Now We Should All Acknowledge Our Holocaust Guilt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Now We Should All Acknowledge Our Holocaust Guilt Now we should all acknowledge our holocaust guilt European policymaking isn’t just about the future, it also concerns the past, writes Alfred Pijpers who welcomes moves in the European Parliament and the Commission to make the re-assessment of national responsibilities during World War II a building block for the idea of European citizenship erlin’s moving holocaust monument These feelings received fresh impetus is an acknowledgement that the with German reunification and the Berlin Bannihilation of European Jewry during Republic. In 1998, German writer Martin World War II was Nazi driven and the primary Walser proposed putting a stop to the responsibility of Germany. The country’s country’s collective penance, arguing that post-war politicians and governments those who want to commemorate the conscientiously accepted this responsibility holocaust should do so at home. Walser – in West Germany at least. The Federal became the target of fierce criticism from Republic’s constitution, electoral system, Jewish circles, yet there were many Germans foreign policy and European treaties all are who sided with him, the then Chancellor guarantees that history will never repeat Gerhard Schröder being among them. itself. The official – penitent – attitude of Germans know that the Federal Germany will not change for the time being. Republic has had to be the public But suppose that the younger German embodiment of this huge historic guilt, but generations, with some justification, no the question arises: guilt for how long? The longer want to be the principal bearers of overwhelming majority of Germans were historic “guilt”. Who should then take up born after the war, and are no more guilty the burden? The destruction of European of the Nazi crimes than, say, their Dutch, Jewry is still too recent and too immense to Polish, French or Spanish contemporaries. be neglected. It also very much needs an It is unfair to keep them and future German official, governmental platform of generations forever accountable for the remembrance. In my view, the best way holocaust. As far back as the 1960s, forward is to create a truly European Bavarian leader Franz Joseph Strauss framework, and two arguments support this argued that a state as successful as the idea: European complicity with Nazi crimes, Federal Republic should not forever be and the developing concept of European reminded of Auschwitz. citizenship. 124 | Europe’s World Autumn 2006 Although Hitler’s Germany was the driving force behind the extermination of the Jews, COMMENTARY other European countries had a considerable By William Schabas hand in the catastrophe, and most of them are now member states of the European But still we should be Union. Austria, for instance, became after the Anschluss an integral part of the Third Reich, careful about how and offered a rich pool of highly-placed Nazis. A disproportionately large number of we define “guilt” them served in the extermination camps, predominantly as volunteers. Mussolini’s lfred Pijpers is right to remind us of the anti- Italy was an ally of Hitler’s Germany, although semitic elements in countries occupied by Italian fascists adopted a more moderate Athe Nazis, and their involvement in the attitude towards their Jewish countrymen. persecution of the Jews alongside whom they had Vichy France was a German satellite with an lived for centuries. He will surely upset some who openly anti-semitic regime. When at the end are embarrassed about the forgotten history, or of 1942 the Germans occupied that part of who are still in denial. The Germans certainly had France too, and began large-scale no monopoly on anti-semitism. There are even deportations, the ground had already been some omissions in his list of offenders. For well prepared. To his credit, President Jacques example, he doesn’t mention Greece, where there was a vibrant Sephardic community in Salonika Chirac has publicly admitted France’s guilt for that now no longer exists. these crimes. The war record of the Netherlands is hardly better; Dutch police And let us give credit where credit is due. Of officers, civil servants, railway personnel and all the “European” states, perhaps Turkey other collaborators made a substantial performed the best. It provided sanctuary for contribution to the destruction of the Jewish Jews from around the continent (including my community in a country that has long own relatives, who fled Berlin in the late 1930s). enjoyed such a strong – albeit false – image It is worth reminding those who argue that of staunch resistance. Turkey is not European enough to join the European Union of this noble time in its past. In eastern Europe, the Baltic states and Turkey’s problem is with another Holocaust that in the regions under Soviet rule, notably it would like to forget. Ukraine, the local populations played a But the Dutch and the Poles and the French significant