Security Council Provisional Seventy-Fourth Year
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA Received Little Or No Humanitarian Assistance in More Than 10 Months
currently estimated to be living in hard to reach or besieged areas, having REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA received little or no humanitarian assistance in more than 10 months. 07 February 2014 Humanitarian conditions in Yarmouk camp continued to worsen with 70 reported deaths in the last 4 months due to the shortage of food and medical supplies. Local negotiations succeeded in facilitating limited amounts of humanitarian Part I – Syria assistance to besieged areas, including Yarmouk, Modamiyet Elsham and Content Part I Barzeh neighbourhoods in Damascus although the aid provided was deeply This Regional Analysis of the Syria conflict (RAS) is an update of the December RAS and seeks to Overview inadequate. How to use the RAS? bring together information from all sources in the The spread of polio remains a major concern. Since first confirmed in October region and provide holistic analysis of the overall Possible developments Syria crisis. In addition, this report highlights the Map - Latest developments 2013, a total of 93 polio cases have been reported; the most recent case in Al key humanitarian developments in 2013. While Key events 2013 Hasakeh in January. In January 2014 1.2 million children across Aleppo, Al Part I focuses on the situation within Syria, Part II Information gaps and data limitations Hasakeh, Ar-Raqqa, Deir-ez-Zor, Hama, Idleb and Lattakia were vaccinated covers the impact of the crisis on neighbouring Operational constraints achieving an estimated 88% coverage. The overall health situation is one of the countries. More information on how to use this Humanitarian profile document can be found on page 2. -
Good News & Information Sites
Written Testimony of Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) National President Morton A. Klein1 Hearing on: A NEW HORIZON IN U.S.-ISRAEL RELATIONS: FROM AN AMERICAN EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM TO POTENTIAL RECOGNITION OF ISRAELI SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE GOLAN HEIGHTS Before the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on National Security Tuesday July 17, 2018, 10:00 a.m. Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2154 Chairman Ron DeSantis (R-FL) Ranking Member Stephen Lynch (D-MA) Introduction & Summary Chairman DeSantis, Vice Chairman Russell, Ranking Member Lynch, and Members of the Committee: Thank you for holding this hearing to discuss the potential for American recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, in furtherance of U.S. national security interests. Israeli sovereignty over the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights is a key bulwark against radical regimes and affiliates that threaten the security and stability of the United States, Israel, the entire Middle East region, and beyond. The Golan Heights consists of strategically-located high ground, that provides Israel with an irreplaceable ability to monitor and take counter-measures against growing threats at and near the Syrian-Israel border. These growing threats include the extremely dangerous hegemonic expansion of the Iranian-Syrian-North Korean axis; and the presence in Syria, close to the Israeli border, of: Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Quds forces; thousands of Iranian-armed Hezbollah fighters; Palestinian Islamic Jihad (another Iranian proxy); Syrian forces; and radical Sunni Islamist groups including the al Nusra Levantine Conquest Front (an incarnation of al Qaeda) and ISIS. The Iranian regime is attempting to build an 800-mile land bridge to the Mediterranean, running through Iraq and Syria. -
Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests
Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests Jim Nichol, Coordinator Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs March 5, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33407 Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests Summary Russia made uneven progress in democratization during the 1990s, but this limited progress was reversed after Vladimir Putin rose to power in 1999-2000, according to many observers. During this period, the State Duma (lower legislative chamber) became dominated by government- approved parties, gubernatorial elections were abolished, and the government consolidated ownership or control over major media and industries, including the energy sector. The Putin government showed low regard for the rule of law and human rights in suppressing insurgency in the North Caucasus, according to critics. Dmitry Medvedev, Putin’s longtime protégé, was elected president in 2008; President Medvedev immediately designated Putin as prime minister and continued Putin’s policies. In August 2008, the Medvedev-Putin “tandem” directed military operations against Georgia and recognized the independence of Georgia’s separatist South Ossetia and Abkhazia, actions condemned by most of the international community. In late 2011, Putin announced that he would return to the presidency and Medvedev would become prime minister. This announcement, and flawed Duma elections at the end of the year, spurred popular protests, which the government addressed by launching a few reforms and holding pro-Putin rallies. In March 2012, Putin was (re)elected president by a wide margin. The day after Putin’s inauguration in May 2012, the legislature confirmed Medvedev as prime minister. -
