DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of Inspections Under Article 7 of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of Its Protocol on Environmental Protection, 1959- 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

º XXVI ATCM Information Paper IP-118-ASOC/UNEP/Rev.1 Agenda Item: ATCM 11 ASOC/UNEP Original: English A REVIEW OF INSPECTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 7 OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY AND ARTICLE 14 OF ITS PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1959-2001 Madrid, 9/20 de junio 2003 1 XXVI ATCM Information Paper 118/Rev.1 June 2003 Original: English Agenda Item 11 A REVIEW OF INSPECTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 7 OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY AND ARTICLE 14 OF ITS PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1959- 2001 Submitted to the XXVI ATCM by the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition and the United Nations Environment Programme 2 A REVIEW OF INSPECTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 7 OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY AND ARTICLE 14 OF ITS PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1959- 2001 I. INTRODUCTION Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty enable Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties to conduct inspections in order to promote the objectives and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Antarctic Treaty and its Protocol. Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty establishes the right of free access for observation and inspection by the Contracting Parties. Observers designed under Article VII (1) “shall have complete freedom of access”, including the conducting of aerial observations, “at any time to any or all areas of Antarctica.” The facilities that may be inspected include “all stations, installations and equipment within those areas, and all ships and aircraft at points of discharging or embarking cargoes or personnel in Antarctica.” Article 14 of the Protocol establishes that Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties “shall arrange, individually or collectively, for inspections by observers to be made in accordance with Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty.” During inspections, observers should be given access to “all parts of stations, installations, equipment, ships and aircraft open to inspection under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty, and to all records” that are maintained at those facilities in accordance to Protocol requirements. According to current practice, draft inspection reports are submitted to the inspected Parties for comments. They are subsequently made available to the Antarctic Treaty Parties and to the Committee for Environmental Protection, considered at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting that follows the inspection, and thereafter made publicly available. This report reviews past inspections with the view to inform the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties on the practice of inspections and assist them in planning future inspections. In agreement with the objectives of the Protocol, including its Article 14, the purpose of this report is to promote the protection of the Antarctic environment and dependent and associated ecosystems. The report focuses specifically on a number of aspects including: total number of official inspections and inspected sites or facilities; trends in official inspection frequency; geographical distribution of official inspections; Parties conducting inspections; official inspection frequency at each site or facility; official inspections of commercial tourism activities and non-governmental facilities; and, site or facility review visits carried by Non-Parties. II. METHODOLOGY A) List of inspections A tentative list of past inspections carried out under the Antarctic Treaty and its Protocol between 1959 and 2001 was compiled by the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC). The compiled list is 3 reproduced in Annex I. The list was based on: ! Inspection reports, some of which list earlier inspections to a site or facility; ! A list of inspections contained in Annex E to the Final Report of the XVIII ATCM; ! A list of inspections contained in Working Paper 34 submitted by Australia to the XXV ATCM. With technical support from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), a set of maps were created to visualize the geographical distribution of past inspections, as well as to represent some other aspects of inspections in a spatial context. These maps are at Appendix I. B) List of sites and facilities There is no official list of all sites and facilities in Antarctica. Such a list would help identify sites and facilities that have not yet been inspected. The Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes (COMNAP) has posted on its web site a list of Antarctic stations. As of May 2003, the list contains 82 stations, of which 73 are located within the Antarctic Treaty Area (see