DOCSLIB.ORG

Romanian Banat, 1918–1935

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SCHWABEN, BANATER, DEUTSCHE: FORMULATING GERMANNESS IN THE GREATER ROMANIAN BANAT, 1918–1935 By Christopher Wendt Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Balázs Trencsényi Second Reader: Jan Hennings CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 Abstract In this thesis I examine the process by which leaders of an ethnic German minority community, the Banat Swabians, came to promote different conceptions of “Germanness” during the interwar period in the state of Greater Romania. I ask how Swabian leaders conceived of and transmitted conceptions of belonging and affiliation to the wider German-speaking community from the last days of the First World War, when the Banat became dislodged from Austria-Hungary, until 1935, when the local German-Swabian political leadership was incorporated into the newly transformed National Socialist umbrella organization of ethnic Germans in Romania. Using a source base primarily composed of local press and contemporary publications, I examine the fluctuation between consensus and disagreement over what “being German” in the Banat meant, and how different components—a connection to a wider German cultural community, Catholic faith, regional rootedness, and ethnicity—were often emphasized to different degrees, at different times, by different groups. The argument that I ultimately advance regarding the form of “Germanness promoted by Swabian leaders in the Banat rests on a perceived link between “the political” and “the cultural.” Driven by political necessity, Swabian leaders—many of whom before the war had bought into the Hungarian nation-state project—quickly came to espouse a Germanness rooted in an ethno-cultural sense. Through the process of mediating the accompanying cultural image of the German Banat Swabian to the wider community through the 1920s, I argue that an exclusivist discourse on Banat Germanness was established that paved the way for more extreme political demands and calls for radical social reorganization in the 1930s. CEU eTD Collection ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank all of you who have helped me over these last two years in Budapest. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors, Balázs Trencsényi, and my second reader, Jan Hennings, for the attention and interest you have both shown in my work, and in helping me to move my project along. I am of course indebted to all of the Mitarbeiter at the Institut für donauschwäbische Geschichte und Landeskunde in Tübingen, Germany, at which I was graciously supported while carrying out research. My special thanks goes to Dr. Matthias Beer for the time he granted me to discuss my own work. Of course, I have to thank my fellow classmates and colleagues for their support and kindness— especially over the last couple of weeks of writing. James, Frederik, and Gabi, I am especially indebted to all of you. Lastly, I would be nowhere without my parents. I thank you for all the support, both moral and material, that you continue to provide me with. CEU eTD Collection iii Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Locating the Banat: Between Historical Reality and Contemporary Myth ................................ 8 The Swabian Migrations: A Habsburg Colonial Experiment ................................................... 11 Southern Hungarian Swabians between Ungarndeutsch and Deutsch-ungarisch .................... 13 Zusammenbruch: The Transition from Empire to Nation-State ............................................... 15 Defining “Germanness” ............................................................................................................ 18 Interrogating Self-Representation, Seeking Identity ................................................................. 20 Working in Tandem: Politics and Culture Shaping Germanness ............................................. 22 Chapter One: Shaken Foundations, New Possibilities: Delineating Germanness in a Banat Between Hungary, Serbia, and Romania, 1918–1921 .............................................................. 26 Ceasefire: Temesvár between Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest, and Paris ................................ 31 Early Swabian Reactions .......................................................................................................... 35 “Moderates” and “Radicals” ..................................................................................................... 39 Practical Politics: Shifting Allegiances Within the Romanian Banat ....................................... 49 Conclusions: A United Volksgemeinschaft? ............................................................................ 53 Chapter Two: From Finding the Heimat to “New ways and New Methods”: Minority- Making and Political Dissatisfaction, 1923–1930 ..................................................................... 57 The Politics of Culture in Romania .......................................................................................... 60 Minority-Making: The 200-Year Jubilee in Timișoara ............................................................ 63 Writing the (German) Banat Swabian Heimat .......................................................................... 73 Dissatisfaction, Disappointment, Radicalization ...................................................................... 79 A Critique from the Margins: The Lugoscher Zeitung ............................................................. 81 “New Methods and New Ways” ............................................................................................... 83 Conclusions: A Defunct Volksgemeinschaft? ........................................................................... 88 Chapter Three: German Renewal ............................................................................................. 90 National Socialism in Romania: Self-Help and the Renewal Movement ................................. 93 The Schwäbischer Volkskalender: Delivering Germanness to the Banat ................................. 96 Cultural Acquiescence .............................................................................................................. 99 CEU eTD Collection Conclusions: A True Volksgemeinschaft? .............................................................................. 102 Conclusion: A growing Volk, a narrowing Germanness ............................................................ 104 Bibliography .............................................................................................................................. 107 iv Introduction In late April of 1916, as the First World War grinded forward on all fronts, Adam Müller- Guttenbrunn, a native of then-Southern Hungarian Banat, composed an agitated letter to Josef Geml, the mayor of Temesvár (Timișoara),1 the unofficial capital of the region. Writing from Habsburg Vienna, Müller-Guttenbrunn, who had already achieved renown as one of the most popular German-language authors and personalities of the Banat, expressed his extreme displeasure over a meeting between Geml and Field Marshal von Mackensen, the commander of the German army operating in Southern Hungary. As it came out in a later letter from Müller- Guttenbrunn, the initial meeting had taken place after the German general had heard of a song sung by Hungarian soldiers, “Mégis hunczut a német,” that disparaged their German allies, and as a result he wanted to have an assessment of the “situation of Germandom” (Lage des Deutschtums) in the Banat.2 In his letter, the writer chastised the mayor for his weak presentation of German national spirit in the region—“Did you have any idea how painful it must have been for the current leader of the German army to realize that those [Banat] Germans are in great danger of losing their nationality…?”—and for presenting the great disparity between the high number Transylvanian Saxon German-language institutions and the lack of such for Banat Swabians as natural and according to law.3 Bemoaning all of the Swabian children who, through the pull of social advancement would pay the “price of their nationality” and join a Hungarian “nation of eight million” instead of a German of “hundred-million nation” CEU eTD Collection 1 In the narrative, I will mostly refer to places by the names used by the governing administrations at the time I am referring to, while providing alternative names in parentheses. 2 Adam Müller-Guttenbrunn, “Ein unhöflicher Breifwechsel,” in Deutsche Sorgen in Ungarn. Studien und Bekenntnisse (Vienna: Ed. Strache, 1918), 155. 3 Ibid., “Ist Ihnen keine Ahnung davon aufgegangen, welch ein Schmerz es für den Führer der heutigen deutschen Armee sein mußte, zu erkennen, daß jene Deutschen in Gefahr schweben, ihre Nationalität Einzüßen.” All translations are my own. For longer passages, I will include the original German in the footnotes. 1 (Hundermillionenvolk), Müller-Guttenbrunn called out Geml, himself a Swabian, for his apparent embarrassment over his own Swabian heritage. Lastly, in a parting shot, Müller- Guttenbrunn added that from what he had heard, General von Mackensen had been none too convinced of Geml’s explanations for the apparent lack of a German consciousness. In his response to the writer (published by Müller-Guttenbrunn), Geml showed himself to be unbowed by the harsh criticism of his countryman.
Recommended publications
  • World Directory of Minorities

