DOCSLIB.ORG

Layers in the Determiner Phrase Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Layers in the Determiner Phrase Edition This work is a revision of my 1995 University of Rochester dissertation (refer- enced as Zamparelli 1995, distributed as a Cogsci technical report in 1996), intended for web distribution. Most of the changes consist of footnotes added or modified; ref- erences have been updated when necessary, and an index has been added at the end. There are also minor revisions in the text, particularly in chapter 1, “Preliminaries” and section 4.3, “Spec/head agreement.” Needless to say, these changes do not mean that I have tried to make the dissertation fully consistent with my current thinking on the structure and interpretation of DPs. I have, however, inserted pointers to later work when possible. The dissertation is to be published by Garland, in the series “Outstanding Disser- tations in Linguistics”. Note that, due to changes in the format and content, the page numbers in this ‘draft’ distribution version differ both from the numbers in the 1996 Technical Report and from the Garland edition. Section numbers and titles differ very occasionally from those in the 1995/96 original, and are identical to the Garland Layers in the Determiner Phrase edition. It is advisable to use these when citing. The author can be reached at the following address: Roberto Zamparelli Facolta` di Lingue Universita` di Bergamo University of Rochester P.zza Vecchia 8 24129 Bergamo, Italy REVISION: tel: +39-035-277239 e-mail: [email protected] FEBRUARY 2000 ii Acknowledgments A careful observer of academic life might have noticed that, toward the end of their dissertation, graduate students spend a lot of time in the library, browsing through dissertations. They are not collecting references, but samplying acknowledgment sections, in order to write their own. Indeed, a class that teaches the art of writing acknowledgments is sorely mis- sed. As for wedding invitations, there seem to be two styles; some students thank everybody, for speaking, listening or just existing at the right time and place; others thank very sparingly, only Those Who Truly Helped. Anything in between is felt to be unfair to the names that didn’t quite make it—the boundary cases. Of course, the longer the list, the more boundary cases. The moral is: fair acknowledgment is impossible. Having said this, I move on to write one of these unfair, mid-of-the-road acknowledgment sections. First, many thanks to my advisor, Greg Carlson, who listened to a lot of strange ideas on the way to this text, and always had helpful remarks, suggestions and point- ers, even when my ideas concerned aspects of linguistic theory that were far from his domain of expertise. He has been a source of constant encouragement through the years. Having Sandro Zucchi as a professor in Rochester, as a committee member for my dissertation, and as a friend has been a big privilege. He has shaped the way I do linguistics as perhaps nobody else has, giving me an incredibly generous amount of his time, the most detailed comments, and the sharpest criticism. He made arguing fun. I owe to Itziar Laka a sense of what it means to look at syntax with the Big Ques- tions in mind. Her provocative style of teaching is one of the best I have encountered, and has had a big influence on me. Our ideas on how to play life and linguistics are very different, but her viewpoint is powerful, and I respect it. With her, I wish to thank all the professors who played a role in shaping my education: Tom Bever, Yoshi Kitagawa, Peter Lasersohn, Jeff Runner, Len Schubert, Mike Tanenhaus and several more. Special dissertation thanks to Chris Barker—discussions in his office were frequently enlightening (Westerners can be Enlightened over and over)—and to Whitney Tabor. iii iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Finally, Pino Longobardi is not in my committee only for logistic reasons. The semester I spent in Venice, working with him, is at the origin of this dissertation, which is largely based on his views of the syntax/semantics interplay. Likewise, I want to thank Guglielmo Cinque, Gennaro Chierchia, Giuliana Giusti, Valentina Bianchi and all the other linguistically important people of the time spent in Italy, for extremely interesting discussions and comments. Abstract Sometimes, writing a dissertation on the syntax/semantics interface seems like having to write a seamless document in two languages. Talking with my fellow students in both fields has been a big help in sorting things out. In particular, thanks to Massimo Poesio, Naoya Fujita, Janet Hitzeman, Koji Hoshi, Daniel Ardron, and Julie Sedivy. A truly special thank to Graham Katz. We have gone a long way The main focus of the dissertation is on the existence of multiple structural layers together. within noun phrases, and the claim that each layer is endowed with a different se- As this text was taking shape, I came upon two dissertations that changed it mantic function. In particular, I will focus on the topmost part of the noun phrase, deeply; one is by Andrea Moro, the other, by Louise McNally. I owe them a great the one containing determiners and quantifiers, proposing that this part should be deal. split into two maximal projections which together constitute the ‘determiner system.’ My life in Rochester would have been much less rich experience without the I propose that the highest maximal projection contains ‘strong’ determiners (in the ‘Barnfell’ Coop. Thanks to all the Barnfellites (Barnfallen?), and in particular to Bev- sense of Milsark, 1974), proper names and personal pronouns, while the intermediate erly Spejevski, Boris Goldowski and Derek Gross. Also, thanks to Roberta Colon, projection contains those determiners that can appear in predicative position (indef- for reminding me of many deadlines, and to Harold Paredes-Frigolet, for forcing my inites, plus the definite determiner in a well-specified set of cases); below this layer, mind away from linguistics in the darkest days of Deep Writing. On the typographi- we have other functional projections, and finally the NP proper. cal side, the look of this dissertation is due to the authors of GNU Emacs and LATEX, The existence of multiple functional projections raises the question of how their but in equal measure to our local wizard, Chris Giordano. I don’t know what I would heads can be licensed. I will argue that in some cases, an abstract functional head have produced without him. Last but not least, Becca Webb, Jeff Runner, Whitney can be licensed if a modifier of the appropriate type is generated or moved into its Tabor and Greg Carlson corrected my English, a major and occasionally amusing specifier. In English and Italian, movement to this specifier position is usually visible task. through the appearence of the preposition “of” (di in Italian). This will account A large part of the past years has been spent in Italy. Having a lot of friends that for a variety of ill-understood constructions across Romance and Germanic, such as gave me a charge to endure Rochester’s long winters was probably instrumental in the ‘kind’-construction (“this kind of car” and “a car of this kind”), which will be finishing. Without my family, and without Birgit, I doubt I would have ever made it. uniformly reduced to small-clauses plus raising, in parallel with current analyses of To them, my deepest gratitude. copular constructions at the sentential level (“John is the culprit” and “the culprit is John”). Taken together, the idea of multiple levels with different interpretations and the idea of noun-phrase internal raising to specifier position will be a powerful tool to explain the behavior of object clitics in Italian, the presuppositional aspect of the strong/weak distinction for determiners, the different distribution of noun phrases within There-sentences in Italian and English, and the internal structure of a special kind of definite predicates in copular constructions. Finally, in the last chapter I will turn to an examination of the internal structure of the Adjective Phrase across Italian and English, giving evidence that many of the phenomena identified at the Noun Phrase level can be found in the Adjective Phrase as well. The semantic reflexes of these syntactic phenomena can explain the presence or absence of presuppositions associated with adjectives and measure phrases. The analysis will be cast in a general Government and Binding approach (Chom- v vi ABSTRACT sky, 1981, Chomsky 1986a, Chomsky 1986b), also using some notions from the Minimalist Program of Chomsky (1992), Chomsky (1994). Contents Introduction 1 1 Preliminaries 5 1.1 Semantics preliminaries: type-shifting . 5 1.1.1 Problems for invisible type-shifting operators . 8 1.1.2 Type-shifting and specificity . 9 1.1.3 Quantifiers: e-type at LF . 11 1.1.4 Introduction to the layer system . 14 1.1.5 The semantic contribution . 18 1.2 Syntactic preliminaries: the DP hypothesis . 19 1.2.1 Functional projections . 20 1.2.2 N-movement . 21 1.2.3 The relative position of N and attributive adjectives . 22 1.2.4 Attributive adjectives in predicative position . 25 1.3 What this dissertation is not about . 29 1.4 Data . 29 1.5 Terminological conventions . 31 1.6 Overview of the contents . 33 2 The Strong/Weak Distinction and the Definiteness Effect 37 2.1 Introduction . 37 2.2 The ‘strong/weak’ distinction . 38 2.2.1 Existential Sentences . 38 2.2.2 Numerals in ES . 40 2.3 Treatments of the Definiteness Effect . 44 2.3.1 Milsark (1977) . 44 2.3.2 ES in Generalized Quantifier Theory . 45 2.3.3 Heim on WHs in ES . 48 2.3.4 Presuppositional Set Theories of ES . 50 2.3.5 McNally (1992) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Internal Syntax of the Chimakonde Determiner Phrase
    THE INTERNAL SYNTAX OF THE CHIMAKONDE DETERMINER PHRASE By DOMINICK MAKANJILA Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Professor Marianna W. Visser April 2019 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: April 2019 Copyright © 2019 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT In the Government-and-Binding theory of generative syntax (cf. Chomsky, 1981), it was posited that a functional head D(eterminer) heads a noun phrase (NP). This view is referred to as a Determiner Phrase (DP) hypothesis (Abney, 1987). English articles are uncontroversially viewed as instantiations of D. Consequently, some scholars hold that a DP projects only in languages with articles (cf. Bruening, 2009). However, the universal view of the DP hypothesis, which this study also invokes, is that both languages with and without articles project a DP (cf. Veselovská, 2014). It is argued that articles (like those found in English) are not the only forms through which the functional category D can manifest. Different languages have different manifestations of the functional category D. The category D is viewed as the locus of (in)definiteness and (non-)specificity).
