AGENDA METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION Thursday, August 06, 2020 1:30 PM
The virtual meeting of the Metropolitan Area Planning Commission will be held on August 6, 2020 at 1:30 PM in the City Hall Building, 1st floor - City Council Chambers, 455 N. Main, Wichita, Kansas
The meeting will be held virtually, public participation is available in multiple ways, those without technology options can participate by going to Century II – Room 101B – 225 West Douglas Avenue, Wichita, Kansas 67202 (specified at the bottom of this notice). If you have any questions regarding the meeting or items on this notice, please call the Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Department at (316) 268-4421.
Please see the end of this agenda for instructions on Public Virtual participation.
1. Approval of the prior MAPC meeting minutes July 23, 2020
2. CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Items may be taken in one motion unless there are questions or comments. Description will go here.
2.1 SUB2020-00032: One-Step Final Plat – WHISPERING CREEK ADDITION; located on the north side of East 37th Street th, Nor 950 feet east of North Woodlawn Boulevard.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approved 6-0
2.2 SUB2020-00033: One-Step Final Plat– MEL HAMBELTON 3RD ADDITION; located 300 feet south of West Kellogg Drive, one -half mile east of South 119th Street West.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approved 5-0-1 (B.Johnson –abstained)
3. PUBLIC HEARING – VACATION ITEMS ADVERTISED TO BE HEARD NO EARLIER THAN Time will go here Items may be taken in one motion unless there are questions or comments. Complete legal descriptions are available for public inspection at the Metropolitan Area Planning Department – 271 West Third Street, 2nd Floor, Ste #201, Wichita, Kansas.
3.1 VAC2020-00023: City vacation of platted utility easements for new construction on property zoned LC generally located south of East Pawnee Avenue and west of South Hillside Avenue (2416 South El Rancho Road).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approved 5-0-1 (B.Johnson –abstained)
Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 2 August 06, 2020
3.2 VAC2020-00024: City vacation of a portion of a platted 25-foot front building setback; generally located 1,700 feet north of East 37th Street North and approximately 1,200 feet west of North Rock Road (4026 N. Sweet Bay Street).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approved 4-2 (Miles & Florence – nay)
3.3 VAC2020-00025: City vacation of a portion of a platted -foot 15 utility easement; generally located southwest of E 21st Street North and North Greenwich Road (10606 E. Glengate Circle).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approved 6-0
3.4 VAC2020-00026: City vacation of a platted15 -foot utility easement; generally located south of E. 17th Street North and North and approximately 1,500 feet east of North Hillside Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approved 5-0-1 (D.Foster –abstained)
3.5 VAC2020-00027: City Vacation of drainage and utility easement (0.07 acre) and Reserve A Uses (0.08 acre) for addresses on West University (6210, 6220, 6230 and 6240); generally located one block south of Maple Street between Maple Lane and Arapaho Drive.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approved 6-0
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS ADVERTISED TO BE HEARD NO EARLIER THAN 1:30PM
4.1 CON2020-00025: City Conditional Use to permit - multifamily development (3 dwelling units) on property zoned TF-3; generally located one block south of East Douglas Avenue and one-half mile west of South Oliver (217 S Fountain).
PRESENTING PLANNER: KATHY MORGAN
4.2 CON2020-00026: County Conditional Use to permit expansion of oil drilling and production RR generally located on the north side of K-254 and east of North 127th Street East (13160 East 61st Street North).
PRESENTING PLANNER: DAVE YEAROUT
4.3 ZON2020-00007: City Zone Change from SF-5 Single Family Residential to TF-3 Two Family Residential to permit the development of duplexes on property generally located one block east of SouthSeneca and one-quarter mile south of West 47th Street South (east of the intersection of 50th Street S. and Osage).
PRESENTING PLANNER: KATHY MORGAN
Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 3 August 06, 2020
4.4 ZON2020-00024: County Zone Change from SF-20 Single Family Residential to TF- 3 Two Family Residential; generally located northeast of South Greenwich and East Pawnee (11510 E Pawnee Road).
PRESENTING PLANNER: MATT WILLIAMS
4.5 ZON2020-00025: City rezone from SF-5 to LC for commercial development on property generally located south of East Pawnee Avenue and west of South Hillside Avenue (2438 South El Rancho Road).
PRESENTING PLANNER: MATT WILLIAMS
5. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
5.1 DER2020-00004: Sedgwick County Capital Improvements Program 2021-2025
PRESENTING PLANNER: MARY HUNT
5.2 DER2020-00005: City of Wichita Capital Improvements Program 2021-2030
PRESENTING PLANNER: MARY HUNT
5.3 2020 Development Trends Summary Presentation
PRESENTING PLANNER: STEPHEN BANKS
6. Other Matters/Adjournment
PLEASE NOTE THIS MEETING IS CONSIDERED AN EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE WICHITA-SEDGWICK COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION due to COVID-19, WHICH WILL IMPOSE SPECIAL PROCEDURES TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS:
The meeting will be conducted “virtually” using Go-To-Meeting. You have multiple options to participate: 1) submit comments ahead of time, 2) participate remotely, or 3) attend a virtual connection site in-person (see below).
Submit Comments Ahead of Time You can submit comments regarding items on the Planning Commission agenda to the Wichita- Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Department (Planning Department). Comments must be received by the Planning Department no later than 5pm 3 days prior to the meeting. Please be sure to provide ample time for delivery. The comments can be submitted in the following formats: email; letter; video; and audio message (mp3, etc.). The comment should indicate which item they pertain to and be less than three (3) minutes in duration. The comments should be submitted to Planning Department staff using the contact information below. The comments received ahead of the submission deadline will be shared with the MAPC, prior to or during the meeting.
Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 4 August 06, 2020
Email [email protected] Mailing Address Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Department Attn: David Yearout 271 W. 3rd Street – Suite 201 Wichita, KS 67202 Phone 316.268.4421 Fax 316-858-7764
Participate Remotely You can participate remotely either by phone, mobile device, or computer by using the following link or phone number. Please join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/856680853
You can also dial in using your phone. • United States: +1 (872) 240-3212 • Access Code: 856-680-853
Attend a Virtual Connection Site In-Person
You may also participate in the hearing by going to meeting room 101B at Century II (225 West Douglas) to participate in the Planning Commission meeting by “virtual” connection. Planning Department staff members will be available to assist in your participation at this location. This option is intended for those without other technology options, and who have not previously submitted recorded audio or video comments. If you have any written or visual materials you wish to present, please contact Planning Department Graphics staff (268-4464) by 5pm, 3 days prior to the meeting.
Scott Wadle, Secretary Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
WICHITA-SEDGWICK COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
JULY 23, 2020
The virtual meeting of the Metropolitan Area Planning Commission was held on July 23, 2020 starting at 1:30 PM in the City Hall Building, 1st floor - City Council Chambers, 455 N. Main, Wichita, Kansas. The public was able to participate by going to Century II – Room 101B – 225 West Douglas Avenue, Wichita, Kansas 67202. The following members were present in-person: Chuck Warren, Chair; Mike Greene, Vice- Chair; John McKay; Renee Duxler; Bob Doole; Hugh Nicks; David Foster; Cindy Miles. The following members were present online: Schane Gross; Joe Johnson and Terrell Florence. The following members were absent: Joshua Blick; Bill Johnson; Rob Hartman. Staff members present were: Scott Wadle, Interim Planning Director; Dave Yearout, Principal Planner; Kathy Morgan, Senior Planner; Neil Strahl, Senior Planner; Mary Hunt, Principal Planner; Philip Zevenbergen, Associate Planner; Justin Waggoner, Assistant County Counselor; and Jeff Vanzandt, Assistant City Attorney.
1. Approval of the July 9, 2020 MAPC minutes.
MOTION: Approve the July 9, 2020 minutes. MILES moved, GREENE seconded the motion, and it passed 10-0-1, J. JOHNSON abstaining.
2. CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 SUB2020-00029: One-Step Final Plat – HILLMAN ADDITION; located on the Northwest corner of South 375th Street West and West 15th Street South. COUNTY
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE 6-0
STAFF COMMENTS:
NOTE: This is unplatted property located in the County. It is in an area designated as “Small City 2035 Urban Growth Area” by the Community Investments Plan 2015-2035. It is located in the Cheney Urban Area of Influence.
A. Since sanitary sewer is not available to serve this property, the applicant shall contact Metropolitan Area Building and Construction Department to find out what tests may be necessary and what standards are to be met for approval of on-site sewerage. A memorandum shall be obtained specifying approval.
B. In accordance with the Urban Fringe Development standards, since this plat is located within the Cheney 2035 Urban Growth Area, the subdivider shall contact the City of Cheney, to determine the feasibility of connecting the proposed subdivision to city facilities. If feasible, then the subdivision shall be connected to the city’s sewer and/or water system in accordance with that city’s standards. The City of Cheney advised that sanitary sewer and water is available one half mile west of the property.
The applicant proposes connection to the water system of Garden Plain.
C. If improvements are guaranteed by petition(s), a notarized certificate listing the petition(s) shall be submitted to the Planning Department for recording.
1
D. County Stormwater advises the applicant needs to submit a drainage plan with offsite runoff calculations for review.
The Subdivision Committee approved the plat subject to the drainage plan being approved.
E. The plat denotes one opening along 15th Street. County Public Works requests complete access control east of the existing drive. The remaining west portion may be denoted as access control except one opening.
F. Sedgwick County Fire Department advises that the plat will need to comply with the Sedgwick County Service Drive Code.
G. County Surveying advises the bearing in the legal description of South 87°57’06” East needs corrected.
H. In the Register of Deeds signature block, the Book and Page needs included.
I. The Applicant has indicated a blanket pipeline easement for the area involved in this plat. The Applicant shall either obtain a release of the easement or provide proof that the easement has been confined. If confined, any portion of the easement impacting this site shall be denoted on the plat and shall be properly referenced. A recorded copy of the release/confinement of the easement shall be submitted.
J. County Surveying and MAPD requests review of a pdf prior to mylar submittal. Send to [email protected] and [email protected].
K. The Register of Deeds requires all names to be printed beneath the signatures on the plat and any associated documents.
L. Prior to development of the plat, the applicant is advised to meet with the United States Postal Service Growth Management Coordinator (Phone: (316) 946-4595) in order to receive mail delivery without delay, avoid unnecessary expense and determine the type of delivery and the tentative mailbox locations.
M. The applicant is advised that various State and Federal requirements (specifically but not limited to the Army Corps of Engineers, Kanopolis Project Office, Route 1, Box 317, Valley Center, KS 67147) for the control of soil and wind erosion and the protection of wetlands may impact how this site can be developed. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact all appropriate agencies to determine any such requirements.
N. The owner of the subdivision should note that any construction that results in earthwork activities that will disturb one acre or more of ground cover requires a Federal/State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Discharge Permit from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment in Topeka. Also, for projects located within the City of Wichita, erosion and sediment control devices must be used on ALL projects. For projects outside of the City of Wichita, but within the Wichita metropolitan area, the owner should contact the appropriate governmental jurisdiction concerning erosion and sediment control device requirements.
O. Perimeter closure computations shall be submitted with the final plat tracing.
P. The applicant should check City or County GIS mapping to determine whether the location of any taxing district boundaries (e.g. school districts) crosses their property and plan accordingly to avoid
2
unnecessary splitting of lots between taxing districts.
Q. Any removal or relocation of existing equipment of utility companies will be at the applicant’s expense.
R. A compact disk (CD) should be provided, which will be used by the City and County GIS Departments, detailing the final plat in digital format in AutoCAD. Please include the name of the plat on the disk. If a disk is not provided, please send the information via e-mail to Kathy Wilson (e-mail address: [email protected]).
MILES moved to approve. FOSTER seconded the motion.
Motion passes 11-0. ______2.2 SUB2020-00031: One-Step Final Plat – ALLEN WILLIAMS 3RD ADDITION; located on the north side of East 47th Street South, on the east side of South Clifton Avenue. COUNTY
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE 6-0
STAFF COMMENTS:
NOTE: This site is located in the County within three miles of Wichita’s boundary. It is designated as: “Industrial Improvement District” by the Community Investments Plan 2015-2035. A zone change (ZON2020-00005) has been approved from LC Limited Commercial to LI Limited Industrial for the south portion of Lot 1.
STAFF COMMENTS:
A. City of Wichita Public Works and Utilities Department advises water and sewer are available. Outside of City rates will apply. An Outside-the-City Agreement is needed.
B. If improvements are guaranteed by petition(s), a notarized certificate listing the petition(s) shall be submitted to the Planning Department for recording.
C. Sedgwick County Fire Department advises that the plat will need to comply with the 2012 International Fire Code, Appendix D.- Fire Apparatus Access Roads.
D. County Surveying and MAPD requests review of a pdf prior to mylar submittal. Send to [email protected] and [email protected].
E. The plattor’s text shall delete language regarding a Residential Drainage Relief Permit.
F. County Stormwater Management has approved the drainage plan.
G. The plat proposes one right in/right out opening along 47th Street and two openings along Clifton including a joint access opening. County Public Works advises the southernmost access opening along Clifton shall be reduced to the south 40 feet and a restrictive covenant or agreement shall be submitted that permits future cross-lot access with the abutting property owner to the south.
3
For Lot 2, which is adjacent to the BNSF railroad right-of-way, the Subdivision Regulations require 150 feet of complete access control dedicated along 47th Street from the centerline of the nearest railroad track. This places the right in/out access point too close to the existing drive located within the noted 50’ x 40’ joint access easement. County Public Works recommends complete access control along 47th Street South. A cross-lot access agreement shall be submitted that permits cross-lot access through Lot 1 for the benefit of Lot 2 or cross-lot access from the Dollar General Subdivision to the west along 47th Street.
Since 47th Street and Clifton are County roads, the plattor’s text needs corrected to reference access controls as being granted to the appropriate governing body.
H. In the title block the word “Wichita” needs removed.
I. County Public Works advises the existing sanitary sewer appears to lie outside the proposed 20-foot drainage and utility easement in the southeast corner of Lot 2.
J. County Public Works advises the existing KG&E right-of-way creates a potential loss of developable land. The applicant may benefit from contacting Evergy to re-align the right-of-way to match the north line of the Dollar General Subdivision.
K. County Surveying requests the width of the KG&E right-of-way near the south line of Lot 1, Block A be shown.
L. The joint access easement shall be established by separate instrument. Initial construction responsibilities and future maintenance of the driveway within the easement should also be addressed
M. GIS has requested the arterials include pre-directionals (“S CLIFTON AVE” and “E 47TH ST S”).
N. The 20-foot building setback along Clifton needs a dashed line.
O. To allow for County Commission approval of this plat, the County Commissioner signature block shall be included on the final plat tracing.
P. The Applicant is reminded that a platting binder is required with the final plat. Approval of this plat will be subject to submittal of this binder and any relevant conditions found by such a review.
Q. The applicant shall install or guarantee the installation of all utilities and facilities that are applicable and described in Article 8 of the MAPC Subdivision Regulations. (Water service and fire hydrants required by Article 8 for fire protection shall be as per the direction and approval of the Chief of the Fire Department.)
R. The Register of Deeds requires all names to be printed beneath the signatures on the plat and any associated documents.
S. Prior to development of the plat, the applicant is advised to meet with the United States Postal Service Growth Management Coordinator (Phone: (316) 946-4595) in order to receive mail delivery without delay, avoid unnecessary expense and determine the type of delivery and the tentative mailbox locations.
4
T. The applicant is advised that various State and Federal requirements (specifically but not limited to the Army Corps of Engineers, Kanopolis Project Office, Route 1, Box 317, Valley Center, KS 67147) for the control of soil and wind erosion and the protection of wetlands may impact how this site can be developed. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact all appropriate agencies to determine any such requirements.
U. The owner of the subdivision should note that any construction that results in earthwork activities that will disturb one acre or more of ground cover requires a Federal/State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Discharge Permit from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment in Topeka. Also, for projects located within the City of Wichita, erosion and sediment control devices must be used on ALL projects. For projects outside of the City of Wichita, but within the Wichita metropolitan area, the owner should contact the appropriate governmental jurisdiction concerning erosion and sediment control device requirements.
V. Perimeter closure computations shall be submitted with the final plat tracing.
W. The applicant should check City or County GIS mapping to determine whether the location of any taxing district boundaries (e.g. school districts) crosses their property and plan accordingly to avoid unnecessary splitting of lots between taxing districts.
X. Evergy advises that they will not participate in nor accept the conversion of their blanket easement via the platting process. Evergy advises they have been in contact with the applicant’s agent in February 2020 regarding the release process but to date have not received written request from the owner to start the release process, or received the funds required to start the process (non-refundable $500.00 to Evergy). Owner will be responsible for a 3rd party survey of the retained easement (not Baughman whom created the plat). Any removal or relocation of existing equipment of utility companies will be at the applicant’s expense.
Y. A compact disk (CD) should be provided, which will be used by the City and County GIS Departments, detailing the final plat in digital format in AutoCAD. Please include the name of the plat on the disk. If a disk is not provided, please send the information via e-mail to Kathy Wilson (e-mail address: [email protected]).
MILES moved to approve. FOSTER seconded the motion.
Motion passes 11-0. ______
3. PUBLIC HEARING – VACATION ITEMS
3.1 VAC2020-00020: County vacation of a utility easement for property development; generally located within one-half mile West of South Broadway Avenue and within one-quarter mile South of West 79th Street South (8147 S Vesta Ave).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPRROVE 6-0
The applicant has requested the vacation of a portion of the 16-foot platted utility easement on property addressed 8147 South Vesta Avenue. The property is generally located one-half mile west of South Broadway and within one-quarter mile south of West 79th Street South. This application is within the Haysville Influence Area. The applicant would like the area encumbered by the easement
5
to become buildable. The subject easement overlaps a 30-foot platted drainage easement on the south. This easement shall remain. The City of Haysville Planning Commission was notified of this case and has elected not to hear it. There are no public utilities located within the easement. Neither Evergy nor Cox have an objection to this vacation. Ennidh Garcia is Evergy’s Area Construction Service Representative and can be contacted at 316-261-6359 with questions about this case. The Willowdale 2nd Addition was recorded August 20, 1956. Based upon information available prior to the public hearing and reserving the right to make recommendations based on subsequent comments from County Traffic, Public Works/Water & Sewer/Stormwater, Fire, franchised utility representatives and other interested parties, Planning Staff has listed the following considerations (but not limited to) associated with the request to vacate the described portion of the platted utility easement. A. That after being duly and fully informed as to fully understand the true nature of this petition and the propriety of granting the same, the MAPC makes the following findings:
1. That due and legal notice has been given by publication as required by law, in the Wichita Eagle, of notice of this vacation proceeding one time July 2, 2020, which was at least 20 days prior to this public hearing. 2. That no private rights will be injured or endangered by vacating the described portion of the platted utility easement and that the public will suffer no loss or inconvenience thereby. 3. In justice to the petitioner, the prayer of the petition ought to be granted.
Conditions (but not limited to) associated with the request:
(1) If any utility services are found to be located within the area of the proposed Vacation, these services shall be relocated at the owner’s expense, to city standards, and the applicant shall provide Planning with the dedication of utility easements by separate instruments to go with the Vacation Order to be filed with the Register of Deeds. If relocation is not possible then this Vacation shall be rendered void as the current easement must remain in place.
(2) Per MAPC Policy Statement #7, all conditions are to be completed within one year of approval by the MAPC or the vacation request will be considered null and void. All vacation requests are not complete until the Wichita City Council or the Sedgwick County Board of County Commissioners have taken final action on the request and the vacation order and all required documents have been provided to the City, County and/or franchised utilities and the necessary documents have been recorded with the Register of Deeds.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE’S RECOMMENDED ACTION The Subdivision Committee recommends approval per staff recommendations.
MOTION: To approve subject to the recommendation of the Subdivision Committee and staff recommendation.
MCKAY moved, J. JOHNSON seconded the motion, and it carried (11-0). ______
6
3.2 VAC2020-00021: City vacation of the east 15 feet of a 35-foot building setback to allow a new Wendy’s footprint on site for longer drive-through queue; generally located southeast of the intersection of East Douglas Avenue and South Rock Road (160 S Rock Road).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPRROVE 6-0
The east 15 feet of the 35-foot front building setback for the South 130 feet of the West 185 feet of Lot 2, Bonnie Brae 2nd Addition, Wichita, Sedgwick County, Kansas.
The applicant proposes to vacate the east 15 feet of the platted 35-foot building setback located on and running parallel to the west property line of the south 130 feet of the west 185 feet of Lot 2, Bonnie Brae 2nd Addition. The lot is zoned LC Limited Commercial and is generally located southeast of the corner of South Rock Road and East Douglas Avenue. If approved, the request would reduce the platted building setback to 20 feet. The Unified Zoning Code’s (UZC) minimum front setback standard for the LC zoning district is 20 feet. The applicant’s request does not exceed the minimum front setback for LC zoning. The purpose of this request is to rebuild the existing Wendy’s restaurant with a new footprint and to allow a longer drive-thru queue. There are no public utilities in the subject area. Evergy has streetlight poles and lines in the right-of-way west of the setback area. The new building will have to meet clearances to these lines. LaDonna Vanderford is the Area Construction Service Representative for this case and can be contacted at 316-261-6290 with any questions.. The Bonnie Brae 2nd Addition was recorded with the Register of Deeds December 3, 1969. Based upon information available prior to the public hearing and reserving the right to make recommendations based on subsequent comments from Public Works, Stormwater, Water and Sewer, Traffic, Fire, franchised utility representatives and other interested parties, Planning Staff has listed the following considerations (but not limited to) associated with the request to vacate the described portions of platted building setback. B. That after being duly and fully informed as to fully understand the true nature of this petition and the propriety of granting the same, the MAPC makes the following findings:
4. That due and legal notice has been given by publication as required by law, in the Wichita Eagle, of notice of this vacation proceeding one time July 2, 2020, which was at least 20 days prior to this public hearing. 5. That no private rights will be injured or endangered by vacating the described portion of the platted front setback and that the public will suffer no loss or inconvenience thereby. 6. In justice to the petitioner, the prayer of the petition ought to be granted.
Conditions (but not limited to) associated with the request: (1) Vacate the described portion of the platted 35-foot front setback. Provide Planning Staff with legal descriptions of the approved vacated portions of the platted setback on a Word document, via e-mail, to be used on the Vacation Order. This must be provided to Planning prior to the case going to Council for final action.
(2) Any relocation or reconstruction of utilities made necessary by this vacation shall be the responsibility and at the expense of the applicant. Provide Planning with any needed easements dedicated by separate instrument with original signatures. These conditions must be completed prior to the case going to Council for final action.