    World Directory of Minorities

    World Directory of Minorities Europe MRG Directory –> Russian Federation –> Russian or Volga Germans Print Page Close Window Russian or Volga Germans Profile According to the 2002 national census, there are 597,212 Russian or Volga Germans in the Russian Federation. Volga Germans are primarily Lutheran and Mennonite in religion. Their number has fallen by almost half since 1989, as many have taken advantage of naturalization opportunities in Germany. Historical context Large-scale German settlement in Russia first occurred in the sixteenth century following Catherine the Great's decree of 1763 granting steppe land along the Volga River to Germans. In 1924 the Soviet regime created the Volga German ASSR with German as its official language. The republic was disbanded during the war and its German population (895,637) deported to Siberia and Central Asia. The Germans were not allowed to resettle in the region despite being rehabilitated in 1965. They settled instead in Siberia, the Ural mountains and the republics of Central Asia, especially Kazakhstan. From the late 1980s, a number of German organizations were established: Revival (Wiedergeburt, Vozrozhdenie); Freedom (Freiheit, Svoboda); and the Interstate Organization of Russian Germans (Zwischenstaathischer Verein der Russlanddeutschen). These organizations have campaigned for the restoration of their homeland but have faced strong opposition from the local populations of the Saratov and Volgograd oblasts. The German Government has allocated significant funds for the creation of German cultural centres and schools in Central Asia and Russia. This has not, however, deterred hundreds of thousands of Germans from emigrating to Germany. Ethnic Germans, their spouses and their descendants have been able to naturalize as German citizens through the Law of Return, in spite of often lacking even rudimentary knowledge of the German language.
  • Judeţul Timiş

