DOCSLIB.ORG

Central-Western Sardinia, Italy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central-Western Sardinia, Italy STAR: SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2017.1417781 Geo-material provenance and technological properties investigation in Copper Age menhirs production at Allai (central-western Sardinia, Italy) Marco Serra a,b,c, Valentina Mameli c,d and Carla Cannas c,d aLASP – Laboratorio di Antichità Sarde e Paletnologia, Dipartimento di Storia, Beni Culturali e Territorio, Università di Cagliari, Piazza Arsenale 1, 09100 Cagliari, Italy; bAUSI – Consorzio per la Promozione delle Attività Universitarie del Sulcis-Iglesiente; C.R.E.A.TE.– Centro di Ricerca per l’Energia, l’Ambiente e il Territorio, Palazzo Bellavista-Monteponi, 09016 Iglesias, Italy; cINSTM, Cagliari Unit; dDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria, 09042 Monserrato, Italy ABSTRACT KEYWORDS During the 2nd millennium BC anthropomorphic menhirs belonging to a 3rd millennium BC Sardinia; Copper Age; sanctuary were reused as building material in the Arasseda Nuraghe (Sardinia, Italy). To menhir; provenance study; analyse the Arasseda menhirs and the local Monte Ironi geological samples (presenting technological properties similar visual features), chemical (pXRF, ICP-OES, ICP-MS), mineralogical-chemical (PXRD) and physical (Mohs hardness) measurements were performed. Through the experimental data, the menhirs source provenance and the technological properties (workability, durability) of the raw material chosen for sculptural purposes during Copper Age were investigated. To the authors’ knowledge this is the first archaeometric study on the Arasseda menhirs (the third on Sardinian menhirs) and one between the few recently developed on European megaliths. nd Introduction Bronze Age (2 millennium BC). These artefacts show an ogival frontal profile, a plano-convex section Megalithism appeared in Europe during the 6th millen- and are characterised by geometric representations nium BC, soon erecting a number of archaeological (generally interpreted as human anatomical parts) evidence related to cults of death and ancestors. made by the bas-relief technique (Atzeni 1992; Cossu Among the megalithic monuments it is worth men- 1996; Cicilloni 2008)(Figure 2). tioning menhirs, that are present in many geographical An ancient quarry of ignimbrite blocks (Figure 3A) contexts between Spain and Ural mountains. The pro- was discovered near the nuraghe and the sculptures’ cess of standing stones’ spread across the Central-Wes- find area (Cossu 1996). The recent finding of Monte tern part of Europe and their artistic and symbolic Claro culture polished pottery (cfr. Basoli, Doro, and evolution between 6th and 3rd millennia BC, is still Zedda 2012) during a survey performed in the quarry not clear. However, today a good part of the archaeol- site (Figure 3B), suggested the probable use of the ogists endorses the polygenic origin of the phenom- stone blocks in Eneolithic times (2900–2300 cal BC enon (Guilaine 1980; 2004), rejecting the traditional according to Melis 2009), perhaps for the production diffusionist and migrationist theses (Arnal, Arnal, of the Arasseda menhirs. and Demurtas 1983). So far, few studies investigated the source prove- As in other regions of Europe (Taçon 1999; Calado nance and the technological properties of European 2002) Sardinian menhirs were probably realised for the megaliths (Bevins, and Ixer 2013; Bevins, Ixer, and cult of death (Perra 1992; Cossu 1996) or used as terri- Pearce 2014; Thorpe et al. 1991; Pirson, Toussaint, torial markers (Atzeni 1982; Saba 2000; Usai and Perra and Frèbutte 2002, 2003; Williams-Thorpe et al. 2012). Today, over 100 anthropomorphic menhirs 2006) and a small part of them concerns menhirs. (made of a wide variety of sedimentary, metamorphic Only two of the available research works addressed Ita- and volcanic stones) are known in Sardinia, specifically lian standing stones characterised by anthropomorphic for the areas called Nurra, Marghine, Mandrolisai, Bar- features (Di Battistini, Franzini, and Lezzerini 2008; bagia di Belvì, Barigadu, Marmilla, Sarcidano and Sul- Rubinetto et al. 2014) similar to those of Eneolithic Sar- cis (Cicilloni 2008, 2013)(Figure 1). dinia, probably produced from the first centuries of 3rd In the 1990s some Eneolithic menhirs were found in millennium BC (Melis 2009; Cocchi Genick 2012; Arasseda, near the small town of Allai (Barigadu zone, Perra 2012). central-western Sardinia) (Figure 1). They were reused