Annex II). The COMNAP’s list, however, mentions primarily stations that are currently operational. As such, it does not include all the sites or facilities that had been inspected so far. Indeed, there are 32 inspected sites or facilities — excluding vessels — that are not on COMNAP’s list. In addition, there are National Antarctic Programmes for which the main stations are listed but not the additional facilities, such as substantial field camps. The United Kingdom’s Antarctic Pilot and the SCAR’s Gazetter provide more comprehensive lists of Antarctic sites and facilities. The 1997 edition of the Antarctic Pilot lists 177 research stations and refuge huts inside the Antarctic Treaty Area, 27 aircraft landing places, 20 Specially Protected Areas, 35 Sites of Special Scientific Interest, and 72 Historic Sites and Monuments. However, it is likely that there are sites and facilities that are not reflected in those lists. In this regard, it is hoped that a more complete compilation of sites and facilities will be developed as Parties to the Protocol implement Art 8 (3) of Annex III of the Protocol, which requires that “Each such Party shall, as far as is practicable, also prepare an inventory of locations of past activities (such as traverses, fuel depots, field bases, crashed aircraft) before the information is lost…”. For the purpose of this review, an ad hoc list of sites and facilities was produced that included in extenso the COMNAP’s list and derived additional information from the Antarctic Pilot. The ad hoc list is given at Annex III. It is clear that the tentative list of inspections and the ad hoc list of sites and facilities prepared for the purpose of this report are not exhaustive. In addition, both lists may contain erroneous information. ASOC would very much welcomed comments from Parties that could help improve both lists towards a more comprehensive review of the practice of inspection in Antarctica. 4 III. RESULTS A) Total number of official inspections and inspected sites or facilities The total number of official inspections1 conducted between 1959 and 2001 is 36, of which nine were carried out between 1992 and 2001, and four in the period 1998-20012 (see Table 1). The total number of inspected sites or facilities3 between 1959 and 2001 is 265, of which 89 were inspected between 1992 and 2001, and 46 in the period 1998-20014. B) Trends in official inspection frequency The frequency of official inspections increased during the 1959-2001 period from 0.82 inspections per annum during the period 1959-1991, to 0.83 for 1992-1997, and to 1 for 1998-2001 (see Fig.1). The frequency of inspected sites or facilities increased during the 1959-2001 period from 5.3 inspected sites or facilities per annum during the period 1959-1991, to 7.2 for 1992-1997, and 11.5 for 1998-2001 (see Fig.2). A peak in both the number of official inspections and in the number of inspected sites or facilities was recorded in the years immediately following the adoption of the 1988 Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities. 1 An inspection by official inspectors from one or more Parties to one or a number of sites or facilities - such as research stations, Historic Sites and Monuments, ships - following formal procedures under the Antarctic Treaty and the Madrid Protocol. 2 1959-1991 refers to the period from the adoption of the Antarctic Treaty up to the adoption of the Madrid Protocol (October 1991). 1992-1997 refers to the period from the adoption of the Madrid Protocol (October 1991) up to its entry into force (January 1998). 1998-2001 refers to the period from the entry into force of the Madrid Protocol (January 1998) up to June 2001. 3 An official inspection to a single site or facility. 4 It should be noted that there are have been inspections (quoted in Australia Working Paper No.34 submitted at the XXV ATCM) to an additional 28 facilities, the name of which is not available. All these inspections took place before October 1991. 5 Fig. 1 – Official inspections, 1959-2001 Fig. 2 – Number of inspected sites / facilities, 1959-2001 6 Table 1 – Tentative list of official inspections, 1959-2001 Year Inspected by Number of Region5 Source6 facilities inspected 1963 New Zealand 3 AW Auburn (1982) 1964 Australia 4 AW ATCPs (1994); Australia (2002) 1964 UK 1 RS ATCPs (1994); Australia (2002) 1964 USA 10 AW ATCPs (1994); Australia (2002) 1966 Argentina 1 AP ATCPs (1994); Australia (2002) 1967 USA 9 AW USA (1967) 1971 USA 4 EA USA (1971) 1975 USA 4 AP USA (1975) 1977 Argentina 1 Not available ATCPs (1994); Australia (2002) 1977 USA 5 AW USA (1977) 1980 USA 6 AP USA (1980) 1983 USA 14 AW USA (1983) 1985 USA 6 AP USA (1985) 1986 Australia 2 OC, EA Australia (1986) 1987 Chile 10 AP ATCPs (1994) 1988 Russia 15 AW USSR (1988) 1989 France/Germany 8 AP ATCPs (1994); Australia (2002) 1989 New Zealand 3 AP, SOI New Zealand (1989) 1989 UK/NZ 11 AP UK and New Zealand (1989) 1989 USA 16 OC, RS USA (1989) 1989 Russia 15 Not available ATCPs (1994); Australia (2002) 1990
Recommended publications
  • Air and Shipborne Magnetic Surveys of the Antarctic Into the 21St Century