(3) All improvements shall be according to City Standards and at the applicant’s expense.
7
(4) Per MAPC Policy Statement #7, all conditions shall be completed within one year of approval by the MAPC or the vacation request will be considered null and void. All vacation requests are not complete until the Wichita City Council or the Sedgwick County Board of County Commissioners have taken final action on the request and the vacation order and all required documents have been provided to the City, County and/or franchised utilities and the necessary documents have been recorded with the Register of Deeds.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE’S RECOMMENDED ACTION The Subdivision Committee recommends approval per staff recommendations.
MOTION: To approve subject to the recommendation of the Subdivision Committee and staff recommendation.
MCKAY moved, J. JOHNSON seconded the motion, and it carried (11-0).
______
3.3 VAC2020-00022: City vacation of a public utility easement to allow for a privately owner service; generally located one-quarter mile west of Meridian on Portwest Circle, south of West 53rd Street North (4921 N. Portwest Circle).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPRROVE 6-0
The Easement recorded in the Office of the Sedgwick County Register of Deeds in Film 1454 at Page 63, said Easement being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of Lot 5, Block 1, The Moorings 5th Addition to Wichita, Sedgwick County, Kansas; thence S66°30’00”W for a distance of 425.00 feet; thence N23°30’00”W for a distance of 36.36 feet; thence N60°14’25”E for a distance of 224.97 feet; thence N22°35’30”W for a distance of 13.57 feet; thence N66°30’00”E for a distance of 82.39 feet; thence S23°30’00”E for a distance of 20.00 feet; thence N66°30’00”E for a distance of 120.00 feet; thence S23°30’00”E for a distance of 58.00 feet to the point of beginning, except for the South 20.00 feet thereof; Note: This legal description will vacate the above-mentioned Easement, but does not and is not intended to vacate the east 20.00 foot platted utility easement.
The applicant has requested the vacation of a utility easement by separate instrument recorded with the Sedgwick County Register of Deeds in Film 1454 at Page 63. Said easement is located on property addressed 4921 North Portwest Circle, which is generally located one-half mile west of North Meridian Avenue and one-half mile south of West 53rd Street North. The applicant would like to vacate this easement to allow for privately owned service to his residence. A portion of the easement was vacated in 2015 (VAC2015-00027). This application is vacating the rest of the easement to the south and east of the previous vacation case. Staff notes that a portion of the easement by separate instrument overlaps the platted 20-foot utility easement on the east side of the subject property. The platted easement shall remain. This application will only vacate the easement by separate instrument.
There are no public utilities located within the easement. The water and sewer lines that serve the property are privately maintained. Cox has underground lines in the area. Any relocation is at the
8 applicant’s expense. Evergy has no objection to the vacation. However, they have indicated an area on the east side of the property that shall remain as an easement. See the Evergy Easement Attachment for the diagram. Richard Aitken is the Area Construction Representative for this case and can be contacted at 316-261-6334 with any questions. The Moorings 5th Addition was recorded August 7, 1990. Based upon information available prior to the public hearing and reserving the right to make recommendations based on subsequent comments from City Traffic, Public Works/Water & Sewer/Stormwater, Fire, franchised utility representatives and other interested parties, Planning Staff has listed the following considerations (but not limited to) associated with the request to vacate the described portion of the platted utility easement. C. That after being duly and fully informed as to fully understand the true nature of this petition and the propriety of granting the same, the MAPC makes the following findings:
7. That due and legal notice has been given by publication as required by law, in the Wichita Eagle, of notice of this vacation proceeding one time July 2, 2020, which was at least 20 days prior to this public hearing. 8. That no private rights will be injured or endangered by vacating the described portion of utility easesment and that the public will suffer no loss or inconvenience thereby. 9. In justice to the petitioner, the prayer of the petition ought to be granted.
Conditions (but not limited to) associated with the request: (3) If it is determined that the 20-foot platted utility easement is not sufficient to meet the needs of Evergy, the applicant shall retain a portion of the described easement or dedicate a new easement by separate instrument to meet Evergy needs. Applicable documents shall be submitted to Planning prior to this case going before City Council.
(4) If any utility services are found to be located within the area of the proposed Vacation, these services shall be maintained privately or shall be relocated at the owner’s expense, to city standards, and the applicant shall provide Planning with the dedication of utility easements by separate instruments to go with the Vacation Order to be filed with the Register of Deeds.
(5) Per MAPC Policy Statement #7, all conditions are to be completed within one year of approval by the MAPC or the vacation request will be considered null and void. All vacation requests are not complete until the Wichita City Council or the Sedgwick County Board of County Commissioners have taken final action on the request and the vacation order and all required documents have been provided to the City, County and/or franchised utilities and the necessary documents have been recorded with the Register of Deeds.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE’S RECOMMENDED ACTION The Subdivision Committee recommends approval per staff recommendations.
MOTION: To approve subject to the recommendation of the Subdivision Committee and staff recommendation.
MCKAY moved, J. JOHNSON seconded the motion, and it carried (11-0).
9
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
4.1 CON2020-00023: County Conditional Use to permit an Accessory Apartment on property th th zoned RR; generally located on the south side of West 13 Street North and west of North 199 Street West (20201 West 13th Street North).
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use to allow an accessory apartment in an existing building. The unplatted property is zoned RR Rural Residential and is approximately 25 acres. The subject site is located within the Goddard Urban Area of Influence in the unincorporated area of Sedgwick County.
The Wichita-Sedgwick County Unified Zoning Code (“UZC”) defines an “accessory apartment” (Art. II.Sec. II-B.1.b) as a dwelling unit that may be wholly within, or may be detached from a principal single-family dwelling unit. Accessory apartments are also subject to supplementary use regulation Art. III.Sec.III-D.6.a (1) a maximum of one accessory apartment may be allowed on the same lot as a single-family dwelling unit that may be within the main building, within an accessory building or constructed as an accessory apartment; (2) the appearance of an accessory apartment shall be compatible with the main dwelling unit and with the character of the neighborhood; (3) the accessory apartment shall remain accessory to and under the same ownership as the principal single-family dwelling unit, and the ownership shall not be divided or sold as a condominium and (4) the water and sewer service provided to the accessory apartment shall not be provided as separate service from the main dwelling. Electric, gas, telephone and cable television utility service may be provided as separate utility services.
The surrounding properties to the north, west and south are zoned RR. The uses include single-family residences and agricultural land. East of the subject property is the Ecks Harmony Hills subdivision on property zoned SF-20 Single-Family. Platting of the subject property is not required.
CASE HISTORY: The subject property is unplatted and no other planning cases have been filed for this site.
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: RR Single-family residence SOUTH: RR Single-family residence WEST: RR Single-family residence EAST: SF-20 Single-family residences, Ecks Harmony Hills Estate
PUBLIC SERVICES: West 13th Street North is a gravel arterial street with a 30-foot right-of-way and unpaved shoulders. The subject site has access to North 199th Street West and is approximately two miles north of Goddard. The property has an on-site alternative sewer system and is served by
10
Rural Water District #04.
CONFORMANCE TO PLANS/POLICIES: The 2035 Community Investments Plan Wichita Future Growth Concept map indicates the application area is located in the Small City Urban Growth Area. This category encompasses land within the 2035 urban growth areas for the small cities. Agricultural uses, rural-based businesses, and larger lot residential exurban subdivisions likely will be developed in this area and should occur in accordance with the Urban Fringe Development Standards for Wichita and Sedgwick County.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon information available prior to the public hearings, planning staff recommends that the request be APPROVED, with the following conditions:
(1) The accessory apartment shall remain accessory to and under the same ownership as the principal single-family residence (located at 20201 West 13th Street North) and the ownership shall not be divided or sold as a condominium.
(2) Onsite water and wastewater services shall be provided in compliance with the Sedgwick County Sanitation Code. Electric, gas, telephone and cable television utility service may be provided as separate utility services.
(3) The accessory apartment shall be compatible with the main structure and an elevation drawing submitted for approval by the Planning Director prior to issuance of permit.
(4) The applicant shall obtain all applicable permits including, but not limited to: building, health and zoning. This will include turning in plans for review and approval by the MABCD for the construction of the accessory apartment.
(5) Development and maintenance of the site shall be in conformance with the approved site plan.
(6) If the Zoning Administrator finds that there is a violation of any of the conditions of the Conditional Use, the Zoning Administrator, in addition to enforcing the other remedies set forth in Article VIII of the Unified Zoning Code, may, with the concurrence of the Planning Director, declare that the Conditional Use is null and void.
This recommendation is based on the following findings:
(1) The zoning, uses and character of the neighborhood: The subject site is located in an RR zoned area with lots ranging from one acre to 145 acres. Development in the area consists of large lot single-family residential and unimproved agricultural parcels. The surrounding properties to the north, west and south are zoned RR. The uses include single-family residences and agricultural land. East of the subject property is the Ecks Harmony Hills subdivision on property zoned SF-20 Single-Family.
(2) The suitability of the subject property for the uses to which it has been restricted: The subject site is currently zoned RR which permits the existing single-family residence. The property will continue to be used for one single-family residence; the size of the property easily accommodates an accessory structure with an apartment and the additional required parking space.
(3) Extent to which removal of the restrictions will detrimentally affect nearby property: Approval of the request should not detrimentally impact nearby properties. The conditions of approval should minimize any anticipated detrimental impacts.
11
(4) Conformance of the requested change to the adopted or recognized Comprehensive Plan and policies: The 2035 Community Investments Plan Wichita Future Growth Concept map indicates the application area is located in the Wichita Urban Growth Area. This category encompasses land within the 2035 urban growth areas for Wichita and the small cities. Agricultural uses, rural-based businesses, and larger lot residential exurban subdivisions likely will be developed in this area and should occur in accordance with the Urban Fringe Development Standards for Wichita and Sedgwick County.
(5) Impact of the proposed development on community facilities: There will be minimal impact on public roads and no impact to water and sewer service.
MOTION: To approve subject staff recommendation.
GREENE moved, MILES seconded the motion, and it carried (11-0).
4.2 CON2020-00024: City Conditional Use for Vehicle Sales, Outdoor, on property zoned LC; generally located on the south side of West Central Avenue and west of North West Street (4231 West Central Avenue).
Lot 1, except the East 61.5 feet thereof, West City Addition, Wichita, Sedgwick County, Kansas. AND Lot 2, except the West 0.1feet thereof, Westex Addition, Wichita, Sedgwick County, Kansas.
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a “conditional use” to allow outdoor vehicle sales on property zoned Limited Commercial (LC). The site is located on the south side of West Central Avenue, 900 feet west of North West Street (4231 W. Central Avenue). The subject site is developed with a one-story masonry service repair building with two garage door openings on the north elevation. The building site has been operating as an automotive repair business for several years. Per the Unified Zoning Code (UZC), outdoor vehicle and equipment sales may be permitted with a conditional use in the LC zoning district.
The applicant’s site plan shows the existing commercial structure with customer and vehicle sales parking spaces marked. South of the building is a paved area approximately 50 feet deep by 80 wide with parking for employees. The lot dimensions are approximately 74 feet wide and 215 feet deep. The site has one drive access onto West Central Avenue in the middle of the property. The parking for the outdoor vehicle sales will use the east access drive and exit through the access drive on the property west of the site. There is a cross lot access agreement with the property owner to the east.
West Central Avenue is a five-lane arterial corridor. The north and south sides of the street are zoned LC developed with auto service businesses, retail and fast food restaurants. South of the project site is property zoned GO General Office and is developed with a dental laboratory. There is no residential zoning district that abuts the property.
There are used car lots on West Central Avenue located at 5601 W. Central Avenue and 6000 W. Central Avenue. There are no used car lots from the subject site east to North McLean Boulevard.
Outdoor vehicle and equipment sales uses are subject to the following supplementary use regulations control in UZC Article III, Section III-D.6.x. when located within the LC zoning district
12 as follows:
(1) Location shall be contiguous to a major Street as designated in the Transportation Plan adopted by the Governing Bodies, and as amended from time to time.
(2) Visual Screening of areas Adjacent to residential zoning districts shall be provided to protect adjacent properties from light, debris and noise and to preserve adjacent property values even when the change in use to Vehicle and Equipment Sales replaces a previous use that is of equal or greater intensity. In no case shall the screening be less than that required by Sec. IV- B.1-3.
(3) All Parking, Outdoor Storage and display areas shall be paved with concrete, asphalt or asphaltic concrete or any comparable hard surfacing material. Parking barriers shall be installed along all perimeter boundaries Abutting streets, except at driveway entrances or where fences are erected, to ensure that parked vehicles do not encroach onto public street right-of-way.
(4) The lighting shall be in compliance with the lighting requirements of Sec.IV-B.4. No string-type or search lighting shall be permitted.
(5) The noise levels shall be in compliance with the compatibility noise standards of Sec. IV-C.6. Outdoor speakers and sound amplification systems shall not be permitted.
(6) No repair work shall be conducted on site, except in an enclosed building, and further provided that no body or fender work is done.
(7) Only those signs permitted in the LC District shall be permitted on this site, except that no portable, flashing, moving or off-site signs shall be permitted and no streamers, banners, pennants, pinwheels, commercial flags, bunting or similar devices shall be permitted.
(8) There shall be no use of elevated platforms for the display of vehicles.
CASE HISTORY: The Westex Addition was in 1971 and the West City Addition was platted in 1976.
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: LC Fast Food Restaurant and an Auto Parts Store SOUTH: GO Dental Laboratory EAST: LC Retail strip center WEST: LC General Retail
PUBLIC SERVICES: West Central is currently a five-lane arterial carrying 22,884 vehicles on an average day between West Street and Anna. By 2030 the traffic volume is projected to increase to 24,019 average daily trips. Municipal sewer and water services are available to the site.
CONFORMANCE TO PLANS/POLICIES: The adopted Wichita-Sedgwick County Comprehensive Plan, the Community Investments Plan, identifies the site as within the Established Central Area - the downtown core and mature neighborhoods surrounding it in a roughly three-mile radius. The Plan encourages infill development within the Established Central Area that maximizes public investment in existing and planned infrastructure and services. The Future Growth Concept Map identifies the area “New Employment.” The Wichita: Places for People Plan https://www.wichita.gov/Planning/PlanningDocument/Walkable%20Development%20 Book.pdf
13 identifies the intersection of Central and West Streets as a “Community Core” which emphasize greater access for those commuting by car, but are also accessible by foot, bicycle, and transit. It is staff’s interpretation that the Community Core identified in the Wichita: Places for People Plan does not support the introduction of a new use in this location.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon information available prior to the public hearings and evaluating the conditions and uses of the surrounding neighborhood, staff believes the establishment of a car sales lot at this location would be introducing a new use in the Community Core. Therefore, staff is recommending the request be DENIED.
This recommendation of denial is based on the following findings:
1. The zoning, uses and character of the neighborhood West Central Avenue and South West Street are five-lane arterial streets with Limited Commercial zoning from West Street to I-235. Property south of the site is zoned GO General Office.
2. The suitability of the subject property for the uses to which it has been restricted: The property is zoned LC and has an operating auto repair shop, and could continue as such a use as well as broad range of other permitted commercial uses.
3. Extent to which removal of the restrictions will detrimentally affect nearby property: Vehicle sales on a site this size when developed with the conditional use, will introduce a new use not allowed by right in the arterial corridor at this location.
1. Conformance of the requested change to adopted or recognized Plans/Policies: The adopted Wichita-Sedgwick County Comprehensive Plan, the Community Investments Plan, identifies the site as within the Established Central Area and the Wichita: Places for People Plan identifies the site as being located in a Community Core.
If, in the opinion of the Planning Commission, the request is determined to be appropriate, the Planning Commission should adopt alternative findings supporting approval and approval should be subject to the following conditions:
1) The Conditional Use shall be limited to the sales of cars and pick-up (light) trucks. No sale or rental of trailers, boats, motorcycles/scooters, recreational vehicles or trucks larger than pick-ups are permitted. All conditions of the Unified Zoning Code, Section III-D.6.x, outdoor vehicle and equipment sales shall be in effect. No more than five (5) cars for sale will be allowed on the lot at one time.
2) Because the UZC’s definition of “vehicle repair limited” does not allow the outside repair or maintenance services of vehicles none shall be conducted on the site, unless a building is provided for this activity; UZC. Art. II, Sec.II-B.14.i. No outside storage of salvaged vehicles or vehicles waiting for repair shall be permitted in association with this use. No outside storage of parts, including tires, oil containers or any similar type of receptacles for new or used petroleum products.
3) All improvements to the property must be finished before car sales is permitted. Those improvements shall include, but not limited to, clearly marked customer and employee parking and the display area, proposed lighting and a solid fenced trash receptacle area.
4) The applicant shall submit a scaled revised site plan for review and approval by the Planning Director, prior to the selling of any cars or light trucks. The site plan will include, but not be
14
limited to, internal circulation that will remain open at all time to allow access, required screening along the south property line, parking barriers along the north property and west property lines, area designated for display of cars, customer and employee parking, any existing or proposed signs, existing or proposed lighting, landscaping plan along the south property line and location of a fenced trash receptacle. The site will be developed according to the revised site plan.
5) The selling of vehicles is subject to the supplemental use regulations of UZC Section III D. 6. X. pertaining to vehicle and equipment sales in the LC zoning district.
6) A conditional use amendment shall be required for any changes to these conditions.
7) Off-street parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Article IV, Sec. IV-A of the UZC. No vehicles for sale shall be displayed in required off-street parking spaces. No parking is allowed on unpaved surfaces on the lot.
8) The site shall be developed and operated in compliance with all federal, state, and local rules and regulations.
9) If the Zoning Administrator finds that there is a violation of any of the conditions of the conditional use, the Zoning Administrator, in addition to enforcing the other remedies set forth in Article VIII of the Unified Zoning Code, may, with the concurrence of the Planning Director, declare that the conditional use is null and void.
KATHY MORGAN, PLANNING STAFF, presented the staff report and stated that she would answer any specific questions from the Commission members.
MILES: Does any auto repair business have to have a conditional use if they sell cars that are abandoned?
DAVE YEAROUT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER: Any business that sells used cars is required by state law to have an automobile dealer license and that triggers the requirement for the conditional use.
NICKS: Do both of the businesses referenced here on West Central repair and sell used cars?
MORGAN: No. PAR is an auto repair business only and does not have a conditional use for used car sales. The new business will be doing detailing and upholstery. They are applying for the conditional use for the used car sales.
NICKS: Would banner signage be allowed at this location? What about selling motorcycles?
MORGAN: Those would be code enforcement issues after the Conditional Use is approved.
FOSTER: How many off-street parking stalls are required for this business?
MORGAN: According to the parking requirements, one space for every 333 square feet, they would have to provide four spaces.
JEREMIA LEATHERS, APPLICANT: I have a full time job and the used car sales would be strictly part time. I will be using social media to advertise and I would use the location to meet potential customers. I am leasing some of this space from a partner that will be doing upholstery,
15 window tinting, and custom audio installation. I would be willing to limit the number of display spaces to four cars.
GREENE: What spaces will be used for display?
LEATHERS: Spaces 1, 2, 3, and 6 according to the site plan.
DUXLER: Will you be able to comply with the conditions set out if we approve the conditional use?
LEATHERS: Yes. My lease agreement with my business partner only allows for four cars to be displayed.
FLORENCE: What model range of vehicles will you be selling?
LEATHERS: In order to meet my price point, under $10,000 with low mileage. Probably 2005 and up.
CINDY HOUSTON, OWNER OF GARTENS MUSIC, 4233 WEST CENTRAL AVENUE: I own building to the west and I am concerned about the traffic coming through our lot and creating safety issues for our parking both front and back.
J JOHNSON: Is there a cross lot easement?
HOUSTON: I don’t have a cross lot agreement to allow use of my access point. Customers and delivery trucks are probably using my drive as an entrance and exit for those businesses.
FOSTER: Would you prefer there be a barrier between the two parking areas?
HOUSTON: That would be an option.
GREENE: Please show the photo looking south at the drive between the music store and the upholstery shop. Where would the property line be?
YEAROUT: It appears that the property line is against the music store building.
LEATHERS: We understood that there was a cross lot access, but would be open to changing the traffic flow or putting up a barrier.
WARREN: Just to make sure, you would be okay with either option?
LEATHERS: Yes.
FOSTER: A barrier is a good idea but may hinder access to the east parking space on the east end of the music store.
MCKAY: Is there a cross lot agreement?
MORGAN: From the aerial and meeting Mr. Leathers on-site, it appeared to me that because the parking surfaces were abutted that there would have been a cross lot access. The GIS map doesn’t provide that kind of information. I apologize for making my statement to Mr. Leathers more clear.
16
WARREN: If there is not a cross lot agreement, the music store would be allowed to put a barrier. That is not our call.
FOSTER: Ms. Houston, do you have any documentation that there is or isn’t a cross lot agreement? This area may be too old for that to have happened.
HOUSTON: I have no knowledge of anything in my records from when we purchased the building in 2000.
DOOL: The drawing indicates there is a curb cut in front of the subject property. Is there a curb cut in front of the music store?
MORGAN: Yes.
MCKAY: I have a concern about if there is a cross lot access or not and not knowing where the property line is.
YEAROUT: It appears from GIS that the property line is the east wall of the music store building.
GREENE: It appears that the movement is on his property.
FOSTER: The arrows on the site plan should indicate the traffic pattern should have a left turn at the corner of the building to direct traffic around the back of the building and then north to Central. I would make a recommendation for a change to reduce the number of display cars to four to match the lease agreement. Also, looking at the pictures, this property has a number of cars out front that give the impression of a lot of business activity and I don’t see this as being detrimental.
Motion to approve the conditional use for vehicle sales with the following conditions:
1. The Conditional Use shall be limited to the sales of cars and pick-up (light) trucks. No sale or rental of trailers, boats, motorcycles/scooters, recreational vehicles or trucks larger than pick-ups are permitted. All conditions of the Unified Zoning Code, Section III-D.6.x, outdoor vehicle and equipment sales shall be in effect. No more than four (4) cars for sale will be allowed on the lot at one time.
2. Because the UZC’s definition of “vehicle repair limited” does not allow the outside repair or maintenance services of vehicles none shall be conducted on the site, unless a building is provided for this activity; UZC. Art. II, Sec.II-B.14.i. No outside storage of salvaged vehicles or vehicles waiting for repair shall be permitted in association with this use. No outside storage of parts, including tires, oil containers or any similar type of receptacles for new or used petroleum products.
3. All improvements to the property must be finished before car sales is permitted. Those improvements shall include, but not limited to, clearly marked customer and employee parking and the display area, proposed lighting and a solid fenced trash receptacle area.
