DOCSLIB.ORG

The Earth Observer, March

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Earth Observer, March National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Earth Observer. March - April 2011. Volume 23, Issue 2. Editor’s Corner Steve Platnick obser ervth EOS Senior Project Scientist There is a lot to report since our last issue, and I regret that little of it is good news. As I expect most of you are already aware, NASA’s Glory spacecraft failed to reach orbit after being launched on an Orbital Sciences Corporation Taurus XL rocket from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on March 4, 2011. About three minutes after the 5:09 AM EST launch, telemetry indicated that the fairing—the protec- tive shell atop the rocket—did not separate as expected and the spacecraft likely fell into the South Pacific. This comes just two years after a similar failure mode occurred for the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO)—also launched on a Taurus XL. There was an extensive investigation following that February 2009 failure; the fair- ing underwent a redesign of its separation system and had been cleared for use for the Glory mission. A mishap investigation board has been selected to analyze the Glory launch failure and make recommendations to the NASA administrator. continued on page 2 On December 11, 2010, the Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) on the Orb- view-2 satellite [pictured right] ceased trans- mitting data after a distinguished 13-year life. Shown here is a composite image showing chlo- rophyll concentrations over the ocean and Nor- malized Difference Vegetation Index over land over the course of the SeaWiFS data record. Image Credit: SeaWiFS Project [NASA God- dard Space Flight Center] and GeoEye the ear SeaWiFS Global Biosphere September 1997–December 2010 www.nasa.gov 02 The Earth Observer March - April 2011 Volume 23, Issue 2 This is an extremely disappointing setback for NASA’s eos.nasa.gov Earth Science program, and of course all those directly involved in the Glory mission. With the Aerosol Polar- In This Issue imetry Sensor (APS) instrument, Glory was to obtain unique polarimetric observations of reflected solar ra- diation that would help quantify the role of aerosols in Editor’s Corner Front Cover climate. The mission would also have continued our ongoing measurements of the Total Solar Irradiance Feature Articles with an improved Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) instrument that was first flown on the SORCE mis- The Enduring Legacy of the Earth sion. In addition to working to determine the cause of Observing System Part I: Forging the launch vehicle failure, NASA’s Earth Science Divi- An “EOS Community” 4 sion is conducting parallel studies to determine first Let It Snow, Let It Snow…Let Us Know! 12 if a rapid reflight of an APS-2 instrument would be NASA Supports UNESCO Kickoff a scientifically viable and valuable mission today, and for International Year of Chemistry 16 second, what would be the minimum cost, risk, and The Evolution of the ESIP Federation 18 schedule implementation approach that could com- NASA DEVELOP Students at the plete such a mission. Mobile County Health Department editor's corner Utilize Earth Observations to On February 14, President Obama’s FY12 budget was Address Public Health Issues in the released. The new budget proposal contains both good Gulf Coast Region 22 and bad news for NASA Earth Science. The perceived balance between the two depends on one’s inclination Meeting/Workshop Summaries to see a glass as half full or half empty, and recognition of the current U.S. budget environment. Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting 26 For clarity, it’s easier to start with the bad news. NA- 38th ASTER Science Team SA’s overall spending would be frozen at $18.7 billion Meeting Report 31 (B). Earth Science would remain flat at about $1.8B Land Atmospheres Near-real time through at least 2016, representing a removal of $1.24B Capability for EOS (LANCE) User from the $2.08B increase proposed in the president’s Working Group Meeting Summary 35 FY11 budget for the years FY12-15. The result of those GRACE Science Team Meeting Summary 39 cuts is that funding for further development of two Tier In The News 1 Decadal Survey missions—Climate Absolute Radi- ance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) and Seeking Feedback and Improvement, Deformation, Ecosystem Structure and Dynamics of NASA's Earth Data System Ice (DESDynI)—will be eliminated. The multiyear Earns Praise 42 budget plan NASA sent Congress a year ago called for JPL Airborne Sensor to Study spending $1.2 billion from 2012–2015 to develop these 'Rivers in the Sky' 44 two missions. Both had recently completed their Mis- Cleaning the Air Would Limit sion Concept Reviews (MCRs) and were expected to Short-Term Climate Warming 46 proceed to Phase A—as reported in the last issue’s edito- rial. However, the Office of Management and Budget Regular Features (OMB) specifically removed those funds from its 2012 budget proposal. Further, NASA was directed to stop EOS Scientists in the News 48 work on the second GPM Microwave Imager (GMI #2) NASA Science Mission Directorate— instrument, that NASA had been building while look- Science Education Update 50 ing for an international partner to complete the GPM Science Calendars 51 Low Inclination Orbiter (GPM-LIO) mission. Reminder: To view the images in this newsletter in color, visit: eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/eos_homepage/for_scientists/earth_ob- More specifically, all funding for