Report of the Board of Metropolitan Park Commissioners (1899)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DCR Parking Meter Proposal
DCR Parking Meter Proposal October 14 and 15, 2020 • Two ways to ask questions during the meeting • Raise your hand • Use Q&A feature • You will have the opportunity to submit comments over the course of the next two weeks at: • DCR Public Comments https://www.mass.gov/forms/dcr-public-comments • Via email – [email protected] Please note that this meeting will be recorded; Meeting Logistics the recording will be a public record Commonwealth of Massachusetts Governor Charles D. Baker Lieutenant Governor Karyn E. Polito Energy and Environmental Secretary Kathleen A. Theoharides Department of Conservation and Recreation Commissioner Jim Montgomery • Welcome and Introductions • Project Background • Project Scope and Timeline • Q&A • Closing and Next Steps Agenda DCR manages state parks and oversees more than 450,000 acres throughout Massachusetts. It protects, promotes, and enhances the state’s natural, cultural, and recreational resources. DCR Mission To implement parking strategies on DCR roadways that are consistent with the host municipalities, generating revenue that will aid in all aspects of DCR's mission by supporting staff, materials, and programs without putting additional strain on the commonwealth’s overall budget. DCR Parking Program Objective Economic Stability Customer Centric Environmentally Friendly DCR Parking Philosophy Why Implement Paid On-street Parking? Provides more on-street Consistent parking experience Funds DCR park operations parking for visitors for all parkers Enhances decision- Discourages “vehicle storage” making through data analysis DCR Analysis • Analysis of a DCR curbside parking management program on specific parkways began in 2014 with a Harvard Kennedy School of Government parking revenue study. • The analysis used the existing fee in regulations, $1.25/hour, which is comparable to, or less than, rates charged for on street parking in the respective municipalities. -
Cultural Resources Inventory
Town of Saugus Historical Commission Town Hall 298 Central Street Saugus, MA 01906 CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY Updated: May 2012 The Town of Saugus contains hundreds of sites and structures having architectural, archeological, or historical significance. At the present time, five properties are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, two of which have been designated as National Historic Landmarks (NHL) by the Secretary of the Interior. National Register Properties: Boardman House (NHL, 10/15/1966) Breakheart Reservation Parkways (8/11/2003) Lynn Fells Parkway (5/9/2003) Saugus Iron Works (NHL, 10/15/1966) Saugus Town Hall (6/20/1985) The Commission completed an Inventory of Cultural and Historical Resources in 1986. This inventory was largely confined to resources that were at least 50 years old, and did not include many additional resources reflecting the growth of the Town since World War II. The results of this inventory have been entered into the Massachusetts Historical Commission’s MACRIS database. With a few exceptions, the inventory forms, along with inventory records created by other federal and state agencies, are available for downloading from the MACRIS site (http://mhc-macris.net/). The following listing is in two parts. The first lists properties included in the MACRIS database, while the second shows those properties which the Commission has identified for potential inclusion in the inventory. This includes both older properties not included in the previous inventory and those which have achieved the 50 year age criteria since the initial survey was done. It should be noted that the list of potential additions will expand as individual properties within areas are inventoried or miscellaneous residential properties are identified as being significant either as architecture or association. -
Chestnut Hill Reservation Boston, Massachusetts
Resource Management Plan Chestnut Hill Reservation Boston, Massachusetts November, 2006 Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Planning and Engineering Resource Management Planning Program RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Chestnut Hill Reservation November 2006 Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Karst Hoogeboom Deputy Commissioner, Planning & Engineering Patrice Kish Director, Office of Cultural Resources Leslie Luchonok Director, Resource Management Planning Program Wendy Pearl Project Manager Patrick Flynn Director, Division of Urban Parks and Recreation Peter Church South Region Director Kevin Hollenbeck West District Manager In coordination with: Betsy Shure Gross Director, Office of Public Private Partnerships, Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Marianne Connolly Massachusetts Water Resource Authority Consultant services provided by Pressley Associates, Inc., Landscape Architects Marion Pressley, FASLA Principal Gary Claiborne Project Manager Lauren Meier Landscape Preservation Specialist Jill Sinclair Landscape Historian Swaathi Joseph, LEED AP Landscape Designer LEC, Inc., Environmental Consultants Ocmulgee Associates, Structural Engineering Judith Nitsch Engineers. Inc., Surveyors COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS · EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS Department of Conservation and Recreation Mitt Romney Robert W. Golledge, Jr, Secretary 251 Causeway Street, Suite 600 Governor Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Boston MA 02114-2119 617-626-1250 617-626-1351 Fax Kerry Healey -
