Cranfield University A.G. Varelis Technoeconomic Study of Engine Deterioration and Compressor Washing for Military Gas Turbine E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cranfield University A.G. Varelis Technoeconomic Study of Engine Deterioration and Compressor Washing for Military Gas Turbine E CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY A.G. VARELIS TECHNOECONOMIC STUDY OF ENGINE DETERIORATION AND COMPRESSOR WASHING FOR MILITARY GAS TURBINE ENGINES SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Master of Science by Research THESIS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF POWER AND PROPULSION MSc by Research Thesis Academic Year 2007-2008 Angelos G. Varelis Technoeconomic Study of Engine Deterioration and Compressor Washing for Military Gas Turbine Engines Supervisor: Prof. P. Pilidis September 2008 © Cranfield University 2008. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. ABSTRACT Despite spending much of their operating life in clear air, aircraft gas turbine engines are naturally prone to deterioration as they are generally not fitted with air filters. Engines are particularly at risk during takeoff and landing, and whilst operating in areas of pollution, sand, dust storms, etc. The build-up of contaminants, especially on the compressor surfaces, leads to a dramatic reduction in compressor efficiency, which gives rise to a loss of available power, increased fuel consumption and increased exhaust gas temperature. These conditions can lead to flight delays, inspection failures, withdrawal from service, increased operating costs and safety compromises.With the growing interest in life cycle costs for gas turbine engines, both engine manufacturers and operators are investigating the tradeoffs between performance improvements and associated maintenance costs. This report introduces the problem of output and efficiency degradation in two aero gas turbine engines (the T56–A–15 and the F110–GE–129) caused by various deterioration factors. Their causes are broadly discussed and the effects on powerplant performance are simulated and analyzed. One of the key factors leading to performance losses during operation of these engines is compressor fouling. The fouling can come from a wide variety of sources; hydrocarbons from fuel and lubricating oils; volcanic ash; pollen; marine aerosols; dust; smoke; pollution, etc. The presence of these fouling sources acts as a bonding agent for the solid contaminants, ‘gluing’ them to the compressor surfaces. Thus, the aggravation in terms of power output, fuel consumption and additional time to carry out a typical mission will be assessed and an economic analysis will be attempted in order to quantify the effects of compressor fouling on the additional costs which arise, because of this specific deterioration. The effect of compressor fouling can be maintained by frequent cleaning to improve efficiency, resulting, hence, in improved power output, fuel savings and prolonged engine life. Compressor cleaning is thoroughly presented, and the implementation of on-wing off-line cleaning on the performance of the F110 engine was investigated from a technical and economical standpoint. Finally, according to the results obtained, the optimal frequency of compressor washing for the F110 engine is estimated, in order to eliminate safety compromises, improve performance and reduce the engine’s life cycle cost. AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Professor Pericles Pilidis, for his help, guidance and understanding, necessary to drive me along the project throughout this year, and the Department of Power Engineering and Propulsion of Cranfield University, for providing me with all the necessary tools and support to complete this Master. In addition, I would like to thank Mr. Paul Lambart, Projects Director of R-MC Power Recovery Ltd, with whom I had the opportunity to have a fruitful conversation, which helped me acquire a broader view of the technoeconomic aspects of compressor cleaning. I would also like to extend my sincere thanks to all the friends from Cranfield University and especially to Elias Tsoutsanis, who, despite his PhD studies, was always available for discussion and willing to support me in many aspects of my University life, including, of course, the broader understanding of anything related to the operation of a gas turbine engine. Moreover, I would like to express my appreciation to the Hellenic Air Force for providing me with the opportunity to study in Cranfield University, in a Department that was and still remains of my greatest interest, and to my colleagues from the 111 Combat Wing Engine Maintenance Department for all the things we shared in our everyday work in the last 10 years. My passion for gas turbine engines comes from working with such capable, professional and enthusiastic people. Finally, and most important, I would like to dedicate this work to my wife Anna and my sons Yioryo and Anastasio for their patience, unceasing support and sacrifices during my studies in Cranfield University. "True wisdom comes to each of us when we realize how little we understand about life, ourselves, and the world around us." Socrates LIST OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………............ i LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………............... iv NOTATION……...……………………………………………………………........... vi ACRONYMS…………………………………………………………………............ x 1.0. INTRODUCTION……….....…………………………………….............. 1 1.1. Background........………………………………………………………… 1 1.2. Aim of the Thesis......................…………………………………........... 3 1.3. Thesis Scope................................................................………........... 4 1.5. Thesis Layout…………………………………………………………….. 4 2.0. LITERATURE REVIEW......................…………………...................... 6 2.1. Performance Degradation....……………………………………............ 6 2.1.1. Degradation Rate...………………………………………………........... 6 2.1.2. Causes of Degradation………………………………………………….. 7 2.1.2.1 Fouling…………………………………………………………………….. 10 2.1.2.2 Erosion………………………………………………………………......... 14 2.1.2.3 Corrosion……………………………………………………………......... 16 2.1.2.4 Thermal Distortion……………………………………………………….. 18 2.1.2.5 Foreign Object Damage and Domestic Object Damage…………….. 19 2.1.2.6 Rubbing Wear.................................................................................... 20 2.1.2.7 Engine Operating Conditions and Maintenance Practices................. 20 2.2. Compressor Cleaning......................................................................... 21 2.2.1. Manual Cleaning................................................................................ 23 2.2.2. Abrasive Cleaning.............................................................................. 24 2.2.3. Wet Cleaning...................................................................................... 24 2.2.3.1 Offline Washing.................................................................................. 24 2.2.3.2 Online Washing.................................................................................. 27 2.3. On-wing Off-line Cleaning of Aero Engines………….……………….. 33 2.3.1. Risks and Benefits of On-wing Off-line Cleaning…………………….. 39 2.4. Performance Simulation Software...................................................... 40 3.0. GENERAL ENGINE DESCRIPTION AND MODELING.................... 42 3.1. The T56-A-15 Engine..........................……………..……………......... 42 3.2. The F110-GE-129 Engine...................……………..……………......... 45 4.0. ANALYSIS OF ENGINE’S DETERIORATION....................………… 47 4.1. Simulation of the Engine’s Deterioration............................................ 47 4.2. Simulated Faults Representation....……………………………………. 48 4.3. The T56-A-15 engine……………………………….............................. 52 4.3.1. Compressor Fouling.....................................……………………......... 52 4.3.2. Turbine Fouling............................................……………………......... 54 4.3.3. Turbine Erosion...........................................…………………………... 56 4.4. The F110-GE-129 Engine...................……………..……………......... 58 4.4.1. Compressor Fouling.....................................……………………......... 58 4.4.2. Turbine Fouling............................................…………………….......... 64 4.4.3. Turbine Erosion...........................................…………………………... 66 5.0. OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS…………………….. 70 5.1. Mission Profiles………………………………………………………….. 70 5.2. Mission Analysis……………………………………………………........ 71 5.3 Mission A……………………………………………………………......... 72 5.4 Mission B…………...……………………………………………….......... 74 5.5. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation…………………………………. 76 5.6. Discussion of the Results……………………………………………….. 78 6.0. TECHNOECONOMIC STUDY OF COMPRESSOR WASHING……. 82 6.1. Effects of Compressor Washing on Fuel Savings...………………….. 82 6.2. Effects of Compressor Deterioration on Creep Life……………….…. 84 6.3. Compressor Washing Frequency Optimization ……………………… 86 7.0. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK.. 88 7.1. Conclusions........................……………………………………………. 88 7.2. Recommendations for Future Work…...................………………....... 94 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………............ 95 APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………….. 102 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Compressor characteristics – Engine degradation……… 9 Figure 2.2 Fouling caused by severe carbonaceous oily type of deposits, because of oil leaks in the bearing system……. 10 Figure 2.3 Industrial gas turbine compressor fouling…………………. 12 Figure 2.4 Gas turbine fouling…………………………………………... 14 Figure 2.5 Compressor blade erosion………………………………….. 15 Figure 2.6 Compressor blade corrosion……………………………….. 17 Figure 2.7 FOD of Industrial Gas Turbine Blades..…………………… 19 Figure 2.8 Compressor blades before and after cleaning…………… 22 Figure 2.9 Cleaning fluid spraying
Recommended publications
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Incorporates Many Significant Technological Enhancements Derived from Predecessor Development Programs
