FINANCIAL EXCLUSIONS IN A HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED INSTITUTION (HDI)
by
NONHLANHLA HERIEGLIETIAS MABUZA
MINI-DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
MAGISTER EDUCATIONIS
in
EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT
in the
FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND NURSING
at the
RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY
SUPERVISOR : PROF TC BISSCHOFF CO-SUPERVISOR : PROF ESG GREYLING DECLARATION
I Nonhlanhla Herieglietias Mabuza declare that this research essay represents my own work in conception and execution. All sources that I have used or quoted, have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. DEDICATION
I dedicate this work to my parents RAPHAEL AND MARIA MABUZA and my son LUVUYO NCEBA MHLANE
ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study would not have been accomplished without the generous contribution of many individuals. I wish to express my sincere appreciation to:
Prof. Tom Bisschoff and Prof. Liz Greyling for their expert guidance, encouragement and patience throughout the study. Their constructive criticism motivated me to complete this dissertation.
My parents, Raphael and Maria Mabuza, who encouraged me to enhance my studies.
My brothers, Magugu, Thabo, Themba and Pule, who were always available with vital help when I needed it.
My son, Luvuyo, who for most of his life, shared some of the attention with my studies.
My sister-in-law, Lindiwe Mabuza, for her understanding and unwavering support.
Thabo Sephiri, for being at my side in thick and thin.
To my friends, whose support and inspiration gave me courage to go on.
My colleagues, Kate Mazibuko and Nombini Nteyi, for their encouragement and support.
And last, but not least, I thank the almighty God for carrying me through to the realisation of this dream.
iii ABSTRACT
This research project deals with an investigation of the causes of financial exclusions at a Historically Disadvantaged Institution (HD!). Two different institutions of higher learning namely: the University of the North at Qwaqwa (UNIQWA) and the Rand Afrikaans University (RAU) were selected for the study. UNIQWA, as the Historically Disadvantaged Institution, and RAU, as the Historically Advantaged Institution.
Currently, the institutions of higher learning, especially, the historically disadvantaged institutions, are characterised by class disruptions that lead to retarded academic progress during most academic years, the main reason being financial exclusion faced by students in these institutions.
FINDINGS
From the interviews I conducted that included, among others, students, administrators, academics, management and a literature study, the following are some of the important findings of the research project.
Students and parents don't plan for their education. Students don't perform to their utmost best academically. Students don't seek information. Students don't prioritise their needs. Institutions don't seek sponsorship for students. Institutions are too lenient to students.
iv RECOMMENDATIONS
4 Students should work hard towards their studies. Students should build their character, for institutions and sponsors to invest in them. Students should seek information themselves, both inside and outside their institutions. Institutions should not register students without the stipulated fees. Institutions should build reserves for needy students. Institutions should not make political decisions that are not financially viable. The government should increase the National Student Financial Aid Scheme allocation. The government should consider canceling the debt incurred by the institutions of higher learning during the apartheid era.
The findings and recommendations of this research will hopefully provide a strong base upon which students, administrators, academics and management can improve the finance position of institutions of higher learning.
v OPSOMMING
Hierdie navorsongsprojek handel oor 'n ondersoek na die oorsake van finansiele uitsluiting aan 'n Histories-benadeelde Instelling. Twee hoer onderwys,instellings naamlik die Universiteit van die Noorde, Qwaqwa (UNIQWA) en die Randse Afrikaanse Universiteit is vir hierdie studie geselekteer.
Tans word van hoeronderwys instellings gekenmerk deur klasontwrigting wat lei tot vertraagde akademiese vordering gedurende die akademiese jaar, hoofsaaklik as gevolg van die finansiele uitsluiting van studente aan hierdie instellings.
BEVINDINGE
Voortspruitend uit die onderhoude wat ek gevoer het met studente, akademici, administrateurs en bestuur, asook 'n literatuurstudie wat onderneem is, het die volgende bevindinge na aanleiding van die navorsingsprojek aan die lig gekom:
Studente en ouers beplan nie vir onderwys nie. Studente presteer nie akademies tot hul uiterse beste nie. Studente vra nie inligting nie. Studente prioritiseer nie hul behoeftes nie. Instellings anderhandel nie vir borgskappe vir studente nie. Instellings is to toegeeflik teenoor studente.
AANBEVELINGS
Studente moet harder werk aan hulle studies. Studente moet karakterbou beoefen sodat instelling en borge in hulle sal bele. Studente moet self inligting soek, beide binne en buite hul instellings;
vi Instellings moet nie studente Iaat inskryf sonder dat hulle die voorgeskrewe fooie betaal het nie. Instellings moet reserwes opbou vir behoeftige studente. Instelling behoort nie politieke besluite te neem wat nie finansieel Iewensvatbaar is nie. Die regering moet die toewysing aan die National Student Financial Aid Scheme verhoog. Die regering behoort oorweging te skenk aan die afskrywing van skuld wat gedurende die apartheidsera by hodronderwys instellings opgeloop het.
Die bevindinge en aanbevelings van hierdie navorsing sal hopelik 'n goeie grondsiag verskaf, sodat studente, administrateurs, akademici en bestuur toestande in inrigtings van hoeronderwys sal kan verbeter.