Greater Boston Market Viewpoint
GREATER BOSTON MARKET VIEWPOINT 3RD QUARTER 2014 Accelerating success. MARKET VIEWPOINT | Q3 2014 Boston Overview The vacancy rate in the 62.8-million-square-foot Boston office The largest third quarter leases represented Financial District market dropped to 11.1% during the third quarter, and nearly Class A buildings, with select transactions including: 800,000 square feet of positive absorption was recorded. The core Financial District and Back Bay submarkets were largely Tenant Address SF Submarket Financial responsible for the increased occupancy, with 522,000 and Sonos (n) Lafayette City Center 170,000 District 248,000 square feet of absorption, respectively. Financial CDM Smith (n) 75 State Street 170,000 While most of the smaller peripheral submarkets report single- District Financial State Street Bank (r) 100 Summer Street 167,000 digit vacancies, the vacancy rate in the Financial District is 13.1%, District a marked improvement from early 2011 when it topped 20%. Financial Choate Hall & Stewart (c) Two International Place 135,000 District Statistics in the core submarkets are as follows: Financial Jewish Vocational Service 101 Federal Street 42,200 District Supply Market Segment SF Available Vacancy Rate Financial Atlantic Trust 100 Federal Street 40,000 (SF) District Financial District – Class A 27,544,321 3,847,840 14.0% (n) = relocation from Cambridge (c) = contraction (r) = renewal Financial District – Class B 6,054,905 542,551 9.0% Back Bay – Class A 10,863,855 1,131,593 10.4% • The Financial District accounts for a slightly disproportionate Back Bay – Class B 2,030,085 311,428 15.3% share of the leasing activity thus far in 2014, with roughly 60 Seaport – Class A 3,067,295 209,696 6.8% percent of transaction velocity, compared to the Back Bay and Seaport – Class B 4,545,896 343,677 7.6% Seaport at 23 percent and 11 percent, respectively. -
Healey + Mystic
What if Somerville’s Healey School Healey What if Somerville’s and Mystic neighborhoods were reimagined as a single riverfront community? HEALEY + MYSTIC 2 | HEALEY+MYSTIC MASTER PLAN | March 2017 HEALEY MYSTIC MASTER PLAN by Friends of Healey in partnership with the Mystic Learning Center and with support from the City of Somerville through the Community Preservation Act March 2017 Acknowledgements Friends of the Healey Margaret Kurth Abby Luthin Jean Millete Gregory Nadeau Mystic Learning Center Florence “Fluffy” Bergmann City of Somerville Office of the Mayor, Joseph A. Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development Somerville Public Schools, Mary Skipper, Superintendent Arthur D. Healey School, Jill Geiser, Principal Community Preservation Committee • Design Team GroundView Groundwork Somerville Groundwork Lawrence Utile • This master plan process was made possible with funding from the Somerville Community Preservation Act. Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 3 PLANNING PROCESS 6 Vision 72 Community Outreach 10 Current Site 72 Community Participation 12 Ownership 75 Community Workshop Inventory 14 Size 76 Organizing Ideas 16 Site History 78 Design Scenarios 18 Building History 80 Incremental 20 A Topographic and Social Barrier 82 Transformative 84 Community Response CHAPTER 2 ANALYSIS 24 Urban Context CHAPTER 4 THE MASTER PLAN 26 Demographics 90 Large Projects, Design 28 Open Space Need 94 Large Projects, Management 30 City Open Space 96 Small Projects 32 Study Area Open Space 34 Program Providers CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION -
Dedham and Westwood
Towns of Dedham & Westwood Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Plan Funding provided by the Metro Boston Consortium for Sustainable Communities Prepared for Towns of Dedham and Westwood April 2014 Prepared by Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, 6th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Tel (617) 451-2770 www.mapc.org Dedham and Westwood Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Plan Acknowledgements The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under an award with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and findings of the work are dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publication. Such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the federal government. We also thank the Metro Boston Consortium for Sustainable Communities for making this work possible. MAPC would like to thank our project partners from the Towns of Dedham and Westwood for their assistance and input throughout the entirety of this project: Dedham • Virginia LeClair – Environmental Coordinator • Richard McCarthy – Town Planner • Joseph Flanagan – Director, Public Works • Jason Mammone – Town Engineer • Dedham Sustainability Advisory Committee Westwood • Michael Jaillet – Town Administrator • Nora Loughnane – Town Planner • Todd Korchin – Director, Public Works • Westwood Pedestrian and Bike Safety Committee • Westwood Planning Board • Peter Furth and Tom Bertulis – Northeastern University Principal -
Dedham Report
