DOCSLIB.ORG

State Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Hazard Mitigation Plan Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 By the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Team led by the Adjutant General’s Department Kansas Division of Emergency Management 2800 Southwest Topeka Boulevard Topeka, Kansas 66611-1287 (785) 274-1406 This plan supersedes the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan dated 2007. Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan Final November 2010 Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 1.2 Purpose 1.1 1.3 Adoption by the State 1.2 1.4 Compliance with Federal Laws and Regulations 1.3 1.5 Authorities 1.4 2 Planning Process 2.1 2.1 Documentation and the Planning Process 2.1 2.1.1 Evolution of the State Hazard Mitigation Plan 2.2 2.1.2 2010 Plan Update Process 2.4 2.2 Coordination among Agencies 2.16 2.3 Integration with Other Planning Efforts, Programs, and Initiatives 2.18 2.3.1 Integration with Local Plans 2.19 2.3.2 Challenges in Integration 2.19 3 Risk Assessment 3.2 3.1 Analysis of State Development Trend 3.3 3.1.1 Growth 3.3 3.1.2 Population 3.3 3.1.3 Social Vulnerability. 3.12 3.1.4 Land Use and Development Trends 3.15 3.1.5 Exposure of Built Environment 3.19 3.2 Hazard Identification. 3.23 3.2.1 State Plan Hazard Identification 3.23 3.2.2 Local Plans Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment 3.33 3.3 Hazard Profiles and Vulnerability 3.34 3.3.1 Agricultural Infestation 3.36 3.3.2 Dam and Levee Failure 3.42 3.3.3 Drought 3.54 3.3.4 Earthquake 3.74 3.3.5 Expansive Soils 3.80 3.3.6 Extreme Temperatures 3.83 3.3.7 Flood 3.93 3.3.8 Fog 3.111 3.3.9 Hailstorm 3.113 3.3.10 Hazardous Materials. 3.132 3.3.11 Land Subsidence 3.155 3.3.12 Landslide 3.159 3.3.13 Lightning 3.163 3.3.14 Major Disease Outbreak 3.168 3.3.15 Radiological 3.176 3.3.16 Soil Erosion and Dust 3.179 3.3.17 Terrorism, Agri-Terrorism, and Civil Disorder 3.183 3.3.18 Tornado 3.186 3.3.19 Utility/Infrastructure Failure 3.209 3.3.20 Wildfire 3.214 3.3.21 Windstorm 3.222 3.3.22 Winter Storm 3.235 3.3.23 Section Summary 3.252 Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan Final i November 2010 3.4 State Facilities: Vulnerability and Potential Losses 3.253 3.5 RESOURCES 3.263 4 Mitigation Strategy. 4.2 4.1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives 4.2 4.1.1 2010 Updated Goals and Objectives 4.3 4.1.2 Process for Updating Goals and Objectives 4.4 4.2 State Capability Assessment 4.7 4.2.1 State Agencies and Mitigation-Related Programs 4.8 4.2.2 State Policies and Regulations 4.31 4.2.3 State Funding Capabilities 4.33 4.2.4 Changes in Capabilities since 2007 4.34 4.2.5 Assessment of Opportunities for Improvement 4.36 4.3 Local Capability Assessment 4.43 4.3.1 Local Policies, Programs, and Capabilities 4.43 4.4 Mitigation Actions 4.49 4.4.1 Identifying, Evaluating, and Prioritizing Mitigation Actions 4.49 4.4.2 2010 Updated Mitigation Actions 4.52 4.5 Funding Sources 4.58 4.5.1 Federal Funding Sources 4.58 4.5.2 State Funding Sources 4.66 4.5.3 Local Funding Sources 4.66 4.5.4 Private Funding Sources 4.66 4.5.5 Funding for Mitigation Actions 2004 to 2010 4.67 5 Coordination of Local Mitigation Plans 5.2 5.1 Local Funding and Technical Assistance 5.2 5.1.1 Background 5.2 5.1.2 Process to Provide Local Assistance 5.3 5.2 Local Plan Integration 5.5 5.2.1 Review and Approval of Local Plans 5.5 5.2.2 Linking Local Plans with the State Plan 5.6 5.2.3 Challenges in Plan Integration 5.7 5.3 Prioritizing Local Assistance 5.8 5.3.1 Criteria for Planning Grants 5.8 5.3.3 Successes and Challenges of Prioritization 5.10 6 Plan Maintenance Process 6.2 6.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan 6.2 6.1.1 Plan Monitoring and Evaluation 6.3 6.1.2 Plan Updating and Maintenance 6.5 6.1.3 Successes and Challenges to Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan 6.8 6.2 Monitoring Progress of Mitigation Actions 6.9 6.2.1 Monitoring Action Implementation and Closeouts 6.9 6.2.2 Reviewing Progress on Achieving Goals 6.11 6.2.3 Successes and Challenges to Monitoring Progress of Mitigation Actions 6.12 Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan Final ii November 2010 1 Introduction This chapter introduces the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan; its purpose and organization, provide evidence of plan adoption, and includes assurances regarding compliance with federal statutes and regulations as they pertain to federal mitigation grant funding and the state statutes that authorize mitigation programs and organizations in