Automatic Weather Stations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

$1 !( Sanae IV Automatic Weather Stations Jan-1 !( !( Jan-2 *# A!(ntarctica - 2020 Soerasen !( Troll *#*# !( Camp Maudheimvida !( H128 !( Joinville Is !( Molodeznaya !( Hurd Nordenskiold Utsteinen !( !( !( !( Juan Carlos I Kohnen Base Byers !( MD78 *# Mizuho Gabriel de Castilla !(!( !( !. !( JASE2007# Cierva Cove Larsen C North Halley 6A * *# Relay Station Amsler Island !. Larsen C West !( !( Mawson AWS 1 !( *# !( NDF *#!( Dome Fuji (JPN) Inset Map A !. Butler Is La Grange Nunatak !( Bisco Island !( "/ Dome Fuji Whitlock *# Dismal Is Filchner !( !( !( *# Baldrick Limbert !( Lucia Fossil Bluff Manuela !( Druznaja-4 Davis Virginia !( PANDA-North !( !( #!( Kunlun Taishan !( !( !( Whoop *!( Sky-Blu !(!( Whoop Inexpressible K1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Eagle !( Island 1, 3, 4 !(!( Rita Skytrain Ice Rise !( Jang Bogo !(!( "/ PANDA-South*# !( Panda 400 Panda 100 Maria Eneide "/ Union Glacier Austin*# *# Henry Panda 300 Panda 200 !( Zoraida "/ *# Dome A Panda 1100 Penguin !( Thiel Mountains Nico !( Lola *# !( Kathie*# Kominko- AGO-4 Thurston Island Slade (WAIS) Theresa Modesta !( *# *# !( *# *# Erin *# Harry Styx Glacier Bunger Hills !( *# Sabrina Bear Peninsula (KOR) Byrd *# *# !( Alessandra !(*# Elizabeth *# Emma Concordia Haupt *# AGO-5 Dome C II Nunatak !( Bear Peninsula Janet *# Siple Dome *# Lettau# Elaine *# !( !( Nansen Ice Shelf * Dome C Snyder *#!(!( DC N !(!( Rocks !( Hercules Neve Schwerdtfeger !( Dome C (FRA) !(!( Marilyn !( !( Margaret *# #*# Law Dome Silvia 0 50 km Gill*# * Cape !( !( *#*#!( Summit/A Russkaya Vito*#*#*#*#$1*#$1!.!.!. Wilkins Runway Poinsett *#$1$1*#$1*#$1!($1$1$1*#!(.$1!.!(.!(!!.( !( Giulia *# *# !( !( West 4m / East ICAO See Inset Map B Elephant Moraine Inset Map B *# *# *# Alexander !( D-85 Tall Tower! *#!( See Inset Map A !(!( !( Sofia-B !( !( !( Irene *# !(!(!( !( Minna Bluff *# !( Paola D-47 !( # *# D-0 Minna Bluff Cape Hallett *#* *#!( D-3 Possession Is *# D-10 D-17 *# Linda Herbie Alley N !( Emilia *# LTER AWS (14) Cp Denison White Is !. Leningradskaya *# Cp Spencer Phoenix 0 500 km *# Lorne $1 !. Don Juan Pond *# $1 *# Sarah !. Jules !. White Is S $1 *# $1 !( !. White Out *#*#!( Scott Base $1 !.!. Bull Pass United States AWS International AWS Biesiada Crevasse $1 $1 $1 !.!. !(!. Bull Pass East !( $1 Willie Field !.!. !( !( #* Univ. of Wisconsin (UW) !( Australia Netherlands N Crevasse *# $1 Butter Pt - !. #* UW / Australia !( Belgium/Netherlands !( New Zealand Ferrell Ford Tent Is Ferrar !. Mt Fleming *# Rock $1 *#!($1 #* UW / Belgium/Netherlands !( Brazil !( Norway $1 Cp Royds !( #* !( !( Russia Windless Victoria Valley UW / China China Cones !( South Africa Bight #* UW / France !( China/Australia Marble Pt II #* !( Laurie II# !( Granite Harbour UW / Japan !( Finland South Korea * *# Marble Pt #* UW / MATC !( France !( Spain Cp Bird #* !( Germany !( United Kingdom 0 100 km UW / United Kingdom $1 NIWC !( !( Italy Arelis Other AWS !( !. Other US !( Japan "/ Commercial Coastline: ADD v4.1, 2003; Cartography: June 2020 Sam Batzli, SSEC, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Funding: National Science Foundation Grant Number 1924730 *#.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

'Landscapes of Exploration' Education Pack
Landscapes of Exploration February 11 – 31 March 2012 Peninsula Arts Gallery Education Pack Cover image courtesy of British Antarctic Survey Cover image: Launch of a radiosonde meteorological balloon by a scientist/meteorologist at Halley Research Station. Atmospheric scientists at Rothera and Halley Research Stations collect data about the atmosphere above Antarctica this is done by launching radiosonde meteorological balloons which have small sensors and a transmitter attached to them. The balloons are filled with helium and so rise high into the Antarctic atmosphere sampling the air and transmitting the data back to the station far below. A radiosonde meteorological balloon holds an impressive 2,000 litres of helium, giving it enough lift to climb for up to two hours. Helium is lighter than air and so causes the balloon to rise rapidly through the atmosphere, while the instruments beneath it sample all the required data and transmit the information back to the surface. - Permissions for information on radiosonde