DOCSLIB.ORG

Describe and Explain the Growth of Imperialism in General and Its Impact on Africa in Particular

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Describe and Explain the Growth of Imperialism in General and Its Impact on Africa in Particular Describe and explain the growth of imperialism in general and its impact on Africa in particular. Also, with reference to selected examples, describe and account for the colonial rivalries that consequently developed. Imperialism- is “where one country possesses, governs or controls other countries beyond its own borders.” At the start of the 20th century, nations started to engage in ‘aggressive pursuit of colonies, accompanied by their intense rivalry with one another and motivated by notions of their own racial and intellectual superiority to the peoples whom they sought to control.’ Their aim was to build up their power and wealth through the conquering of various countries which they perceived as inferior. Imperialism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century was characterised by the Industrial Revolution that was occurring at roughly the same time. Industrialisation and technology changed the very nature of imperialism- through the development of military, communications and transportation technologies. Thus imperialism grew at a rapid rate. This new imperialism was characterised by an enormous inequality in the distribution of power. In fact, so much so, that the period between 1870 and 1914 became known as the ‘age of imperialism’. There were no conventions that regulated the rapid and aggressive rate at which the European powers ‘scrambled’ for territories. Source 1- The Mad Scramble for Africa, by David Bainbridge Source 1 is a cartoon depicting various European nations each pulling on a blanket-like Africa, each wanting a piece of it. The source is reliable as it is not biased, simply depicting what was happening at that time. It can be corroborated by other sources. The caption, ‘The Mad Scramble for Africa’ was used to describe the European nations’ rush to conquer and divide up the African continent. For the European empires, Africa provided a market in which their manufactured goods could be sold, as well as supply them with the raw materials like oil, diamonds, gold, copper and tin that they needed to further production. African colonies also provided cheap labour, and African coastal trading ports were important for trade and investment. A famous British economist, J. A. Hobson- argued that the real driving force of imperialism was ‘capitalistic greed’. Take up the White Man's burden-- Send forth the best ye breed-- Go bind your sons to exile To serve your captives' need; To wait in heavy harness, On fluttered folk and wild-- Your new-caught, sullen peoples, Half-devil and half-child. - Excerpt from The White Man’s Burden, by Rudyard Kipling in 1899 Source 2 Source 2 demonstrates the perspective of a British poet on imperialism. He describes it as their duty, or mission civilisatrice, as superior ‘civilised’ nations to bring political, social and cultural benefits to inferior, ‘uncivilised’ nations. This demonstrates an attitude of racism towards the colonial people, as Kipling describes them as “new caught…people, half devil and half child,’ reflecting European views of that time- that Africans were primitive and uncivilised. However the Europeans’ mission civilisatrice undermined the sense of unity that the native people derived from their own culture. Ultimately, it divided the native people and hence it made any opposition to European rule a futile attempt. Many traditional African values were destroyed. “I regard the idea of imperialism as a crime against humanity, because it enables any part of the human race which is armed with modern scientific knowledge to rule over less fortunate sections of mankind, simply because the latter are unable to resist the force which supports such rule. We demand the right to take over responsibility for the government of our country. We demand the right to be free to make mistakes and learn from our experience.” - Nnamdi Azikiwe (1904 –1996)- first president of independent Nigeria Source 3 Source 3 shows the perspective of imperialism from an African point of view. It reflects the widespread view that imperialism as unfair, describing it as a “crime against humanity”. It demonstrates African support for independence and self-determination. European rule created divisions between African tribes where there they previously did not exist. For example, when Belgium took over Rwanda-Burundi, they forced the population to carry cards identifying them as either Hutu (the ethnic majority) or Tutsi (the previously ruling minority). However, since many of the people did not know which of these they were, the Belgians decided that anyone who owned more than ten cows was Tutsi. This created much division and resentment between the population, as the Tutsi received special privileges, like the best