Introduction to Coral Reefs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Coral Reefs AGRRA: Introduction to Coral Reefs Found on “healthy” coral reefs stony corals stony corals crustose coralline reef algae fishes sparse turf algae Revision: 2016-05-24 Judith Lang Images in this presentation are Copyright © by New World Publications and by other photographers as noted. Copyright © Ocean Research & Education Foundation Permission is granted to use this Powerpoint presentation for educational purposes with the AGRRA Program and, with attribution, for other valid educational purposes. All other uses are strictly prohibited. For permission to use their images, special thanks to: L. Benvenuti, A. Bruckner, J. Bruno, K. Desai, P. Dustan, P. Edmunds, M. Gerber, E. Hickerson, H. Hudson, P. Humann, L. Ilyes, B. Kakuk, J.-P. Maréchal, R. McCall, M. Moe, H. Moody, A. Moulding, M. Nugues, J. Reichman, C. Rogers, A. St. Gelais, G. Schmahl, R. Steneck, C. van Dongen, E. Weil, L. Williams What are Coral reefs? © H. Moody “wave-resistant limestone structures built dominantly by the vertical accumulation of coral skeletons” + capped by live corals & lots of other organisms! Stony corals are the major framework constructors of coral reefs. Their soft polyps overlie stony (calcareous) skeletons. The polyps expand to feed on plankton, usually at night. © R. McCall Meandrina jacksoni Colonies are formed when the polyps divide asexually. Tentacle Mouth Skeleton Colony Single Polyp Diagram from P. Humann Diverse patterns of asexual division and growth create corals of many different shapes and sizes. © K. Marks © M.McField © R. Steneck © K. Marks fast growing acroporids slower growing massives Reef corals need flowing water, food, space on the substratum, warm temperatures–and light. Colonial corals continue to grow via asexual division (reproduction) throughout their lives. © K. Desai Porites porites and Millepora complanata Adult corals also reproduce sexually. Species that grow large engage in mass spawning of gametes once, or several times, a year. Close-up © G. Schmahl Orbicella franksi Colpophyllia natans Coral larvae need to settle on solid surfaces like dead corals or crustose coralline algae. larvae polyp © A. St. Gelais recruit juvenile © A. Moulding © A. St. Gelais Porites astreoides © R. Steneck Recruits give reefs a chance of recovering after disasters have killed adult corals. Zooxanthellae (‘zoox’) are tiny, yellow-brown algae in some cells of reef-building corals. Close-up © J. Reichman Zoox gain shelter, access to carbon dioxide for photosynthesis and inorganic wastes (= nutrients for growth) from their host coral. Clades are genetically distinct populatons of zoox that characterize certain reef habitats, and/or coral species and/or location on a coral. Zoox contribute organic compounds to their coral host (= support its health, growth, and calcification). © A. Moulding Montastraea cavernosa recruit with zoox Bleached corals are still alive! Close-up Bleaching occurs when most of the zoox are gone, and/or remain but have lost most of their yellow-brown photosynthetic pigments. Corals are not killed by temporary bleaching. Bleached Porites Bleaching occurs in response to stressors like unusually high or low temperatures, unusually high or low salinities, or too much sediment. Partially bleached Orbicella annularis Severity of bleaching varies by: • the coral’s species or colony identity • the cladal identity of its zoox • its location on the reef with respect to depth, currents, shading, etc. partially bleached not completely bleached bleached © L. Williams © K. Marks C. natans D. labyrinthiformis M. meandrites When mass bleaching occurs, sea water temperature is above warm season averages.