4. The applicant shall submit a scaled revised site plan for review and approval by the Planning Director, prior to the selling of any cars or light trucks. The site plan will include, but not be limited to, internal circulation that reflects exiting traffic to circle around the building and that will remain open at all time to allow access, required screening along the south property line, parking barriers along the north property and west property lines, area designated for display of cars, customer and employee parking, any existing or proposed signs, existing or proposed
17
lighting, landscaping plan along the south property line and location of a fenced trash receptacle. The site will be developed according to the revised site plan.
5. The selling of vehicles is subject to the supplemental use regulations of UZC Section III D. 6. X. pertaining to vehicle and equipment sales in the LC zoning district.
6. A conditional use amendment shall be required for any changes to these conditions.
7. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Article IV, Sec. IV-A of the UZC. No vehicles for sale shall be displayed in required off-street parking spaces. No parking is allowed on unpaved surfaces on the lot.
8. The site shall be developed and operated in compliance with all federal, state, and local rules and regulations.
9. If the Zoning Administrator finds that there is a violation of any of the conditions of the conditional use, the Zoning Administrator, in addition to enforcing the other remedies set forth in Article VIII of the Unified Zoning Code, may, with the concurrence of the Planning Director, declare that the conditional use is null and void.
FOSTER moved, GREENE seconded the motion, and it carried (11-0)
______
______
Other Matters/Adjournment
Planning Commission adjourned.
State of Kansas )
Sedgwick County ) SS
I, Scott Wadle, Secretary of the Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing copy of the minutes of the meeting of the Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Commission, held on , is a true and correct copy of the minutes officially approved by such Commission.
Given under my hand and official seal this ______day of ______, 2020.
______Scott Wadle, Secretary Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
18
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.2
STAFF REPORT MAPC August 6, 2020
CASE NUMBER: CON2020-00026
OWNER/APPLICANT: AGV Corporation – P. John Eck, President (Owner); M & L Land Company, LLC – Marsha Meyersick, Co-Manager (Owner)
REQUEST: Conditional Use to permit Oil and Gas Drilling
CURRENT ZONING: RR Rural Residential (“RR”)
SITE SIZE: 243.52 acres
LOCATION: Generally located on the north side of Kansas Highway 254-61st Street North to the east of North 127th Street East (BoCC #1)
PROPOSED USE: Oil Drilling BACKGROUND: The applicants have requested a Conditional Use for “oil and gas drilling” within an area of 243.52 acres of property zoned RR Rural Residential (“RR”) generally located north of K-254 Highway and east of North 127th Street East. The Wichita-Sedgwick County Unified Zoning Code (“UZC”) requires a Conditional Use for such use in Rural Residential properties. The applicant’s information indicates the area will be accessed by a sand and gravel frontage road off of 127th Street East on the south, and by access from East 69th Street North on the north.
According to the packet provided by the applicants, the new operation is, in essence, a reworking of the existing oil field with a total of proposed six new wells to be drilled. Specific locations are identified where the new wells will be drilled, with notation that the operations will be in compliance with all requirements of the Kansas Corporation Commission, which regulates all oil and gas operations within the State of Kansas. The details of the manner in which the operations will occur, coupled with the ongoing management of the facilities are also discussed in the attached packet of information.
The RR zoned subject site is surrounded by RR zoned lands being used for agriculture, active oil wells or plugged and abandoned oil wells. There are single-family residences along North 127th Street East; and some single-family residences along the north side of East 69th Street North. South of the site, across K-254, there is agricultural land, active oil wells, plugged and abandoned wells, (both with accessory structures and equipment) and a water well. West of the site, across 127th Street East, is agricultural land and plugged and abandoned oil wells with accessory structures and equipment.
CASE HISTORY: The property was zoned RR when the County adopted county-wide zoning in 1985. Oil drilling on the subject site may have begun in 1930-1932. There are numerous previous cases regarding oil drilling activity on the same property.
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE:
NORTH: RR Agriculture land, plugged and abandoned wells, oil well SOUTH: RR Agriculture land, plugged and abandoned oil wells, oil wells EAST: RR Agriculture land, plugged and abandoned wells, oil wells WEST: RR Agriculture land, plugged and abandoned wells, oil wells, single-family residence
PUBLIC SERVICES: K-254 (61st Street North) is a four-lane Kansas State Highway, with a wide grassy median separating the east-west lanes. 127th Street East is a two-lane unpaved Lincoln Township section-line road on the north side of K-254. The sand and gravel frontage road that connects the subject site to 127th is located approximately 270 feet north of K-254. The subject site is located within the service area of Sedgwick County Rural Water District No. 1. There is no public sewer service available to the subject site. Other utilities, such as electricity are or may be available to the subject site.
CONFORMANCE TO PLANS/POLICIES: The “2035 Wichita Future Growth Map” categorizes the site and the area around it as “rural.” The rural functional land use category
CON2020-00026 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 2 includes land outside the 2030 urban growth areas for Wichita and the small cities, and is intended to accommodate agricultural uses and rural based uses that are no more “offensive” than those agricultural uses commonly found in Sedgwick County, and predominately larger lot residential exurban subdivisions. Oil and gas drilling are activities that have occurred in rural Sedgwick County prior to County zoning in 1985 and prior to the 1996 UZC. As such, the proposed use is in compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon information available prior to the public hearings, planning staff recommends that the request be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions:
A. The Conditional Use permits “oil and gas drilling” that is developed and operated in substantial compliance with the approved site plan and any associated documents, licenses or permits detailing drilling and completion activities used to obtain Conditional Use approval. B. Any new oil wells, disposal wells, oil storage tanks, water and oil separators, pumping units, a water tank at the disposal well, electric generators or other oil production equipment located on the site after the final approval by the MAPC or the governing body must conform to the setbacks per the Unified Zoning Code. C. The applicant shall obtain all applicable permits, licenses and/or inspections from Sedgwick County, the State of Kansas or the federal government, including but not limited to, the Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Building and Construction Department, Sedgwick County Environmental Resources, Sedgwick County Fire Department, Sedgwick County Public Works (including, but not limited to any required drainage plans), the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and the Kansas Corporation Commission. Prior to moving equipment into Sedgwick County, the applicant shall obtain any applicable permits required to move or transport oversized equipment on Sedgwick County public right-of-way. D. If the Zoning Administrator finds that there is a violation of any of the provisions or conditions of the Conditional Use, the Zoning Administrator, in addition to enforcing the other remedies set forth in Article VIII of the Unified Zoning Code, may, with the concurrence of the Planning Director, declare the Conditional Use null and void.
This recommendation is based on the following findings:
1. The zoning, uses and character of the neighborhood: The RR zoned subject site is surrounded by RR zoned lands being used for agriculture, active oil wells or plugged and abandoned oil wells. There are single-family residences along North 127th Street East; and some single-family residences along the north side of East 69th Street North. South of the site, across K-254, there is agricultural land, active oil wells, plugged and abandoned wells, (both with accessory structures and equipment) and a water well. West of the site, across 127th Street East, is agricultural land and plugged and abandoned oil wells with accessory structures and equipment.
2. The suitability of the subject property for the uses to which it has been restricted: The subject site is zoned RR, which permits agricultural activities, larger lot residential uses and a limited set of nonresidential uses by right. A Kansas Geological Survey map shows the
CON2020-00026 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 3 subject site to be located over the Greenwich Pool, an oil holding formation that was discovered 1929-1930. Oil production from the Greenwich Pool has continued to the present. The subject site/area has been used for oil well drilling and production prior to County zoning in 1985 and prior to the 1996 UZC. The current UZC permits consideration for approval of gas and oil drilling through the Conditional Use process in the RR zoning district.
3. Extent to which removal of the restrictions will detrimentally affect nearby property: The subject site and the area around it are located over the Greenwich Pool, an established oil producing formation. The Greenwich Pool was discovered 1929-1930 and has been an active oil producing site since then. The area is also actively used for agricultural. The proposed oil well is not out of character with the area.
4. Length of time the property has been vacant as currently zoned: The subject property is currently used in conformance with the Rural Residential zoning classification, with agricultural uses and existing oils wells.
5. Conformance of the requested change to the adopted or recognized Comprehensive Plan and policies: The “2035 Wichita Future Growth Map” categorizes the site and the area around it as “rural.” The rural functional land use category includes land outside the 2030 urban growth areas for Wichita and the small cities, and is intended to accommodate agricultural uses and rural based uses that are no more offensive than those agricultural uses commonly found in Sedgwick County, and predominately larger lot residential exurban subdivisions. Oil and gas drilling are activities that have occurred in rural Sedgwick County prior to County zoning in 1985 and prior to the 1996 UZC. As such, the proposed use is in compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
6. Relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare as compared to the loss in value or the hardship imposed upon the applicant: Approval would bring the site into compliance with the UZC and provide the public with additional oil reserves. Denial would presumably be an economic loss to the mineral rights owners.
7. Impact of the proposed development on community facilities: The conditions of approval of this Conditional Use and other regulations should minimize impacts on community facilities.
Staff Report Attachments: 1. Applicant Narrative 2. Site Plan 3. Neighbor opposition letters
CON2020-00026 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 4
Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Department Attn: David Yearout 271 W. 3rd Street- Suite 201 Wichita, KS 67202
July 21, 2020
To Mr. Yearout and the Planning Department, We are writing today in response to the notice we received concerning an application to change zoning and land regulations controlling land that is surrounding our rural residence on three sides. (Case No: CON2020-00026) The applicants are seeking a zone change to expand oil drilling and production that is directly bordering us to the south, north and west. (see attached map, our property is highlighted in orange) We are adamantly opposed to a re-zoning of this land for the following reasons: 1) Health risk to our young family of six. A). Cancer risk increases by eight times. A 2018 study by the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus states, "We found that air pollutant concentrations increased with proximity to an oil and gas facility, as did health risks," the study said. "Acute hazard indices for neurological, hematological and developmental health effects indicate that populations living within 152 meters (500 feet) of an oil and gas facility could experience these health effects from inhalation exposures to benzene and alkanes." The cancer risk estimate of 8.3 per 10,000 for populations living within 500 feet of an oil and gas facility exceeded the U.S. EPA's 1 in 10,000 upper threshold, according to study published recently in the journal Environmental Science & Technology. (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180409103920.htm) This is only one of multiple studies we found. Benzene gas is a known carcinogen and we can show more research proving an increased risk of cancer for those living within a mile of oil wells.
B) Residents near oil drilling regularly have an increase in headaches, migraines, dizziness, nosebleeds respiratory problems like asthma and coughing, eye, nose, and throat irritation, nausea, trouble sleeping, and fatigue, as well as infertility. (https://earthworks.org/issues/oil_and_gas_health_effects/)
2) Noxious odors from methane gas and noise from running wells and trucks Aside from the health risks briefly mentioned above, there is a substantial effect on the quality of life for those who live near oil wells. Having to constantly smell dangerous fumes and hear the machinery and trucks going to and from the sites will be a significant disruption to our life. When you consider that generally spring winds are from the south/southwest, and winter winds from the north, our property will always be at risk for fumes and smells.
3) The potential of lost land value.
“In April 2014, a Texas jury awarded just under $3 million to a family whose health and lives were turned upside down by the emissions coming from dozens of wells that had been drilled near their home. The verdict, which compensated the family for pain and suffering from illnesses linked with exposure to oil production and fracking chemicals, also included $275,000 for the loss in market value of their property caused by all the drilling.” “Denver Realtor Adam Cox wrote in a column in the Colorado Statesman that “potential buyers balk at buying homes near a drilling site, even though that’s often where the discounted homes are” because they are so close to oil and gas activity. Similarly, he said, homeowners near drilling sites “often have to sell at significantly lower prices than when originally purchased due to the oil and gas industry neighbors.” (https://www.resource-media.org/drilling-vs-the-american-dream- fracking-impacts-on-property-rights-and-home-values/)
4) Fertility risk to our breeding business and the potential health effects on our livestock, pets, wildlife and game.
“Bamberger and Oswald (2015) longitudinally investigated 21 cases related to animal health based on qualitative interviews. The animals lived within two miles of an intensively drilled region across five US states, with some animals directly exposed to drilling fluids and wastewater. In both companion and livestock animals, the most commonly reported health impacts were found in reproductive, neurologic, gastrointestinal, and respiratory systems, along with decreased growth and milk production. Reported symptoms were largely unchanged over the course of the study.” (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344296/)
5) Potential for well water contamination. “One method of producing more oil or gas from old fields is to inject water or brine into the producing formation to increase the pressure and move the oil or gas to wells. Some oil or gas fields are "leaking," however, and once the pressure is increased, the injected fluid or oil finds avenues of escape to other formations, such as through abandoned boreholes or corroded well casings. Some shallow producing areas that contain many abandoned wells spaced a few hundred feet apart have created an unmanageable leakage problem. Every old abandoned oil or gas well that is not cemented-in may provide an avenue for saline water, oil, or gas to escape into the nearest aquifer and contaminate the system. It would be wise to verify that the home being purchased is not near an old oil or gas field.” (https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/gw_ruralhomeowner/) See also: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344296/
For these reasons, we urge you to deny the rezoning of this property from rural residential. As shown in your notice, land zoned rural residential is the most restrictive of all the zoning districts for an expansion such as this. There are at least eighteen other districts between rural residential zones to less restrictive general industrial zones that gradually allow for such an industry. This land surrounding us was zoned rural residential when we bought our property and then eventually built our residence here. Having live oil wells in operation so close to our residence could prove to be greatly detrimental to our health and livelihood. Since this property adjoins us on three sides, our property has the greatest potential for negative impact. Please strongly consider these negative effects on the families that live near this property and your response if a similar proposal was being made in your neighborhood. We trust that you all will be wise and fair when making your decision.
Sincerely,
Rusty and Lesli Cryer 316-204-4909 316-204-4919 6265 N. 143rd St. East Wichita, KS 67228
Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Department Attn: David Yearout 271 W. 3rd Street- Suite 201 Wichita, KS 67202
July 27, 2020
To Mr. Yearout and the Planning Department, We are responding to the notice we received concerning an application to change zoning and land regulations controlling land that is surrounding our rural residence on three sides. (Case No: CON2020- 00026) The applicants are seeking a zone change to expand oil drilling and production that is directly bordering us to the south, north and west. (see attached map, our property is highlighted in orange) When we bought this property as an investment in 2010, with future plans to build a retirement home on it, it was zoned “RURAL RESIDENTIAL”. We fear that if oil wells are allowed to be drilled right next to our property the land value will decrease significantly. In addition, we oppose the rezoning due to the fact that studies have shown there is an increase in cancer rates for people living within five hundred feet of oil wells. Livestock and pets can also be adversly affected as well. Fracking and other such oil/gas procedures can adversly affect the ground water. Our well could be potentially contaminated. For these reasons, we strongly urge your team to DENY this proposal for rezoning.
Sincerely,
Phil & Linda Teakell 191 Laird Creek Rd. Conner, MT 59827 (406)531-6205
AGV CORP. Exhibit 1 Conditional Use Application
Al'"
78
jS` aN
Exhibit 1
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.3
STAFF REPORT MAPC August 6, 2020 DAB IV August 3, 2020
CASE NUMBER: ZON2020-00007
APPLICANT/AGENT: JBL Inc.
REQUEST: TF-3 Two-Family Residential
CURRENT ZONING: SF-5 Single-Family Residential
SITE SIZE: 15 acres
LOCATION: Located approximately 1,800 feet south of West 47th Street South and east of South Seneca Street
PROPOSED USE: Duplex development
ZON2020-00007 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 1 BACKGROUND: The applicant/owner is requesting the rezoning of approximately 15 acres of Sycamore Pond Addition (approximately 65 lots) from SF-5 Single-Family Residential (SF-5) to TF-3 Two Family Residential (TF- 3). The property is currently undeveloped.
The property on the south side of the subject property is SF-5 and is developed with single-family residences. North of the site is a 21-acre undeveloped tract of SF-5 zoned property. West of the subject site are partially developed SF-5 lots located in the Sycamore Pond Addition. East of the site is the Georgia Pacific Addition which is zoned Limited Industrial (LI).
CASE HISTORY: Sycamore Pond Addition was platted in June 2006 as a single-family residential subdivision.
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: SF-5 Unplatted and Undeveloped SOUTH: SF-5 Single-family residences EAST: LI Georgia Pacific Addition WEST: SF-5 Partially developed single-family residential lots
PUBLIC SERVICES: West 50th Street is a paved local collector street with access onto South Seneca. Municipal services are available to be extended as the subdivision develops.
CONFORMANCE TO PLANS/POLICIES: The Wichita-Sedgwick County Community Investments Plan, identifies the area in which the site is located as Wichita Urban Growth Area. The site is located in an area in which City expansion and extension of municipal services and infrastructure should be focused for residential growth and has the potential to be developed by 2035 based upon population growth and market trends. The uses envisioned for redevelopment in this area include a variety of residential types including single-family dwellings, duplexes and multi-family residential. The area is also located in the South Wichita/Haysville Plan which promotes future residential and commercial development. This area is located outside of the Wichita: Places for People Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the information available at the time the staff report was completed, staff recommends APPROVAL of the request, as submitted. This recommendation is based on the following findings:
1. The zoning, uses and character of the neighborhood: The surrounding neighborhood is zoned for predominantly residential uses. Sycamore Pond Addition encompasses 36 + acres.
2. The suitability of the subject property for the uses to which it has been restricted: The property is presently zoned SF-5 Single Family Residential, and the property could be developed with new single-family dwellings; however, the Community Investments Plan encourages a variety of housing types, including duplexes.
3. Extent to which removal of the restrictions will detrimentally affect nearby property: TF-3 zoning will compatible with the surrounding zoning districts.
4. Length of time the property has been vacant as currently zoned: The property was platted in June 2006. No development has begun on the site.
5. Conformance of the requested change to the adopted or recognized Comprehensive Plan and policies: The Wichita-Sedgwick County Community Investments Plan, identifies the area in which the site is located as Wichita Urban Growth Area. The site is located in an area in which City expansion and extension of municipal services and infrastructure should be focused for residential growth and has the potential to be developed by 2035 based upon population growth and market trends. The uses envisioned for redevelopment in this area include a variety of residential types including single-family dwellings, duplexes and multi-family residential.
ZON2020-00007 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 2 6. Impact of the proposed development on community facilities: Development of the property would not have any impact on community facilities or resources. All public improvements are proximal to the property.
Attachment: Zoning Map Subdivision and Zone change area map
ZON2020-00007 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 3
ZON2020-00007 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 4
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.4
STAFF REPORT MAPC August 6, 2020
CASE NUMBER: ZON2020-00024
APPLICANT/AGENT: Danny Beck; Trustee Eldon LeRoy Beck Trust (owner) Steve Miller (Agent)
REQUEST: TF-3 Two-Family Residential
CURRENT ZONING: SF-20 Single-Family Residential
SITE SIZE: 4.21 acres
LOCATION: Generally located east of South Greenwich Road and north of East Pawnee Road (11510 East Pawnee Road)
PROPOSED USE: Duplexes
ZON2020-00024 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 1 BACKGROUND: The applicant/owner is requesting the rezoning of the subject property from SF-20 Single Family Residential (SF-20) to TF-3 Two Family Residential (TF-3) in order to redevelop the property with proposed duplexes. The property is located east of South Greenwich Road and north of East Pawnee Road.
The subject property currently includes two structures, but a site plan provided by the applicant indicates that 12 lots are being proposed on the property. The subject property is approximately 187,000 square feet, with 1,115 linear feet of frontage along South Ellison Street and a depth from Ellison Street of approximately 164 feet. The TF-3 zoning district requires a 25-foot front setback, a 20-foot rear setback, and a minimum lot area of 3,000 square feet per unit for duplexes. There is adequate land area to meet the develop requirements under the Unified Zoning Code (UZC).
The neighborhood is a mature, residential area within the unincorporated portion of Sedgwick County. The properties north, south, east, and west of the subject site are zoned SF-20 and are developed as single- family homes. The neighborhood was all platted and developed in the late 1940’s and early 1950’s in the rural area of the County. The intersection of Greenwich Road and Pawnee Road has LC Limited Commercial zoning, which was established by Sedgwick County action in the late 1950’s when certain intersections were given commercial classifications. There closest TF-3 zoning is approximately one half mile to the west within the new Cedar Lake Addition west of Greenwich Road, and in the Bella Casa 3rd Addition on the west side of South 127th Street East.
CASE HISTORY: The subject site was platted as Lot 2, Spurrier’s La Homa Acres Addition to Sedgwick County, Kansas on September 14, 1948. There are no other zoning actions of record for the property.
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: SF-20 Single-family residences SOUTH: SF-20 Single-family residences EAST: SF-20 Single-family residences WEST: SF-20 Single-family residences
PUBLIC SERVICES: Development of the property as proposed on the attached site plan presents challenges. Sedgwick County Public Works has indicated that South Ellison Street in this location does not include enough street right-of-way, and that the street will need to be built to a public standard. Sedgwick County Public Works indicated these issues would be resolved during the platting process as long as the applicant submits a valid petition for street paving. A replatting will be required to obtain building permits.
City of Wichita water and sewer utilities are available to the site. Wichita Public Works has indicated the waterline will need to be replaced or the applicant will need to get the Fire Department to sign off on allowing fire hydrants on a 6” waterline. The applicant will also be required to submit a study on the sanitary sewer utilities to ensure capacity is adequate. Wichita Public Works indicated these issues would need to be resolved during the platting process or prior to construction.
CONFORMANCE TO PLANS/POLICIES: The Wichita-Sedgwick County Community Investments Plan, 2035 Future Growth Map identifies the area in which the site as Residential. This category is described as follows: “Encompasses areas that reflect the full diversity of residential development intensities and types typically found in large urban municipalities.” The concept of allowing development of duplexes with residential areas is a stated goal of the plan. As such, this request is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
ZON2020-00024 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the information available at the time the staff report was completed, staff recommends APPROVAL of the request, as submitted, subject to a requirement to replat prior to obtaining any building permits.
This recommendation is based on the following findings:
1. The zoning, uses and character of the neighborhood: The neighborhood is a mature, residential area within the unincorporated portion of Sedgwick County. The properties north, south, east, and west of the subject site are zoned SF-20 and are developed as single-family homes. The neighborhood was all platted and developed in the late 1940’s and early 1950’s in the rural area of the County. The intersection of Greenwich Road and Pawnee Road has LC Limited Commercial zoning, which was established by Sedgwick County action in the late 1950’s when certain intersections were given commercial classifications. There closest TF-3 zoning is approximately one half mile to the west within the new Cedar Lake Addition west of Greenwich Road, and in the Bella Casa 3rd Addition on the west side of South 127th Street East.