During the last decades, some assumptions on stone to build the Arasseda Nuraghe during the Sardinian working technology and provenance of geo-resources CONTACT Marco Serra [email protected] © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2 M. SERRA ET AL. Figure 1. The island of Sardinia in the Central European geographic framework (A); generalised map of Sardinia showing the men- hir find localities (B); territory of Allai showing the Arasseda hill with nuraghe, menhirs and quarry site locations (C). employed in Neolithic and Eneolithic Sardinian mega- failure to sistematically adopt a synergy between the lithism were formulated (Atzeni 1982; Maoddi 1995; traditional archaeological investigation and archeome- Castaldi, 2000; Marini et al. 2007; Murru et al. 2008). try. The application of this joint approach to the study However, the research on this item, especially with of prehistoric Sardinian standing stones is currently reference to menhirs, has always been rare due to the restricted to two cases, performed on the menhirs of Figure 2. Menhirs from Allai: Arasseda II (1), Arasseda III (2) and Arasseda VII (3). STAR: SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH 3 Figure 3. A) Arasseda quarry site: layout plan and cross sections; B) Eneolithic (Monte Claro culture) ceramic shards from the Ara- sseda quarry site. Sarcidano (Figure 1), specifically of Nurallao (Serra, menhirs recently removed from Arasseda Nuraghe Mameli, and Cannas 2016a) and Laconi (Serra, and displayed in the Sardinian archaeological museum Mameli, and Cannas 2016b). of Laconi. In continuity with the European tradition of In the frame of the few archaeometric examinations archaeometric studies on megaliths, the selected of the Eneolithic Sardinian standing stones, the authors approach (visual inspection and chemical analysis) present the results of a study concerning the three aims to detect the source provenance of the raw 4 M. SERRA ET AL. materials employed for the production of the Arasseda 2000; Piccioli 1998; Potts et al. 2006; Ruge, Barber, and menhirs. In addition, through the definition of miner- Magee 2007), including samples from the unmodified alogy and hardness of the stone, the research investi- bedrock (MIA_C1-6) and from the quarry site of Ara- gates the workability and durability of the geo- sseda (MIA_C7-8) (Figure 5). The topographic pos- resource employed in the Arasseda menhirs’ ition of each sample was recorded by means of a GPS manufacture. system (Fornaseri, Malpieri, and Tolomeo 1975) and shown in the map of Figure 4. The archaeometric study was performed on the Materials and methods three Arasseda Eneolithic menhirs hosted in the “ ” Geological setting Museo della Statuaria Preistorica in Sardegna of Laconi (Figure 2). The discoverers labelled these men- In the Barigadu region, on the paleozoic metamorphic hirs as Arasseda II, III and VII respectively (Atzeni basement, the appearance of rhyolitic lava domes and 1992; Cossu 1996). flows took place during the Cenozoic Era (Figure 4). In the northern part of Allai the small ignimbritic out- crop of Monte Ironi (produced by a dacitic glowing cloud developed during the Oligo-Miocene period) Analyses on the geological samples closed the volcanic stratigraphy (Figure 5A). This pyr- The visual inspection of the geological samples was oclastic outcrop, composed of idiochromatic rocks performed by naked eye and 2.5X magnifying lens always reddish-brown in colour because of the oxi- (Hermes and Ritchie 1997b; Ricq de Bouard 2002; Gar- dation of iron in the contained iron-minerals (Assorgia rison 2003) and allowed to describe their macroscopic et al. 1995, 1998), forms the Arasseda hill, today sur- features. rounded by a wide quaternary alluvial soil deposit All the eight intact samples were first analysed with (Figure 4). a portable X-Ray Fluorescence spectrophotometer (pXRF) to determine (qualitatively and semi-quantitat- ively) their elemental composition. The pXRF analyses Sampling were carried out through an ASSING LITHOS 3000 The strong layering of paleozoic shales and cenozoic spectrophotometer. The experimental conditions rhyolites, rules out their use to make megaliths as men- were defined as follows: acquisition time = 600 s; vol- hirs. Conversely, the Monte Ironi ignimbrites show a tage = 25 kV; electric current = 150 μÅ; collimator structure without close cleavage planes (Argiolas diameter of the incident X-rays beam = 5 mm; distance et al. 2006) that certainly could allow the production between the source and the sample = 10 mm. On each of megalithic sculptural works. In addition, among sample, the analysis was performed on three different the geo-resources present in Allai, the Monte Ironi vol- areas of the fresh rock core, detectable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Concrete Prehistories: the Making of Megalithic Modernism 1901-1939