VII LIST OF ACRONYMS
AF APPORTIONMENT FACTOR ANC AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS BCSA BURSARY COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA COUD CENTRE des OEUVRES UNIVERSITAIRES de DAKAR DSCI DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS COST INDEX DSI DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS INDEX FCS FULL COST OF STUDY HAI HISTORICALLY ADVANTAGED INSTITUTION HBI HISTORICALLY BLACK INSTITUTION HDI HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED INSTITUTION HED HEAD OF DEPARTMENT HOD HEAD OF DEPARTMENT LLB BACCALAUREUS LEGUM NCHE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION NETF NATIONAL EDUCATION TRAINING FORUM NSFAS NATIONAL STUDENT FINANCIAL AID SCHEME RAU RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY SAPSE SOUTH AFRICAN POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION SAIRR SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS SASCO SOUTH AFRICAN STUDENTS CONGRESS SAUVCA SOUTH AFRICAN VICE CHANCELLORS ASSOCIATION TEFSA TERTIARY EDUCATION FUND OF SOUTH AFRICA TELP TERTIARY EDUCATION LEARNING PROGRAMME UNIQWA UNIVERSITY OF THE NORTH AT QWAQWA USA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
viii TABLE OF CONTENT
PAGE Declaration i Dedication ii Acknowledgement iii Abstract iv Opsomming vi List of Acronyms viii
CHAPTER ONE: ORIENTATION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT 2 1.3 AIM OF THE RESEARCH 5 1.4 METHOD OF RESEARCH 5 1.4.1 Document analysis 6 1.4.2 Data collection 6 1.4.3 Data analysis 6 1.4.4 Population 7 1.5 DEMARCATION OF THE INVESTIGATION 8 1.5.1 University of the North at Qwaciwa (UNIQWA) 8 1.5.2 Rand Afrikaans University (RAU) 8 1.6 CLARIFICATION OF CONCEPTS 9 1.6.1 Financial exclusion 9 1.6.2 Financial aid 9 1.7 PLAN OF STUDY 9 1.8 CONCLUSION 10
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 INTRODUCTION 11 2.2 OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND 11
ix 2.3 FUNDING OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS 14 2.3.1 Principle of shared costs 15 2.3.2 Principle of equity and redress 16 2.3.3 Principle of development 16 2.3.4 Principle of efficiency, sustainability and quality 16 2.4 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING PRACTICES 17 2.4.1 Formula funding 17 2.4.2 Budgetary funding 17 2.4.3 Full funding of all activities 17 2.5 GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL AND FUNDING MECHANISMS IN 18 OTHER COUNTRIES 2.6 STATE FUNDING IN OTHER COUNTRIES 19 2.6.1 Senegal 19 2.6.2 The Philippines 12 2.6.3 The United States of America (USA) 20 2.7 TYPES OF STUDENT LOAN PROGRAMMES 21 2.7.1 Mortgage type loan 21 2.7.2 Graduated nominal payment 21 2.7.3 Income contingent loan 21 2.8 THE MODEL OF FUNDING IN SOUTH AFRICA 22 2.9 WHO QUALIFIES FOR NATIONAL STUDENT FINANCIAL AID 23 SCHEME LOANS? 2.10 CRITERIA FOR ALLOCATIONS BY NSFAS TO TERTIARY 23 INSTITUTIONS 2.11 SUMMARY 25 2.12 CONCLUSION 25
CHAPTER THREE: EMPIRICAL DESIGN 3.1 INTRODUCTION 27 3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN 27 3.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 28 3.3.1 Literature review 29 3.3.2 Field notes 29 3.3.3 Sampling procedure 29 3.3.3.1Selection of participants 30 3.3.3.2 Focus group interview guide 30 3.3.4 Individual interviews 32 3.3.4.1Selection of participants 32 3.3.4.2 Individual interview guide 32 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS 32 3.4.1 The process of data analysis 32 3.4.2 Preparing data for analysis 32 3.5 TRUSTWORTHINESS OF THE RESEARCH 33 3.5.1 Multiple methods of data collection 33 3.5.2 Building an audit trail 33 3.5.3 Working with a research team 34 3.5.4 Member checks 34 3.6 RELIABILITY 34 3.7 VALIDITY 34 3.8 CONCLUSION 35
CHAPTER FOUR: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF EMPIRICAL DATA 4.1 INTRODUCTION 36 4.2 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS 36 4.3 WHAT ARE THE CAUSES OF FINANCIAL EXCLUSION 37 AT YOUR INSTITUTION? 4.3.1 Socio-economic factors 37 4.3.2 Political factors 38 4.3.3 Ineffective financial management 39 4.3.4 Ineffective communication . 40 4.4 WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF FINANCIAL 41 EXCLUSION AT YOUR INSTITUTION?
xi 4.5 WHAT IS THE SOLUTION TO FINANCIAL EXCLUSION? 42 4.6 INTERPRETATION OF THE EMPIRICAL DATA 43 4.6.1 Causes of financial exclusion at your institution 43 4.6.1.1 Socio-economic factors 43 4.6.2 Political factors 44 4.6.3 Ineffective financial management 45 4.6.4 Ineffective communication 45 4.7 CONSEQUENCES OF FINANCIAL EXCLUSION 46 4.8 SOLUTION TO FINANCIAL EXCLUSION 46 4.9 CONCLUSION 47
CHAPTER FIVE: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 INTRODUCTION 48 5.2 FINDINGS 48 5.2.1 What are the regulations pertaining to the payment of fees at institutions of higher learning 48 5.2.2 What are the causes of financial exclusion at institutions of higher learning? 49 5.2.2.1 Students 49 5.2.2.2 Parents 51 5.2.2.3 Institutions of higher learning 52 5.3 WHAT STRATEGIES DO HAIs EMPLOY IN ORDER TO MANAGE FINANCIAL EXCLUSION? 53 5.4 WHO IS AFFECTED BY FINANCIAL EXCLUSION? 53 5.5 RECOMMENDATIONS 54 5.6 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 57 5.7 FURTHER RESEARCH 57 5.8 CONCLUSION 57 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY 58
xii LIST OF TABLES
2.1 GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL AND FUNDING MECHANISMS 18 4.3.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS 37 4.3.2 POLITICAL FACTORS 38 4.3.3 INEFFECTIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 39 4.3.4 INEFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION 40 4.4 WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF FINANCIAL EXCLUSION AT YOUR INSTITUTION? 41 4.5 WHAT IS THE SOLUTION TO FINANCIAL EXCLUSION? 42
LIST OF ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A
FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEWS BETWEEN MS MABUZA AND THE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OF THE RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY (RAU) 1
FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEWS BETWEEN MS MABUZA AND THE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE NORTH AT QWAQWA (UNIQWA) 13
FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW BETWEEN MS MABUZA AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANTS OF THE RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY(RAU) 29 FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEWS BETWEEN MS MABUZA AND THE FINANCIAL AID OFFICERS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE NORTH AT QWAQWA (UNIQWA) 36
ANNEXURE B
INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEW BETWEEN MS MABUZA AND THE ACADEMIC STAFF OF THE RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY 1
INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS BETWEEN MS MABUZA AND THE HEAD OF A SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE NORTH AT QWAQWA (UNIQWA) 10
INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEWS BETWEEN MS MABUZA AND THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR: FINANCE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE NORTH AT QWAQWA (UNIQWA) 17
xiv CHAPTER ONE
ORIENTATION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
In the past, South Africa used education as a tool for discrimination. This practice was also visible in higher learning institutions. The establishment and existence of some institutions of higher learning was therefore politically inclined (Robbins, 1999a: 26). Many of these institutions catered for black students from disadvantaged communities and poor family backgrounds. Such universities were called bush universities and others historically black universities.