meteorological balloons kindly provided by British Antarctic Survey. For a full activity sheet on how scientists collect data from the air in Antarctica please visit the Discovering Antarctica website www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk and select resources www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk has been developed jointly by the Royal Geographical Society, with IBG0 and the British Antarctic Survey, with funding from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) supports geography in universities and schools, through expeditions and fieldwork and with the public and policy makers. Full details about the Society’s work, and how you can become a member, is available on www.rgs.org All activities in this handbook that are from www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk will be clearly identified.
[Show full text]
Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica
Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica Sergey Tarasenko Supervisor: Neil Gilbert GCAS 2008/2009 Table of content Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................................3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 1 Basic principles of wastewater treatment for small objects .....................................................5 1.1 Domestic wastewater characteristics....................................................................................5 1.2 Characteristics of main methods of domestic wastewater treatment .............................5 1.3 Designing of treatment facilities for individual sewage disposal systems...................11 2 Wastewater treatment in Antarctica..........................................................................................13 2.1 Problems of transferring treatment technologies to Antarctica .....................................13 2.1.1 Requirements of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty / Wastewater quality standards ...................................................................................................13 2.1.2 Geographical situation......................................................................................................14 2.1.2.1 Climatic conditions....................................................................................................14
[Show full text]
Office of Polar Programs
DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
[Show full text]
THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L
THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L. M. Forbes. Editorial Committee: B. B. Roberts, G. de Q. Robin, Sir J. M. Wordie Vol. 9 January 1959 No. 61 CONTENTS The Scott Polar Research Institute page 297 ARTICLES : The Canadian Northern Insect Survey, 1947-57. By T. N. Freeman 299 Recent economic developments in northern Quebec and Labrador. By J. Brian Bird . 308 Iron ore in Arctic Europe. By P. A. B. Gethin .... 314 Geodetic survey of northern Canada by shoran trilateration. By Angus C. Hamilton 320 The manuscript collection of the Scott Polar Research Institute. By Ann Savours .......... 331 FIELD WORK: British expedition to Vestspitsbergen, 1956 . • . 336 French expedition to central Greenland, 1956-57 .... 336 British expedition to north-west Greenland, 1957 .... 336 Soviet Arctic expeditions, 1957 337 The Northern Sea Route in 1957 337 Swedish-Finnish-Swiss International Geophysical Year Expedition to Nordaustlandet, 1957-58; and Swedish Expedition to Nordaust- landet, 1958-59: Season 1957-58. ...... 338 Swedish Glaciological Expedition to Nordaustlandet, 1958 . 339 Under-ice crossing of the Arctic basin: U.S.S. Nautilus and U.S.S. Skate, 1958 340 . Arctic Institute Greenland Expedition, 1958 341 British naval hydrographic surveys in the Falkland Islands Depen- dencies, 1956-57 and 1957-58 '. 341 The Australian automatic weather station on Lewis Islet, Wilkes Land 342 Anglo-American physiological team in Ross Dependency, 1957-58 . 343 NOTES : Extension of International Geophysical Year activities into 1959 . 345 Norwegian-Soviet sealing agreement, 1958 ..... 845 Tenth meeting of the International Whaling Commission, 1958 . 349 New Soviet ice-strengthened ships 350 New geographical institute in Siberia 350 ig Pit 296 CONTENTS NOTES (cont.) Soviet organizations concerned with the Antarctic .
