1962 1962 Additional Additional in in Evident

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1962 1962 Additional Additional in in Evident /~ ~~0t~ ~ ~ O G°3 ~9 ~ Q D o ~~d ~~e~~~ o~~~ ~~~s~~ t ~fi ~ ~~ i- .~.~y" x'~' y 9 g i ~. 1 ..~ fetters of ~ransmitta December 4, 1962 December 4, 1962 ROBERT B. BRADFORD EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of California State of California My Dear Governor: Dear Sir: It is a pleasure to submit to you the 16th Annual Report of Submitted herewith for your approval and transmittal to the Division of Highways, Department of Public Works. The Governor Edmund G. Brown is the ]6th Annual Report of the report presents an overall view of the California highway Division of Highways. program for fhe 1961-62 fiscal year, and gives a broad picture This report is prepared in compliancz with Section 143 of of the steady progress which is being made to improve motor the Streets and Highways Code and generally covers the fiscal vehicle transportation facilities for our rapidly growing popu- year ending June 30, 1962. Some later information on the lation. construction program is included, as is the State Highway The end of 1962 finds California first among the states in Budget for fiscal 1963-64 as adopted by the California High- many other respects as well as population. way Commission on October 19, 1962. One of the principal areas of California's pre-eminence is The fruits of long-range planning and orderly construction in providing modern, toll-free multilane dividzd highways. We on the state freeway and expressway system, including those now have nearly 2,600 miles of these facilities in operation and routes included. in the national systEm of interstate highways, an additional 350 miles under construction, most of the latter are becoming increasingly evident. In 1962 more than 150 new being of the fu{I freeway type. miles of full freeway were opened to traffic, an increase of This leadership in modern highway construction is the result about one-third over the freeways opened in 1961. More than of long-time leadership in highway planning, crystallized in 50 miles of freeway were opened in the Los Angeles district 1959 with the enactment of the 20-year freeway and express- alone, including the long-awaited downtown freeway loop. way system master plan signed into law by you. More than More than 350 additional miles of freeway are under con- half of the route location mileage for this 12,400-mile system, struction. which includes California's 2,178-mile portion of the interstate At the same time construction is proceeding on other high- system, has now been adopted by the California Highway way improvements throughout the State, as rapidity as avail- Commission. able funds permit, in a continuing effort to attain a balanced EfFective planning is being continued and strengthened. program of meeting traffic needs. State-local co-operation is being emphasized in freeway Continuing the practice initiated in 1960, the text and illu- planning and design, including increasing attention to scenic strated portion of the annual report is again included in our and esthetic qualities as well as other community values. The bimonthly magazine, California Highways and Public Works. relatively few locations involving some appreciable degree of Financial statements, apportionment tables, contract statistics controversy may make headlines, but the vast majority of the and miscellaneous other data will be published separately in nearly 2,000 miles of routings adopted during the past four a Statistical Supplement. This supplement is available to inter- years have been worked out in harmony with local authorities. ested persons on request. Many of these sections have involved complex location prob- lems in urban areas. This continuing highway progress is paying huge dividends in safety as well as mobility. It is reliably estimated that our present completed mileage of full freeways is saving over 300 lives a year in California, on the basis of comparison with accident statistics for the inadequate transportation arteries J. C. WOMACK which the freeways have replaced. This saving of life and limb State Highway Engineer is one of our most significant accomplishments and, I know, the most gratifying to you personally. Respectfully, ~'~`'~ ROBERT B. BRADFOR7 Director of Public Works Califor~~a, Hig hwa Y s a.