* Polyps die and/or, at least temporarily, are more susceptible to disease and/or their future growth or sexual reproduction is reduced. Orbicella faveolata * Increases of ~1o C for ~4 weeks, or ~3-4o C for 1-2 days Major Mass Bleaching Events 1998: Bahamas and Mesoamerica 2005: Eastern and NE Caribbean 2010: Southeastern Caribbean 2016: ??? St. John U.S.V.I. 2005 © C. Rogers Orbicella annularis Corals are also killed by pathogens (biological disease causing agents). YB © E. Weil Orbicella faveolata with Yellow Band disease (YB) Large outbreaks of disease are common when corals start to “recover” from severe bleaching. WP © J.-P. Maréchal Formerly bleached Orbicella faveolata now with White Plague (WP) Corallivores (coral predators) include some invertebrates (below) and fishes. Close-up WP © A. Bruckner © J. Lang Fireworm on an Orbicella Snail feeding on a faveolata already infected with staghorn coral, White Plague (WP) Acropora cervicornis Damselfish like the threespot (Stegastes planifrons) create small lesions in live corals to cultivate algal gardens for food and to use as a nursery for their young. © P. Humann © B. Kakuk Threespot damselfish, Orbicella annularis Stegastes planifrons with threespot bites Stoplight (Sparisoma viride) and some other parrotfishes kill coral polyps and excavate their skeletons. © A. Bruckner © A. Bruckner Lesions from merged stoplight Stoplight parrotfish (S. viride) bites can be > 30 cm/12 in long! biting Orbicella annularis Partial Mortality: when parts of a coral die, the white skeleton below is exposed, superficially resembling bleaching. Close-up white skeleton = new mortality © P. Dustan Mycetophyllia with new mortality When large predators are rare, corallivores may be very common and kill many corals. © R. Steneck Black grouper, Mycteroperca bonaci Corals also compete for space with other corals, cyanobacteria, thick/dense turf algae, macroalgae, and some invertebrates. calcareous macroalgae aggressive © B. Kakuk invertebrates © B. Kakuk fleshy macroalgae cyano- coral bacteria (thick/dense) turf algae © B. Kakuk © J. Lang © P. Edmunds Feeding by Diadema antillarum (long-spined sea urchin) and large (≥ 30 cm) parrotfishes dislodges the basal holdfasts of benthic algae. © M. Moe Having been decimated by disease, Stoplight parrotfish, Diadema are now rare on many reefs. Sparisoma viride When large herbivores are rare, turf algae and macroalgae (seaweeds) may colonize dead corals, becoming so abundant that they prevent coral larvae from settling. These algae can also overgrow live corals. © J. Bruno Overfishing in the wider Caribbean has already depleted many populations of shark, large- and small-sized bony fish, queen conch and spiny lobster, simplifying natural feeding relationships (as summarized on the next slide) among reef organisms. © J. Bruno © C. van Dongen Carnivores - Corallivores - Herbivores +/- + + - Corals + + - Benthic Algae - + Modified from P.R. Kramer; © photos: A. Bruckner, R. Ken, J. Lang, K. Marks, M. Moe, J. Schulke, R. Steneck AGRRA Program Primary Goals: Rapidly assess key structural and functional attributes of tropical Western Atlantic reefs. Stony Corals And provide Benthic Algae fishery- © R. Steneck © B. Kakuk independent © L. Benvenuti estimates of fishing Herbivores Carnivores intensity. © M. Moe © R. Steneck Common AGRRA Corals by shape and size P. astreoides © R. Steneck S. siderea O. faveolata S. siderea A. palmata P. porites © R. Steneck © C. Rogers massive branching M. complanata M. decactis E. fastigiata U. agaricites © K. Marks © R. Steneck © M. Nugues © R. Steneck nodular/ flower platy/bifacial encrusting (phaceloid) Common AGRRA “Algal” Groups Close-up © K. Marks © H. Hudson © J. Lang crustose coralline algae cyanobacteria turf algae © S. Voegeli © K. Marks calcareous © K. Marks fleshy macroalgae macroalgae peyssonnelids Common AGRRA Fish Groups damselfish snapper © P. Humann parrotfish grunt surgeonfish © R. Steneck © P. Humann ©© L.L. IlyesIlyes © C. Rogers herbivores butterflyfish angelfish grouper © R. Steneck © P. Humann ornamentals © M. Gerber predators.
