DOCSLIB.ORG

Intelligent Transportation Systems (Its) Projects Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intelligent Transportation Systems (Its) Projects Book Department of Transportation’s I NTELLIGENT T RANSPORTATION S YSTEMS (ITS) P ROJECTS B OOK Compiled by: U.S. Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Joint Program Office Federal Highway Administration Office of Traffic Management and ITS Applications Office of Safety and Traffic Operations R&D Office of Motor Carrier Safety and Technology Federal Transit Administration Office of Mobility Innovation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Office of Crash Avoidance Research TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 2 II. METROPOLITAN ITS INFRASTRUCTURE.................................................................................... 7 Traffic Signal Control ARIZONA CENTER FOR TRAFFIC AND LOGISTICS ALGORITHMS & SOFTWARE (ATLAS)...................................15 INTEGRATED RAMP METERING/ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL, Orange Co., CA....................................................16 NORTH SEATTLE ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, Seattle, WA ......................................................17 BROOKLYN-BRONX-QUEENS SIGNALIZATION ...........................................................................................................18 NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRAFFIC SIGNAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ..........................................................................19 SYRACUSE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ...................................................................................................20 Freeway Management Systems BETA TESTING OF SOFTWARE.......................................................................................................................................22 DATABASES FOR ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIONAL TESTS AND TRAFFIC MODELS.............................................23 HUMAN FACTORS IN ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ATMS) DESIGN EVOLUTION ..............24 HUMAN FACTORS COMPUTER - AIDED DESIGN TOOL FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTERS.......................25 INTEGRATION OF TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTIONS....................................................26 TRAFFIC SURVEILLANCE AND DETECTION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................27 BARBOURSVILLE-ONA, WEST VIRGINIA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT.........................................................................28 BRONX/NORTHERN MANHATTAN ATMS .....................................................................................................................29 CARAT................................................................................................................................................................................30 FAIRBORN, OHIO ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ...........................................................................31 I-90 CONNECTOR, RENSSELAER COUNTY, NEW YORK .............................................................................................32 I-275, ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA..................................................................................................................................33 I-287 SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM.......................................................................................................................................34 LOUISIANA INTERSTATE 55, 10 AND 610, INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS......................................35 LOWER HUDSON VALLEY...............................................................................................................................................36 MAGIC (METROPOLITAN AREA GUIDANCE INFORMATION & CONTROL).............................................................37 MONITOR...........................................................................................................................................................................38 NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE PROJECT.................................................................................................................................39 SYRACUSE, NEW YORK ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .............................................40 Transit Management Systems COMPUTER INTEGRATED TRANSIT MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENT (CITME)............................................42 CHICAGO SMART INTERMODAL SYSTEM, Chicago, IL ...............................................................................................43 DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT PERSONALIZED PUBLIC TRANSIT, Dallas, TX......................................................44 SMART FLEXROUTE INTEGRATED REAL-TIME ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM (SAFIRES), Northern Virginia............45 SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION (SMART) PROJECT, Detroit, MI..........47 WINSTON-SALEM MOBILITY MANAGEMENT - PHASE II, Winston-Salem, NC .........................................................48 Incident Management Systems NEW JERSEY POLICE COMMUNICATION CENTER .....................................................................................................50 Electronic Toll Collection DADE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY, FLORIDA TOLL COLLLECTION SYSTEM ...............................................................52 