~d Public ~i~orks Official Journal of the Division of Highways, Department of Public Works, State of California Vol. 41 November-December 1962 Nos. 11-12 CONTENTS Page Departmental Organization Chart----__-_---_-_-__------_-_-_--___-__--_-_----_-_-_-- 2 California Highway Commission _________________- California Highways-1962 5 Operations ------------------------ -- - ---------------------------------------- ------- ---- — 21 Construction --- --------------- -------------------- ------------------------------ --- 21 Maintenance __________ 23 Materials and Research ------------------------------------------------------------------ 29 Equipment -- ----------------------------- -- ---- 34 Administration -------------------------------______ 37 Office Engineer ----------------------------------------- - ---- --- ---------------------- 37 County and Co-operative Projects ------__-_-__---_-_--------------__-_-__-----------__- 40 City and Co-operative Projects -__-_-___-___---_-_---_-----___-_------__-__--__-- 42 Service and Supply _ ________________________ 43 Management Analysis ------ - -------------------------------------------------------------- 44 Systems Research ________ ___ 44 Pl a n n i n g ------------------------ --- ---------------------------------------------------- 45 Advance Planning _ ______________________ 45 Photogrammetric Mapping and Aerial Photography __________________________ 46 Programs and Budgets - - - --------------------------------------------------------- 47 Design ___ 48 Traffic---- ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- - 50 FRONT COVER—Part of fhe freeway through Red- Highway Planning Su rveY -------------- ----- ----- ------------------- --------- 52 lands on U.S. 70-99 (Interstate 10) at fhe Cypress Bridges -----------__-_-_-_- 54 Avenue Undercrossing, completed in August 1962. The golden straw on the embankments provides ero- Bridge Planning ____ ____ 54 sion protection pending planting of trees, shrubs and Bridge Operations ____ 55 periwinkles. The palm frees were }ransplanted to their SpecialStudies ---------------------------------- ------ - -------- ----- -------------- 58 present location (photo by Robert Dunn). Bridge Office Engineering ------------------------------------------------------- 59 Special Projects ------------------- ---------------------- --- ----------------------- 59 State-Owned Toll Bridges --------------------------------------------------- -- 60 BACK COVER—Looking west along Carquinez Strait, Personnel and Public Information ---------_-__------_---------_-__--_-----_-__-----___--_-_ 62 with the new Benicia-Martinez Toll Bridge just west 62 of the movable-span Southern Pacific railway bridge Personnel ----------- ---- -- --- ---------------- - ------ - -------- ------------------- in foreground. Cify of Benicia at north end of bridge; Trai n i n J -------------------- ---- ----------------------------------------- 63 Carquinez Bridge in far background (photo by EmployeeSafety ---- - ----- ------- ---- ---------------- ---- -------------- 63 Robert Rose). Audio-Visual -- ------ -------------- ---- ---------- ---------------- --------- 65 Public Information ----- ---- -- ---------- ------------------------ ------------ - - 65 Right-of-Way - - - ----------- ---- - ---- ---- ------------------------ - - 67 Legal------ -- ------ - ----- --- --------- -- ---- - ---- - -- - - 69 Fiscal--- -- - -------------------------- - ---- - - --- - - ----------- - ---- 71 1962-63 Budget -------- ----- - - - -------- -- - --- 73 p ~~~ " ~ • ,, r~,N ~,~ , ;~, '~,~.A~ ~~ ~°'~a~ LESTER 5. ICORITZ, Editor ~ '~' ": ~ <~ ~ STEWART MITCHELL, Associate Editor JOF~N C. ROBINSON, Associate Editor K ~`~' ~~~-""" ~ „ WILLIAM R. CHANEY, Chief Photographer ~~~~ E~itora aro invited to uae information conieined herein and to request prints of any black and whlhe ~~ ~; " photographs. 't i', Address communications to: EDITOR, CALlFORtdle4 HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC V'JORKS ~b P. O. Box 1499 SACRAMENTO, CALIfORNIA .;~ ~ ,~, ~~ ~~ ~ ~.. 