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIONAL NOUNS, PRONOUNS, and Resumptionw Relational Nouns, Such As Neighbour, Mother, and Rumour, Present a Challenge to Synt
    Linguistics and Philosophy (2005) 28:375–446 Ó Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s10988-005-2656-7 ASH ASUDEH RELATIONAL NOUNS, PRONOUNS, AND RESUMPTIONw ABSTRACT. This paper presents a variable-free analysis of relational nouns in Glue Semantics, within a Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) architecture. Rela- tional nouns and resumptive pronouns are bound using the usual binding mecha- nisms of LFG. Special attention is paid to the bound readings of relational nouns, how these interact with genitives and obliques, and their behaviour with respect to scope, crossover and reconstruction. I consider a puzzle that arises regarding rela- tional nouns and resumptive pronouns, given that relational nouns can have bound readings and resumptive pronouns are just a specific instance of bound pronouns. The puzzle is: why is it impossible for bound implicit arguments of relational nouns to be resumptive? The puzzle is highlighted by a well-known variety of variable-free semantics, where pronouns and relational noun phrases are identical both in category and (base) type. I show that the puzzle also arises for an established variable-based theory. I present an analysis of resumptive pronouns that crucially treats resumptives in terms of the resource logic linear logic that underlies Glue Semantics: a resumptive pronoun is a perfectly ordinary pronoun that constitutes a surplus resource; this surplus resource requires the presence of a resumptive-licensing resource consumer, a manager resource. Manager resources properly distinguish between resumptive pronouns and bound relational nouns based on differences between them at the level of semantic structure. The resumptive puzzle is thus solved. The paper closes by considering the solution in light of the hypothesis of direct compositionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistics 21N - Linguistic Diversity and Universals: the Principles of Language Structure
    Linguistics 21N - Linguistic Diversity and Universals: The Principles of Language Structure Ben Newman March 1, 2018 1 What are we studying in this course? This course is about syntax, which is the subfield of linguistics that deals with how words and phrases can be combined to form correct larger forms (usually referred to as sentences). We’re not particularly interested in the structure of words (morphemes), sounds (phonetics), or writing systems, but instead on the rules underlying how words and phrases can be combined across different languages. These rules are what make up the formal grammar of a language. Formal grammar is similar to what you learn in middle and high school English classes, but is a lot more, well, formal. Instead of classifying words based on meaning or what they “do" in a sentence, formal grammars depend a lot more on where words are in the sentence. For example, in English class you might say an adjective is “a word that modifies a noun”, such as red in the phrase the red ball. A more formal definition of an adjective might be “a word that precedes a noun" or “the first word in an adjective phrase" where the adjective phrase is red ball. Describing a formal grammar involves writing down a lot of rules for a language. 2 I-Language and E-Language Before we get into the nitty-gritty grammar stuff, I want to take a look at two ways language has traditionally been described by linguists. One of these descriptions centers around the rules that a person has in his/her mind for constructing sentences.