2. The suitability of the subject property for the uses to which it has been restricted: The property is presently zoned SF-20 Single Family Residential and the property could be developed with a new single-family dwelling.
3. Extent to which removal of the restrictions will detrimentally affect nearby property: Two platted additions relatively close to the subject property include lots zoned TF-3. The rezoning of the parcel to TF-3 will not detrimentally affect nearby properties.
4. Length of time the property has been vacant as currently zoned: The subject property currently includes two structures, but is mostly vacant. The length of time the property has been undeveloped is unknown.
5. Conformance of the requested change to the adopted or recognized Comprehensive Plan and policies: The Wichita-Sedgwick County Community Investments Plan, 2035 Future Growth Map identifies the area in which the site as Residential. This category is described as follows: “Encompasses areas that reflect the full diversity of residential development intensities and types typically found in large urban municipalities.” The concept of allowing development of duplexes with residential areas is a stated goal of the plan. As such, this request is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
6. Impact of the proposed development on community facilities: Development of the property as proposed on the attached site plan presents challenges. Sedgwick County Public Works has indicated that South Ellison Street in this location does not include enough street right-of-way, and that the street will need to be built to a public standard. Sedgwick County Public Works indicated these issues would be resolved during the platting process as long as the applicant submits a valid petition for street paving. A replatting will be required to obtain building permits.
City of Wichita water and sewer utilities are available to the site. Wichita Public Works has indicated the waterline will need to be replaced or the applicant will need to get the Fire Department to sign off on allowing fire hydrants on a 6” waterline. The applicant will also be required to submit a study on the sanitary sewer utilities to ensure capacity is adequate. Wichita Public Works indicated these issues would need to be resolved during the platting process or prior to construction.
ZON2020-00024 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 3 Staff Report Attachments: 1. Aerial Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Land Use Map 4. Site Plan 5. Photos 6. Neighbor comments
ZON2020-00024 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 4
ZON2020-00024 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 5
ZON2020-00024 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 6
ZON2020-00024 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 7
ZON2020-00024 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 8 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.5 STAFF REPORT MAPC – August 6, 2020 DAB III – August 5, 2020
CASE NUMBER: ZON2020-000025
APPLICANT/AGENT Nguyen Nuot Van & Ly Ngoc Thi Nguyen (Owner) K.E. Miller Engineering, P.A. (Agent)
REQUEST: LC Limited Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: SF-5 Single-family Residential
SITE SIZE: 0.189 acres
LOCATION: Generally located south of East Pawnee Avenue and west of South Hillside Avenue (2438 South El Rancho Road)
PROPOSED USE: To build a commercial building on the site
ZON2020-00025 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 1 BACKGROUND: This application was filed to rezone the subject property from SF-5 Single Family Residential (SF-5) to LC Limited Commercial (LC) in order to build a commercial building on the site. The site is generally located south of East Pawnee Avenue and west of South Hillside Avenue and is addressed 2438 South El Rancho Road. The lot has an existing single-family home. The site does not appear to meet the screening standards and will need to come into compliance if this rezoning is approved. Rezoning the site to LC allows for a mixture of residential, public/civic, and commercial uses as outlines in the Unified Zoning Code (UZC).
The existing building is listed on the Sedgwick County Appraiser’s Office records as being a single-family detached dwelling. No information was submitted by the applicant or agent of the proposed uses of the property beyond a desire to build a commercial building on the site.
The neighbor is mixed in uses. The properties to the south and west are zoned SF-5 Single-Family Residential and developed with single-family residences. Property to the north and east of the site is zoned LC Limited Commercial and developed with an auto store, a parking lot, and other commercial uses.
CASE HISTORY: The property was platted at Block 1, Pawnee Ranch Addition, Sedgwick County, Kansas, on June 14, 1947. There is no other zoning actions shown for the subject property since 2000. The applicant has submitted a vacation request for some utility easements on property to the north.
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE:
North: LC Auto Store South: SF-5 Single-Family Residential East: LC Strip Commercial West: SF-5 Single-Family Residential
PUBLIC SERVICES: South El Rancho is a two-lane, local street. All municipal services are available for the property.
CONFORMANCE TO PLANS/POLICIES: The adopted 2035 Wichita Future Growth Concept Map of the Wichita-Sedgwick County Comprehensive Plan, the Community Investments Plan identifies the area in which the site as Residential. This category is described as follows: “Encompasses areas that reflect the full diversity of residential development intensities and types typically found in large urban municipalities.” The subject property is also located within the Established Central Area (ECA) of the City of Wichita.
This subject property is adjacent to commercial land owned by the applicant who is desiring to expand the commercial redevelopment, which is considered appropriate for this area and would support the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the categories applicable to the site. The location does not support new residential use and, subject to the recommended conditions, this case is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the information available at the time the staff report was prepared it is recommended that the request for LC Limited Commercial zoning be APPROVED, subject to the establishment of a Protective Overlay (PO #353) to read as follows:
1. Proposed Uses: The subject property shall be limited to the following uses: All uses permitted within the “LC” Limited Commercial Zoning District with the following exceptions: Manufactured Home; Cemetery; Correctional Placement Residence, Limited and General; Recycling Collection Station, Public and Private; Marine Facility, Recreational; Monument Sales; Nightclub in the City; Pawn Shop; Sexually Oriented Business in the City; Tavern or Drinking Establishment; Teen Club in the City; Vehicle Repair, Limited;
ZON2020-00025 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 2 Asphalt or Concrete Plant, Limited and General; Recycling Collection Station; Reverse Vending Machine; Event Center; and Recreation And Entertainment (Indoor). Restaurants that serve liquor can be developed and may serve liquor, as long as food is the primary service of the establishment.
2. Signage shall be per the Wichita City Sign Code, except all signs shall be monument style and limited to 12 feet in height. Portable signs, off-site signs, banners, string pennants and the like shall not be permitted, except for a banner sign permitted for 30 days from the opening of business.
3. All outdoor lighting sources shall employ cut-off luminaries to minimize light trespass and glare. The site shall share similar or consistent parking lot lighting elements (i.e., fixtures, poles, and lamps, and etc.), and the height of light poles shall be limited to 15 feet within 200 feet of abutting residential-zoned property. Extensive use of backlit canopies and neon or fluorescent tube lighting on buildings is not permitted.
4. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from ground level view per the Unified Zoning Code.
5. Trash receptacles, loading docks, outdoor storage, and loading areas shall be appropriately screened, with similar materials to the main building, to reasonably hide them from ground view.
6. A site plan shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Planning prior to the issuance of building permits.
7. Prior to publishing the ordinance establishing the zone change, the applicants shall record a document with the Register of Deeds indicating that this tract includes special conditions for development on this property.
This recommendation is based on the following findings:
1. The zoning, uses and character of the neighborhood: The neighbor is mixed in uses. The properties to the south and west are zoned SF-5 Single-Family Residential and developed with single-family residences. Property to the north and east of the site is zoned LC Limited Commercial and developed with an auto store, a parking lot, and other commercial uses.
2. The suitability of the subject property for the uses to which it has been restricted: The lot has an existing single-family home and is presently classified as a residential use. LC zoning exists to the north and east and the site could be granted LC zoning without being out of context with the surrounding area.
3. Extent to which removal of the restrictions will detrimentally affect nearby property: Approval of LC zoning would allow a wider range of uses to be constructed on the property. The proposed Protective Overlay will mitigate any negative impacts.
4. Length of time the property has been vacant as currently zoned: The subject property has been used and improved for many years.
5. Relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare as compared to the loss in value or the hardship imposed upon the applicant: Approval of the request will presumably expand commercial opportunities for the neighborhood which is generally considered a gain to the public welfare. Denial would presumably represent a loss of economic opportunity to the applicant and/or land owner.
ZON2020-00025 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 3 6. Conformance of the requested change to the adopted or recognized Comprehensive Plan and policies: The adopted 2035 Wichita Future Growth Concept Map of the Wichita-Sedgwick County Comprehensive Plan, the Community Investments Plan identifies the area in which the site as Residential. This category is described as follows: “Encompasses areas that reflect the full diversity of residential development intensities and types typically found in large urban municipalities.” The subject property is also located within the Established Central Area (ECA) of the City of Wichita.
This subject property is adjacent to commercial land owned by the applicant who is desiring to expand the commercial redevelopment, which is considered appropriate for this area and would support the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the categories applicable to the site. The location does not support new residential use and, subject to the recommended conditions, this case is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
7. Impact of the proposed development on community facilities: Existing municipal facilities are already available to the property.
Attachments: 1. Area Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Land Use Map 4. Site Plan 5. Photos
ZON2020-00025 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 4
ZON2020-00025 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 5
ZON2020-00025 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 6
ZON2020-00025 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Page 7
AGENDA ITEM: X
WICHITA-SEDGWICK COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: June 24, 2020
TO: Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
FROM: Mary M. Hunt, Principal Planner – Advanced Plans
SUBJECT: DER2020-00004: Sedgwick County Capital Improvement Program 2021- 2025 Recommendation
Background: Sedgwick County Public Works Department prepares an annual Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for the upcoming five year period. On Thursday, July 23, 2020 the Advanced Plans Committee recommended the Sedgwick County CIP be included on the August 6, 2020 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission agenda. Mr. Jim Weber, PE, Director of Sedgwick County Public Works, and Valerie Kaster, Project Services Manager of Facilities Maintenance will present the CIP for 2021 – 2025 to the Commission. As stipulated in the Kansas Statutes 12-748, the CIP is presented to the Planning Commission for approval as being in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan (Community Investments Plan).
The Sedgwick County CIP approval process will adhere to the following schedule:
. July 15, 2020 - County Manager presents at BoCC . July 22, 2020 – First Public Hearing at BoCC . July 23, 2020- Presentation to Advance Plans . August 6, 2020 – CIP Presentation to the MAPC . August 10, 2020 – Second Public Hearing at BoCC . August 12, 2020 – Budget Adoption
Recommended Action: Staff recommends the MAPC make a finding that the Sedgwick County, Kansas CIP conforms to the Community Investments Plan and the goals contained therein as required by Kansas law.
RECC ~e
Wq `y1CK coG~.~ m .e
~AN6~+5
Division of Finance - 316-660-7591 525 N. Main X823 -Wichita, KS 67203 21 SEDGWICKCOUNTY.OR6 Inside:
Page sea Executive Summary s32 Financial Summary
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 5-YrTotal
Project Type ► Facilities 8 Drainage Projects County Facilities &Drainage 4,386,145 5,318,398 8,040,626 29,429,668 2,839,765 50,014,602 Fire District No. 1 Facilities - - - - - Sub-Total 4,386,145 5,318,398 8,040,626 29,429,668 2,839,765 50,014,602
► Road 8~ Bridge Projects Road Projects 14,335,448 15,375,000 19,700,000 15,450,000 17,800,000 82,660,448 Bridge Projects 6,750,000 7,670,000 4,312,000 4,600.000 4,000,000 27;332,000 Sub-Total 21,085,448 23,045,000 24,012,000 20,050,000 21,800,000 109,992,448
Grand Totals 25,471,593 28,363,398 32,052,626 49,479,fi68 24,639,765 160,Od7,050
2021 CIP by Project Type
Road 8 Bridge 83%
Facilities & Drainage 17%
202 ~ Recommended Budget Page 623 Capita/ /mpro vement Pro9rram
The Law Enforcement Training Center
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Capital Improvement Program Overview spending budget for the upcoming budget year and Sedgwick County's Capital Improvement Program projecting it for years two through five, the planning of (CIP) includes the acquisition, construction, years the program. remodeling, and major maintenance of public facilities and infrastructure systems. To be eligible for the CIP, Sedgwick County Fire District 1 submitted one new a project must be an addition to the County's facilities project for the 2021-2025 CIP. That project, Fire or infrastructure having an expected useful life greater Station 37 Relocation, is currently on the Watch List. than five years and expected cost exceeding $50,000, or maintenance of existing assets that is estimated to The total capital spending budget for 2021 is cost more than $25,000. Excluding preventive road $25,471,593, a decrease of $2.7 million from the 2020 capital budget. maintenance (project R175), CIP projects are The 2021-2025 program continues to characteristically non-routine and beyond the scope of support the County's commitment to maintain and normal operations, including normal expected improve its facilities and infrastructure including maintenance. Routine investments in capital assets, roads, bridges, and drainage. including acquisition and maintenance, are planned for in departmental operating budgets, not the CIP. Planned spending on projects in the 2021-2025 CIP Examples of these expenses include replacement of includes the following five-year totals: $82.7 million for roads, $50.0 fleet vehicles and related equipment (excluding fire million for facilities and drainage, and engines and apparatuses) included in the Fleet $27.3 million for bridges. Management budget, information technology assets included in the Division of Information &Technology budget, and routine maintenance of County-owned 2021-2025 CIP Fundingby Category facilities included in the Facilities Department budget. $150 (in millions) Annual long-range CIP planning began in 1982 with $100 $s2.~ the goal of facilitating area-wide economic $50 $47.5 development by upgrading the County's roads, $27.3 bridges, and drainage systems as well as maintaining $2.5 facilities. Operating under the supervision of the $- County Manager and the approval of the Board of Categories County Commissioners (BOCC), the CIP Committee • Drainage • facifty Bridge ^`' Road provides day-to-day oversight of the program. CIP Committee members guide the programming process which annually produces a plan specifying the capital
2021 Recommended Budget Page 624 Capita/ /mprovement Program
Funding for the five-year CIP plan totals $160.0 CIP Funding by Source million, of which road spending comprises the Facilities &Drainage 2021 2021-2025 majority, as illustrated by the chart on the previous Cash $ 4,386,145 $ 12,577,723 page. Bond - 37,436,879 As a percentage of total costs planned for the 2021- Combined sub-total $ 4,386,145 $ 50,014,602 2025 CIP, road projects account for 51.7 percent, Roads &Bridges facility projects for 29.7 percent, bridge projects for Cash $ 13,796,905 $ 71,393,905 17.1 percent, and drainage projects for 1.6 percent. Bond 4,000,000 20,000,000 Other 3,288,543 18,598,543 Funding Overview Combined sub-total $ 21,085,448 $ 109,992,448 Funding for the CIP occurs on a year-by-year basis. Grand Total $ 25,471,593 S 160,007,050 When funding that is allocated to a project is not bonds, or when unfavorable conditions exist in the completely spent by the end of the fiscal year, it is bond market. carried forward for use in the next fiscal year. Funding for CIP projects comes from annual revenues Bond Funding including property tax, sales tax, liquor tax, contributions from other governments, and proceeds Each County bond issue, whether issued directly by the County or indirectly by the Sedgwick County Public Building Commission (PBC), constitutes a general obligation of the County, meaning the investors are protected from default risk by a pledge of the County's full faith and taxing power. Sedgwick County currently has high debt ratings from each of the three credit rating agencies: "AAA" from Standard & Poor's, "Aaa" from Moody's Investors Service, and "AA+" from Fitch Rating Service, meaning the County is very well positioned to meet its debt obligations, and the result is favorable interest rates. The County's Debt Financing Policy provides for a conservative approach to debt management, designed to sustain the County's high credit ratings and low property tax mill levy. The County may use debt financing for one-time projects included in the five- year CIP and unordinary major equipment purchases. Debt is only used when revenues for debt service are sufficient and reliable to ensure favorable interest rates from issuing bonds. Road, bridge, and drainage and when using fund balance and current revenue projects are often funded by a mix of sources from the would adversely impact the County. Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT), the Federal Highway Administration, and local The actual timing of bond issuance to fund a portion of jurisdictions in Sedgwick County. the CIP depends on the pace of project completion. Typically, the County provides temporary financing of Cash Funding projects with available cash balances, and issues the bonds at the conclusion of the project when long-term When cash funding is used, departmental budgets debt requirements can be precisely determined. In reflect the funding for their projects. For example, the these instances, the bond proceeds are used to Department of Facilities' 2021 budget includes capital replenish the cash balances that provided temporary improvement funding of $141,111 to rebuild the financing for the project. chiller at the Main Courthouse. Allocating funding for cash-funded projects in this manner allows for In April 2017, the BOCC approved a revised debt accurate budgeting and analysis of the impact of policy that provides clear guidance on the County's projects on department operations. use of debt. The objectives of the policy are to ensure financing is obtained only when necessary; the process Cash is used to fund CIP projects when current for identifying the timing and amount of debt or other revenues and fund balances are adequate to fund the financing is as efficient as possible; the most favorable project within an acceptable timeframe, when current interest rate and other related costs are obtained; and debt levels restrict the County from issuing additional future financial flexibility is maintained.
2021 Recommended Budget Page 625 ~a/nita/ /mprovement f~rogrrar~
The following charts outline the guidelines established 3} Direct debt as a percentage of estimated full market value by the Debt Policy which requires the County to will not exceed 1.5 percent remain under at least three of the following five benchmarks. In aggregate, the charts illustrate the County's strong fiscal position. More information on the County's debt management is included in the Bond ,.so^~ — and Interest section of the budget. 1.40°/a 1.20°,G 1) Per capita debt will not exceed $500 1.Q046 a.eo^~ Per Capita Direct Debt 0.60°k o.ao~~ — - -- — --- 600 0.20~~ 500 o.00% 400 'L~^y ti0s6 'L~~~ 'L~~O ~1~~9 ~1D~y~ ,~~`~^ ~y0`~` ,~~~y9 ~D,tiA ,y~tih 300 200 100 0 4) Direct, overlapping, and underlying debt as a percentage of estimated full market value will not exceed 6.0 percent tio'`~' ti0'` 6 ti0'`~ tio'`~ tio'`~ tioti ° tioti~ tioti~ tio`~~ tio'~°~ tioti~' Direct, Overlapping, and Underlying Debt as!6 of Fup Market Value
~Adual ~Pro}edcd Pofcyblaxtiwm 7.00°h --- - - ~ - --
6.00°k 2) Per capita direct, overlapping, and underlying debt will s.00% not exceed $3,000 a.o~^~
Per Capita Diroct,Overlapping, and Underlying Debt s.00~~
2.00°~
34,200 1.00b
53: 0.00°k ,~o~y ,~o~`O ,~o'~~ ryo~0 ,~o~°j ry~ti~ ryoti° ~o9y ryoti3 ~Otia ryo~h 53. ~~~
32. •~~
37,:,~
31,.~~ .~~
-' O~~ O^6 O~~ O~~ O~9 OryO Ory~ o2ry O^~ Oryp Oy 5) Annual debt service will not exceed 10.0 percent of budgeted expenditures of the General Fund and Debt Service ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ~ Fund
~~.w~ on,Maa -van unin,m Annual Debt Service as a °/a of Budgeted E~cpend'Kures 12.00% ------
8.00%
4.00%
0.00%
~ nor oaropnaa Polry Mm~Fnum
Notwithstanding the provisions of the County's Debt Financing Policy, the BOCC has established a principle of using debt in a very targeted and strategic fashion to finance capital projects. This CIP reflects that goal.
202~f ~iecommended Budget Page 626 Capita/ /mprovement Program
Other Funding Capital Budget at $4,386,145 to cover essential facility and drainage projects. A similar process was followed Funding sources other than bond proceeds and local for road and bridge projects, both funded primarily tax revenue are categorized as other funding. Funding from a different cash source, a portion of a one-cent from Federal, State, and local agencies primarily local sales tax. Bond funding is governed by comprise this category. Other funding sources are established County policy. With funding established generally associated with projects resulting from multi- within these constraints, the County Manager then jurisdictional partnerships. reviewed and recommended the CIP to the BOCC for their approval. CIP Process For the 2Q21-2025 CIP, the CIP Committee consisted The CIP is reviewed as the planning for the previous of Lindsay Poe Rousseau, Chief Financial Officer and cycle ends. Project Services assists departments in Committee Chair; Tim Kaufman, Deputy County developing new projects or updating current projects, Manager, Division of Public Services; David Spears, obtaining accurate estimates, determining the potential County Engineer, Division of Public Works; Rusty impact on the operating budget, and submitting project Leeds, Assistant County Manager, Division of Public requests for the next five years. These requests are then Safety; Tania Cole, Assistant County Manager, prioritized by the departments' respective division Division of Administrative Services; Valerie Kaster, directors. The prioritized requests, in turn, are Project Services Manager; and Scott Wadle, Planning submitted to Project Services for consolidation and are Manager, Metropolitan Area Planning Department presented in a draft five-year plan to the CIP (MAPD). Support is provided by the Facilities Committee early in the first quarter of the year. Department, Public Works, and the Budget Office.