1 GOVERNOR 1 HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR MJferJ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS EX OFFICIO MEMBER AND CHAIRMAN CALIFORNIA CA LIFO RNIA HIGHWAY COMMISSION HIGHWAY COMMISSION ..nr~~.i DIVISION OF CONTRACTS STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER AND RIGHTS OF WAY (LEGAL DEPT. CHIEF OF DIVISION r:. n.w i. c DEPUTY STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER DEPUTY STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER DEPUTY STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS PLANNING C. f:. Rui. 1. ~. ~rn 'ERSONNELB PUBLIC INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION FISCAL OPERATIONS BRIDGES RIGHT OF WAY PLANNING Pw w. .ss ~a. MANAGEMENT STATEx Gn_ ASST. ASST. SITE xwv. Ed x_ CxIEF xi~xi OF Vnv nGExi nS5T. 5T4TE xnv_EdG0.. L. N. i:~ll~_ 1. I:. M.. N,kM ~.1. ~'x0.m11R 1.. II..,.. Y'. I!. I~...r PERSONNEL PUBLIC INFORNATION OFFICE ENGR. LIiY8t0UxiY ADMIN!STRnTION CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SPECIAL STUDIES PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PERSONU PAOJECT9 ACR.SYSTEM PLANNING ADVANCE PLANNING DESIGN. E~ OFFILEN ii 0 A OFFit ER 11 PRIN CIPnL HWY. ENG0., PRIN LiPn~ NWY. ENGP. PRIN LIPAI NIVT. ENGR. PRINCIPAL BR. ENGR. PPINCiaAL 0P. ENGR. CxiEF A'W nCENi nssi_CxiEi NW ~Iwia. S.nM1 PRiNCIPAI NWT. FNGR, n55i. AGENT PAiu CiPAI XWY. ENGR. PPINCiPgI XWY. ENGfl. R~I.r.O Fo.~i. II. 1'.. tl~~.n. J. k_Jn~~,~i iii :. t.. Y~~wY 1. 11. )~M1lx~rom ~. I.
Recommended publications
  • Burbank/Del Monte SNI Planning Area Boundary February 7, 2002 %
    Burbank/DelBurbank/Del MonteMonte SNISNI PlanningPlanning AreaArea AVE TAMARACK UNIVERSITY WAY FREMONT BEL-AIR LIBRARYLIBRARY AVE THETHETHE ALAMEDA ALAMEDAALAMEDA DELMAS SEQUOIA (STATE ROUTE 82) THETHETHE ALAMEDA ALAMEDAALAMEDA AVE ALAMEDA THE BUSH CLEAVES WILSON SINGLETARY SUNOL ATLAS S KEEBLE AVE S MORRISON STOVER HOOVERHOOVER WHITEWHITEWHITE WHITEWHITEWHITE HOOVERHOOVER RACE HOOVERHOOVER WHITEWHITEWHITE HADLEY TRACETRACE TRACETRACE TILLMAN AVE ST DR MCENERYMCENERY LAURELEI AVE MIDDLEMIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL HEDDING MIDDLEMIDDLE SCHOOLSCHOOL MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARYELEMENTARY CRANDALL ST DR PARKPARK CAHILL ST ST SCHOOLSCHOOL UNIVER AVE AVE SITY AVE HESTER AVE AVE DR BELLEROSE DR SHASTA STSTST MCALISTER AVE AVE GARLAND STSTST EMORY STSTST GENEVIEVE LN AVE ST AVE WW W SAN SAN SAN FERNANDO FERNANDO FERNANDO AVE WW W SAN SAN SAN FERNANDO FERNANDO FERNANDO AVE AVE ST (STATE ROUTE 87) TRACE AVE ST. LEO THE GREAT HANCHETT (PRIVATE) ST WOZ ST GARDEN DR SONOMA BELLEROSE MCDANIEL GIFFORD LAKEHOUSE S MORRISON S CALAVERAS W SAN FERNANDO ST AVE CLEAVES MARTIN ST NAGLEE AVE AVE OTTERSONST ST DANIEL AVE O'CONNOR DR LINCOLNLINCOLN LINCOLNLINCOLN LUTHER AVE ST SIERRA RANIER ST SENIORSENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL AVE SENIORSENIOR HIGHHIGH SCHOOLSCHOOL AVE FORESTFOREST BROOKLYN AVE WABASH AVE FLORENCE CIRO SALVO DI O'CONNOR RAMOS AVEAVE ST AVE EUGENE AVE WAY FORESTFOREST FORESTFOREST AVE WAY ST AVE POSA AVE JOSEFA CLARMAR AVE AVE AVE BOSTON AVE HESTER AVE AVE MONROE ST MONROE MARI REVEY ST. MARTIN OF TOURS AVE BIRD BIRD BIRD SHASTA AVEAVEBIRD BIRD BIRD YOSEMITENORTON
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Assessment for the Tonto National Forest
    4. Access and Travel Patterns This section examines historic and current factors affecting access patterns and transportation infrastructure within the four counties surrounding Tonto National Forest (TNF). The information gathered is intended to outline current and future trends in forest access as well as potential barriers to access encountered by various user groups. Primary sources of data on access and travel patterns for the state’s national forests include the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), the Arizona Department of Commerce (ADOC), and the circulation elements of individual county comprehensive plans. Indicators used to assess access and travel patterns include existing road networks and planned improvements, trends in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on major roadways, seasonal traffic flows, and county transportation planning priorities. Additional input