DOCSLIB.ORG

Transpor T a T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transpor T a T ION T A T TRANSPOR 12-209 City of Maplewood Adopted September 9, 2019 Chapter 12 TRANSPORTATION The 2040 Comprehensive Plan’s Transportation Chapter is meant as a framework to guide the maintenance and development of road, transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the City of Maplewood. The Chapter is necessary to ensure that the City’s transportation system best accommodates the present and future mobility, access, and safety needs of Maplewood’s residents and visitors. The Chapter aims to position the City’s transportation system within a regional context, putting emphasis on the ability of neighborhoods to attract new families, the capacity of business districts to attract new companies, and the ability of residents to access employment centers through a variety of transportation options. Adopted September 9, 2019 2040 Comprehensive Plan 12-210 TRANSPORTATION Purpose This chapter is meant to While this plan is meant to guide transportation planning in the City of guide transportation planning Maplewood, it is also intended to fit strategically into the regional vision in the City of Maplewood laid out by the Metropolitan Council. Minnesota State law requires that the and fit strategically into the Council create regional plans and policies to guide growth and manage regional vision laid out by the regional systems for transportation, aviation, water resources, and regional Metropolitan Council. parks. The Metropolitan Council recently created the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP), which was adopted in January 2015. The TPP establishes a vision for the metro region over the next 20 years and provides detail about how this vision will be reached. As Maplewood looks into the future, public transit systems, such as METRO Gold Line and Rush Line1, and alternate modes of transportation, represent the biggest change to Maplewood’s transportation system. It will be critical that Maplewood’s transportation system evolves to incorporate and connect these new modes of travel to users, businesses, and the community. In order to accomplish this the City will need to evaluate all transportation projects through the lens of Maplewood’s Living Streets Policy. Ultimately, the content of the Maplewood Transportation Plan supports the policies and strategies outlined in the TPP that will help the region realize this vision in the coming decades. Future Land Use The City of Maplewood is projected to grow in employment, households, and Adopted in 2013, the City of Maplewood population over the coming decades. This growth shapes the City’s vision for Living Streets Policy serves as the guided future land use and assumptions about the nature and intensity of this City’s principal guide for evaluating and development. A detailed land use plan is presented in the Land Use Chapter implementing all multimodal transportation of the Comprehensive Plan update. improvement projects, including Forecast population, household, and employment growth for 2020, 2030, and reconstruction and new construction. The 2040 is shown in Table 12-1 on the next page. Forecast population for 2040 policy establishes the prominence of creating is shown in Figure 12-1 The City’s forecasted totals have been allocated by streets that are safe and accessible for traffic analysis zone (TAZ) based on this plan’s assumptions for guided future users of all ages, abilities, and modes of land use. All data is drawn from the Metropolitan Council. transportation, enhance natural resources, and promote livability and quality of life. Living Streets Policy goals include: » Encourage people to travel by walking or bicycling. » Enhance the safety and security of streets. » Create livable neighborhoods. » Maximize the infiltration of stormwater. » Improve the quality of stormwater runoff. » Enhance the urban forest. » Improve the aesthetics of streets within the community. 1 This plan refers to the planned transitway as Rush Line, but the name is anticipated » Reduce life cycle costs. to change to METRO Purple Line upon adoption into the Transportation Policy Plan. 12-211 City of Maplewood Adopted September 9, 2019 Figure 12-1. 