Students in these institutions could not raise registration fees, let alone study fees for the whole academic programme. Management of these institutions made the mistake to register students without the stipulated registration fee. This left the institutions with exhorbitant student debts.
Attempts to change the tradition of non-payment in these institutions, resulted in many students loosing their lives, increased attrition rates and retarded academic progress as a result of class disruptions caused by the students. It also caused other societal problems, for example, a decrease in delivering employable students, thus an increase in the unemployment rate. In one case, a student died when a mob of students were demonstrating and vandalising the university premises after 512 students were de-registered by the University of Durban- Westville. The university was closed indefinitely on the 17 th May 2000. The mid- year examinations had to be postponed due to student unrest caused by financial exclusion (Asmara, 2000:1; Modise, 2000). In another case, students were arrested following a protest at the University of the Western Cape. They were arrested because of a sit-in as a result of expulsion by university management because they could not pay their fees (BBC News, 3 February 1998).
1 South Africa's transition to democracy requires all existing practices in the institutions of higher learning to be reviewed and revisited to fit in with new policies. According to the South African Higher Education Act, no 101 of 1997 (Republic of South Africa, 1997:1ff), the government will transform, restructure and redress the past discrimination as well as respond to the needs of the public and communities served by the institutions. This can be done by providing equal access, democratisation, globalisation and by funding the institutions (Republic of South Africa Draft White Paper 3,1997:10), However, this is not done to the expectations of -the Historically Disadvantaged Institutions (HDIs), who were expecting their debts to be cancelled (Modise, 17 May 2000).
With regard to equal access, especially prospective students from poor backgrounds find it impossible to gain access to liberal and Afrikaner universities, as they are unable to secure registration fees for such universities. They are discriminated against on the basis of finance. The government's National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) only assists students who are already registered at an institution (Asmal, 14 March 2000).
1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT
According to my personal experience as a university student, the HDIs are characterised by class disruptions that lead to retarded academic progress during most academic years, the main reason being financial exclusion faced by students in these institutions (cf. Morris, 1998:1; Workers' Solidarity, 1999:1; Amupadhi, 1996:2; Amupadhi and Hess, 1996:1ff).
HDIs have failed to attract potential professional experts because of a lack of basic facilities such as libraries. This resulted in such experts resorting to Historically Advantaged Institutions (HAIs) in pursuit of their careers. The quality of students HDIs were producing, was thus questioned (Robbins, 1999b: 26).
2 According to Jones (1998:20), many employers and recruitment agencies commented negatively on the quality of degrees offered by HDIs such as the University of the North, Vista University and Fort Hare University. They also indicated that students from these institutions needed a further year of study to enrol for a second degree in order to write the Chartered Accountants Board examination.
The government has allocated a total of R50,71 billion to education for the financial year 2000/01, up from R47.8 billion in 1999. Out of this amount, only R6,2 billion was allocated to higher education institutions compared to the previous year's R7 billion. This government subsidy to the HDIs is a drop in the ocean. Professor Cecil Abrahams from the South African Vice-Chancellor's Association indicated that the cutbacks in the budget would make it extremely difficult for the institutions that are already struggling with deficits and huge student loans (Naidu, 2000:12). The already poor institutions will thus become even poorer (Workers' Solidarity, 1999:1).
The formula the government intends to implement in 2002, is not known because the government wants to get it right before being implemented. The current formula, known as South African Post-Secondary Education (SAPSE) where student populations, pass rates, number of postgraduate students and fields of study will determine the subsidy of institutions, is problematic (Robbins, 1999b: 27). The HDIs are faced with low student intakes every year (University of the North in Qwaqwa - UNIQWA, 2000: 9). HDIs pass rates are low, as is the number of postgraduates. In addition, large numbers of students have registered for humanities rather than natural sciences.
According to Professor Kader Asmal, students' debt in 21 universities and 15 technikons is almost R700 million (Naidu, 2000:12). The University of the North with R96 million owes the highest debt. This university as well as the University of Transkei is facing closure, due to the students' debt (Robbins, 1999a: 26).
3 The consequences will be that even more students will drop out, causing, among others: an escalating unemployment rate in the country; an escalating crime rate in the country; minimum production of professionals; demotivation of prospective students to pursue their careers; and prolonged duration of study.
The NSFAS, also called the Tertiary Education Fund of South Africa (TEFSA), is the only source of income at the HDIs. The National Department of Education funds this loan and bursary scheme. The amount allocated to every institution is determined by the following factors: number of Disadvantaged Students Index (DSO; and Full Cost of Study (FCS).
If the financial problems remain unsolved, many students will be left with no option but to leave institutions of higher learning because the fees are increased every year (Anon, 1991:4; Anon, 1995:6). Against this background, it appears as if the dilemma of this research can be condensed by means of the following research questions: What are the regulations pertaining to the payment of student fees at the institutions of higher learning? What are the causes of financial exclusions at HDIs? Which strategies do HAls employ to manage financial exclusions?
4 1.3 AIM OF RESEARCH
The general aim of the research is to investigate financial exclusion in a HDI. In order to achieve this aim, this mini-dissertation aims to:
Investigate the causes of financial exclusion in a HDI; and to determine what strategies can be adopted from HAls in terms of: financial management; budget: distribution and allocation to academically and financially needy students; sources of income other than the NSFAS; and strategies to address the issue of financially needy students and academically deserving students.
The focus of this research will be on the causes of financial exclusion in a HDI; the problems emanating from such causes and proposed strategies to be adopted from the HAls. The class disruptions caused by factors other than financial exclusion and the overall budget of the institutions will not be accounted for in this research. Only the budget relating to financial aid to needy and academically deserving students will be researched.
1.4 METHOD OF RESEARCH
A qualitative research method will be used for this research. This method allows participants to air their views without being controlled. According to (Creswell (1998:15) Mauch and Birch (1998:18) and Bryman and Burgess (1999:140), qualitative research deals mainly with statements and questions said in words, with detailed descriptions of the settings and events.
5 A case study, namely a specific HDI, will be used in this research. This will be helpful as a background to the development of current conditions and environmental interactions of one or more individuals. Groups in the institution will be observed, and their responses will be recorded and analysed (Mauch & Birch, 1998:117).
1.4.1 Document analysis
For the purpose of this research, relevant literature will be researched. This will include South African legislation, policy, acts, the constitution, the National Commission on Higher Education, regulations pertaining to student fee payments, journals, books and other relevant material to assist in this research. To keep abreast with current publications on the problem statement, newspaper articles will also be studied.