    Concrete Prehistories: The Making of Megalithic Modernism Abstract After water, concrete is the most consumed substance on earth. Every year enough cement is produced to manufacture around six billion cubic metres of concrete1. This paper investigates how concrete has been built into the construction of modern prehistories. We present an archaeology of concrete in the prehistoric landscapes of Stonehenge and Avebury, where concrete is a major component of megalithic sites restored between 1901 and 1964. We explore how concreting changed between 1901 and the Second World War, and the implications of this for constructions of prehistory. We discuss the role of concrete in debates surrounding restoration, analyze the semiotics of concrete equivalents for the megaliths, and investigate the significance of concreting to interpretations of prehistoric building. A technology that mixes ancient and modern, concrete helped build the modern archaeological imagination. Concrete is the substance of the modern –”Talking about concrete means talking about modernity” (Forty 2012:14). It is the material most closely associated with the origins and development of modern architecture, but in the modern era, concrete has also been widely deployed in the preservation and display of heritage. In fact its ubiquity means that concrete can justifiably claim to be the single most dominant substance of heritage conservation practice between 1900 and 1945. This paper investigates how concrete has been built into the construction of modern pasts, and in particular, modern prehistories. As the pre-eminent marker of modernity, concrete was used to separate ancient from modern, but efforts to preserve and display prehistoric megaliths saw concrete and megaliths become entangled.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lives of Prehistoric Monuments in Iron Age, Roman, and Medieval Europe by Marta Díaz-Guardamino, Leonardo García Sanjuán and David Wheatley (Eds)
    The Prehistoric Society Book Reviews THE LIVES OF PREHISTORIC MONUMENTS IN IRON AGE, ROMAN, AND MEDIEVAL EUROPE BY MARTA DÍAZ-GUARDAMINO, LEONARDO GARCÍA SANJUÁN AND DAVID WHEATLEY (EDS) Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015. 356pp, 50 figs, 32 B/W plates, 6 tables. ISBN 978-0-19-872460-5, hb, £85 This handsome book is the outcome of a session at the 2013 European Association of Archaeologists in Pilsen, organised by the editors on the cultural biographies of monuments. It is divided into three sections, with the main part comprising 13 detailed case-studies, framed on either side by shorter introduction and discussion pieces. There is variety in the chronologies, subject matters and geographical scopes addressed; in short there is something for almost everyone! In their Introduction, the editors advocate that archaeologists require a more reflexive conceptual toolkit to deal with the complex issues of monument continuity, transformation, re-use and abandonment, and the significance of the speed and the timing of changes. They also critique the loaded term ‘afterlife’ as this separates the unfolding biography of a monument, and unwittingly relegates later activities to lesser importance than its original function. In the following chapter, Joyce Salisbury explores how the veneration of natural places in the landscape, such as caves and mountains, was shifted to man-made monumental features over time. The bulk of the book focuses on the specific case-studies which span Denmark in the north to Tunisia in the south and from Ireland in the west to Serbia and Crete in the east. In Chapter 3, Steen Hvass’s account of the history of research at the monument complex of King’s Jelling in Denmark is fascinating, but a little heavy on stratigraphic narrative, and light on theory and discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Avebury WHS Management Plan 2015 Summary
    Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site Vision The Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site is universally important for its unique and dense concentration of outstanding prehistoric monuments and sites which together form a landscape without parallel. We will work together to care for and safeguard this special area and provide a tranquil, rural and ecologically diverse setting for it and its archaeology. This will allow present and future generations to explore and enjoy the monuments and their landscape setting more fully. We will also ensure that the special qualities of the World Heritage Site are presented, interpreted and enhanced where appropriate, so that visitors, the local community and the whole world can better understand and value the extraordinary achievements © K020791 Historic England © K020791 Historic of the prehistoric people who left us this rich legacy. Avebury Stone Circle We will realise the cultural, scientific and educational potential of the World Heritage Site as well as its social and economic benefits for the community. © N060499 Historic England © N060499 Historic Stonehenge in summer 2 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 World Heritage Sites © K930754 Historic England © K930754 Historic Arable farming in the WHS below the Ridgeway, Avebury The Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site is internationally important for its complexes of outstanding prehistoric monuments. Stonehenge is the most architecturally sophisticated prehistoric stone circle in the world, while Avebury is Stonehenge and Avebury were inscribed as a single World Heritage Site in 1986 for their outstanding prehistoric monuments the largest.
    [Show full text]
  • Étude Sur Quelques Éléments Figuratifs Des Statues-Menhirs Et Stèles Européennes Du Néolithique À L'age Du Bronze
    Étude sur quelques éléments figuratifs des statues-menhirs et stèles européennes du Néolithique à l'Age du Bronze Lhonneux Tatiana Master en histoire de l'art et archéologie Orientation générale – Option générale – Finalité approfondie Directeur : Pierre Noiret Lecteurs : Marcel Otte – Nicolas Cauwe Volume I Université de Liège – Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres Année académique 2018-2019 Remerciements Ce mémoire est l’aboutissement d’un long parcours que je n’aurais pas pu réaliser seule. Aussi je tiens à remercier chaleureusement toutes les personnes qui, de près ou de loin, ont contribué à l’accomplissement de ce cheminement. Au terme de ce travail, je tiens à exprimer ma profonde gratitude à Monsieur Noiret qui, en tant que Directeur de mémoire, s’est toujours montré à l’écoute et disponible. Je le remercie pour l’aide et le temps qu’il a bien voulu me consacrer et sans qui ce mémoire n’aurait jamais vu le jour. Je voudrais saisir cette occasion pour témoigner toute ma reconnaissance à Monsieur Otte, pour ses précieux conseils dans mes recherches et questionnements. Je le remercie également pour le prêt de l'ouvrage sur les stèles provençales ; ouvrage faisant partie de sa collection personnelle. Dans cette même lancée, je remercie également Monsieur Cauwe d'avoir su me rediriger sur la bonne voie dans l'élaboration de mon travail et d'avoir su me remotiver pour le finaliser. Je tiens à exprimer ma gratitude aux quelques musées, qui m'ont aimablement répondu sur la localisation de certaines statues-menhirs et stèles, ainsi que m’avoir fourni quelques références bibliographiques fort utiles.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Tell a Cromlech from a Quoit ©
    How to tell a cromlech from a quoit © As you might have guessed from the title, this article looks at different types of Neolithic or early Bronze Age megaliths and burial mounds, with particular reference to some well-known examples in the UK. It’s also a quick overview of some of the terms used when describing certain types of megaliths, standing stones and tombs. The definitions below serve to illustrate that there is little general agreement over what we could classify as burial mounds. Burial mounds, cairns, tumuli and barrows can all refer to man- made hills of earth or stone, are located globally and may include all types of standing stones. A barrow is a mound of earth that covers a burial. Sometimes, burials were dug into the original ground surface, but some are found placed in the mound itself. The term, barrow, can be used for British burial mounds of any period. However, round barrows can be dated to either the Early Bronze Age or the Saxon period before the conversion to Christianity, whereas long barrows are usually Neolithic in origin. So, what is a megalith? A megalith is a large stone structure or a group of standing stones - the term, megalith means great stone, from two Greek words, megas (meaning: great) and lithos (meaning: stone). However, the general meaning of megaliths includes any structure composed of large stones, which include tombs and circular standing structures. Such structures have been found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, North and South America and may have had religious significance. Megaliths tend to be put into two general categories, ie dolmens or menhirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Ancient Astronomy Tonehenge Is One of the Most Impressive and Best Known Prehistoric Stone Monuments in the World