Kansas. Kansas has experienced a wide variety of disasters throughout the years. Many events have severely impacted the state’s people, property, economy, and environment. According to the Insurance Information Institute, Kansas ranked tenth in 2008 among the United States in terms of catastrophic losses ($638 million). Kansas is vulnerable to a wide variety of natural, technological, and societal hazards. Therefore, the government of Kansas has made a commitment to develop and implement a statewide mitigation program to eliminate or minimize its vulnerabilities to hazards. As defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), mitigation is ―any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life and property from a hazard event.‖ The statewide program is intended to encompass actions by the State of Kansas as well as its local governments. Only through a comprehensive, coordinated effort at all levels can the communities of Kansas become resilient to the effects of future disasters. To head up this effort, the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Team (KHMT), a cooperative group of representatives of state agencies and other interested parties involved in mitigation, was established in the 1990s to develop and coordinate implementation of a statewide hazard mitigation program. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan is to guide hazard mitigation to better protect the people and property of the state. It demonstrates the state’s commitment to reducing risks from hazards and serves as a tool to help decision makers direct mitigation activities and resources. The planning process is continual. The KHMT reviews the plan annually and updates it every three years and or needed based on changes in priorities, disaster events, and funding availability. The next update of the plan is scheduled to begin in January 2013. This 2010 update to the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan details the hazards to which Kansas is most vulnerable and the state’s commitment to mitigating them. It was developed by the KHMT pursuant to the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-390) and the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan Final 1.2 November 2010 implementing regulations set forth by the Interim Final Rule published in the Federal Register on January, 2008 (44 CFR §201.4). While the act emphasized the need for mitigation plans and more coordinated mitigation planning and implementation efforts, the regulations established the requirements that state hazard mitigation plans must meet in order for a state to be eligible for certain federal disaster assistance and hazard mitigation funding under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Act (P.L. 93-288). Specifically, the purpose of the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan and the associated planning process is to: Create a statewide vision for a disaster resilient future and define the state’s goals for hazard mitigation programming; Provide an effective mechanism to promote interagency coordination of Kansas’ state agency programs related to hazard mitigation; Ensure that all the hazards threatening Kansas are identified, evaluated, and addressed with a priority reflecting the risk they pose to the state; Comply with federal requirements as they pertain to mitigation in a coordinated and integrated manner; Provide an effective mechanism to plan, budget, monitor, and evaluate mitigation efforts; Educate state and local officials, as well as the public, regarding the hazards threatening Kansas and methods to mitigate them; and Establish and define programs and policies to improve mitigation planning and programming at the local level. 1.2 Organization This plan is organized around FEMA’s mitigation planning process and is divided into six chapters with supporting appendices: Chapter 1 Introduction includes the state’s adoption of the plan and assurances that the state will comply with all applicable federal statutes and regulations. Chapter 2 Planning Process explains the planning process, including how the plan was prepared, who was involved, and how it was integrated with other related planning efforts. Chapter 3 Risk Assessment features the risk assessment, which identifies the type and location of hazards that can affect Kansas, analyzes the state’s vulnerability to the hazards identified, and serves as the factual basis for the mitigation strategy. Chapter 4 Mitigation Strategy provides the state’s mitigation blueprint. Specifically, it includes goals and objectives, state and local capabilities, mitigation activities, and funding sources. Chapter 5 Coordination of Local Mitigation Planning describes the state’s role in funding, developing, coordinating, and approving local mitigation plans, and how the state prioritizes funding for local mitigation plans and projects. Chapter 6 Plan Maintenance Process presents the method the KHMT uses to monitor, evaluate, and update the plan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South-Central Kansas (Homeland Security Region G) Multi-Hazard, Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Plan
