DOCSLIB.ORG

Women Judges from Around the World Remember Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Women Judges from Around the World Remember Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg W O M E N J U D G E S F R O M A R O U N D T H E W O R L D R E M E M B E R J U S T I C E R U T H B A D E R G I N S B U R G W E L C O M E R E M A R K S Dean Robert Dinerstein Washington College of Law Professor Federiga Bindi Institute for Women's Policy Research R E F L E C T I O N S A N D Hon. Baroness Hale of Richmond M O D E R A T E D D I S C U S S I O N Former President, Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Hon. Justice Hannah Okwengu Court of Appeal of Kenya Hon. Judge Alexandra Prechal Court of Justice of the European Union Hon. Judge Flavia Viana Court of Justice of the State of Paraná, Brazil Professor Daniela Kraiem Washington College of Law Shawana Wilson Intl. Association of Women Judges C L O S I N G R E M A R K S Fernanda Nicola Washington College of Law D E A N R O B E R T D I N E R S T E I N Robert Dinerstein is acting dean, professor of law, and director of the Disability Rights Law Clinic at American University Washington College of Law (AUWCL), where he has taught since 1983. His previous positions include serving as the law school's associate dean for academic affairs from (1997-2004), associate dean for experiential education (2012-2018), and director of the clinical program (1988-96 and 2008-2018). He specializes in the fields of clinical education and disability law, especially mental disabilities law (including issues of consent/choice, capacity and alternatives to guardianship), the Americans with Disabilities Act, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, legal representation of clients with mental disabilities, and disability and international human rights. Dinerstein has made numerous presentations on clinical legal education and disability law, among other topics, and has published a number of books, articles, chapters and other writing on these subjects. P R O F E S S O R F E D E R I G A B I N D I Prof. Federiga Bindi holds the Jean Monnet Chair at the University of Rome Tor Vergata, where she also was the founding director of the European Center of Excellence, and is the Director of the Foreign Policy Initiative at the Institute for Women Policy Research (IWPR) in Washington DC, where she leads an EU- funded research network on Women Leadership and one on Internationalization of Higher Education. Prof. Bindi holds a Ph.D. for the European University Institute and has published eight books including Europe and America: The End of Transatlantic Relations? (2019) The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe’s Role in the World (2010 & 2012); The Frontiers of Europe: A Transatlantic Problem? (2011); Italy and the EU (2011), Analyzing European Union Politics (2012). Prof. Bindi has been a visiting fellow in several institutions, including the Brookings Institution, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Sciences Po in Paris, the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, the University of Lisbon, an the Université Libre de Bruxelles. Dr. Bindi also served in government, in both Europe and the US, directed the international affairs department at the Italian National School of Administration and the Italian Cultural Institute in Brussels. R T H O N . T H E B A R O N E S S H A L E O F R I C H M O N D D B E Brenda Hale retired as President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, the UK’s most senior judge, in January 2020. After teaching law at the University of Manchester for 18 years (while also practising for a short time at the Manchester Bar), then promoting the reform of the law at the Law Commission for over nine years, she became a Judge in the Family Division of the High Court of England and Wales in 1994. In 1999 she was promoted to the Court of Appeal and in 2004 became the first and only woman ‘Law Lord’ – that is, a member of the appellate committee of the House of Lords. In 2009, the Law Lords became the Justices of the Supreme Court, and she became its first woman Justice, Deputy President in 2013 an President in 2017. She is also President of the United Kingdom Association of Women Judges and a past President of the International Association of Women Judges. She has enjoyed working in all fields of the law, but her principal interests remain in family, welfare and equality law. H O N . J U S T I C E H A N N A H O K W E N G U Lady Justice Hannah Magondi Okwengu is currently a Judge in the Kenya Court of Appeals having been appointed in 2012. Judge Okwengu was appointed by the President of Kenya on the advice of the Anti-Corruption Advisory Council, as the Assistant Director in Charge of Prosecutions in the Kenya Anti-Corruption Authority (KACA) in 1999, a position she held until 2001. Thereafter she served as a Chief Magistrate until she was appointed as a judge of the High Court in 2003. In her 3 years’ experience in both private practice and service to the Kenyan people in the