2040 Forecasted Population for Maplewood by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) TRANSPOR T A T ION Adopted September 9, 2019 2040 Comprehensive Plan 12-212 Table 12-1. Forecasted Population, Household, and Employment Growth for 2020, 2030, and 2040 Households Population Employment TAZ (map label) 2010 2010 2010 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 (actual) (actual) (actual) 1802 205 227 250 270 612 587 629 682 4 1 0 0 1804 164 180 191 199 496 479 500 521 14 9 7 6 1805 148 154 154 148 367 342 332 327 87 112 128 146 1806 554 575 572 563 1,136 1,286 1,247 1,229 482 776 874 977 1807 0 38 101 142 0 83 212 293 1,592 2,276 2,808 3,317 1808 622 647 643 622 1,415 1,373 1,284 1,221 2,504 2,901 3,110 3,279 1809 384 418 447 462 985 941 985 1,030 682 782 820 847 1810 396 413 409 401 1,071 1,037 1,005 983 474 540 566 585 1815 311 339 360 376 803 892 936 989 157 163 190 220 1816 200 218 234 244 538 554 581 610 618 829 879 920 1817 575 628 672 631 1,165 1,208 1,276 1,343 670 774 1,050 1,328 1818 40 44 48 51 128 102 108 116 863 857 975 1,105 1823 821 919 943 802 2,148 2,315 2,262 2,200 202 252 273 292 1824 566 720 933 640 1,174 1,601 1,955 2,198 313 432 611 797 1825 35 37 38 37 302 310 317 323 759 744 790 827 1826 243 255 255 244 756 740 710 683 350 309 315 318 1827 174 185 191 188 438 465 458 454 490 587 742 879 1828 180 198 219 240 518 503 532 571 135 127 193 273 1829 219 292 370 445 575 740 894 1,059 74 83 110 137 1830 369 470 539 580 993 1,183 1,300 1,180 51 8 23 41 1831 383 409 427 438 981 1,029 1,026 1,036 221 231 323 420 1832 223 237 244 245 614 597 588 581 121 199 247 293 1833 124 166 217 245 261 416 520 577 288 334 388 443 1834 266 371 536 632 746 934 1,292 1,620 90 39 54 73 1835 355 457 536 593 847 1,151 1,292 1,407 18 81 94 104 1836 707 791 818 831 1,761 1,986 1,969 1,972 201 223 301 380 1837 369 406 437 458 1,070 1,050 1,074 1,105 60 95 149 207 1838 816 902 966 1,007 2,311 2,250 2,338 2,418 429 520 604 688 12-213 City of Maplewood Adopted September 9, 2019 Households Population Employment TAZ (map label) 2010 2010 2010 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 (actual) (actual) (actual) 1885 137 155 169 173 344 366 366 353 670 891 927 952 1886 276 303 326 340 798 774 797 707 118 69 83 95 1887 107 118 129 294 290 309 324 336 231 239 280 320 1984 53 59 63 67 152 124 129 135 13 16 19 21 1985 1,373 1,507 1,581 1,624 2,727 2,906 2,954 3,034 329 279 320 357 1986 418 449 467 478 1,104 1,094 1,101 1,121 133 172 180 186 1987 197 210 217 219 435 513 512 516 59 87 95 20 1988 213 229 240 1,246 546 577 583 2,780 13,387 15,950 15,451 14,800 1989 16 17 17 17 23 43 42 41 3 7 6 5 2103 414 464 509 541 1,066 1,266 1,357 1,438 179 189 235 279 2104 2 2 2 50 439 465 504 100 254 259 280 311 2110 980 1,035 1,040 1,033 2,221 2,615 2,587 2,583 222 142 163 195 2111 182 193 194 193 464 486 482 482 17 46 51 55 2112 537 569 573 571 1,605 1,466 1,456 1,457 9 19 23 26 TRANSPOR 2113 37 65 91 32 102 197 267 100 26 25 28 29 2114 421 722 972 642 1,321 2,226 2,869 1,700 26 25 29 32 2115 70 205 562 1,046 170 625 1,648 2,989 8 3 7 15 Totals T TAZ A 14,882 16,998 18,902 20,300 38,018 42,206 45,600 48,600 27,633 32,702 34,801 36,600 Allocation T System ION 17,000 18,900 20,300 42,200 45,600 48,600 32,700 34,800 36,600 Statement Adopted September 9, 2019 2040 Comprehensive Plan 12-214 Thrive MSP 2040 Community Designation The City of Maplewood has a community designation of Urban in the Thrive MSP 2040. As stated in Thrive, community designations are used by the Council to: » Guide regional growth and development to areas that have urban infrastructure in place and the capacity to accommodate development and redevelopment. » Establish land use expectations, including overall densities and Walking on the Fish Creek trail system in development patterns, for different community designations. Maplewood. » Outline the respective roles of the Council and the individual communities and strategies for planning for forecasted growth. As described in Chapter 1, urban communities like Maplewood developed in the second half of the 20th century as centers of office, commercial, institutional, and industrial uses.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Toolkit for a School Route Review
    PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION DEWCH I NI GERDDED I’R CYMRU YS GOL Toolkit for a School Route Review A step by step guide to running a School Route Review Help us create a walking nation We are Living Streets Cymru, part of the UK charity for everyday walking and the people behind the Walk to School Campaign. We’ve got a big ambition: that every child that can, walks to school. Useful links Run your own School Route Review livingstreets.org.uk/who-we-are/wales Advertise your event – download a poster to put up at school. Invite parents, Councillors and local residents – download template letters in Welsh or English. Living Streets - Walk to School livingstreets.org.uk/what-we-do/walk-to-school Living Streets - WOW Walking Challenge livingstreets.org.uk/what-we-do/projects/wow Living Streets - Park and Stride Guide livingstreets.org.uk/media/2035/park-and-stride-print.pdf Active Travel Act wales.gov.uk/active-travel Sustrans - Active Journeys sustrans.org.uk/active-journeys-school-wales The Daily Mile thedailymile.co.uk/ Keep Wales Tidy keepwalestidy.cymru If you would like this toolkit or further information by email please contact [email protected] Contents What is a School Route Review? 2 Why carry out a School Route Review? 3 Step 1 - getting ready to review 5 Classroom ideas Lesson plan Step 2 - walking the walk 11 Carrying out the School Route Review Step 3 - reporting the review 14 Case studies 16 Malpas Court Primary School - Newport St Mellons Church in Wales Primary School - Cardiff Nant-y-Parc Primary School - Caerphilly School Route Review Checklist 22 Poster 26 1 What is a School Route Review? A School Route Review is a great way of discovering some of the things that might stop families walking to school.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Streets and Alleyways – White Paper
