DOCSLIB.ORG

Ground-Water Geology of the Coastal Zone Long Beach-Santa Ana Area, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ground-Water Geology of the Coastal Zone Long Beach-Santa Ana Area, California Ground-water Geology of the Coastal Zone Long Beach-Santa Ana Area, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1109 Prepared in cooperation with the Orange County F?nod Control District, the 0/jja^-t, iJvjgfey ff^ater District, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, and the Board of W^ater Commissioners of the city of Long Beach, all of California Ground-water Geology of the Coastal Zone Long Beach-Santa Ana Area, California By J. F. POLAND, A. M. PIPER, and others GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1109 Prepared in cooperation with the Orange County Flood Control District, the Orange County W^ater District, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, and the Board of W^ater Commissioners of the city of Long Beach, all of California STAT^J^OVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1956 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director * For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government A'nilng Office Washington 25. D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract _ _ ___-____-___---_-__ -_-_______-----__--_-__-_.____..__ 1 Introduction. ______-__-__-__--___---_-_-_-__-______-_-..__-_____-.__ 4 Scope of the investigation___________--____________- _ _______ 4 Acknowledgments. ___-----__--_--_-------_---_________-____..__ 8 Numbers applied to wells by the Geological Survey_._____.-______. 9 Land forms of the coastal-plain area.___--___-_-___-___--_----_______ 11 General features..._-----__----_-_---------__-_________-_______ 11 Bordering highlands.______.__--__-_-__-_-________--__--.______ 12 Inland foothills___________._._.___.._ __. _ ... 13 Alluvial aprons adjacent to highlands and foothills. _____________ 14 Newport-Inglewood belt of hills and plains___----___-____-________ 16 Common genetic features--___------_------_-----_-_-_--____ 16 Pronounced uplifts along the axis_-_______--________-________ 19 Mesas and related plains-_-----_-__---_---_-_-___---_______ 23 Gaps___._____--___-.______________.___ 28 El Segundo sandhills.----------------- ___ 33 Downey Plain__-_.___._-_-__--_________________-__ _______ 34 Stratigraphy and general water-bearing characteristics of the rocks._____ 36 Sequence and general features---~_--_-____________---_-_--______ 36 Quaternary system.___________________________________________ 40 Recent series______--__-___-_-_____-__-_______-_-______-_ 40 Definition ____________--__-___-__-----___-_____-____-_ 40 Physical character and mode of origin.___________________ 40 General features___-_----_---_----_--_-_--____-___- 40 Upper division, inland from the coastal hills and mesas. 40 Marsh deposits and peat beds_____-_________________ 41 £* ' Beach deposits__----------_-------_--------_-_--_- 43 J_^-^ Extent and thickness of the upper division__________ 43 Lower division, Talbert and Gaspur water-bearing zon es_ 44 Lower division, minor water-bearing zones,___________ 45 General water-bearing features-_---_-_--_-----_---__-_-- 48 Pleistocene series------------------------------------------ 52 General features____--___---_-----------------_-----__- 52 Terrace cover and Palos Verdes sand___--______-_-_____ 52 Unnamed upper Pleistocene deposits.---_________________ 55 Character, thickness, and extent in the coastal zone of the Long Beach-Santa Ana area-___--___-_________ 55 Stratigraphic relations___--_____---------_---_-_-__. 58 Correlation with areas beyond the coastal zone________ 59 San Pedro formation___-_-_-_--__-----_-----_____-_-___ 60 Definition ________________________________________ 60 Representative exposed sections.__-_-______-__-_____ 62 Faunal data from outcrops and from wells-___________ 64 Physical character.__---------_--------__-----_____ 68 >_ m TV CONTENTS Stratigraphy and general water-bearing characteristics of the rocks Con. Quaternary system Continued Pleistocene series Continued San Pedro formation Continued Page Thickness.-__-___-________________________ 75 Environments of deposition________________________. 