part in the Final Solution. Anti- and the Ukrainians and the Austrians and all semitism in those regions was as, if not the others in Europe, who stood by while Jews more, endemic as in Germany. Many saw the were rounded up for the extermination camps, Nazis as allies against Soviet communism, did not collectively plan or implement the and after their invasion by Germany, “final solution”. They joined in the thousands of Lithuanians, Latvians and persecution, but they did not carry out the Estonians volunteered for the notorious extermination. Pijpers says we need to ascribe police battalions and auxiliary forces that guilt, and I agree with that. But it is important then launched pogroms on a massive scale. to recognise degrees of guilt. Autumn 2006 Europe’s World | 125 In other eastern European countries the republics. After the collapse of the Soviet picture is equally terrifying. In Hungary empire, most of the new Eastern European hundreds of thousands of Jews were regimes more or less accounted for earlier deported by the SS during the closing phase war crimes, but compared to the West of the war, with the full support of the German Vergangenheitsbewältigung they Hungarian government and the notorious only did so scantily. Arrow Cross militias. The latter proceeded to massacre their Jewish countrymen in great The second argument for a different numbers. In Romania, a similar role was approach to commemoration of the played by the Iron Guard under the command holocaust relates to the whole process of of the pro-German dictator Ion Antonescu. European integration. Germany has, over the Even before the Germans stepped in, years, become one of the most “European” of Antonescu had already slaughtered a quarter the EU member states, in terms of economic of a million Romanian Jews. The Romanian interdependence, political affiliation and fascists also often operated outside their own support for the EU institutions. According to borders, as did their Austrian, Baltic and the EU treaties, German citizens are also Ukrainian comrades. In February 1941, for European citizens, and as such completely instance, some 30,000 Jewish citizens were equal to their French, Polish, Danish, or killed in Odessa by Romanian troops. Belgian brethren. Germany not only shares sovereignty with Europe but also citizenship. Bulgaria and Slovakia were also pro- So why not also share its memory of the past German satellites during World War II, too, without violating the historical facts? although surprisingly the Bulgarians managed to limit the scale of the The notion of European citizenship has so persecutions. This cannot be said of the far been mainly associated with the free notorious Ustashe fascists in Croatia, which movement of people across national borders, like Bulgaria, is now a candidate for EU and with the fundamental rights listed in the membership. The Ustashe slaughtered with European constitution. But these rights are in their own hands nearly 40,000 Jewish fellow any case available under the various national citizens as well as Roma gypsies. Even the constitutions, and have not added much Nazis were at times dumbfounded by the value, so European citizenship still lacks the cruelty and the fanaticism of their Croat, feeling of belonging to a true political Lithuanian or Romanian sympathisers. community, with common roots in the past. A collective awareness of the holocaust and the Until 1989 and the fall of the Berlin Wall, shared responsibility of most EU member communist rule in those countries had to a states, would surely contribute to developing large extent obscured these national a more substantial European identity, as well contributions to the holocaust. Hitler’s perhaps to relieving the conscience of fascism was generally deemed responsible, younger generations of Germans. and the post-war communist takeovers had cleared things up in that respect – that at It is very welcome therefore that the least was the reasoning in the peoples’ European Parliament and the European 126 | Europe’s World Autumn 2006 Commission are both beginning to see the collective European memory of the World War II, COMMENTARY William Schabas and of the holocaust, as the building blocks of European citizenship. Slovakia’s Commissioner Jan Figel suggested at the time of the 2005 There are two important distinctions. First, launch of the Consultation Forum on the accomplices in crime do not generally deserve the Future Programme for Active European same reprobation as the perpetrators. As recently Citizenship (2007-2013) that “public acts of as 2004, the Appeals Chamber of the International remembrance [of Auschwitz] may indeed help Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia reduced the sentence of one of the Serb commanders at to determine an always fragile yet evolving Srebrenica, General Radislav Krstic. The trial judges collective memory, capable of contributing to had convicted him of genocide, but the appeal the expression and sentiment of a European judges said he was only an accomplice.