Recommended publications
  • Turbidity Criterion for the Protection of Coral Reef and Hardbottom Communities
    DRAFT Implementation of the Turbidity Criterion for the Protection of Coral Reef and Hardbottom Communities Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection October 2020 Contents Section 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Document .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background Information ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Criterion and Rule Language .............................................................................................. 2 1.4 Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations .......................................................................... 5 1.5 Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW) Considerations ........................................................................... 5 1.6 Natural Factors Influencing Background Turbidity Levels ................................................................ 7 Section 2. Implementation in Permitting ..................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Permitting Information ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Establishing Baseline (Pre-project) Levels ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Studies in Marine Science Reef Condition and Protection Of
    Regional Studies in Marine Science 32 (2019) 100893 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Regional Studies in Marine Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rsma Reef condition and protection of coral diversity and evolutionary history in the marine protected areas of Southeastern Dominican Republic ∗ Camilo Cortés-Useche a,b, , Aarón Israel Muñiz-Castillo a, Johanna Calle-Triviño a,b, Roshni Yathiraj c, Jesús Ernesto Arias-González a a Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Unidad Mérida B.P. 73 CORDEMEX, C.P. 97310, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico b Fundación Dominicana de Estudios Marinos FUNDEMAR, Bayahibe, Dominican Republic c ReefWatch Marine Conservation, Bandra West, Mumbai 400050, India article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Changes in structure and function of coral reefs are increasingly significant and few sites in the Received 18 February 2019 Caribbean can tolerate local and global stress factors. Therefore, we assessed coral reef condition Received in revised form 20 September 2019 indicators in reefs within and outside of MPAs in the southeastern Dominican Republic, considering Accepted 15 October 2019 benthic cover as well as the composition, diversity, recruitment, mortality, bleaching, the conservation Available online 18 October 2019 status and evolutionary distinctiveness of coral species. In general, we found that reef condition Keywords: indicators (coral and benthic cover, recruitment, bleaching, and mortality) within the MPAs showed Coral reefs better conditions than in the unprotected area (Boca Chica). Although the comparison between the Caribbean Boca Chica area and the MPAs may present some spatial imbalance, these zones were chosen for Biodiversity the purpose of making a comparison with a previous baseline presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 229/Friday, November 27, 2020/Proposed Rules
    76302 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 229 / Friday, November 27, 2020 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE required fields, and enter or attach your Background comments. We listed twenty coral species as National Oceanic and Atmospheric Instructions: You must submit threatened under the ESA effective Administration comments by the above to ensure that October 10, 2014 (79 FR 53851, we receive, document, and consider September 10, 2014). Five of the corals 50 CFR Parts 223 and 226 them. Comments sent by any other occur in the Caribbean: Orbicella [Docket No. 200918–0250] method or received after the end of the annularis, O. faveolata, O. franksi, comment period, may not be Dendrogyra cylindrus, and RIN 0648–BG26 considered. All comments received are Mycetophyllia ferox. The final listing a part of the public record and will determinations were all based on the Endangered and Threatened Species; generally be posted to http:// best scientific and commercial Critical Habitat for the Threatened www.regulations.gov without change. information available on a suite of Caribbean Corals All Personal Identifying Information (for demographic, spatial, and susceptibility