The list of department requests was initially CIP Watch List unconstrained. After several meetings that included presentations from departments on specific projects, The Watch List is used to identify and monitor the CIP Committee prioritized each facility and potential projects that are not yet fully defined either in drainage project and developed a rank order listing in scope or in cost. Those projects may not yet meet one which projects are prioritized into tiers based on or more established criteria, such as customer project urgency. The priorities are reflected in the thresholds or traffic counts, or that require funding project listing order on the CIP Facility Project beyond the amount that can be made available. Use of spreadsheet following the executive summary. the Watch List helps ensure these projects remain Emphasis was given to projects initiated in previous visible while keeping planning efforts focused on the years, those requiring system replacements, and those current program. intended to prevent building deterioration. These projects typically receive priority over remodeling or All approved projects receive monthly review and all new construction. open projects are included in the Quarterly Financial Report. Projects that are superseded or unable to be The CIP Committee's selection criteria for the 2021- accomplished are recommended for cancellation and 2025 program included: their corresponding funding returned to the original funding source on approval of the BOCC. • protection of public health and safety; • protection of employee health and safety; Project Execution and Prior Year Projects • compliance with regulatory mandates; • elimination of frequently occurring problems; State Mandates • reduction of ongoing operating costs; • age or condition of existing asset; State law (K.S.A. 68-506 requires counties to • generation of revenue; maintain streets in cities with a population of less than • demonstrable public benefit; 5,000 that form connecting links in the County road • attainment of specified BOCC goal; system and highways included in the secondary road • implementation of comprehensive plan; system or in the system of County minor collector • response to public demand; roads and highways. This State mandate requires • synergy with other CIP projects; and Sedgwick County to maintain such roads in all cities • availability of dedicated funding. within the County except Bel Aire, Valley Center, Derby, Haysville, Park City, and Wichita. According With priorities established, projects were scheduled to State law, these cities are large enough that they are consistent with available funding, resulting in lower expected to maintain their own streets and highways. priority projects moving into later years. The CIP These cities receive an annual maintenance fee per Committee recommended cash funding in the 2021 lane-mile to maintain state highway coruiecting links
2027 Recommended Budget Page 627 Capita/ Improvement Progrram
within their city limits. an amendment process that allows for changes to the project lists and program activities in response to: CIP Environmental Scan • changes in funding allocations from the federal or state governments; MOVE 2040 • grant applications and awards; • response to natural or manmade emergencies; MOVE 2040, an update of the Metropolitan and Transportation Plan (MTP) 2035, is the blueprint for • inability of sponsors to use federal or state the future transportation system serving the Wichita funds available (these funds will not be metropolitan area. It reflects the progress achieved designated for the original sponsor but all with the resources available and a re-examination by eligible sponsors will compete for the funds). the area's elected officials of the outcomes attained since adoption of MTP 2035. MOVE 2040 looks out MOVE 2040 provides an overview of the existing over atwenty-five year planning horizon and identifies roadway network in the WAMPO region and the programs and projects to achieve the region's vision, different services it provides. It also highlights the goals, and desired system conditions. The current plan regional roadway needs, identifies several roadway- is in the process of being reviewed, and an updated related plans that impact the regional network, and draft was presented in 3uly 2020. provides recommendations to improve roads in the WAMPO region. Some recommendations for MOVE 2040 was prepared by the Wichita Area roadways are identified including: Metropolitan Planning organization (WAMPO). WAMPO is the designated Metropolitan Planning • address bottleneck locations on area Organization (MPO) for the Wichita region. WAMPO highways; is not a department of any city or county, but is a • address the condition for some neighborhood regional planning organization charged with planning streets and bridges; and programming federal transportation funds in the • improve the safety at region. Additionally, MOVE 2040 was developed in at-grade railroad crossings; and compliance with the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-2 l ), which authorizes federal • incorporate Intelligent Transportation System funds for a variety of surface transportation programs (ITS) technologies into the roadway network. including highway, safety, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit. MAP-21 provides rules, regulations, and How the CIP Addresses Mandates in MOVE 2040 guidance for transportation planning at the federal, Although the County does not have any specific state, and regional levels, and it centers on a projects that fall under MOVE 2040, the County performance-based approach. continues to work on projects that align with the goals. Examples include: The vision for MOVE 2040 is "to provide a regional multimodal transportation system that is safe, permits • Phase 3 of the equitable opportunity for its use, and advances the Aviation Pathway connecting Derby and region's ongoing vitality through cost conscious Wichita, strategic investments." Goals for MOVE 2040 include: • Multi-use path on Rock Road from McConnell Airforce Base to Oak Knoll, and • choice and connectivity; • Maple Bike Path from Pike Addition to 183rd St. West. • economic vitality; • eliminating bottlenecks; The Division of Public Works constantly monitors freight • movement; traffic on arterial streets and at intersections. The • improving air quality; priority of various CIP projects is adjusted according • infrastructure condition; to this changing traffic information. Equally • qualify of life; important, on a six-year rotating schedule, each mile • safety; and of County road receives an appropriate maintenance • system reliability. treatment based on its condition. The CIP also continues an aggressive replacement program for For the first time, WAMPO selected projects and bridges with posted weight limits. The County identified programs to follow a targeted transportation continues to support efforts to obtain State project investment strategy for MOVE 2040. Additional funding to address other issues identified in the 2040 projects were selected and funded by member plan, such as the freeway system and crossings over jurisdictions to allow them to address their local the floodway. For example, beginning in 2021, priorities and needs. MOVE 2040 does incorporate Sedgwick County committed to providing the local
2021 Recommended Budget Page 628 Capita/ /mprovement` Progrram
match, along with the City of Wichita, to KDOT funding for improvements at the north junction of Interstate 135, Interstate 235, Kansas Highway 254, and Kansas Highway 96. The interchange handles over 100,000 vehicles a day and is a major source of traffic delays and accidents.
With this support and careful planning, the County expects to continue to achieve significant progress in the maintenance and upgrade of its bridge infrastructure. As the Year Number Planned biannual bridge inspection Process identifies 2021 6 functionally obsolete or ~ 2022 6 structurally deficient 2023 5 structures, Public Works staff prioritizes them and 2024 5 programs them in the CIP 2025 1 for replacement as funding Total 23 allows. Currently, 45 (7.5 percent) of Sedgwick County's bridges are structurally deficient. This is similar to the current rate for the entire nation (7.3 percent) but higher than the State of Kansas (5.1 percent). The 23 bridges planned for this CIP should help address the issue.
Financial Summaries and Project Pages Space intentionally left blank Financial summaries and project pages follow that provide detailed information for each project recommended to the BOCC.
2021 Recommended Budged Page 629 Capita/ /mpro vement Program
Significant Current and Upcoming CIP Juve~iCe Residential Facility HVAC System Replacement Projects Project Overview This project Will Elections Building Funding Project Expenditures replace the heating, Type Allocation Project Overview ro-aate ventilation, and air On 3anuary 6, 2017, Cash $0.4 million $0.0 million conditioning Funding Project Expenditures the Department Of (HVAC) system at Type Allocation tadate Homeland Security the Juvenile Residential Facility. The current system Cash $3.0 $0.0 million Secretary Jeh is 22 years old and has exceeded its useful life. The Johnson declared new equipment will utilize a high efficiency variable elections to be a part of the nation's critical refrigerant flow system. The installation will be infrastructure. This project is to either construct or detailed to facilitate the ease of maintenance and remodel a building to accommodate 26,000 square feet access to save County staff time and money in the or more of space for the combined use of the Elections future. Office and warehouse space for elections equipment. The building will have adequate security and access measures for critical infrastructure as well as adequate ~ Flood Control System Maior Maintenance and Renair parking for staff, election workers, voters, the media, Project Overview The flOOd control and supervising judges. system represents a Funding Project Expenditures Type Allocation tadate significant long- term investment in Northwest Bypass Right-of-Way Acquisition Cash $3.0 million $0.0 million infrastructure. The Project Overview This project, which system is inspected Funding Project Expenditures Will greatly enhance annually by the Corps of Engineers and is required to Type Allocation tadate the safety and undergo an extensive certification process for the efficiency Of the Federal Emergency Cash $S.0 million ~D.D I727IIlOYJ Management Agency (FEMA) interchange, has been every ten years. These inspections have shown that identified as the top regional priority for local the system is in good working order but indicate that governments and private industry. The purpose of ongoing annual investments in major maintenance and this project is to purchase high-priority right-of-way repair are needed to keep the system in good working tracts as the costs can increase over time and as order. Ongoing work will include repair or development occurs on needed tracts. (Project replacement of toe drains, flood gates, concrete, Overview includes funding from 2020 through 2025.) erosion control systems, earthwork on levees and channels, and other critical elements of the system. The long-term maintenance plan indicates that the County and City of Wichita need to invest a total of $1.0 million per year through 2026, and costs are projected to double beginning in 2027. The 2020 allocation for this project is $0.5 million. (Project Overview includes funding from 2020 through 2025.)
2021 Recommended Budget Page 630 Capita/ /mproveme~rt Proc,~rr-~m
North Junction Gold Phase Project Overview KDOT iS planning improvements to the Funding Project Expeoditares N01't~l Type Allocation to-date Junction interchange which Other ,$].6 million $0.0 million handles over 1 ~~,~~~ vehicles per day. At present, the interchange is a major source of traffic delays, and accidents in the region and improvements are needed to increase safety and mobility.
1
t q , ,.
. ,.~ Space intentionally left blank M ' ty 1' a 1
Z~,~' f~ecommended Buc9ge~ Page ss~ Sedgwick County, Kansas Capital Improvements Program
Access the link below and scroll down to the full Capital Improvements Program for detailed information on specific projects. https://www.sedgwickcounty.org/finance/budget/2021-recommended-budget/
AGENDA ITEM: X
WICHITA-SEDGWICK COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: July 23, 2020
TO: Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
FROM: Mary M. Hunt, Principal Planner – Advanced Plans
SUBJECT: DER2020-00005: City of Wichita Capital Improvement Program 2021-2030 Recommendation
Background: The City of Wichita, Kansas Finance Department prepares an annual Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for the upcoming ten year period. On Thursday, July 23, 2020 the Advanced Plans Committee recommended the City of Wichita CIP be included on the August 6, 2020 Metropolitan Area Planning Commission agenda. Mr. Mark Manning, Budget Officer with the Finance Department will present the CIP for 2021 – 2030 to the Commission. As stipulated in the Kansas Statutes 12-748, the CIP is presented to the Planning Commission for approval as being in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan (Community Investments Plan).
The City of Wichita CIP approval process will adhere to the following schedule:
. July 21, 2020 – City Manager CIP Presentation to the City Council & First Public Hearing . July 23, 2020 – CIP Presentation to Advance Plans Committee . August 4, 2020 – Second Public Hearing . August 6, 2020 CIP Presentation to the MAPC . August 11, 2020 – Final Public Hearing and Budget Adoption, including CIP by City Council
Recommended Action: Staff recommends the MAPC make a finding that the County CIP conforms to the Community Investments Plan and the goals contained therein as required by Kansas law.
Celebrating the people ~~TY of making a difference w WI C HI TA ti FINANCIAL SUMMARIES
CITY OF WICHITA
2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS 2021- 2030 QROPO~~D
Vision Statement The City of Wichita is a leading-edge organization serving a dynamic and inclusive community.
Mission Statement As an exceptionally well-run city, we will . Keep Wichita safe, . Grow our economy, . Build dependable infrastructure and . Provide conditions for living well.
Wichita
All•America City NNka~,,l~ ~],~~L ~,-H~l~.~~►
2019
2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program 1 Wichita, Kansas Table of Contents w
INTRODUCTION PAGE DETAILED PROJECT LISTING PAGE Title Page with Mission Statement ...... 1 Airport ...... 57 Table of Contents ...... 2 Bridges...... 61 CIP Highlights ...... 3 Freeways ...... 65 Government Finance Officers Association Award ...... 4 Heavy Equipment ...... 69 ICMA-Analytics Certificate of Distinction ...... 5 Park and Recreation ...... 73 City Overoiew ...... 6 Public Facilities ...... 77 Organization Chart ...... 7 Public Safety ...... 81 Wichita City Council District Map ...... 8 Sewer...... 85 Wichita Elected Officials ...... 9 Stormwater...... 89 Directory ...... 10 Special Assessments ...... 93 Guide to the Capital Improvement Program ...... 11 Streets...... 97 Transit...... 103 CITY MANAGER'S POLICY MESSAGE Water ...... 107 City Manager's Policy Message ...... 15 Policy Issues...... 20 ONGOING PROJECT SUMMARIES PAGE CIP Implementation ...... 29 Revenues and Expenditure Summaries ...... 111 CIP Budget Process ...... 30 Airport ...... 114 Bridges...... 11fi FINANCIAL SUMMARIES Freeways ...... 118 Revenue and Expenditure Summaries ...... 33 Park and Recreation ...... 120 Financial Plan -Debt Service Fund ...... 38 Public Facilities ...... 122 Financial Plan -Local Sales Tax Fund ...... 44 Public Safety ...... 126 Financial Plan -Tourism and Convention Fund ...... 46 Sewer...... 128 Financial Plan -Airport Fund ...... 48 Stormwater...... 130 Financial Plan - Stormwater Utility Fund ...... 50 Streets...... 132 Financial Plan -Sewer Utility Fund...... 52 Transit...... 136 Financial Plan -Water Utility Fund ...... 54 Water ...... 138
APPENDIX Debt Service Schedules ...... 142 City Council Policy 2 -Financing of Public Improvements ...... 166 City Administrative Regulation 2,8 - CIP...... 168 City Ordinance 41-815 -Sales Tax Revenues ...... 170 K.S.A. 10-308 -10-310 etseq. -Debt Limit Law ...... 171 Design Council Projects ...... 172 Glossary...... 173
2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program 2 Wichita, Kansas Capital Improvement Program Hi~hli~hts
2021-2030 CIP Highlights
The 2021-2030 Proposed C1P takes the overall spending priorities and guidelines from the Community Investments Plan and funds projects aligned with the City's mission. As an exceptionally well-run city, we will: keep Wichita safe; grow Wichita's economy; build dependable infrastructure; and provide conditions for living well,
• The deferral of several projects is recommended due to the expected impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on key revenues. Sales taxes, transient guest taxes and property taxes are expected to be impacted to varying degrees. Due to these factors, the Proposed CIP includes the deferral of 18 projects, totaling $28.2 million. Most of these projects were originally scheduled for 2020-2022, and will be deferred up to three years. Examples of projects that are delayed include Splash Pad Maintenance, Library improvements and Snow Removal Equipment.
• To support public safety, $101.1 million is included. That includes $36,7 million to replace fire trucks and related equipment, $13.1 million for Police and Fire radio replacements and $18.8 million for other Public Safety equipment and facility upgrades. There is also $34 million in funding for the replacement of three Police stations and three Fire stations.
. A total of $30.5 million is included for projects in the downtown area. These projects include improvements to Douglas Avenue from Main to Washington, 2nd Street from Main to St. Francis, Downtown Streetscape Implementation, and Commerce Area improvements. Public investment in downtown continues to provide infrastructure that supports hundreds of millions in private investment.
. Street pavement maintenance efforts are expanded, with a total of $154 million included in the 2021-2030 Proposed CIP. Total annual funding will rise from $11 million in 2021 to $20 million by 2030.
• Bicycle and Pedestrian improvement projects are funded with more than $12 million. These projects are consistent with recommendations by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Board and are coordinated with other CIP projects.
• Nearly $11 million is included to fund public art associated with capital projects. Approximately one-half of this funding has been embedded in project budgets identified in coordination with the Design Council, while the other half is currently unallocated. This funding is supplemental to the aesthetic improvements already funded in project budgets, based on the design standards used on City projects.
• Debt levels will increase, but not beyond benchmark levels, and will decrease towards the end of the ten- year planning horizon. Tota! debt is expected to rise, consistent with spending plans developed over the past few years. However, this debt is projected to be managed within benchmark levels before declining in the out years.
2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program 3 Wichita, Kansas CITY OF WtC H ITA
July 21, 2020
Honorable Mayor Brandon Whipple Members of the Wichita City Council;
Dear Mayer Whipple and Members of the City Council:
Submitted for consideration and adoption by the City Council is the 2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP), This Proposed CIP is guided by the City Council's approved mission and goals, the broad priorities of the long-term Community Investments Plan, and resident feedback that has emphasized street maintenance and public safety. The CIP also funds a number of quality of life projects that enhance the livability of our city, Finally, this CIP is based on City Council policy direction and is designed to be financially viable and sustainable.
Developing the Capital Improvement Program The CIP funds improvements that are aligned to four strategic priorities: E The 2021-2030 Proposed CIP is based on the City Coun- keeping Wichita safe, growing our economy, building dependable ~ cil's mission and goals, is aligned with the Community infrastructure and providing conditions for living well, These projects are I Investments Plan, and is financed within capacity guide- fiscally responsible and aligned with being a well-run city. The ! lines. Community Investments Pian, which is a broad, long-term plan, also guides CIP development, primarily by providing guidance on overall spending priorities.
A variety of other planning processes influence the development of the CIP. The Park and Recreation Open Space Plan provides overall guidance for Park improvements. The Downtown Master Plan provides an overall strategy for downtown improvements. The ongoing West Bank improvements are based on detailed project plans developed far that area, The proposed Library branch improvements are based on a study of each branch and the neighborhoods they serve. The Water and Sewer Utilities Optimization Project will continue to have a significant impact in shaping Engagement is important. Feedback is generated through future Water and Sewer Utility project plans, social media citizen surve ys, the Bud~ et Simulator as well as neighborhood and stakeholder meetings. A variety of stakeholders are actively engaged in the CIP process. Resident feedback on strategic priorities—which is gathered through social media, neighborhood meetings, citizen surveys and most Wichita is online ,~ recently, the Budget Simulator—plays a crucial role. The Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee reviews the CIP and provides Nextdoor recommendations an funding amounts and specific projects related to • Like us at Ciry of bike pathways. The CIP is presented to the Metropolitan Area Planning Wichita-Government Commission (MAPC) and the Advance Plans Committee of the MAPC; • Follow us @CityofWichita as well as other stakeholders. Discussion with the City Council is • Find us on Nextdoor at City of Wichita broadcast on City7, and CIP materials are posted on the City's website at www.wichita.gov.
2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program 15 Cit Mana er's Polic Messa e w
The CIP is developed to be financially responsible, Financial capacity is projected based on City Council policy guidance, statutory provisions and bond covenants. Detailed financial plans are developed. For the Water and Sewer Utilities, Public Works & Utilities staff utilized the Cost of Service Analysis (COSA) to determine capacity and rate impacts. Debt Service Fund capacity is guided by policy direction on the mill levy rate and limiting debt service payments to less than 67°/o of available revenues each year.
On a more tactical level, prioritization of projects focuses on leveraging opportunities, contractual obligations, partnership agreements, alignment with related improvements and impacts on the operating budget. This comprehensive, top-down approach, which includes both global and granular reviews, is re~iected in a prioritization model. This model, together with the financial capacity analysis, guides which projects are included and when they are funded.
Finally, the 2021-2030 Proposed CIP was developed in the midst of the ~ The 2021-2030 Proposed CIP was developed in the midst COVID-19 pandemic. Fortunately, the foundational aspects of the City i of the COVID-19 crisis. Several key revenue streams are Council's mission and goals and City policies designed to ensure fiscal I expected to be impacted, which has led to the recommen- sustainability have guided the development of the CIP. However, several I' dation to defer a variety of projects scheduled for 2020- key revenue components are expected to be impacted by the COVID-19', 2023. crisis and the associated economic fallout. Property tax revenues are driven largely by assessed valuation growth, which is expected to slow considerably by 2022 (assessed valuation growth typically lags behind economic conditions). Local sales tax funds, which are used to mostly fund street projects, are expected to drop in 2020, before returning to very slow growth in 2022. Finally, the Transient Guest Tax Fund is expected to experience up to two years of depressed revenues. Due to these factors, the Proposed CIP includes the recommendation to defer 18 projects totaling $28.2 million. Most of these projects were originally scheduled far 2020-2022,
CIP Summary The Proposed CIP is a 10-year, $1.99 billion plan, Over $384.8 million is allocated for street projects, including $154 million for road maintenance. Water and Sewer projects total nearly $795 million, including $355.2 million for a new biological nutrient
Totals may not sum due to rounding.
2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program 16 Cit Mana er's Polic Messa e w
removal plant. A total of $121 million in freeway improvements is included for the North Junction project. Public Facility projects are budgeted at $52.1 million. This includes improvements to four branch libraries and funding for improvements to cultural facilities. Park improvements total $24.1 million, with $3.0 million allocated to complete the Aquatics Master Pfan. Other totals include Transit ($18.8 million), Bridges ($18.3 million), Stormwater improvements ($57.6 million), Heavy Equipment ($37.2 million), Public Safety ($101.1 million) and Airpark ($74.2 million).
The Proposed CIP includes $279.1 million in GO at-large funded projects, which are financed through the Debt Service Fund based on the property #ax mill levy rate of 7.0 mills (2021 and 2022) and 7.5 mills (2023-2030). Local sales tax funding totaling $303.1 million is', the Proposed CIP is based on a Debt Service Fund mill budgeted to fund mostly street improvements. These funds are derived ~~~Y rate of 7.0 mills in 2021 and 2022, increasing to 7.5 from the City's share of the County-wide local sales tax. Utility funds are' mills beginning in 2023. used to fund $795 million in Sewer and Water Utility improvements. These revenues are derived from fees paid by utility customers. Federal and State funding is expected to total $177.2 million, special assessments are budgeted at $305 million and all other funding sources total $129.6 million,
In addition to the new projects included in the Proposed CIP, it is important to account for another $1.112 billion in CIP projects that have been initiated by prior City Council action and remain in progress. Of this $1,112 billion, $655 million has been financed. However, a projected $454 million remains to be financed in the future. Additionally, the financial plan included in the Proposed CIP incorporates funding capacity to ensure the permanent financing of all previously approved projects,
Financing the Proposed CIP
The Proposed CIP continues to utilize debt as a tool to expand projects beyond what would be available if only cash funding were used, A variety of measures are used to monitor debt levels. For Water and Sewer Utility improvements funded with Utility funds, a debt coverage ratio minimum of 1.2 is stipulated by bond covenants. For Local Sales Tax funded improvements, which are typically financed with double-barreled bonds backed by sales tax revenues and the full faith and credit of the City, a coverage ratio of at least 1,1 is required by bond covenants.
In order to measure GO at-large debt levels, staff have developed several metrics. Benchmarks were identified in a study by Standard & Poor's of the 41 municipalities with a AAA bond rating, meaning they represent the average debt levels for cities with the highest band ratings with populations of more than 250,000, The metrics do not indicate the appropriate level of debt; however, they do provide a view of whether debt is increasing or decreasing, and how that debt level compares relative to the nation's most financially sound cities. GO At-large Debt ServiceI Property Tax ~ ~°% Revenues 9o~io 80% 70% 60% 50%
40% Benchmark 30% 20% —2021-2030 Proposed C IP 10% 0% 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program 17 Cit Mana er's Polic Messa e w
The Proposed CIP includes GO at-large debt levels that are within the City benchmarks. The estimated debt service as a ratio of revenues will peak at 65.3% in 2029, below the benchmark of 66.6%. Debt trends are forecasted to be similar to the general trend identified several years ago. GO at-large debt levels will increase based on the planned level of projects and past projects for which permanent financing has yet to be arranged. However, as prior debt service for bonds issued mature, debt levels are expected to moderate to approximately 50% of annual revenues. Although the benchmark for the City's debt level is 66.6%, ideally the City typically strives fora 50150 mix between pay-as-you-go (cash) financing and debt financing for GO at-large projects. GO at-large debt levels will rise in the early years of the Other funds utilize debt to fund CIP projects. Local Sales Tax debt levels Proposed ClP, before falling by 2030. The ratio of GO (measured as a percentage of sales tax revenues) are expected to debt service to property tax revenues will rise, but not remain within 50°/o-70°/o, which has been the typical range over the past exceeding the benchmark level. 18 years. Water and Sewer debt levels are both measured using a coverage ratio, which is the ratio of net revenues available for debt service divided by revenue bond debt service, which must remain above 1.2. Based on financial modeling prepared by Public Works &Utilities staff, both utilities are expected to remain above the coverage ratio based on the projects included in this Proposed CIP.
Creating a Livable Community The discussion of the CIP in terms of numbers, calculations, and forecasts is very important. It is a comprehensive long-term financial and operational plan, However, the CIP is also a vision for our community~utlining a series of planned improvements that will make our community a safer place and a more livable place, Viewing the CIP process through that lens, community needs and wants are ever-changing and will continue to evolve. The CIP reflects this desire for progress—the following changes highlight this idea:
Modern Police Stations - The Proposed CIP includes funding to build four new Police stations, replacing smaller facilities built in the early 1990's, These stations will provide modern spaces for residents to interact with Police Officers and will provide Police staff the infrastructure necessary to pro-actively provide public safety services.
