DOCSLIB.ORG

Cedar Breaks National Monument NRCA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cedar Breaks National Monument NRCA National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRR—2018/1631 ON THIS PAGE Markagunt Penstemon. Photo Credit: NPS ON THE COVER Clouds over Red Rock. Photo Credit:© Rob Whitmore Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRR—2018/1631 Author Name(s) Lisa Baril, Kimberly Struthers, and Patricia Valentine-Darby Utah State University Department of Environment and Society Logan, Utah Editing and Design Kimberly Struthers May 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review, which was provided by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. The level and extent of peer review was based on the importance of report content or its potentially controversial or precedent-setting nature. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Natural Resource Condition Assessment Program website and the Natural Resource Publications Management website. If you have difficulty accessing information in this publication, particularly if using assistive technology, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Baril, L., K. Struthers, and P. L. Valentine-Darby. 2018. Cedar Breaks National Monument: Natural resource condition assessment. Natural Resource Report NPS/NCPN/NRR—2018/1631. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 154/145000, May 2018 ii Contents Page Figures ................................................................................................................................................... vi Tables ................................................................................................................................................... ix Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. xii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................xiv Chapter 1. NRCA Background Information ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2. Introduction and Resource Setting ............................................................................................ 4 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1.1. Enabling Legislation/Executive Orders ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2. Geographic Setting ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3. Visitation Statistics ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2. Natural Resources ............................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1. Ecological Units, Watersheds, and NPScape Landscape-scale ......................................................................................... 7 2.2.2. Resource Descriptions ................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.3. Resource Issues Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3. Resource Stewardship ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1. Management Directives and Planning Guidance .......................................................................................................... 12 2.3.2. Status of Supporting Science ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 3. Study Scoping and Design ....................................................................................................... 15 3.4. Study Design ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.1. Indicator Framework, Focal Study Resources and Indicators ......................................................................................... 16 3.4.2. Reporting Areas .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.3. General Approach and Methods ................................................................................................................................. 17 Chapter 4. Natural Resource Conditions ................................................................................................... 20 4.1. Viewshed ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1.1. Background and Importance ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1.2. Data and Methods ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1.3. Reference Conditions .................................................................................................................................................. 28 4.1.4. Condition and Trend ................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.1.5. Sources of Expertise .................................................................................................................................................... 34 4.2. Night Sky ........................................................................................................................................................... 37 4.2.1. Background and Importance ....................................................................................................................................... 37 4.2.2. Data and Methods ...................................................................................................................................................... 38 4.2.3. Reference Conditions .................................................................................................................................................. 40 4.2.4. Condition and Trend ................................................................................................................................................... 43 4.2.5. Sources of Expertise .................................................................................................................................................... 47 4.3. Soundscape ....................................................................................................................................................... 49 4.3.1. Background and Importance ....................................................................................................................................... 49 4.3.2. Data and Methods .....................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Paleoecology and Fire History from Crater Lake