78 General water-bearing features______________________ 84 Tertiary system_______________________________________________ 86 Pliocene series___________________________________________ 86 Pico formation, upper division.. ________________________ 87 Physical character and thickness____________________ 87 Stratigraphic relations____________________________ 89 Water-bearing characteristics _______________________ 90 Pico formation, middle and lower divisions________________ 92 Older rocks of Tertiary age_________________________________ 92 Geologic structure_______-_____-___--____--__-_-_---_-_-___-_______ 93 Regional features._____________________________________________ 93 Newport-Inglewood structural zone._____________________________ 94 General features__-_____--__---__-----_--__----_--_----____ 94 Folds-.____._______________________________________ 96 Faults.--. ______________________________________ 97 Dominguez Hill area_________________________________ 97 Cherry-Hill fault..-.__-_______________________ 98 Northeast flank fault_________________________________ 99 Pickler fault.--.____________________________________ 99 Reservoir Hill fault---------_---------_------------_--_ 100 Seal Beach fault___-________--_-_-___-____---__________ 100 Faulting from Landing Hill to Huntington Beach Mesa____ 101 Faults on Huntington Beach Mesa and in Santa Ana Gap__ 102 Faults in Newport Mesa area______-__-___-_--___--___-_ 104 Zones of cementation in the Pleistocene rocks_________________ 104 Summary of geologic features related to ground-water regimen__________ 107 Regional bodies of ground water_________________________________ 107 General features of the principal fresh-water body _________________ 109 Displacement of saline connate water.______________,-£i______ . 109 Replenishment and circulation________________________J______ 111 Permeability and transmissibility of the water-bearing materials. 114 Chemical character-___-_--___-_____-__---_____---_________ 115 Origin of the sodium bicarbonate waters.._-___--_--__________ 118 Barrier effect of the Newport-Inglewood structural zone.___________ 119 Generalfeatures-_______-__-_-___---__--__--_----__________ 119 Alluvial deposits of Recent age_____-___-____-_-_---_________ 120 Deposits of Pleistocene age San Pedro formation_____________ 121 Discontinuities in water-bearing strata.__________________ 122 Structural traps____--________-________________________ 123 Zones of cementation __ ________________________________ 123 Upper division of the Pico formation____________________.____ 125 Rocks of the connate-water zone.______----_---_-___________ 126 Selected records of wells____________________________________________ 126 Literature cited___________________________________________________ 157 Index.___-_-___-_-._-__-_--___-__--_-__---_-____.___--___________ 161 CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS [All plates in pocket] PLATE 1. Map of the coastal plain and its borders, showing extent of land-form elements. 2. Land-surface profiles along and across the Newport-Inglewood belt. 3. Geologic map of the coastal zone in the Long Beach-Santa Ana area, California, showing location of water wells. 4. Geologic sections. A-A', Along the Newport-Inglewood structural zone from Dominguez Hill to Newport Mesa; B-B', from Terminal Island through Dominguez Gap; C-C", across Signal Hill; D-D', from Newport Beach north­ ward across Newport Mesa. 5. Detailed sections in the Long Beach-Santa Ana area, a-a', From Landing Hill diagonally across Sunset Gap; b b', from Bolsa Chica Mesa to Huntington Beach Mesa; c-c' f through Santa Ana Gap. 6. Diagrammatic correlation of stratigraphic columns along the coastal zone of the Long Beach-Santa Ana area. 7. Map and geologic sections showing extent, thickness, and character of the Gaspur and Talbert water-bearing zones in the deposits of Recent age. 8. Map showing extent, altitude of base, and thickness of the Silverado water-bearing zone in the Long Beach area, Los Angeles County. FIGXTRE 1. Map of California showing area covered by this report and that covered by figure 2________________________________ 2. Generalized geologic map of the coastal plain and contiguous areas in Los Angeles and Orange Counties-_______________ CHART Page Stratigraphy of the coastal zone in the Long Beach-Santa Ana area______ 38 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Size analyses of the Hanford fine sandy loam in the Long Beach-Santa Ana area.__--___-___-----_---_______-___-_ 41 2. Percentage distribution of wells by depth ranges, in three mile- wide strips across Downey Plain.