    Air and Shipborne Magnetic Surveys of the Antarctic Into the 21St Century

    TECTO-125389; No of Pages 10 Tectonophysics xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Air and shipborne magnetic surveys of the Antarctic into the 21st century A. Golynsky a,⁎,R.Bellb,1, D. Blankenship c,2,D.Damasked,3,F.Ferracciolie,4,C.Finnf,5,D.Golynskya,6, S. Ivanov g,7,W.Jokath,8,V.Masolovg,6,S.Riedelh,7,R.vonFresei,9,D.Youngc,2 and ADMAP Working Group a VNIIOkeangeologia, 1, Angliysky Avenue, St.-Petersburg, 190121, Russia b LDEO of Columbia University, 61, Route 9W, PO Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, USA c University of Texas, Institute for Geophysics, 4412 Spicewood Springs Rd., Bldg. 600, Austin, Texas 78759-4445, USA d BGR, Stilleweg 2 D-30655, Hannover, Germany e BAS, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET, UK f USGS, Denver Federal Center, Box 25046 Denver, CO 80255, USA g PMGE, 24, Pobeda St., Lomonosov, 189510, Russia h AWI, Columbusstrasse, 27568, Bremerhaven, Germany i School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, 125 S. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA article info abstract Article history: The Antarctic geomagnetics' community remains very active in crustal anomaly mapping. More than 1.5 million Received 1 August 2011 line-km of new air- and shipborne data have been acquired over the past decade by the international community Received in revised form 27 January 2012 in Antarctica. These new data together with surveys that previously were not in the public domain significantly Accepted 13 February 2012 upgrade the ADMAP compilation.
  • BIRD SPECIES RECORDED at CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND, ANTARCTICA by E

    BIRD SPECIES RECORDED at CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND, ANTARCTICA by E

    BIRD SPECIES RECORDED AT CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND, ANTARCTICA By E. B. SPURR, K.-J. WILSON, and P. M. SAGAR ABSTRACT The .\delie Penguin and Antarctic Skua breed at Cape Bird, and nine other species have been recorded as visitors (Emperor Penguin, Chinstrap Penguin, Southern Giant Petrel, Antarctic Fulmar, Antarctic Petrel, Snow Petrel, Wilson's Storm Petrel, Southern Great Skua, and Southern Black-backed Gull). Fewer birds were recorded as visitors at Cape Bird than have been recorded at Capes Crozier and Royds, possibly because Cape Bird gets less wind. INTRODUCTION Cape Bird, at the northern tip of Ross Island, Antarctica, is a breeding area for the Addie Penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) and the Antarctic Skua (Stercoranus maccomicki). The breeding area extends from about 5 km to about 14 km south-west of the cape (77O 13'S, 166'28'E to 77O 18'S, 1660201E).The skuas nest over much of the area, whereas the penguins nest in three discrete areas (the Northern. Middle, and Southern Rookeries). Throughout winter, the breeding area of the birds is covered with snow and closed in by the McMurdo Sound sea-ice. The break-up of this sea-ice in spring is vitally important for the birds (Stonehouse 1967). Most of the area is free of snow before (or very soon after) the birds arrive in mid-late October. We visited Cape Bird each summer from 1967168 to 1981182 (except 1976/77) and again in 1987188, for periods of 3 - 14 weeks between 22 October and 15 February (Appendix 1). Many aspects of the biology of the two breeding species (Adelie Penguin and Antarctic Skua) have been described elsewhere (see review by Young 1981; also Davis 1988, Davis et al.
  • Concentrations, Particle-Size Distributions, and Dry Deposition fluxes of Aerosol Trace Elements Over the Antarctic Peninsula in Austral Summer

    Concentrations, Particle-Size Distributions, and Dry Deposition fluxes of Aerosol Trace Elements Over the Antarctic Peninsula in Austral Summer