example, name, address, etc.) components that influence the species’ AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries vulnerability to extinction in the face of Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and voluntarily submitted by the commenter continuing threats over the foreseeable Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), may be publicly accessible. Do not future. All of the species had undergone Commerce. submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or population declines and are susceptible ACTION: Proposed rule; request for protected information. to multiple threats, including: Ocean comments. NMFS will accept anonymous warming, diseases, ocean acidification, ecological effects of fishing, and land- SUMMARY: We, NMFS, propose to comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required based sources of pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Supplementary Material SM1. Post-Processing of Images for Automated Classification Imagery was collected without artificial light and using a fisheye lens to maximise light capture, therefore each image needed to be processed prior annotation in order to balance colour and to minimise the non-linear distortion introduced by the fisheye lens (Figure S1). Initially, colour balance and lenses distortion correction were manually applied on the raw images using Photoshop (Adobe Systems, California, USA). However, in order to optimize the manual post-processing time of thousands of images, more recent images from the Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean were post- processed using compressed images (jpeg format) and an automatic batch processing in Photoshop and ImageMagick, the latter an open-source software for image processing (www.imagemagick.org). In view of this, the performance of the automated image annotation on images without colour balance was contrasted against images colour balanced using manual post-processing (on raw images) and the automatic batch processing (on jpeg images). For this evaluation, the error metric described in the main text (Materials and Methods) was applied to the images from following regions: the Maldives and the Great Barrier Reef (Figures S2 and S3). We found that the colour balance applied regardless the type of processing (manual vs automatic) had an important beneficial effect on the performance of the automated image annotation as errors were reduced for critical labels in both regions (e.g., Algae labels; Figures S2 and S3). Importantly, no major differences in the performance of the automated annotations were observed between manual and automated adjustments for colour balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys…
    What Do We Know? • Florida Keys… − Stony coral benthic cover declined by 40% from 1996 – 2009 (Ruzicka et al. 2013). − Potential Driving Factor? Stress due to extreme cold & warm water temperatures − Stony coral communities in patch reefs remained relatively constant after the 1998 El Niño (Ruzicka et al. 2013). − Patch reefs exposed to moderate SST Carysfort Reef - Images from Gene Shinn - USGS Photo Gallery variability exhibited the highest % live coral cover (Soto et al. 2011). Objective To test if the differences in stony coral diversity on Florida Keys reefs were correlated with habitats or SST variability from 1996 - 2010. Methods: Coral Reef Evaluation & Monitoring Program (CREMP) % coral cover 43 species DRY TORTUGAS UPPER KEYS MIDDLE KEYS LOWER KEYS 36 CREMP STATIONS (Patch Reefs (11), Offshore Shallow (12), Offshore Deep (13)) Methods: Sea Surface Temperature (SST) • Annual SST variance were derived from weekly means. • Categories for SST variability (variance): • Low (<7.0°C2) • Intermediate (7.0 - 10.9°C2) • High (≥11.0°C2) Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) SST data Vega-Rodriguez M et al. (2015) Results 1 I 0.5 Acropora palmata I s i Millepora complanata x Multivariate Statistics A l a Acropora c i Agaricia agaricites n o Pseudodiploriarevealed clivosa cervicornisthat stonycomplex n a C 0 Porites astreoides Madracis auretenra h t i coral diversity varied w Diploria labyrinthiformis Agaricia lamarcki n o Siderastrea radians i t Porites porites a l e significantly with r r Orbicella annularis o C -0.5 Pseudodiploriahabitats strigosa Colpophyllia natansStephanocoenia intercepta Montastraea cavernosa Siderastrea siderea Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) -1 0.6 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 Correlation with Canonical Axis I ) % 0.4 7 6 .
