The Linguistic Situation in Orkesumet, an Urban Area in Simanjiro District of Tanzania Amani Lusekelo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Linguistic Situation in Orkesumet, an Urban Area in Simanjiro District of Tanzania Amani Lusekelo The Linguistic Situation in Orkesumet, an Urban Area in Simanjiro District of Tanzania Amani Lusekelo http://dx.doi./org/10.4314/ujah.v20i1.2 Abstract An investigation of the linguistic landscape in urban Africa is a welcome contribution to make in that multilingualism presents fascinating results. To satisfy this demand, the current paper investigates the patterns of language use in billboards in a small township of Orkesumet in northern Tanzania. Data demonstrates that the state of Kiswahili and English bilingualism is apparently open for religiously, privately and publicly owned institutions such as schools, churches, public offices, and accommodation facilities. Such bilingual billboards do not make use of hybrid language because there were no tokens of Kiswahili-English, Maasai-English and Kiswahili-Maasai recorded in the area. The main mechanism used to attract customers is through the selection of font- colour and font-size. The large font in black colour is preferred for names of firms, while red colour is opted for items sold and/or services rendered. Keywords: Bilingualism, Billboards, Language Use, Simanjiro, Tanzania Introduction The linguistic situation in Tanzania is arguably claimed to comprise Kiswahili as the main national language used as a lingua franca and official language across the country (Batibo 2000; Petzell 2012). With regard to wider communications in formal settings, English turns the second in command because it manifests in most formal institutions such as schools, high courts, international forum and diplomatic relations (Abdulaziz 1972; Roy-Campbell & Qorro 1997; Rubagumya 2003; Keya 2016). The ethnic community languages remain confined to informal 30 UJAH Volume 20 No.1, 2019 settings in most cases around the homesteads (Batibo 1992; Msanjila 2003; Muzale & Rugemalira 2008). This paper wants to expose the linguistic situation in urban Tanzania by examining the language use in the billboards found around Orkesumet District Headquarters of Simanjiro in Manyara Region, northern Tanzania. The Study of linguistic landscape in African cities is growing though much output come from South Africa. For instance, Dowling (2010, 2012), Kotze and du Plessis (2010) and Stround and Mpendukana (2009) examines the linguistic situation in white settlements as opposed to the black suburbs of South Africa. The outcome shows that each area is dominated by a single language. In suburbs, Isixhosa or Isizulu dominates while in white settlements, Afrikaans and English are commonly used. In addition, in South Africa, the billboards obtained in suburbs tend to contain bottom-up language which represents the class of the minority languages, as discussed by Kotze and du Plessis (2010) and Dowling (2010, 2012). In this decade, research on linguistic landscape had been growing in Tanzania. It begins with Bwenge (2009) who presents the Kiswahili and English use in billboards. Peterson (2014) and Chul-joon (2014) examined signboards in Dar es Salaam. Both Bwenge and Chul- joon focus on billboards while Peterson pays much attention to signboards for privately owned firms. Recently, Mdukula (2018) examined linguistic landscape of Muhimbili National Referral Hospital, while and Legère and Rosendal (2019) report on the linguistic landscape being informed by language policy in Africa. The findings from studies on linguistic landscape demonstrate contradicting results. For instance, while Bwenge (2009, 2012) found a two-strand of English and Kiswahili bilingualism in billboards in Dar es Salaam, Peterson (2014) reports of the evidence of multilingualism in shop-signs, with the use of many languages, namely Kiswahili, English, Arabic, Hindi and numerous ethnic community languages. Another difference is reported on the predominance of Kiswahili by Bwenge (2009, 2012) and English by Peterson (2014). Such kinds of different outcomes of researches conducted in the same township call for research 31 Lusekelo: The Linguistic Situation in Orkesumet on other areas in the country as well; hence this research was envisaged to fill the gap. The studies mentioned above obtained data from the metropole Dar es Salaam. The outcomes of their research does not provide a full picture of the linguistic profile of the country. Lusekelo and Alphonce (2018) examined the language of public space in district capitals in Tanzania. Findings from Arusha and Manyara Regions exhibit the dominance of English. This indicates that Tanzanians affiliate with the language of power in Tanzania, namely the language of ex-colonial master. Another motivation for the current research emanates from the fascinating findings in urban centres in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Kigali Rwanda, Rosendal (2010) found the adherence to the modern language regulations in main-streets, having predominantly English and French, while the shop-signs in back-streets ignore modern language rules and stick to French and Nyarwanda. In metropolitan