Judiciary, she has gathered a wealth of experience in administrative and judicial work. Also, she served in Mombasa, Nakuru and Nairobi as Chief Magistrate and Judge in Charge of Mombasa Law Court. She is the immediate former President of the International Association of Women Judges Kenya Chapter (an affiliate of the International Association of Women Judges), having been elected for two terms ending in September 2019. Currently she is a member of the Board of IAWJ representing East and Southern Africa. H O N . J U D G E S A C H A ( A L E X A N D R A ) P R E C H A L Sacha Prechal has been judge at the European Court of Justice since 2010. In that capacity, she is currently president of the Third Chamber. She studied law at the University of Groningen (1977-83). She holds a PhD in Law from University of Amsterdam (1995). She started her professional career as Lecturer in the Law Faculty of the University of Maastricht (1983-87). Between 1987 and 1991 she was Legal Secretary at the Court of Justice of the European Communities and then again Lecturer at the Europa Institute of the Law Faculty of the University of Amsterdam (1991-95). In 1995 she has been appointed Professor of European Law in the Law Faculty of the University of Tilburg and in 2003 Professor of European Law in the Law Faculty of the University of Utrecht. She is member of the editorial respectively advisory board of several national and international legal journals and member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is the author of numerous publications on EU law, in particular on judicial protection in the EU, on various aspects of the relationship etween EU law and national law, on general principles/fundamental rights, on EU anti-discrimination law and on problems related to EU directives. Between 1992 and 2009, she has been involved in the work of the European Network of Legal Experts in the field of Gender Equality, first as coordinator and between 2007-2009 as member of the Executive committee. H O N . J U D G E F L A V I A V I A N A Judge with the Court of Justice of the State of Paraná, Brazil, since 2001; Honorary President of the International Union of Portuguese Speaking Judges (President from July 2016 to November 2019); Vice-President of the Civil Law Study Commission of the International Association of Judges since 2018; Member of the Interinstitutional Study Group on Gender Equality in the State of Paraná since 2018; Director of International Affairs of the Association of Judges of Paraná since 2018; President of the Women in Politics Commission in the Electoral Court of the State of Paraná (2019); Participant in the Columbia Women's Leadership Network Program in Brazil - Columbia University - cohort 2019-2020; Coordinator of an innovative project related to the increase of women participation in the Brazilian Judiciary (SDG 5, UN 2030 Agenda) in the Brazilian National Council of Justice (2020); Post-graduate degree in Public Law and in Civil Procedure Law. D A N I E L A K R A I E M Daniela Kraiem is the Interim Senior Director of Career and Professional Development, the Director of the Women and the Law Program, and a Practitioner-in-Residence at American University Washington College of Law. In the Office of Career and Professional Development, she leads a dedicated team devoted to connecting students and alumni with professional evelopment and employment opportunities across all legal sectors. Prior to joining the Washington College of Law, Professor Kraiem represented labor unions and employees as an Associate at McCarthy, Johnson, and Miller in San Francisco, California. As a Staff Attorney at the Child Care Law Center, she specialized in early childhood education workforce development, supporting small childcare businesses, and increasing the availability of affordable, high quality childcare for all children. S H A W N A J . W I L S O N Shawna J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE The Hon. Lady Justice Effie Owuor Judge of Appeal (Retired) LLB Honours, University of East Africa, Dar-Es-Salaam P.O. Box 54392-00200 Telephone 254-20-2700257 Fax 254-20-4450252 Email:[email protected] Special Awards National Recognition, EBS (Elder of Burning Spear) Recognized by the UN Secretary General as an Advocator, Campaigner and Supporter of all Children in the World in the UNICEF’S Millennium State of the World’s Children Report . September 2005 1 Profile Born on 21st September, 1943 in Kakamega, Western Province of Kenya. A graduate of the University of East Africa, Dar-Es-Salaam with Bachelor of Laws degree. Has undertaken various professional and judicial seminars on law reform, women’s rights and criminal law. A distinguished career in the Attorney General’s chambers and Judiciary spanning over a period of 33 years. Rising through the ranks from a Resident Magistrate to a Judge of the Court of Appeal. The first lady to be appointed as a Puisne Judge and Judge of the Court of Appeal in the Republic of Kenya. A self-motivated retired Judge of Appeal with a wide range of experience in family, women, children, marital and succession law and has undertaken several consultancies leading to legislations in the aforementioned areas of law. Able to work on own initiative and in collaboration with technical teams from various professions. Proven leadership skills involving managing, developing and motivating teams to achieve their objectives. Dedicated to maintaining high quality standards and achieving set targets. Key public positions held: - Commissioner of Kenya Law Reform Commission - Founding Member and Chairperson of the Kenya Women’s Judges Association, past patron of the association.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Integrity: an Assessment of the Needs of the Justice System in the Republic of Kenya