Recommended publications
  • GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, and the RECONSTRUCTION of CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented In
    NEW CITIZENS: GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alison Clark Efford, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Doctoral Examination Committee: Professor John L. Brooke, Adviser Approved by Professor Mitchell Snay ____________________________ Adviser Professor Michael L. Benedict Department of History Graduate Program Professor Kevin Boyle ABSTRACT This work explores how German immigrants influenced the reshaping of American citizenship following the Civil War and emancipation. It takes a new approach to old questions: How did African American men achieve citizenship rights under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments? Why were those rights only inconsistently protected for over a century? German Americans had a distinctive effect on the outcome of Reconstruction because they contributed a significant number of votes to the ruling Republican Party, they remained sensitive to European events, and most of all, they were acutely conscious of their own status as new American citizens. Drawing on the rich yet largely untapped supply of German-language periodicals and correspondence in Missouri, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., I recover the debate over citizenship within the German-American public sphere and evaluate its national ramifications. Partisan, religious, and class differences colored how immigrants approached African American rights. Yet for all the divisions among German Americans, their collective response to the Revolutions of 1848 and the Franco-Prussian War and German unification in 1870 and 1871 left its mark on the opportunities and disappointments of Reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • ICC-01/18 Date: 16 March 2020 PRE
    ICC-01/18-111 17-03-2020 1/10 NM PT Original: English No.: ICC-01/18 Date: 16 March 2020 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou SITUATION IN THE STATE OF PALESTINE Public Amicus Curiae Submission of Observations Pursuant to Rule 103 Source: Intellectum Scientific Society (hereinafter Intellectum) No. ICC-01/18 1/10 ICC-01/18-111 17-03-2020 2/10 NM PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor James Stewart, Deputy Prosecutor Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence Paolina Massidda States’ Representatives Amici Curiae The competent authorities of the ▪ Professor John Quigley State of Palestine ▪ Guernica 37 International Justice The competent authorities of the Chambers State of Israel ▪ The European Centre for Law and Justice ▪ Professor Hatem Bazian ▪ The Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust ▪ The Czech Republic ▪ The Israel Bar Association ▪ Professor Richard Falk ▪ The Organization of Islamic Cooperation ▪ The Lawfare Project, the Institute for NGO Research, Palestinian Media Watch, & the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ▪ MyAQSA ▪ Professor Eyal Benvenisti ▪ The Federal Republic of Germany ▪ Australia No. ICC-01/18 2/10 ICC-01/18-111 17-03-2020 3/10 NM PT ▪ UK Lawyers for Israel, B’nai B’rith UK, the International Legal Forum, the Jerusalem Initiative and the Simon Wiesenthal Centre ▪ The Palestinian Bar Association ▪ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Retroactive Application of the Genocide Convention William A
    University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 4 Article 4 Issue 2 Spring 2010 Retroactive Application of the Genocide Convention William A. Schabas Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.stthomas.edu/ustjlpp Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Bluebook Citation William A. Schabas, Retroactive Application of the Genocide Convention, 4 U. St. Thomas J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 36 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UST Research Online and the University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy. For more information, please contact Editor-in-Chief Patrick O'Neill. RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF THE GENOCIDE CONVENTION WILLIAM A. SCHABAS* THE CONVENTION FOR THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE was adopted on December 9, 1948,' and entered into force on January 11, 1951 2 It defines the crime of genocide and sets out various norms governing its punishment, as well as establishing the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in the matter of disputes about its interpretation and application. Its obligations essentially concern issues of criminal liability for the crime. Nevertheless, in the recent case between Bosnia and Serbia, the International Court held that it could make a finding that a State had either committed genocide or failed to prevent it.3 This might, as a result, lead to a finding that some form of just compensation would be due, although in the specifics of that case the Court declined to make such a finding. The Genocide Convention was drafted by the United Nations General Assembly pursuant to Resolution 96(I), which was adopted two years earlier on December 11, 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • Diese PDF-Datei Herunterladen