    City of Ashland, Ashland Transportation System Plan Shared Streets and Alleyways – White Paper To: Jim Olson, City of Ashland Cc: Project Management Team From: Adrian Witte and Drew Meisel, Alta Planning + Design Date: February 2, 2011 Re: Task 7.1.O White Paper: “Shared Streets and Alleyways” - DRAFT Direction to the Planning Commission and Transportation Commission Five sets of white papers are being produced to present information on tools, opportunities, and potential strategies that could help Ashland become a nationwide leader as a green transportation community. Each white paper will present general information regarding a topic and then provide ideas on where and how that tool, strategy, and/or policy could be used within Ashland. You will have the opportunity to review the content of each white paper and share your thoughts, concerns, questions, and ideas in a joint Planning Commission/Transportation Commission meeting. Based on discussions at the meeting, the material in the white paper will be: 1) Revised and incorporated into the alternatives analysis for the draft TSP; or 2) Eliminated from consideration and excluded from the alternatives analysis. The overall intent of the white paper series is to explore opportunities and discuss the many possibilities for Ashland. Shared Streets Introduction Shared Streets aim to provide a better balance of the needs of all road users to improve safety, comfort, and livability. They are similar to European concepts such as the Dutch based ‘Woonerf’ and the United Kingdom’s ‘Home Zone’, with some distinct differences. This balance is accomplished through integration rather than segregation of users. By eschewing many of the traditional roadway treatments such as curbs, signs, and pavement markings, the distinction between modes is blurred.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Forest Lake 2040 Comprehensive Plan June 2018
    DRAFT City of Forest Lake 2040 Comprehensive Plan June 2018 Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Vision and Goals .................................................................................................... 1 Background/History of the Community ............................................................... 2 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................................... 3 Process ................................................................................................................... 3 Regional Setting .................................................................................................... 3 II. Land Use .............................................................................................................................. 6 Land Use Goals and Objectives ............................................................................. 6 Forecasts and Current Demographics .................................................................. 7 Existing Land Use ................................................................................................. 10 Future Land Use .................................................................................................. 15 Natural Resources ............................................................................................... 24 Special Resource Protection ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arterial Transitway Corridors Study Final Report
    Arterial Transitway Corridors Study April 2012 Prepared by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Connetics Transportation Group Luken Architecture CR Planning April 2012 Final Report i CONTENTS Table of Contents Introduction to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study ................................................................................................ 1 Why were these corridors selected for study? ......................................................................................................................................................2 What problems does the study address? (Purpose and Need) .........................................................................................................................3 What is Arterial Bus Rapid Transit? ........................................................................................................................................................................4 Study Goals and Objectives .....................................................................................................................................................................................5 What was studied in the ATCS?......................................................................................................................................... 7 Physical Concept Plans ............................................................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Rush Line Corridor Task Force Meeting February 18 at 4:30 P.M