    [Show full text]
  • Syntax of Elliptical and Discontinuous Nominals
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Syntax of Elliptical and Discontinuous Nominals A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Linguistics by Dimitrios Ntelitheos 2004 1 The thesis of Dimitrios Ntelitheos is approved. _________________________________ Anoop Mahajan _________________________________ Timothy A. Stowell _________________________________ Hilda Koopman, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2004 2 στον Αλέξανδρο … για κείνον που ήρθε ανάµεσά µας να σφίξει τα δαχτυλά µας στην παλάµη … Μ. Αναγνωστάκης 3 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 Nominal Ellipsis and Discontinuity as Sister Operations 6 2.1 Nominal Ellipsis as NP-Topicalization 6 2.1.1 Ellipsis and Movement 6 2.1.2 On a Nominal Left Periphery 10 2.1.3 On the Existence of a Nominal FocusP 12 2.1.4 On the existence of a Nominal TopicP 18 2.2 Focus as a Licensing Mechanism for Nominal Ellipsis 25 2.2.1 Against a pro Analysis of Nominal Ellipsis 25 2.2.2 Focus Condition on Ellipsis 30 2.3 Topicalization and Focalization in Discontinuous DPs 33 2.4 Ellipsis and rich morphology 38 2.5 Fanselow & Ćavar (2002) 51 3 Common Properties Between Nominal Ellipsis and Discontinuous DPs 54 3.1 Same Type of Modifiers 54 3.2 Morphological Evidence 58 4 Some Problems 60 4.1 Restrictions on Discontinuity 60 4.2 Discontinuity without Nominal Ellipsis 64 5 Conclusion 69 References 70 4 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Syntax of Elliptical and Discontinuous Nominals by Dimitrios Ntelitheos Master of Arts in Linguistics University of California, Los Angeles, 2003 Professor Hilda Koopman, Chair This thesis proposes a new analysis of two superficially different phenomena – nominal ellipsis and discontinuous DPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Possessive Nominal Expressions in GB: DP Vs. NP
    Possessive Nominal Expressions in GB: DP vs. NP Daniel W. Bruhn December 8, 2006 1 Introduction 1.1 Background Since Steven Abney's 1987 MIT dissertation, The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect, the so- called DP Hypothesis has gained acceptance in the eld of Government and Binding (GB) syntax. This hypothesis proposes that a nominal expression1 is headed by a determiner that takes a noun phrase as its complement. The preexisting NP Hypothesis, on the other hand, diagrams nominal expressions as headed by nouns, sometimes taking a determiner phrase as a specier.2 This basic dierence is illustrated in the following trees for the nominal expression the dog: NP DP DP N0 D0 D0 N0 D0 NP dog the D0 N0 the N0 dog The number of dierent types of nominal expressions that could serve as the basis for an NP vs. DP Hypothesis comparison is naturally quite large, and to address every one would be quite a feat for this squib. I have therefore chosen to concentrate on possessive nominal expressions because they exhibit a certain array of properties that pose challenges for both hypotheses, and will present these according to the following structure: Section 2.1 (Possessive) nominals posing no problem for either hypothesis Section 2.2 Problem nominals for the NP Hypothesis Section 2.3 How the DP Hypothesis accounts for the problem nominals of the NP Hypothesis Section 2.4 Problem nominals for the DP Hypothesis Section 2.5 How the NP Hypothesis accounts for the problem nominals of the DP Hypothesis By problem nominals, I mean those which expose some weakeness in the ability of either hypothesis to: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Prepositional Phrase in Second Language Acquisition a Research Report
    The German Prepositional Phrase in Second Language Acquisition A Research Report Katharina Turgay Abstract Due to their complex morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties, PPs in German are a challenge for acquisition, especially for children who learn German as their second language. This research report presents the results of an experiment conducted with Turkish and Italian speak- ing children in the process of acquiring German as an L2 to study the particular difficulties the complex nature of PPs poses for learners. The data drawn from the experiments is evaluated with respect to two pos- sible influence factors on the L2 acquisition: the L1 of the L2ers and the age that the learners had been at when they had their first contact with the target language. The results of the study suggest that both factors may have an influence on the L2 acquisition of the German PP,at least in some domains. Tendencies that the subjects’ L1 matters for the L2 acquisition are attested for many properties of the PP – the position of the preposi- tion and the cliticization of prepositions and determiners being the main exceptions. Regarding the relevance of the age of first contact, my data shows that the younger the children were when starting to acquire Ger- man, the better they perform. 1 Introduction In this paper, I will present the findings of my research on the German preposi- tional phrase in second language (L2) acquisition. Due to their complex mor- phological, syntactic, and semantic properties, prepositional phrases (PPs) al- ready raise challenges to children acquiring German as a first language (L1ers).