    Judeţul Timiş

    JUDEŢUL TIMIŞ Circumscripţia Judecătoriei TIMIŞOARA Nr.crt. Denumirea biroului notarial Sediul Orarul Numele şi prenumele notarului public 1. S.P.N. Ana BOAR si Flavius Alexandru BOAR Timișoara LU – VI 9 – 17 BOAR ANA 2. B.N.P.A. CIMPOEŞU S.P.N. Timișoara LU – VI 830 – 1430 3. CIMPOEŞU MIHAI FLORIN 4. CIMPOEŞU SIMONA ALINA ȘERBAN ELENA GABRIELA 5. S.P.N. CIORÎCĂ MARIN EUGEN – MAGHIARU ANA Timișoara LU – JO 9 – 1630 6. ADRIANA VI 9 – 15 CIORÎCĂ MARIN EUGEN MAGHIARU ANA ADRIANA 7. S.P.N. CINCA – ȘTEFĂNIGĂ Timișoara LU – VI 9 – 17 8. CINCA NICOLAE REMUS ȘTEFĂNIGĂ MARINELA 9. S.P.N. COJOCARI – MELCIU Timișoara LU – VI 830 – 1630 10. COJCARI PAULA OANA MELCIU IONUȚ ALEXANDRU 11. S.P.N. CRISTESCU – HEIMAN Timișoara LU – VI 9 – 1630 12. CRISTESCU VLAD HEIMAN ANITA 13. S.P.N. DIGNITAS Timisoara LU – JO 9 – 15 14. CRISTE SAFTA VI 9 – 13 MANDA DANIELA 15. S.P.N. NOTAVILLE Timișoara LU – JO 9 – 17 16. COSNEANU RODICA VI 9 – 15 17. ŢĂRAN CĂTĂLINA RODICA 18. LUPU OANA RALUCA Recaș MA 9 – 14 MUNTEAN ALEXANDRA COSMINA MI 9 – 17 19. S.P.N. DĂNILĂ ȘI ASOCIAȚII Timișoara LU – JO 830 – 15 20. DĂNILĂ EUSEBIU-OCTAV VI 830 - 14 DĂNILĂ MIRCEA-LIVIU Satchinez LU – JO 9 – 15 VI 9 – 14 21. S.P.N. DOROŞ – GOLBAN-CURUŢI Timișoara 22. DOROŞ ADELA ANA LU – VI 9 – 15 23. GOLBAN-CURUŢI MARIANA DOROȘ ALEXANDRU VICTOR 24. S.P.N. INCZE EDIT – INCZE TIMEA Timișoara LU – VI 8 – 15 25. INCZE EDIT INCZE TIMEA 26. S.P.N.
  • 1 the Early and Middle Bronze Age in the Balkans Arthur Bankoff

    1 the Early and Middle Bronze Age in the Balkans Arthur Bankoff

    1 The Early and Middle Bronze Age in the Balkans Arthur Bankoff The earlier part of the Bronze Age in temperate southeastern Europe (c. 2200– 1500 B.C.) presents a confusing picture to the unwary archaeologist. Although over the years more publications have appeared in English, German, and French, many basic site reports and syntheses are only fully available in Hungarian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Serbian, or other indigenous languages. Often the names of apparently identical archaeological cultures change with bewildering abandon as one crosses modern national borders or even moves between regions of the same country. This part of the world has a history (beginning in the mid–nineteenth century) of antiquarian collecting and detailed specialist typological studies, especially of ceramics and metal objects, with far less effort expended on the more mundane aspects of prehistoric life. Only since the 1980s have studies become available that incorporate the analysis of plant and animal material from Bronze Age sites, and these are far from the rule. To some extent, this is due to the nature of the archaeological record, that is, the sites and material that have survived from the Early and Middle Bronze Age. With the exception of habitation mounds (tells) and burial mounds (tumuli), both of which have a limited distribution in the earlier part of the Bronze Age, most sites are shallow, close to the modern ground surface, and easily disturbed. Farming and urban development has been more destructive to these sites than to the more deeply buried sites of earlier periods. The typically more dispersed settlement pattern of the Bronze Age in most of this region results in smaller sites, more vulnerable to the vagaries of history than the more concentrated nucleated sites of the later Neolithic or Eneolithic (sometimes called Copper Age) of the fifth and fourth millennia B.C.
  • European Influences in Moldova Page 2