cities such as Accra in Ghana and Cape Town in South Africa, it is found that the use of font- type and font-colour underscores the prominence of some information given in certain languages (Stroud & Mpendukana 2009; McLaughlin 2012; Quayson 2010), in most cases hybrid language (Higgins 2009). In order to emulate previous studies, the current contribution examines the font-types and font-colour used in billboards in Orkesumet small- township in northern Tanzania. Linguistic Situation in Orkesumet and the Status of Simanjiro Maasai Previous studies found different patterns of language use in Tanzania. For instance, in rural areas, Msanjila (2004) found the shift to more Kiswahili than ethnic community languages amongst the inhabitants of the rural area of Ibaba in southern Tanzania. Muzale and Rugemalira (2008) report that both English and Kiswahili dominate the domains which used to be predominantly for ethnic community languages in rural Tanzania. In urban areas, Kiswahili predominates although English remains the language of formal settings, e.g. high court and court of 32 UJAH Volume 20 No.1, 2019 appeal (Keya 2016). Batibo (2005) suggests that Tanzanian speech community has the following pattern: English and Kiswahili on top, areally dominant languages, e.g. Ruhaya, Sukuma, Nyakyusa, Maasai and Iraqw are amidst, and minority languages, e.g. Akie, Hadza, Ikizu, Mbugwe, Sandawe, and Segeju at the bottom of the hierarchy (Figure 1). The suggested pattern in Figure 1 is attained in many urban areas in the country. However, the current study of linguistic landscape in a small township of Orkesumet does not obtain the same picture. The picture of language use portrayed by Batibo (2005) does not reflect each and every situation in Tanzania. For instance, on the basis of a series of studies in Endamagha, Yaeda Chini and Mang’ola wards (Lake Eyasi area) in rural Tanzania, Lusekelo (2015) found the patterns in Figure 2. This pattern is slightly different from the previous one given by Batibo (2005). In this pattern, English is confined in very limited use of formal institutions, mainly in secondary schools where it is used in teaching. Four languages appear to be dominant in Hadzabeland, namely Kiswahili, Datooga, Iraqw and Nyisanzu. These are languages of wider communication around Lake Eyasi area. Higher status English and Kiswahili: The prominent languages in formal domains, e.g. schools and courts. Areally dominant languages: Majority languages such as Sukuma, Maasai and Nyakyusa are prominent languages of wider communication in informal settings. Minority languages: Least prominent languages which are confined to smaller populations and get used in narrow domains. Lower status Figure 1: Language use and predominance in Tanzania. 33 Lusekelo: The Linguistic Situation in Orkesumet Higher status English: The prominent language in formal domain of secondary education. Kiswahili: The prominent language in formal domains such as church and primary schools and informal domains like sports. Areally dominant languages: Majority languages, e.g. Datooga, Iraqw and Isanzu are prominent languages of wider communication in informal settings. Minority language of Hadzabe: Least prominent languages which are confined to the foragers. Lower status Figure 2: Language use and predominance around Lake Eyasi in Tanzania. In both patterns (Figure 1 and 2), the alignment of Kiswahili as the languages of wider communication remains central throughout the country (Blommaert 1992). Likewise, the predominance of English, which is the language of upward mobility (Blommaert 2013), cannot be overlooked. The current research was conducted within Simanjiro District. The research site is Orkesumet Township (see Map 1) (URT 2015). Data was gathered within the district headquarters at Orkesumet. Orkesumet is a typical Maasai township in Tanzania. Most of the Maasai people lived in the Maasai District. According to Hodgson (2005: 112-113, the Maasai District existed in the late 1950s but it was split into Kiteto District and Monduli District in 1974 and Ngorongoro District in 1979. According to URT (2013: 26, 190), the typical Maasai districts of Tanzania include Kiteto, Longido, Monduli, Ngorongoro, and Simanjiro. 34 UJAH Volume 20 No.1, 2019 Map 1: Administrative Wards in Simanjiro District (URT 2015) Historically, Orkesumet was predominantly a small Maasai village between 1957 and 1977 within the Maasai District of Tanzania (Jacobs 1978), which is now divided into several administrative districts, namely Arusha District Council, Kiteto, Longido, Monduli, Ngorongoro and Simanjiro
Recommended publications
  • Scripture Translations in Kenya