education. By claiming ownership of the land, the Europeans disregarded tribal, ethnic and cultural boundaries, which caused tribal clashes. Although the Europeans exploited the native Africans in terms of labour and land, there were some benefits of European imperialism. These included roads, railways, schools, hospitals, improved sanitation, and better farming methods. These benefits, as well as medicine and better nutrition, increased the life expectancy of Africans. Some also received better education and economic opportunities. The ‘scramble for Africa’ created colonial rivalries, as each European power competed with another to claim as much control of Africa as possible. For example, Britain and France were competing for control of the Suez Canal, which linked the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea. It was important for trade as it allowed passage between Europe and Asia, without having to go all the way around Africa. Britain was afraid that French control of the Canal would threaten British trade with its Indian colony. In 1875, Britain snatched control of the Suez Canal from France, effectively giving it control of Egypt in 1882. This in turn created a lapse in relations with France. Each European nation strived to be the best, and aspired to achieve the same status and power as Britain- the world’s greatest power. As a result, aggressive competition between the great European powers escalated, during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, largely fuelled by nationalism, as well as the need for status and power. This led to colonial rivalries, demonstrated in the below source. “All great nations in the fullness of their strength have desired to set their mark upon barbarian lands & those who fail to participate in this great rivalry will play a pitiable role in time to come.” - Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 –1896)- German historian during the time of the German Empire Source 4 Source 4 depicts the perspective of a German historian at the time of imperialism. It is important as it gives insight into the scramble for Africa as well as general imperialism. They all wanted to “set their mark upon barbarian lands.” Colonial rivalry between France and Italy occurred when France took control of Tunisia (1881), as Italy had also wanted to control it. Italy responded by allying with Germany, France’s enemy. There was further tension between Germany and France when Germany challenged French control in Morocco, which also added to anti German sentiment. There was tension between Germany and France due to the latter harbouring resentment against their defeat by Germany in the Franco-Prussian war (1870) and the loss of the French territory Alasce-Lorraine. Germany’s imperialistic ambitions also added to this tension. France and Britain had competing interests in Africa. France wanted to unite its colonies from East Africa to West Africa, while Britain wanted to unite its colonies from North Africa to South Africa. This caused tension between both powers, as their ‘line of colonies’ crossed in Sudan- and only one power could take control. In the end, they entered an ‘entente cordiale’, in which Britain allowed French control of Morocco while France allowed British control of Sudan. In conclusion, imperialism is the policy of acquiring colonies that are politically submissive and economically profitable to their imperial owners. It resulted in the exploitation of many countries perceived a s ‘inferior’, but especially those in Africa during the European ‘scramble for Africa’. As a result, there was much conflict between the European powers and their colonies, as well conflict between the European powers. By 1912, all of Africa except Ethiopia and Liberia were ruled as European colonies. By 1914, 85% of the Earth’s surface was dominated by European powers. Bibliography- Ludwikowski, Emily. (2011) ‘Chapter 26:Imperialism’ [Online]. Blogspot. Available: http://eludwikowskiimperialism.blogspot.com/2011/03/political-cartoons-about-imperialism-in.html [Accessed 16/8/11) What was imperialism, and what effects did it have? [n.d. Online]. Whittier. Available: http://web.whittier.edu/academic/history/worldhistory/imperialism.pdf [Accessed 16/8/11] Prof. Rempel, Gerhard. (n.d.) ‘The New Imperialism’ [Online]. Aldridgeshs. Available: http://www.aldridgeshs.eq.edu.au/sose/modrespg/imperial/feb5.htm [Accessed 17/8/11] Caswell, Thomas (2003) ‘Imperialism: Scramble for Africa’ [Online]. Regents Prep Global History. Available: http://regentsprep.org/Regents/global/themes/imperialism/africa.cfm [Accessed 16/8/11] Nosotro, Rit (2010) ‘Imperialism’ [Online]. HyperHistory.net Available: http://www.hyperhistory.net/apwh/essays/cot/t1w16mperialsimp1mw.htm [Accessed 16/8/11] ‘Effects of Imperialism’ [n.d. Online]. Aldridgeshs. Available: http://www.aldridgeshs.eq.edu.au/sose/modrespg/imperial/essays/effects.htm
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism a Popular Outline
    Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism A Popular Outline Vladimir Ilyich Lenin Written: January-June, 1916 Published: First published in mid-1917 in pamphlet form, Petrograd. Published according to the manuscript and verified with the text of the pamphlet. Source: Lenin’s Selected Works, Progress Publishers, 1963, Moscow, Volume 1, pp. 667766. Transcription\Markup: Tim Delaney & Kevin Goins (2008) Public Domain: Lenin Internet Archive 2005. You may freely copy, distribute, display and perform this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit “Marxists Internet Archive” as your source. Table of Contents Preface ....................................................................................................... 4 Preface to the French and German Editions ............................................ 5 I. Concentration of Production and Monopolies..................................... 10 II. Banks and Their New Role ................................................................. 20 III. Finance Capital and the Financial Oligarchy .................................. 33 IV. Export of Capital ............................................................................... 45 V. Division of the World Among Capitalist Associations ........................ 50 VI. Division of the World Among the Great Powers ............................... 57 VII. Imperialism as a Special Stage of Capitalism .................................. 66 VIII. Parasitism and Decay of Capitalism .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of American Imperialism: a Critical Evaluation THOMAS WEISSKOPF
    Theories of American Imperialism: A Critical Evaluation THOMAS WEISSKOPF contended that the issue is whether or not the I. Introduction key United States &dquo;requires&dquo; imperialism in order in Almost a decade of overt war in Indochina; some sense to survive.[5] While these may be military interventions in Greece, Iran, Lebanon, important and interesting issues in their own right, the Congo, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Colum- they do not seem to me to go to the heart of the bia, Guatemala, Panama, Bolivia, China, Korea theoretical distinction between radical and ortho- and Thailand; military missions throughout most dox approaches. of the &dquo;free world&dquo;; and American economic I believe that what fundamentally unites dominance of countless Third World countries radical theorists is an insistence on analyzing have combined to impress upon all but the most societies as integrated social systems in concrete recalcitrant observer the truth in the assertion that historical circumstances. The radical approach in the postwar period the United States has been a differs from the orthodox approach to the social formidable imperialist power. Indeed, a brief sciences in the Western world (1) by emphasizing review of American history points to a pattern of the interdependence of different spheres of a imperialist behavior that goes back long before the society rather than compartmentalizing these postwar period to the very beginning of the Federal spheres and treating them independently, and (2) republic.[l] That the United States is now and has by analyzing a society in terms of its specific insti- long been an imperialist power is a proposition that tutional structure rather than in terms of abstract is no longer subject to serious debate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospective Foreign Policy of a Corbyn Government and Its U.S. National Security Implications
    SEPTEMBER 2019 The Prospective Foreign Policy of a Corbyn Government and its U.S. National Security Implications DR. AZEEM IBRAHIM © 2019 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org. ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. HUDSON INSTITUTE 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Fourth Floor Washington, D.C. 20004 P: 202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Cover: A flag supporting Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn flies with Big Ben in the background during the “Not One Day More” march at Parliament Square on July 1, 2017 in London, England. (Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images) SEPTEMBER 2019 The Prospective Foreign Policy of a Corbyn Government and its U.S. National Security Implications DR. AZEEM IBRAHIM AUTHOR Dr. Azeem Ibrahim is a Research Professor at the Strategic Studies Policy, Chicago Tribune, LA Times and Newsweek. He is also the Institute, U.S. Army War College and member of the Board of author of “The Rohingyas: Inside Myanmar’s Hidden Genocide” Directors at the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (Hurst 2016) and “Radical Origins: Why We Are Losing the War and Political Violence at the Department of War Studies at Kings Against Islamic Extremism” (Pegasus 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Rosa Luxemburg and the Global Violence of Capitalism