    AIAA AVIATION Forum 10.2514/6.2018-3368 June 25-29, 2018, Atlanta, Georgia 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference F-35 Air Vehicle Technology Overview Chris Wiegand,1 Bruce A. Bullick,2 Jeffrey A. Catt,3 Jeffrey W. Hamstra,4 Greg P. Walker,5 and Steve Wurth6 Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, United States of America The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II incorporates many significant technological enhancements derived from predecessor development programs. The X-35 concept demonstrator program incorporated some that were deemed critical to establish the technical credibility and readiness to enter the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) program. Key among them were the elements of the F-35B short takeoff and vertical landing propulsion system using the revolutionary shaft-driven LiftFan® system. However, due to X- 35 schedule constraints and technical risks, the incorporation of some technologies was deferred to the SDD program. This paper provides insight into several of the key air vehicle and propulsion systems technologies selected for incorporation into the F-35. It describes the transition from several highly successful technology development projects to their incorporation into the production aircraft. I. Introduction HE F-35 Lightning II is a true 5th Generation trivariant, multiservice air system. It provides outstanding fighter T class aerodynamic performance, supersonic speed, all-aspect stealth with weapons, and highly integrated and networked avionics. The F-35 aircraft
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2011. ■ 2012 USAF Almanac Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying intercontinental missions and penetrating enemy defenses with the largest payload of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 66. Aircraft Location: Dyess AFB, Tex.; Edwards AFB, Calif.; Eglin AFB, Fla.; Ellsworth AFB, S.D. Contractor: Boeing, AIL Systems, General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbofans, each 30,780 lb thrust. Accommodation: pilot, copilot, and two WSOs (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. Dimensions: span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 ft, height 34 ft. B-1B Lancer (SSgt. Brian Ferguson) Weight: max T-O 477,000 lb. Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft. carriage, improved onboard computers, improved B-2 Spirit Performance: speed 900+ mph at S-L, range communications. Sniper targeting pod added in Brief: Stealthy, long-range multirole bomber that intercontinental. mid-2008. Receiving Fully Integrated Data Link can deliver nuclear and conventional munitions Armament: three internal weapons bays capable of (FIDL) upgrade to include Link 16 and Joint Range anywhere on the globe. accommodating a wide range of weapons incl up to Extension data link, enabling permanent LOS and Function: Long-range heavy bomber.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This File Now!
    INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 4 1. AERODYNAMIC SECTION........................................................................................... 8 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 The Pitch limiters ................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 The Lift and Drag ( Cl / Cd )............................................................................................................................... 12 1.3 The Rudder ( CY )................................................................................................................................................ 19 1.4 The Drag Index (DI)............................................................................................................................................. 20 2 ENGINES SECTION................................................................................................ 22 2.1 The Pratt & Whitney engines ............................................................................................................................. 22 2.2 The General Electric Engines ............................................................................................................................. 28 3 A BIT OF HISTORY.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Issue No. 4, Oct-Dec
    VOL. 6, NO. 4, OCTOBER - DECEMBER 1979 t l"i ~ ; •• , - --;j..,,,,,,1:: ~ '<• I '5t--A SERVt(;E P\JBLICATtON Of: t.OCKH EE:O-G EORGlA COt.'PAfllV A 01Vt$10,.. or t.OCKHEEOCOAf'ORATION A SERVICE PUBLICATION OF LOCKHEED-GEORGIA COMPANY The C-130 and Special Projects Engineering A DIVISION OF Division is pleased to welcome you to a LOCKHEED CORPORATION special “Meet the Hercules” edition of Service News magazine. This issue is de- Editor voted entirely to a description of the sys- Don H. Hungate tems and features of the current production models of the Hercules aircraft, the Ad- Associate Editors Charles 1. Gale vanced C-130H, and the L-100-30. Our James A. Loftin primary purpose is to better acquaint you with these two most recently updated Arch McCleskey members of Lockheed’s distinguished family Patricia A. Thomas of Hercules airlifters, but first we’d like to say a few words about the engineering or- Art Direction & Production ganization that stands behind them. Anne G. Anderson We in the Project Design organization have the responsibility for the configuration and Vol. 6, No. 4, October-December 1979 systems operation of all new or modified CONTENTS C-130 or L-100 aircraft. During the past 26 years, we have been intimately involved with all facets of Hercules design and maintenance. Our goal 2 Focal Point is to keep the Lockheed Hercules the most efficient and versatile cargo aircraft in the world. We 0. C. Brockington, C-130 encourage our customers to communicate their field experiences and recommendations to us so that Engineering Program Manager we can pass along information which will be useful to all operators, and act on those items that would benefit from engineeringattention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines
    The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines Product Code #F640 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Aviation Gas Turbine Forecast Analysis 1 The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines 2010-2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................2 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Market Focus .............................................................................................................................................................3 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................4 Figure 1 - The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines Unit Production 2010 - 2019 (Bar Graph) .................................................................................6 Figure 2 - The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines Value of Production 2010 - 2019 (Bar Graph)...........................................................................6 Manufacturers Review.............................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2015. By Aaron M. U. Church, Senior Editor ■ 2016 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT B-1 Lancer Brief: Long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and de- livering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. COMMENTARY The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four proto- types were developed and tested before program cancellation in 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998. Its three internal weapons bays accommodate a substantial payload of weapons, including a mix of different weapons in each bay. Lancer production totaled 100 aircraft. The bomber’s blended wing/ body configuration, variable-geometry design, and turbofan engines provide long range and loiter time. The B-1B has been upgraded with GPS, smart weapons, and mission systems. Offensive avionics include SAR for tracking, B-2A Spirit (SSgt. Jeremy M. Wilson) targeting, and engaging moving vehicles and terrain following. GPS-aided INS lets aircrews autonomously navigate without ground-based navigation aids Dimensions: Span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 and precisely engage targets. Sniper pod was added in 2008. The ongoing ft, height 34 ft. integrated battle station modifications is the most comprehensive refresh in Weight: Max T-O 477,000 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of Weapons
    Gallery of Weapons By Aaron M. U. Church 2017 USAF Almanac B-1 Lancer TSgt. Richard Ebensberger/USAF BOMBER AIRCRAFT 2016. FY17 funds support development of higher ■■ B-2 SPIRIT powered Military Code (M-Code) jam-resistant Brief: Stealthy, long-range nuclear and con- ■■ B-1 LANCER GPS interface. B-1s resumed Pacific presence ventional strike bomber. Brief: Long-range penetrating bomber capable rotations to Guam in 2016. of delivering the largest weapon load of any COMMENTARY aircraft in the Air Force inventory. EXTANT VARIANT(S) The B-2 is a flying wing that combines LO • B-1B. Upgraded production version of the stealth design with high aerodynamic efficiency. COMMENTARY canceled B-1A. Spirit entered combat against Serb targets The B-1A was initially proposed as a replace- Function: Long-range conventional bomber. during Allied Force on March 24, 1999. B-2 ment for the B-52, and four prototypes were Operator: AFGSC, AFMC. production was completed in three successive developed and tested before program cancella- First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, blocks and all aircraft were upgraded to Block tion in 1977. The program was revived in 1981 1984 (B-1B). 30 standards with AESA radar. AESA paves the as the B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft added Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. way for future advanced weapons integration 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Texas (B-1B). including Long-Range Standoff (LRSO) mis- reduced radar cross section, but cut speed to Production: 104. sile and B61-12 bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • AC-130 GUNSHIP and ITS VARIANTS Research from 10/2010 AC-130
    THE AC-130 GUNSHIP AND ITS VARIANTS Research from 10/2010 AC-130 The AC-130 gun ship’s primary missions are close air support, air interdiction and armed reconnaissance. Other missions include perimeter and point defense, escort, landing, drop and extraction zone support, forward air control, limited command and control, and combat search and rescue. These heavily armed aircraft incorporate side-firing weapons integrated with sophisticated sensor, navigation and fire control systems to provide surgical firepower or area saturation during extended periods, at night and in adverse weather. The AC-130 has been used effectively for over thirty years to take out ground defenses and targets. One drawback to using the AC-130 is that it is typically only used in night assaults because of its poor maneuverability and limited orientations relative to the target during attack. During Vietnam, gun ships destroyed more than 10,000 trucks and were credited with many life-saving close air support missions. AC-130s suppressed enemy air defense systems and attacked ground forces during Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada. This enabled the successful assault of Point Saline’s airfield via airdrop and air land of friendly forces. The gunships had a primary role during Operation Just Cause in Panama by destroying Panamanian Defense Force Headquarters and numerous command and control facilities by surgical employment of ordnance in an urban environment. As the only close air support platform in the theater, Spectres were credited with saving the lives of many friendly personnel. Both the H-models and A-models played key roles. The fighting was opened by a gunship attack on the military headquarters of the dictator of Panama and the outcome was never in doubt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parametric Analysis of a Turbofan Engine with an Auxiliary Bypass Combustion Chamber – the Turboaux Engine