[Show full text]
Reconstructions of Antarctic Topography Since the Eocene–Oligocene T Boundary ⁎ Guy J.G
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 535 (2019) 109346 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Reconstructions of Antarctic topography since the Eocene–Oligocene T boundary ⁎ Guy J.G. Paxmana, , Stewart S.R. Jamiesona, Katharina Hochmuthb,c, Karsten Gohlb, Michael J. Bentleya, German Leitchenkovd,e, Fausto Ferracciolif a Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK b Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz-Center for Polar and Marine Sciences, Bremerhaven, Germany c School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK d Institute for Geology and Mineral Resources of the World Ocean, St. Petersburg, Russia e Institute of Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia f British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK ABSTRACT Accurate models of past Antarctic ice sheet behaviour require realistic reconstructions of the evolution of bedrock topography. However, other than a preliminary attempt to reconstruct Antarctic topography at the Eocene–Oligocene boundary, the long-term evolution of Antarctica's subglacial topography throughout its glacial history has not previously been quantified. Here, we derive new reconstructions of Antarctic topography for four key time slices in Antarctica's climate andglacial history: the Eocene–Oligocene boundary (ca. 34 Ma), the Oligocene–Miocene boundary (ca. 23 Ma), the mid-Miocene climate transition (ca. 14 Ma), and the mid- Pliocene warm period (ca. 3.5 Ma). To reconstruct past topography, we consider a series of processes including ice sheet loading, volcanism, thermal subsidence, horizontal plate motion, erosion, sedimentation and flexural isostatic adjustment, and validate our models where possible using onshore and offshore geological constraints. Our reconstructions show that the land area of Antarctica situated above sea level was ~25% larger at the Eocene–Oligocene boundary than at the present-day.
[Show full text]
Station Sharing in Antarctica
IP 94 Agenda Item: ATCM 7, ATCM 10, ATCM 11, ATCM 14, CEP 5, CEP 6b, CEP 9 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Station Sharing in Antarctica 1 IP 94 Station Sharing in Antarctica Information Paper Submitted by ASOC to the XXIX ATCM (CEP Agenda Items 5, 6 and 9, ATCM Agenda Items 7, 10, 11 and 14) I. Introduction and overview As of 2005 there were at least 45 permanent stations in the Antarctic being operated by 18 countries, of which 37 were used as year-round stations.i Although there are a few examples of states sharing scientific facilities (see Appendix 1), for the most part the practice of individual states building and operating their own facilities, under their own flags, persists. This seems to be rooted in the idea that in order to become a full Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party (ATCP), one has to build a station to show seriousness of scientific purpose, although formally the ATCPs have clarified that this is not the case. The scientific mission and international scientific cooperation is nominally at the heart of the ATS,ii and through SCAR the region has a long-established scientific coordination body. It therefore seems surprising that half a century after the adoption of this remarkable Antarctic regime, we still see no truly international stations. The ‘national sovereign approach’ continues to be the principal driver of new stations. Because new stations are likely to involve relatively large impacts in areas that most likely to be near pristine, ASOC submits that this approach should be changed. In considering environmental impact analyses of proposed new station construction, the Committee on Environmental Protection (CEP) presently does not have a mandate to take into account opportunities for sharing facilities (as an alternative that would reduce impacts).