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the 2005 Coral Bleaching Event on Porites Porites and Colpophyllia Natans at Tektite Reef, US Virgin Islands
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Coral Reefs (2007) 26:689–693 DOI 10.1007/s00338-007-0241-y NOTE Impact of the 2005 coral bleaching event on Porites porites and Colpophyllia natans at Tektite Reef, US Virgin Islands K. R. T. Whelan · J. Miller · O. Sanchez · M. Patterson Received: 7 August 2006 / Accepted: 19 April 2007 / Published online: 6 June 2007 © Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract A thermal stress anomaly in 2005 caused mass Introduction coral bleaching at a number of north-east Caribbean reefs. The impact of the thermal stress event and subsequent Coral bleaching occurs when coral polyps loose pigment or White-plague disease type II on Porites porites and Colpo- expel zooxanthellae due to physiological stress, which phyllia natans was monitored using a time series of photo- recently has been most-often related to high water tempera- graphs from Tektite Reef, Virgin Islands National Park, tures and high solar radiation (Brown 1997; Winter et al. St. John. Over 92% of the P. porites and 96% of the 1998; Santavy et al. 2005). Since the 1980s, reports of coral C. natans experienced extensive bleaching (>30% of col- bleaching in the Caribbean have increased, with major ony bleached). During the study, 56% of P. porites and Caribbean-wide bleaching occurring in 1997–1998 (Hoegh- 42% of C. natans experienced whole-colony mortality Guldberg 1999; Aronson et al. 2000; Gardner et al. 2003). within the sample plots. While all whole-colony mortality Approximately 43–47% of coral tissue bleached at two St of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudosiderastrea Formosa Sp. Nov. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia)
    Zoological Studies 51(1): 93-98 (2012) Pseudosiderastrea formosa sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia) a New Coral Species Endemic to Taiwan Michel Pichon1, Yao-Yang Chuang2,3, and Chaolun Allen Chen2,3,4,* 1Museum of Tropical Queensland, 70-102 Flinders Street, Townsville 4810, Australia 2Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Nangang, Taipei 115, Taiwan 3Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 106, Taiwan 4Institute of Life Science, National Taitung Univ., Taitung 904, Taiwan (Accepted September 1, 2011) Michel Pichon, Yao-Yang Chuang, and Chaolun Allen Chen (2012) Pseudosiderastrea formosa sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia) a new coral species endemic to Taiwan. Zoological Studies 51(1): 93-98. Pseudosiderastrea formosa sp. nov. is a new siderastreid scleractinian coral collected in several localities in Taiwan. It lives on rocky substrates where it forms encrusting colonies. Results of morphological observations and molecular genetic analyses are presented. The new species is described and compared to P. tayamai and Siderastrea savignyana, and its morphological and phylogenic affinities are discussed. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/51.1/93.pdf Key words: Pseudosiderastrea formosa sp. nov., New species, Scleractinia, Siderastreid, Western Pacific Ocean. A siderastreid scleractinian coral was Pseudosiderastrea, described as P. formosa sp. collected from several localities around Taiwan nov. and nearby islands, where it is relatively rare. The specimens present some morphological similarities with Pseudosiderastrea tayamai Yabe MATERIAL AND METHODS and Sugiyama, 1935, the only species hitherto known from that genus, and with Siderastrea Specimens were collected by scuba diving at savignyana Milne Edwards and Haime, 1849, Wanlitung (21°59'48"N, 120°42'10"E) and the outlet which is the sole representative in the Indian of the 3rd nuclear power plant (21°55'51.38"N, Ocean of the genus Siderastrea de Blainville, 120°44'46.82"E) on the southeastern coast 1830.