    Stonehenge and Ancient Astronomy tonehenge is one of the most impressive and best known prehistoric stone monuments in the world. Ever since antiquarians’ accounts began to bring the site to wider attention inS the 17th century, there has been endless speculation about its likely purpose and meaning, and a recurring theme has been its possible connections with astronomy and the skies. was it a Neolithic calendar? A solar temple? A lunar observatory? A calculating device for predicting eclipses? Or perhaps a combination of more than one of these? In recent years Stonehenge has become the very icon of ancient astronomy, featuring in nearly every discussion on the subject. And yet there are those who persist in believing that it actually had little or no connection with astronomy at all. A more informed picture has been obtained in recent years by combining evidence from archaeology and astronomy within the new interdiscipline of archaeoastronomy – the study of beliefs and practices concerning the sky in the past and the uses to which people’s knowledge of the skies were put. This leaflet attempts to summarize the evidence that the Stonehenge monument was constructed by communities with a clear interest in the sky above them. Photograph: Stonehenge in the snow. (Skyscan/english heritagE) This leaflet is one of a series produced by the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS). An electronic version is available for download at www.ras.org.uk. It has been written by the following members of the RAS Astronomical Heritage Committee: Clive Ruggles, Bill Burton, David Hughes, Andrew lawson and Derek McNally.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths, Monuments & Tombs of Wessex & Brittany
    From Stonehenge to Carnac: Megaliths, Monuments & Tombs of Wessex & Brittany Menhhir du Champs Dolent SLM (1).JPG May 25 - June 5, 2021 (12 days | 14 guests) with prehistorian Paul G. Bahn © Jane Waldbaum ©Vigneron ©AAlphabet © DChandra © DBates Archaeology-focused tours for the curious to the connoisseur “The special tour of Stonehenge was a highlight, as well as visiting the best of the best of prehistoric sites with Archaeological Institute an immensely knowledgeable guide like Paul Bahn.” of America - Grant, Ontario Lecturer xplore the extraordinary prehistoric sites of Wessex, England, & Host and Brittany, France. Amidst beautiful landscapes see world renowned, as well as lesser known, Neolithic and Bronze Age Emegaliths and monuments such as enigmatic rings of giant standing stones and remarkable chambered tombs. Dr. Paul G. Bahn is a leading archaeological writer, translator, and broadcaster in the Highlights: field of archaeology. He is a Contributing Editor of the AIA’s Archaeology magazine, • Stonehenge, the world’s most famous megalithic site, which is a and has written extensively on prehistoric UNESCO World Heritage site together with Avebury, a unique art, including the books Images of the Ice Neolithic henge that includes Europe’s largest prehistoric stone circle. Age, The Cambridge Illustrated History of Prehistoric Art, and Cave Art: A Guide to • Enigmatic chambered tombs such as West Kennet Long Barrow. the Decorated Ice Age Caves of Europe. Dr. • Carnac, with more than 3,000 prehistoric standing stones, the Bahn has also authored and/or edited many world’s largest collection of megalithic monuments. books on more general archaeological subjects, bringing a broad perspective to • The uninhabited island of Gavrinis, with a magnificent passage tomb understanding the sites and museums that is lined with elaborately engraved, vertical stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths in Ancient India and Their Possible Association to Astronomy1