Fourth Annual UN Briefings and Luncheon US Alternate Representative for Special Political Affairs to the UN Delivers Keynote Address
The Women’s Leadership, Global Engagement VOLUME 1II, ISSUE II Fourth Annual UN Briefings and Luncheon US Alternate Representative for Special Political Affairs to the UN Delivers Keynote Address New York, NY – On May 1, 2009, the and cited a recent example of the US Women’s Foreign Policy Group hosted Mission’s success in rallying the Security its fourth annual UN Briefings and Council to unanimously condemn North Luncheon focusing on World Crises and Korea's launch of a rocket using ballistic the UN: from Sudan to the Democratic missile technology, which violated Security Republic of Congo to Afghanistan. The Council prohibitions. conference drew over 100 participants (3) A strong global leadership on climate from corporations, non-profits, change. On this point, Ambassador foundations, international organizations, DiCarlo noted that the General Assembly B. Lynn Pascoe Ambassador the media, and the diplomatic will also focus efforts toward a global Rosemary DiCarlo community. warming agreement by the end of this year Ambassador Rosemary DiCarlo, US Alternate Representative and expressed gratitude that Secretary- for Special Political Affairs to the UN, delivered the keynote General Ban Ki-moon is a strong advocate address, US Priorities at the UN, at the luncheon. The on this issue. conference also featured briefings by Eva Busza, Principal (4) A commitment to increasing the UN's Officer for the Strategic Planning Unit, Office of the Secretary capacity for peacekeeping missions. General, on The UN Secretary General's Top Priorities and Ambassador DiCarlo explained how Challenges; Radhika Coomaraswamy, Under-Secretary- increased peacekeeping missions can be Radhika General, Special Representative for Children and Armed an effective tool in managing conflicts Coomaraswamy Conflict, on Protecting Children in Armed Conflict; B. -
S/Res/2426 (2018)
United Nations S/RES/2426 (2018) Distr.: General Security Council 29 June 2018 Resolution 2426 (2018) Adopted by the Security Council at its 8303rd meeting, on 29 June 2018 The Security Council, Noting with concern that the situation in the Middle East is tense and is likely to remain so, unless and until a comprehensive settlement covering all aspects of the Middle East problem can be reached, Having considered the report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) of 11 June 2018 (S/2018/550) and also reaffirming its resolution 1308 (2000) of 17 July 2000, Stressing that both parties must abide by the terms of the 1974 Disengagement of Forces Agreement between Israel and the Syrian Arab Republic and scrupulously observe the ceasefire, Concurring with the Secretary-General’s findings that the ongoing military activities conducted by any actor in the area of separation continue to have the potential to escalate tensions between Israel and the Syrian Arab Republic, jeopardize the ceasefire between the two countries, and pose a risk to the local civilian population and United Nations personnel on the ground, Expressing alarm that recent escalation of violence in the Syrian Arab Republic risks a serious conflagration of the conflict in the region Expressing grave concern at all violations of the Disengagement of Forces Agreement, Stressing that there should be no military forces in the area of separation other than those of UNDOF, Strongly condemning the continued fighting in the area of separation, -
National Committee on American Foreign Policy
NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICYNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICYNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICYNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICYNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICYNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICYNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICYNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY A BRIEF PHOTOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW NEW YORK National Committee on American Foreign Policy 320 Park Ave 3rd Floor New York, NY 10022 2014 www.ncafp.org • 212-224-1120 [email protected] ICY NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY ICY NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY N OUR MISSION CONTENTS Letter from the Chairman ........................ i The National Committee on American Foreign Policy (NCAFP) was founded in 1974 by Professor Hans J. Morgenthau and others. It is a nonprofit activist organization dedicated to the resolution of conflicts that threaten U.S. interests. Toward that end, the NCAFP identifies, articulates, and helps advance American foreign policy NCAFP Leaders ............................ 1 interests from a nonpartisan perspective within the framework of political realism. Hans Joachim Morgenthau ........................ 2 Six Principles of Political Realism ..................... 3 American foreign policy interests include: Birth of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy ........... 4 • preserving and strengthening national security; George D. Schwab ........................... 5 • supporting countries committed to the values and the practice of political, religious, and cultural pluralism; • improving U.S. relations with the developed and developing worlds; Transatlantic Relations ......................... 7 • advancing human rights; The Middle East ............................ 9 • encouraging realistic arms control agreements; William J. -