    Restoring integrity: An assessment of the needs of the justice system in the Republic of Kenya February 2010 A Report of the International Legal Assistance Consortium and International Bar Association Human Rights Institute Supported by the Law Society of Kenya Material contained in this report may be freely quoted or reprinted, provided credit is given to the International Bar Association. Contents List of Abbreviations 6 Executive Summary 7 Chapter One – Introduction 11 1.1 The mission 11 Chapter Two – Background Information 13 2.1 Geography and demographics 13 2.2 Social and economic context 13 2.3 Contemporary political history 14 2.4 Constitutional arrangements 20 2.5 Kenya’s international legal obligations regarding due process and fair trial 23 Chapter Three – The Judicial System 25 3.1 Structure and organisation of the courts and judiciary 26 3.2 Judicial Reform Initiatives in Kenya 28 Chapter Four – The Judiciary 35 4.1 Introduction 35 4.2 Major obstacles confronting the judiciary 35 4.2.1 Constitutional framework for judicial power 35 4.2.2 Leadership of the judiciary 36 4.2.3 Composition, mandate and functioning of the Judicial Service Commission 40 4.2.4 Qualification and procedure for appointment of judges 44 4.2.5 Removal and discipline of judges 46 4.2.6 Financial autonomy 50 4.2.7 Judicial corruption 50 4.2.8 Public confidence and access to justice 52 4.3 Conclusion 54 Chapter Five – Magistrates’ Courts and the Magistracy 55 5.1 Introduction 55 5.2 Major obstacles facing the magistrates’ courts and magistracy 55 5.2.1 Structure
    [Show full text]
  • I a HISTORICAL-LEGAL ANALYSIS of WOMAN-TO-WOMAN MARRIAGE in KENYA by MONICAH WANJIRU KAREITHI Submitted in Fulfilment of The
    A HISTORICAL-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF WOMAN-TO-WOMAN MARRIAGE IN KENYA by MONICAH WANJIRU KAREITHI Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR LEGUM (LLD) In the Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria 6 February 2018 Supervisor : PROFESSOR FRANS VILJOEN i University of Pretoria DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY This document must be signed and submitted with every essay, report, project, assignment, mini-dissertation, dissertation and/or thesis. Full names of student: MONICAH WANJIRU KAREITHI Student number: 13376838 Declaration 1. I understand what plagiarism is and am aware of the University’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this thesis is my own original work. Where other people’s work has been used (either from a printed source, Internet or any other source), this has been properly acknowledged and referenced in accordance with departmental requirements. 3. I have not used work previously produced by another student or any other person to hand in as my own. 4. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his or her own work. Signature of student: ……………………………………………………………………………...... Signature of supervisor: ……………......…………………………………………………………......... ii SUMMARY A HISTORICAL-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF WOMAN-TO-WOMAN MARRIAGE IN KENYA This thesis sets out, against a historical background, to establish the legal status of woman-to- woman marriages in contemporary Kenya. The phenomenon of woman-to-woman marriage is a form of African customary marriage between two women. Woman-to-woman marriages are distinctly African and clearly distinguishable from the modern-day phenomenon of same-sex marriages, as understood and practiced especially in the global West.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating an Enabling Legal Framework for Redd+ Investments in Kenya