    historia scribere 08 (2016) „Walliser off Gultüre.“ Die Wanderungsbewegung der Walser und Galtür Jakob Kathrein Kerngebiet: Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte eingereicht bei: ao. Univ.-Prof.in Dr.in Elisabeth Dietrich-Daum eingereicht im Semester: SS 2014 Rubrik: BA-Arbeit Abstract „Walliser off Gultüre.“ The Walser migration movement and Galtür This bachelor thesis focusses on the history of the Walser migration in general and the settlement of Galtür in particular, looking at the reasons why the Walser people left their homeland and at the conditions of establishing new settlements. In addition, this paper tries to find out whether traces of the Walser people and their culture still exist, particularly with reference to Galtür. Does a commemorative culture in the centres of the Walser migration and settlement exist in today’s Galtür? Do people there identify themselves as Walsers? Einleitung „Alle drei Jahre trifft sich die große Walser-Familie, blickt auf die gemeinsame fas- zinierende Geschichte zurück, tauscht sich über Gemeinsamkeiten und Unter- schiede aus, macht die Tradition im Sprechen der Walserdialekte und dem Tra- gen der Trachten erlebbar, pflegt und knüpft bewusst Walserfreundschaften.“1 Dieser Auszug aus dem Vorwort des Programmhefts des „Walsertreffens“ vom Septem- ber 2013 verdeutlicht die Aktualität der Walser2 und ihrer Kultur. Seit 1962 kommen alle drei Jahre an die dreitausend Menschen abwechselnd in einem der zahlreichen Wal- 1 Programmheft Walsertreffen 2013, Vorwort, [http://www.walsertal.at/Walsertreffen%202013], eingesehen 9.4.2014. 2 Der Terminus „Walser“ wird in dieser Arbeit als ein aus den Quellen und der Literatur abgeleiteter, historischer Begriff verwendet und fungiert dabei als Sammelbegriff für Frauen, Männer und Kinder gleichermaßen.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory
    To Our Dead: Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory by Jeffrey P. Luppes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Germanic Languages and Literatures) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Andrei S. Markovits, Chair Professor Geoff Eley Associate Professor Julia C. Hell Associate Professor Johannes von Moltke © Jeffrey P. Luppes 2010 To My Parents ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a dissertation is a long, arduous, and often lonely exercise. Fortunately, I have had unbelievable support from many people. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor and dissertation committee chair, Andrei S. Markovits. Andy has played the largest role in my development as a scholar. In fact, his seminal works on German politics, German history, collective memory, anti-Americanism, and sports influenced me intellectually even before I arrived in Ann Arbor. The opportunity to learn from and work with him was the main reason I wanted to attend the University of Michigan. The decision to come here has paid off immeasurably. Andy has always pushed me to do my best and has been a huge inspiration—both professionally and personally—from the start. His motivational skills and dedication to his students are unmatched. Twice, he gave me the opportunity to assist in the teaching of his very popular undergraduate course on sports and society. He was also always quick to provide recommendation letters and signatures for my many fellowship applications. Most importantly, Andy helped me rethink, re-work, and revise this dissertation at a crucial point.
    [Show full text]
  • From Incitement to Indictment
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 98 Article 4 Issue 3 Spring Spring 2008 From Incitement to Indictment - Prosecuting Iran's President for Advocating Israel's Destruction and Piecing Together Incitement Law's Emerging Analytical Framework Gregory S. Gordon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Gregory S. Gordon, From Incitement to Indictment - Prosecuting Iran's President for Advocating Israel's Destruction and Piecing Together Incitement Law's Emerging Analytical Framework, 98 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 853 (2007-2008) This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4 169/08/9803-0853 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 98, No. 3 Copyright 0 2008 by Northwestern Universily, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. FROM INCITEMENT TO INDICTMENT? PROSECUTING IRAN'S PRESIDENT FOR ADVOCATING ISRAEL'S DESTRUCTION AND PIECING TOGETHER INCITEMENT LAW'S EMERGING ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK GREGORY S. GORDON* Israel must be wiped off the face of the map. -Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Let us consult yet, in this long forewhile How to ourselves we may prevent this ill. 2 ,-Homer On October 25, 2005, at an anti-Zionism conference in Tehran, Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, called for Israel to "be wiped off the face of the map "-thefirst in a series of incendiary speeches arguably advocating liquidation of the Jewish state.