East Dedham Village Charrette Strategic Action Plan December 2013 EAST DEDHAM VILLAGE CHARRETTE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN Planning Team: Metropolitan Area Planning Council Matthew Smith, Senior Regional Planner Steve Winter, Economic Development Manager Marc Draisen, Executive Director Town of Dedham Department of Economic Development Karen O’Connell, Economic Development Director Funding for this project from the Town of Dedham Mitigation Funds and MAPC (from U.S. Economic Development Administration grant funding). East Dedham Village Charrette 2 EAST DEDHAM VILLAGE CHARRETTE Table of Contents STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Existing Conditions III. Arts and the Creative Economy IV. The Charrette V. Recommendations East Dedham Village Charrette 3 EAST DEDHAM VILLAGE CHARRETTE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN East Dedham Village Charrette 4 EAST DEDHAM VILLAGE CHARRETTE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY East Dedham Village Charrette 5 EAST DEDHAM VILLAGE CHARRETTE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN Introduction East Dedham Village Vision The East Dedham Village Charrette is a collaborative effort between the Town of Dedham, the Metropolitan Area East Dedham Village will once again be the economically Planning Council and East Dedham stakeholders to develop thriving, vibrant and attractive center of the East Dedham a shared community vision and strategic economic action community. plan for East Dedham. Engaged, open and coordinated communication between The project builds on recent investment in the Mother residents, community groups, town leaders, business Brook Arts and Community Center, new recreation and park people, artists, and cultural groups will remove barriers to areas, and a growing local arts presence to reestablish a vibrant village center in East Dedham that maximizes help create a place where targeted public and private connections to the historic Mother Brook while looking to investment create new creative economy jobs, residential the larger creative economy as the economic driver. -
DCR's Beaver Brook Reservation
Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Resource Management Planning Program RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN DCR’s Beaver Brook Reservation Historic Beaver Brook Reservation and Beaver Brook North Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts March 2010 DCR’s Beaver Brook Reservation Historic Beaver Brook Reservation and Beaver Brook North Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2010 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Ian A. Bowles, Secretary Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Commissioner Jack Murray, Deputy Commissioner for Parks Operations The Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), an agency of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, oversees 450,000 acres of parks and forests, beaches, bike trails, watersheds, dams, and parkways. Led by Commissioner Richard K. Sullivan Jr., the agency’s mission is to protect, promote, and enhance our common wealth of natural, cultural, and recreational resources. To learn more about DCR, our facilities, and our programs, please visit www.mass.gov/dcr. Contact us at [email protected]. Printed on Recycled Paper RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Expanded Beaver Brook Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 Planning Process 2 Distinctive Characteristics of the Expanded Reservation 2 Priority Findings 3 Recommendations 5 Capital Improvements 7 Land Stewardship Zoning Guidelines 9 Management -
Improved Soldiers Field Road Crossings
Improved Soldiers Field Road Crossings DCR Public Meeting Monday, November 19th – 6:00pm-7:30pm Josephine A. Fiorentino Community Center Charlesview Residences 123 Antwerp Street Extension, Brighton, MA 02135 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Governor Charles D. Baker Lieutenant Governor Karyn E. Polito Energy and Environmental Secretary Matthew A. Beaton Department of Conservation and Recreation Commissioner Leo P. Roy DCR Mission Statement To protect, promote and enhance our common wealth of natural, cultural and recreational resources for the well-being of all. Purpose of Public Meeting • Project Overview • Overview of Public Input from Previous Outreach Efforts • Design Options for Telford Street Crossing • Proposed Concept • Input from Public Soldiers Field Road Crossings 1. Public Input after Meeting #1 – why revisit the design concept? 2. At-Grade Crossing at Telford Street – what will this look like? 3. Design and Construction Methods – how will changes to design affect construction? Project Partners Harvard’s Total Contribution: $ 3,500,000 Feasibility Study: -$ 150,000 Total Project Allocation: $ 3,350,000 Initial Improvements Concept Initial Improvements Concept Initial Improvements Concept Public Input from Meeting #1 Overall support for the project, but with comments Connections to the river should accommodate cyclists, pedestrians, and disabled users Bridge rehabilitation will leave bridge too narrow and ramp switchbacks too difficult to accommodate bicycles, strollers, and pedestrians Desire for more landscaping throughout -
City of Somerville, Massachusetts Mayor’S Office of Strategic Planning & Community Development Joseph A
CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR’S OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOSEPH A. CURTATONE MAYOR MICHAEL F. GLAVIN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE STAFF REPORT Site: 501 Mystic Valley Parkway Case: HPC 2017.042 Applicant Name: POAH LLC Date of Application: June 9, 2017 Recommendation: Significant Hearing Date: July 18, 2017 I. Historical Association Architectural Description: 501 Mystic Valley Parkway is a classic mid-century modern single-story H shaped brick ranch house with a large greenhouse addition located centrally on the roof. The roof is 3-tab asphalt shingle. There is a large chimney. Doors and windows are appropriate for the date of construction and have not been altered. There is also a modern concrete block shed and a garage with a second story modern apartment. See photos. Historical Context: Mystic Valley Parkway is on the National Register of Historic Places as part of the Metropolitan Park System of Greater Boston. According to https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/massachusetts_conservation/metro_park_system_of_greater_boston.html “The Mystic Valley Parkway has adjacent elements that were added to the National Register of Historic Places through the Water Supply System of Metropolitan Boston Thematic Resource Area, including the Medford Pipe Bridge (1897-8), Mystic Dam (1864), Mystic Pumping Station (1862-4), and Mystic Gatehouse (1862-8).” 501-503 Mystic Valley Parkway was acquired by Anthony W. DiCecca in 1949 on land previously been owned by what is now the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority and was attached to the Mystic Water Pumping Station next door. The house was constructed 1950 by Anthony W. -
Hyde Park Bulletin
The Hyde Park Bulletin Volume 17, Issue 41 October 11, 2018 HPNA digs deeper into Neponset Greenway talks development issues bike paths in Hyde Park Members of the Hyde Park Neighborhood Association met and discussed the Railyard 5 Project, shown above, among other projects. COURTESY PHOTO Mary Ellen Gambon about 20-something units,” Staff Reporter HPNA president John Raymond said. “They tried to About 25 members of the confuse us by lowering the Hyde Park Neighborhood As- square footage by about 7,500 The Neponset River Greenway Council met last Wednesday and discussed its progress in Hyde Park. sociation attended the meeting square feet. But there wasn’t a PHOTO BY JEFF SULLIVAN on Thursday, October 4 to dis- big reduction in units.” cuss new development issues – The developer, Jordan D. one in the near future and the Jeff Sullivan bike lane on the streets and a na- project, which connected the Warshaw, of the Noannet ture bike path through protected Martini Shell to Mattapan be- other on the radar. Staff Reporter Group, eliminated 29 units areas of the Massachusetts De- tween the Truman Parkway and The first focus was a recap from the final plan. There will The Neponset River partment of Recreation and Con- the Neponset River. It opened in of the meeting on October 1 on be 364 for-rent apartments and Greenway Council (NRGC) met servation (DCR). Currently, there 2012 and was completed in the Sprague Street development 128 for-sale condos, according last week and discussed several are ways to bike the path, but some 2015, spanning to the Neponset project at 36-70 Sprague Street to the proposal. -
Arlington Master Plan DRAFT Interim Report
Arlington Master Plan REVISED Working Paper Series: Natural Resources and Open Space Introduction Arlington’s landscape is defined by natural features that influence the location and intensity of development. Lakes and ponds, brooks, wetlands, and protected open space provide important public health and ecological benefits, as well as recreational opportunities. Activities in Arlington also affect neighboring towns, so local policies and practices relating to water and other natural resources have regional consequences. This master plan element focuses on irreplaceable land and water resources that must be considered in Menotomy Rocks Park trail. decisions about where, what, and how much to build as Arlington continues to evolve. A. GOALS FOR OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES • Ensure that Arlington’s neighborhoods, commercial areas, and infrastructure are developed in harmony with natural resource concerns. • Value, protect, and maintain the Town’s physical beauty, natural habitats, water bodies, parks, and other open spaces. • Use sustainable planning and engineering approaches to improve air and water quality, reduce flooding, and enhance ecological diversity by managing our natural resources. • Mitigate and adapt to climate change. B. KEY FINDINGS • Arlington’s beauty is influenced by many factors – its varied landscape and topography, the presence of water resources along its borders, and its historic architecture. Arlington’s distinctive street trees and urban woodlands also play a critical role in Arlington’s appearance, walkability, and environmental health. Increased investments in tree maintenance and replacement, including enough personnel to carry out a comprehensive tree and streetscape management program, will be important for Arlington’s future quality of life. • Arlington’s ability to address critical environmental challenges will hinge, in part, on the policies it adopts to guide and regulate future development, and in particular along the corridor encompassing Massachusetts Avenue and the Mill Brook.