CLARREO and DES- server.php DynI for FY12–FY16 was removed from the NASA budget. For CLARREO, NASA has been directed to hold the mission in preformulation through FY16. The first year of the recently awarded CLARREO Science The Earth Observer March - April 2011 Volume 23, Issue 2 03 Definition Team will be funded. The DESDynI lidar is for a more tenacious little spacecraft and instrument that cancelled, and NASA was directed to find an interna- has served us so well for the past 13+ years. Not bad for a tional partner to contribute a space-based lidar mission. spacecraft and mission that so many people thought would NASA was directed to look for affordable alternatives to never get off the ground let alone make it through the pro- the DESDynI radar, though no funds were provided to jected five-year mission life.” do so. The DESDynI Science Team solicitation may be revised with a delayed release. For both CLARREO and SeaWiFS was NASA’s first data-buy—meaning that in- DESDynI, support commensurate with a mission in stead of NASA designing, building, and operating the early pre-formulation is expected to continue. instrument and spacecraft, NASA defined the data and mission specifications and we purchased the data from Now, the good news. With the exception of the individ- a private company. The data have been distributed far ual missions or mission elements above, the president’s and wide, and in the minds of many people, have revo- FY12 budget fully funds all other requested Earth Sci- lutionized the way we view our world. Since its launch ence Division flight activities. The overall budget se- in August 1997, the SeaWiFS project has distributed cures funding for the other two Tier 1 Earth Science nearly 20-million data files, has over 3500 authorized missions identified in the 2007 Decadal Survey—Soil SeaWiFS researchers, has an international collaboration Moisture Active-Passive (SMAP) and ICESat-2. The of 132 ground receiving stations, and has been the basis missions remain budgeted for launch in 2014 and for more than 2600 peer-reviewed science papers. Says 2016, respectively; both are currently in Phase A of their Feldman, “I have no doubt that this data set will continue development. The budget also continues to support the to provide new discoveries and insights into the workings of editor's corner so-called foundational missions currently in the imple- this incredible planet that we call home.” mentation phase (Aquarius, NPP, LDCM, GPM Core Observatory) and climate missions (SAGE-III, OCO- Our periodic Perspectives on EOS series returns this is- 2/-3, GRACE-FO, PACE). The current operating mis- sue with the first of two planned articles from Ghassem sions, all of which submitted mission-continuation ”Se- Asrar on page 4. In these articles, we have been shar- nior Review” proposals on March 4, are funded in the ing reflections on EOS from those who participated President’s budget (a graphical timeline of recent past, in its development. In addition to providing historical operating, and future Earth Science missions is available information, the hope is that these articles and lessons- at eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/eos_homepage/mission_profiles/docs/ learned might help inform those tasked with planning mission_profile.pdf). Further, the Earth Venture-class so- future Earth observing missions. Asrar actively partici- licitations and funding continue as planned, including pated in EOS (as a Science Program Manager, Program the release of the EV-2 small mission Announcement of Scientist, and Associate Administrator), and brings Opportunity (AO) in Spring 2011, and the EV-Instru- us recollections from those days at NASA as well as a ment facility mission AO expected to be released before unique perspective on EOS and how it fits into our the end of FY11. overall Earth observing capabilities. Asrar’s article will appear in two parts. Part I focuses on the efforts that Given the challenging federal budget environment, con- went into “Forging an EOS Community”; Part II (slated tinued support of these missions signifies the adminis- for our May–June issue) will focus on both the chal- tration’s strong belief in the importance of NASA’s Earth lenges of incorporating new technology into the EOS Science efforts. But a caveat is warranted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thor's Legions American Meteorological Society Historical Monograph Series the History of Meteorology: to 1800, by H
    Thor's Legions American Meteorological Society Historical Monograph Series The History of Meteorology: to 1800, by H. Howard Frisinger (1977/1983) The Thermal Theory of Cyclones: A History of Meteorological Thought in the Nineteenth Century, by Gisela Kutzbach (1979) The History of American Weather (four volumes), by David M. Ludlum Early American Hurricanes - 1492-1870 (1963) Early American Tornadoes - 1586-1870 (1970) Early American Winters I - 1604-1820 (1966) Early American Winters II - 1821-1870 (1967) The Atmosphere - A Challenge: The Science of Jule Gregory Charney, edited by Richard S. Lindzen, Edward N. Lorenz, and George W Platzman (1990) Thor's Legions: Weather Support to the u.s. Air Force and Army - 1937-1987, by John F. Fuller (1990) Thor's Legions Weather Support to the U.S. Air Force and Army 1937-1987 John F. Fuller American Meteorological Society 45 Beacon Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108-3693 The views expressed in this book are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States Government. © Copyright 1990 by the American Meteorological Society. Permission to use figures, tables, and briefexcerpts from this monograph in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided the source is acknowledged. All rights reserved. No part ofthis publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, elec­ tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permis­ sion ofthe publisher. ISBN 978-0-933876-88-0 ISBN 978-1-935704-14-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-935704-14-0 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1990 Library of Congress catalog card number 90-81187 Published by the American Meteorological Society, 45 Beacon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108-3693 Richard E.