    European Influences in Moldova Page 2

    Master Thesis Human Geography Name : Marieke van Seeters Specialization : Europe; Borders, Governance and Identities University : Radboud University, Nijmegen Supervisor : Dr. M.M.E.M. Rutten Date : March 2010, Nijmegen Marieke van Seeters European influences in Moldova Page 2 Summary The past decades the European continent faced several major changes. Geographical changes but also political, economical and social-cultural shifts. One of the most debated topics is the European Union and its impact on and outside the continent. This thesis is about the external influence of the EU, on one of the countries which borders the EU directly; Moldova. Before its independency from the Soviet Union in 1991, it never existed as a sovereign state. Moldova was one of the countries which were carved out of history by the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact in 1940 as it became a Soviet State. The Soviet ideology was based on the creation of a separate Moldovan republic formed by an artificial Moldovan nation. Although the territory of the Moldovan Soviet Socialist Republic was a former part of the Romanian province Bessarabia, the Soviets emphasized the unique and distinct culture of the Moldovans. To underline this uniqueness they changed the Moldovan writing from Latin to Cyrillic to make Moldovans more distinct from Romanians. When Moldova became independent in 1991, the country struggled with questions about its national identity, including its continued existence as a separate nation. In the 1990s some Moldovan politicians focussed on the option of reintegration in a Greater Romania. However this did not work out as expected, or at least hoped for, because the many years under Soviet rule and delinkage from Romania had changed Moldovan society deeply.
  • British Clandestine Activities in Romania During the Second World

    British Clandestine Activities in Romania During the Second World

    British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War This page intentionally left blank British Clandestine Activities in Romania during the Second World War Dennis Deletant Visiting ‘Ion Ra¸tiu’ Professor of Romanian Studies, Georgetown University, USA © Dennis Deletant 2016 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2016 978–1–137–57451–0 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2016 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries.
  • Geographical and Economic Influences on the Colonisation of the Banat

    Geographical and Economic Influences on the Colonisation of the Banat

    Geographica Pannonica No. 2, 20-25 (1998) Geographical and Economic Influences on the Colonisation of the Banat Bruce Mitchell School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU, Englad Saša Kicošev Institute of Geography, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Yugoslavia Abstract In the following paper, the influence of selected factors on the developing settlement of the Banat is examined. These include the historical river network and marshes, the availability of building materials, fuel and drinking water, and the variety, location and extractability of raw materials. Mention is also made of the effect of some of these factors on the general state of health of the population. This is followed by a brief account of processes of colonisation in the Banat during the 18th and 19th centuries. The motivations of the colonists themselves, and of their rulers, the context in which they were operating, and a brief appreciation of the contributions of the various ethnic groups involved. Bounds and Area The Banat is a conventional label for a territorial entity whose existence, despite a remarkably chequered administrative history, is acknowledged by Serb, Romanian, German and Hungarian, and there is close agreement on its geographical bounds. The courses of the Danube, Tisa and Maros embrace the Banat on three sides: divided from the Bačka on the west by the southward flow of the Tisa (Hungarian, Tisza), the Banat is separated "naturally" from Srem and Serbia, and Wallachia by the broad stripe of the Danube as far as Orsova.
  • Holocaust/Shoah the Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-Day Poland

    Holocaust/Shoah the Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-Day Poland