    / / SCRIPTURE TRANSLATIONS IN KENYA by DOUGLAS WANJOHI (WARUTA A thesis submitted in part fulfillment for the Degree of Master of Arts in the University of Nairobi 1975 UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI LIBRARY Tills thesis is my original work and has not been presented ior a degree in any other University* This thesis has been submitted lor examination with my approval as University supervisor* - 3- SCRIPTURE TRANSLATIONS IN KENYA CONTENTS p. 3 PREFACE p. 4 Chapter I p. 8 GENERAL REASONS FOR THE TRANSLATION OF SCRIPTURES INTO VARIOUS LANGUAGES AND DIALECTS Chapter II p. 13 THE PIONEER TRANSLATORS AND THEIR PROBLEMS Chapter III p . ) L > THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSLATORS AND THE BIBLE SOCIETIES Chapter IV p. 22 A GENERAL SURVEY OF SCRIPTURE TRANSLATIONS IN KENYA Chapter V p. 61 THE DISTRIBUTION OF SCRIPTURES IN KENYA Chapter VI */ p. 64 A STUDY OF FOUR LANGUAGES IN TRANSLATION Chapter VII p. 84 GENERAL RESULTS OF THE TRANSLATIONS CONCLUSIONS p. 87 NOTES p. 9 2 TABLES FOR SCRIPTURE TRANSLATIONS IN AFRICA 1800-1900 p. 98 ABBREVIATIONS p. 104 BIBLIOGRAPHY p . 106 ✓ - 4- Preface + ... This is an attempt to write the story of Scripture translations in Kenya. The story started in 1845 when J.L. Krapf, a German C.M.S. missionary, started his translations of Scriptures into Swahili, Galla and Kamba. The work of translation has since continued to go from strength to strength. There were many problems during the pioneer days. Translators did not know well enough the language into which they were to translate, nor could they get dependable help from their illiterate and semi­ literate converts.
    [Show full text]
  • National Environment Management Council (Nemc)
    NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (NEMC) NOTICE TO COLLECT APPROVED AND SIGNED ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATES Section 81 of the Environment Management Act, 2004 stipulates that any person, being a proponent or a developer of a project or undertaking of a type specified in Third Schedule, to which Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is required to be made by the law governing such project or undertaking or in the absence of such law, by regulation made by the Minister, shall undertake or cause to be undertaken, at his own cost an environmental impact assessment study. The Environmental Management Act, (2004) requires also that upon completion of the review of the report, the National Environment Management Council (NEMC) shall submit recommendations to the Minister for approval and issuance of certificate. The approved and signed certificates are returned to NEMC to formalize their registration into the database before handing over to the Developers. Therefore, the National Environment Management Council (NEMC) is inviting proponents/developers to collect their approved and signed certificates in the categories of Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Audit, Variation and Transfer of Certificates, as well as Provisional Environmental Clearance. These Certificates can be picked at NEMC’s Head office at Plot No. 28, 29 &30-35 Regent Street, Mikocheni Announced by: Director General, National Environment Management Council (NEMC), Plot No. 28, 29 &30-35 Regent Street, P.O. Box 63154, Dar es Salaam. Telephone: +255 22 2774889, Direct line: +255 22 2774852 Mobile: 0713 608930/ 0692108566 Fax: +255 22 2774901, Email: [email protected] No Project Title and Location Developer 1. Construction of 8 storey Plus Mezzanine Al Rais Development Commercial/Residential Building at plot no 8 block Company Ltd, 67, Ukombozi Mtaa in Jangwani Ward, Ilala P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Mbulu District Council
    MTSP MBULU DISTRICT COUNCIL TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1 PREFACE Statement of the council chairman 2 Statement of the District Executive Director 3-4 CHAPTER 1 Introduction 6-7 CHAPTER 2 Summary of Council profile 8-14 CHAPTER 3 Vision, Mission core values and Objectives 15-16 CHAPTER 4 Strategies and Targets 17-25 CHAPTER 5 Result Framework 26-44 1 PREFACE STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON Mbulu District council was established in 1984. The present population as at December 2007 is 286,725 basing on the growth rate of 3.8 percent (3.8%). The Government of the United Republic of Tanzania, Local Government has laid down good foundations whereby peace and stability continue to be historical benchmarks. It is the responsibility for the Mbulu District Council to ensure that good government is adhered to sustain peace and stability. The Council faces a number of Socio-economic problems that need joint efforts from stakeholders to encounter them. The proposed strategic plan is aiming at supporting the improvement of the socio-economic conditions of Mbulu community, identifying and exploring effective investment opportunities for the Council, development partners, government, NGOs and Private sectors. The core activities which will be executed have been planned in accordance to Government guidelines as well as various Development strategies. The priorities have been derived from the Tanzania National development vision 2025, the millennia Development Goals 2015, the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of poverty (NSGRP), CCM Election Manifesto October 2005 and Opportunities and Obstacles to Development approach. I hope the District Council staff will use the derived budget from the Strategic Plan according to the strategic plan guideline.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Technical Note on Indigenous Peoples' Issues