[Show full text]
Download (Pdf, 236
Science in the Snow Appendix 1 SCAR Members Full members (31) (Associate Membership) Full Membership Argentina 3 February 1958 Australia 3 February 1958 Belgium 3 February 1958 Chile 3 February 1958 France 3 February 1958 Japan 3 February 1958 New Zealand 3 February 1958 Norway 3 February 1958 Russia (assumed representation of USSR) 3 February 1958 South Africa 3 February 1958 United Kingdom 3 February 1958 United States of America 3 February 1958 Germany (formerly DDR and BRD individually) 22 May 1978 Poland 22 May 1978 India 1 October 1984 Brazil 1 October 1984 China 23 June 1986 Sweden (24 March 1987) 12 September 1988 Italy (19 May 1987) 12 September 1988 Uruguay (29 July 1987) 12 September 1988 Spain (15 January 1987) 23 July 1990 The Netherlands (20 May 1987) 23 July 1990 Korea, Republic of (18 December 1987) 23 July 1990 Finland (1 July 1988) 23 July 1990 Ecuador (12 September 1988) 15 June 1992 Canada (5 September 1994) 27 July 1998 Peru (14 April 1987) 22 July 2002 Switzerland (16 June 1987) 4 October 2004 Bulgaria (5 March 1995) 17 July 2006 Ukraine (5 September 1994) 17 July 2006 Malaysia (4 October 2004) 14 July 2008 Associate Members (12) Pakistan 15 June 1992 Denmark 17 July 2006 Portugal 17 July 2006 Romania 14 July 2008 261 Appendices Monaco 9 August 2010 Venezuela 23 July 2012 Czech Republic 1 September 2014 Iran 1 September 2014 Austria 29 August 2016 Colombia (rejoined) 29 August 2016 Thailand 29 August 2016 Turkey 29 August 2016 Former Associate Members (2) Colombia 23 July 1990 withdrew 3 July 1995 Estonia 15 June
[Show full text]
Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
[Show full text]
Marine Research in the Latitudinal Gradient Project Along Victoria Land, Antarctica*
SCI. MAR., 69 (Suppl. 2): 57-63 SCIENTIA MARINA 2°°* THE MAGELLAN-ANTARCTIC CONNECTION: LINKS AND FRONTIERS AT HIGH SOUTHERN LATITUDES. W.E. ARNTZ, G.A. LOVRICH and S. THATJE (eds.) Marine research in the Latitudinal Gradient Project along Victoria Land, Antarctica* PAUL ARTHUR BERKMAN >, RICCARDO CATTANEO-VIETTI, MARIACHIARA CHIANTORE2, CLIVE HOWARD-WILLIAMS3, VONDA CUMMINGS 3 andRIKKKVITEK4 1 Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA. E- mail: [email protected] 2DIPTERIS, University di Genova, 1-16132 Genoa, Italy. 3 National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Riccarton, Christchurch, New Zealand. 4 Earth Systems Science and Policy, California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA 93955 USA. SUMMARY: This paper describes the conceptual framework of the Latitudinal Gradient Project that is being implemented by the New Zealand, Italian and United States Antarctic programmes along Victoria Land, Antarctica, from 72°S to 86°S. The purpose of this interdisciplinary research project is to assess the dynamics and coupling of marine and terrestrial ecosys tems in relation to global climate variability. Preliminary data about the research cruises from the R/V "Italica" and R/V "Tangaroa" along the Victoria Land Coast in 2004 are presented. As a global climate barometer, this research along Victo ria Land provides a unique framework for assessing latitudinal shifts in 'sentinel' environmental transition zones, where cli mate changes have an amplified impact on the phases of water. Keywords: Latitudinal Gradient Project, Victoria Land, Antarctic, global climate change, interdisciplinary cooperation. RESUMEN: INVESTIGACIONES MARINAS A LO LARGO DE VICTORIA LAND. - Este trabajo describe el marco conceptual del pro- yecto "Gradiente latitudinal" que ha sido implementado por los programas antarticos de Nueva Zelanda, Italia y EE.UU.
[Show full text]
Antarctic Treaty Handbook
Annex Proposed Renumbering of Antarctic Protected Areas Existing SPA’s Existing Site Proposed Year Annex V No. New Site Management Plan No. Adopted ‘Taylor Rookery 1 101 1992 Rookery Islands 2 102 1992 Ardery Island and Odbert Island 3 103 1992 Sabrina Island 4 104 Beaufort Island 5 105 Cape Crozier [redesignated as SSSI no.4] - - Cape Hallet 7 106 Dion Islands 8 107 Green Island 9 108 Byers Peninsula [redesignated as SSSI no. 6] - - Cape Shireff [redesignated as SSSI no. 32] - - Fildes Peninsula [redesignated as SSSI no.5] - - Moe Island 13 109 1995 Lynch Island 14 110 Southern Powell Island 15 111 1995 Coppermine Peninsula 16 112 Litchfield Island 17 113 North Coronation Island 18 114 Lagotellerie Island 19 115 New College Valley 20 116 1992 Avian Island (was SSSI no. 30) 21 117 ‘Cryptogram Ridge’ 22 118 Forlidas and Davis Valley Ponds 23 119 Pointe-Geologic Archipelago 24 120 1995 Cape Royds 1 121 Arrival Heights 2 122 Barwick Valley 3 123 Cape Crozier (was SPA no. 6) 4 124 Fildes Peninsula (was SPA no. 12) 5 125 Byers Peninsula (was SPA no. 10) 6 126 Haswell Island 7 127 Western Shore of Admiralty Bay 8 128 Rothera Point 9 129 Caughley Beach 10 116 1995 ‘Tramway Ridge’ 11 130 Canada Glacier 12 131 Potter Peninsula 13 132 Existing SPA’s Existing Site Proposed Year Annex V No. New Site Management Plan No. Adopted Harmony Point 14 133 Cierva Point 15 134 North-east Bailey Peninsula 16 135 Clark Peninsula 17 136 North-west White Island 18 137 Linnaeus Terrace 19 138 Biscoe Point 20 139 Parts of Deception Island 21 140 ‘Yukidori Valley’ 22 141 Svarthmaren 23 142 Summit of Mount Melbourne 24 118 ‘Marine Plain’ 25 143 Chile Bay 26 144 Port Foster 27 145 South Bay 28 146 Ablation Point 29 147 Avian Island [redesignated as SPA no.