    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2105–2124, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2105-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Concentrations, particle-size distributions, and dry deposition fluxes of aerosol trace elements over the Antarctic Peninsula in austral summer Songyun Fan1, Yuan Gao1, Robert M. Sherrell2, Shun Yu1, and Kaixuan Bu2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA 2Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA Correspondence: Yuan Gao ([email protected]) Received: 1 July 2020 – Discussion started: 26 August 2020 Revised: 3 December 2020 – Accepted: 8 December 2020 – Published: 12 February 2021 Abstract. Size-segregated particulate air samples were col- sition processes may play a minor role in determining trace lected during the austral summer of 2016–2017 at Palmer element concentrations in surface seawater over the conti- Station on Anvers Island, western Antarctic Peninsula, to nental shelf of the western Antarctic Peninsula. characterize trace elements in aerosols. Trace elements in aerosol samples – including Al, P, Ca, Ti, V, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ce, and Pb – were determined by total digestion and a 1 Introduction sector field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (SF-ICP-MS). The crustal enrichment factors (EFcrust) and Aerosols affect the climate through direct and indirect ra- k-means clustering results of particle-size distributions show diative forcing (Kaufman et al., 2002). The extent of such that these elements are derived primarily from three sources: forcing depends on both physical and chemical properties (1) regional crustal emissions, including possible resuspen- of aerosols, including particle size and chemical composi- sion of soils containing biogenic P, (2) long-range transport, tion (Pilinis et al., 1995).
  • Office of Polar Programs

    Office of Polar Programs

    DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
  • Antarctic Peninsula

    Antarctic Peninsula

    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
  • THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L

    THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L

    THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L. M. Forbes. Editorial Committee: B. B. Roberts, G. de Q. Robin, Sir J. M. Wordie Vol. 9 January 1959 No. 61 CONTENTS The Scott Polar Research Institute page 297 ARTICLES : The Canadian Northern Insect Survey, 1947-57. By T. N. Freeman 299 Recent economic developments in northern Quebec and Labrador. By J. Brian Bird . 308 Iron ore in Arctic Europe. By P. A. B. Gethin .... 314 Geodetic survey of northern Canada by shoran trilateration. By Angus C. Hamilton 320 The manuscript collection of the Scott Polar Research Institute. By Ann Savours .......... 331 FIELD WORK: British expedition to Vestspitsbergen, 1956 . • . 336 French expedition to central Greenland, 1956-57 .... 336 British expedition to north-west Greenland, 1957 .... 336 Soviet Arctic expeditions, 1957 337 The Northern Sea Route in 1957 337 Swedish-Finnish-Swiss International Geophysical Year Expedition to Nordaustlandet, 1957-58; and Swedish Expedition to Nordaust- landet, 1958-59: Season 1957-58. ...... 338 Swedish Glaciological Expedition to Nordaustlandet, 1958 . 339 Under-ice crossing of the Arctic basin: U.S.S. Nautilus and U.S.S. Skate, 1958 340 . Arctic Institute Greenland Expedition, 1958 341 British naval hydrographic surveys in the Falkland Islands Depen- dencies, 1956-57 and 1957-58 '. 341 The Australian automatic weather station on Lewis Islet, Wilkes Land 342 Anglo-American physiological team in Ross Dependency, 1957-58 . 343 NOTES : Extension of International Geophysical Year activities into 1959 . 345 Norwegian-Soviet sealing agreement, 1958 ..... 845 Tenth meeting of the International Whaling Commission, 1958 . 349 New Soviet ice-strengthened ships 350 New geographical institute in Siberia 350 ig Pit 296 CONTENTS NOTES (cont.) Soviet organizations concerned with the Antarctic .
  • A NEWS BULLETIN Published Quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC)

    A NEWS BULLETIN Published Quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC)