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Theses & Dissertations Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Fall 12-2020 A Parametric Analysis of a Turbofan Engine with an Auxiliary Bypass Combustion Chamber – The TurboAux Engine Kaleab Fetahi Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/mae_etds Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons, Thermodynamics Commons, and the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Fetahi, Kaleab. "A Parametric Analysis of a Turbofan Engine with an Auxiliary Bypass Combustion Chamber – The TurboAux Engine" (2020). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/55dp-vd74 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/mae_etds/330 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A TURBOFAN ENGINE WITH AN AUXILIARY BYPASS COMBUSTION CHAMBER – THE TURBOAUX ENGINE by Kaleab Fetahi B.S. May 2019, Old Dominion University M.S. December 2020, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 2020 Approved by: Sharan Asundi (Director) Arthur C. Taylor (Co-Director) Adem Ibrahim (Member) ii ABSTRACT A PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A TURBOFAN ENGINE WITH AN AUXILIARY BYPASS COMBUSTION CHAMBER – THE TURBOAUX ENGINE Kaleab Fetahi Old Dominion University, 2020 Director: Dr. Sharan Asundi A parametric study of a novel turbofan engine with an auxiliary combustion chamber, nicknamed the TurboAux engine is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Combat Aircraft (1945 – 2010)
    I MODERN COMBAT AIRCRAFT (1945 – 2010) Modern Combat Aircraft (1945-2010) is a brief overview of the most famous military aircraft developed by the end of World War II until now. Fixed-wing airplanes and helicopters are presented by the role fulfilled, by the nation of origin (manufacturer), and year of first flight. For each aircraft is available a photo, a brief introduction, and information about its development, design and operational life. The work is made using English Wikipedia, but also other Web sites. FIGHTER-MULTIROLE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Lockheed General Dynamics 001 1944 3 011 1964 27 P-80 Shooting Star F-111 Aardvark Republic Grumman 002 1946 5 012 1970 29 F-84 Thunderjet F-14 Tomcat North American Northrop 003 1947 7 013 1972 33 F-86 Sabre F-5E/F Tiger II North American McDonnell Douglas 004 1953 9 014 1972 35 F-100 Super Sabre F-15 Eagle Convair General Dynamics 005 1953 11 015 1974 39 F-102 Delta Dagger F-16 Fighting Falcon Lockheed McDonnell Douglas 006 1954 13 016 1978 43 F-104 Starfighter F/A-18 Hornet Republic Boeing 007 1955 17 017 1995 45 F-105 Thunderchief F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Vought Lockheed Martin 008 1955 19 018 1997 47 F-8 Crusader F-22 Raptor Convair Lockheed Martin 009 1956 21 019 2006 51 F-106 Delta Dart F-35 Lightning II McDonnell Douglas 010 1958 23 F-4 Phantom II SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Study of the Chemical Behavior of Jet Emissions in Photochemical Smog.[Computerized Simulation]
    N O T I C E THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE ^_tsa (NASA-CR-152345) INTRUll[1C'IuRY STUDY OF THL Nd0-[1d y 1 ^ CHE"IICAL LF.tiaV1U[1 OF JE'i EtI551UNS IN (^ PHUTOc:HE^y 1CAL SMOG :• i^al [ieEort (Systems Applications, lnc.) i 15 I^ NC A^)6/MF AJ L'nclas '' ='! ^^^^ R {. ^^ 1 .. ^ N ^ ^^^1 PREPARED BY SY^ITEMB APPLICATIONS. INC. t^ NT f-, . - ^^! - t 5 ^.3S^ Final Report fc INTRODUCTORY STUDY OF THE CHEMICAL BENAVIOR OF JE7 EMISSIONS IN PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG Contract No. NAS2-882.1 EF76-04R May 1976 by Gary Z. Whitten Henry Hogo Systems Applications, Incorporated 950 Northgate Drive San Rafael, California 94903 C Prepared for - Ames Research Center = National Aeronautics and Space Administration Moffett Field, California 94035 ' and Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D. C. _ C^ _ T=^ -- ^.^ - -^— i ii CONTENTS L `^ f OF ILLUSTRATIONS vi LIST OF TABLES ix I INTRODUCTION . 1 II EXHAUST EMISSIONS IN THE VICINITY OF AN AIRPORT 3 A. The LTO Cycle . 3 6. Kydrocarbon Composition of Aircraft Emissions 6 C. Aircraft Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides . 11 D. Hydrocarbon/NOx Ratios from Aircraft Emissions and Automobile Emissions 18 1. I'^^drocarbonjNOx Ratios from Aircraft Emissions 18 2. Hydrocarbon/NOx Ratios from Automobile Exhaust Emissions 25 III COMPUTER SIMULATIONS OF PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG 27 A. The Generalized Kinetic Mechanism . 27 B. Results of the Computer Simulations 32 G. Computer Simulations with Automobile Emissions 49 IV SENSITIVITY RUNS AND EVALUATION OF THE KINETIC MECHANISM 53 ` A.
    [Show full text]