    THE PALEOECOLOGY AND FIRE HISTORY FROM CRATER LAKE, COLORADO: THE LAST 1000 YEARS By Charles T. Mogen A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Environmental Science and Policy Northern Arizona University August 2018 Approved: R. Scott Anderson, Ph.D., Chair Nicholas P. McKay, Ph.D. Darrell S. Kaufman, Ph.D. Abstract High-resolution pollen, plant macrofossil, charcoal and pyrogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) records were developed from a 154 cm long sediment core collected from Crater Lake (37.39°N, 106.70°W; 3328 m asl), San Juan Mountains, Colorado. Several studies have explored Holocene paleo-vegetation and fire histories from mixed conifer and subalpine bogs and lakes in the San Juan and southern Rocky Mountains utilizing both palynological and charcoal studies, but most have been at relatively low resolution. In addition to presenting the highest resolution palynological study over the last 1000 years from the southern Rocky Mountains, this thesis also presents the first high-resolution pyrogenic PAH and charcoal paired analysis aimed at understanding both long-term fire history and the unresolved relationship between how each of these proxies depict paleofire events. Pollen assemblages, pollen ratios, and paleofire activity, indicated by charcoal and pyrogenic PAH records, were used to infer past climatic conditions. Although the ecosystem surrounding Crater Lake has remained a largely spruce (Picea) dominated forest, the proxies developed in this thesis suggest there were two distinct climate intervals between ~1035 to ~1350 CE and ~1350 to ~1850 CE in the southern Rocky Mountains, associated with the Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA) and Little Ice Age (LIA) respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Meeting Packet
    PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE Nevada Land Management Task Force (Established Pursuant to Assembly Bill 227 enacted in the 2013 Legislative Session) August 16, 2013, 1:00 p.m. Eureka Opera House 31 S. Main St. Eureka, NV 89316 AGENDA Some Task Force members may attend via telephone from other locations. Items on the agenda may be taken out of order. The Task Force may combine two or more agenda items for consideration. The Task Force may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Call to Order, Roll Call 1. Public Comment. Please Limit Comments to 3 Minutes 2. Approval of Agenda. For Possible Action. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the June 28, 2013 Meeting of the Nevada Land Management Task Force. For Possible Action. (Attachment) 4. Overview of Legislation in Other Western States Regarding the Transfer of Public Lands. 5. Presentation on Studies Commissioned by Eureka County in 1994 and 1996 on Public Lands Transfer Issues. 6. Initial Discussion on Potential Lands to be Included in a Transfer of Public Lands from the Federal Government to Nevada. (Attachment) 7. Initial Discussion of Cost and Revenue Implications of the Transfer of Public Lands to Nevada. (Attachment) 8. Initial Discussion on Transferring Multiple Uses, Including but not Limited to Outdoor Recreation, Mining and Prospecting, Timber, Grazing, and Fish and Wildlife Purposes, with the Transfer of Public Lands. 9. Initial Discussion on Which Public Lands, if Transferred to State Ownership, Should be Sold or Exchanged into the Private Sector and How Should the Sales Take Place? 10.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2018 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2018 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2018 As of September 30, 2018 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20250-0003 Web site: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover photo courtesy of: Chris Chavez Statistics are current as of: 10/15/2018 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,948,059 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 506 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 128 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 446 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The FS also administers several other types of nationally-designated areas: 1 National Historic Area in 1 State 1 National Scenic Research Area in 1 State 1 Scenic Recreation Area in 1 State 1 Scenic Wildlife Area in 1 State 2 National Botanical Areas in 1 State 2 National Volcanic Monument Areas in 2 States 2 Recreation Management Areas in 2 States 6 National Protection Areas in 3 States 8 National Scenic Areas in 6 States 12 National Monument Areas in 6 States 12 Special Management Areas in 5 States 21 National Game Refuge or Wildlife Preserves in 12 States 22 National Recreation Areas in 20 States Table of Contents Acreage Calculation ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Applicant Report Type Status Applicant Name
    Active Applicant Report Type Status Applicant Name Gaming PENDING ABAH, TYRONE ABULENCIA, JOHN AGUDELO, ROBERT JR ALAMRI, HASSAN ALFONSO-ZEA, CRISTINA ALLEN, BRIAN ALTMAN, JONATHAN AMBROSE, DEZARAE AMOROSE, CHRISTINE ARROYO, BENJAMIN ASHLEY, BRANDY BAILEY, SHANAKAY BAINBRIDGE, TASHA BAKER, GAUDY BANH, JOHN BARBER, GAVIN BARRETO, JESSE BECKEY, TORI BEHANNA, AMANDA BELL, JILL 10/1/2021 7:00:09 AM Gaming PENDING BENEDICT, FREDRIC BERNSTEIN, KENNETH BIELAK, BETHANY BIRON, WILLIAM BOHANNON, JOSEPH BOLLEN, JUSTIN BORDEWICZ, TIMOTHY BRADDOCK, ALEX BRADLEY, BRANDON BRATETICH, JASON BRATTON, TERENCE BRAUNING, RICK BREEN, MICHELLE BRIGNONI, KARLI BROOKS, KRISTIAN BROWN, LANCE BROZEK, MICHAEL BRUNN, STEVEN BUCHANAN, DARRELL BUCKLEY, FRANCIS BUCKNER, DARLENE BURNHAM, CHAD BUTLER, MALKAI 10/1/2021 7:00:09 AM Gaming PENDING BYRD, AARON CABONILAS, ANGELINA CADE, ROBERT JR CAMPBELL, TAPAENGA CANO, LUIS CARABALLO, EMELISA CARDILLO, THOMAS CARLIN, LUKE CARRILLO OLIVA, GERBERTH CEDENO, ALBERTO CENTAURI, RANDALL CHAPMAN, ERIC CHARLES, PHILIP CHARLTON, MALIK CHOATE, JAMES CHURCH, CHRISTOPHER CLARKE, CLAUDIO CLOWNEY, RAMEAN COLLINS, ARMONI CONKLIN, BARRY CONKLIN, QIANG CONNELL, SHAUN COPELAND, DAVID 10/1/2021 7:00:09 AM Gaming PENDING COPSEY, RAYMOND CORREA, FAUSTINO JR COURSEY, MIAJA COX, ANTHONIE CROMWELL, GRETA CUAJUNO, GABRIEL CULLOM, JOANNA CUTHBERT, JENNIFER CYRIL, TWINKLE DALY, CADEJAH DASILVA, DENNIS DAUBERT, CANDACE DAVIES, JOEL JR DAVILA, KHADIJAH DAVIS, ROBERT DEES, I-QURAN DELPRETE, PAUL DENNIS, BRENDA DEPALMA, ANGELINA DERK, ERIC DEVER, BARBARA