on internal access issues has been sought directly from forest planning staff. Various sources of information for the area surrounding TNF cite the difficulty of transportation planning in the region given its vast geographic scale, population growth, pace of development, and constrained transportation funding. In an effort to respond effectively to such challenges, local and regional planning authorities stress the importance of linking transportation planning with preferred land uses. Data show that the area surrounding Tonto National Forest saw relatively large increases in VMT between 1990 and 2000, mirroring the region’s relatively strong population growth over the same period. Information gathered from the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and county comprehensive plans suggest that considerable improvements are currently scheduled for the region’s transportation network, particularly when compared to areas surrounding Arizona’s other national forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacant Manufacturing Building 3444 N Summit Drive Toledo, OH 43611 2 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY
    1 Vacant Manufacturing Building 3444 N Summit Drive Toledo, OH 43611 2 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY: BILL ROBERTSON COLE KOEPSELL Lic. # 403061 Lic. # 405304 770.672.5614 | DIRECT 770.672.5564 | DIRECT [email protected] [email protected] SOLOMON COLVIN III SCOTT REID Lic. # 205030 OH Lic. # BRKP.2020001224 770.744.4555 | DIRECT 949.942.6585 | DIRECT [email protected] [email protected] 1501 Johnson Ferry Road, Suite 200 Marietta, GA 30062 844.4.SIG.NNN www.SIGnnn.com In Cooperation With ParaSell, Inc., A Licensed Ohio Broker Lic. # REC.2020005946 BoR: Scott Reid – Lic. # BRKP.2020001224 3 SANDS INVESTMENT GROUP TABLE OF CONTENTS 04 06 11 INVESTMENT OVERVIEW PROPERTY OVERVIEW AREA OVERVIEW Investment Summary Property Images City Overview Investment Highlights Location, Aerial & Retail Maps Demographics © 2021 Sands Investment Group (SIG). The information contained in this ‘Offering Memorandum’, has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Sands Investment Group does not doubt its accuracy; however, Sands Investment Group makes no guarantee, representation or warranty about the accuracy contained herein. It is the responsibility of each individual to conduct thorough due diligence on any and all information that is passed on about the property to determine its accuracy and completeness. Any and all projections, market assumptions and cash flow analysis are used to help determine a potential overview on the property, however there is no guarantee or assurance these projections, market assumptions and cash flow analysis are subject to change with property and market conditions. Sands Investment Group encourages all potential interested buyers to seek advice from your tax, financial and legal advisors before making any real estate purchase and transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Traffic
    4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This chapter describes the existing traffic conditions of the EA Study Area and evaluates the potential envi- ronmental consequences of future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the pro- posed Housing Element Update, General Plan Consistency Update, and associated Zoning Ordinances amendments, together referred to as the “Plan Components” on transportation and traffic. A summary of the relevant regulatory setting and existing conditions is followed by a discussion of Plan Components and cumulative impacts. The chapter is based on the traffic analysis prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants dated March 8, 2013, herein referred to as “Traffic Study.” The future baseline traffic volumes have been developed from output of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) travel demand model run by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The travel demand associated with the Plan Components have been obtained from the C/CAG Model based upon the anticipated future land uses that have been developed resulting from the land use controls under Near-Term 2014 and 2035 condi- tions. The complete Traffic Study and technical appendices are included in Appendix F of this EA. A. Regulatory Framework 1. Federal Laws and Regulations a. Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the agency of the United States (U.S.) Department of Transportation (DOT) responsible for the federally-funded roadway system, including the interstate high- way network and portions of the primary State highway network, such as Interstate 280 (I-280). b. Americans with Disabilities Act The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to indi- viduals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Collections