NEW JERSEY ELECTRONIC TOLL AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ............................................................................53 NEW YORK CITY TOLL PLAZA SCANNERS..................................................................................................................54 Electronic Fare Payment Programs MULTI-USE SMART CARD SPECIFICATIONS AND GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT..................................................56 i NORTHERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL FARE SYSTEM, Northern Virginia .........................................................................57 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE SMART DART, Wilmington, DE .......................................................................................58 Railroad Crossings RAILROAD HIGHWAY CROSSING - LONG ISLAND, NY, Long Island, NY ..................................................................60 Regional Multimodal Traveler Information ANALYSIS OF TRAVELERS' PREFERENCES FOR ROUTING........................................................................................62 DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT AND SYNTHETIC ORIGIN AND DESTINATION MATRICES ...........................63 WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRAVELER INFORMATION SERVICES PROJECT: REGIONAL IMPACTS MODELING ........................................................................................................................................................................65 DIRECT, Detroit, MI ...........................................................................................................................................................66 HOUSTON SMART COMMUTER, Houston, TX ................................................................................................................67 LYNX PASSENGER TRAVEL PLANNING SYSTEM, FL.................................................................................................68 MIAMI REAL-TIME PASSENGER INFORMATION SYSTEM, Dade Co., FL ..................................................................69 NEW YORK CITY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TRAVEL INFORMATION SYSTEM, New York City metro area...................................................................................................................................70 TRAVINFO, San Francisco, CA...........................................................................................................................................71 ADVANCE CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION CENTER........................................................................72 CUMBERLAND GAP TUNNEL, KENTUCKY...................................................................................................................73 INGLEWOOD, CALIFORNIA ATMS PROJECT ................................................................................................................74 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT....................................................................................................................75 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI INTERMODAL COMMON COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY ....................................76 MARKET STREET AND PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER PASSENGER INFORMATION CENTER...........77 NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION CONGESTION MITIGATION........................................................................................78 NEW YORK THRUWAY AUTHORITY ALBANY TRAFFIC OPERATIONS CENTER....................................................79 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEM............................................................................80 SMART CORRIDOR ...........................................................................................................................................................81 WASHINGTON, D.C. - PARTNERS IN MOTION (TRAVELER INFORMATION PROJECT) ..........................................82 Integrated Systems – Priority Corridors HOUSTON ITS PRIORITY CORRIDOR .............................................................................................................................84 I-95 NORTHEAST CORRIDOR ..........................................................................................................................................88 MIDWEST (GARY-CHICAGO-MILWAUKEE) ITS PRIORITY CORRIDOR ....................................................................91 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CORRIDOR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cedar Breaks National Monument NRCA
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRR—2018/1631 ON THIS PAGE Markagunt Penstemon. Photo Credit: NPS ON THE COVER Clouds over Red Rock. Photo Credit:© Rob Whitmore Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRR—2018/1631 Author Name(s) Lisa Baril, Kimberly Struthers, and Patricia Valentine-Darby Utah State University Department of Environment and Society Logan, Utah Editing and Design Kimberly Struthers May 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Gap National Historical Park Foundation Document Overview