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Louis Uccellini Assistant Administrator for Weather Services and Director of the National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S
    Dr. Louis Uccellini Assistant Administrator for Weather Services and Director of the National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Testimony to the Environment Subcommittee of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology United States House of Representatives Field Hearing: Weathering the Storm: Improving Hurricane Resiliency through Research July 22, 2019 Good morning Chairwoman Fletcher, Ranking Member Marshall, and Members of the Subcommittee. I am Dr. Louis Uccellini, Director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Weather Service (NWS). Within the NWS, NOAA’s National Hurricane Center (NHC) issues the official forecast for all Atlantic and eastern Pacific tropical cyclones (hurricanes, tropical storms and tropical depressions) and their precursors. It is my honor to testify before you today on the state of the United States hurricane forecasting capability; our efforts to improve our understanding and prediction of hurricane impacts from storm surge, heavy precipitation, and high winds; and what hurricane research focus areas are needed to improve prediction. I come before you today to report that hurricane forecasting accuracy has improved tremendously over the past two decades. The NHC track (storm location) forecast errors have decreased every decade since forecast accuracy records were established in the 1960’s, and NHC has set new records almost every year. For perspective, the average two-day Atlantic forecast location error was reduced from around 300 miles (approximately 260 nautical miles (n mi), see Fig. 1) in the 1960s to near 85 miles in the 2010s. The five-day forecast for storm location is now better than the day-and-a-half forecast was in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Hurricane Database Uncertainty and Presentation of a New Database Format
    3576 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 141 Atlantic Hurricane Database Uncertainty and Presentation of a New Database Format CHRISTOPHER W. LANDSEA AND JAMES L. FRANKLIN NOAA/NWS/NCEP/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 4 September 2012, in final form 31 December 2012) ABSTRACT ‘‘Best tracks’’ are National Hurricane Center (NHC) poststorm analyses of the intensity, central pressure, position, and size of Atlantic and eastern North Pacific basin tropical and subtropical cyclones. This paper estimates the uncertainty (average error) for Atlantic basin best track parameters through a survey of the NHC Hurricane Specialists who maintain and update the Atlantic hurricane database. A comparison is then made with a survey conducted over a decade ago to qualitatively assess changes in the uncertainties. Finally, the implications of the uncertainty estimates for NHC analysis and forecast products as well as for the pre- diction goals of the Hurricane Forecast Improvement Program are discussed. 1. Introduction and compares the survey results to independently de- rived estimates from Torn and Snyder (2012). A similar ‘‘Best tracks’’ are National Hurricane Center (NHC) survey conducted in 1999 provides some insight into poststorm analyses of the intensity, central pressure, changes in dataset quality during the last decade. Fi- position, and size of tropical and subtropical cyclones nally, we discuss implications of the uncertainty esti- (Jarvinen et al. 1984), and represent the official histori- mates for NHC analysis/forecast products, as well as cal record for each storm. These analyses (apart from for the predictability goals of the Hurricane Forecast those for size) make up the database known as the hur- Improvement Program (Gall et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the NASA Fourth Convection and Moisture Experiment
    OverviewOverview ofof thethe NASANASA FourthFourth CConvectiononvection AAndnd MMoistureoisture ExExperimentperiment Ramesh Kakar, Program Scientist Earth Science Enterprise NASA Headquarters Robbie Hood, Lead Mission Scientist NASA / Marshall Space Flight Center MainMain ResearchResearch IssuesIssues SupportingSupporting thethe NASANASA EarthEarth ScienceScience EnterpriseEnterprise • Is the global water cycle through the atmosphere accelerating? • How are variations in local weather, precipitation and water resources related to global climate change? • How well can weather forecasting be improved by new global observations and advances in satellite data assimilation? SpecificSpecific TropicalTropical CycloneCyclone ResearchResearch TopicsTopics • Observation and modeling of processes related to rapid intensification of tropical cyclones • Observation and modeling of storm movement • Improving remote sensing techniques to observe wind, temperature, and moisture in tropical cyclones and their environment • Enhanced understanding of tropical convective system structure and dynamics • Improved understanding of scale interactions between intense convection and mesoscale systems TheThe FourthFourth CConvectiononvection AAndnd MMoistureoisture EXEXperimentperiment • Science Team – 29 Principal Investigators from 5 NASA Centers, 10 universities, and 2 other governmental agencies – Collaborative partners with NOAA, United States Weather Research Program, and Air Force Reserve 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron • Field Operations – Conducted