    South-Central Kansas (Homeland Security Region G) Multi-Hazard, Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Plan Prepared For and Developed With the Jurisdictions Within and Including: Butler County, Cowley County, Harper County, Harvey County, Kingman County, Marion County, McPherson County, Reno County, Rice County , Sedgwick County and Sumner County December, 2013 Prepared By: Blue Umbrella TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... Executive-1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING COMMITTEE .....................................................Hazard-1 RESOLUTIONS OF ADOPTION .............................................................................. Resolutions-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING PROCESS .................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 .......................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Hazard Mitigation Planning Process ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Buchanan's Betrayal of Walker of Kansas. 51 During the Fifties the Territorial Government of Kansas and the Possibility of That
    Buchanan's Betrayal of Walker of Kansas. 51 PEESIDENT JAMES BUCHANAN'S BETEAYAL OF GOVEKNOK EOBEET J. WALKEE OF KANSAS. BY GEORGE D. HARMON, Assistant Professor History, Lehigh University. During the fifties the territorial government of Kansas and the possibility of that territory being ad- mitted into the Union either as a slave or free state, according to the principle of popular sovereignly, at- tracted wide attention throughout the United States. The excitement grew until the questions concerning Kansas took precedence over all others. The year 1857 marks a decided change in the affairs of Kansas. Active civil war ceased in the fall of 1856— thanks to Governor Geary's persistent and impartial efforts. On January 12, 1857, the pro-slavery party of the territory held a large political convention in which the leaders confessed that they were in a hope- less minority and that it was useless to try to form a slave state in Kansas. Accordingly, many of the active pro-slavery leaders abandoned the struggle. The Missourians, however, had no idea of surrender- ing. AsTKey~were entrenched in the various terri- torial and county offices, they held to their positions and designs; and their efforts began to assume a dif- ferent character. They denounced the Governor in no uncertain terms* in resolutions and devised legisla- tion to further their intrigues. In February, a bill passed the territorial legislature which provided for the calling of a convention to frame a state constitu- tion. Governor Geary sent a message to the legisla- ture stating that the Kansas-Nebraska act left the bona fide inhabitants of the territory "perfectly free to forffl and regulate their own domestic institutions 52 Buchanan9s Betrayal of Walker of Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Layout
    March - April 2002 n Vol. 24, No. 2 KansasKansas PreservationPreservation Newsletter of the Cultural Resources Division n Kansas State Historical Society Bison, or buffalo, appear docile when grazing and ruminating, but the mind behind the massive forehead and curved horns still thinks the way its ancestors thought. Article on page 7. Seeking Amendments to the Kansas Rehabilitation Tax Credit The Cultural Resources Division is tax credit transferable, making projects working with developers, investors, prop- easier to finance by allowing the credits erty owners, and legislators to seek tech- to be sold by entities without a Kansas tax nical amendments to the Kansas Rehabili- liability. In addition, the amendments tation Tax Credit program that was en- would allow partnerships to allocate the acted in 2001. The amendments, pro- tax credit based upon an agreement be- posed in House Bill 2948, are intended to tween partners, rather than by ownership address some technical glitches discov- percentage. ered since the program’s implementation The first hearing was