1.4.2 Data collection
Only two focus group interviews and four individual interviews will be considered. This method will be used because the selected participants share certain characteristics relevant to the research question. It will also help the researcher to gather a large amount of data quickly (Marshall and Rossman, 1995:84).
1.4.3 Data analysis
Data analysis will result from fieldwork where the whole setting and context relevant to the research will be observed and respondents interviewed (Bryman and Burgess, 1999:140; De Vos, 1998: 48). Collected data will be analysed immediately after data collection. Ideas will be based on their commonness. Big ideas will be grouped together, while also considering small ideas (Bryman and Burgess, 1999:140). Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with the aid of an audiotape. The outcomes will be transcribed. Interviews will be used, as they
6 will be conducted face to face with the relevant stakeholders mentioned hereunder. The researcher will be able to answer questions and direct the process where necessary (Chauke, 1998:11; Mauch and Birch, 1998:18; Silverman, 2000:45).
1.4.4 Population
The following are the respondents to be used in this research. They are selected because they share certain characteristics relevant to the research question.
Students
Only undergraduate, registered students will be relevant for this research. They are selected because they struggle financially with their first degrees. Three students from a specific HDI and three students from a selected HAI will be interviewed.
Administrative staff
Only financial aid officers or financial assistants will be considered for this research. They are directly involved with the students as far as bursaries and loans are concerned. Three officers from a specific HDI and three officers from a selected HAI will be interviewed.
Academic staff
Only one Head of Department (HOD) from a specific HDI and one HOD from a selected HAI will be considered, to determine if they provide financial aid to academically deserving and financially needy students in their respective faculties/schools.
7 Management
Only the Registrar: Finance from a specific HDI and one from a selected HAI, will be selected because they are well informed about the overall budget of their institutions' budgets.
1.5 DEMARCATION OF THE INVESTIGATION
In order to collect data, the research will focus mainly on two institutions, namely, the University of the North at Qwaqwa in the Free State Province and the Rand Afrikaans University in the Gauteng Province.
1.5.1 University of the North at Qwaqwa (UNIQWA)
This university is selected mainly for the following reasons: It is the Satellite University of the University of the North. It is a HDI, established in 1982 to cater mainly for black students from poor backgrounds. It continues to attract such students. It is located in the then homeland of Qwaqwa-Phuthaditjhaba.
1.5.2 Rand Afrikaans University (RAU)
This university is selected mainly for the following reasons: It is a HAI. It was established in 1967 to cater mainly for Afrikaans speaking students. Since recently it has attracted diversified students from diverse population groups.
8 1.6 CLARIFICATION OF CONCEPTS
1.6.1 Financial exclusion
According to Allen (1990:407), exclusion means to keep out from a place, groups or privilege. In this research, financial exclusion will imply that students are not allowed to continue with their academic programme due to financial constraints.
1.6.2 Financial aid
This is money in the form of grants, loans, or bursaries allocated by various donors or sponsors to academically deserving and financially needy students to assist them to meet their academic and financial obligations (Anon, 1999:1).
1.7 PLAN OF STUDY
In chapter 1, an overview of the background of the HDIs is provided. The problem statement also highlights the shortcomings of the HD's initiated by the Apartheid regime to frustrate the South African population. This research aims at identifying the causes of financial exclusion. By comparing one HAI with one HDI, it is hoped that the solution to the problem will be unveiled by using the institutions' respective strategies. Data will be collected at two universities, namely, the University of the North at Qwaqwa in the Free State and Rand Afrikaans University in the Gauteng province. Qualitative research methodology will be used, while structured interviews and observation will be utilised as data collection instruments. Concepts to be used throughout the research will be clarified.
9 The remainder of the research will focus on the following.
Chapter 2: Literature review
In this chapter, reference will be made to literature to establish what other countries fund tertiary education.
Chapter 3: Empirical design
In this chapter, the research instrument and empirical investigation will be dealt with. Respondents, biographical details, the research group and the questionnaires will be prepared for investigation.
Chapter 4: Analysis and interpretation of empirical data
In this chapter, empirical data will be analysed and interpreted.
Chapter 5: Findings and recommendations
In this chapter, findings and recommendations will be made, based on the empirical data collected.
1.8 CONCLUSION
Bearing the above in mind, chapter two will focus on the literature review that will inform and direct the research with regard to the causes of financial exclusion in a HDI. This will determine what strategies should be adopted from a HAI to alleviate the problem.
10 CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Financial crises in higher education were and still continue to be a problem at South African institutions of higher learning. This is evident in escalating students' unrest in various higher education institutions. It led to a number of bitter incidences that took place at various institutions, such as the incident at the University of Durban-Westville where a student died when the police attempted to restore order. The Sowetan (2000:17) indicated that students demonstrate almost every week.
Chapter two will define financial exclusion at higher education institutions. The overall background of concerns voiced by different organisations prior to the 1994 era around financial crises at higher education institutions will be dealt with. The funding of higher education institutions regarding both the subsidies allocated by the government to different institutions as well as financial assistance to students will be discussed. Reference will also be made to other countries to establish how they address the problem of students' financial exclusions.
2.2 OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND
It all started when concerned groups and organisations saw the need for the funding of students at higher education institutions. One of the organisations is the Bursary Council of South Africa (BCSA) under the Chairmanship of Mister Jack Klaas. This organisation felt that there was a need to discuss issues related to government funding in terms of subsidy as well as student funding in terms of bursaries and loans at higher education institutions. Approximately 150
11 representatives from a wide spectrum of interest groups involved in higher education, convened at the University of Cape Town from 24-25 September 1993. The committee comprised organisations from staff members, students, political, non-governmental organisations and donors (BCSA,1993:3).
The resolutions taken and accepted at the conference were the following:
A properly constituted Tertiary Education Fund of South Africa (TEFSA) should be drawn into the network of organisations. The BCSA should be mandated to establish a working group in consultation with interested parties. This group would consult with higher education institutions to gather information about needs, lobby the government for emergency and stabilisation funds and co-ordinate long-term strategy decisions regarding funding. The BCSA should draw on all representative organisations to staff its working groups. Students, funding and higher education institutions should co-operate fully. All representative organisations should cooperate in building a comprehensive database of information relevant to funding higher education. The BCSA would control the representatives to ensure that all interested parties have uniform access (BCSA, 1993:5).