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Whole-Of-Society Resilience Observations from a Case Study in Pemberton Valley
    CAN UNCLASSIFIED Implementing Whole-of-Society Resilience Observations from a Case Study in Pemberton Valley Godsoe, M Genik, L. DRDC – Centre for Security Science CRISMART, National Defense College, Sweden, Book Title: Policy Dialogues on Community Resilience Date of Publication from Ext Publisher: November 2015 Defence Research and Development Canada External Literature (P) DRDC-RDDC-2017-P097 November 2017 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS Disclaimer: This document is not published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada, but is to be catalogued in the Canadian Defence Information System (CANDIS), the national repository for Defence S&T documents. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence) makes no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, of any kind whatsoever, and assumes no liability for the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or usefulness of any information, product, process or material included in this document. Nothing in this document should be interpreted as an endorsement for the specific use of any tool, technique or process examined in it. Any reliance on, or use of, any information, product, process or material included in this document is at the sole risk of the person so using it or relying on it. Canada does not assume any liability in respect of any damages or losses arising out of or in connection with the use of, or reliance on, any information, product, process or material included in this document. This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Weedy Chenopodium Complex in the North Central States
    UNDERSTANDING THE WEEDY CHENOPODIUM COMPLEX IN THE NORTH CENTRAL STATES BY SUKHVINDER SINGH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Crop Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Patrick J. Tranel, Chair Associate Professor Aaron G. Hager Associate Professor Geoffrey A. Levin Assistant Professor Matthew E. Hudson ABSTRACT The genus Chenopodium consists of several important weed species, including Chenopodium album, C. berlandieri, C. strictum, and C. ficifolium. All of these species share similar vegetative morphology and high phenotypic plasticity, which makes it difficult to correctly identify these species. All of these weedy Chenopodium species have developed resistance to one or more classes of herbicides. An experiment was conducted to determine if there is variability in response of Chenopodium species present in the North Central states to glyphosate. Our results indicate variable responses within and among the Chenopodium species. Species such as C. berlandieri and C. ficifolium had higher levels of tolerance to glyphosate than did various accessions of C. album. In another experiment, 33 populations of Chenopodium sampled across six North Central states were screened with glyphosate. The results showed variable responses to glyphosate within and among the Chenopodium populations. In general, the Chenopodium populations from Iowa were more tolerant, but some biotypes from North Dakota, Indiana and Kansas also had significantly high tolerance to glyphosate. Given there are species other than C. album that have high tolerance to glyphosate, and there are Chenopodium populations across the North Central states that showed tolerance to glyphosate, one intriguing question was to whether the Chenopodium populations were either biotypes of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 10 Years of Preserving and Sharing National 4-H History
    Celebrating 10 Years of Preserving and Sharing National 4-H History May/June 2017 Newsletter Volume VIII Number IV Over 400,000 Visits to 4-H History Website On this Day in 4-H History: 90th Anniversary of First National 4-H Camp and Adoption of National Pledge and Motto The first National 4-H camp was held June 16-23, 1927, on the grounds of the Department of Agriculture in view of the Washington Monument and the US Capitol. The state 4H Leaders who were also meeting during that historic event adopted both the National 4-H Pledge and the National 4-H Motto during the camp. The following story is taken from the National Compendium of 4-H People from 179 countries have made 417,116 visits Promotion and Visibility on the National 4-H History Website at http://4-HHistory.com/?h=4-H_Promotion to the National 4-H History Preservation website since we started counting visitors on September 10, National 4-H Camp, an annual event, was held in 2011. Not surprisingly, nearly half of the visitors are Washington, DC 26 times between 1927 and 1956 from the US (201,417) and Canada (3,862). before being replaced by National 4-H Conference Interestingly, enough Japan ranks third (1,405) and in 1957. (There were no 4-H Camps held during Jamaica is fourth with (1,322) for the number of the war years.) visits. Other countries weigh in at anywhere from one visit from 22 countries to several countries with over 500 visits. How many visits have been made from your state? Go to http://4-HHistoryPreservation.com to compare your state to others.