Modern Fire Stations -Three Fire stations will be modernized based on funding included in this Proposed CIP. These new stations will accommodate the most modern fire equipment and will ensure that crews are located in the optimal location to best serve Wichita residents.
Fast Commutes - The Proposed CIP has the financial capacity to finance the ongoing improvements to East Kellogg. When completed in 2020. the commute time for residents to reach downtown will be reduced. In addition, funding in coordination with the State and Sedgwick County is included to modernize the North Junction, an important intersection of two interstate highways and one state highway.
Better Library Branches -Concurrent with the opening of the new Advanced Learning Library, a study of the six branches was conducted, to ensure that the infrastructure to address the specific service needs of each neighborhood were addressed. The Proposed CIP includes funding to meet these infrastructure needs.
• Increasing Bikeabiltv and Walkability -The Proposed CIP continues to invest in infrastructure focused on making Wichita more pedestrian and bicycle friendly. These improvements are based on community feedback and recommendations.
Smoother Streets - The importance of well-maintained streets is essential for a livable community. The Proposed CIP includes significant increases in funding to maintain local streets.
More Recreational Opportunities - The aquatics assets in Wichita will be significantly improved for a new generation of Wichita residents. The majority of this funding has been previously approved, but this CIP does include $3 million to complete the vision included in that plan.
~~ 2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program 1s Cit Mana er's Polic Messa e w
Conclusion This Proposed CIP includes substantial investments in the Wichita community. The 2021-2030 Proposed CIP is designed to be a financially viable plan for specific infrastructure projects, created using a prioritization model. It is also guided by financial capacity guidelines, the broad guidelines of the Community Investments Plan and policy guidance provided by the City Council. However, the actual implementation of this plan occurs when the City Council takes action to initiate each individual project. Hence. when adopting the CIP, the Council is providing overall policy guidance on a long-term project plan, Perhaps most importantly, this Capital Improvement Program is guided by the strategic mission provided by the City Council: that Wichita will be a well-run city, and a safe, livable place with dependable infrastructure and a growing economy.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert Layton City Manager
Acknov~~ledgem~n's would like to recognize the team of professional City staff that developed the CIP. Finance staff, including Direcfor Shawn Henning, Budget and Research Officer Elizabeth Goltry, City Treasurer Mark L. Manning and Budget staff Sean Sandefur, Lindsey Vogt and Jordan Torres worked tirelessly to facilitate the financial models and to coordinate the CIP document production. In addition, the CIP Committee, chaired by Assistant City Manager Donte Martin and consisting of various department directors, was instrumental in putting this plan together. Finally, a variety of departmental staff were involved in developing project requests, reviewing materials and identifying priority projects.
- ~ ~ - -- 2021-2030 Proposed Capital Improvement Program 19 City of Wichita, Kansas
Capital Improvements Program
Access the link below to view the full Capital Improvements Program for detailed information on specific projects. https://www.wichita.~ov/Finance/Pages/CIP.aspx 2020
2020 Development Trends Summary Sketch
Subdivision Activity: Wichita’s residential subdivision activity in 2019 was the highest in 13 years and the regional total was up 57% over 2018 levels and twice the 5-year average of potential residential units. Regional Commercial and office subdivision activity was down 71% over the 5-year average, but industrial subdivision activity was up slightly from the 5-year average.
Vacant Buildable Lot Activity: The total supply of vacant buildable lots increased from 2018 levels as the supply rate (lots available divided by permits issued for the year) jumped to over three and a half years.
Building Permit Activity: Residential Building in Wichita fell 33% in net dwelling units added from 2018 levels while net units in the small cities in Sedgwick County increased 20% from 2018 levels. The regional total for net units added was 19% below the 5-year average. Maize saw over 12% of net dwelling units built in the region in 2019 while Bel Aire saw nearly 8% of net dwelling units added.
Commercial building activity for Wichita permits was 8% below 2018 activity, but square footage built was 40% above 2018 activity. In the small cities the permits were at 89% of 2018 activity, but square footage was up 25% below 2018 activity. The region as a whole was at about even with 2018 commercial building activity for permits, but had 16% more square footage built.
Population: Current MAPD population estimates put Wichita at 392,240 and Sedgwick County at 516,025. However, Wichita’s growth rate for the decade is one third of what was projected in the Community Investments Plan (the Wichita and Sedgwick County Comprehensive Plan). Sedgwick County’s population growth rate is just over 40% of its projected rate.
Maize, with an estimated population of 5,055, is at 160% of its projected rate. Bel Aire is at 87% of its projected growth rate with a population of 8,325.
1
2020 Development Trends Summary — Subdivision Activity
Residential Subdivisions
96%
5.9%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
1.4%
2.1%
0.0%
9.2%
0.3%
0.2%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.7%
0.1%
0.0%
7.0%
0.2%
1.2%
0.5%
5.2%
2.0%
9.8%
3.5%
36.6%
13.3%
12.1%
58.6%
13.9%
23.7%
100.0%
of Total of
Dwelling Units Dwelling
2014-2018 Percent 2014-2018
0
6
0
0
4
2
0
0
2
9
1
0
2
7
76
18
27
20
90
16
68
26
46
473
119
171
156
758
179
306
126
1292
1247
Potential
Residential Units Residential
2014-2018 Average 2014-2018
0
2
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
2
8
1
0
2
7
4
64
12
27
12
60
59
16
28
37
13
780
735
188
532
151
215
105
Residential
Lots Platted Lots
2014-2018 Average 2014-2018
96%
4.4%
0.0%
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
4.9%
0.0%
2.0%
6.1%
5.7%
0.0%
5.2%
6.5%
0.0%
of Total of
36.4%
10.2%
18.4%
57.2%
19.9%
19.9%
100.0%
2019 Percent 2019
Dwelling Units Dwelling
0
4
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
3
0
0
0
0
55
48
105
875
244
443
118
146
137
478
479
124
157
2403
2298
1375
2019
Potential**
Residential Units Residential
Residential Subdivision Activity* Subdivision Residential
0
4
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
3
0
0
0
0
55
59
48
55
64
59
105
764
244
391
137
414
474
2065
1960
1148
2019
by Comprehensive Plan 2035 Urban Growth Area Growth Urban 2035 Comprehensive Plan by
Residential
Lots Platted Lots
Wichita Established CentralArea Established Wichita
Andover
Viola
Valley Center Valley
Sedgwick
Park City Park
Mulvane
Mount Hope Mount
Maize
Kechi
Haysville
Goddard
GardenPlain
Eastborough
Derby
Colwich
Clearwater
Cheney
Bentley
BelAire
Andale
Wichita Southwest Wichita
Wichita South Wichita
Wichita Southeast Wichita
Wichita Northwest Wichita
Wichita North Wichita
Wichita Northeast Wichita
Wichita Central Wichita
Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Area Subtotal Area Growth Urban 2035 Wichita
(Sub-areas)
Small Cities & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Subtotal Areas Growth Urban 2035 &Cities Small
** ** Potential itunitsResidential plat zoning; computed upon based iswhether are single-family, multi-family.duplex or data. Multi-family units may to due not unavailable known be
* The numbers in this summary reflect relative levels of interest among geographic areas. Replatting and other actions areas. other and Replatting interest maygeographic of among in cause numbers this levels duplication in * lotThe summary counts. relative reflect
Region TotalRegion
Sedgwick Co. Total Co. Sedgwick
Small City & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Growth Urban 2035 & City Small
(Includes County Northeast, (Includes Southeast, Southwest and Northwest sub-areas)
Rural Areas Areas Rural
City of Wichita & 2035 Urban Growth Area Growth Urban 2035 & Wichita of City Growth Areas Growth
2
2020 Development Trends Summary — Subdivision Activity
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.0%
9.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
1.0%
6.2%
0.8%
2.1%
1.6%
3.6%
0.0%
22.2%
17.5%
31.7%
of Total of
100.0%
Dwelling Units Dwelling
2014-2018 Percent 2014-2018
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
77
13
80
11
27
21
46
118
287
225
408
1289
Potential
Residential Units Residential
2014-2018 Average 2014-2018
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
66
93
13
58
10
27
10
25
92
777
175
222
Residential
Lots Platted Lots
2014-2018 Average 2014-2018
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.2%
4.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
2.0%
0.1%
0.1%
5.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2019
14.6%
39.6%
12.6%
14.3%
of Total of
Dwelling Units Dwelling
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
49
149
118
352
951
130
302
344
2019
2,403 100.0%
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
59
49
70
142
352
894
238
253
ResidentialSubdivision by School Activity District*
2019
2,065
Lots PlattedLots Units Residential
Circle
Maize
Derby
Haven
Burton
Wichita
Cheney
Mulvane
Andover
Renwick
Halstead
RoseHill
Goddard
Kingman
Haysville
Sedgwick
Clearwater
TOTAL
USD440
USD439
USD394
USD385
USD375
USD369
USD356 ConwaySprings
USD331
USD312
USD268
USD267
USD266
USD265
USD264
USD263
USD262 Center Valley
USD261
USD260
USD259
USD206 Remington-Whitewater
SchoolDistrict Name District Residential Potential**
** Potential Residential units are calculated based upon zoning of the plat whether it ** Potentialthe plat isunitsof whether zoning Residential calculated upon are multi-family.single-family, based or data. duplex Multi-family units mayto due unavailable not known be * The numbers in this summary only reflect relative levels of interest among geographic areas. Replatting and other actions other lotareas. and maycounts.Replatting interestcausegeographic of among in duplication individual in thisnumbers levels * summaryThe only relative reflect
3 I135 125TH 125TH 1ST
295TH I135
SEDGWICK 127TH 135TH
24TH 117TH 279TH
I135 247TH 231ST 117TH
117TH 143RD
School Districts in 263RD
47TH 151ST
199TH 167TH
215TH 439 RIDGE
10TH 109TH 183RD
109TH 109TH BENTLEY HYDRAULIC 55TH Sedgwick County, 311TH 369 39TH I135
101ST HILLSIDE 101ST
101ST 101ST
159TH 63RD Kansas MOUNT HOPE 440 262 I135 206 97TH
87TH 93RD 93RD 93RD
93RD 71ST 312 93RD SENECA
I135
127TH 119TH
103RD 85TH 231ST 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 263RD 85TH
85TH 79TH I135
I135
295TH
279TH 95TH 215TH 81ST Legend 151ST 215TH VALLEY CENTER 77THI135 77TH
167TH
247TH 77TH 183RD 199TH K96 77TH K96 School District Boundaries SENECA
INTERURBAN 79TH 111TH
69TH 63RD
69TH 69TH 375
95TH
MERIDIAN
55TH HILLSIDE
199TH I135 KECHI RIDGE
247TH K254 61ST 61ST 61ST 61ST 61ST RUSH 61ST PARK CITY K254 61ST 55TH 267 K96 ANDALE COLWICH LARSON I135
53RD 143RD
K96 53RD 53RD K254 DEER
OLIVER 127TH 53RD CHICAGO I135 RUN
KEYWEST SENECA 1ST 46TH K254 BEL AIRE 45TH 45TH K254
231ST I235 MAIZE K96 I135 BRISTOL K96 I235 I235 39TH K96 WOMER 37TH 37TH K96 I135 259 37TH I135 I235 37TH I235 º I235 K96 K96 K96 K96
I135 159TH 33RD K96 WEBB
HOOVER K96
279TH I235 OHIO 29TH 29TH
266 29TH K96K96 295TH
215TH 29TH I235 K96 385 29TH TIME TEE 25TH 25TH K96 25TH 26TH MAINSGATE K96 CURTIS I135 WEST
AMIDON 22ND I235 21ST 21ST ZOO 21ST I135I135 20TH ARKANSAS 391ST 21ST REFLECTION19TH I235 18TH K96
I135 17TH FARMVIEW 17TH GROVE 15TH MOSLEY I135 I235 PARK K96 13TH 13TH K96
375TH 13TH OLIVER SEDGWICK COUNTY PARKDALE ARMOUR
13TH PORTER RIVER ANDOVER 13TH WINDMILL
WEST 9THI135 9TH
183RD HARVEST 9TH K96 MARKET
WACO I35 HICKORY I235 359TH WICHITA CENTRAL MCLEAN CENTRAL I35 I135 I35
311TH I35 PAUL
GATEWOOD WOODLAWN
4TH TEE SAINT 2ND 1ST
407TH HOOVER K96
2ND MAIN I35 CADDY 151ST DOUGLAS
ANNA EASTBOROUGH US54 WILLO KELLOGG KELLOGG I35 ESQUEMAPLE
KELLOGG EMPORIA K96 MAPLE TAFT I35 6TH KELLOGG I35 127TH
6TH 327TH I235 LINCOLN 383RD LINCOLN LINCOLN LONGFORD US54 PARKRIDGE KELLOGG I35 US54 PUEBLO BLUFF
US54 263RD US54 US54 US54 HARRY HARRY HARRY 143RD
US54 HARRY I235 247TH KELLOGG I135I135 MOUNT TODD
I235 CLIFTON 15TH US54 GODDARD SOUTHEAST 15TH MAY VERNON GARDEN PLAIN CHERRY CREEK
PAWNEE I135 PAWNEE PAWNEE TYLER 265 LARK PAWNEE SOUTHWEST 391ST YOSEMITE
375TH 23RD I235 WASHINGTON PARKRIDGE K42
GODDARD I35 ROCK
RIDGE
I135
HILLSIDE WEST CLEAR
GLENN 31ST K15 31ST 31ST CESSNA 31ST 31ST 407TH 359TH I235
31ST 167TH RICHMOND MAIZE K42 I235 I235 I135 I35 I35
GOLD
CHENEY HOOVER I135 39TH
I135 I35 127TH MACARTHUR I235
39TH TYLER 44TH 43RD I35 SOUTHEAST 45TH I135 I35 47TH 47TH 47TH 261 I135
47TH 143RD 159TH
343RD 47TH I35 260 295TH
I35 279TH
I35 119TH
55TH GREENWICH 55TH
55TH WOODLAWN
87TH
199TH MAIZE
55TH SENECA
RIDGE 247TH WEST 63RD 63RD CLIFTON 63RD 63RD PATRIOT TALL 63RD K15 63RD 268 HYDRAULIC TREE
394139TH
K15 MAIN 99TH 71ST 71ST GROVE
327TH 71ST I35 MEADOWLARK
135TH 55TH
71ST HAYSVILLE GREENWICH
K42 BUCKNER I35 DERBY 79TH MADISON 79TH 79TH
311TH 79TH 79TH MARKET
79TH 79TH 83RD 375TH
159TH 391ST I35 151ST 87TH 87TH 87TH
87TH 87TH GREENWICH
264 I35
199TH
WOODLAWN
BLUFF 71ST
39TH 95TH 95TH WEBB
103RD K15 231ST 247TH
407TH 95TH
95TH ROCK HILLSIDE
SENECA K15
356 MERIDIAN 103RD 103RD
103RD 103RD 239TH 103RD 103RD 175TH CLEARWATER 159TH . 135TH
103RD I35 BROADWAY 279TH 103RD 295TH 107TH 111TH 111TH ROCK 111TH 111TH 111TH 231ST 111TH EMERALDVALLEY 359TH 111TH I35
331 199TH 263
247TH 87TH MULVANE
7TH 119TH OLIVER
111TH 119TH 183RD VIOLA 215TH
331MAIN 119TH 119TH 55TH
135TH 2020 Development Trends Summary — Subdivision Activity
Commercial Subdivisions
5
2020 Development Trends Summary — Subdivision Activity
0
4
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
1
0
8
1
5
2
24
24
20
Lots
Industrial
2014-2018 Average 2014-2018
4
0
1
0
3
1
0
1
7
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
5
6
7
96
92
31
12
13
60
12
19
10
OfficeLots
Commercial & Commercial
2014-2018 Average 2014-2018
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
1
3
0
4
26
26
16
10
Lots
2019
Industrial
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
9
4
0
0
1
28
28
12
16
2019
OfficeLots
Commercial & Commercial
by Comprehensive Plan 2035 Urban Growth Area Growth Urban 2035 Plan Comprehensive by
Commercial/Office and Industrial Subdivision Activity Subdivision Industrial and Commercial/Office
Wichita Established CentralAea Established Wichita
Andover
Viola
Valley Center Valley
Sedgwick
Park City Park
Mulvane
Mount Hope Mount
Maize
Kechi
Haysville
Goddard
GardenPlain
Eastborough
Derby
Colwich
Clearwater
Cheney
Bentley
BelAire
Andale
Wichita Southwest Wichita
Wichita South Wichita
Wichita Southeast Wichita
Wichita Northwest Wichita
Wichita North Wichita
Wichita Northeast Wichita
Wichita Central Wichita
Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Area Subtotal Area Growth Urban 2035 Wichita
(Sub-areas)
Small Cities & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Subtotal Areas Growth Urban 2035 & Cities Small
* The numbers in this summary reflect relative levels of interest among geographic areas. Replatting and other actions areas. other and Replatting interest maygeographic of among in cause numbers this levels duplication in * lotThe summary counts. relative reflect
Region TotalRegion
Sedgwick Co. Total Co. Sedgwick
Small City & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Growth Urban 2035 & City Small
(Includes County Northeast, (Includes Southeast, Southwest and Northwest sub-areas)
Rural Areas Areas Rural
City of Wichita & 2035 Urban Growth Area Growth Urban 2035 & Wichita of City Growth Areas Growth
6 BROADWAY 125TH 125TH 1ST
10TH 47TH 63RD 24TH 117TH 117TH MADISON 2014 - 2019 Residential Sedgwick HYDRAULIC
109TH
295TH 279TH 109TH PHELPS RAGAN
K96 39TH Subdivision Activity 101ST Bentley 55TH 101ST OHIO MAIN
97TH County Northeast 159TH INTERURBAN 93RD
311TH County Northeast 93RD Mount Hope 127TH
85TH Legend 85TH 5TH
81ST 143RD
95TH 79TH
111TH
Statistical Development Areas 103RD FORD 77TH 77TH SENECA
167TH Small City 2035 Urban Growth Areas Valley Center 199TH 69TH
231ST Park City
263RD 183RD 215TH 151ST Kechi 69TH 247TH Andale RIDGE
Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Areas 61ST KECHI 135TH 61ST RUSH Maize Bel Aire
K254
71ST 87TH County Sub-areas 53RD CHICAGO 53RD
OLIVER 45TH
Established Central Area HOOVER
WOODLAWN ARKANSAS 45TH Colwich MERIDIAN I235 37TH Residential Subdivision Activity 2014-2019 TOBEN WOMER 37TH K96 WEBB Wichita Northeast 2019 29TH
29TH
25TH Wichita North HILLSIDE
2018; 2017 WEST 21ST 359TH 21ST 17TH
PARK County Northwest WINDMILL AMIDON 2016; 2015; 2014 13TH MOSLEY
119TH 13TH
ZOO 9TH MAIN MCLEAN WACO
CENTRAL TOPEKA Wichita Northwest 3RD FE SANTA 2ND Eastborough Andover 4TH 1ST DOUGLAS
WICHITA US54 MAPLE 6TH MORRIS
KELLOGG MCCORMICK EMPORIA LINCOLN EDGEMOOR
Garden Plain Goddard WASHINGTON I135 US54 MARKET HARRY HARRY 15TH MOUNT VERNON
Wichita Central PAWNEE MAIZE SOUTHWEST PAWNEE
383RD 23RD TYLER
HYDRAULIC
SECTIONLINE
GODDARD ROCK Cheney CESSNA Wichita South 31ST Wichita Southeast 31ST K15
LAKE K42
279TH
295TH
311TH 343RD
MACARTHUR 39TH HOOVER 39TH
47TH
SOUTHEAST 47TH Wichita Southwest
I35
55TH CLIFTON BUCKNER 391ST 55TH
63RD
215TH PATRIOT
63RD 143RD 327TH Derby GRAND GROVE MEADOWLARK
71ST 135TH 159TH 79TH
County Southwest 167TH MADISON 231ST
WOODLAWN 183RD . 79TH 83RD Haysville 87TH
87TH GREENWICH
71ST
87TH BLUFF
247TH Clearwater 95TH MERIDIAN 95TH
239TH
SENECA
TRACY
263RD 103RD 199TH 4TH ROSS
103RD 175TH County Southeast
359TH 375TH
2020 Development 407TH 107TH 111TH
HILLSIDE
BROADWAY 111TH
LOUIS
151ST
39TH WEBB
K42 127TH Trends Summary OLIVER Mulvane
7TH 119TH GRICE MAIN Viola 119TH BROADWAY 125TH 125TH 1ST
10TH 47TH 63RD 24TH 117TH 117TH MADISON 2014 - 2019 Commercial Sedgwick HYDRAULIC
109TH
295TH 279TH 109TH PHELPS RAGAN
K96 39TH 101ST Subdivision Activity Bentley 55TH 101ST OHIO MAIN
97TH County Northeast 159TH INTERURBAN 93RD
311TH County Northeast 93RD Mount Hope 127TH
85TH Legend 85TH 5TH
81ST 143RD
95TH 79TH
111TH
Statistical Development Areas 103RD FORD 77TH 77TH SENECA
167TH Small City 2035 Urban Growth Areas Valley Center 199TH 69TH
231ST Park City
263RD 183RD 215TH 151ST Kechi 69TH 247TH Andale RIDGE
Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Areas 61ST KECHI 135TH 61ST RUSH Maize Bel Aire
K254
71ST 87TH County Sub-areas 53RD CHICAGO 53RD
OLIVER 45TH
Established Central Area HOOVER
WOODLAWN ARKANSAS 45TH Colwich MERIDIAN I235 37TH Commercial Subdivision Activity 2014-2019 TOBEN WOMER 37TH K96 WEBB Wichita Northeast 2019 29TH
29TH
25TH Wichita North HILLSIDE
2018; 2017 WEST 21ST 359TH 21ST 17TH
PARK County Northwest WINDMILL AMIDON 2016; 2015; 2014 13TH MOSLEY
119TH 13TH
ZOO 9TH MAIN MCLEAN WACO
CENTRAL TOPEKA Wichita Northwest 3RD FE SANTA 2ND Eastborough Andover 4TH 1ST DOUGLAS
WICHITA US54 MAPLE 6TH MORRIS
KELLOGG MCCORMICK EMPORIA LINCOLN EDGEMOOR
Garden Plain Goddard WASHINGTON I135 US54 MARKET HARRY HARRY 15TH MOUNT VERNON
Wichita Central PAWNEE MAIZE SOUTHWEST PAWNEE
383RD 23RD TYLER
HYDRAULIC
SECTIONLINE
GODDARD ROCK Cheney CESSNA Wichita South 31ST Wichita Southeast 31ST K15
LAKE K42
279TH
295TH
311TH 343RD
MACARTHUR 39TH HOOVER 39TH
47TH
SOUTHEAST 47TH Wichita Southwest
I35
55TH CLIFTON BUCKNER 391ST 55TH
63RD
215TH PATRIOT
63RD 143RD 327TH Derby GRAND GROVE MEADOWLARK
71ST 135TH 159TH 79TH
County Southwest 167TH MADISON 231ST
WOODLAWN 183RD . 79TH 83RD Haysville 87TH
87TH GREENWICH
71ST
87TH BLUFF
247TH Clearwater 95TH MERIDIAN 95TH
239TH
SENECA
TRACY
263RD 103RD 199TH 4TH ROSS
103RD 175TH County Southeast
359TH 375TH
2020 Development 407TH 107TH 111TH
HILLSIDE
BROADWAY 111TH
LOUIS
151ST
39TH WEBB
K42 127TH Trends Summary OLIVER Mulvane
7TH 119TH GRICE MAIN Viola 119TH 2020 Development Trends Summary — Buildable Vacant Lots
Vacant buildable lots are defined as those lots in Wichita which are subdivided, zoned for single-family residential use and have the following municipal services: public water, public sewer and paved streets in place. Once these services are in place the lot becomes buildable and the permit to build a house can be obtained. It does not include infill lots except in the case of major replatting and building of new municipal services.