    [Show full text]
  • Bilingual Sentence Production and Code-Switching: Neural Network Simulations
    Bilingual sentence production and code-switching: Neural network simulations Chara Tsoukala 556869-L-bw-Tsoukala Processed on: 9-3-2021 PDF page: 1 The educational component of the doctoral training was provided by the International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Language Sciences. The graduate school is a joint initiative between the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and two partner institutes at Radboud University – the Centre for Language Studies, and the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour. The IMPRS curriculum, which is funded by the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science, ensures that each member receives interdisciplinary training in the language sciences and develops a well-rounded skill set in preparation for fulfilling careers in academia and beyond. More information can be found at www.mpi.nl/imprs ISBN: 978-94-92910-27-1 Cover design: Amalia Tsichla Printed by: Ipskamp printing Layout: This thesis was typeset with LATEX2ε. It uses the Clean Thesis style developed by Ricardo Langner. © Chara Tsoukala, 2021. All rights reserved. This thesis was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Gravitation Grant 024.001.006 to the Language in Interaction Consortium. 556869-L-bw-Tsoukala Processed on: 9-3-2021 PDF page: 2 Bilingual sentence production and code-switching: Neural network simulations Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. J.H.J.M. van Krieken, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 21 april 2021 om 14.30 uur precies door Chara Tsoukala geboren op 18 april 1986 te Athene (Griekenland) 556869-L-bw-Tsoukala Processed on: 9-3-2021 PDF page: 3 Promotor Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • On the DP/NP Analysis of Mandarin Chinese and Its Implications
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 17 Issue 1 Proceedings of the 34th Annual Penn Article 8 Linguistics Colloquium 2011 On the DP/NP Analysis of Mandarin Chinese and its Implications Hsu-Te Johnny Cheng University of Connecticut Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Cheng, Hsu-Te Johnny (2011) "On the DP/NP Analysis of Mandarin Chinese and its Implications," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 17 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol17/iss1/8 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol17/iss1/8 For more information, please contact [email protected]. On the DP/NP Analysis of Mandarin Chinese and its Implications Abstract In this paper, I examine the nominal structure in Mandarin Chinese (MC). Specifically, I discuss the issue of whether the DP projection is always present in syntax (the Universal DP Hypothesis) or the existence of DP may be dependent on languages (the DP/NP Parameter). Based on a test established in Despic ́ (2009), I examine the relevant data in MC and argue that, contrary to the claim traditionally held in the literature, DP does not exist in MC. Using tests from binding paradigm, it is further shown that classifiers do head their own projections in MC, as previously argued in the literature. Similar examination is also applied to Japanese to show that Japanese behaves alike with MC in two respects. First, DP does not exist in Japanese, either. Second, classifiers are also heading their projection, not merely adjoined to NPs.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Re-Visiting the DP
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Re-Visiting the DP Hypothesis: An Exploration Through English/Korean Codeswitching A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Linguistics By Sarah Phillips May 2017 Copyright by Sarah Phillips 2017 ii The thesis of Sarah Phillips is approved: _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. Joseph Galasso Date _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. Sharon Klein Date _________________________________________ ______________ Dr. David Medeiros, Chair Date California State University, Northridge iii Acknowledgements While watching an episode of “Abstact,” I was able to see into the mind of Platon, an amazing photographer who has captured passionate portraits. He says the following, “great design simplifies a very complicated world.” I believe that is the essence of theory. To see through noise and find what lays underneath, causing both form and noise, is incredibly difficult, however. My mentors, David Medeiros and Sharon Klein, helped keep my focus lens clear. This is true in both this writing process as well as my development into becoming an academic of merit and ability. Joseph Galasso, an important reader in this process, reminded me to remember the basics and question often. I appreciate these people for grounding me, keeping form in mind. Baring contrast, my friends and family kept my mind and hands active. They have challenged me, loved me, and motivated me. A few of whom I’d like to name (in random order) are: my mother Jahye, Maya W. C., Lu L., my cousin Paula, my sister Erica, Melissa M.-S., Cristina N., Bianca M., Ashleigh G., and Jacquelyn N. Without these people (and a few others whom I failed to mention—my apologies!), the noise would have become unbearable.