scheduled for Contents last September. Although the proposed March 26. For a copy of the bill, or to amendments should not significantly track its progress, go online to change the application process or pro- www.accesskansas.org. From the main 3 gram requirements for most applicants, screen, click on “Government” (left side), Civil War Memorial they would improve the viability of then “Kansas Legislature” (right side), projects undertaken by partnerships or then “Single Bill Tracking” (under “I Nominated to Natl Register organizations. want to find...” on left side). The amendments would allow the tax For more information about the reha- credit to be applied toward the privilege bilitation tax credit program, please con- 7 tax (banks) and the premiums tax (insur- tact Katrina Klingaman at (785) 272- Bison, The Amazing Story ance companies), in addition to income 8681 Ext.226 or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Chisholm Trail Business Center 453,061 Sq
    :: Industrial Space For Sale/Lease Chisholm Trail Business Center I-135 @ 77th Street North, Wichita, KS 453,061 Sq. Ft. Presented by: InSite Real Estate Group, LLC Real G SiteEstate G Group :: Table of Contents Disclaimer 3 Project Description 4 Building Information 5-6 Photos 7 Building Aerial 7 Site Aerials 8 Neighborhood Aerial 9 Exterior Photos 10 Warehouse Photos 11 Office Photos 12 Plans 13 Office Floor Plan 13 Warehouse Plan 14-15 Site Plan 16-17 Site Boundary Overlay 18-19 Wichita Market Overview 20 Transportation 21 Economic Incentives 22 Maps 23 City Map 24 Area Map 25 P. 2 InSite Real Estate Group Chisholm Trail Business Center :: Information Disclaimer This offering has been prepared solely for informational purposes and does not con- stitute all or any part of an offer or contract. It is designed to assist a potential Buyer in determining whether to proceed with an in-depth investigation of the subject prop- erty. The information is offered subject to errors, omissions, cancellation, modification or withdrawal from the market without notice. The information in this package has been compiled from sources deemed to be reliable. However, neither the information, nor the reliability of the sources, is guaran- teed by InSIte Real Estate Group, LLC, or its agents, affiliates or assigns. While we have no reason to doubt the accuracy of the information profiling the property, it is the responsibility of all prospective Buyers and/or Tenants to independently confirm the accuracy of the same to their satisfaction. Prospective Buyers and/or Tenants should seek professional advice, including legal, tax, real estate, environmental, or other as deemed necessary relative to a purchase or leasing of this property.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Context
    August 2007 REGIONAL CONTEXT Regional Transportation System Defining Regional Context The purpose of this task was to identify and summarize community specific and regional needs within and adjacent to the influence area. The recent update to the Wichita area’s Long Range Transportation Plan was a starting point with its identification of development trends and potential future transportation projects as well as its information on commuting patterns and trends, freight flows and use of all modes of transportation. The needs may include access to recreation/natural areas, development potential, and travel efficiency. System continuity at both a regional and local level was reviewed, including limited opportunities for east-west travel crossing the Wichita Valley Center Floodway commonly referred to as the “Big Ditch”. The system needs will take into account the Kansas Department of Transportation’s (KDOT) existing and proposed roadway system, including the Northwest Bypass, potential transportation improvements to be defined through the on-going South Area Transportation Study as well as any improvements completed or proposed by City or County offices. Access to regionally significant land uses in the immediate vicinity were considered including Towne West Mall, Mid-Continent Airport, Dugan Business area and several aviation manufacturers. The MPO planning area, Sedgwick County, and the Wichita Metropolitan Statistical Area, each of which has a unique boundary, are referenced in the following sections of this report. WAMPO LRTP Goals and Objectives The 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is guided by a set of goals, objectives and strategies that were recommended by the LRTP Advisory Committee and approved by the Wichita Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (WAMPO).