    AGENDA Rush Line Corridor Task Force Meeting February 18 at 4:30 p.m. Virtual Meeting via Zoom Web access / call‐in instructions to be sent separately Item: Action Requested: Chair Victoria Reinhardt 1. Call to Order/Introductions Chair Victoria Reinhardt 2. Approval of the Agenda Approval Chair Victoria Reinhardt 3. Summary of July 23, 2020 Meeting Approval All 4. Member Updates Discussion Frank Alarcon, Ramsey County 5. State and Federal Legislative Update Information Public Works 6. 2021 Draft Workplan and Budget Andy Gitzlaff, Ramsey County Information Public Works Andy Gitzlaff, Ramsey County 7. Rush Line BRT Project Update Information Public Works Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13D.021 and 13D.04 Subd. 3, the Chair of the Rush Line Corridor Task Force has determined that an in‐person meeting is not practical or prudent because of the COVID‐19 pandemic and the declared state and local emergencies. Committee members will participate by telephone or other electronic means. In addition, it may not be feasible to have any committee members, staff or members of the public present at the regular meeting location due to the COVID‐19 pandemic and the declared emergencies. The meeting broadcast will be available online and a link to view the broadcast can be obtained by registering here. Members of the public and the media will be able to watch the public meeting live online. For questions related to this material, please contact Andy Gitzlaff at 651‐266‐2772 or [email protected]. Rush Line Corridor Task Force – February 18, 2021 1 Agenda Item #3 Rush Line Corridor Task Force Meeting July 23, 2020, 4:30 – 6:00 pm via ZOOM Draft Meeting Summary MEMBERS: Tom Fischer, Little Canada Councilmember Ben Montzka, Chisago County Commissioner John Mikrot, Pine County Commissioner D.
    [Show full text]
  • To Stop the Use of Property Intentionally
    Glossary of Planning Terms Access Management: Access picking fruit, feeding animals, or staying at management is the process of balancing a Bed & Breakfast on a farm. the competing needs of motor vehicle mobility and land access. Access Americans with Disabilities Act management provides access to land (ADA): A comprehensive, federal civil development while simultaneously rights law that prohibits discrimination on preserving the safe and efficient flow of the basis of disabilities in employment, traffic, including bicyclists and state and local government programs and pedestrians, on the roadway system. activities, public accommodations, transportation, and telecommunications. Accessory Dwelling Unit: An independent dwelling unit that is clearly Apartment: A dwelling unit used subordinate to a single-family detached exclusively for lease or rent as a residence. dwelling, as distinguished from a duplex or other two-family dwelling. It may be Archeological Resources: Places that internal or external to the main unit. have the potential to yield information about the past through study of the Adaptive Reuse: Rehabilitation or landscape and remains of previous human renovation of existing building(s) or intervention on the landscape. structures for any use(s) other than the present use(s). Architectural and Cultural Heritage: Places, people, objects, stories, traditions, Affordable Dwelling Unit: Refers to and ideas from and about the past that units required under the Affordable relate to us today. Dwelling Unit Ordinance, units are committed for a 30-year term as affordable Architectural and Historic Surveys: to households with incomes at 60 percent Studies of the properties within a or less of the area median income.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Rock1-4