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Cumberland Gap National Historical Park Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia Contact Information For more information about the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (606)248-2817 or write to: Superintendent, Cumberland Gap National Historical Park, 91 Bartlett Park Road, Middlesboro, KY 40965 Purpose Significance Significance statements express why Cumberland Gap National Historical Park resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. • Crossing the Great Appalachian Barrier. The Cumberland Gap represents a turning point in American history as the Gap witnessed nearly 300,000 settlers pushing through the Appalachian barrier during the late 18th to early 19th century. Today some 40 million Americans can trace their history to crossing through the Gap. • Geology. Cumberland Gap National Historical Park protects an extensive array of geologic features formed over the course of hundreds of millions of years in the wake of numerous Appalachian orogenies (mountain-forming periods). The park’s notable concentration of caves and The purpose of Cumberland Gap karst formations, cliffs, pinnacles, and other geologic national HistoriCal park is to features provide a valuable window into the dynamic nature preserve, protect, and interpret the of the landscape and the impact of geology on human geologic “doorway to the west”—the migration and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Suspended Where Possible for July 4
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Acting Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: July 1, 2020 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Construction suspended where possible for July 4 Non-emergency closures called off, but motorists should still expect work zones SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Fourth of July holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. July 2 to 11:59 p.m. July 5. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Work zone speed limits will remain in effect where posted. Please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober. District 1 City of Chicago: • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: • o Inbound Kennedy (Interstate 90/94) Expressway exit to inbound Ida B. Wells Drive. o Outbound Dan Ryan Expressway exit to Taylor Street and Roosevelt Road. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive entrance from Canal Street. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Dan Ryan. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Kennedy. o Inbound Eisenhower Expressway (Interstate -290) to outbound Kennedy; detour with U-turn posted. o Inbound Eisenhower; lane reductions continue. o Inbound Ida B. Wells Drive; lane reductions continue. • Outbound Kennedy exit at Canfield Road; closed. • Westbound Bryn Mawr Avenue between Harlem and Oriole avenues; lane reductions continue. • Westbound Higgins Avenue between Oriole and Canfield avenues; lane reductions continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Lochranza Castle Statement of Significance
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC090 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90206) Taken into State care: 1956 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2004 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE LOCHRANZA CASTLE We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Environment Scotland 2019 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Historic Environment Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH +44 (0) 131 668 8600 www.historicenvironment.scot You can download this publication from our website at www.historicenvironment.scot Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH LOCHRANZA CASTLE BRIEF DESCRIPTION Lochranza Castle occupies a low, gravelly peninsula projecting into Loch Ranza on the north coast of Arran and was constructed during the late 13th or early 14th centuries as a two-storey hall house.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Reso 1..2
    *LRB09621705GRL39304r* SJ0118 LRB096 21705 GRL 39304 r 1 SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 2 WHEREAS, The Chicago - Kansas City Expressway (C-KC) 3 corridor through Illinois and Missouri forms a unified corridor 4 of commerce between 2 of the major commercial and tourism 5 centers in the Midwest; and 6 WHEREAS, The portion of the Chicago - Kansas City 7 Expressway corridor from Chicago to the Quad Cities, Galesburg, 8 Monmouth, Macomb, and Quincy, constitutes a major artery for 9 travel, commerce, and economic opportunity for a significant 10 portion of the State of Illinois; and 11 WHEREAS, It is appropriate that this highway corridor 12 through Illinois connecting to the corridor in the State of 13 Missouri be uniquely signed as the Chicago - Kansas City 14 Expressway (C-KC) to facilitate the movement of traffic; 15 therefore, be it 16 RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETY-SIXTH GENERAL 17 ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 18 CONCURRING HEREIN, that we designate Interstate 88, the 19 portions of Interstate 55 and Interstate 80 from Chicago to the 20 Quad Cities, Interstate 74 to Galesburg, U.S. Route 34 to 21 Monmouth, U.S. Route 67 to Macomb, Illinois 336 to Interstate 22 172 at Quincy, Interstate 172 to Interstate 72, and Interstate -2-SJ0118LRB096 21705 GRL 39304 r 1 72 to the crossing of the Mississippi River at Hannibal, 2 Missouri as the Illinois portion of the Chicago - Kansas City 3 Expressway and marked concurrently with the existing route 4 numbers as Illinois Route 110; and be it further 5 RESOLVED, That the Illinois Department of Transportation 6 is requested to erect at every route marker, consistent with 7 State and federal regulations, signs displaying the approved 8 C-KC logo and Illinois Route 110; and be it further 9 RESOLVED, That suitable copies of this resolution be 10 delivered to the Secretary of the Illinois Department of 11 Transportation, the Director of the Missouri Department of 12 Transportation, and the Mayors of Chicago, the Quad-Cities, 13 Galesburg, Monmouth, Macomb, and Quincy..