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Program
    Capital Improvement Program The Law Enforcement Training Center EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Capital Improvement Program Overview spending budget for the upcoming budget year and Sedgwick County’s Capital Improvement Program projecting it for years two through five, the planning (CIP) includes the acquisition, construction, years of the program. remodeling, and major maintenance of public facilities and infrastructure systems. To be eligible for the CIP, Sedgwick County Fire District 1 submitted one new a project must be an addition to the County’s facilities project for the 2021-2025 CIP. That project, Fire or infrastructure having an expected useful life greater Station 37 Relocation, is currently on the Watch List. than five years and expected cost exceeding $50,000, or maintenance of existing assets that is estimated to The total capital spending budget for 2021 is cost more than $25,000. Excluding preventive road $25,471,593, a decrease of $2.7 million from the 2020 maintenance (project R175), CIP projects are capital budget. The 2021-2025 program continues to characteristically non-routine and beyond the scope of support the County’s commitment to maintain and normal operations, including normal expected improve its facilities and infrastructure including maintenance. Routine investments in capital assets, roads, bridges, and drainage. including acquisition and maintenance, are planned for in departmental operating budgets, not the CIP. Planned spending on projects in the 2021-2025 CIP Examples of these expenses include replacement of includes the following five-year totals: $82.7 million fleet vehicles and related equipment (excluding fire for roads, $50.0 million for facilities and drainage, and engines and apparatuses) included in the Fleet $27.3 million for bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGERIAL PROGRESSIVE Mary S. Rowland in Most Histories Of
    BEN S. P.I'ULEN: MANAGERIAL PROGRESSIVE v, by 1 Mary S. Rowland ,NO, JR. AND lFAULT In most histories of Kansas, Ben S. Pilulen, the state's 17 governor from 1924 to 1928, is regarded as the epitome of conservatism. In the opinion of those who elected him as well as historians who have written i1bout hi.m, Paulen typified the ) CORPORATE "stand-pat" Republican of the early t\.entieth century. Paulen certainly allied himself with that faction of the party and 30 considered himself to be fiscally cor.s-=rvativ-e, politically cautious, and socially far from progreSSive. An historians' word to be SLue, managerial progresslvism refers to the general movement of managing the social impetus that had been generated by reformers of earlier decades. The later managerial progressives--often governors--accepted the fact of reform but sought to channel that zeal into workable, manageable programs. Using newly-learned management ., principles, these business progressives expanded state sero/i.ces, increased regulator,,· action, and used professional t of washburn University in personnel in government to achieve their goals. Their themes Icipal research interest is were centralization and efficiency.l dissertation topic. was :as, 1916-1930." Recently In Kansas, Governor Arthur Capper (1914-1918) was iI !.! History, 1S an article, leader in promoting businesslike methods in the programs of • state government. His successor, Henry J. Allen, continued to stress management as a gubernatorial functioll. In 1922, this trend was temporar~ly thwarted with the election of the neo­ of History and University populist Democrat, Jonathan M. Davis. Paulen's election two versi ty.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Agreement for the Establishment and Maintenance of Alert/Etac System
    COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF ALERT/ETAC SYSTEM THIS AGREEMENT is made effective the 1st day of March, 2007, among the Participating Agencies defined in Section I authorized by the Governing Body thereof to enter into this Agreement as of the effective date and who are signatories hereto on or before such date. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority of K.S.A. 12-2908; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement recognize that the lack of communication among law enforcement agencies has historically created an enormous impediment to solving criminal cases; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to cooperate in the establishment and maintenance of a data warehouse, called Metro Kansas City Emerging Threat Analysis Capability, which incorporates Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri’s ALERT system (hereinafter referred to as “ALERT/ETAC”) for the purposes of sharing criminal history record information and other criminal justice information, in an effort to establish communication among law enforcement agencies without regard to jurisdictional boundaries to maximize the ability of all Participating Agencies to solve criminal cases. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein, these parties agree as follows: I. PARTIES – PARTICIPATING AGENCIES This Cooperative Agreement is entered into among the entities listed below – collectively referred to as “Participating Agency” or “Participating Agencies” - that have been authorized by their respective
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Urban Ambitions in an Agricultural Economy: Town-building on the Great Plains, 1870 – 1929 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/44n6b932 Author Brown, Erin Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Urban Ambitions in an Agricultural Economy: Town-building on the Great Plains, 1870 – 1929 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Erin Leith Brown 2017 © Copyright by Erin Leith Brown 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Urban Ambitions in an Agricultural Economy: Town-building on the Great Plains, 1870 – 1929 by Erin Leith Brown Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Janice L. Reiff, Chair This dissertation appraises the role of white, middle-class businessmen as engineers of urban development, assessing the complexity of individual and group reactions to an array of economic, political, social, and environmental stimuli that residents of Kansas faced between 1870 and 1929 using Abilene, Wichita, and Dodge City as case studies. I explore the social dynamics that evolved among these local businessmen – as well as with other townspeople and those who lived outside their communities – to consider how these social interactions affected each town’s urban aspirations. This study traces the process of town-building from its inception when Abilene, Wichita, and Dodge City became cattle towns; through the towns’ transition into commercial centers during the boom of the 1880s; their struggles to negotiate the agricultural and economic depression of the 1890s; and their resurgence in the early 1900s.