    MEGALITHS IN ANCIENT INDIA AND THEIR POSSIBLE ASSOCIATION TO ASTRONOMY1 Mayank N. Vahia Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India And Manipal Advanced Research Group, Manipal University Manipal – 576104, Karnataka, India. E-mail: [email protected] Srikumar M. Menon Faculty of Architecture, Manipal Institite of Technology Manipal – 576104, Karnataka, India. E-mail: [email protected] Riza Abbas Indian Rock Art Research Centre, Nashik (a division of Indian Numismatic, Historical and Cultural Research Foundation), Nashik E-mail: [email protected] Nisha Yadav Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The megalithic monuments of peninsular India, believed to have been erected in the Iron Age (1500BC – 200AD), can be broadly categorized into sepulchral and non-sepulchral in purpose. Though a lot of work has gone into the study of these monuments since Babington first reported megaliths in India in 1823, not much has been understood about the knowledge systems extant in the period these were built – in science and engineering, especially mathematics and astronomy. We take a brief look at the archaeological understanding of megaliths, before taking a detailed assessment of a group of megaliths (in the south Canara region of Karnataka state in South India) that were hitherto assumed to be haphazard clusters of menhirs. Our surveys have indicated positive correlation of sight-lines with sunrise and sunset points on the horizon for both summer and winter solstices. We identify 5 such monuments in the region and present the survey results for one of the sites, demonstrating the astronomical implications. We also discuss the possible use of the typologies of megaliths known as stone alignments/avenues as calendar devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Meditation Parkland Features Stonehenge-Like Monuments
    Island Meditation Parkland features Stonehenge-like Monuments (SEATTLE, Washington) - On a 72-acre parcel logged 20 years ago, forest, streams, ponds, and a peat bog have found new life as "Earth Sanctuary." A 500-year master plan for its restoration now guides the future of this Whidbey Island nature reserve and meditation parkland north of Seattle. More than 4,000 plants from 60 native species are being planted in the first phase of the plan, according to Dan Borroff, the project's award-winning landscape designer. The remarkable project created by a remarkable visionary, Chuck Pettis, has the environmental goal of restoring the landscape's old growth forest, wetlands, and streams - as well as providing habitat for the greatest possible diversity of bird and animal species native to Whidbey Island. See http://www.EarthSanctuary.org. "Earth Sanctuary is designed to restore wholeness to the human spirit, as well as to the natural environment" says Pettis, noted for his megalithic Stonehenge-like environmental artworks, as well as his writings. Visitors, on a reservation basis, are welcome to walk the two miles of Earth Sanctuary's forested paths and to meditate at the sites of the environmental artworks. The stone structures, designed as focal points for meditation, include a labyrinth, a dolmen, and a stone circle. In Borroff's view, planning for human response - both emotional and intellectual - is an integral part of good design. He describes his plant placement choices as "enhanced environmentalism." Borroff believes that the project will "nurture our spirit and transform and re-empower our passion for the land." Pettis, author of Secrets of Sacred Space: Discover and Create Places of Power ($20, Llewellyn), has financed the entire project with personal funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Laos' Plain of Menhirs
    Laos’ Plain of Menhirs The formal conservation process for the Houaphanh menhirs has been underway for nearly twenty years. What has actually been accomplished during this period, and how are the material condition of the landscape and the artefacts now, compared with the situation between 1999 and 2002 when the authors did research on the menhirs and designed/installed interpretive signage at the site? Alan Potkin and Catherine Raymond report. At least 1,500 years ago, people whose origin and fate we know almost nothing of have erected hundreds of menhirs along 10 km of summit trails atop forested mountains in the present Houaphanh province, eastern Laos. Three lower saddles were favoured for the main menhir fields, linked one to the next by isolated menhir clusters. The menhirs themselves, in the form of long and narrow blades, are plaques of cut schist erected upright, one behind the other, with the tallest often in the middle. Interspersed among the groups of menhirs, in no discernable order are burial chambers set deep in the bedrock. Access to the ..................................................... SPAFA