    [Show full text]
  • The Vauban Circular Walk the Vauban Circular Walk
    The Vauban Circular Walk The Vauban Circular Walk The Vauban circuit takes visitors through the historic parts of the city of Luxembourg to the points of strategic importance in one of Europe’s most impressive fortresses, through old city gates and dark casemates, across large fortified bridges to caponiers and a series of bastions. The circuit bears the name of the famous French military engineer, active during the reign of Louis XIV, Sebastien Le Prestre de Vauban (1633-1707). Appointed commissioner for fortifications at the age of just twenty-two, Vauban built or enlarged more than 160 fortresses in total. When he arrived in Luxembourg with the French enemy troops, the Spanish held sovereignty over the fortified city, which from the Middle Ages onward had been ruled by a number of foreign powers in turn. Highly experienced in warfare, Vauban was entrusted with the technical control of the siege of Luxembourg by the French in 1684. After the capture of the fortified city, he oversaw the reconstruction work on the fortress, turning it into the “Gibraltar of the North”, one of Europe's mightiest fortresses of the age. Even though the fortress was almost totally demolished (starting in 1867), the reconstruction work and the addition of forts, redoubts and barracks built by Vauban between 1685 and 1688 with the help of 3,000 labourers, earned the city View over the old town the prestige it still enjoys today. In 1994, sections of the forti- fications and the Old Town were listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site. Following the traces of Vauban (General Commissioner for Fortifications), you will discover sites that bear witness to Luxembourg’s military past, experience the medieval charm of the old Lower Town of Pfaffenthal and, from the fortified heights, enjoy breathtaking panoramic views of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • 4855 Interstate 55
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM INTERSTATE 55 4855 JACKSON, MS 39206 www.4855Interstate55.com AFFILIATED BUSINESS DISCLOSURE review all such summaries and other documents of whatever nature independently and not rely on the contents of this CBRE, Inc. operates within a global family of companies Memorandum in any manner. with many subsidiaries and/or related entities (each an “Affiliate”) engaging in a broad range of commercial real Neither the Owner or CBRE, Inc, nor any of their respective estate businesses including, but not limited to, brokerage directors, officers, Affiliates or representatives make any services, property and facilities management, valuation, representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the investment fund management and development. At times accuracy or completeness of this Memorandum or any of its 4855 INTERSTATE 55 TABLE OF CONTENTS different Affiliates may represent various clients with contents, and no legal commitment or obligation shall arise competing interests in the same transaction. For example, by reason of your receipt of this Memorandum or use of its this Memorandum may be received by our Affiliates, contents; and you are to rely solely on your investigations and including CBRE Investors, Inc. or Trammell Crow Company. inspections of the Property in evaluating a possible purchase Those, or other, Affiliates may express an interest in the of the real property. property described in this Memorandum (the “Property”) The Owner expressly reserved the right, at its sole discretion, may submit an offer to purchase the Property and may be the to reject any or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase successful bidder for the Property.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interstate Highway System Turns 60
    The Interstate Highway System turns 60: Challenges to Its Ability to Continue to Save Lives, Time and Money JUNE 27, 2016 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP ® of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization that researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues. TRIP is sponsored by insurance companies, equipment manufacturers, distributors and suppliers; businesses involved in highway and transit engineering and construction; labor unions; and organizations concerned with efficient and safe surface transportation. Executive Summary Sixty years ago the nation embarked on its greatest public works project, the construction of the Interstate Highway System. President Dwight D. Eisenhower provided strong support for the building of an Interstate Highway System that would improve traffic safety, reduce travel times and improve the nation’s economic productivity. Serving as the most critical transportation link in the nation’s economy, the Interstate Highway System has significantly improved the lives of U.S. residents and visitors. Throughout the nation, the Interstate system allows for high levels of mobility by greatly reducing travel times and providing a significantly higher level of traffic safety than other routes. But 60 years after President Eisenhower articulated a vision for the nation’s transportation system, the U. S. again faces a challenge in modernizing its aging and increasingly congested Interstate highway system. If Americans are to continue to enjoy their current level of personal and commercial mobility on Interstate highways and bridges, the nation will need to make a commitment to identifying a long-term funding source to support a well-maintained Interstate Highway System able to meet the nation’s need for additional mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Gap Master Plan and Trailhead Development Plan