    CREATING AN ENABLING LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR REDD+ INVESTMENTS IN KENYA Version 1.0/June 2014 The REDD+ Law Project is led by Baker & McKenzie and the Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (University of Cambridge), working with international and local advisers/institutions to assist countries in the development and implementation of their national REDD+ legal frameworks. The Kenyan REDD+ Law Project has been generously sponsored by the Swedish Ministry of the Environment. For more information, please contact: Martijn Wilder AM Dr Sophie May Chapman + 61 2 8922 5276 | M +61 414 863 313 + 44 (0)1223 764212 [email protected] [email protected] CONTENTS OF THIS REPORT FULL TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS REPORT PART A: KEY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CREATING AN ENABLING LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR REDD+ INVESTMENTS IN KENYA PART B: BACKGROUND REPORTS List of Acronyms Report 1: Overview of Kenyan law applicable to REDD+ implementation Report 2: Managing public REDD+ investments in Kenya Report 3: Engaging the private sector in REDD+ implementation in Kenya Report 4: Climate-smart agriculture and REDD+ implementation in Kenya Annexes Selected references i FULL TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS REPORT 1. THE KENYAN REDD+ LAW PROJECT 1.1 About the REDD+ Law Project 1.2 Contributions from Kenyan advisors and institutions 1.3 Sponsor of this output of the Kenyan REDD+ Law Project 2. LIST OF AUTHORS 3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4. A NOTE ON REFERENCING 5 DISCLAIMER PART A: KEY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CREATING AN ENABLING LEGAL FRAMEWORK
    [Show full text]
  • National Constitutional Conference Documents
    NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE DOCUMENTS THE FINAL REPORT OF TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP “E” ON THE JUDICIARY APPROVED FOR ISSUE AT THE 110 TH PLENARY MEETING OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA REVIEW COMMISSION HELD ON 30 NOVEMBER, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page: 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………… 3 2. The Mandate of the Committee…………………………………………….……..… 3 3. General Comments on the Main Report………………………………………….… 6 3.1 Judicial Power…………………………………………………………… 6 3.2 Hierarchy of Courts………………………………………………………….. 6 3.3 The Supreme Court……………………………………………………….... 6 3.4 The Court of Appeal………………………………………………………... 7 3.5 The High Court……………………………………………………………... 7 3.6 The Industrial Court…………………………………………………….…... 8 3.7 Kadhis’ Court……………………………………………………………….. 8 3.8 Tribunals……………………………………………………………………. 9 3.9 Independence of the Judiciary……………………………………………… 10 3.10 Appointment of Judges……………………………………………………... 10 3.11 Qualifications for appointment of Judges…………………………………... 10 3.12 Tenure of office of Judges………………………………………………….. 11 3.13 Removal from office………………………………………………………... 11 3.14 The Judicial Service Commission………………………………………….. 12 3.15 The Attorney General.…………………………………………………….... 12 3.16 The Director of Public Prosecutions……………………..….……………… 13 3.17 The Public Defender………………………………………………………... 13 3.18 Prerogative of Mercy………………………………………………….……. 13 4 Specific Recommendations on the Amendments to the Draft Bill……………… 14 5. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………. 24 6. Appendices………………………………………………………………………… 77 Appendix A– List of Committee Members……………………………………………...
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Procedure Bench Book
    CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BENCH BOOK February 2018 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................. xi FOREWORD ................................................................................................ xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................... xv USER GUIDE ............................................................................................... xvi CHAPTER ONE: PRINCIPLES UNDERPINNING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM .......... 1 I. Introduction .............................................................................................. 2 II. The Constitutional Framework for State Organs ...................................... 3 III. Equality and Dignity ................................................................................. 3 IV. Vulnerable and Disadvantaged Groups .................................................... 4 V. Freedom from Torture, Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment ........ 5 VI. Privacy ...................................................................................................... 5 VII. The Constitution and the Judicial Process Generally ............................... 6 Independence of the Judiciary: The Institution and the Court .................. 6 Expeditious Trial ...................................................................................... 6 Undue Regard for Technicalities .............................................................. 6 Transparency and Accountability
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Freedom of Expression and Its Role in Political Transformation In
    THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND ITS ROLE IN POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION IN KENYA by Eric Kibet Morusoi Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor Legum (LLD) In the Faculty of Law University of Pretoria October 2016 Supervisor: Professor Charles Manga Fombad © University of Pretoria Declaration of Originality I, the undersigned, hereby declare that this thesis, which I submit for the degree Doctor Legum (LLD) in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria, is my own work and has not previously been submitted for a degree at another university. I have correctly cited and acknowledged all my sources. Signed: ________________________________________________ Eric Kibet Morusoi Date: ________________________________________________ Supervisor: ________________________________________________ Professor Charles Manga Fombad Date: ________________________________________________ ii © University of Pretoria Dedication To my mother Elizabeth Cherono Koromicha -and- My son Immanuel Bethel Morusoi who was born while this research project was midway iii © University of Pretoria Acknowledgements Many people and institutions made valuable contributions towards the success of this project, and I am eternally indebted to them. It is difficult to name all of them for reasons of space. I will name only but a few. I am very thankful to my supervisor Professor Charles Manga Fombad who was patient and indefatigable in his oversight, and provided valuable guidance. He brought critical view and sharp intellectualism to his role. This in turn broadened my perspectives and helped me to refine this thesis. I would also like to thank all the members of the panel that interrogated my research proposal during its defence in July 2014. Special thanks go to the chair of the panel Professor Frans Viljoen, and Professor Jonathan Klaaren for very useful insight and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Customary Law Jurisprudence from Kenyan Courts: Implications for Traditional Justice Systems Francis Kariuki*
    Customary Law Jurisprudence from Kenyan Courts: Implications for Traditional Justice Systems Francis Kariuki* Abstract For a long time, the jurisprudence emanating from Kenyan courts has treated African customary law as an inferior source of law in comparison to formal laws. Consequently, certain customary practices and traditions that can foster social justice and peaceful coexistence amongst communities such as traditional justice systems had not been formally recognized in law. However, the 2010 Constitution recognizes customary law and the use of traditional dispute resolution mechanisms in resolving disputes. It also protects the culture and other cultural expressions of the people. This recognition is important because of the close interlink between traditional justice systems and customary law. In this paper, an examination of previous court decisions dealing with customary law is attempted to glean courts approach to customary law in the past and whether it can influence the application of traditional justice systems in enhancing access to justice. The paper posits that the way courts have interpreted customary law since the advent of colonialism may be a barrier to the application of traditional justice systems. A need therefore arises for courts to develop a jurisprudence that is supportive of customary law and traditional justice systems. A change of mindset and perceptions amongst judges, lawyers and the wider citizenry towards customary law is required if traditional justice systems are to contribute to enhanced access to justice for communities in Kenya. 1.0 Introduction In Kenya, like in most other former African colonies, the legal system is pluralistic. The sources of law include the Constitutions, statutes, received laws, religious laws and customary laws.1 Prior to colonialism, indigenous African tribes applied their laws and customs in resolving conflicts and disputes, and this contributed to social cohesion and peaceful coexistence.
    [Show full text]
  • An Equal Right to Inherit? Women's Land Rights, Customary Law and Constitutional Reform in Tanzania
    An equal right to inherit? Women©s land rights, customary law and constitutional reform in Tanzania Article (Accepted Version) Dancer, Helen (2017) An equal right to inherit? Women's land rights, customary law and constitutional reform in Tanzania. Social and Legal Studies, 26 (3). pp. 291-310. ISSN 1461-7390 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/72576/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article.
    [Show full text]
  • Substantial Injustice: Why Kenyan Children Are Entitled to Counsel At
    33100-nyi_45-1 Sheet No. 148 Side A 03/18/2013 11:08:48 \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYI\45-1\nyi105.txt unknown Seq: 1 13-MAR-13 9:24 SUBSTANTIAL INJUSTICE: WHY KENYAN CHILDREN ARE ENTITLED TO COUNSEL AT STATE EXPENSE MADALYN K. WASILCZUK* INTRODUCTION ......................................... 291 R I. DELINEATING THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL AT STATE EXPENSE IN KENYA............................... 295 R II. THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN KENYA ................................... 303 R A. Domestic Sources of the Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law in Kenya ................ 303 R B. International Sources of the Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law in Kenya ................ 