    A. andersonii A. Gray SANTA CRUZ MANZANITA San Mateo Along Skyline Blvd. between Gulch Road and la Honda Rd. (A. regismontana?) Santa Cruz Along Empire Grade, about 2 miles north of its intersection with Alba Grade. Lat. N. 37° 07', Long. 122° 10' W. Altitude about 2550 feet. Santa Cruz Aong grade (summit) 0.8 mi nw Alba Road junction (2600 ft elev. above and nw of Ben Lomond (town)) - Empire Grade Santa Cruz Near Summit of Opal Creek Rd., Big Basin Redwood State Park. Santa Cruz Near intersection of Empire Grade and Alba Grade. ben Lomond Mountain. Santa Cruz Along China Grade, 0.2 miles NW of its intersection with the Big Basin-Saratoga Summit Rd. Santa Cruz Nisene Marks State Park, Aptos Creek watershed; under PG&E high-voltage transmission line on eastern rim of the creek canyon Santa Cruz Along Redwood Drive 1.5 miles up (north of) from Monte Toyon Santa Cruz Miller's Ranch, summit between Gilroy and Watsonville. Santa Cruz At junction of Alba Road and Empire Road Ben Lomond Ridge summit Santa Cruz Sandy ridges near Bonny Doon - Santa Cruz Mountains Santa Cruz 3 miles NW of Santa Cruz, on upper UC Santa Cruz campus, Marshall Fields Santa Cruz Mt. Madonna Road along summit of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Between Lands End and Manzanitas School. Lat. N. 37° 02', Long. 121° 45' W; elev. 2000 feet Monterey Moro Road, Prunedale (A. pajaroensis?) A. auriculata Eastw. MT. DIABLO MANZANITA Contra Costa Between two major cuts of Cowell Cement Company (w face of ridge) - Mount Diablo, Lime Ridge Contra Costa Immediately south of Nortonville; 37°57'N, 121°53'W Contra Costa Top Pine Canyon Ridge (s-facing slope between the two forks) - Mount Diablo, Emmons Canyon (off Stone Valley) Contra Costa Near fire trail which runs s from large spur (on meridian) heading into Sycamore Canyon - Mount Diablo, Inner Black Hills Contra Costa Off Summit Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Directions to Stevens
    Travel Directions to Stevens Hoboken is approximately one square mile in area and is located on the New Jersey bank of the Hudson River between the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels. By Public Transportation From New York Bus: Take NJ Transit Bus No. 126, or the Academy Bus, from the Port Authority Bus Terminal at 8th Ave. and 40th Street. The bus goes directly to Hoboken and travels down Washington Street. From New York City, buses stop on even numbered streets. Please exit at 8th Street for main campus or 6th Street for academic buildings and walk east across Washington Street. Subway: Take Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH) subway, marked Hoboken. Stations are located on 6th Avenue at 33rd, 23rd, 14th, and 9th Streets, and at Christopher and Hudson Streets. Once in Hoboken, take a local Washington Street bus, taxi or walk uptown to 6th Street and turn right (east) for the campus. Ferry: Take a NYWaterway ferry from Pier A at Battery Park, Pier 11 on Wall Street in Manhattan, the World Financial Center in Downtown Manhattan, or Pier 78 (week- ends only) at West 38th Street and 12th Avenue in Manhattan to the Hoboken South Terminal. From the Hoboken South Terminal take a local Washington Street bus, taxi or walk uptown to 6th Street and turn right (east) for the campus. Ferries from Pier 78 (everyday) also arrive at the Hoboken North Terminal (13th Street). From the Hoboken North Terminal take a local Washington Street bus, taxi or walk downtown to 8th Street and turn left (east) for the campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Restriction Information: Table 4
