LEGISLATIVE REVIEW 2 0 APPENDICES 21 Appendix 1 - 2001 Election Funding Pa y m e n t s 21 Appendix 2 - Registered Political Pa r t i e s 2 2 Appendix 3 - Donors and Third Pa r t i e s 2 3 Key abbreviations A E C Australian Electoral Commission J S C E M Parliamentary Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters The Ac t Commonwealth Electoral Act 191 8 Section17 Final 7/2/05 10:22 AM Page 1 I N T R O D U C T I O N This report on the operation of the election funding and financial disclosure provisions of Part XX of the Commonwealth Electoral Ac t 1 91 8 (the Act) is prepared for the purposes of subsection 17(2) of the Act in relation to the 2001 Federal election.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Electoral Commission Supplementary
    AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION SUPPLEMENTARY SUBMISSION TO THE JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL MATTERS’ INQUIRY INTO THE 2001 FEDERAL ELECTION MULTIPLE VOTERS AND OTHER MATTERS Canberra 2 June 2003 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 3 2. Dual and multiple voting........................................................................ 3 3. Delivery of Postal Vote Applications (PVAs) ....................................... 6 4. Privacy and access issues.................................................................... 7 5. Registration of Curtin Labor Alliance................................................. 11 6. Expenditure on the 1998 federal election public awareness campaign ............................................................................................. 12 2 Multiple voters and other matters 1. Introduction 1.1 This submission by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is presented to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) in response to its 'inquiry into the conduct of the 2001 federal election', as advertised in the national press on 25 May 2002. 1.2 The submission contains commentary on the dual and multiple voter statistics for the 2001 federal election and AEC responses to questions on notice provided by the JSCEM in April and May 2003. 1.3 The AEC has on previous occasions commented on issues similar to those responded to here. Where this has occurred, the submission provides references to those
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Inc. B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation
    ON UOlsSjwqn 6 8 SJG445V~IeJo~eI3uO QOUIUJUJOO ugpu5~sWIOI’ B’nai B’rith Australia!New Zealand 1 October 2002 The Secretary, Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters, Parliament of Australia Canberra, ACT 2600 Dear Madam, B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Re: Unsuitability of the Citizens Electoral Council to continue to be registered as a Commission Inc. political party in Australia. P0 Box 450, Caulfield South, Victoria. Australia 3162 The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission Inc. tel: (03) 9527 1228 fax: (03) 9525 9127 (ADC) is the human rights arm of B’nai B’rith antidef@optusnetcom.au Australia/New Zealand. Its central purpose is to oppose racism and anti-Semitism and to expose BOARD the activities of extremist organisations that Chairman: contribute to disharmony in multicultural societies. Dr Paul Gardner Vice-chairman: Professor Andrew Markus The ADC argues in the enclosed submission that Secretary: Miriam Suss the rules of the Australian Electoral Commission Treasurer: should be tightened in order to prevent unfit Eric Cohen Members: organisations such as the Citizens Electoral Dr Dvir Abramovich Council from continuing to enjoy the status of a Dr George Deutsch Ernie Friedlander political party in Australia. Kurt Rathner President, We request your Standing Committee to consider B’nai B’rithAustralia!NewZealand: this request. James Altman STAFF Yours sincerely Senior Research Analyst: Dr Rodney Gouttman Liaison Officer: Annette Glactwin Executive Secretary: (Di) Paul Gardner Emma Oshlack Chairman BOARD OF ADVISERS B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission Inc. The RI Hon Sir Zelman Cowen AK GCMG GCVO QC DCL (03) 9578 4724; 0412 275 623 The Rt Hon Malcolm Fraser AC CH The Hon RJL Hawke AC Dr Lowitja ODonoghue AC CBE The RI Hon Sir Ninian Stephen KG AK GCMG GCVO KBE The Hon Neville Wren AC QC Sir Walter Campbell AC ABN 67404034406 Registration No.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL FINANCE Annual Report
    POLITICAL FINANCE Annual Report Report on the operation of Part VI of the Electoral Act 1907 for the period ended 30 June 2003 Hon. J A McGinty MLA Attorney General Minister for Electoral Affairs 30th Floor Allendale Square 77 St George’s Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Dear Minister In accordance with section 175ZG of the Electoral Act 1907, I submit for your information and presentation to Parliament the report on the operation of Part VI of the Electoral Act 1907 for the period 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2003. Yours sincerely Warwick Gately AM ACTING ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER 20 July 2004 ISSN 1441-1296 Copyright © 2004 Western Australian Electoral Commission Level 2, 111 St George’s Terrace PERTH WA 6000 GPO Box F316 PERTH WA 6841 Telephone: (08) 9214 0400 or 13 63 06 Facsimile: (08) 9226 0577 Email: waec@waec.wa.gov.au Internet: www.waec.wa.gov.au Telephone Typewriter (TTY): (08) 9214 0487 POLITICAL FINANCE Annual Report 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................1 1.1 Essential Features of the Political Finance Legislation.............................1 1.2 Records to be Kept...................................................................................3 1.3 Role of the Western Australian Electoral Commissioner ..........................3 2. 2002-2003 ANNUAL RETURNS .......................................................................4 3. AUDIT OF RETURNS .......................................................................................4 4. ACCESS