    [Show full text]
  • Referral of Iranian President Ahmadinejad on the Charge of Incitement to Commit Genocide
    REFERRAL OF IRANIAN PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD ON THE CHARGE OF INCITEMENT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE AMB. MEIR ROSENNE PROF. ELIE WIESEL AMB. DORE GOLD IRIT KOHN, ADV. AMB. EYTAN BENTSUR M.K. DAN NAVEH PRINCIPAL AUTHOR: JUSTUS REID WEINER, ESQ. The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ®¯¢Ú© ‰È„Ó ¯Â·Èˆ ÈÈÈÚÏ ÈÓÏ˘Â¯È‰ ÊίӉ Dedicated to the victims of Darfur © 2006 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Tel Hai Street 13, Jerusalem 92107, Israel Tel. 972-2-5619281 Fax. 972-2-5619112 Email: [email protected] Internet website: www.jcpa.org ISBN 965-218-055-6 Production Coordinator: Edna Weinstock-Gabay Graphic Design: Rami & Jacky / Hagar Rivka Moshe Acknowledgements The principal author wishes to thank his colleagues at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, including Diane Morrison (for her legal research), Jeremy Siegman, Jennifer Tullman, and Ilana Hart. Photo Credits Front Cover: AP Photo Back Cover: Ahmadinejad speaks during a conference on Oct. 26, 2005 entitled ‘The World Without Zionism.’ Ahmadinejad states that Israel should be “wiped off the map,” the official IRNA news agency reported. (AP Photo/ISNA) Executive Summary President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of the Islamic verbal barrages, however, pose no existential threat Republic of Iran has made the destruction of Israel to ordinary people in the street. Ahmadinejad’s his avowed policy. Ahamadinejad’s declaration reckless anti-Semitic tirades that “the Jews are in 2005 that “Israel should be wiped off the map” very filthy people,” “[the Jews have] inflicted the was met by widespread international outcry. Yet, most damage on the human race,” “[the Jews are] this declaration was not an isolated incident, but a bunch of bloodthirsty barbarians,” “they should the first of many during the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Country List
    CONTENT LANGUAGE & COUNTRY LIST Languages by countries World map (source: United States. United Nations. [ online] no dated. [cited July 2007] Available from: www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/htmain.htm) Multicultural Clinical Support Resource Language & country list Country Languages (official/national languages in bold) Country Languages (official/national languages in bold) Afghanistan Dari, Pashto, Parsi-Dari, Tatar, Farsi, Hazaragi Brunei Malay, English, Chinese, other minority languages Albania Tosk, Albanian Bulgaria Bulgarian, Turkish, Roma and other minority languages Algeria Arabic, French, Berber dialects Burkina Faso French, native African (Sudanic) languages 90% Andorra Catalán, French, Spanish, Portuguese Burundi Kirundi, French, Swahili, Rwanda Angola Portuguese, Koongo, Mbundu, Chokwe, Mbunda, Cambodia Khmer, French, English Antigua and English, local dialects, Arabic, Portuguese Cameroon French, English, 24 African language groups Barbuda Canada English, French, other minority languages Argentina Spanish, English, Italian, German, French Cape Verde Portuguese, Kabuverdianu, Criuolo Armenia Armenian, Yezidi, Russian Central French (official), Sangho (lingua franca, national), other minority Australia English, Indigenous and other minority languages African languages Austria German, Slovenian, Croatian, Hungarian, Republic Alemannisch, Bavarian, Sinte Romani, Walser Chad French, Arabic, Sara, more than 120 languages and dialects Azerbaijan Azerbaijani (Azeri), Russian, Armenian, other and minority languages Chile
    [Show full text]
  • Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe Symposium Presentations W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Forced and Slave Labor in Nazi-Dominated Europe Symposium Presentations CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2004 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. First printing, April 2004 Copyright © 2004 by Peter Hayes, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Michael Thad Allen, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Paul Jaskot, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Wolf Gruner, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Randolph L. Braham, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Christopher R. Browning, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by William Rosenzweig, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Andrej Angrick, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Sarah B. Farmer, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2004 by Rolf Keller, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Belonging in German Diasporic Communities Around 1900