    Socialist Studies / Études socialistes 6(2) Fall 2010: 160-172 Copyright © 2010 The Author(s) SPECIAL SECTION ON ROSA LUXEMBURG’S POLITICAL ECONOMY Rosa Luxemburg and the Global Violence of Capitalism PAUL LE BLANC Department of History and Political Science, LaRoche College. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States Abstract: Rosa Luxemburg’s pungent honesty is evident in her critical-minded and ‘unorthodox’ analysis of the economic expansionism of imperialism that arose out of the accumulation of capital. Despite an idiosyncratic reading and critique of Marx’s Capital, she sought to defend and advance the revolutionary perspectives of classical Marxism. Criticisms and counterpoised analyses offered by Rosdolsky, Bukharin, Lenin, and Robinson have not diminished what are generally seen as brilliant contributions. Militarism, war, and inhumanity are perceived as essential to imperialism in her analyses, and imperialism is seen as central to the nature of capitalism. Luxemburg’s account of global economic development reflect impressive economic insight, historical sweep, and anthropological sensitivity that impress critics as well partisans. Résumé : Le franc parler de Rosa Luxemburg est évident dans ses analyses critiques et ‘hétérodoxes’ de l’expansionnisme économique de l’impérialisme qui a émergé de l’accumulation du capital. Malgré une lecture idiosyncratique et critique du Capital de Marx, elle cherchait à défendre et à avancer les perspectives révolutionnaires du marxisme classique. Les critiques et contre-analyses offertes par Rosdolsky, Boukharine, Lénine et Robinson n’ont pas diminué des contributions communément admises comme brillantes. Dans ses analyses, le militarisme, la guerre et l’inhumanité sont perçues comme essentiels à l’impérialisme et l’impérialisme occupe une place centrale dans la nature du capitalisme.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism by V.I
    Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism By V.I. Lenin Lenin wrote Imperialism in the first half of 1916, while in exile in Switzerland. The ​ historical and political context is important to understanding the significance of the work. World War I was a momentous event, which plunged the international labour movement into crisis, as the workers’ leaders failed to analyse it correctly and to politically arm the working class to fight the brutal imperialist war. Many of the leaders of the Second International, who had capitulated to social chauvinism, portrayed imperialism as simply a “bad” policy implemented by one or another country’s capitalist government, or a consequence of nationalistic attitudes. In Imperialism Lenin cut through this confusion and politically rearmed the most ​ ​ advanced workers with a materialist analysis of how predatory wars, annexationism, etc. flowed directly from capitalism in its monopoly stage. He outlined the processes through which the “old” capitalism, characterised by free market competition, has been replaced by imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. Imperialism is characterised by the domination of monopolies and finance capital on an international scale, with the export of capital leading to the big imperialist powers carving up the world. That competition would eventually give way to monopolistic domination was something that Marx and Engels had predicted in advance. The fact that Marx and Engels’ predictions were borne out by history is a testament to the strength of the dialectical materialist method and to the continuity of theory stretching from the founders of scientific socialism to Lenin and the Bolsheviks. Throughout the book, as he outlines his analysis of imperialism, Lenin also attacks petit-bourgeois reformists and social chauvinists like Kautsky for their failure to provide a Marxist explanation of imperialism, and consequently their failure to take an independent working class position on the eve of WWI, which was the ultimate betrayal that killed the Second International.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperialism As the Highest Stage of Capitalism
    LITTLE LENIN LIBRARY V O L I M E F I FT E E N 4?4 * IMPERIALISM The Highest Stage of Capitalism b y V. I. LENIN S* One Shilling and Sixpence Net IMPERIALISM THE HIGHEST STAGE OF CAPITALISM i THE LITTLE LENIN LIBRARY Reprinls o f his more important short works and articles. 1. The Teachings o f K arl Marx. Od. 2 . T h e W a r a n d t h e S e c o n d I nternational . I s . (6d. paper). 3. Socialism a n d W ar. Is. (6d. paper). 4 . W h a t i s t o b e D o n e ? 2 s. 5 . T h e P a r i s C o m m u n e . I s . 6 . R e v o l u t io n o f 1 9 0 5 . Is . 7 . R e l i g io n . I s . 8. Letters f r o m A f a r . 9 d . 9 . T h e T a s k s o f t h e P r o l e t a r ia t in O u r R e v o l u t io n . 9<L 10. T h e A p r i l Co n f e r e n c e . I s . 11. The Threatening Catastrophe and How to Fight It. I s . 12. W i l l t h e B o l s h e v i k s R e t a in S t a t e P o w e r T 9 d .