    NOW AVAILABLE remembrance a n d s o l i d a r i t y Holocaust/Shoah The Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-day Poland in 20 th century european history Ways of Survival as Revealed in the Files EUROPEAN REMEMBRANCE of the Ghetto Courts and Police in Lithuania – LECTURES, DISCUSSIONS, remembrance COMMENTARIES, 2012–16 and solidarity in 20 th This publication features the century most significant texts from the european annual European Remembrance history Symposium (2012–16) – one of the main events organized by the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity in Gdańsk, Berlin, Prague, Vienna and Budapest. The 2017 issue symposium entitled ‘Violence in number the 20th-century European history: educating, commemorating, 5 – december documenting’ will take place in Brussels. Lectures presented there will be included in the next Studies issue. 2016 Read Remembrance and Solidarity Studies online: enrs.eu/studies number 5 www.enrs.eu ISSUE NUMBER 5 DECEMBER 2016 REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY EDITED BY Dan Michman and Matthias Weber EDITORIAL BOARD ISSUE EDITORS: Prof. Dan Michman Prof. Matthias Weber EDITORS: Dr Florin Abraham, Romania Dr Árpád Hornják, Hungary Dr Pavol Jakubčin, Slovakia Prof. Padraic Kenney, USA Dr Réka Földváryné Kiss, Hungary Dr Ondrej Krajňák, Slovakia Prof. Róbert Letz, Slovakia Prof. Jan Rydel, Poland Prof. Martin Schulze Wessel, Germany EDITORIAL COORDINATOR: Ewelina Pękała REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY PUBLISHER: European Network Remembrance and Solidarity ul. Wiejska 17/3, 00–480 Warszawa, Poland www.enrs.eu, [email protected] COPY-EDITING AND PROOFREADING: Caroline Brooke Johnson PROOFREADING: Ramon Shindler TYPESETTING: Marcin Kiedio GRAPHIC DESIGN: Katarzyna Erbel COVER DESIGN: © European Network Remembrance and Solidarity 2016 All rights reserved ISSN: 2084–3518 Circulation: 500 copies Funded by the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media upon a Decision of the German Bundestag.
  • LOCALITATE Zo N a Nr. INREG. CUI FIRMA ADRESA OBIECT

    LOCALITATE Zo N a Nr. INREG. CUI FIRMA ADRESA OBIECT

    STARE OBIECT PRINCIPAL DE NR LOCALITATE Nr._INREG. CUI FIRMA ADRESA FIRMA (**) SAL. Zona (*) ACTIVITATE Beba Veche J35/1324/200 21489660 AGRISANTI.RO SRL Beba Veche, jud. A 1-0111-Cultivarea cerealelor, 0 2 7 Timis porumbului şi a altor plante n.c.a. Beba Veche J35/3108/201 31029040 ANDREEA & nr 648, Beba A 2-8121-Activităţi generale de 2 2 ALBERT SRL Veche, jud. Timis curăţenie a clădirilor Beba Veche J35/1660/201 27591014 ARDELEAN nr 355, Beba A 2-0145-Creşterea ovinelor şi 2 2 0 CARPINISAN Veche, jud. Timis caprinelor Beba Veche J35/3987/199 7033862 ARRIA SRL nr 562, Beba DL- 2-2893-Fabricarea utilajelor pentru 2 4 Veche, jud. Timis L31 prelucrarea produselor alimentare, băuturilor şi tutunului Beba Veche J35/1050/200 16328609 ASTEN SRL nr 562, Beba A 2-2825-Fabricarea echipamentelor 2 4 Veche, jud. Timis de ventilaţie şi frigorifice, exclusiv a echipamentelor de uz casnic Beba Veche J35/3450/200 22432247 CENTRO ARIETI SRL Beba Veche, jud. L,ITA 1-0122-Creşterea ovinelor, 2 7 Timis caprinelor, cabalinelor, măgarilor, catârilor şi asinilor Beba Veche J35/1335/200 25714536 CRACIUN & TRIF Beba Veche, jud. A 2-0111-Cultivarea cerealelor 6 9 AGROMEC SRL Timis (exclusiv orez), plantelor 2 leguminoase şi a plantelor producătoare de seminţe oleaginoase Beba Veche F35/379/2013 31368763 CRĂCIUN MEDA nr 697, Beba A 2-0113-Cultivarea legumelor şi a 2 ÎNTREPRINDERE Veche, jud. Timis pepenilor, a rădăcinoaselor şi INDIVIDUALĂ tuberculilor Beba Veche J35/608/2007 21053997 DENI ŞI SUZI SRL nr 241, Beba ITA 2-4711-Comerţ cu amănuntul în Veche, jud.
  • Hungarian Monarchy. Case Study