    LA JOLLA HERMOSA La Jolla Hermosa Boulevard BACKGROUND This historic trolley car street has an unusual width for present day residential homes. Block lengths are very long in several areas, adding to potential for speeding. 6' 6’ 10’ 4' 10’ 6' 6' Residents are concerned with speed (31 mph in most ROW 50 Feet areas), and the wide crossing distances for pedestrians. Typical Cross Section Some spillover commercial and work center parking Bike Lanes affects residents. Refuge Islands V PHASE ONE Tree Wells Maintain full The Walkable Communities proposed plan includes access to all bike lanes. The southern portion can provide diagonal driveways parking on one or both sides of the roadway. Traffic volumes here are very low, and a narrower lane street section will create a quiet, peaceful atmosphere. Bike lanes should be dropped in this section, allowing more maneuvering width for bicyclists. A mini-roundabout is also recommended for Forward and La Jolla Hermosa for this phase. A mini-roundabout on La Jolla Hermosa and Colima can also be considered for this phase. Bike lanes should be 6.0 feet wide and marked with an outer stripe, 8.0 inches wide. Parking lanes should be marked with 4.0 inch stripes, and be 6.0 to 7.0 feet wide. Travel lanes should be narrowed to about 10.0 feet. This reduced visual width to travel lanes can reduce speeding by many drivers. It is common to see reductions of speed of 7.0 miles per hour. PHASE TWO OR THREE Refuge islands (short medians) and increased landscaping can be added in Phase Two.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Guidelines
    PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES Downtown Aberdeen 6 CHAPTER OUTLINE: OVERVIEW OVERVIEW These recommended guidelines originate from and adhere to national design standards as defined by the American SIDEWALKS AND Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO), WALKWAYS the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Federal Highway GREENWAY TRAIL Administration (FHWA) Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and the MARKED CROSSWALKS NCDOT. Another major source of information in this chapter is CURB RAMPS the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, found online at http://www.walkinginfo.org. Should the national standards be RAISED OR LOWERED revised in the future and result in discrepancies with this chapter, MEDIANS the national standards should prevail for all design decisions. A ADVANCE STOP BARS qualified engineer or landscape architect should be consulted for the most up to date and accurate cost estimates. BULB-OUTS PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS/ The sections below serve as an inventory of pedestrian UNDERPASS design elements/treatments and provide guidelines for their ROUNDABOUTS development. These treatments and design guidelines are important because they represent minimum standards for TRAFFIC SIGNALS creating a pedestrian-friendly, safe, accessible community. The PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS guidelines are not, however, a substitute for a more thorough evaluation by a landscape architect or engineer upon LANDSCAPING implementation of facility improvements. Some improvements may also require cooperation with the NCDOT for specific ROADWAY LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS design solutions. STREET FURNITURE AND WALKING ENVIRONMENT TRANSIT STOP TREATMENTS The Pedestrian and Bicyle Information Center, AASHTO, PEDESTRIAN SIGNS AND the MUTCD, nationally WAYFINDING recognized trail standards, BRIDGES and other sources have all informed the content of this TRAFFIC CALMING chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Access Restrictions: Liveable Streets, Play
    L E P T S HORT POLICY BRIEFS - 3 J u n e 2 0 1 9 CITIZENS AND NEIGHBOURHOODS vulnerable users, especially children. To reduce the impact they have on children’s ACCESS RESTRICTIONS: LIVEABLE STREETS, health, several boroughs have been PLAY STREETS AND SCHOOL STREETS implementing school streets, including Lewisham, Islington and Camden. EVIDENCE Hackney has published a guide for local authorities who wish to explore the - One in three children in the UK are growing possibility of implementing school streets. up in cities with unsafe levels of particulate Boroughs and UK public authorities can pollution (Unicef UK, 2017). implement the measure by using - Exposure to air pollution may be harming all experimental traffic orders, which allow organs of the body (Schraufnagel & al., parking authorities to modify traffic or 2019). parking regulations for an 18-months period - 63% of teachers would support a ban on requiring no prior public consultation: motor vehicles outside schools (Sustrans, consultation takes place alongside the trial, 2019). allowing for citizen feedback on the actual - Nearly a third of children ages 2-15 are effects of the scheme. There may be some overweight or obese (UK National public backlash, but results tend to be government, Childhood obesity action plan, positive in the long run, with high levels of 2017). acceptance once the scheme is in place. This was the case in the pilot led by CHALLENGE S Croydon. Changing the way streets are used to Expanding on school streets and in prioritise pedestrians and vulnerable partnership with Public Health England, road users by restricting motorised thirteen boroughs are experimenting with vehicle access to some streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Transportation Plan