    Country Technical Note on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues United Republic of Tanzania Country Technical Notes on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Submitted by: IWGIA Date: June 2012 Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IFAD concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The designations ‗developed‘ and ‗developing‘ countries are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. All rights reserved Acronyms and abbreviations ACHPR African Commission on Human and Peoples‘ Rights ASDS Agricultural Sector Development Strategy AU African Union AWF African Wildlife Fund CBO Community Based Organization CCM Chama Cha Mapinduzi (Party of the Revolution) CELEP Coalition of European Lobbies for Eastern African Pastoralism CPS Country Partnership Strategy (World Bank) COSOP Country Strategic Opportunities Paper (IFAD) CWIP Core Welfare Indicator Questionnaire DDC District Development Corporation FAO Food and Agricultural Organization FBO Faith Based Organization FGM Female Genital Mutilation FYDP Five Year Development Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Forms and Drivers of Conflicts Between Farmers and Pastoralists in Kilosa and Kiteto Districts, Tanzania
    Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A 8 (2018) 333-349 doi: 10.17265/2161-6256/2018.06.001 D DAVID PUBLISHING Forms and Drivers of Conflicts between Farmers and Pastoralists in Kilosa and Kiteto Districts, Tanzania Parit Luka Saruni1, Justin Kalisti Urassa2 and George Chamungwana Kajembe3 1. Department of Social Studies, Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy, P.O. Box 9193, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 2. Department of Policy, Planning, and Management, College of Social Sciences and Humanities (CSSH), Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3024, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania 3. Department of Forest Resources Assessment and Management, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3013, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania Abstract: Farmer-pastoralist conflicts represent a significant challenge for rural communities and the Tanzanian government. The study objectives were to (i) determine existing forms of conflicts and (ii) identify drivers underlying resource use conflicts. The manuscript is based on a study that adopted a cross-sectional research design whereby data were collected from 373 randomly selected respondents from Kilosa and Kiteto districts, Tanzania, while primary data were collected through interviews, observations and focus group discussions, secondary data were gathered from government reports and newspapers. Quantitative data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out for quantitative data. Factor analysis was used to extract component factors on drivers and forms of conflicts, whereas content analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data. Generally, study results show that there were three main forms of conflict namely farmers versus pastoralists over village boundaries; farmers versus pastoralists over livestock routes and farmers versus farmers over the land.
    [Show full text]
  • Arumeru District Catherine W
    Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania Conservation agriculture in Africa series Series editors Bernard Triomphe Josef Kienzle Martin Bwalya Soren Damgaard-Larsen Titles Conservation agriculture as practised in Ghana Philip Boahen, Benjamin Addo Dartey, Genevieve Delali Dogbe, E. Asare Boadi, Bernard Triomphe, Soren Daamgard-Larsen, John Ashburner Conservation agriculture: a Uganda case study Paul Nyende, Anthony Nyakuni, John Peter Opio, Wilfred Odogola Conservation agriculture in Zambia: a case study of Southern Province Frédéric Baudron, Herbert M. Mwanza, Bernard Triomphe, Martin Bwalya Conservation agriculture as practised in Kenya: two case studies Pascal Kaumbutho, Josef Kienzle, editors Laikipia District Tom Apina, Paul Wamai, Philip Mwangi Siaya District Philip K. Mwangi, Kennedy O. Okelo, Tom Apina Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania: three case studies Richard Shetto, Marietha Owenya, editors Arumeru District Catherine W. Maguzu, Dominick E. Ringo, Wilfred Mariki, Marietha Owenya, Flora Kola, Charles Leseyo Karatu District Dominick E. Ringo, Catherine W. Maguzu, Wilfred Mariki, Marietha Owenya, Njumbo, Frank Swai Mbeya District Saidi Mkomwa, Ahaz Mussei, Remmy Mwakimbwala, Ndabhemeye Mulengera, Elimpaa Kiranga Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania: three case studies Richard Shetto, Marietha Owenya, editors Arumeru District Karatu District Mbeya District Publishers African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT) PO Box 14733, Westlands Nairobi 00800, Kenya tel and fax: +254 20 445 1391 website:
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Arusha City Council | Five Years Strategic Plan – 2016/2017 – 2020/2021 Page 1 Abbreviations TSD Cord - Teachers Service Department Coordinator WE - Water Engineer CALDO - City Agriculture and Livestock Development Officer LO - Land Officer CNRO - City Natural Resources Officer ROSA - Resource Oriented sanitation MVC - Most Vulnerable Children C/MENG - Municipal/City Engineer BE - Building Engineer RAS - Regional Administrative Secretariat IT - Information Technology MKURABITA – Mkakati wa Kuratibisha Rasilimali PLHIV - People Living with HIV AUWSA - Arusha Urban water Supply and Sewerage Authority MSO/CSO - Municipal/City Supplies officer MS/CS - Municipal/City Solicitor IA - Internal Auditor MECOM/CICOM - Municipal/City Economic Officer MT/CT - Municipal/City Treasurer MTO/CTO - Municipal/City Trade Officer CMOOH - City Medical Officer of Health CCDO - City Community Development Officer CEO(S) - City Education Officer (Secondary) NMS - National Minimum Standards CHMT - Council Health Management Team MEK - Mratibu Elimu Kata TSD - Teachers Service Department OUT - Open University of Tanzania UCC - University Computing Centre IAA - Institute of Accountancy Arusha VETA - Vocational Education Training Agency SLO - Statistics and Logistic Officer HRO - Human resource Officer CEO (P) - City Education Officer (Primary) Std - Standard DFT - District facilitation Team WFP - World Food Programme WFT - Ward Facilitation Team TSCP - Tanzania Strategic Cities Project TAHA - Tanzania Horticulture Association Arusha City Council | Five Years Strategic Plan – 2016/2017 – 2020/2021 Page 2 PMO-RALG – Prime Minister’s Office Regional Administration and Local Government MoFE - Ministry of Finance CBOs - Community Based Organizations ICT - Information Communication Technology CCP - Chuo Cha Polisi HoDs - Heads of Department AG - Attorney General WEO - ward Executive officer WDC - Ward Development Committee PMU - Procurement management Unit PPRA - Public Procurement regulatory Authority PSPTB - Procurement and Supply Pro.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders in Africa - Hisham K
    ANIMAL RESOURCES AND DIVERSITY IN AFRICA - Spiders In Africa - Hisham K. El-Hennawy SPIDERS IN AFRICA Hisham K. El-Hennawy Arachnid Collection of Egypt, Cairo, Egypt Keywords: Spiders, Africa, habitats, behavior, predation, mating habits, spiders enemies, venomous spiders, biological control, language, folklore, spider studies. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Africa, the continent of the largest web spinning spider known 1.2. Africa, the continent of the largest orb-web ever known 2. Spiders in African languages and folklore 2.1. The names for “spider” in Africa 2.2. Spiders in African folklore 2.3. Scientific names of spider taxa derived from African languages 3. How many spider species are recorded from Africa? 3.1. Spider families represented in Africa by 75-100% of world species 3.2. Spider families represented in Africa by more than 400 species 4. Where do spiders live in Africa? 4.1. Agricultural lands 4.2. Deserts 4.3. Mountainous areas 4.4. Wetlands 4.5. Water spiders 4.6. Spider dispersal 4.7. Living with others – Commensalism 5. The behavior of spiders 5.1. Spiders are predatory animals 5.2. Mating habits of spiders 6. Enemies of spiders 6.1. The first case of the species Pseudopompilus humboldti: 6.2. The second case of the species Paracyphononyx ruficrus: 7. Development of spider studies in Africa 8. Venomous spiders of Africa 9. BeneficialUNESCO role of spiders in Africa – EOLSS 10. Conclusion AcknowledgmentsSAMPLE CHAPTERS Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary There are 7935 species, 1116 genera, and 79 families of spiders recorded from Africa. This means that more than 72% of the known spider families of the world are represented in the continent, while only 19% of the described spider species are ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) ANIMAL RESOURCES AND DIVERSITY IN AFRICA - Spiders In Africa - Hisham K.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross -Linguistic Study of Animal Metaphors: a Case Study of Kamba and Maasai Languages
    A CROSS -LINGUISTIC STUDY OF ANIMAL METAPHORS: A CASE STUDY OF KAMBA AND MAASAI LANGUAGES BY MUANGE CATHERINE NDUNGE C50/80597/2015 A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT OF THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF ARTS, IN LINGUISTICS DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGES, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI. 2018 i DECLARATION This research project is my original work and has not been submitted for examination in any other university. Signature:…………………………………… Date……………………………… Muange Catherine Ndunge This project has been submitted for examination with our approval of the university supervisors. Signature:…………………………………… Date……………………………… Prof. Helga Schroeder University of Nairobi Signature:…………………………………… Date……………………………… Prof. Lilian Kaviti University of Nairobi ii DEDICATION To my beloved husband Charles. Thank you for your heartfelt support towards achieving my Dream. To my lovely children, Frank and Audrey, your patience and understanding is worthy this great achievement. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First I would like to thank God for his guidance and inspiration throughout my Masters programme. Indeed, this was a divine mission. I would also like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Prof. Schroeder for the patience, guidance, dedication and immeasurable support during my project writing journey. Prof. you made me realize that nothing is impossible in this world. God bless you to assist many more achieve their dreams. My special thanks go to all the lecturers in the Department of Linguistics. This dream has come true because of your love to share without reservation in the field of Linguistics. Thanks to you Dr. Mungania, Dr. Marete, Prof. Manyora, Dr. Ayub Mukhwana, Dr. Atoh, Prof. Maloba, Late Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 African Language Classification Beyond Greenberg