    Hungarian Monarchy. Case Study

    Nationalism, national movements and the dissolution of the Austro -Hungarian Monarchy. Case study: the activity and discourse of the Romanian National Party of Transylvania 1900-1914 By Szele Aron -Central European University- 2008 CEU eTD Collection 1 Introduction The subject chosen for research has had a turbulent historiographical past, and can be considered quite controversial, in more ways than one. Interpretative strategies of different nationality and political affiliation went abou t rendering the Romanian political elite of Transylvania in altogether dissimilar fashion. But most agree that their special brand of regionally developed nationalism and political activism were paramount in the developments which took place and reverberat ed into Hungarian and Romanian history. This generation of politicians was instrumental in the development of a discourse of contestation towards the centre, based on mass politics and territorial nationalism 1. This dissertation will focus on showing how T ransylvanian Romanian nationalism and national-political elite diachronically altered its discourse, spawning, from the same root, ideologies that ranged from dynastic loyalty, to democracy and populist nationalism. The rendition of the Romanian national movement of Transylvania during its activist phase by Romanian historiography has been plagued by inconsistencies. The official account on the events which ingrained itself after the war in the collective mindset of Romanian historiography was one of unbr idled triumphalism, and a vision of solidarity was projected onto the movement on all levels. This interpretation was to be CEU eTD Collection perpetuated by the post-1945 history-writing, with a single, but paradigmatic twist: it gradually phased out the subject. Works such as the would-be magnum opus of 1 Carl E.
  • Modeling Soil Erosion by Water on Agricultural Land in Cenei, Timiş County, Romania

    Modeling Soil Erosion by Water on Agricultural Land in Cenei, Timiş County, Romania

    Advances in Environmental Development, Geomatics Engineering and Tourism Modeling soil erosion by water on agricultural land in Cenei, Timiş County, Romania GEORGE NARCIS PELEA, IOANA ALINA COSTESCU, ERIKA BEILICCI, TEODOR EUGEN MAN, ROBERT BEILICCI Faculty of Civil Engineering, Hydrotehnical Engineering Department University Politehnica of Timişoara G. Enescu Street No. 1A 300022 Timişoara, Timiş County ROMANIA [email protected] http://www.upt.ro Abstract: This paper aims to present soil erosion by water on agricultural land with low slope up to 5%. In the study were analyzedthe agricultural land of Cenei, in Timiş County, Romania, on part of drainage systems Răuţi – Sânmihaiu German and Checea – Jimbolia, and on the course section of river BegaVeche. The model analyzes soil erosion by water and sediment transport on the main drainage channels and the course section of river BegaVeche. Key-Words:soil erosion by water, sediment transport, drainage system, earth channels,hydrographic area, low slope erosion. 1 Introduction In order to evaluate the soil erosion by water on the Through the water cycle in nature appears the studied surface due to the small slope of phenomenon of soil erosionby water on agricultural surface,which is up to 5%., for the analysis was used land. This phenomenon affects the condition of the a modelling program -WEPP (Water Erosion drainage systems by clogging the channels section. Prediction Project) [5] Due to this problem it is brought to discussion the WEPP is software for the prediction of erosion possibility of analysis of soil erosionby water on processes in watersheds, developed by USDA agricultural land with small slopes.
  • View a Copy of This License, Visit Or Send a Letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA

    View a Copy of This License, Visit Or Send a Letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA

    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. German Identity in Hungary from 1526 Nicole Hein GERM 495 Dr. Dailey-O’Cain April 15, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Habsburg-Hungarian Relations 1.1. Linguistic Considerations 1.2. Political Considerations 1.3. Confessional Affiliation 2. Habsburgian Persecution 2.1. Leopold I 2.2. Maria Theresa 2.3. Joseph II 3. The Rise of Nationalism 3.1. Magyarization 3.2. Imagined Communities 3.3. The Austro-Hungarian Compromise 4. Hungary in the Early 20th Century 4.1. The First World War 4.2. The Interwar Period 5. Identity and Belonging in Hungary to the Mid-20th Century 5.1. Economic Status 5.2. Language 5.3. Education 5.4. Religion 6. Hungary During the Second World War 6.1. National Socialism 6.2. The Post-War Period 6.3. The Many Republics 7. German-Hungarian Identity after 1990 7.1. Identity According to Census Data 8. Conclusion Bibliography 1 Seit Stephan hat die deutsche Hand Gar viel gewirkt mit Fleiß Und in dem schönen Ungarland Floß gar viel deutscher Schweiß. Und gegen Feindesübermacht Da brennt auch deutsches Glut Und in der wilden Türkenschlacht Floß auch viel deutsche[s] Blut. - “T.G.S.” In 1526, the Ottomans defeated the Hungarian army at the Battle of Mohács, annexing a large portion of the Hungarian lands and leaving only the northwestern region to its own devices.
  • Raport Beneficiari "Bani De Liceu" 2017-2018 Data: 26/10/2017