    Cumberland Gap Master Plan and Trailhead Development Plan Community Development Partners Cumberland Gap Master Plan and Trailhead Development Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Community Vision ............................................................................. 33 Executive Summary ............................................................................. 1 Steering Committee ........................................................................ 33 The Historic Town of Cumberland Gap .......................................... 2 Cumberland Gap Master Plan Survey ......................................... 33 Community Need................................................................................. 3 Public Meetings .............................................................................. 35 What is the Cumberland Gap Master Plan? ..................................... 5 Vision Statement ............................................................................ 36 How Will the Plan Be Used? .......................................................... 6 Mentor Communities ......................................................................... 37 Plan Consistency .............................................................................. 7 Banner Elk ....................................................................................... 37 Project Area ...................................................................................... 8 Damascus .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I-69 Final Eis Document 6-28-06
    FHWA-TN-EIS-04-01F INTERSTATE 69, SECTION OF INDEPENDENT UTILITY #9 From the Interstate 55/MS State Route 304 Interchange in Hernando, Mississippi to the Intersection of U.S. 51 and State Route 385 in Millington, Tennessee DeSoto and Marshall Counties, Mississippi Shelby and Fayette Counties, Tennessee Final Environmental Impact Statement Submitted Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Tennessee Department of Transportation and Mississippi Department of Transportation Cooperating Agency Tennessee Valley Authority U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Memphis District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg District U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service This document identifies and assesses the environmental impacts associated with the construction of an interstate facility from Hernando, Mississippi to Millington, Tennessee. The project is a segment of Corridor 18, a Congressionally-designated High Priority transportation Corridor that will be designated as Interstate 69. Segments of the roadway are proposed for new locations, while other segments will follow existing interstates and state highways built to interstate standards. The length of the proposed improvement is approximately 44 miles. __________________ ______________________________________________________________ Date of Approval For Federal Highway Administration __________________ ______________________________________________________________ Date of Approval For
    [Show full text]
  • Lanes Opening Where Possible for Labor Day Travel
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: Sept. 2, 2021 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Lanes opening where possible for Labor Day travel Non-emergency closures suspended, though active work zones across state SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Labor Day holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. Friday, Sept. 3, to 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 7. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Motorists can expect delays and should allow extra time for trips through these areas. Drivers are urged to pay close attention to changed conditions and signs in the work zones, obey the posted speed limits, refrain from using mobile devices and stay alert for workers and equipment. At all times, please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober District 1 Chicago • Northbound Pulaski Road between 76th and 77th streets; lane reductions continue. • Cicero Avenue (Illinois 50) between 67th and 71st streets; lane reductions continue. • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive to outbound Dan Ryan Expressway (Interstate 90/94); detour posted. o Inbound Kennedy (I-90/94) to Jackson Street. o Inbound Kennedy to Adams Street. o Outbound Kennedy from Adams Street. o Outbound Kennedy from Jackson Street. o Outbound Kennedy to Randolph Street. o Outbound Kennedy to Washington Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachian Cultural Resources Workshop Papers
    Appalachian Cultural Resources Workshop Papers NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Appalachian Cultural Resources Workshop Papers APPALACHIAN Cultural Resources Workshop Papers Papers presented at the workshop held at Owens Hall, University of North Carolina- Asheville on April 1 and 2, 1991 Edited by Ruthanne Livaditis Mitchel 1993 National Park Service, Southeast Regional Office Office of Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Planning Division TABLE OF CONTENTS appalachian/index.htm Last Updated: 30-Sep-2008 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/sero/appalachian/index.htm[7/12/2012 8:13:52 AM] Appalachian Cultural Resources Workshop Papers (Table of Contents) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Appalachian Cultural Resources Workshop Papers TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Cover photo from the Blue Ridge Parkway Archives. A 1941 view of Mabry Mill during restoration work. An Overview Of The Workshop Proceedings Ruthanne Livaditis Mitchell Historical Significance Of The Blue Ridge Parkway Ian Firth The Peaks of Otter And The Johnson Farm On The Blue Ridge Parkway Jean Haskell Speer Identification And Preservation Of Nineteenth And Twentieth Century Homesites In The Pisgah and Nantahala National Forests Rodney J. Snedeker and Michael A. Harmon Rural Historic Landscapes And Interpretive Planning On Our Southern National Forests Delce Dyer and Quentin Bass Fish Weirs As Part Of The Cultural Landscape Anne Frazer Rogers Southern Appalachia And The New South Ideal: Asheville As A Case Study In Development Kent Cave Cumberland Homesteads, A Resettlement Community Of
    [Show full text]