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL FINANCE Annual Report Report on the Operation of Part VI Of
    POLITICAL FINANCE Annual Report Report on the operation of Part VI of the Electoral Act 1907 for the period ended 30 June 2002 Hon J A McGinty MLA Attorney General Minister for Electoral Affairs 30th Floor Allendale Square 77 St George’s Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Dear Minister In accordance with section 175ZG of the Electoral Act 1907, I submit for your information and presentation to Parliament the report on the operation of Part VI of the Electoral Act 1907 for the period 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002. Yours sincerely Lyn Auld ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER 26 June 2003 ISSN 1441-1296 Copyright © 2003 Western Australian Electoral Commission Level 2, 111 St George’s Terrace PERTH WA 6000 GPO Box F316 PERTH WA 6841 Telephone: (08) 9214 0400 or 13 63 06 Facsimile: (08) 9226 0577 Email: waec@waec.wa.gov.au Internet: www.waec.wa.gov.au Telephone Typewriter (TTY): (08) 9214 0487 POLITICAL FINANCE Report 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND ...............................................................................1 1.1 Essential Features of the Political Finance Legislation ............................. 1 1.2 Records to be Kept ................................................................................... 3 1.3 Role of the Western Australian Electoral Commissioner .......................... 3 2. 2001-2002 ANNUAL RETURNS ......................................................4 3. BY–ELECTION RETURNS ..............................................................4 4. AUDIT OF RETURNS ......................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • New Leadership for a Time of Crisis: Australia's Curtin Labor Alliance
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 27, Number 19, May 12, 2000 New Leadership for a Time of Crisis: Australia’s Curtin Labor Alliance by Allen Douglas Over the weekend of April 29-30, one hundred and ten Austra- Franklin Roosevelt and Gen. Douglas MacArthur, “an lian citizens gathered in Perth, the capital of the state of West- America which Australians have not seen much of in recent ern Australia, to form a new political party, the Curtin Labor decades,” Bennett introduced Lyndon LaRouche, “the Alliance (CLA). Founded as a statewide organization in world’s leading economist,” of whom “the global financial Western Australia, the new party has great potential to spread oligarchy is terrified, because he not only forecast the present nationwide, and is dedicated to concluding the unfinished global financial crisis over three decades ago, but he has de- business of Australian history: conducting a political revolu- signed a solution to it, known as the New Bretton Woods tion against the British Crown and the City of London—what international monetary system.” LaRouche and his associ- the old Labor Party of wartime Prime Minister John Curtin ates, explained Bennett, were framed up and thrown in prison called “the Money Power.” by the global oligarchy, just as Australia’s union organizers The conference was co-sponsored by the associates of were thrown in jail during the 1890s depression, and even Lyndon LaRouche in Australia, the Citizens Electoral Coun- killed, “for simply organizing for a better life for working cil (CEC), and the Executive of the Municipal Employees people.” Such jail sentences, he said, were “a badge of honor, Union of Western Australia (MEU); prominent members of a testament to the unshakable courage and commitment of Perth’s Islamic and Chinese communities also attended.
    [Show full text]
  • PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of Political Party Regulation in Australia
    PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia Edited by Anika Gauja and Marian Sawer Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: anupress@anu.edu.au This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Party rules? : dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia / editors: Anika Gauja, Marian Sawer. ISBN: 9781760460761 (paperback) 9781760460778 (ebook) Subjects: Political parties--Australia. Political parties--Law and legislation--Australia. Political participation--Australia. Australia--Politics and government. Other Creators/Contributors: Gauja, Anika, editor. Sawer, Marian, 1946- editor. Dewey Number: 324.2994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. This edition © 2016 ANU Press Contents Figures . vii Tables . ix Abbreviations . xi Acknowledgements . xiii Contributors . xv 1 . Party rules: Promises and pitfalls . 1 Marian Sawer and Anika Gauja 2 . Resisting legal recognition and regulation: Australian parties as rational actors? . 37 Sarah John 3 . Party registration and political participation: Regulating small and ‘micro’ parties . .73 Norm Kelly 4 . Who gets what, when and how: The politics of resource allocation to parliamentary parties . 101 Yvonne Murphy 5 . Putting the cartel before the house? Public funding of parties in Queensland . 123 Graeme Orr 6 . More regulated, more level? Assessing the impact of spending and donation caps on Australian State elections .