According to BCSA (1993:5), the National Education Co-ordinating Committee proposals were accepted. They were that:
The state would provide emergency funding for students. The Historically Black Institutions (HBI's) should have access to a stabilisation fund. Loans and bursaries should be thoroughly investigated and debated. A loan system should be introduced in phases — with a combined bursary and loan scheme introduced first.
12 ♦ The subsidy formula for institutions should be urgently reviewed so that the bias towards Historically White Institutions (HWIs) will be reduced. ♦ The outcome of this BCSA conference should be fed into the National Education and Training Forum (NETF) (BCSA, 1993:5).
According to Makhura (1995:24) the South African Student Congress (SASCO) held a conference in 1992 to formulate a new policy on access, admission, funding and transformation. They realised that due to the South African economic climate the government could not afford to fully fund higher education. They concluded that the national scheme would solve the problem of students who are excluded from higher education institutions for not paying their fees and that the formula used by the government should be reviewed.
Professor Merlyn Mehl highlighted that there were three burning issues facing the South African higher education system, namely: access, fees and academic development (MacGregor, 1995:21).
Doctor Pundy Pillay who was the then education Ministry advisor, and had been researching student financing options, was of the notion that a loan scheme should be established in order to assist students at higher education institutions (MacGregor, 1995:23). Like the SASCO president Makhura, he indicated that students should also contribute to their study fees. The government could not foot the whole bill (Makhura, 1995:24).
In order to deal with the concerns and recommendations made by the above- mentioned organisations, the government established an advisory committee to investigate the higher education sector crises and to deal with campus disruptions at tertiary institutions. African National Congress (ANC) Deputy General—Secretary, Cheryl Carolus, headed this committee. This committee identified student fees as the cause of most campus disruptions that lead to
13 retarded academic progress. They indicated that there was a need for a National Student Loan and Bursary System (MacGregor, 1995:21).
2.3 FUNDING OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
After the 1994 elections, the government nominated a task group to look into the funding of higher education institutions. They had to investigate the distribution of funds to various institutions. This task group had to report to the National Commission on Higher Education. They first investigated the funding of higher education institutions by the previous government in order to improve such funding.
In the past, the government used a formula that had been in place since 1982. That formula was revised in 1993. It was used by white higher education institutions. HDIs were brought into the formula in 1985. Higher education institutions that were located in the then independent homelands received their funds from their parliament through a budget allocated to their respective parliaments (BCSA, 1993:15).
The formula used is the South African Post—Secondary Education (Sapse) 110 formula. In order to allocate funds to various higher education institutions, the government investigated student enrolment, pass rates, number of postgraduate students, enrolment in the Natural Sciences and research output (BCSA, 1993:16). It is envisaged that the government is considering using this formula by 2002 (Robbins, 1999b: 19-25).
Sapse has proven to have some shortcomings. This is evident in the problems faced by HDIs as compared to HAIs. The HDIs have a low student intake. Many students move to HAIs because of available student support services. Students can also secure jobs because of the HAIs' reputation of high standards (Jones, 1998:20).
14 Many students from disadvantaged communities, who attend HAIs, are from well to do families within those communities. These students can afford registration fees, unlike students at HDIs who cannot raise registration fees, let alone study fees for a full academic programme. HDIs have a low pass rate. This is because many students are from communities where resources conducive to learning are scarce, for example, libraries. Many students are registered for the Humanities and not for Natural Sciences while the number of postgraduates are low. This is because students have to seek employment in order to help their families and to educate other siblings.
In order to redress the disadvantages of the past, the National Commission on Higher Education with the mandate from the Minister of Education, started to investigate the basic principles that would serve as guidelines in the funding of higher education institutions (Republic of South Africa National Commission on Higher Education, 1996:1ff). They mention four key funding principles, namely:
principle of shared costs;
principle of equity and redress;
principle of development; and
principle of efficiency, sustainability and quality.
2.3.1 Principle of shared costs
According to the National Commission on Higher Education (Republic of South Africa, 1996:1ff), the costs of higher education should be a shared responsibility between the government, students and the public sector. This implies that the government should fund Higher Education by means of subsidies. The students should contribute towards their studies. It is argued that students should not pay
15 anything, but at the SASCO conference that took place in 1992, was proposed that students should contribute towards their studies (Makhura, 1995:24). The public sector could contribute to higher education by means of bursaries.
2.3.2 Principle of equity and redress
State funding of all institutions should be equal. Students from all walks of life should gain access to all higher education institutions. The institutions that used to benefit from the past should be subsidised accordingly.
2.3.3 Principle of development
Higher education should produce the human resources required by the country. Higher education institutions should be funded according to the relevant programmes, projects and research. The most needed human resources needed in any country are scientists and technologists. This is believed to have an impact at boosting the economy of the country. Higher education institutions should attempt to limit the number of students registering for Humanities. According to the current "size and shape" deliberations, certain percentages are allocated to Humanities (Social Sciences), Sciences and Economics. This will determine the standard (position) of institutions (among others).
2.3.4 Principle of efficiency, sustainability and quality
Funding should ensure that the higher education system operates efficiently. It should be an affordable system. After completing their studies, students should achieve the goals set for the fund. On the basis of the above principles, the government would be able to finance higher education institutions. In order to do this, the government investigated various funding practices to select the most appropriate funding practice.
16 2.4 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING PRACTICES
2.4.1 Formula funding
This is a mechanical formula, which includes the following:
Input variable: full time equivalent student enrollments.
Output variable: student success rates and research publications.
According to this funding practice, the government subsidises institutions by taking into account the number of admitted students and the pass rate. Therefore, all institutions of higher learning are expected to submit a report stating the number of admitted students and statistics of graduates. This practice is currently used in the South African higher education system (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995: 120).
2.4.2 Budgetary funding
Tertiary institutions submit their budgets to the government (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995:121).
2.4.3 Full funding of all activities
Government departments accept responsibility for all the costs of some higher education institutions. No institutional budgets are submitted. Independent institutional accounts are prepared instead. This practice is used in the Senegalese higher education system (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995: 121).
Table 2.1 refers to government control and funding mechanisms in higher education institutions in other countries.