    »The German likes quarrelling.« Conflict and belonging in German diasporic communities around 1900 Abstract Discourses of inclusion and exclusion were an integral part of German nation building after 1871. The paper shows that they were not confined to the metropole but were, in fact, reciprocated abroad. Selected instances of conflict within German migrant communities around the world are taken as a springboard to analyze public contestations of (trans-)national belonging. The sources abound with gossip, aggressive bickering, and official complaints to authorities. Contentious issues cover the areas of politics, religion, class, and language. The case studies engage critically with a number of wider issues. First, they question contemporaneous interpretations of an Imperial diaspora as a unified and Heimat-oriented block. Second, on a theoretical level the article argues that internal ruptures are constitutive elements of diaspora construction and should be considered in concomitant theorizations. Third, the case studies highlight the close connection between diaspora and nation building. Fourth, the discourses studied did not only take place within communities, but also between them, as well as with the metropole, all in multi-directional ways. Questions of belonging were discussed around the world with strikingly similar arguments and terminology. Globalization was at work at the discourse level. Introduction Nation-building processes always go hand in hand with discourses of inclusion and exclusion. Germany after 1871 was no exception. Socialists, Catholics and Jews all experienced some kind of marginalization, and pertinent public discourses were largely male dominated. Yet another platform to discuss issues of national belonging and ›not-belonging‹ were German emigrants. In the course of the nineteenth century, the term Auswanderer (emigrants) was increasingly replaced by the term Auslandsdeutsche (Germans abroad), denoting persisting ties with the metropole despite residence abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Public: Jews in Baden and Hannover and Their Role in the German Press, 18151848
    BECOMING PUBLIC: JEWS IN BADEN AND HANNOVER AND THEIR ROLE IN THE GERMAN PRESS, 1815-1848 by DAVID ANDREW MEOLA B.Sc., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2000 M.A., University of British Columbia, 2007 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2012 © David Andrew Meola, 2012 Abstract This dissertation proposes the necessity of using local German newspapers as a valuable source for evaluating German Jewish publicness during the Restoration (1815-30) and Vormärz (1830- 48) eras. It focuses on both the quotidian and extraordinary uses of the local press to achieve Jewish objectives. The dissertation proposes a re-evaluation of Jürgen Habermas’ Öffentlichkeitstheorie (publicness theory) by seeking to further spatialize the public sphere through the lens of local newspapers in the German states during the Restoration and Vormärz . Integrating spatial theory with theoretical perspectives about the public sphere, this project argues that newspapers became both places and spaces of German Jewish publicness. They were places that became familiar through extensive use, and spaces that became locations of freedom for German Jews and thus helped to destabilize the status quo—including prior definitions of Jewishness and Judaism. These local and public places and spaces became as important for the process of Jewish emancipation as the internal German Jewish press. By concentrating their efforts on the local level, Jews in Baden and Hannover, when allowed to participate in local newspapers, played an important part in creating the narrative about their own lives, helped facilitate their own emancipation, and showed they were actually equal to other Germans despite their political inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty and Drug Offences Professor William Schabas Irish Centre for Human Rights National University of Ireland, Galw
    THE DEATH PENALTY AND DRUG OFFENCES PROFESSOR WILLIAM SCHABAS IRISH CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, GALWAY CHINA, OCTOBER 2010 PAPER PREPARED BY THE IRISH CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND DRUG POLICY This lecture is funded with the support of the European Union The Death Penalty for Drug Offences According to the 2010 United Nations quinquennial report on the status of the death penalty, there are forty-seven countries in the world that retain capital punishment.1 Of this group, thirty2 have legislation prescribing the death penalty for drug-related offences. There are also two additional territories, Taiwan ROC and Palestine, which prescribe the death penalty for drug crimes.3 State practice and legislation vis-à-vis the death penalty for drugs varies enormously between these countries. A number of governments display a deep ambivalence towards capital punishment in general, and towards executing drug offenders specifically; whereas for others the execution of drug offenders forms a routine part of the criminal justice system. Some states pass death sentences fairly regularly, yet in practice executions are rarely or never carried out. Some states are extremely secretive about their capital punishment practices, while others are fairly open and some even enthusiastically publicise the executions of drug offenders. There is also a wide variation in the adherence to fair trial standards from one country to another. Despite varying state practice, hundreds of people are executed for drug offences each year around the world, a figure that very likely exceeds one thousand when taking into account those countries that keep their death penalty statistics secret.
    [Show full text]