________________________ 49 3. Generalized log for well 4/12-28H1 (city of Long Beach, Ala- mitos well 9)________________________________________ 81 4. Materials penetrated by typical shallow observation wells in the coastal zone of the Long Beach-Santa Ana area_________ 127 5. Records of six deep observation wells on the coastal side of the Newport-Inglewood structural zone___---_-_________-_____ 132 6. Materials penetrated by typical water-supply wells in the coastal zone of the Long Beach-Santa Ana area.___________ 135 GROUND-WATER GEOLOGY OF THE COASTAL ZONE, LONG BEACH-SANTA ANA AREA, CALIFORNIA By J. F. POLAND, A. M. PIPER, and others ABSTRACT This paper is the first chapter of a comprehensive report on the ground-water features in the southern part of the coastal plain in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, Calif., with special reference to the effectiveness of the so-callec? coastal barrier the Newport-Inglewood structural zone in restraining landward move­ ment of saline water. The coastal plain in Los Angeles and
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

168 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Section 4.0: Public Facilities Plan
    The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Section 4.0: Public Facilities Plan The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Section 4.0: Public Facilities Plan The Public Facilities Plan contains a description of the proposed plans for transportation, utilities, infrastructure and services for the Specific Plan area. The first two Subsections describe planned regional improvements which have an impact on the project. The improvements described under each of the remaining sections are intended to summarize all the services needed for build out of The Disneyland Resort project with the exception of any improvements which may be identified through further environmental review associated with the Future Expansion District. As described in Section 3.4, the primary objective of the Phasing Plan is to minimize the effect of construction on the local street thoroughfares while ensuring the provision of adequate infrastructure and allowing the smooth operation of existing uses during construction. Each proposed public facility improvement summarized in this Section is followed by a number that indicates in which of the project phases the improvement will be made. More detailed information concerning the proposed public facilities/services is contained in Final EIR No. 311 including the Addendum and modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067 associated there- with. Additional information is contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addenda prepared in connection with Specific Plan Amendment Nos. 5, 6 and 8 4.1 Regional pertaining to the Anaheim GardenWalk project. Circulation Programs Currently, several major facilities provide vehicular access to the Specific Plan area. They include Interstate 5, Harbor Boulevard, Ball Road, West Street, Haster Street, and Katella Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Element Designates the General Distribution and Location Patterns of Such Uses As Housing, Business, Industry, and Open Space
    CIRCULATION ELEMENT CITY OF HAWTHORNE GENERAL PLAN Adopted April, 1990 Prepared by: Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc. 1028 North Lake Avenue, Suite 107 Pasadena, California 91104 Revision Table Date Case # Resolution # 07/23/2001 2001GP01 6675 06/28/2005 2005GP03 & 04 6967 12/09/2008 2008GP03 7221 06/26/2012 2012GP01 7466 12/04/2015 2015GP02 7751 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. Introduction to the Circulation Element 1 Purpose of this Element 1 Relation to Other General Plan Elements 1 II. Existing Conditions 2 Freeways 2 Local Vehicular Circulation and Street Classification 3 Transit Systems 4 Para-transit Systems 6 Transportation System Management 6 TSM Strategies 7 Non-motorized Circulation 7 Other Circulation Related Topics 8 III. Issues and Opportunities 10 IV. Circulation Element Goals and Policies 11 V. Crenshaw Station Active Transportation Plan 23 Circulation Element March 1989 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Figure1: Street Classification 17 Figure 2: Traffic Volume Map 18 Figure 3: Roadway Standards 19 Figure 4: Truck Routes 20 Figure 5: Level of Service 21 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Definitions of Level-of-Service 22 Circulation Element March 1989 SECTION I - INTRODUCTION TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT Circulation and transportation systems are one of the most important of all urban systems in determining the overall structure and form of the areas they service. The basic purpose of a transportation network within the City of Hawthorne is the provision of an efficient, safe, and serviceable framework which enables people to move among various sections of the city in order to work, shop, or spend leisure hours.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5 Geology/Soils