Lessonsforpeace. United Nations Security Council Estonian
2 3 #LessonsForPeace United Nations Security Council Estonian Presidency Arria-Formula Meeting on 8 May 2020 75 Years Since the End of World War II on European Soil – Lessons Learned for Preventing Future Atrocities, Responsibility of the Security Council #LessonsForPeace United Nations Security Council Estonian Presidency Arria-Formula Meeting on 8 May 2020 75 Years Since the End of World War II on European Soil – Lessons Learned for Preventing Future Atrocities, Responsibility of the Security Council Collection of Statements Tallinn 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword by Foreign Minister Urmas Reinsalu ......................... 8 1. Josep Borrell Fontelles, European Union ............................ 13 2. Rosemary A. DiCarlo, United Nations .................................. 20 3. Timothy Snyder, Yale University ........................................... 25 4. Germany ......................................................................................... 30 5. Viet Nam ......................................................................................... 33 6. France ............................................................................................... 36 7. Belgium ............................................................................................ 39 8. Dominican Republic .................................................................... 42 9. United Kingdom ........................................................................... 45 10. United States of America ........................................................ -
The Strategy Behind Israel's Attack on Iran And
The Strategy Behind Israel’s Attack on Iran and Hizballah By Jonathan Cook Region: Middle East & North Africa Global Research, January 22, 2015 In-depth Report: IRAN: THE NEXT WAR? Jonathan Cook's Blog Israel’s claims of an imminent threat of Hizballah attack are not credible. More likely it wants to subdue the Lebanese militia so that it has a free hand to manipulate the Syrian battlefield to its advantage. Israel has good reason to fear that the Lebanese militia Hizballah and Iran’s Revolutionary Guard will seek dramatic revenge for the killing of 12 senior figures from the two organisations in an air strike in Syria on Sunday. Israel’s concerns were underscored on Wednesday by the decision of its military chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to cancel a trip to meet his European counterparts, as the Israeli army remained on high alert. Earlier, on Monday, Israel moved an Iron Dome anti-missile battery to the northern border, in case of rocket fire from Hizballah. That is precisely what Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah had vowed only last week if Israel continued to launch attacks on Syrian soil. “We consider that any strike against Syria is a strike against the whole of the resistance axis, not just against Syria,” he said, adding that he had many long- range Iranian rockets that could reach deep into the Galilee. General Ali Jafari, commander of the Revolutionary Guard, echoed that warning on Tuesday, saying Israel should wait for “devastating thunderbolts”, and that Israel’s air strike had created “a new beginning point for the imminent collapse of the Zionist regime”. -
Ambassador Rosemary Dicarlo Shares Abou...Eadership And
11/16/2016 Ambassador Rosemary DiCarlo Shares About Women, Leadership And Advancing Foreign Policy Kathy Caprino Women@Forbes I cover careers, leadership and women in business. LEADERSHIP 11/14/2016 @ 2:32PM 187 views Ambassador Rosemary DiCarlo Shares About Women, Leadership And Advancing Foreign Policy Kathy Caprino , Women@Forbes Part Of The Series “Women, Leadership And Vision” Ambassador Rosemary A. DiCarlo (ret.) – Photo by Demetriad Studios According to the organization U.N. Women, a global champion for gender equality, “there is established and growing evidence that women’s leadership in political decision-making processes improves them.” Their research reveals that: “…women demonstrate political leadership by working across party lines through parliamentary women’s caucuses – even in the most politically combative environments – and by championing issues of gender equality, such as the elimination http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathycaprino/2016/11/14/ambassador-rosemary-dicarlo-shares-about-women-leadership-and-advancing-foreign-policy/print/ 1/7 11/16/2016 Ambassador Rosemary DiCarlo Shares About Women, Leadership And Advancing Foreign Policy of gender-based violence, parental leave and childcare, pensions, gender-equality laws and electoral reform.” To learn more about how women’s participation in top political leadership roles is making a critical and positive difference in our world, I was honored and thrilled to connect with Ambassador Rosemary A. DiCarlo (ret.). DiCarlo is President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Committee for American Foreign Policy and a Senior Fellow at the Jackson Institute for Global Affairs at Yale University. She previously served as U.S. Deputy Representative to the United Nations from 2010 to 2014. -
Rebalancing Three UN Peacekeeping Missions by Assaf Orion
MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3051 The Big, the Small, and the Needless: Rebalancing Three UN Peacekeeping Missions by Assaf Orion Dec 14, 2018 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Assaf Orion Assaf Orion, a retired Israeli brigadier general and defense strategist whose broad research scope ranges from relations with China to Israel’s regional political-military strategy and policy, is the Liz and Mony Rueven International Fellow with The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis A former Israeli general explains why rethinking the missions is crucial to containing Iran’s proxies and reducing waste in international security expenditures. n recent weeks, Israel has sought to address Hezbollah cross-border attack tunnels, asked Washington to impose I sanctions on Beirut, and conferred with U.S. officials about countering precision missile production inside Lebanon. As tensions mount, one fact has become clearer than ever: the UN peacekeeping missions deployed around Israel are dangerously mismatched. To address this problem, the international community should substantially downsize UNIFIL, enhance UNDOF, and incorporate UNTSO into those two missions. UNIFIL: OVERSIZED T he current UN Interim Force in Lebanon mission (UNIFIL II) goes back to UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 Lebanon war. Because that conflict was instigated by Hezbollah military actions emanating from south Lebanon, the resolution sought to avert another war by asserting Beirut’s monopoly over armed forces near Israel, with UNIFIL supporting the Lebanese Armed Forces in this vision. Moreover, given the war-torn theater it was entering and the weakness of its LAF partner, UNIFIL was granted a large land force (up to 15,000 troops), a significant Maritime Task Force to prevent seaborne weapons transfers, and a rich toolkit for civil engineering projects and civilian outreach. -
Women Appointed to Presidential Cabinets
WOMEN APPOINTED TO PRESIDENTIAL CABINETS Eleven women have been confirmed to serve in cabinet (6) and cabinet level (5) positions in the Biden administration.1 A total of 64 women have held a total of 72 such positions in presidential administrations, with eight women serving in two different posts. (These figures do not include acting officials.) Among the 64 women, 41 were appointed by Democratic presidents and 23 by Republican presidents. Only 12 U.S presidents (5D, 7R) have appointed women to cabinet or cabinet-level positions since the first woman was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933.2 Party breakdown of women appointed to Presidential Cabinets: 41D 23R Cabinet or Cabinet-level Firsts: First Woman First Black Woman First Latina First Asian Pacific First Native Appointed Appointed Appointed Islander Woman American Woman Appointed Appointed Frances Perkins Patricia Roberts Aída Álvarez Elaine Chao Debra Haaland Secretary of Labor Harris Administrator, Secretary of Labor Secretary of the 1933 (Roosevelt) Secretary of Small Business 2001 (G.W. Bush) Interior Housing and Urban Administration 2021 (Biden) Development 1997 (Clinton) 1977 (Carter) To date, 27 cabinet or cabinet-level posts have been filled by women. Cabinet and cabinet-level positions vary by presidential administration. Our final authority for designating cabinet or cabinet-level in an 1 This does not include Shalanda Young, who currently serves as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 2 In addition, although President Truman did not appoint any women, Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins, a holdover from the Roosevelt administration, served in his cabinet. © COPYRIGHT 2021 Center for American Women and Politic, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University 4/6/2021 administration is that president's official library. -
General Assembly Distr.: General 5 October 2000
United Nations A/55/453 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 October 2000 Original: English Fifty-fifth session Agenda item 85 Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories Note by the Secretary-General* 1. The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the General Assembly the thirty-second report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 54/76 of 6 December 1999. 2. This report should be considered together with the Special Committee’s periodic reports (A/55/373 and Add.1). * The footnote requested by the General Assembly in its resolution 54/248 was not included in the submission. 00-67563 (E) 261000 ````````` A/55/453 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction .......................................................... 1–3 3 II. Mandate ............................................................. 4–12 3 A. General background ............................................... 4–9 3 B. General Assembly resolution 54/76 of 6 December 1999 ................. 10 4 C. Reports of the Special Committee .................................... 11–12 4 III. Organization of work .................................................. 13–31 4 A. Meetings ........................................................ 13–18 4 B. Nature of evidence ................................................ 19–25 5 C. Other aspects ..................................................... 26–31 5 IV. Observations and recommendations....................................... 32–144 6 A. Situation of human rights of the Palestinian people in the occupied territories: Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem ....................