Journal Vol. 22 No. 2 1 opening below was often through a narrow vertical chimney equipped with steps. Each of these was covered by an enormous stone disk up to several metres in diametre. In 1931, the sites around San Kong Phan were surveyed and partially excavated by a team from Ecole Française d’Extrême- Orient (EFEO), led by archaeologist Madeleine Colani (Colani 1932). With four decades of bitter warfare soon to follow, the Houaphanh menhirs were not further researched until 2001, when it became known that an international development project providing vehicular access to isolated upland communities that had been dependent on opium production, inadvertantly caused substan- tive damage – both directly and indirectly – to several of the menhir sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Étude Sur Quelques Éléments Figuratifs Des Statues-Menhirs Et Stèles Européennes Du Néolithique À L'age Du Bronze
    Étude sur quelques éléments figuratifs des statues-menhirs et stèles européennes du Néolithique à l'Age du Bronze Lhonneux Tatiana Master en histoire de l'art et archéologie Orientation générale – Option générale – Finalité approfondie Directeur : Pierre Noiret Lecteurs : Marcel Otte – Nicolas Cauwe Volume II Université de Liège – Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres Année académique 2018-2019 Introduction Ce catalogue rassemble 217 statues-menhirs et stèles européennes, reprises dans un recueil d'illustrations. J'ai tenté de diversifier les types de documents par des photographies en noir et blanc, en couleur et par des dessins. Il faut préciser toutefois que certains clichés présentent une qualité médiocre, faute d'avoir mieux à proposer. Certaines périodes, plus anciennes, posent plus de problématiques que d’autres, c’est la raison pour laquelle j’ai décidé de me concentrer sur elles : il s’agit du Néolithique, du Chalcolithique ainsi que de l’Age du Bronze. La datation des monuments peut varier au cours de mon analyse. Je me suis basée, en effet, sur les chronologies les plus fréquentes afin de placer les monuments dans une période donnée. Pour s'entendre sur les termes utilisés, vous trouverez, ci-dessous, une définition de chaque type de sculptures : – statue-menhir : L'expression « statue-menhir » a été créée par l'abbé Hermet1: c'est d'abord une statue, sous la forme d'une pierre épaisse ovale, ogivale ou rectangulaire2, s'efforçant à représenter un corps humain par son bas-relief et une silhouette humaine par sa mise en forme. Sa réalisation peut être grossière ou stylisée. C'est, ensuite, une sculpture qui se dresse comme un menhir3 (terme apparu pour la première fois sous la plume de l'abbé Hermet en 1891) fichée en terre.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Megalithic Europe
    Alan Mattlage, February 1st. 1997 Stonehenge and Megalithic Europe Since the 17th century, antiquarians and archeologists have puzzled over Stonehenge and similar megalithic monuments. Our understanding of these monuments and their builders has, however, only recently gone beyond very preliminary speculation. With the advent of radiocarbon dating and the application of a variety of sciences, a rough picture of the monument builders is slowly taking shape. The remains of deep sea fish in Mesolithic trash heaps indicate that northern Europeans had developed a sophisticated seafaring society by 4500 BC. The subsequent, simultaneous construction of megalithic monuments in Denmark-Sweden, Brittany, Portugal, and the British Isles indicates the geographic distribution of the society's origins, but eventually, monument construction occurred all across northwestern Europe. The monument builders' way of life grew out of the mesolithic economy. Food was gathered from the forest, hunted, or collected from the sea. By 4000 they began clearing patches of forest to create an alluring environment for wild game as well as for planting crops. This marks the start of the Neolithic period. Their material success produced the first great phase of megalithic construction (c. 4200 to 3200). The earliest monuments were chambered tombs, built by stacking enormous stones in a table-like structures, called "dolmens," which were then covered with earth. We call the resulting tumuli a "round barrow." Local variations of this monument-type can be identified. Elaborate "passage graves" were built in eastern Ireland. Elaborate "passage graves" were built in eastern Ireland. These were large earthen mounds covering a corridor of stones leading to a corbeled chamber.
    [Show full text]