    [Show full text]
  • Anthony Brewer, Marxist Theories of Imperialism: a Critical Survey
    Marxist Theories of Imperialism A Critical Survey This seminal account of Marxist theories of imperialism is now appearing in a revised and expanded edition. Covering figures as diverse as Hobson, Luxembourg, Hilferding, Bukharin, Lenin, Frank, Wallerstein, Emmanuel and Warren, as well as Marx himself, it analyses how Marxists have accounted for the role of imperialism in the spread of world capitalism. Marx had expected the spread of capitalism to lead to full capitalist development everywhere (unless anticipated by socialist revolution), while Lenin and his contemporaries concentrated on the role of monopoly and inter-imperialist rivalry. More recently, the focus of theory has shifted to the explanation of underdevelopment, which has prompted a renaissance of Marxist thought. This book provides a clear guide to this important body of theory, establishing how the competing theories relate to each other and assessing them in terms of their logical coherence and their relevance to real problems. Anthony Brewer is senior lecturer in Economics at the University of Bristol. He is the author of A Guide to Marx’s Capital, 1984, and of a number of articles in learned journals. Marxist Theories of Imperialism A Critical Survey Second Edition Anthony Brewer London and New York First published 1980 by Routledge & Kegan Paul This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001. Second edition 1990 © 1980, 1990 Anthony Brewer All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • What Were the Motivations Behind 19Th Century Imperialism? Objectives: Describe the Motivations Behind 19Th Century Imperialism
    What were the motivations behind 19th century imperialism? Objectives: Describe the motivations behind 19th century imperialism. Imperialism is the d omination by one country of the political, economic, and/or cultural life of another country or region. Countries or regions controlled by another country are called colonies. The Roman Empire and the Mongol Empire were two of history's greatest early imperial powers. While imperialism has always existed, the motives or c auses h ave changed over time. Directions: U sing the chart below, respond to the questions. 1500s-1700s (14th-18th century) 1800s (19th century) Empires conquered other civilizations with the Industrialized nations conquered other nations with economic goals of the economic goals of ● Qnding p recious metals like silver and gold ● securing r aw materials needed to make ● Qnding a direct sources of Asian spices that goods had become too expensive due to Muslim ● secure m arkets to sell the goods control of trade routes manufactured in industrial factories 1. How did the economic motives of imperialism change from the 14th-18th century to the 19th century? 2. What turning point in 18th century Europe shifted the economic motivations of imperialism? What were the economic motivations for 19th century imperialism? Directions: Examine each of the following documents about the reasons for 19th century imperialism, then answer the questions that accompany them. Industrial The Industrial Revolution was the period in which the production of goods shifted from Revolution hand production methods to complex machines. During the Industrial Revolution, and the Birth capitalism, an economic system with the goal of generating proQt and wealth took root.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxist Theories of Imperialism: Evolution of a Concept
    Marxist theories of imperialism: evolution of a concept By Murray Noonan, BA (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Communication and the Arts Faculty of Arts, Education and Human Development Victoria University September, 2010 ABSTRACT Over the course of the twentieth century and into the new millennium, critical analysis of imperialism has been a feature of Marxist thought. One of the salient concerns of Marxist theorising of imperialism has been the uncovering of the connections between the capitalist accumulation process and the political and economic domination of the world by advanced capitalist countries. The conceptualising and theorising of imperialism by Marxists has evolved in response to developments in the global capitalist economy and in international politics. For its methodological framework, this thesis employs conceptual and generational typologies, which I term the ‘generational typology of Marxist theories of imperialism’. This methodological approach is used to assess the concept of imperialism as sets of ideas with specific concerns within three distinct phases. The first phase, starting in 1902 with Hobson and finishing in 1917 with Lenin’s pamphlet, covers who I call the ‘pioneers of imperialism theory’. They identified changes to capitalism, where monopolies, financiers and finance capital and the export of capital had become prominent. The second phase of imperialism theory, the neo-Marxist phase, started with Sweezy in 1942. Neo-Marxist imperialism theory had its peak of influence in the late 1960s to early 1980s, declining in influence since. Writers in this cohort focussed on the lack of development of the peripheral countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword to Spokesman’S British Efforts to Re-Take Them Were New Edition of J