    [Show full text]
  • GIGA III Draft Program 12 October 2018
    Third Global Invertebrate Genomics Alliance Research Conference and Workshop (GIGA III) PROGRAM October 19-21, 2018 Curaçao Welcome to GIGA III Sponsored by: The organizing committee welcomes all of the enthusiastic attendees to the stunningly beautiful island of Curaçao for GIGA III. This is the third official conference for the Global Invertebrate Genomics Alliance, informally known as GIGA. Following our first meeting at Nova Southeastern University in Dania Beach, and our second meeting at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, we are witnessing increasing interest in and growth of our group and its collective research. Thank you for attending and helping to focus on the latest achievements. GIGA I laid the ground work, defining the purpose for gathering “a grassroots community of scientists”. GIGA II reinforced the GIGA goals outlined in the first white paper, published in the Journal of Heredity, and also expanded the scope of GIGA to fully consider transcriptomes, open access data repositories, and the logistics of sample collecting and permitting. These were presented in a second white paper. At GIGA III, we continue along this track, as the primary mission remains the same – to promote genomic studies of invertebrate animals. In this context, special symposia on conservation genomics, phylogenomics, and existing and emerging genomic technologies have been organized, attracting many interesting talks. To highlight the broad scope of invertebrate genomics, we have also had the good fortune to bring in three highly respected keynote speakers (Federico Brown, Joie Cannon, and Mónica Medina) to discuss the field from their own unique research perspectives and experiences. i In addition, we have now hardwired the original charge by providing limited yet intensive practical bioinformatics workshops, which begin on day two.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School Eberly College of Science
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Eberly College of Science COMPLEMENTARITY IN THE CORAL HOLOBIONT: A GENOMIC ANALYSIS OF BACTERIAL ISOLATES OF ORBICELLA FAVEOLATA AND SYMBIODINIUM SPP. A Thesis in Biology by Styles M. Smith ©2018 Styles M. Smith Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2018 The thesis of Styles M. Smith was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mónica Medina Associate Professor of Biology Thesis Advisor Steven W. Schaeffer Professor of Biology Head of Graduate Program Kevin L. Hockett Assistant Professor of Microbial Ecology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii Abstract All holobionts, defined as a multicellular host and all of its associated microorganisms, rely on interactions between its members. Corals, which demonstrate a strong symbiosis with an algal partner, have a diverse holobiont that can be sequenced and analyzed that could reveal important roles of microbes that benefit its health. This microbial community has been predicted to be composed of nitrogen fixers, phototrophs, sulfur and phosphorus cyclers. However, the identity of these microbes responsible for these roles remain uncertain. In addition, there may be complementary roles that are unknown. Predicting these roles is challenging because…. A suggested method to overcome this problem is sequencing the genomes of the microbes found in the coral holobiont. I hypothesize that bacterial members of the holobiont play an important role in coral biology via complementary metabolisms in nutrient cycling and aiding the coral in stress response. The complete metabolic capabilities of ten bacteria isolated from the coral holobiont were examined via the sequencing and annotation of the whole genome, followed by pangenomic analysis with 31 whole genomes of closely related strains of bacteria previously sequenced.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Two Intervention Methods for Stony Coral
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Assessing the efectiveness of two intervention methods for stony coral tissue loss disease on Montastraea cavernosa Erin N. Shilling 1*, Ian R. Combs 1,2 & Joshua D. Voss 1* Stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) was frst observed in Florida in 2014 and has since spread to multiple coral reefs across the wider Caribbean. The northern section of Florida’s Coral Reef has been heavily impacted by this outbreak, with some reefs experiencing as much as a 60% loss of living coral tissue area. We experimentally assessed the efectiveness of two intervention treatments on SCTLD-afected Montastraea cavernosa colonies in situ. Colonies were tagged and divided into three treatment groups: (1) chlorinated epoxy, (2) amoxicillin combined with CoreRx/Ocean Alchemists Base 2B, and (3) untreated controls. The experimental colonies were monitored periodically over 11 months to assess treatment efectiveness by tracking lesion development and overall disease status. The Base 2B plus amoxicillin treatment had a 95% success rate at healing individual disease lesions but did not necessarily prevent treated colonies from developing new lesions over time. Chlorinated epoxy treatments were not signifcantly diferent from untreated control colonies, suggesting that chlorinated epoxy treatments are an inefective intervention technique for SCTLD. The results of this experiment expand management options during coral disease outbreaks and contribute to overall knowledge regarding coral health and disease. Coral reefs face many threats, including, but not limited to, warming ocean temperatures, overfshing, increased nutrient and plastic pollution, hurricanes, ocean acidifcation, and disease outbreaks 1–6. Coral diseases are com- plex, involving both pathogenic agents and coral immune responses.
    [Show full text]