    1 "Areal linguistics in Africa before a new approach to its genealogical language classification" Lecture 1, LLACAN, Paris, 9/3/2019 2 + his earliest classification was received positively - Westermann (1952: 256): 1 African language classification beyond Greenberg Greenberg is the first linguist who has attempted to give a classification of the whole range of Tom Güldemann African languages. He has not contented himself with a general survey, as all his predecessors, Humboldt University Berlin and Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History Jena including myself, have done, but has gone into considerable detail; in each single case he gives his proofs in word-lists, in tabulated formative elements, and also on sketch maps; he does not 1.1 Before and after Greenberg (1963) quote all his sources, which would have been practically impossible; nor is it essential, since they are known to the expert. He confirms many findings of those who have worked before 1.1.1 African language classification before Greenberg him, he corrects a number of errors; although many of these had been refuted by others, it had seldom been done with such clarity and definiteness as here. It is quite possible that some of + relying heavily on non-linguistic criteria, couched in colonial European attitudes to Africa his statements and classifications may prove to be not sufficiently clarified, or that he has (notably "Hamitic theory") overlooked a language which cannot be shown to be related to any other in Africa; he will be + highly synthetic: 3-5 genealogically intended super-groups criticized, and some of his classifications may be rejected; but all this does not detract from the value of his study, for which all of us have to thank him.
    [Show full text]
  • Wearing an Amulet: Land Titling and Tenure (In) Security in Tanzania
    Wearing an amulet: Land titling and tenure (in) security in Tanzania A dissertation presented by Anne Fitzgerald to the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology Maynooth University Department of Anthropology February 2017 Head of Department: Dr Mark Maguire Supervisor: Dr Abdullahi El Tom Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................... iv Declaration ................................................................................................................................ v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. vi List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Locating Land Reform in Tanzania....................................................................................... 10 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 16 Thesis Questions .................................................................................................................. 19 Imagining Tradition ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arusha District Council
    ARUSHA DISTRICT COUNCIL INVESTMENT PROFILE DISCLOSE THE POTENTIAL OF ARUSHA DISTRICT COUNCIL February, 2017 FOREWORD I would like to welcome all esteemed investors to explore the irresistible opportunities provided by the Arusha District Council. Arusha District Council was established in 2007, the Council has a vision of to be a leading transformed Council that provides high quality services for Sustainable Development of the Community by 2025. In order to increase competitiveness in attracting investors to our District Council, effort and initiative to identify, expose and promote investment opportunities available in Arusha District Council is going on. We are indeed determined to utilize potential areas owned by the Council, Communities and those own by private developer. In this Investment Profile, we give you opportunities to realize your entrepreneurial ambitions and explore them. We believe in supporting our investors’ aspirations as the Council. As we want to be one among the leading investment avenues in Tanzania. In Arusha District Council investors are favoured with presence of suitable investment climate that will help you capitalize on untapped opportunities in Arusha and Tanzania as a whole. Whereby investment can be done to the following areas of interests include tourism, processing industries, livestock and agricultural sector, beekeeping, sports and recreation centre, modern market, real estate, socio-economic services. Investment climate is characterised by peace and stability, availability of raw materials, market, abundant natural resources, road and transportation network, electricity services and the strategic geographical location will support establishment and success of investments. It is because of the above mention few facts we are proud to say that Arusha District Council is the best investment destination of your choice.
    [Show full text]