[Show full text]
Geologic Map of the Davis Valley Quadrangle and Part of the Cordiner Peaks Quadrangle, Pensacola Mountains, Antarctica
-0 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE DAVIS VALLEY QUADRANGLE AND PART OF THE CORDINER PEAKS QUADRANGLE, PENSACOLA MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA By Arthur B. Ford, Dwight L. Schmidt, and Walter W. Boyd, Jr. Prepared by the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY under the auspices of the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION -N V'l 0 0 0 0 U.S. ANTARCTIC RESEARCH PROGRAM MAP Published by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1978 G GEOLOGIC MAP SYMBOLS COMMONLY USED ON MAPS OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (Special symbols are shown in explanation) Contact-Dashed where approximately Strike and dip of beds-Ball indicates located; short dashed where inferred; top of beds known from sedimentary dotted where concealed structures _1!_ Inclined EB Horizontal Contact-Showing dip; well exposed at -+- Vertical Overturned triangle -..J!. Strike and dip of foliation Fault-Dashed where approximately located; short dashed where inferred; ~ Inclined -+·Vertical +Horizontal dotted where concealed Strike and dip of cleavage Fault, showing dip-Ball and bar on ~ Inclined ~Vertical +Horizontal downthrown side Bearing and plunge of lineation Normal fault-Hachured on down '~Inclined • Vertical - Horizontal thrown side Strike and dip of joints Fault-Showing relative horizontal -~ Inclined --Vertical +Horizontal movement Note: Planar symbols (strike and dip + + + + + + Thrust fault-Sawteeth on upper plate of beds, foliation or schistosity, and cleav age) may be combined with linear symbols to record data observed at ~ Anticline-Showing direction of plunge; same locality by superimposed symbols dashed where approximately located; at point of observation. Coexisting dotted where concealed planar symbols are shown intersecting at point of observation.
[Show full text]
Waba Directory 2003
DIAMOND DX CLUB www.ddxc.net WABA DIRECTORY 2003 1 January 2003 DIAMOND DX CLUB WABA DIRECTORY 2003 ARGENTINA LU-01 Alférez de Navió José María Sobral Base (Army)1 Filchner Ice Shelf 81°04 S 40°31 W AN-016 LU-02 Almirante Brown Station (IAA)2 Coughtrey Peninsula, Paradise Harbour, 64°53 S 62°53 W AN-016 Danco Coast, Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-19 Byers Camp (IAA) Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island, South 62°39 S 61°00 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-04 Decepción Detachment (Navy)3 Primero de Mayo Bay, Port Foster, 62°59 S 60°43 W AN-010 Deception Island, South Shetland Islands LU-07 Ellsworth Station4 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°38 S 41°08 W AN-016 LU-06 Esperanza Base (Army)5 Seal Point, Hope Bay, Trinity Peninsula 63°24 S 56°59 W AN-016 (Antarctic Peninsula) LU- Francisco de Gurruchaga Refuge (Navy)6 Harmony Cove, Nelson Island, South 62°18 S 59°13 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-10 General Manuel Belgrano Base (Army)7 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°46 S 38°11 W AN-016 LU-08 General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army)8 Bertrab Nunatak, Vahsel Bay, Luitpold 77°52 S 34°37 W AN-016 Coast, Coats Land LU-09 General Manuel Belgrano III Base (Army)9 Berkner Island, Filchner-Ronne Ice 77°34 S 45°59 W AN-014 Shelves LU-11 General San Martín Base (Army)10 Barry Island in Marguerite Bay, along 68°07 S 67°06 W AN-016 Fallières Coast of Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-21 Groussac Refuge (Navy)11 Petermann Island, off Graham Coast of 65°11 S 64°10 W AN-006 Graham Land (West); Antarctic Peninsula LU-05 Melchior Detachment (Navy)12 Isla Observatorio
[Show full text]