17 2.5 GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL AND FUNDING MECHANISMS IN OTHER COUNTRIES
Table 2.1 Governmental control and funding mechanisms
COUNTRY: ADMISSIONS FINANCE: INTERNAL ALLOCATIONS (and type of funding governmental control institutional governmental control mechanism) over institutional dependence on over internal budgeting enrollments government for finance
Negotiation based Morocco high high high Algeria high high high Argentina high high medium Honduras high high medium Kenya medium high high Sudan medium high high Brazil medium high medium India medium medium high The Philippines medium medium medium
Input based France high high medium Sweden medium high high Nigeria medium high medium Norway medium high medium China medium high medium Indonesia medium medium medium Japan medium low medium
18 Vietnam medium low medium Ontario, Canada low medium low UK low medium low South Africa medium low low Japan (private) low low low
Performance based Finland medium high medium The Netherlands high high low Denmark medium high medium Israel medium low medium
Student based Chile medium low low (Ziderman & Albrecht, 1995:111)
When studying Table 2.1, it becomes clear that South Africa uses the input based funding mechanism under the formula funding practice. In order to ascertain the problems faced by South African higher education institutions, it should be determined what other countries are doing to curb the problem of financial exclusion. The focus will be on three countries, namely: Senegal, the Philippines and the United States of America (USA).
2.6 STATE FUNDING IN OTHER COUNTRIES
2.6.1 Senegal
In Senegal, the university system is funded entirely by the central government. There are no tuition fees or loan programmes. Extra-ordinary student support is provided in the form of the scholarship scheme administered by the minister of
19 higher education. Student support services are handled by the 'Centre des Oeuvres Universitaires de Dakar' (COUD). All students at Senegalese Universities are eligible for this scholarship. It covers highly subsidised meals, lodging, medical services and transportation. Students only contribute 16% of the above-mentioned social costs (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995:15-16).
2.6.2 The Philippines
In the Philippines, higher education is divided into two sectors, firstly, public higher education and secondly, private higher education. Public higher education receives massive support from the state but students still spend large amounts of money on tuition fees. Loans are available from the state but only 1% of students avail themselves for that type of loan. Over 80% of students attend private colleges and universities. The state does not subsidise private institutions (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995:16). This means that students and their families in the Philippines afford educational expenses without any aid from the state. This can be seen in the percentage of students who need financial assistance from the state.
2.6.3 The United States of America (USA)
The students' financial assistance programmes changed dramatically in the USA higher education system. The first recorded scholarship programme started in 1959 when lady Anne Moulson allocated 100 English pounds to support poor students attending colleges and universities (Van Dusen and Hearne, 1968:1). The education system of USA is currently characterised by revenue diversification. The public university sector receives less than half of its revenue from the government. Cost recovery is also present in the public university sector (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995:16).
20 2.7 TYPES OF STUDENT LOAN PROGRAMMES
Student loan schemes have been developed in more than 50 countries worldwide. Every country uses its own loan programme system depending on the economy of that specific country. There are three types of student loan programmes.
2.7.1 Mortgage type loan
In this type of loan, repayment is made over a specified period. A fixed period payment is usually needed. Interest and maximum length of repayment is used to calculate the fixed payment (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995: 62).
2.7.2 Graduated nominal payment
This type is mostly used in Chile. Students are expected to repay equal real amounts (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995:62).
2.7.3 Income contingent loan
Countries such as Australia, Ghana and Sweden use this type of loan. Loans are repaid after the student graduates and has secured employment. In this case, loan repayment is determined by the annual income the student earns (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995:62).
In South Africa, the income contingent loan is used in as far as loan recovery is concerned. This was proposed and recommended by the then advisor to the Minister of Education, Doctor Pundy PiIlay, who indicated that this model would be useful because high earners repay their loans more rapidly, and benefit less from the subsidy. The reverse is true of low earners (MacGregor, 1995:23).
21 There are different organisations that fund the higher education sector. HAIs benefit from many organisations, both locally and from outside the country, namely, the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR), the Study Trust, and postgraduates, from the National Research Foundation. This is because of their standing reputation and image. For the purpose of this discussion, the focus will be on one funding model that could benefit all institutions of higher education.
2.8 THE MODEL OF FUNDING IN SOUTH AFRICA
In South Africa, the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) also known as Tertiary Education of South Africa (TEFSA) is the only major source of income at HDIs. TEFSA serves as a buffer between the government and higher education institutions. This system is also used in other countries such as Britain (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995:115).
A buffer body is an organisation that stands between the government and the institutions to manage funding allocation decisions. It consists of University officials and technical expects. The main function of a buffer is to evaluate the needs of every respective institution in terms of funding (Ziderman and Albrecht, 1995:115).
The NSFAS was established in 1991, after extensive research indicated that there was a need for the scheme to alleviate the plight of financial exclusions at higher education institutions. The scheme contains Loan and Bursary components. The National Department of Education primarily funds it (NSFAS/TEFSA 2000b: 1).
The then Minister of Education, Professor Sibusiso Bengu, launched the NSFAS. An amount of R300 million was contributed to start the scheme. Professor Itumeleng Mosala indicated that the contribution was not sufficient for the number
22 of needy students at institutions of higher learning. He indicated that R2 billion was the appropriate amount to cater for poor students. An eminent group was established in order to raise additional funds for the scheme (Bell, 1996:20).
2.9 WHO QUALIFIES FOR NATIONAL STUDENT FINANCIAL AID SCHEME LOANS?
Students are expected to meet certain requirements in order to qualify for a loan as stipulated in the 2000 NSFAS booklet (NSFAS/TEFSA 2000b: 1). Students should be:
South African citizens; registered at a South African university or technikon; an undergraduate, studying for a first degree; or studying for a second higher education qualification, if necessary to practice in the chosen profession, for example, a LLB or HED; able to demonstrate potential for academic success; and financially needy.
2.10 CRITERIA FOR ALLOCATIONS BY NSFAS TO TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS
The amount received by TEFSA is distributed among institutions in terms of the number of disadvantaged students and full cost of study at each institution. The following formula is used in order to allocate funds (NSFAS/TEFSA 2000a: 1):
23 The Disadvantaged Students Index (DSI)
An index of the number of disadvantaged students (DSI) is determined by the following formula:
DSI = (no of African students x30)+(no of Coloured students x 20)+(no of Indian students x 10)
The Average Full Cost of Study (FCS)
The average full cost of study (FCS) is obtained from each institution. This figure reflects the average annual fee for residential accommodation, including meals, plus the annual tuition fee averaged over all courses of study.
FCS = TUITION FEE + RESIDENCE FEE
The Disadvantaged Students Cost Index (DSCI)
The product of the DSI and the FCS is the Disadvantaged Student's Cost Index.