309 R III. WHY THE COURT SHOULD RECOGNIZE THAT ACCUSED CHILDREN HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL AT STATE EXPENSE........... 313 R A. The Severity of Charges Against Children ....... 314 R B. The Complexity of Cases Against Children ...... 318 R C. The Capacity of Accused Children To Adequately Defend Themselves ............................ 318 R IV. REALIZING THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL AT STATE EXPENSE FOR CHILDREN IN KENYA ................ 320 R A. The Right to Counsel as Part of a Comprehensive Juvenile Justice System ........................ 321 R 33100-nyi_45-1 Sheet No. 148 Side A 03/18/2013 11:08:48 B. Delivering Legal Aid Despite Resource Constraints .................................. 325 R CONCLUSION ........................................... 333 R INTRODUCTION Imagine a courtroom bustling with people. You squeeze your way past the throng in the hallway, holding your breath to * J.D. Candidate, New York University School of Law, 2013. I would like to thank Professor Philip Alston, Alice Huling, Lisa Sweat, Salona Lutchman, Rachael Young, and Ann Vodhanel Preis for their helpful comments and guidance on early drafts of this Note.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Lady Justice Joyce Aluoch, Ebs, Cbs
    RESUMÊ LADY JUSTICE JOYCE ALUOCH, EBS, CBS Former Judge and First Vice-President, International Criminal Court, The Hague. IMI-Certified Mediator, CEDR-Accredited. Mediator. RESUMÊ HON. LADY JUSTICE JOYCE ALUOCH, EBS, CBS Former Judge and First Vice-President, International Criminal Court (ICC), The Hague. IMI-Certified Mediator, CEDR-Accredited Mediator. HON. LADY JUSTICE JOYCE ALUOCH, EBS, CBS RESUMÊ LADY JUSTICE JOYCE ALUOCH, EBS, CBS Former Judge and First Vice-President, International Criminal Court, The Hague. IMI-Certified Mediator, CEDR-Accredited. Mediator. HON. LADY JUSTICE JOYCE ALUOCH, EBS, CBS PLACE OF BIRTH: Kenya GENDER/SEX: Female Marital Status: Married Contact Details: +254722327487 | Email: [email protected] Nairobi, Kenya. PERSONAL STATEMENT HON. LADY JUSTICE JOYCE ALUOCH, EBS, CBS RESUMÊ LADY JUSTICE JOYCE ALUOCH, EBS, CBS Former Judge and First Vice-President, International Criminal Court, The Hague. IMI-Certified Mediator, CEDR-Accredited. Mediator. Hon. Lady Justice Joyce Aluoch, EBS, CBS (Rtd), is a former Judge and First Vice President of the International Criminal Court, at The Hague, The Netherlands. She is a lawyer and former judge of the High Court of Kenya. Hon. Lady Justice Joyce Aluoch is the First Chairperson of the Committee of African Union Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child and served as the Vice-Chairperson of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child from 2003 to 2009. She has also served as the inaugural head of the family division of the Kenyan High Court and a member of the Court of Appeal. As a legal professional, I have had a pivotal role in negotiations between the African Union and the Government of Sudan to ratify the African charter and secure the rights of children, pursued a fact-finding mission to war-torn northern Uganda on the effects of the war on children, and chaired a task-force aimed at handling sexual offences in Kenya through the implementation of the new Sexual Offences Act, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Appeal 68 of 2004
    Civil Appeal 68 of 2004 Case Number Civil Appeal 68 of 2004 Parties David Kiprugut & another v Peter Okebe Pango Case Class Civil Judges Philip Kiptoo Tunoi, Samuel Elikana Ondari Bosire, Emmanuel Okello O'Kubasu Advocates Mr. Kyalo for the Applicants. Mr. Mwangangi for the Respondent Case Action Judgment Appeal is allowed Award of Shs.1,552,000/= is set aside and it's substituted Case Outcome with KShs.776,000/= Date Delivered 30 Mar 2007 Court County Uasin Gishu Case Court Court of Appeal at Eldoret Court Division Civil IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT ELDORET CIVIL APPEAL 68 OF 2004 DAVID KIPRUGUT ………….………………….….... 1ST APPELLANT KENYA PIPELINE CO. LTD. ………………………… 2ND APPELLANT AND PETER OKEBE PANGO ………………...…..…..……… RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya Eldoret (Omonyi Tunya, J.) dated 1st November, 2002 in H.C.C.C. NO. 191 OF 2000) ********************* JUDGMENT OF THE COURT This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court (Omondi Tunya, J.) delivered at Eldoret on 1st November, 2002 in which the learned Judge awarded the respondent herein,Peter Okebe Pango (as the plaintiff in the superior court) a sum of Shs.1,552,000/= as general and special damages arising out of a traffic road accident in which the respondent sustained injuries. The respondent herein, Peter Okebe Pango, filed a suit against the appellants in the superior court. The pertinent paragraphs of the amended plaint were as follows:- “1. The plaintiff is a male adult of sound mind and his address of service for the purposes of this suit is care of KITIWA & COMPANY ADVOCATES, 1ST FLOOR, SIMPHI HOUSE, OLOO STREET, P.O.
    [Show full text]