    A NEWS BULLETIN published quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC) An English-born Post Office technician, Robin Hodgson, wearing a borrowed kilt, plays his pipes to huskies on the sea ice below Scott Base. So far he has had a cool response to his music from his New Zealand colleagues, and a noisy reception f r o m a l l 2 0 h u s k i e s . , „ _ . Antarctic Division photo Registered at Post Ollice Headquarters. Wellington. New Zealand, as a magazine. II '1.7 ^ I -!^I*"JTr -.*><\\>! »7^7 mm SOUTH GEORGIA, SOUTH SANDWICH Is- . C I R C L E / SOUTH ORKNEY Is x \ /o Orcadas arg Sanae s a Noydiazarevskaya ussr FALKLAND Is /6Signyl.uK , .60"W / SOUTH AMERICA tf Borga / S A A - S O U T H « A WEDDELL SHETLAND^fU / I s / Halley Bav3 MINING MAU0 LAN0 ENOERBY J /SEA uk'/COATS Ld / LAND T> ANTARCTIC ••?l\W Dr^hnaya^^General Belgrano arg / V ^ M a w s o n \ MAC ROBERTSON LAND\ '■ aust \ /PENINSULA' *\4- (see map betowi jrV^ Sobldl ARG 90-w {■ — Siple USA j. Amundsen-Scott / queen MARY LAND {Mirny ELLSWORTH" LAND 1, 1 1 °Vostok ussr MARIE BYRD L LAND WILKES LAND ouiiiv_. , ROSS|NZJ Y/lnda^Z / SEA I#V/VICTORIA .TERRE , **•»./ LAND \ /"AOELIE-V Leningradskaya .V USSR,-'' \ --- — -"'BALLENYIj ANTARCTIC PENINSULA 1 Tenitnte Matianzo arg 2 Esptrarua arg 3 Almirarrta Brown arc 4PttrtlAHG 5 Otcipcion arg 6 Vtcecomodoro Marambio arg * ANTARCTICA 7 Arturo Prat chile 8 Bernardo O'Higgins chile 1000 Miles 9 Prasid«fTtB Frei chile s 1000 Kilometres 10 Stonington I.
  • Revised Records of Atmospheric Trace Gases CO2, CH4, N2O, and Δ13c

    Revised Records of Atmospheric Trace Gases CO2, CH4, N2O, and Δ13c

    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 473–492, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-473-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Revised records of atmospheric trace gases 13 CO2, CH4, N2O, and δ C-CO2 over the last 2000 years from Law Dome, Antarctica Mauro Rubino1,2, David M. Etheridge2, David P. Thornton2, Russell Howden2, Colin E. Allison2, Roger J. Francey2, Ray L. Langenfelds2, L. Paul Steele2, Cathy M. Trudinger2, Darren A. Spencer2, Mark A. J. Curran3,4, Tas D. van Ommen3,4, and Andrew M. Smith5 1School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK 2Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, 3195, Australia 3Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia 4Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 80, Hobart, Tasmania, 7005, Australia 5Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Locked Bag 2001, Kirrawee, NSW 2232, Australia Correspondence: Mauro Rubino ([email protected]) and David M. Etheridge ([email protected]) Received: 28 November 2018 – Discussion started: 14 December 2018 Revised: 12 March 2019 – Accepted: 24 March 2019 – Published: 11 April 2019 Abstract. Ice core records of the major atmospheric greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4,N2O) and their isotopo- logues covering recent centuries provide evidence of biogeochemical variations during the Late Holocene and pre-industrial periods and over the transition to the industrial period. These records come from a number of ice core and firn air sites and have been measured in several laboratories around the world and show com- mon features but also unresolved differences.
  • 2006-2007 Science Planning Summaries

    2006-2007 Science Planning Summaries

    Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2006-2007 USAP field season using the available indexes. Project Web Sites Find more information about 2006-2007 USAP projects by viewing project web sites. More Information Additional information pertaining to the 2006-2007 Field Season. Home Page Station Schedules Air Operations Staffed Field Camps Event Numbering System 2006-2007 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2006-2007 USAP field season using the USAP Program Indexes available indexes. Aeronomy and Astrophysics Dr. Bernard Lettau, Program Director (acting) Project Web Sites Biology and Medicine Dr. Roberta Marinelli, Program Director Find more information about 2006-2007 USAP projects by Geology and Geophysics viewing project web sites. Dr. Thomas Wagner, Program Director Glaciology Dr. Julie Palais, Program Director More Information Ocean and Climate Systems Additional information pertaining Dr. Bernhard Lettau, Program Director to the 2006-2007 Field Season. Artists and Writers Home Page Ms. Kim Silverman, Program Director Station Schedules USAP Station and Vessel Indexes Air Operations Staffed Field Camps Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station Event Numbering System McMurdo Station Palmer Station RVIB Nathaniel B. Palmer ARSV Laurence M. Gould Special Projects Principal Investigator Index Deploying Team Members Index Institution Index Event Number Index Technical Event Index Project Web Sites 2006-2007 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project Indexes Find information about projects approved for the 2006-2007 USAP field season using the Project Web Sites available indexes. Principal Investigator/Link Event No. Project Title Aghion, Anne W-218-M Works and days: An antarctic Project Web Sites chronicle Find more information about 2006-2007 USAP projects by Ainley, David B-031-M Adélie penguin response to viewing project web sites.
  • Appendix D : Cartographic Materials Codes