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Hurrican Wind Vector Retrieval Algorithm Using Sea Winds Scatterometer
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2009 An Improved Hurrican Wind Vector Retrieval Algorithm Using Sea Winds Scatterometer Peth Laupattarakasem University of Central Florida Part of the Electrical and Electronics Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Laupattarakasem, Peth, "An Improved Hurrican Wind Vector Retrieval Algorithm Using Sea Winds Scatterometer" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4009. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4009 AN IMPROVED HURRICANE WIND VECTOR RETRIEVAL ALGORITHM USING SEAWINDS SCATTEROMETER by PETH LAUPATTARAKASEM M.S. Florida Atlantic University, 2003 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2009 Major Professor: W. Linwood Jones © 2009 Peth Laupattarakasem ii ABSTRACT Over the last three decades, microwave remote sensing has played a significant role in ocean surface wind measurement, and several scatterometer missions have flown in space since early 1990’s. Although they have been extremely successful for measuring ocean surface winds with high accuracy for the vast majority of marine weather conditions, unfortunately, the conventional scatterometer cannot measure extreme winds condition such as hurricane.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 National Winter Season Operations Plan
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH National Winter Season Operations Plan FCM-P13-2020 Lorem ipsum Washington, DC July 2020 Cover Image: AR Recon tracks (AFRC/53 WRS WC-130J aircraft) from 24 February 2019 on GOES-17 water vapor imagery (warm colors delineate dry air and white/green colors delineate cold clouds). White and brown icons indicate dropsondes. The red arrow indicates the AR axis. FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH 1325 East-West Highway, SSMC2 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-628-0112 NATIONAL WINTER SEASON OPERATIONS PLAN FCM-P13-2020 Washington, D.C. July 31, 2020 Change and Review Log Use this page to record changes and notices of reviews. Change Page Date| Initial Number Numbers Posted 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Review Comments Initial Date iv Foreword The purpose of the National Winter Season Operations Plan (NWSOP) is to coordinate the efforts of the Federal meteorological community to provide enhanced weather observations of severe Winter Storms impacting the coastal regions of the United States. This plan focuses on the coordination of requirements for winter season reconnaissance observations provided by the Air Force Reserve Command's (AFRC) 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron (53 WRS) and NOAA's Aircraft Operations Center (AOC). The goal is to improve the accuracy and timeliness of severe winter storm forecasts and warning services provided by the Nation's weather service organizations. These forecast and warning responsibilities are shared by the National Weather Service (NWS), within the Department of Commerce (DOC) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); and the weather services of the United States Air Force (USAF) and the United States Navy (USN) , within the Department of Defense (DOD).
    [Show full text]
  • National Winter Season Operations Plan
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH National Winter Season Operations Plan FCM-P13-2019 Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Washington, DC June 2019 Image of 2018 winter storm courtesy of NOAA FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH 1325 East-West Highway, SSMC2 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-628-0112 NATIONAL WINTER SEASON OPERATIONS PLAN FCM-P13-2019 Washington, D.C. June 2019 Image of 2018 winter storm courtesy of NOAA CHANGE AND REVIEW LOG Use this page to record changes and notices of reviews. Change Page Date| Initial Number Numbers Posted 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Review Comments Initial Date iv FOREWORD The purpose of the National Winter Seasons Operations Plan (NWSOP) is to coordinate the efforts of the Federal meteorological community to provide enhanced weather observations of severe Winter Storms impacting the coastal regions of the United States. This plan focuses on the coordination of requirements for Winter Season reconnaissance observations provided by the Air Force Reserve Command's (AFRC) 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron (53 WRS) and NOAA's Aircraft Operations Center (AOC). The goal is to improve the accuracy and timeliness of severe Winter Storm forecasts and warning services provided by the Nation's weather service organizations. These forecast and warning responsibilities are shared by the National Weather Service (NWS), within the Department of Commerce (DOC) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); and the weather services of the United States Air Force (USAF) and the United States Navy (USN) , within the Department of Defense (DOD).