    [Show full text]
  • 73 the Structure of Determiner Phrases and Noun Phrases in Kanuri
    The structure of determiner phrases and noun phrases in Kanuri: Minimalist approach Baba Kura Alkali Gazali & Umar Mohammed Gombe Abstract This paper examines the structure of determiner phrase (DP) and noun phrase (NP) in Kanuri within the theoretical framework of Minimalist Program (MP) by Chomsky (1995). In conducting the research, the researchers use their native speakers’ intuition and other three competent native speakers for data collection and validation of data. The study describes the structure of determiner phrase headed by a covert determiner in Kanuri and the syntactic functions of noun phrase in Kanuri sentence structures. In the structure of determiner phrase, the study identifies head slots and post-head slots in Kanuri as against pre-head slots identified by Fannami et al (1999). On the functions of determiner phrase and noun phrase in Kanuri sentences, the study identifies determiner phrase and noun phrase function as subjects, indirect objects and direct objects in Kanuri sentences. Finally on the Minimalist account, the study identifies Empty Projection Principle [EPP] in a specifier position under the NP moves to a specifier position under the DP in order to check the Phi –features and constraints involved in moving PP node which cannot be merged as specifier due to its selectional properties in Kanuri. Key words: Kanuri, Determiner, Noun, Minimalist, Specifier 73 Journal of Linguistics, Language and Culture Vol. 7 No. 1, 2020 1.0 Introduction Kanuri is a member of the Saharan branch of the Nilo-Saharan phylum of African languages (Greenberg, 1963, 1977). Bendo (2000:44) presents the Saharan branch according to the following group: Saharan: Kanuri-Kanumbu, Daza, Teda-Tebu, Zaghawa- Bideyat-Berti.
    [Show full text]
  • A Minimalist Analysis of English Topicalization: a Phase-Based Cartographic Complementizer Phrase (CP) Perspective
    J UOEH 38（ 4 ）: 279－289（2016） 279 ［Original］ A Minimalist Analysis of English Topicalization: A Phase-Based Cartographic Complementizer Phrase (CP) Perspective Hiroyoshi Tanaka* Department of English, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan. Yahata- nishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan Abstract : Under the basic tenet that syntactic derivation offers an optimal solution to both phonological realization and semantic interpretation of linguistic expression, the recent minimalist framework of syntactic theory claims that the basic unit for the derivation is equivalent to a syntactic propositional element, which is called a phase. In this analysis, syntactic derivation is assumed to proceed at phasal projections that include Complementizer Phrases (CP). However, there have been pointed out some empirical problems with respect to the failure of multiple occurrences of discourse-related elements in the CP domain. This problem can be easily overcome if the alternative approach in the recent minimalist perspective, which is called Cartographic CP analysis, is adopted, but this may raise a theoretical issue about the tension between phasality and four kinds of functional projections assumed in this analysis (Force Phrase (ForceP), Finite Phrase (FinP), Topic Phrase (TopP) and Focus Phrase (FocP)). This paper argues that a hybrid analysis with these two influential approaches can be proposed by claiming a reasonable assumption that syntacti- cally requisite projections (i.e., ForceP and FinP) are phases and independently constitute a phasehood with relevant heads in the derivation. This then enables us to capture various syntactic properties of the Topicalization construction in English. Our proposed analysis, coupled with some additional assumptions and observations in recent minimalist studies, can be extended to incorporate peculiar properties in temporal/conditional adverbials and imperatives.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Quantification and Wh-In-Situ in Mandarin Chinese
    Quantification and wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese: An Introduction* VICTOR JUNNAN PAN The Chinese University of Hong Kong 1. Introduction Despite superficially observed distinctions, human languages share many common characteristics in a fundamental way, which is biologically and genetically determined. “Principles and Parameters” is a generative syntactic modal to capture this property of human language. Common characteristics shared by different languages are determined by principles which do not vary from one language to another; however, individual properties observed in a given language are determined by parameters. Thus, it is important to understand in what specific way an individual language is different from the others and this is a scientific way to conduct researches on language typology. This article aims to illustrate such a point with a concrete example based on quantification in formal linguistics. Readers interested in the generative syntax can refer to Haegemann (1994) and Ouhalla (1999) for a complete introduction to the Government and Binding Theory and the modal of Principles and Parameters. In this section, I only give a very brief presentation of the relevant terminology to be used in this article. Table 1 includes basic phrase types that I will use.1 NP Noun Phrase book, table DP Determiner Phrase a book, the book, some book PP Prepositional Phrase on the table VP Verb Phrase John love Mary TP Tense Phrase John loves Mary. (Full declarative sentence) CP Complementizer Phrase (I think) that John loves Mary. (Subordinate clauses) What will John eat? (Root questions) Table 1 The article is organized as follows: section 2 introduces the quantification theory in formal linguistics; section 3 examines one particular type of quantification: wh- quantification in English; sections 4 to 6 present different analyses of wh- quantification in Chinese and section 7 concludes the paper.
    [Show full text]