    3.5 GEOLOGY/SOILS 3.5.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes the project’s impacts related to geology and soils, including such factors as seismology, soils, topography, and erosion. It also includes an examination of potential hazards associated with potential damage to proposed structures and infrastructure from ground shaking, potential liquefaction hazards and soils and soils stability. Applicable laws, regulations and relevant local planning policies that pertain to geology are also discussed. Much of the information contained in this subsection was based upon the following geotechnical reports submitted by consultants under contract to the Chandler’s Palos Verdes Sand and Gravel Company and the peer review of those technical studies by Arroyo/Willdan Geotechnical: Geologic Constraints Investigation of the Chandler’s Inert Solid Land Fill Quarry and Surrounding Properties, Rolling Hills Estates, California, Earth Consultants International, June 15, 2000. Phase I Geologic and Geotechnical Engineering Study to Determine Potential Development Areas within the Chandler’s P.V. Sand and Gravel Company Property, Adjacent Trust Properties and the Rolling Hills Country Club, Rolling Hills Estates, California, Neblett & Associates, Inc., December 2001. Fault Investigation, Phases I and II, Chandler Quarry and Rolling Hills Country Club, Palos Verdes Estates, California, Neblett & Associates, Inc., April 29, 2005. Geotechnical Review, Geologic and Geotechnical Engineering Study, Potential Development Areas within the Chandler’s P.V. Sand and Gravel Company Property, Adjacent Trust Properties, and the Rolling Hills Country Club, City of Rolling Hills Estates, California, prepared by Arroyo Geotechnical, September 24, 2007. Review of Response Report, Geotechnical Review, Geologic and Geotechnical Engineering Study, Potential Development Areas within the Chandler’s P.V.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Volume of the Complete Palos Verdes Anticlinorium: Stratigraphic
    The Volume of the Complete Palos Verdes Anticlinorium: Stratigraphic Horizons for the Community Fault Model Christopher Sorlien, Leonardo Seeber, Kris Broderick, Doug Wilson Figure 1: Faults, earthquakes, and locations. Lower hemisphere earthquake focal mechanisms, labeled by year, are from USGS and SCEC (1994), with location of 1930 earthquake (open circle) from Hauksson and Saldivar (1986). The surface or seafloor traces, or upper edges of blind faults are from the Southern California Earthquake Center Community Fault Model (Plesch and Shaw, 2002); other faults are from Sorlien et al. (2006). Figure 2 is located by red dashed polygon. L.A.=Los Angeles (downtown); LB=Long Beach (city and harbor); PVA=Palos Verdes anticlinorium, Peninsula and Hills, PVF=Palos Verdes fault; SPBF=San Pedro Basin fault; SMM=Santa Monica Mountains; SPS=San Pedro Shelf. Structural Setting If the water and post-Miocene sedimentary rocks were removed, the Los Angeles (L.A.) area would have huge relief, most of which was generated in the Plio-Pleistocene (Fig. 1; Wright, 1991). The five km-deep L.A. basin would be isolated from other basins to the SW by a major anticline-ridge, the Palos Verdes Anticlinorium (PVA), parallel to the current NW-SE coastline (Davis et al., 1989; Figures 2, 3). The Palos Verdes Hills have been long recognized as a contractional structure, but of dimensions similar to the peninsula (e.g., Woodring et al., 1946). This prominent topographic feature is instead only the exposed portion of the much larger PVA (Fig 2). Submerged parts of the PVA had previously been interpreted as separate anticlines (Nardin and Henyey, 1978; Legg et al., 2004) related in part to bends in strike-slip faults (Ward and Valensise, 1994), rather than a single complex structure above low-angle (oblique) thrust faults.