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmarking Analysis
    Blue Springs 2010 DirectionFinder Survey Section 4: Benchmarking Analysis ETC Institute (Nov 2010) 162 Blue Springs 2010 DirectionFinder Survey Benchmarking DirectionFinder Survey Year 2010 Benchmarking Summary Report Overview ETC Institute's DirectionFinder® program was originally developed in 1999 to help community leaders in Kansas and Missouri use statistically valid community survey data as a tool for making Analysis better decisions. Since November of 1999, the survey has been administered in more than 200 cities in 43 states. This report contains benchmarking data for 30 communities in Kansas and Missouri where the survey was administered during the past two years. The communities represented in this report include: • Blue Springs, Missouri • Lenexa, Kansas • Bonner Springs, Kansas • Liberty, Missouri • Butler, Missouri • Merriam, Kansas • Excelsior Springs, Missouri • Olathe, Kansas • Gardner, Kansas • Platte City, Missouri • Grandview, Missouri • Pleasant Hill, Missouri • Independence, Missouri • Raymore, Missouri • Johnson County, Kansas • Shawnee, Kansas • Kansas City, Missouri • Spring Hill, Kansas • Lawrence, Kansas • Unified Government of Kansas City, • Leawood, Kansas Kansas and Wyandotte County • Lee's Summit, Missouri The charts on the following pages show the range of satisfaction among residents in the communities listed above. The charts show the highest, lowest, and average (mean) levels of satisfaction for a various areas of municipal service delivery. The actual ratings for Blue Springs are listed to the right of
    [Show full text]
  • Distributor Settlement Agreement
    DISTRIBUTOR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Table of Contents Page I. Definitions............................................................................................................................1 II. Participation by States and Condition to Preliminary Agreement .....................................13 III. Injunctive Relief .................................................................................................................13 IV. Settlement Payments ..........................................................................................................13 V. Allocation and Use of Settlement Payments ......................................................................28 VI. Enforcement .......................................................................................................................34 VII. Participation by Subdivisions ............................................................................................40 VIII. Condition to Effectiveness of Agreement and Filing of Consent Judgment .....................42 IX. Additional Restitution ........................................................................................................44 X. Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fees and Costs ................................................................................44 XI. Release ...............................................................................................................................44 XII. Later Litigating Subdivisions .............................................................................................49
    [Show full text]
  • Phiiip Donaici Rowiey 1963111 1H ESIS LIBRARY HIM Michigan State University
    HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS OF KANSAS Thesis F9: #210 fiegme u‘.’ Ed. D. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Phiiip DonaIcI RowIey 1963111 1H ESIS LIBRARY HIM Michigan State University This is to certify that the thesis entitled HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPD'IENT IN THE ELEDENTARY SCHOOLS OF KANSAS presented by PHILIP DON ALD ROWLEY has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ed. D. degree in Education _Q Date November 9, 1961+ 0-169 ABSTRACT HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS OF KANSAS by Philip Donald Rowley This study explores the historical development of the elementary school curricula of Kansas from the period of the territorial legislatures beginning in 1855, to the early decades of the twentieth century. The reasons for settlement in Kansas are explored, and related to the establishment of the schools. A discus- sion of the various ethnic and religious groups who migrated to Kansas is included, along with a survey of their special educational needs. Emphasis is given to the formation of the district school in Kansas, showing it as a feature which met the needs of the settlers well, although it was not uniquely a Kansas product. The textbook commissions, legalized by the early state legislatures, are given heavy emphasis for two reasons: first, to show a situation which did not exist in many states — that of state printed and published textbooks, and pre- scribed textbook usage for all schools; second, to show the relationship which existed between these prescribed text- books and the establishment of curricula and courses of study within the state.
    [Show full text]