The Apportionment Factor (AF)
The apportionment factor (AF), expressed as a percentage for each institution, is calculated as follows:
AF% = DSCI / SUM OF ALL DSCI's X 100
The allocation in Rands for each institution is the AF% of the total sum available for that institution.
24 2.11 SUMMARY
Much effort was made in order to alleviate the problem of financial exclusion at higher education institutions. Due to students' unrest that continues to occur at higher education institutions, especially at the HD's, it seems that the NSFAS is not solving the problem.
Financial assistance/aid would help more prospective students to be educated and to acquire lifetime enhancement of cultural and other experiences. More knowledge would be acquired to be utilised effectively in a democratic society. There should be more active participation of citizens, greater social effectiveness in terms of better understanding, mutual tolerance among individuals and groups, more effective preservation and extention of the cultural heritage, and greater ability of individuals and groups to accept and adjust to rapid change. More parents would be educated and would secure better jobs to assist their children with higher education fees (Mayhew, 1973:2).
The Chief Executive Officer of South African Vice Chancellors' Association (SAUVCA) send a circular to all higher education institutions requesting a record of the policies and practices of fee collection by institutional management (Kotecha, 2000:1). This follows a request by the Minister of Education, Professor Kader Asmal, in order to solve the problems of funding at higher education institutions.
2.12 CONCLUSION
Bearing the above in mind, chapter three will focus on the empirical design of this research. Qualitative research methodology will be used as stipulated in chapter two. The focus will be on a literature review, field notes, individual and group interviews. The process of data analysis and preparation of the data for analysis
25 will be dealt with. Trustworthiness of the research will be proven by reliability and validity processes.
26 CHAPTER THREE
EMPIRICAL DESIGN
3.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter, the focus was on the literature study, where the empirical research was formulated.
Chapter three will thus focus on the empirical research and will elaborate on the empirical design. Qualitative research methodology will be used as stipulated in chapter one. I will also focus on the literature review; field notes, individual and focus group interviews. The process of data analysis and preparing the data for analysis, will also be dealt with. Reliability and validity will prove trustworthiness of the research processes.
3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN
According to Vockel (1983:356), research design is the systematic scheduling of times at which treatments are to be administered to subjects and when observations are made of the performance of the subjects. The research design is developed from the research problem (Mouton and Marais, 1990:107). The research problem guides the researcher towards the research design that will best fit the research. The research design serves three major purposes, as stipulated by Marshall and Rossman (1995:38):
It presents a plan to conduct the study. It demonstrates to the reader that the researcher is capable of conducting the study. It should preserve design flexibility, being a hallmark of qualitative research methods.
27 3.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
As stipulated in chapter one, a qualitative research methodology will be used in this research. As this research is about people, this method fits best with social processes (Allan and Skinner, 1991:179). The constant comparative method will be used during data analysis. This is a non-mathematical method that identifies themes and patterns in qualitative data (Maykut and Morehouse, 1994:176). The following reasons are the rationale for choosing this method as indicated by Mauch and Birch (1998:16).
The qualitative research method is empirical and not based on theory. It relies on observation or experimentation. The researcher gathers face-to-face information from the respondents. It follows the principle that experiences form the primary source of scientific knowledge. The respondents form the primary source that enables the researcher to gather first hand information. It encompasses several forms of the investigation. The researcher uses various data collection methods to collect data. This can, among others, include reports of participant observation or texts of in-depth and relatively unstructured interviews. It involves understanding of the phenomena under study through participant observation.
The primary objective is to gain knowledge (data) from the subjects' frame of reference. The qualitative research method requires that the researcher engages with the person and events and that the audience be studied as an integral part of the study process. It seeks to provide full and accurate descriptions of phenomena in all their complexity. The qualitative research method attempts to discover and show the assumptions that underlie events or actions. It uses natural settings as primary data. It deals mainly with statements couched in words and with detailed descriptions of settings and events. Unlike the quantitative research method, the qualitative research method deals with small samples and their uniqueness. I will only interview three students from
28 RAU and UNIQWA respectively. The findings will be based on the information gained from these respondents.
3.3.1 Literature review
In chapter two, I used written material to create a framework for the research. I referred to books, magazines, journals, acts, constitutions and newspaper articles in order to develop the research design.
3.3.2 Field notes
The qualitative research method allows the researcher to collect data in the subjects' own settings. I will use both UNIQWA and RAU settings in order to conduct the research. Field notes will be taken by means of a tape recorder where words, events and settings described by the subjects or respondents will be transcribed into a readable and understandable narrative style (Strauss and Corbin, 1990:22; Maykut and Morehouse, 1994: 122).
3.3.3 Sampling procedure
I will use a judgemental sampling procedure. As this sampling procedure is based on random sampling, it tends to be representative. This sample is selected because I will select the participants or respondents on the basis of who I regard as an average person (Bless, 1995:95). This will be used specifically in the selection of students. Three undergraduate students will be selected from the above-mentioned institutions respectively. They will represent a subgroup of the total student population. This subgroup thus serves as a barometer or a majoring stick of the population. Observation will be restricted to the selected group of students and conclusions drawn from the collected data will be generalised to the total population (Ackoff, 1965: 118-119).
29 3.3.3.1 Selection of participants
In chapter one, I indicated that the participants selected for the purpose of the study share certain characteristics and responsibilities (Mouton, 1996:160). Students were selected because they are registered learners of the stated institutions and are directly affected by financial exclusion. Financial assistants or financial aid officers were selected because they are permanent staff members employed by the stated institutions and are directly involved with the students in terms of bursaries and loans. Under management, the researcher selected the Registrars: Finance. They were selected because they are permanent staff members employed by the stated institutions and are knowledgeable of financial management. They have the skills and expertise of drawing up and interpreting the overall budget of their respective institutions. Under academic staff, the heads of schools were selected because they are permanently employed by the stated institutions and conduct the lectures. They are able to identify students who are academically deserving and who need financial assistance in order to complete their studies. They are knowledgeable of the criteria used by their respective faculties to identify and assist students who are academically deserving and financially needy.
3.3.3.2 Focus group interview guide
The interview guide is a brief series of questions used by the researcher to guide the group's conversation (Maykut and Morehouse, 1994:107). The focus group interview can be found in annexure A. Three basic questions will be asked during the interviews. Follow up questions will emanate from the respondents' answers. The three questions are as follows:
What do you think are the causes of financial exclusion at your institution? What are the consequences of financial exclusion at your institution?
30 3. What do you think are the solutions to financial exclusion at your institution?