    R17-6-412, Table 4 – Updated April 06, 2021 Table 4. Permanent Highway Restrictions, Requirements, Conditions, and Allowances For “Transport Subject To” requirements see end of document. Route Restriction Location Transport Subject to: Height Length Width Weight (in lbs) (MP = Milepost) Escort requirements: F = front escort, R = rear escort, F/R = front and rear escort, and LE = law enforcement escort Interstate 8 MP 0.00 (California State R17-6-405; R17-6-406; Over 14’ - 16’ = R Line) to MP 21.06 (Dome R17-6-408; R17-6-409 Valley Road TI) Interstate 8 MP 21.06 Westbound (Dome R17-6-405; R17-6-406; 15’ 11” Over 14’ - 16’ = R Valley Road TI Underpass - R17-6-408; R17-6-409 Structure 1325) Interstate 8 MP 21.06 (Dome Valley R17-6-405; R17-6-406; Over 14’ - 16’ = R Road TI) to MP 30.80 R17-6-408; R17-6-409 (Avenue 29E - Wellton TI) Interstate 8 MP 30.80 Westbound R17-6-405; R17-6-406; 15’ 11” Over 14’ - 16’ = R (Avenue 29E - Wellton R17-6-408; R17-6-409 Underpass - Structure 1332) Interstate 8 MP 30.80 (Avenue 29E - R17-6-405; R17-6-406; Over 14’ - 16’ = R Wellton TI) to MP 144.55 R17-6-408; R17-6-409 (Vekol Valley Road TI) Interstate 8 MP 144.55 (Vekol Valley R17-6-405; R17-6-406; 15’ 11” Over 14’ - 16’ = R Road Underpass - Structure R17-6-408; R17-6-409 550) Interstate 8 MP 144.55 (Vekol Valley R17-6-405; R17-6-406; Over 14’ - 16’ = R Road TI) to MP 151.70 R17-6-408; R17-6-409 (Junction SR 84) Interstate 8 MP 151.70 Eastbound R17-6-405; R17-6-406; 15’ 10” Over 14’ - 16’ = R (Junction SR 84 Underpass - R17-6-408; R17-6-409 Structure 1063)
    [Show full text]
  • Green Sheet Summary
    Factual Report Camp 16 Incident Burnover And Fatal Vehicle Accident August 30, 2009 CA-LAC-09196997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Review of Team Process………………………………….……… 1 Team Roster……………………………………………….……… 3 Overview of Accident …………………………………………… 4 Sequence of Events………………………………………………. 6 Findings…………………………………………………………... 18 Witness List………………………………………………………. 24 Causal and Contributing Factors…………………………………. 27 Attachments Blue Sheet………………………………………………………… 31 Green Sheet……………………………………………………….. 35 Fire Behavior …………………………………………………….. 40 Topographic Fire Behavior Map…………………………………. 70 Orthostatic Fire Behavior Map…………………………………… 71 California Highway Patrol Multidisciplinary Accident Investigation Team Report………….. 73 Training Review Summary………………………………………. 77 LACoFD Personnel………………………………………. 78 CDCR Inmate Fire Fighters……………………………… 82 Safety Review Summary…………………………………………. 88 Scene Maps Topographic Map………………………………………… 93 Aerial with Road Map……………………………………. 94 Google Earth Elevated View Map……………………….. 95 Google Earth Depressed View Map……………………… 96 Times Burned Map……………………………………….. 97 Fire History Map…………………………………………. 98 Aerial Facility Map……………………………………….. 99 Aerial Vehicle Placement Map…………………………… 100 Report Photos……………………………………………………... 103 Large Scale Site Survey Diagram………………………………… 123 Small Scale Site Survey Diagram………………………………… 124 Glossary and Acronyms………………………………………….. 125 Foreword Fire Captain Ted Hall, Superintendent 16, and Fire Fighter Specialist Arnie Quinones, Foreman Crew 16-3, are two brother firefighters we shall never forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrologic Comparison of Cataclastic Rocks from Shallow and Deeper Crustal Levels Within the San Andreas Fault System of Southern California
    Petrologic Comparison of Cataclastic Rocks From Shallow and Deeper Crustal Levels Within the San Andreas Fault System of Southern California J. Lawford Anderson Robert H. Osborne Department of Geological Sciences University of Southern California USGS CONTRACT NO. 14-08-0001-17732 Supported by the EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM OPEN-FILE NO. 80-987 U.S. Geological Survey OPEN FILE REPORT This report was prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. I. INTRODUCTION Studies leading to earthquake prediction and control require not only a knowledge of the causes and mechanics of earthquakes, but also an understanding of the physical, compositional, and me­ chanical properties of the geologic system in which they occur. Presently, little has been written about the nature of cataclastic rocks within fault zones except that it is generally markedly dif­ ferent from rocks