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council
    Legislative Council Thursday, 14 September 2000 THE PRESIDENT (Hon George Cash) took the Chair at 11.00 am, and read prayers. STATE WORKPLACE AGREEMENTS Motion Resumed from 13 September on the following motion moved by Hon N.F. Moore (Leader of the House) - That this House calls on the Opposition to repudiate demands by the union movement and the federal Australian Labor Party to scrap state workplace agreements and acknowledge that its opposition to state workplace agreements since 1993 has been ideologically driven and dictated by the union movement. HON N.F. MOORE (Mining and Pastoral - Leader of the House) [11.03 am]: I will not take up the time of the House for much longer on this issue. We on this side of the House are having some difficulty understanding what the Labor Party is about in respect of this very important issue. Yesterday Hon Tom Helm gave us some indication that the unions were not opposed to workplace agreements, but I suspect the word that is missing out of all this is the word “individual”. What we will probably get from the Labor Party is a policy which says that workplace agreements are all right provided everybody has the same one, which bears a remarkable similarity to the old award system that it replaced. If that is what the Labor Party is going to do it should come clean and tell everybody so that the mining industry, the tourism industry or the hospitality industry is not led up the garden path through the Labor Party suggesting that in some way or other its industrial relations policy will allow for individual workplace agreements to continue to be available to workers in Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2001 Federal Election
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia The 2001 Federal Election Report of the Inquiry into the conduct of the 2001 Federal Election, and matters related thereto Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters June 2003 Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 ISBN Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................................vii Membership of the Committee................................................................................................................. xi Terms of reference..................................................................................................................................xiii List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................................xv List of recommendations........................................................................................................................xvii Executive summary............................................................................................................................... xxv Chapter one – Introduction .......................................................................................................xxv Chapter two – The Electoral Roll............................................................................................xxvii Chapter three – Election Preparation ....................................................................................xxxii
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 27, Number 20, May 19, 2000
    EIR Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Editorial Board: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Muriel Mirak-Weissbach, Antony Papert, Gerald From the Associate Editor Rose, Dennis Small, Edward Spannaus, Nancy Spannaus, Jeffrey Steinberg, William Wertz Associate Editors: Ronald Kokinda, Susan Welsh Managing Editor: John Sigerson here is truly a mind-boggling disparity between events surround- Science Editor: Marjorie Mazel Hecht T Special Projects: Mark Burdman ing the U.S. Presidential election campaign, and reality. I am not Book Editor: Katherine Notley generally given to citing the British press as a means to give our Photo Editor: Stuart Lewis Circulation Manager: Stanley Ezrol readers insight into the political situation, but the cover of the latest INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORS: London Economist sums it up pretty well: Two cartooned babies in Asia and Africa: Linda de Hoyos diapers, Al Gore and George W. Bush, are bauling and battling one Counterintelligence: Jeffrey Steinberg, Paul Goldstein another in the nursery, under a headline that reads, “They’re Fighting Economics: Marcia Merry Baker, over Foreign Policy!” William Engdahl History: Anton Chaitkin That is what the rest of the world sees, with amazement, when Ibero-America: Robyn Quijano, Dennis Small they look at America. People spending the money that was supposed Law: Edward Spannaus Russia and Eastern Europe: to pay the rent, in order to buy lottery tickets. Day-traders at the stock Rachel Douglas, Konstantin George market popping Prozac, so as not to get “stressed out” when the lows United States: Debra Freeman, Suzanne Rose get too low, or the highs get too high. INTERNATIONAL BUREAUS: Bogota´: Jose´ Restrepo When will the insanity stop? Bonn: George Gregory, Rainer Apel Lyndon LaRouche, in a speech published in this issue, warns Buenos Aires: Gerardo Tera´n Caracas: David Ramonet that we are entering the “terminal phase” of the financial breakdown Copenhagen: Poul Rasmussen crisis.
    [Show full text]