Residential Buildable Lots Added by 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Area
2017 2018 2019 % Change 2014-2018 2018 5-Year AREA Jan. - Dec. Jan. - Dec. Jan. - Dec. to 2019 Averages
WICHITA CENTRAL 0 0 0 0.0% 3 WICHITA NORTHEAST 122 46 95 106.5% 84 WICHITA NORTH 34 57 37 -35.1% 34 WICHITA NORTHWEST 167 320 302 -5.6% 219 WICHITA SOUTHEAST 126 81 249 207.4% 94 WICHITA SOUTH 21 36 60 0.0% 34 WICHITA SOUTHWEST 0 73 44 0.0% 32
TOTAL 470 613 787 28.4% 500
Residential Building Permits Issued by 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Area
2017 2018 2019 % Change 2014-2018 2018 5-Year AREA Jan. - Dec. Jan. - Dec. Jan. - Dec. to 2019 Averages
WICHITA CENTRAL 0 0 0 0.0% 3 WICHITA NORTHEAST 126 100 76 -24.0% 113 WICHITA NORTH 32 77 47 -39.0% 41 WICHITA NORTHWEST 239 242 246 1.7% 204 WICHITA SOUTHEAST 129 117 102 -12.8% 97 WICHITA SOUTH 78 31 28 -9.7% 38 WICHITA SOUTHWEST 46 50 45 -10.0% 49
TOTAL 650 617 544 -11.8% 544
Residential Buildable Lots Available by 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Area
2017 2018 2019 % Change 2014-2018 2018 5-Year AREA Jan. - Dec. Jan. - Dec. Jan. - Dec. to 2019 Averages
WICHITA CENTRAL 0 0 0 0.0% 3 WICHITA NORTHEAST 374 320 339 5.9% 380 WICHITA NORTH 223 203 193 -4.9% 226 WICHITA NORTHWEST 579 657 713 8.5% 609 WICHITA SOUTHEAST 344 308 455 47.7% 337 WICHITA SOUTH 158 163 195 19.6% 181 WICHITA SOUTHWEST 91 114 113 -0.9% 124 TOTAL 1769 1765 2008 13.8% 1860 9
2020 Development Trends Summary — Buildable Vacant Lots
2018
6.76%
0.00%
10.14%
32.45%
69.45%
55.76%
39.39%
29.0%
COMPARED TO COMPARED
RATE FOR 2019 FOR RATE
2.28
5.26
2.63
2.71
2.64
3.20
0.00
2.86
FOR 2018 FOR
2.51
6.96
4.46
2.90
4.11
4.46
0.00
3.69
FOR 2019 FOR
GROWTH AREAGROWTH AREA GROWTH IN SUPPLY %CHANGE
0
113
195
455
713
193
339
AS AS OF 12-31-19 *(in Years) RATE (in Years) RATE
SINGLE-FAMILY
0
44
60
37
95
249
302
ADDED ADDED
0
45
28
47
76
102
246
1-1-19 TO 12-31-191-1-19 TO 12-31-19 1-1-19
0
114
163
308
657
203
320
1765 544 787 2008
AS AS OF 12-31-18 PERMITS
SINGLE-FAMILY SINGLE-FAMILY SINGLE-FAMILY
BUILDABLE LOTSBUILDABLE BUILDING LOTS BUILDABLE LOTS BUILDABLE SUPPLY ANNUAL SUPPLY ANNUAL
2019 Single-Family Residential Buildable Lot Supply by 2035 Wichita Urban Growth Sub-Area 2035 by Growth Wichita LotUrban Supply Buildable Residential 2019 Single-Family
TOTAL
WICHITA SOUTHWEST WICHITA
WICHITA SOUTH WICHITA
WICHITA SOUTHEAST WICHITA
WICHITA NORTHWEST WICHITA
WICHITA NORTH WICHITA
WICHITA NORTHEAST WICHITA
WICHITA CENTRAL WICHITA *Supply Rate *Supply isRate Single-Family Lots Buildable the calculated atyear by of the by Single-Family end Permitsdividing the issuedyear. during
10 2020 Development Trends Summary — Buildable Vacant Lots
Central Buildable Lot Activity Southeast Buildable Lot Activity 100 500 455
Lots 400 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 2017 2018 2019 308 300 Lots Added Permits Issued Lots Available Lots 249
200 North Buildable Lot Activity 126129 300 117 102 100 81 223 203 193 200 0 2017 2018 2019 Lots Added Permits Issued Lots Available Lots 100 77 57 47 34 32 37 Northwest Buildable Lot Activity 0 2017 2018 2019 800
Lots Added Permits Issued Lots Available 713 700 657 Northeast Buildable Lot Activity 400 374 600 579 339 320 500 300
Lots 400
Lots 320 200 302 300 239 242 246 122126 100 95 200 100 76 167 46 100 0 2017 2018 2019 Lots Added Permits Issued Lots Available 0 2017 2018 2019
South Buildable Lot Activity Lots Added Permits Issued Lots Available 300
Southwest Buildable Lot Activity 195 200 Lots 158 163 200
114 113 100 78 Lots 91 60 100 73 36 21 31 28 46 50 44 45 0 0 2017 2018 2019 0 2017 2018 2019 Lots Added Permits Issued Lots Available Lots Added Permits Issued Lots Available
11 47TH 69TH County Northeast Valley Center 69TH Kechi County Northeast 2019 Vacant Buildable 69TH
County Northwest
K96 95TH 55TH
Single-Family Lots RIDGE 8 61ST 61ST
SENECA KECHI
61ST 61ST 61ST
MERIDIAN 167TH
in Wichita 61ST 103RD Park City
79TH
111TH 63RD
Maize 71ST 87TH 23 K254 53RD
53RD 151ST 53RD CHICAGO Bel Aire
K96 K254 143RD 1ST Colwich 26 12 48 54 HYDRAULIC 45TH
45TH HOOVER
Legend 183RD
BROADWAY ARKANSAS 16 4 39TH 3 37TH 2019 Vacant Buildable 91 WOODLAWN 37TH 37TH Wichita North Lots by Map Section K96
31 WEST 66 1 43 14 29TH
101 - 190 Lots 25 29TH 29TH 29TH GREENWICH
25TH 99 OLIVER 61 - 100 Lots 4 140 Wichita Northeast 159TH 21ST HILLSIDE 21ST 1 1 AMIDON
Wichita Northwest K96 31 - 60 Lots 17TH
127TH 5 49
WEBB
WACO RIDGE 60 8 GROVE 13TH 2 79 WINDMILL I135
11 - 30 Lots 13TH MARKET MOSLEY ZOO 1 1 - 10 Lots 7
1 MAIN CENTRAL 151ST 4TH 113 2ND 1ST DOUGLAS Statistical Development Areas DOUGLAS Wichita Central 16
Eastborough US54
MAIZE TYLER
167TH 74 23 MAPLE Small City 2035 Urban Growth 6TH MCCORMICK LINCOLN Areas KELLOGG LINCOLN 61 TOPEKA HARRY HARRY 15 2
Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Sub- Goddard 1 US54 15 81 I235 MID CONTINENT WEST MOUNT VERNON 52 Areas SOUTHWEST SENECA 65 62 95 I35 PAWNEE 21 PAWNEE County Sub-areas 23RD PAWNEE MERIDIAN K42 25 31ST 31ST Established Central 31ST 2 45 CESSNA K15 31ST Wichita Southeast Wichita South HYDRAULIC
Wichita City Limits 35 K15 78 39TH
HOOVER MACARTHUR 135TH Wichita Southwest
39TH ROCK SOUTHEAST 27 32 47TH 47TH 47TH 18 18 32 9 34 SOUTHEAST
RIDGE 55TH 55TH 55TH
WOODLAWN CLIFTON
K42 WEST
87TH County Southeast
SENECA 63RD 119TH 63RD 63RD PATRIOT 63RD
. County Southwest 99TH 15 143RD 20 71ST 103RD GRAND 71ST
71ST MAIN MEADOWLARK
151ST GREENWICH
County Southeast BUCKNER
2020 Development Haysville Derby
159TH
39TH 127TH 79TH County Southeast MADISON 79TH Trends Summary 79TH
83RD 159TH WOODLAWN Clearwater SENECA 2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics
Residential Permits
4.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.1%
2.0%
0.8%
0.0%
9.0%
1.2%
1.2%
0.9%
0.2%
0.0%
5.1%
0.3%
0.6%
0.4%
0.0%
4.8%
0.2%
2.2%
3.2%
3.5%
7.1%
3.4%
95.1%
28.4%
12.7%
64.8%
21.5%
14.8%
11.2%
100.0%
2
0
3
6
7
3
(0)
81
32
36
14
21
21
16
90
10
85
40
57
62
61
-
-
-
505
159
226
126
382
263
199
1,775
1,688
1,150
2014 – 2018 Average – 2018 2014 Percent – 2018 2014
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
5.4%
1.3%
0.0%
2.6%
2.6%
2.2%
0.1%
0.1%
5.4%
0.2%
0.4%
0.1%
0.1%
7.8%
0.2%
3.3%
3.1%
3.3%
2.5%
4.2%
6.1%
1.9%
10.0%
90.0%
42.2%
12.3%
44.5%
10.5%
16.0%
100.0%
2
1
3
6
1
2
3
20
77
18
38
37
31
78
48
44
47
36
60
88
28
-
-
-
-
143
606
177
112
640
151
230
1,437
2019 Net2019 Percent 2019 of
8
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
76
76 1,294
44
67
21
43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2019
Residential Building Activity Building Residential
by Comprehensive Plan Growth Area Growth Plan Comprehensive by
1
2
1
4
6
3
2
3
20
79
18
38
37
32
78
49
88
47
37
61
89
71
-
-
-
143
614
177
113
707
151
251
1,513
1,370
2019
New Units Demolitions Added Units Added Net Units Added Net Units Added of Net Units
Andover
Mulvane in Sumner Co
Viola
Valley Center
Sedgwick
Park City
Mulvane
Mount Mount Hope
Maize
Kechi
Haysville
Goddard
Garden Plain
Eastborough
Derby
Colwich
Clearwater
Cheney
Bentley
Bel Aire
Andale
Wichita Southwest
Wichita South
Wichita Southeast
Wichita Northwest
Wichita North
Wichita Northeast
Wichita Central
Wichita Central Established Area
Wichita Urban 2035 Growth Area Subtotal
(Sub-areas)
Small Urban 2035 & Cities Growth Areas Subtotal
Regional Total
Sedgwick Co. Total
Small Urban 2035 & City Growth Areas
(Includes County Northeast, Southeast, Northw Southeast, Southw estand Northeast, estCounty sub-areas) (Includes
Rural Areas
City of WichitaCity Urban 2035 & Growth Area Growth Areas 13
2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics
89
44
30
Units
Units
Units
995
368
446
330
973
126
406
951
1,014
2,466
1,793
1,513
8
8
2
26
11
23
184
165
973
165
951
2017
2018
2019
Permits
Permits
Permits
1,014
1,232
1,157
1,141
New Residential Building Permits by Typeby Permits Building New Residential
New Residential Building Permits by Typeby Permits Building New Residential
New Residential Building Permits by Typeby Permits Building New Residential
TOTAL
Five or More or Five
3 & 4 Family 4 & 3
Two Family Two
One Family One
Buildings
NewResidential
TOTAL
Five or More or Five
3 & 4 Family 4 & 3
Two Family Two
One Family One
Buildings
NewResidential
TOTAL
Five or More or Five
3 & 4 Family 4 & 3
Two Family Two
One Family One
Buildings NewResidential
Source: Sedgwick County Appraiser data and annual survey of cities with- in Sedgwick County plus the City of Andover. 14 2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics ECA New Residential Building Permits by Type 2019 New Residential Buildings Permits Units One Family 40 40 Two Family 16 48 3 & 4 Family 0 0 Five or More 0 0 TOTAL 56 88 ECA New Residential Building Permits by Type 2018 New Residential Buildings Permits Units One Family 38 38 Two Family 19 38 3 & 4 Family 0 0 Five or More 2 157 TOTAL 59 233 ECA New Residential Building Permits by Type 2017 New Residential Buildings Permits Units One Family 36 36 Two Family 15 30 3 & 4 Family 1 4 Five or More 4 377 TOTAL 56 447 Net Residential Units Added by School District 2019 Net Percent of 2014-2018 Average 2014-2018 Percent School District Dstrict Name Units AddedNet Units Added Net Units of Net Units Added USD 206 Remington-Whitewater 1 0% 1 0.0% USD 259 Wichita 332 23% 588 33.0% USD 260 Derby 139 10% 122 6.8% USD 261 Haysville 74 5% 44 2.4% USD 262 Valley Center 73 5% 79 4.4% USD 263 Mulvane 22 2% 16 0.9% USD 264 Clearwater 10 1% 15 0.9% USD 265 Goddard 128 9% 135 7.6% USD 266 Maize 373 26% 434 24.4% USD 267 Renwick 22 2% 39 2.2% USD 268 Cheney 7 0% 8 0.4% USD 312 Haven 1 0% 0 0.0% USD 331 Kingman 0 0% 0 0.0% USD 356 Conway Springs 0 0% 0 0.0% USD 369 Burton 0 0% 0 0.0% USD 375 Circle 74 5% 107 6.0% USD 385 Andover 171 12% 186 10.4% USD 394 Rose Hill 7 0% 4 0.2% USD 439 Sedgwick 1 0% 2 0.1% USD 440 Halstead 2 0% 1 0.0% TOTALS 1437 100% 1,781 100.0% 15 2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics
Commercial Permits (Only includes new Buildings and Building Additions)
-
-
-
-
640
1,188
1,268
7,563
1,080
39,350
22,689
11,472
15,941
64,204
32,677
29,979
30,040
19,914
14,004
770,070
260,667
101,166
169,582
567,085
283,140
139,791
200,795
244,131
178,150
585,479
324,796
2,779,706
2,740,355
1,956,282
2014-2018
Average SquareFootage Average
5
0
0
4
1
6
2
0
5
3
2
3
0
0
9
0
1
2
0
3
0
3
9
9
8
42
55
12
21
34
37
180
175
130
2014-2018
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7,525
3,539
3,000
72,995
84,513
13,200
10,378
42,398
34,200
21,360
73,931
713,686
397,449
117,484
461,254
190,841
388,009
319,370
250,138
400,787
215,688
2,646,805
2,573,810
1,838,764
2019
7
0
0
2
0
8
0
0
6
2
2
3
0
0
8
0
0
2
1
1
0
3
9
8
7
35
53
12
18
25
22
146
139
101
Commercial Projects Commercial
2019
Permits SquareFootage Permits Average
by Comprehensive Plan Growth Area Growth ComprehensivePlan by
Wichita Established CentralArea Established Wichita
Andover
Mulvane in Sumner Co MulvaneSumner in
Viola
Valley Center Valley
Sedgwick
Park City Park
Mulvane
Mount Hope Mount
Maize
Kechi
Haysville
Goddard
GardenPlain
Eastborough
Derby
Colwich
Clearwater
Cheney
Bentley
BelAire
Andale
Wichita Southwest Wichita
Wichita South Wichita
Wichita Southeast Wichita
Wichita Northwest Wichita
Wichita North Wichita
Wichita Northeast Wichita
Wichita Central Wichita
Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Area Subtotal Area Growth Urban 2035 Wichita
Small Cities & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Subtotal Areas Growth Urban 2035 &Cities Small
(Sub-areas)
Growth Areas Growth
Regional Total Regional
Sedgwick Co. Total Co. Sedgwick
Small City & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Growth Urban 2035 & City Small
(Includes County Northeast, Southeast, Northwest and Southwest sub-areas) Southwest and Northwest Southeast, Northeast, County (Includes
Rural Areas Areas Rural City of Wichita & 2035 Urban Growth Area Growth Urban 2035 & Wichita of City
16 2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics
2019 Industrial, Warehouse Building Projects 2014-2018 Average Indus. & Warehs. Projects Number Number 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Area of Square Feet % of % Square of Square Feet % of % Square Permits Built Permits Footage Permits Built Permits Footage City of Wichita & 2035 Urban Growth Area (Sub-areas) Wichita Central 4 64,495 8% 4% 15 105,348 24% 8% Wichita Northeast 4 63,442 8% 4% 7 131,631 10% 9% Wichita North 4 60,552 8% 4% 4 105,333 6% 8% Wichita Northwest 3 46,966 6% 3% 3 41,172 5% 3% Wichita Southeast 5 294,249 10% 20% 4 92,441 6% 8% Wichita South 7 293,687 14% 19% 5 84,265 7% 6% Wichita Southwest 7 187,637 14% 12% 6 245,225 10% 17% Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Area Subtotal 34 1,011,028 68% 67% 44 805,415 69% 59% Wichita Established Central Area 9 282,744 18% 19% 22 241,625 30% 18%
Rural Areas 3 21,360 6% 1% 2 8,177 4% 1% (Incl. Co. Northeast, Southeast, Northwest and Southwest) Small City & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Andale - - 0% 0% 0 1,080 0% 0% Bel Aire 1 34,200 2% 2% 2 163,745 3% 12% Bentley 1 3,000 2% 0% - - 0% 0% Cheney 1 2,688 2% 0% 2 15,899 3% 1% Clearwater - - 0% 0% 0 1,000 0% 0% Colwich - - 0% 0% 0 480 0% 0% Derby 1 55,432 2% 4% 1 4,230 1% 0% Eastborough - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Garden Plain - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Goddard - - 0 0 1 4,748 2% 1% Haysville - - 0% 0% 0 750 0% 0% Kechi 1 6,000 2% 0% 2 21,541 4% 2% Maize 4 65,130 8% 4% 2 42,629 3% 3% Mount Hope - - 0% 0% 0 640 0% 0% Mulvane - - 0% 0% 1 4,492 1% 0% Park City 4 308,348 8% 20% 4 248,451 7% 20% Sedgwick - - 0% 0% 1 10,002 1% 1% Valley Center - - 0 0 1 7,027 2% 1% Viola - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Small Cities & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Subtotal 13 474,798 26% 32% 18 526,714 28% 40%
Sedgwick Co. Total 50 1,507,186 100% 100% 64 1,340,305 99% 100%
Mulvane in Sumner Co - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Andover - - 0% 0% 0 1,525 1% 0%
Regional Total 50 1,507,186 100% 100% 64 1,341,830 100% 100%
2019 Retail Building Projects 2014-2018 Average Retail Projects Number Number 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Area of Square Feet % of % Square of Square Feet % of % Square Permits Built Permits Footage Permits Built Permits Footage City of Wichita & 2035 Urban Growth Area (Sub-areas) Wichita Central 9 44,198 20% 8% 12 90,226 21% 13% Wichita Northeast 11 143,782 24% 26% 13 278,713 24% 42% Wichita North 1 5,203 2% 1% 1 7,984 3% 1% Wichita Northwest 7 141,183 15% 25% 9 103,246 16% 15% Wichita Southeast 1 15,554 2% 3% 3 40,132 6% 7% Wichita South 5 94,322 11% 17% 5 28,787 7% 3% Wichita Southwest 1 2,394 2% 0% 2 34,305 3% 7% Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Area Subtotal 35 446,636 76% 79% 45 583,394 78% 85% Wichita Established Central Area 11 47,657 24% 8% 18 159,136 25% 17%
Rural Areas - - 0 0 1 2,794 2% 1% (Incl. Co. Northeast, Southeast, Northwest and Southwest) Small City & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Andale - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Bel Aire - - 0% 0% 0 292 0% 0% Bentley - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Cheney 1 851 2% 0% - - 0% 0% Clearwater - - 0 0 1 6,563 2% 2% Colwich - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Derby 2 4,089 4% 1% 4 46,360 7% 6% Eastborough - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Garden Plain - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Goddard - - 0 0 1 13,493 2% 2% Haysville - - 0 0 1 4,358 2% 1% Kechi - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Maize 2 19,383 4% 3% 1 2,193 2% 1% Mount Hope - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Mulvane - - 0% 0% 1 3,522 1% 0% Park City 4 89,101 9% 16% 1 11,448 3% 2% Sedgwick - - 0% 0% 0 1,470 0% 0% Valley Center 1 775 2% 0% 1 6,530 2% 1% Viola - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Small Cities & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Subtotal 10 114,199 22% 20% 11 96,228 17% 13%
Sedgwick Co. Total 45 560,835 98% 99% 57 682,416 96% 99%
Mulvane in Sumner Co - - 0% 0% - - 0% 0% Andover 1 3,000 2% 1% 2 7,483 5% 1% Regional Total 46 563,835 100% 100% 59 689,899 100% 100% 17 2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics
2019 Institutional Building Projects 2014-2018 Average Institutional Projects Number Number 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Area of Square Feet % of % Square of Square Feet % of % Square Permits Built Permits Footage Permits Built Permits Footage City of Wichita & 2035 Urban Growth Area (Sub-areas) Wichita Central 2 49,072 9% 17% 6 73,568 22% 23% Wichita Northeast 5 49,006 22% 17% 5 81,504 19% 19% Wichita North 2 8,176 9% 3% 2 13,289 9% 5% Wichita Northwest 4 35,729 17% 12% 3 62,509 11% 13% Wichita Southeast 1 5,339 4% 2% 2 66,682 6% 9% Wichita South - - 0 0 1 8,291 5% 2% Wichita Southwest 1 810 4% 0% 0 3,610 5% 5% Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Area Subtotal 15 148,132 65% 50% 20 309,452 66% 65% Wichita Established Central Area 5 72,930 22% 25% 10 105,559 21% 19%
Rural Areas - - 0 0 1 2,860 3% 1% (Incl. Co. Northeast, Southeast, Northwest and Southwest) Small City & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Andale - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Bel Aire - - 0 0 0 3,811 2% 6% Bentley - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Cheney - - 0 0 0 3,796 11% 10% Clearwater - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Colwich - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Derby 3 28,712 13% 10% 2 35,472 6% 12% Eastborough - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Garden Plain - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Goddard 2 38,904 9% 13% 1 11,799 7% 6% Haysville 1 6,750 4% 2% 1 24,630 6% 9% Kechi 1 7,200 4% 2% 1 10,705 3% 3% Maize - - 0 0 1 14,374 7% 7% Mount Hope - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Mulvane - - 0 0 1 7,927 4% 5% Park City - - 0 0 0 768 4% 1% Sedgwick - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Valley Center 1 6,750 4% 2% 1 5,283 9% 4% Viola - - 0 0 0 1,188 5% 1% Small Cities & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Subtotal 8 88,316 35% 30% 8 119,753 31% 33%
Sedgwick Co. Total 23 236,448 100% 80% 29 432,065 99% 99% - - 0% 0% Mulvane in Sumner Co - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Andover - 60,148 0 20% 0 7,111 5% 4%
Regional Total 23 296,596 100% 100% 29 439,176 100% 100%
2019 Office & Other Commercial Building Projects 2014-2018 Average Office & Oth Cmrcl Projects Number Number 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Area of Square Feet % of % Square of Square Feet % of % Square Permits Built Permits Footage Permits Built Permits Footage City of Wichita & 2035 Urban Growth Area (Sub-areas) Wichita Central 7 57,923 32% 21% 4 55,654 15% 21% Wichita Northeast 5 144,577 23% 52% 9 93,630 31% 32% Wichita North - - 0 0 1 51,545 6% 23% Wichita Northwest 4 26,260 18% 9% 5 37,205 17% 13% Wichita Southeast 1 4,228 5% 2% 0 1,540 4% 2% Wichita South - - 0 0 1 18,448 6% 7% Wichita Southwest - - 0 0 0 - 0% 0% Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Area Subtotal 17 232,988 77% 83% 20 258,021 71% 81% Wichita Established Central Area 1 57,923 5% 21% 5 60,764 14% 20%
Rural Areas - - 0 0 0 173 3% 0% (Incl. Co. Northeast, Southeast, Northwest and Southwest) Small City & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Andale - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Bel Aire - - 0 0 0 1,735 3% 1% Bentley - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Cheney - - 0 0 0 219 4% 1% Clearwater - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Colwich - - 0 0 0 788 4% 2% Derby 2 29,251 9% 10% 2 15,103 10% 6% Eastborough - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Garden Plain - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Goddard 1 3,494 5% 1% - - 0% 0% Haysville 1 3,628 5% 1% 0 242 3% 0% Kechi - - 0 0 0 432 4% 1% Maize - - 0 0 1 5,008 6% 2% Mount Hope - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Mulvane - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Park City - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Sedgwick - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Valley Center - - 0 0 1 3,848 4% 2% Viola - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Small Cities & 2035 Urban Growth Areas Subtotal 4 36,373 18% 13% 6 27,375 22% 10%
Sedgwick Co. Total 21 269,361 95% 96% 26 285,569 93% 91%
Mulvane in Sumner Co - - 0 0 - - 0% 0% Andover 1 9,847 5% 4% 2 23,231 9% 11% Regional Total 22 279,208 100% 100% 28 308,801 100% 100% 18 2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics
Commercial Projects by School District (For School Districts Serving the Region) 2019 2019 USD 2019% 2014-2018 2014-2018 Number 2019 Projects Sq. Feet in USD Avg. Annual Avg. Annual School District District Name of Permits Square Feet Square FeetSchool Projects # of Projects Square Feet USD 206 Remington-Whitewater 0 - 0 - USD 259 Wichita 70 1,092,970 - 107 1,519,899 USD 260 Derby 11 385,852 7,294 2% 12 184,130 USD 261 Haysville 6 46,860 - 3 36,628 USD 262 Valley Center 5 287,678 6,750 2% 6 205,843 USD 263 Mulvane 1 3,381 2 15,941 USD 264 Clearwater 0 - 1 7,563 USD 265 Goddard 9 171,800 30,230 18% 6 70,819 USD 266 Maize 17 256,792 - 19 250,807 USD 267 Renwick 0 - 2 7,404 USD 268 Cheney 2 3,539 - 2 19,914 USD 312 Haven 0 - 0 640 USD 331 Kingman 0 - 0 - USD 356 Conway Springs 0 - 1 2,448 USD 369 Burton 0 - 0 - USD 375 Circle 11 289,732 10 381,738 USD 385 Andover 10 83,841 27,874 33% 6 57,634 USD 394 Rose Hill 3 21,360 1 2,820 USD 439 Sedgwick 0 - 1 11,472 USD 440 Halstead 1 3,000 1 4,007 TOTAL 146 2,646,805 72,148 3% 180 2,779,706
19 2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics Demographics
Regional Annexation Activity CITY 2010 Total Number of 2019 Year End 2019 Square Miles Annexations Total Square Miles* Andale 0.6 0.6 Bel Aire 6.9 6.9 Bentley 0.3 0.3 Cheney 2.1 2.3 Clearwater 1.9 1.9 Colwich 1.3 1.4 Derby 9.6 2 10.3 Eastborough 0.4 0.4 Garden Plain 0.6 1 1.0 Goddard 4.6 1 5.0 Haysville 4.5 1 4.6 Kechi 6.0 6.1 Maize 9.0 1 9.4 Mount Hope 1.4 1.4 Mulvane* 2.2 2.2 Park City 9.6 2 9.8 Sedgwick* 0.3 0.3 Valley Center 6.9 7.1 Viola 0.2 0.2 Wichita 163.3 6 165.8
Andover 10.2 10.4
*Totals reflect city area in Sedgw ick County. Source: Sedgw ick County Geographic Information Systems 20
2020 Development Trends Summary — Permit Activity & Demographics
0.84%
0.49%
1.78%
0.81%
0.64%
1.74%
1.46%
3.47%
2.54%
1.32%
0.91%
2.82%
2.52%
1.48%
2.49%
0.66%
0.14%
1.70%
1.40%
1.49%
1.30%
1.66%
2.69%
1.48%
-0.09%
Projected
GrowthRate
25Yr. Annual
200
450
800
800
9,790
7,100
1,020
6,850
3,560
8,040
1,000
1,880
3,590
2,890
1,340
1,120
36,420
13,650
15,650
33,750
13,140
18,320
448,080
629,440
610,000
Projection
Community
2035Population
InvestmentsPlan
0.37%
1.57%
0.34%
0.23%
0.00%
0.84%
1.00%
0.89%
0.87%
4.44%
0.96%
0.51%
1.10%
0.71%
1.30%
0.76%
0.33%
0.42%
2.33%
0.78%
-0.06%
-0.46%
-0.18%
-0.56%
-0.11%
GrowthRate
9-Yr.Annual
(PermitData)
985
130
210
800
905
735
525
995
7,355
7,900
5,535
5,055
2,080
4,795
1,420
2,555
2,175
8,325
13,565
35,700
11,335
24,900
Estimate
528,220
513,670
390,240
Population
12/31/2019
990
130
192
813
849
773
530
928
Regional Population ProjectionRegional Population
6,822
7,297
5,121
3,420
1,909
4,344
1,327
2,481
2,094
6,769
2010
11,791
37,214
10,826
22,158
Census
511,146
498,365
382,368
Population
CITY
RegionTotals
SumnerCoMulvane pt
Andover
Unincorp.Sedg. Co
Wichita
Viola
ValleyCenter
Sedgwick*
ParkCity
Mulvane*
MountHope
Maize
Kechi
Haysville
Goddard
GardenPlain
Eastborough
Derby
Colwich
Clearwater
Cheney
Bentley
BelAire
Andale
SedgwickCo.Totals *Numbers reflect an estimate of the Sedgwick County portion of this city. this of portion County Sedgwick the of estimate an reflect *Numbers
21 125TH 125TH #*1ST
#* I135 127TH MADISON #*
151ST 117TH
231ST #*
199TH 117TH
247TH
183RD
295TH
263RD 279TH 117TH Sedgwick 79TH
#*
95TH
RIDGE
63RD
10TH 24TH
39TH 109TH
87TH
I135 167TH 2019 Residential 215TH 109TH #* #*
109TH PHELPS
OHIO I135 #*
Bentley HYDRAULIC
55TH 119TH Construction & Demolition Mount Hope 135TH 101ST 101ST 101ST 101ST #* #* County Northeast 159TH
97TH Valley Center I135 Kechi
HILLSIDE 127TH
County Northeast 47TH 93RD 93RD 231ST 93RD
311TH 93RD
93RD 247TH #*
K96 #*I135
SENECA 143RD #* #*#*#* 111TH 71ST #* 85TH
103RD #* 5TH 5TH5TH5TH
279TH 295TH
263RD 85TH Statistical Development Areas 85TH #*#* #*#* #* MAIN#* I135 #*
151ST 81ST 215TH #* 215TH 77TH 183RD #* FORD FORD 77TH Small City 2035 Urban Growth Areas 77TH 199TH #* 77TH FORD SENECA I135 INTERURBAN #*
K96 #* 95TH 55TH 69TH 69TH Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Areas #*") 167TH #* ") 247TH 69TH #* #*#*#*#* #*#* Kechi #* #*#* #* #* ")")")
RIDGE Park City ")") 79TH Andale KECHI ") 61ST 61ST County Sub-areas #* 103RD 61ST 61ST 61ST 61ST KECHI RUSH #*#* 61ST #* #* I135 ")") 61ST #* #*#* #*")")") Bel Aire 55TH #* MERIDIAN #*#* #*
#* 63RD ") I135 ")
71ST ") ") 87TH 53RD 53RD 53RD K254 #*") ANDALE #* #*") #* #* #*
OLIVER #*
Established Central Area 1ST #* #*") 231ST ") 279TH #* #*#* #* I135 #* #* #*#*#* ")#*")") 53RD #* Maize #* #* #* #*#* #*#*)"#* #* #*#* #* #*#*#*#* ")")")") #* #*#*#* #*#* #* ")#*#* #* #*#* #*#*")#*") +$ #*#* 127TH #* #*#*#* #* I135#*#*#* K254#* ") 45TH Residential Units Colwich 45TH #*#*#* #*#*
#* I235 HOOVER #*#* 247TH #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#* #*#*#* HILLSIDE #* #*#*#* ARKANSAS $+ #* #* +$ #* WOMER 39TH #*#* #*#*#* GREENWICH 37TH #*#*#* I235 37TH #*#*#*#*#* I235 37TH -20 - -5 #* #*#*#*RIDGE #* #*#*#* 37TH #*#*#* #*#* #*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#* #* #*#* I235 K96 Wichita#* Northeast #* 159TH ") #* #* #* #*
#*#*#*#* HYDRAULIC ROCK
#* #* OLIVER 29TH #*#*#* #* Wichita North 29TH #*#* -4 - -2 #* I235 I135 #* #* 199TH #* #*#*#*#* #* #* #* #* #* WEST #*#* 295TH 29TH #* #* #* K96 #*#* #* #* #*#* #* #*#*#*#* #*#*#*#*#* I235 25TH #* #*#*#*#*#* #* Wichita Northwest #*#* #* ") #* #* #* 21ST ")") RIDGE 21ST 21ST -1 HILLSIDE #*#* ") 21ST ") #*#* I235 #*#*#* AMIDON #*#* #* 17TH #* #*#* #*#*
WOODLAWN #* County Northwest +$ #* #*#* #*#*#* I235 #* 143RD #*#*#* #* #*#*#*#*#* #* 13TH #* ")") #*#*#* #*#*#*#*#*#* WACO #* #* 13TH ")") 0 - 1 #*#*#* 135TH 13TH #* #* #* 119TH WINDMILL #*#* +$ #* ") ") MOSLEY #* $ 359TH #* #* +
375TH #* 13TH ZOO #* MARKET #*#* #* #* #* MCLEAN ") 9TH#* ") #* #*#*#*#* I235 CENTRAL CENTRAL ") #* #* 8TH GROVE #* #* #*#* TYLER CENTRAL #* Eastborough #* #*#* I35 #* 2 #*#*#* +$ 2ND +$ #* #* 311TH 4TH #*#* ") 391ST #*#* I235 1ST 407TH #* ") #* #* DOUGLAS #* #* #* #* DOUGLAS TOPEKA Andover #* +$DOUGLAS #* #* ") ") KELLOGG WEBB ") US54 US54 #* #* MAPLE " ") ") +$ ") 3 - 4 #*#* #* MAPLE #* #* #* )") I35 #*#*#*#* 327TH 6TH #*#* #*#* SENECA ") I35 #*#*#*#* LINCOLN #*#*
6TH #* LINCOLN LINCOLN #* WASHINGTON MAIN #* #*#*#* #* I235 #* #* #*#*#* #* #*#*#*#*#* SOUTHEAST #* 383RD Garden Plain #*#* #*#* #*#* US54 #* #*#* I235 Wichita Central ") $+ #* #*#*#* #*#* HARRY EMPORIA HARRY #* #* ") #* 143RD #* 151ST US54 #*#*183RD KELLOGG #* 5 - 120 15TH MID #*#* #*#*#* 15TH HARRY Goddard #* #* #* #*#*#*#* +$ #* ") #* #* MOUNT VERNON #* #*#*#* #* #* #* #*#*#* MCLEAN #* #* #*#*#* CONTINENT #*#* #* #* #* #* I35 PAWNEE #* #*PAWNEE #*#* #* I235 SOUTHWEST #*#*#* BROADWAY #* 167TH PAWNEE #* $
263RD ++$ MAIZE
215TH #* LINE #*#* 391ST 375TH 23RD #*
#*#*#* #*#* SECTION K42
WEST 31ST 31ST #* #* Cheney 31ST CESSNA I235 31ST #* #* K15 31ST #* #* 31ST #*#* 31ST 6TH 31ST I135 ")#*#*#*#* LAKE #* #* #* #* K42 I235 ") #* MAIN #* Wichita Southeast #* K15 I235 I235 I235 I35 39TH
#* 295TH K42 I135 359TH MACARTHUR TYLER #* #*#*
407TH SOUTHEAST
LAKE 39TH I35 #*#* #* OLIVER #* Wichita Southwest #*#*#* #* Wichita South
#* 127TH #*#* #* 47TH ROCK #* #* 47TH #*
279TH 47TH #* 47TH
159TH 343RD #* ") 47TH HOOVER #* #*
") SENECA 55TH 375TH ") 199TH ") 55TH #* 55TH #*
55TH #* WOODLAWN #* #*#*#*#*
I35 #*#* #*
WEST 143RD
CLIFTON #*
RIDGE 63RD 63RD 87TH 63RD K15 #* #* PATRIOT#*#* 247TH 63RD #* #*
63RD #* I35 #* #* ROCK #*#* K15 #*#* ")#*#*MAIN #*#* #* I35 #* #* #* 99TH #* GRAND 71ST#* GROVE #* 71ST 327TH 71ST MEADOWLARK
71ST GREENWICH BUCKNER #* MAIN #*#* #* #* #*#* #* County Southwest #*#* #* Haysville Derby : 79TH #*#* #*#* MADISON)"#*#* 79TH #* 79TH 79TH MARKET
79TH 79TH #* #*83RD
391ST 55TH
I35 159TH #* 87TH 87TH 199TH 87TH
87TH #*#*#*#* K15 39TH
71ST #*
WOODLAWN 95TH
103RD
231ST BLUFF 247TH 95TH 407TH 95TH 95TH #*K15
Clearwater HILLSIDE #* SENECA
MERIDIAN I35 #*#*#* GREENWICH #* 87TH 103RD 103RD 311TH ROSS #* 103RD #* 295TH 103RD 103RD
175TH 103RD 103RD 239TH #* County Southeast 159TH #* #* OLIVER #*#* 2020 Development 103RD 4TH
107TH 103RD HYDRAULIC
WEBB #* #* 111TH 111TH 111TH
111TH 111TH 111TH #*
199TH 247TH 279TH 111TH 359TH 111TH Mulvane #* 151ST #* . Viola I35 .
Trends Summary 2ND 55TH 7TH 119TH #*K15 119TH
135TH
215TH
183RD MAIN 119TH GRICE 119TH
263RD 125TH 125TH 1ST
I135
127TH MADISON
151ST 117TH 231ST
199TH 117TH
247TH
183RD
295TH
263RD 279TH
117TH Sedgwick 79TH
95TH
RIDGE
63RD
10TH 24TH
39TH 109TH
87TH
I135 167TH 2019 Commercial 215TH 109TH 109TH PHELPS *#
OHIO I135
Bentley HYDRAULIC
55TH 119TH Construction Square Footage Mount Hope 135TH 101ST 101ST 101ST 101ST County Northeast 159TH
97TH Valley Center I135 Kechi
HILLSIDE 127TH
County Northeast 47TH 93RD 93RD 231ST 93RD
311TH 93RD
93RD 247TH
K96 I135
SENECA
143RD 111TH
71ST *# 85TH
103RD 5TH 5TH5TH5TH
279TH 295TH Statistical Development Areas 263RD 85TH 85TH MAIN *#I135
151ST 81ST 215TH *# 215TH 77TH 183RD FORD FORD 77TH 77TH 199TH 77TH FORD Small City 2035 Urban Growth Areas SENECA *#
INTERURBAN I135
K96 95TH 55TH 69TH 69TH
Wichita 2035 Urban Growth Sub-Areas 167TH 247TH 69TH Kechi
RIDGE Park City Andale KECHI 79TH 61ST 61ST 103RD 61ST KECHI *# County Sub-areas 61ST 61ST *#*##61ST*# *#
61ST RUSH 61ST * I135 Bel Aire 55TH MERIDIAN
I135 63RD
71ST 87TH 53RD
53RD 53RD K254
ANDALE OLIVER
1ST # 231ST Established Central Area 279TH # *# *# *# * 53RD *# Maize*# I135
I135 K254 45TH 127TH Colwich 45TH *# *#
I235 HOOVER
Commercial Square Feet 247TH HILLSIDE *# *#WOMER ARKANSAS 39TH
#* GREENWICH 37TH I235 37TH *# I235 37TH *# RIDGE *# 200 - 2000 37TH # *# * I235 K96*# Wichita Northeast *# *# *# *# 159TH
# HYDRAULIC *# * *# ROCK *# Wichita North OLIVER 29TH *# 29TH
I235 I135 199TH
2001 - 20000 WEST *# 295TH 29TH *# *#K96*# *# 25TH #*# Wichita Northwest I235 *#**#*# 21ST *# RIDGE *# 21ST 21ST *# HILLSIDE *# 20001 - 50000 21ST *# *# I235 *# *# *# AMIDON 17TH *# *# County Northwest WOODLAWN *# I235 13TH 143RD WACO 13TH *# *# 135TH 13TH *# 119TH WINDMILL *# *# MOSLEY *#
50001 - 200000 359TH *# 375TH 13TH ZOO MARKET MCLEAN 9TH *# I235 CENTRAL CENTRAL
8TH GROVE
TYLER CENTRAL *# Eastborough I35 *# *# 2ND*# *# *# # 311TH 4TH *# * 200001 - 253000 391ST I235 1ST 407TH *# *# *# DOUGLAS *#DOUGLAS *# DOUGLAS *#TOPEKA Andover *# *#*# *# *# KELLOGG WEBB US54 US54 MAPLE *#MAPLE #I35 *# 327TH 6TH *# * *# *# SENECA
6TH *# LINCOLN LINCOLN I35 LINCOLN WASHINGTON
*# MAIN *# I235 *#*# SOUTHEAST 383RD Garden Plain *# US54 I235 Wichita Central
HARRY EMPORIA HARRY
143RD 151ST US54 183RD KELLOGG MID *#*# *# HARRY 15TH Goddard *# *# *# 15TH *# MOUNT VERNON MCLEAN *# CONTINENT I35 PAWNEE I235 SOUTHWEST PAWNEE
BROADWAY 167TH PAWNEE
263RD *# MAIZE
215TH LINE # 391ST * 375TH 23RD
SECTION *# K42 *# WEST 31ST*# 31ST Cheney 31ST CESSNA I235 31ST K15 31ST 31ST 31ST 6TH 31ST I135 LAKE K42 I235 *#MAIN Wichita Southeast K15 I235 I235 I235 I35 39TH 295TH K42 # I135 *# 359TH MACARTHUR *#*#*# TYLER *# **# *#*# 407TH # SOUTHEAST *# LAKE 39TH * # *# I35 * *# OLIVER Wichita Southwest Wichita South *#
*# 127TH 47TH ROCK 47TH *#
279TH 47TH *# 47TH
159TH 343RD 47TH *# HOOVER *#
SENECA 55TH
375TH 199TH 55TH 55TH
55TH WOODLAWN
I35
WEST 143RD *# CLIFTON *#
RIDGE 63RD 63RD 87TH 63RD K15 PATRIOT
247TH 63RD
63RD *#
I35 ROCK
K15 MAIN
I35 *# 99TH GRAND 71ST GROVE 71ST*# 327TH 71ST MEADOWLARK *#
71ST *#
GREENWICH BUCKNER MAIN County Southwest Haysville Derby *# : 79TH MADISON 79TH 79TH
79TH 79TH 79TH 83RD MARKET*# *#
391ST 55TH I35 87TH 159TH
87TH 199TH 87TH
87TH K15 *# 39TH 71ST *#
WOODLAWN 95TH
103RD
231ST BLUFF 247TH 95TH
407TH 95TH 95TH K15
Clearwater HILLSIDE SENECA
MERIDIAN I35 GREENWICH 87TH 103RD 103RD 311TH ROSS 103RD 295TH 103RD 103RD
175TH 103RD 103RD 239TH County Southeast 159TH OLIVER
2020 Development 103RD 4TH
107TH 103RD HYDRAULIC
WEBB 111TH 111TH 111TH
111TH 111TH 111TH
199TH 247TH 279TH 111TH
359TH 111TH Mulvane 151ST . Viola I35 .
Trends Summary 2ND 55TH 7TH 119TH K15 119TH
135TH
215TH
183RD MAIN 119TH GRICE 119TH
263RD