    [Show full text]
  • JREV3.6FULL.Pdf
    KNO ED YOUNG FM98 MONDAY thru FRIDAY 11 am to 3 pm: CHARLES M. WEISENBERG SLEEPY I STEVENSON SUNDAY 8 to 9 pm: EVERYDAY 12 midnite to 2 am: STEIN MONDAY thru SATURDAY 7 to 11 pm: KNOBVT THE CENTER OF 'He THt fM DIAL FM 98 KNOB Los Angeles F as a composite contribution of Dom Cerulli, Jack Tynan and others. What LETTERS actually happened was that Jack Tracy, then editor of Down Beat, decided the magazine needed some humor and cre• ated Out of My Head by George Crater, which he wrote himself. After several issues, he welcomed contributions from the staff, and Don Gold and I began. to contribute regularly. After Jack left, I inherited Crater's column and wrote it, with occasional contributions from Don and Jack Tynan, until I found that the well was running dry. Don and I wrote it some more and then Crater sort of passed from the scene, much like last year's favorite soloist. One other thing: I think Bill Crow will be delighted to learn that the picture of Billie Holiday he so admired on the cover of the Decca Billie Holiday memo• rial album was taken by Tony Scott. Dom Cerulli New York City PRAISE FAMOUS MEN Orville K. "Bud" Jacobson died in West Palm Beach, Florida on April 12, 1960 of a heart attack. He had been there for his heart since 1956. It was Bud who gave Frank Teschemacher his first clarinet lessons, weaning him away from violin. He was directly responsible for the Okeh recording date of Louis' Hot 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Lists 2018-2019 ◆ Springfi Eld Business Journal 2 ◆ Book of Lists 2018-2019 ◆ Springfi Eld Business Journal TABLE of CONTENTS Address: P.O
    BUSINESSSPRINGFIELD $19.99 springfieldbusinessjournal.com JOURNAL 2018-2019 of THE MUST-HAVE BOOK FOR BUSINESS IN SPRINGFIELD 2 ◆ Book of Lists 2018-2019 ◆ Springfi eld Business Journal 2 ◆ Book of Lists 2018-2019 ◆ Springfi eld Business Journal TABLE OF CONTENTS Address: P.O. Box 398, Springfi eld, IL 62705 Phone: 217-726-6600 Major Architectural Firms ........................................................................................................................4 Website: springfi eldbusinessjournal.com Email: info@springfi eldbusinessjournal.com Major Engineering Firms .........................................................................................................................6 Facebook: facebook.com/sbjmonthly Commercial Builders ...............................................................................................................................8 Twitter: twitter.com/sbjmonthly Trade Unions .........................................................................................................................................11 Editor: Fletcher Farrar fl etcher@springfi eldbusinessjournal.com Electrical Contractors ............................................................................................................................12 Publisher: Michelle Ownbey Mechanical Contractors ........................................................................................................................15 michelle@springfi eldbusinessjournal.com Commercial Real Estate ........................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Lochranza Castle Statement of Significance
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC090 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90206) Taken into State care: 1956 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2004 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE LOCHRANZA CASTLE We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Environment Scotland 2019 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Historic Environment Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH +44 (0) 131 668 8600 www.historicenvironment.scot You can download this publication from our website at www.historicenvironment.scot Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH LOCHRANZA CASTLE BRIEF DESCRIPTION Lochranza Castle occupies a low, gravelly peninsula projecting into Loch Ranza on the north coast of Arran and was constructed during the late 13th or early 14th centuries as a two-storey hall house.
    [Show full text]