We brainstormed on the causes and consequences of financial exclusion. The brainstorming process emanated from the literature review in chapter two. We came up with the following during the brainstorming session:
We grouped the ideas according to categories based on their commonness.
1. SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS
Poverty. Culture of non-payment. Poor financial planning.
2. INEFFECTIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Reserves for deserving students. Bad allocation of monies. Poor financial planning. Poor management of fees.
3. COMMUNICATION
Ignorance. Lack of communication between staff and students. Dissemination of information.
31
3.3.4 Individual interviews
3.3.4.1 Selection of participants
I will use individual interviews with the Registrars and Academics. This will be applicable to both RAU and UNIQWA respectively.
3.3.4.2 Individual interview guide
The Registrars: Finance are selected because of their experience in financial matters of their respective institutions. The academics are selected because they are able to identify students who are academically deserving and to provide assistance to the financially needy in their respective faculties. The individual interview guide can be found in annexure B.
3.4 DATA ANALYSIS
3.4.1 The process of data analysis
This research will focus on the inductive data analysis approach, allowed by the qualitative research method. The hypothesis is not predetermined. It emanates from the collected data.
3.4.2 Preparing data for analysis
The constant comparative method will be used during data analysis. All collected data will be transcribed and photocopies will be made. Data will be coded according to commonness. It will then be unitised, to categorize the meaning and actions of the participants. The categories will then be refined.
32 The relationships and patterns across categories will be explored. Integration of data yielding an understanding of people and settings will be studied. Thereafter recommendations will be made, and the data will be analysed and interpreted (Maykut and Morehouse, 1994:134,Silverman, 2000:179).
3.5 TRUSTWORTHINESS OF THE RESEARCH
Trustworthiness refers to confidence in the reported outcomes or research findings (Maykut and Morehouse, 1994:145). The following aspects will increase trustworthiness in the researcher's findings.
3.5.1 Multiple methods of data collection
In this research, I will use multiple methods of data collection in order to build strong research credibility. I will use semi-structured interviews coupled with observations and document analysis. This multiple method of data collection is called triangulation (Bell, 1993:64). Triangulation is an attempt to get a 'true' fix on a situation by combining different ways of looking at it or different findings (Silverman, 2000:177).
3.5.2 Building an audit trail
I will relate the data collection methods and data analysis to guide the reader through the research. The constant comparative method will also be used in order to ensure trustworthiness of the research. This will be done by referring to the raw data, interview transcripts and field notes gathered by the researcher during the interviews.
33 3.5.3 Working with a research team
To ensure trustworthiness of the research findings, I will keep record of the audit trail.
3.5.4 Member checks
I will ensure that the information to be published had been double-checked with the respondents to ascertain if what is written is the true reflection of what was uttered. This is also called respondent validation (Silverman, 2000:177).
3.6 RELIABILITY
Reliability is the degree of consistency. It is when the instances are assigned to the same category by different observers or by the same observer on different occasions (Silverman, 2000:175). The responses the researcher will receive from the respondents should be the same whenever or wherever the research is conducted (Silverman, 1997:117). Reliability is influenced by four variables, namely: the researcher, the participants or respondents, the measuring instrument and the research context or the circumstances under which the research is conducted (Mouton and Marais, 1990:79; Bell, 1993:64).
3.7 VALIDITY
This is the extent to which an account accurately represents the social phenomena to which it refers. It refers to the explanation given by the respondents whether true or false in terms of what is happening in real life situations. It should measure what it is supposed to measure. This will be supported by the data that the researcher has collected (Hammersley, 1990:57; Bell, 1993:64).
34 Both internal and external validity will be dealt with. I will ensure that the collected data will be correctly interpreted and understood. The research findings will also be generalised to improve the situation at institutions of higher learning as far as financial exclusion is concerned.
3.8 CONCLUSION
Bearing the above in mind, chapter four will focus on the interpretation of the data and the data analysis, on which the recommendations will be based. The data will be analysed by using the constant comparative method. Ideas will be based on their commonness. Big ideas will be grouped together while small ideas will also be considered.
35 CHAPTER FOUR
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF EMPIRICAL DATA
4.1 INTRODUCTION
In chapter three, the data collection procedure was discussed. Qualitative methodology was used because it is based on a naturalistic phenomenal philosophy. This approach assumes that multiple realities are socially constructed through individual and collective definitions of the situations (McMillan and Schumacher, 1993:14).
4.2 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
Qualitative analysis is a systematic process of selecting, categorising, comparing, synthesising and interpreting data to provide explanations for the single phenomenon of interest (McMillan and Schumacher, 1993:48). To provide an explanation of the causes and consequences of financial exclusion, interviews were held at two different institutions. Both group and individual interviews were conducted. I interviewed the students, administrative staff members, academics and senior management.
During the interview process, interviewees indicated areas of concern, as indicated in chapter two. The outcomes were grouped into the following categories: socio-economic factors, political factors, ineffective financial management and communication.
In this chapter, these categories will be used for a synthesis and interpretation of data.
36
4.3 WHAT ARE THE CAUSES OF FINANCIAL EXCLUSION AT YOUR INSTITUTION?
Socio-economic factors
• ACADEMICS ADMINISTRATORS • MANAGEMENT STUDENTS 1 . 1 , i H 1. , •!, a co 4= CL ...) G .c J - O Cl) "1:3 _1 In. 7:' .__ 8 C Er 0 as O a) CD Cl) C C = cp c cc a)cj E z' ca. co C W c co co 0 C C 0 crs co C 0. 0 > O C o. CDO .._ O — " ....._ . .. ) ) 2 -o-Ncv CO ,..-- - v ,.- ?...... C — 'E' ch a) co E E 0 a) a. 0 C 0. o CO E CV c .o o 0. -J = Co C ui ,- a) = u) v c . a) " E , - '0 = lc v ..- 1- .o -0 .)e CO C 0 _Ne .7 in a) CO o Co a U) QE c o E co ui C a) a c-) 2cocacEc...... Co o v) = CO 0 c ° o c c 0) I- CI) 0 - .....- 0) co O o ( 0 c = cti a) as - = >-. = o >, is ) ) ) = -c :C -0 .0 -0 . Cl) 46 .o .c 0 ..0 -0 = ....- 4_, ..... 8 S' c 0 0 o o cr) cn C a) CL ° 0 ca o 2 0 c 0 E g a) C7) Cl) 0 as o. ..E o C 6 V = a) = c§ 0 " c 26 = C ,._ E cl; o. > 7 2 )