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 72 January 1950 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 11.PPACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 Prepared by San Francisco District UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director WASHINGTON, D. C. Free on application to the Director, Geological Survey, Washington 26, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 11.PPACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 EXPLANATION The index lists the stream-flow ana reservoir stations in the Pacific Slope Basins in California for which records have been or are to be pub­ lished for periods prior to September 30, 1948. The stations are listed in downstream order. Tributary streams are indicated by indention. Station names are given in their most recently published forms. Paren­ theses around part of a station name indicate that the enclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or in a name under which records were published by some agency other than the Geological Survey. The drainage areas, in square miles, are the latest figures published or otherwise available at this time. Drainage areas that were obviously inconsistent with other drainage areas on the same stream have been omitted. Some drainage areas not published by the Geological Survey are listed with an appropriate footnote stating the published source of the figure of drainage area. Under "period of record" breaks of less than a 12-month period are not shown. A dash not followed immediately by a closing date shows that the station was in operation on September 30, 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Disneylandforward Project Description July 20, 2021 to Allow
    DisneylandForward Project Description July 20, 2021 To allow continued, long-term growth of The Disneyland Resort®, DisneylandForward (Project) will provide more flexibility as to location for permitted uses within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP) area and at properties within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) area owned or controlled by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (the Applicant) or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company (Disney’s ARSP Properties). The Project also will provide for future streamlined review by the City of Anaheim (City) of the Applicant’s projects within the DRSP area and at Disney’s ARSP Properties. Both the DRSP and the ARSP are located within an area of the City known as The Anaheim Resort®, which encompasses approximately 1,078 acres generally located adjacent to and southwest of Interstate 5 (I-5) between Ball Road to the north, Walnut Street to the west, and Chapman Avenue to the south. The Project will cover The Disneyland Resort, including the existing Theme Park, Hotel, Parking and Future Expansion Districts, as well as the following Disney ARSP Properties in the ARSP Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1): 1515 S. Manchester Avenue (currently used as the Manchester Cast Member Lot); 1585 S. Manchester Avenue (currently used as an office building and the Manchester Cast Member Lot); 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard (currently used as the Manchester Cast Member Lot); 1900 S. Harbor Boulevard (currently used as the Toy Story Parking Lot); 333 W. Ball Road (currently used as the Harbor Cast Member Lot); and 1717 S.
    [Show full text]
  • August 16, 2017 VIA E-MAIL and U.S. MAIL David Belmer Planning
    www.msrlegal.com Sean Marciniak August 16, 2017 VIA E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL David Belmer Linda N. Andal, CMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Anaheim City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department Planning and Building Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Anaheim, California 92805 Email: dbelmer@anaheim.net Email: landal@anaheim.net Re: Response to February 9, 2017 letter re Disneyland Resort Eastern Gateway Project and request for information under the California Public Records Act Dear Mr. Belmer and Ms. Andal: Thank you for your responses to our Public Records Act request of March 5, 2017 regarding the Disneyland Resort’s1 proposed Eastern Gateway Project (“Project”). We have had an opportunity to review the documents that you provided (the “Responses”), and respectfully request that the City disclose further information and documents that were identified in the Responses, but never released for our review. This information includes: Information about the City’s decision