    Corbyn:Template.qxd 28/10/2015 09:35 Page 35 35 Internationalist J A Hobson wrote his great tome in a different age. His thoughts were dominated at work by the zenith of the British Empire and the Boer War. The outcome of the war demonstrated Britain’s then ability in sustaining global reach, since Elizabethan times, but also its extreme vulnerability. At home the poor physique of working class Jeremy Corbyn soldiers led to Haldane’s investigation into working class health and living conditions. The difficulty in containing the rebellious Boers, and the huge opposition to the war, encouraged further doubts about the whole Empire project. What was remarkable was that Hobson wrote Imperialism at the end of the scramble for Africa in which Britain had gained enormous tracts of land, and Rhodes was busying himself with the Cape to Cairo railway project. The most cynical of western manoeuvres, the Congress of Berlin in 1884, had agreed on the lines on the map, which largely still exist and have been the cause of endless wars and the loss of many lives. What is interesting is the way in which Hobson contrasts the ‘new’ African Empire and global reach that Britain had finally gained for itself with the two earlier editions of Britain’s empire. The American Empire had collapsed in the eighteenth century, when the thirteen colonies rebelled Written in 2011 as the and finally gained their independence; Foreword to Spokesman’s British efforts to re-take them were new edition of J. A. unsuccessful. Even despite the US Civil Hobson’s influential War, the new power over the water was now classic, Imperialism: A almost as great as the old imperial powers Study, the Leader of the of France, Britain and Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Transimperial Roots of American Anti-Imperialism
    Transimperial Roots of American Anti-Imperialism: The Transatlantic Radicalism of Free Trade, 1846-1920 [Chapter forthcoming in Kristin Hoganson and Jay Sexton, eds., Powering Up the Global: Taking U.S. History into Transimperial Terrain (Duke University Press, in press).] Marc-William Palen “The clear connection between the anti-imperialist movement and earlier movements for liberal reform has never received much attention,” Christopher Lasch observed sixty years ago. Despite the distance of time, his observation still remains remarkably salient today. Most scholarship on the American Anti-Imperialist League (AIL, 1898-1920) has continued to focus narrowly on the period between its founding in 1898 during the Spanish-American War and the end of the U.S. war in the Philippines in 1902. This chronological narrowing not only sidelines the continued anti-imperial activities of the AIL leaders in the years that followed; it also hides U.S. anti-imperial efforts to thwart transimperial projects in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Asia-Pacific in the decades that preceded the formation of the AIL.1 Considering that historians have long associated free trade with late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century Anglo-American imperialism, this story begins at what, at first sight, might seem an unlikely starting point: the mid-nineteenth-century Anglo- American free-trade movement. Although this might at first bring to mind imperial ambitions of worldwide market access, meaning access to an entire imperial world system, free-trade ideas in fact spurred U.S. anti-imperialism at the turn of the twentieth century. Going well beyond opposition to mercantilist policies intended to benefit particular empires, they contained a far larger imperial critique.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonialism and Imperialism, 1450-1950 by Benedikt Stuchtey
    Colonialism and Imperialism, 1450-1950 by Benedikt Stuchtey The colonial encirclement of the world is an integral component of European history from the Early Modern Period to the phase of decolonisation. Individual national and expansion histories referred to each other in varying degrees at dif- ferent times but often also reinforced each other. Transfer processes within Europe and in the colonies show that not only genuine colonial powers such as Spain and England, but also "latecomers" such as Germany participated in the historical process of colonial expansion with which Europe decisively shaped world history. In turn, this process also clearly shaped Europe itself. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Colonialism and Imperialism 3. Regions and periods 4. Forms 5. Outlook 6. Appendix 1. Literature 2. Notes Citation Introduction In world history, no continent has possessed so many different forms of colonies and none has so incomparably defined access to the world by means of a civilising mission as a secular programme as did modern Europe. When Spain and Portugal partitioned the world by signing the Treaty of Tordesillas (ᇄ Media Link #ab) on 7 June 1494, they declared a genuine European claim to hegemony. A similar claim was never staked out in this form by a world empire of Antiquity or a non-European colonial power in the modern period, such as Japan or the USA. The extraordinary continuity of Chi- nese colonialism or that of the Aztecs in Central America before the Spaniards arrived is indeed structurally comparable to modern European expansion. But similar to the Phoenician and the Roman empires, the phenomenon of expansion usually ended with colonisation and not in colonial development.
    [Show full text]