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Forecast Challenges and Development of Atmospheric River Reconnaissance F
    Article West Coast Forecast Challenges and Development of Atmospheric River Reconnaissance F. Martin Ralph, Forest Cannon, Vijay Tallapragada, Christopher A. Davis, James D. Doyle, Florian Pappenberger, Aneesh Subramanian, Anna M. Wilson, David A. Lavers, Carolyn A. Reynolds, Jennifer S. Haase, Luca Centurioni, Bruce Ingleby, Jonathan J. Rutz, Jason M. Cordeira, Minghua Zheng, Chad Hecht, Brian Kawzenuk, and Luca Delle Monache ABSTRACT: Water management and flood control are major challenges in the western United States. They are heavily influenced by atmospheric river (AR) storms that produce both beneficial water supply and hazards; for example, 84% of all flood damages in the West (up to 99% in key areas) are associated with ARs. However, AR landfall forecast position errors can exceed 200 km at even 1-day lead time and yet many watersheds are <100 km across, which contributes to issues such as the 2017 Oroville Dam spillway incident and regularly to large flood forecast errors. Combined with the rise of wildfires and deadly post-wildfire debris flows, such as Montecito (2018), the need for better AR forecasts is urgent. Atmospheric River Reconnaissance (AR Recon) was developed as a research and operations partnership to address these needs. It combines new observations, modeling, data assimilation, and forecast verification methods to improve the science and predictions of landfalling ARs. ARs over the northeast Pacific are measured using dropsondes from up to three aircraft simultaneously. Additionally, airborne radio occultation is being tested, and drifting buoys with pressure sensors are deployed. AR targeting and data collection methods have been developed, assimilation and forecast impact experiments are ongoing, and better understanding of AR dynamics is emerging.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Weather, Our Heritage 1937-2012.” AFWA Agreed to This Approach in December 2009
    AIR FORCE WEATHER OUR HERITAGE 1937 TO 2012 “DIRECTORATE OF WEATHER” Jul 1937 - 1950 May 1958 - 1978 Apr 1991 - Present Air Weather Service Air Force Weather Agency 14 Apr 1943 - 15 Oct 1997 15 Oct 1997 - Present Air Force, Reserve, & Guard Component Weather Units 1 Oct 1991 to Present “MEETING THE CHALLENGE FOR 75 YEARS” TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE FRONTISPIECE ………….…………………………………………ii SIGNATURE TITLE PAGE ………………………………………..iii DEDICATION……………………………………………………...iv TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………….…xii SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LETTER…………………………..…xv FOREWARD……………………………………………………...xvi PREFACE..…………………………………………………..…..xvii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…...…………………………………....xix CHAPTER 1—The Roots and Lineage of Air Force Weather……1-1 CHAPTER 2—Chronology1937 – 1946……………………………2-1 CHAPTER 3—Chronology 1947 – 1956……………………….…..3-1 CHAPTER 4—Chronology 1957 – 1966……………………….…..4-1 CHAPTER 5—Chronology 1967 – 1976……………………..…….5-1 CHAPTER 6—Chronology 1977 – 1986………………………..….6-1 CHAPTER 7—Chronology 1987 – 1996……………………….…..7-1 CHAPTER 8—Chronology 1997 – 2006……………………….…..8-1 CHAPTER 9—Chronology 2007 – 2012………………………..….9-1 CHAPTER 10—Air Force Weather Leadership and Staff……....10-1 USAF Directorates of Weather……………………………………10-1 xii Major Air Command Weather Functional Managers……………..10- 32 Air Weather Service Commanders…………………………..…...10- 34 Air Force Weather Agency Commanders………………………...10- 51 USAF Directorate of Weather Staff…………………………...…10- 68 Air Weather Service Staff…………………………………….…10- 71 Air Force Weather Agency Staff………………………………....10- 77 CHAPTER 11—Air Force
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Weather Enterprise: Fiscal Year 2020 Budget and Coordination Report