on either side of the fault; that it may be fault gouge, fault breccia, cataclasite, or mylonite; 1 and that it ori­ ginates from mechanical crushing of rocks and from varying degrees of secondary chemical and mineralogical alterations by fluids mov­ ing through the fault zone (Higgins, 1971). The authors have recently completed a study of cataclastic rocks along the present trace of the San Andreas (Anderson, et al, in press) and the findings are summarized below in the section "Cataclastic Rocks within the San Andreas Fault Zone of Southern California." Our present effort has been directed at the San Gabriel Fault (Figure 1 and Plate 1) which as a deeply eroded precursor to the present San Andreas may provide intrafault mate­ rial representative of deeper crustal levels.
    [Show full text]
  • National Hazardous Materials Route Registry (March 31, 2021)
    32306 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 115 / Thursday, June 17, 2021 / Notices under which such actions were taken Resource Conservation and Recovery Office hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., are described in the Environmental Act (RCRA) [42 U.S.C. 6901–6992(k)]. ET., Monday through Friday, except for Assessment (EA) approved on December 10. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Federal holidays. 17, 2020, in FHWA’s FONSI issued on Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 Legal Basis and Background May 26, 2021, and other documents in Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898, the project file. The EA, FONSI and Federal Actions to Address Paragraphs (a)(2) and (b) of section other project records are available by Environmental Justice in Minority 5112 of title 49 United States Code contacting FHWA or the Georgia Populations and Low Income (U.S.C.) permit States and Tribal Department of Transportation at the Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and governments to designate and limit addresses listed above. The EA and Enhancement of Cultural Resources; highway routes over which hazardous FONSI can also be reviewed and E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O. materials (HM) may be transported, downloaded from the project website at 13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175 provided the State or Tribal government https://majormobilityga.com/projects/ Consultation and Coordination with complies with standards prescribed by eastsideic/. Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514 the Secretary of Transportation (the This notice applies to all Federal Protection and Enhancement of Secretary) and meets publication agency decisions as of the issuance date Environmental Quality; E.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Arroyo Seco Habitat Enhancement Plan
    Upper Arroyo Seco Habitat Enhancement Plan Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California Prepared for City of Pasadena Department of Water and Power 100 North Garfield Avenue, Room N306 Pasadena, California 91109 Contact: Elisa Ventura, P.E. T: (626) 744-4465 Prepared by Psomas 225 South Lake Avenue, Suite 1000 Pasadena, California 91101 Contact: Marc Blain, Senior Project Manager/Biologist T: (626) 351-2000 F: (626) 351-2030 August 2019 Upper Arroyo Seco Habitat Enhancement Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Relevant Plans, Policies, and Regulations ................................................................... 3 2.1 Hahamongna Watershed Park Master Plan .......................................................... 3 2.2 Arroyo Seco Watershed Management and Restoration Plan ................................ 3 2.3 Angeles National Forest Land Management Plan ................................................. 3 2.4 USDA-FS Weed Management Strategy ................................................................ 4 2.5 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ...................................................... 4 2.6 One Arroyo Report ................................................................................................ 5 2.7 Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy .........................................................................
    [Show full text]