not to prepare a health risk assessment of the Project, which would evaluate the Project’s cancer and non-cancer disease risks to nearby residents and other sensitive receptors. We requested a full air quality study in our letter of January 2, 2017, and at least one of the City’s environmental consultants also proposed such a study. Traffic and noise studies that the Project applicant prepared, and that the City peer-reviewed. Such studies are not subject to the exemptions and privileges listed in your letter of March 30, 2017. Additional materials concerning impacts of the Project on historic resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaheim Tourism Improvement District
    Anaheim Tourism Improvement District ‐ Participating Properties Number Hotel List Address Zip Code City 1 Alamo Inn and Suite 1140 W Katella Ave 92802‐2805 Anaheim 2 Alpine Motel 715 W Katella Ave 92802 Anaheim 3 America's Best Inns and Suites 425 W Katella Ave 92802 Anaheim 4 Anabella Hotel 1030 W Katella Ave 92802 Anaheim 5 Anaheim Camelot Inn and Suites 1520 S Harbor Blvd 92802 Anaheim 6 Anaheim Carriage Inn 2125 S Harbor Blvd 92802‐3515 Anaheim 7 Anaheim Courtyard by Marriott 2045 S. Harbor Boulevard 92802 Anaheim 8 Anaheim Del Sol 1604 S Harbor Blvd 92802‐2314 Anaheim 9 Anaheim Desert Inn and Suites‐Disneyland 1600 S Harbor Blvd 92802 Anaheim 10 Anaheim Desert Palms Hotel and Suites 631 W Katella Ave 92802 Anaheim 11 Anaheim Discovery Inn & Suites 1126 W Katella Ave 92802 Anaheim 12 Anaheim Harbor RV Park, L.P. 1009 S. Harbor Blvd 92805 Anaheim 13 Anaheim Luxury Suites 620 W Orangewood Ave 92802 Anaheim 14 Anaheim Marriott 700 W Convention Way 92802 Anaheim 15 Anaheim Overnite Trailer Park 2156 S. Harbor Blvd 92802 Anaheim 16 Anaheim Plaza Hotel and Suites 1700 S Harbor Blvd 92802‐2375 Anaheim 17 Anaheim Rodeway Inn Maingate 1211 S West Place 92802 Anaheim 18 Anaheim RV Village 333 W. Ball Road 92805 Anaheim 19 Arena Inn & Suites 130 W Katella Ave 92802‐3602 Anaheim 20 Ayres Hotel 2550 E Katella Ave 92806 Anaheim 21 Best Western Anaheim Inn 1630 S Harbor Blvd 92802 Anaheim 22 Best Western Courtesy Inn 1070 W Ball Rd 92802‐1804 Anaheim 23 Best Western Park Place Inn and Mini Suites 1544 S Harbor Blvd 92802 Anaheim 24 Best Western Raffles Inn & Suites 2040 S Harbor Blvd Anaheim 92802 Anaheim 25 Best Western Stovall's Inn 1110 W Katella Ave 92802 Anaheim 26 Best Western‐Pavillions 1176 W Katella Ave 92802 Anaheim 27 Budget Inn 1042 W Ball Rd 92802‐1804 Anaheim 28 Candy Cane Inn 1747 S Harbor Blvd 92802 Anaheim 29 Carousel Inn and Suites 1530 S Harbor Blvd 92801 Anaheim 30 Castle Inn 1734 S Harbor Blvd 92802‐2374 Anaheim 31 Clarion Hotel Anaheim Resort 616 W Convention Way 92802 Anaheim 32 Classic Motel 909 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Badge Registration and Housing Information
    BADGE REGISTRATION AND HOUSING INFORMATION This information is also available on the NAMM Web site: www.namm.org • R & B Badge Lounge • Will Call • Badge Registration • Online Hotel Reservation Information • Official Hotel List • Hotel Location Map • Hotel Fax Reservation Form • Event Space at Officials Hotels • Online Interactive Event Reservation Form • Official Hotels Offering Suites • Exhibitor Suite Reservation Form R & B BADGE LOUNGE The NAMM R & B Lounge is located below the escalator in Hall E Lobby and is reserved exclusively for red and blue badge holders, including manufacturers’ reps and Press. This large business center offers meeting tables, e-mail access, free wireless internet, limited copy services and language translators upon request. A receptionist will also be on hand to assist Members with their business center needs. Only attendees wearing a Red (Exhibitor), Blue (Buyer) or clear (Press) badges will be permitted in the R & B Lounge. WILL CALL HAS IMPROVED! Save Money and Time by Picking Up Your Badges at Will Call Improvements in technology and enhancements in NAMM’s Will Call system have resulted in this being a great option for everyone to have their NAMM badge waiting for them at the NAMM Show. There are a number of reasons to use Will Call over mailing badges: • We get GREEN by not wasting paper. • Save money and time by avoiding on-site badge fees and registration lines. • Experience the flexibility of having 24-hour access to update, add or change a NAMM badge electronically by logging on to the NAMM web site. • Each attendee will receive an individual badge confirmation via email.