    :Fiscal Year 2018 THE FEDERAL WEATHER ENTERPRISE Fiscal Year 2020 Budget and Coordination Report i Interdepartmental Committee for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research Working Group for the Budget and Coordination Report Chair Michael Bonadonna Executive Secretary Anthony Ramirez Office of Management and Budget Michael Clark Department of Agriculture Mark Brusberg Department of Commerce/NOAA NOAA Budget Office Julia Wolff National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service Jessica Kane National Ocean Service Christopher DiVeglio National Weather Service Laura Glockner Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Elliot Forest Office of Marine and Aviation Operations Dana Flowerlake Department of Defense Office of the Undersecretary/R&E Benjamin Petro U.S. Air Force Col Michael Gremillion U.S. Navy CDR Jillene Bushnell U.S. Army William Spendley Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Steven Goldstein (NOAA Liaison) U.S. Coast Guard Jonathan Berkson Department of Interior U.S. Geological Service Robert Mason National Park Service John Vimont Bureau of Land Management Joseph Majewski Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Angel McCoy Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Everette Whitfield Federal Highway Administration Roemer Alfelor Environmental Protection Agency Rohit Mathur National Aeronautics and Space Administration Tsengdar Lee Nuclear Regulatory Commission Cynthia Jones Department of Energy Office of Science Rickey Petty National Nuclear Security Administration
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Use of Radio Spectrum for Meteorology: Weather, Water
    ITU-R Internati onal Handbook on Telecommunicati on Union Place des Nati ons Use of Radio Spectrum for Meteorology: 1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Weather, Water and Climate Monitoring and ISBN 978-92-61-24881-9 SAP id Prediction 4 1 4 2 2 Editi on of 2017 9 7 8 9 2 6 1 2 4 8 8 1 9 Printed in Switzerland Geneva, 2017 Photo credits: Shutt erstock HANDBOOK Use of Radio Spectrum for Meteorology: Weather, Water and Climate Monitoring and Prediction Edition of 2017 Radiocommunication Bureau W orld Meteorological Organization WMO-ITU 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. Use of Radio Spectrum for Meteorology: Weather, Water and Climate Monitoring and Prediction iii PREFACE “Climate change threatens to have a catastrophic impact on ecosystems and the future prosperity, security and well-being of all humankind. The potential consequences extend to virtually all aspects of sustainable development- from food, energy and water security to broader economic and political stability” António Guterres, UN Secretary-General WMO - World Meteorological Congress ITU World Radiocommunication Conference (Geneva, 2015), in Resolution 29 (Cg-17): (Geneva, 2012), in Resolution 673 (WRC-12): Considering: “considering The prime importance of the specific … radiocommunication services for b) that Earth observation data are also meteorological and related environmental essential for monitoring and predicting climate activities required for the detection and early
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Plan for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research, FY2016
    The Federal Plan for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research Fiscal Year 2016 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH OFCMA Half-Century of Multi-Agency Collaboration FCM-P1-2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration THE FEDERAL COMMITTEE FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH (FCMSSR) DR. KATHRYN SULLIVAN MR. BENJAMIN PAGE (Observer) Chair, Department of Commerce Office of Management and Budget DR. TAMARA DICKINSON MR. EDWARD L. BOLTON, JR. Office of Science and Technology Policy Department of Transportation DR. SETH MEYER MR. DAVID L. MILLER Department of Agriculture Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Homeland Security MR. MANSON K. BROWN Department of Commerce MR. JOHN GRUNSFELD National Aeronautics and Space Administration MR. EARL WYATT Department of Defense DR. ROGER WAKIMOTO National Science Foundation DR. GERALD GEERNAERT Department of Energy MR. PAUL MISENCIK National Transportation Safety Board DR. REGINALD BROTHERS Science and Technology Directorate MR. GLENN TRACY Department of Homeland Security U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission DR. JERAD BALES DR. JENNIFER ORME-ZAVALETA Department of the Interior Environmental Protection Agency MR. KENNETH HODGKINS COL PAUL ROELLE (Acting) Department of State Federal Coordinator for Meteorology MR. MICHAEL BONADONNA, Secretariat Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH (ICMSSR) COL PAUL ROELLE, Chair (Acting) MR. RICKEY PETTY DR. DAVID R. REIDMILLER Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Department of Energy Department of State MR. MARK BRUSBERG DR. VAUGHN STANDLEY DR. ROHIT MATHUR Department of Agriculture Department of Energy Environmental Protection Agency DR. LOUIS UCCELLINI MR.
    [Show full text]