    Appendix D : Cartographic Materials Codes

    Appendix D : Cartographic Materials Codes These lists are based on Ministry of Defence Mapping and Charting Establishment practice. Field 31 - Character positions 1-4: Relief codes CODE DEFINITION a Contours b Tonal hill shading c Hypsometric tints – layer method d Hachures e Bathymetry – sounding f Form lines g Spot heights h Other methods in colour (e.g. in the style of Imhof) i Pictorial j Land forms (e.g. in the sytle of Lobeck, Raisz, Fenneman) k Bathymetry – isolines l Bathymetry – tints m Ridge lines z Other Field 031 - Character positions 5-6: Projection type codes AZIMUTHAL OR ZENITHAL CONIC PROJECTIONS PROJECTIONS aa Aitoff ca Alber’s equal area ab Gnomonic cb Bonne ac Lambert’s azimuthal equal area cc Lambert’s conformal conic ad Orthographic cd Polyconic (simple) ae Azimuthal equidistant ce Miller’s bipolar oblique conformal conic af Stereographic cf D Lisle ag Other Azimuthal equal area cg Projection of the International Map of World au Azimuthal, specific type unknown ch Tissot’s conformal conic az Azimuthal, other known specific cu Conic, specific type unknown type cz Conic, other known specific type CYLINDRICAL OTHER PROJECTIONS PROJECTIONS ba Gall da Armadillo bb Homolographic db Butterfly bc Lambert’s cylindrical equal area dd Goode’s homolosine bd Mercator df Van der Grinten be Miller’s cylindrical dg Dymaxion bf Molweide dh Cordiform bg Sinusoidal di Polyhedric bh Transverse Mercator uu Type of projection unknown bj Plate Carree zz Other known type bk Cassini’s bl Laborde bm Oblique Mercator bu Cylindrical, specific
  • Antarctic Primer

    Antarctic Primer

    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
  • THE PUBLICATION of the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY Vol 34, No

    THE PUBLICATION of the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY Vol 34, No

    THE PUBLICATION OF THE NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY Vol 34, No. 3, 2016 34, No. Vol 03 9 770003 532006 Vol 34, No. 3, 2016 Issue 237 Contents www.antarctic.org.nz is published quarterly by the New Zealand Antarctic Society Inc. ISSN 0003-5327 30 The New Zealand Antarctic Society is a Registered Charity CC27118 EDITOR: Lester Chaplow ASSISTANT EDITOR: Janet Bray New Zealand Antarctic Society PO Box 404, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand Email: [email protected] INDEXER: Mike Wing The deadlines for submissions to future issues are 1 November, 1 February, 1 May and 1 August. News 25 Shackleton’s Bad Lads 26 PATRON OF THE NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY: From Gateway City to Volunteer Duty at Scott Base 30 Professor Peter Barrett, 2008 NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY How You Can Help Us Save Sir Ed’s Antarctic Legacy 33 LIFE MEMBERS The Society recognises with life membership, First at Arrival Heights 34 those people who excel in furthering the aims and objectives of the Society or who have given outstanding service in Antarctica. They are Conservation Trophy 2016 36 elected by vote at the Annual General Meeting. The number of life members can be no more Auckland Branch Midwinter Celebration 37 than 15 at any one time. Current Life Members by the year elected: Wellington Branch – 2016 Midwinter Event 37 1. Jim Lowery (Wellington), 1982 2. Robin Ormerod (Wellington), 1996 3. Baden Norris (Canterbury), 2003 Travelling with the Huskies Through 4. Bill Cranfield (Canterbury), 2003 the Transantarctic Mountains 38 5. Randal Heke (Wellington), 2003 6. Bill Hopper (Wellington), 2004 Hillary’s TAE/IGY Hut: Calling all stories 40 7.