    Raport Beneficiari "Bani De Liceu" 2017-2018 Data: 26/10/2017

    ISJ TIMIȘ SITUAȚIA SOLICITANȚILOR BURSEI SOCIALE "BANI DE LICEU" octombrie 2017 Export aplicatie online - Raport beneficiari "Bani de liceu" 2017-2018 Data: 26/10/2017 Nr. Venitul Nr. Media absențe Județul de Numele solicitantului brut Loc. de domiciliu Unitate de învățământ Importat crt. generală nemotiv domiciliu lunar(lei) ate Amariei C Constantin-Razvan- LICEUL TEORETIC 'TRAIAN VUIA' ORAS 1 Cezarel 0.0 7.97 3 PIETROASA TIMIȘ FAGET Nu LICEUL TEORETIC 'TRAIAN VUIA' ORAS 2 Amariei C Daiana-Diana 0.0 7.58 7 PIETROASA TIMIȘ FAGET Nu LICEUL TEORETIC 'TRAIAN VUIA' ORAS 3 Andrasoni N Pavel-Ilie 77.05 7.77 6 POIENI TIMIȘ FAGET Nu COLEGIUL DE SILVICULTURA SI AGRICULTURA 'CASA VERDE' 4 Andronie I George-Marian 130.25 9.41 0 VIAŞU MEHEDINȚI MUN.TIMISOARA Nu LICEUL TEORETIC 'TRAIAN VUIA' ORAS 5 Apostol Alexandru-Cristian 0.0 6.5 20 BUCOVĂŢ TIMIȘ FAGET Nu 6 Ardelean G Gavrilă 0.0 8.57 9 FERENDIA TIMIȘ LICEUL TEORETIC ORAS GATAIA Nu LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC 'CRISTOFOR NAKO' 7 Avram I Ilie 0.0 6.5 2 SARAVALE TIMIȘ ORAS SANNICOLAU MARE Nu LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC SPECIAL 8 Babiuc D Bianca Crina 28.0 8.09 22 RECAŞ TIMIȘ 'GHEORGHE ATANASIU' MUN.TIMISOARA Nu COLEGIUL ECONOMIC 'F.S. NITTI' 9 Bacescu D Liana-Madalina 99.58 9.26 12 TOMNATIC TIMIȘ MUN.TIMISOARA Nu COLEGIUL TEHNIC DE VEST 10 Banias C Roxana 0.0 6.6 8 BRESTOVĂŢ TIMIȘ MUN.TIMISOARA Nu LICEUL TEORETIC 'TRAIAN VUIA' ORAS 11 Barbos P Iosif 120.0 6.09 13 SINTEŞTI TIMIȘ FAGET Nu LICEUL TEORETIC 'TRAIAN VUIA' ORAS 12 Barbos P Maria 120.0 8.6 10 SINTEŞTI TIMIȘ FAGET Nu COLEGIUL NATIONAL 'IULIA HASDEU' 13 Bejera D Andreea 0.0 9.5 5 ŞTIUCA TIMIȘ MUN.LUGOJ Nu COLEGIUL TEHNIC 'VALERIU BRANISTE' 14 Benzar A Adi 0.0 6.7 10 ŞTIUCA TIMIȘ MUN.LUGOJ Nu LICEUL TEORETIC 'TRAIAN VUIA' ORAS 15 Bereznicu G Andrada-Clarisa 110.33 8.31 14 TEMEREŞTI TIMIȘ FAGET Nu COLEGIUL NATIONAL 'IULIA HASDEU' 16 Bilan G Ștefan 75.0 6.55 91 ŞTIUCA TIMIȘ MUN.LUGOJ Nu COLEGIUL TEHNIC 'VALERIU BRANISTE' 17 Bilan I Estera-Bianca 0.0 7.92 6 POGĂNEŞTI TIMIȘ MUN.LUGOJ Nu 1/12 ISJ TIMIȘ SITUAȚIA SOLICITANȚILOR BURSEI SOCIALE "BANI DE LICEU" octombrie 2017 Nr.