    Active Transportation Plan nd 2 Edition Adopted by the Fridley Council February 11, 2020 Engineering Department Community Development Department February 2020 1 Introduction The City of Fridley is committed to providing residents with safe opportunities for walking, biking, and other non-automobile transportation. The Active Transportation Plan (the Plan) guides the City’s planning and construction of infrastructure needed for a well-maintained sidewalk and trail system. The 1st edition of the Plan was written in 2013 based on the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. In the following years, many of the Plan’s original goals have been achieved and a new 2040 Comprehensive Plan has been developed. This 2nd edition reflects the progress that has been made as well as the new Comprehensive Plan goals related to Active Transportation. Purpose This plan’s purpose is to guide the City’s installation and maintenance of infrastructure needed to achieve mobility equity and support opportunities for active transportation (walking, biking, assisted mobility, transit, etc.). It is well documented that increased walking and biking improves health and quality of life. Additionally, improved active transportation infrastructure can increase a community’s desirability, encourage higher spending at commercial establishments, and reduce crime. Shifting travel from vehicles to transit, bikes, and walkways also decreases the greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation, which is the largest contributor of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States according to the Environmental Protection Agency. In a city such as Fridley, where residents face many barriers to movement due to high- volume roadways and railways, a well-developed trail and sidewalk network is particularly important to increasing sense of place and community connection.
    [Show full text]
  • November 15, 2017 the Honorable Paul
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp November 15, 2017 The Honorable Paul Torkelson, Chair The Honorable Scott Newman, Chair House Transportation Finance Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 381 State Office Building 3105 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Linda Runbeck, Chair The Honorable Scott Dibble House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy Ranking Minority Member Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 417 State Office Building 2213 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Frank Hornstein, DFL Lead The Honorable Connie Bernardy, DFL Lead House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy 243 State Office Building Committee Saint Paul, MN 55155 253 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 RE: 2017 Guideway Status report Dear Legislators: The Minnesota Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Metropolitan Council, is pleased to provide the 2017 Guideway Status report as required under 2016 Minnesota Statutes 174.93, subdivision 2. This report updates information for eight guideway corridors currently in operation, construction or design, and thirteen more that are in planning or analysis phase, or that were at the time of the last report in 2015. The capacity analysis looks at regional guideway funding needs and resources related to capital, operations and capital maintenance for the next ten years. If you have specific questions about this report or want additional information, please contact MnDOT’s Brian Isaacson at [email protected] or at 651 234-7783; or, you can contact Met Council’s Cole Hiniker at [email protected] or at 651 602-1748.
    [Show full text]
  • School Street Closures and Traffic Displacement Project: a Literature Review with Semi-Structured Interviews 2
    School Street Closures and Traffic Displacement Project: A Literature Review with semi-structured interviews 2 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 4 Purpose, background and approach ....................................................................................................... 5 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Street closures – definition, development and context ................................................................... 5 Definition of road safety for the purposes of this review ................................................................ 6 Overall review inclusion criteria ...................................................................................................... 7 Study design .................................................................................................................................... 7 Dates ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Geography ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Search terms ................................................................................................................................... 7 Supplementation of
    [Show full text]