    [Show full text]
  • X Safety Element
    X SAFETY ELEMENT Adopted September 2018 Source: Miwa, Moto. 2010. “North Star over Rancho Palos Verdes, CA.” Flickr. Accessed at https://flic.kr/p/8buWEa. June 18, 2010. Table of Contents Safety Element 1 Goals ................................................................................................................................................. S-6 2 Policies .............................................................................................................................................. S-6 3 Wildland Fires ................................................................................................................................. S-9 3.1 Wildland Fires 3.2 Interface Fires 3.3 Urban Fires 3.4 Other Factors Leading to Fires 3.5 Fire Hazard Zone Figure 1: Fire Hazard Severity Zone 4 Flood Hazard ............................................................................................................................... S-14 4.1 Water Storage Facility Failure Figure 2: Potential Flood & Inundation Hazards 5 Geologic Hazards ....................................................................................................................... S-17 5.1 Seismic Hazards Table 1: Faults in the Region 5.2 Active and Potentially Active Faults 5.3 Landslides Figure 3: Landslide Inventory 5.4 Liquefaction Figure 4: Landslides & Liquefaction 5.5 Tsunamis 5.6 Seiches 5.7 Settlement or Subsidence 5.8 Expansive Soils 5.9 Coastal Cliff Retreat 6 Climate Change .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dominguez Channel and Machado Lake Watersheds
    LA SUSTAINABLE WATER PROJECT: DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL AND MACHADO LAKE WATERSHEDS This report is a product of the UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, UCLA Sustainable LA Grand Challenge, and Colorado School of Mines. AUTHORS Kathryn Mika, Terri Hogue, Stephanie Pincetl, Elizabeth Gallo, Mark Gold AFFILIATIONS UCLA Grand Challenges, Sustainable LA 2248 Murphy Hall Los Angeles, CA 90005-1405 UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability La Kretz Hall, Suite 300 Box 951496 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1496 Colorado School of Mines 1500 Illinois Street Golden, CO 80401 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation (LASAN). Many thanks to LASAN for providing ideas and direction, facilitating meetings and data requests, as well as sharing the many previous and current research efforts that provided us with invaluable infor- mation on which to build. Further, LASAN provided edits which helped to deepen and improve this report. Any findings, opinions, or conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of LASAN. We would further like to acknowledge the many organizations which facilitated this research through providing data, conversations, and insights into the integrated water management world in the Los Angeles region: LADWP, LACDPW, LARWQCB, LACFCD, WRD, WBMWD, MWD, SCCWRP, the Mayor’s Office of Sustainability, and many others. 1 | LA Sustainable Water Project; Dominguez Channel & Machado Lake Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E2: Fault Rupture Hazard Investigation
    SOLANA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DRAFT EIR CITY OF TORRANCE Appendices Appendix E2: Fault Rupture Hazard Investigation June 2019 SOLANA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DRAFT EIR CITY OF TORRANCE Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks FAULT RUPTURE HAZARD INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD AND VIA VALMONTE TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR MKS RESIDENTIAL SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. A9201-06-01C JANUARY 21, 2016 Project No. A9201-06-01 January 21, 2016 MKS Residential 444 South Cedros Avenue Solana Beach, California 92705 Attention: Mr. Derek Empey, Senior Vice President Development Subject: FAULT RUPTURE HAZARD INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD AND VIA VALMONTE TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Empey: Geocon West, Inc. is pleased to submit this revised report summarizing our fault rupture hazard investigation for the proposed multi-family residential development located near Hawthorne Boulevard and Via Valmonte in the city of Torrance, California. The site is located within the boundaries of a city-designated Fault Hazard Management Zone for the Palos Verdes Fault. The purpose of our evaluation was to identify faults that may traverse the site and evaluate the potential for surface fault rupture. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service. Very truly yours, GEOCON WEST, INC. Susan F. Kirkgard CEG 1754 TABLE
    [Show full text]