X Illustrations 16
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Defining Architectural Design Excellence Columbus Indiana
Defining Architectural Design Excellence Columbus Indiana 1 Searching for Definitions of Architectural Design Excellence in a Measuring World Defining Architectural Design Excellence 2012 AIA Committee on Design Conference Columbus, Indiana | April 12-15, 2012 “Great architecture is...a triple achievement. It is the solving of a concrete problem. It is the free expression of the architect himself. And it is an inspired and intuitive expression of the client.” J. Irwin Miller “Mediocrity is expensive.” J. Irwin Miller “I won’t try to define architectural design excellence, but I can discuss its value and strategy in Columbus, Indiana.” Will Miller Defining Architectural Design Excellence..............................................Columbus, Indiana 2012 AIA Committee on Design The AIA Committee on Design would like to acknowledge the following sponsors for their generous support of the 2012 AIA COD domestic conference in Columbus, Indiana. DIAMOND PARTNER GOLD PARTNER SILVER PARTNER PATRON DUNLAP & Company, Inc. AIA Indianapolis FORCE DESIGN, Inc. Jim Childress & Ann Thompson FORCE CONSTRUCTION Columbus Indiana Company, Inc. Architectural Archives www.columbusarchives.org REPP & MUNDT, Inc. General Contractors Costello Family Fund to Support the AIAS Chapter at Ball State University TAYLOR BROS. Construction Co., Inc. CSO Architects, Inc. www.csoinc.net Pentzer Printing, Inc. INDIANA UNIVERSITY CENTER for ART + DESIGN 3 Table of Contents Remarks from CONFERENCE SCHEDULE SITE VISITS DOWNTOWN FOOD/DINING Mike Mense, FAIA OPTIONAL TOURS/SITES -
Blueprintsvolume XXVII, No
blueprintsVolume XXVII, No. 1–2 NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM In Between: The Other Pieces of the Green Puzzle in this issue: HEALTHY Communities, GREEN Communities Word s ,Word s ,Word s Winter & Spring 2008/2009 The Lay of the Landscape Annual Report 2008 in this issue... 2 8 13 18 19 21 23 In Between: The Other Pieces of the Green Puzzle The exhibition Green Community calls attention to important aspects of sustainable design and planning that are sometimes overshadowed by eye-catching works of architecture. The environmental implications of transportation systems, public services, recreational spaces, and other elements of infrastructure must be carefully considered in order to create responsible and livable communities. This issue of Blueprints focuses on the broad environmental imperative from the standpoints of public health, urban and town planning, and landscape architecture. Contents Healthy Communities, ! 2 Green Communities M Cardboard Reinvented Physician Howard Frumkin, of the Centers for Disease Cardboard: one person’s trash is another Control and Prevention, brings his diverse expertise as B an internist, an environmental and occupational health N person’s decorative sculpture, pen and pencil expert, and an epidemiologist to bear on the public health holder, vase, bowl, photo and business card holder, above: Beaverton Round, in suburban Portland, Oregon, was built as part of the metropolitan area’s Transit-Oriented Development Program. implications of community design and planning. p Photo courtesy of the American Planning Association and Portland Metro. stress toy, or whatever you can imagine. Bring out your o Creating Sustainable Landscapes creativity with these durable, versatile, eco-friendly LIQUID h CARDBOARD vases that can be transformed into a myriad from the executive director 8 In an interview, landscape architect Len Hopper discusses s his profession’s inherent commitment to sustainability and of shapes for a variety of uses in your home. -
Saarinen Family Papers Ca. 1880-1989 5 Linear Ft
ARCHIVES Saarinen Family Papers ca. 1880-1989 5 linear ft. Acquisition Number: 1990-08 Acquisition: Gift of Robert S. and Ronald S. Swanson, 1989-1990. In 1988, Matthew Ginal donated copies of materials on Kleinhans to the Archives and these were incorporated into this collection. Access: Access to the collection is unrestricted Copyright: Copyright to this collection is held by the Cranbrook Educational Community, except for some of the Kleinhans materials (see specific folders). Preferred Citation: Saarinen Family Papers, Cranbrook Archives, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. Photographs: In Photograph Special File and Scrapbooks (Series VI) Audio/Video: 16 mm films are in Series VI, Box 10 Index: The correspondence series is indexed (see end of finding aid) Processing: Betsy Wagner; James Luzenski, 1991; Ryan Wieber, 1998 PROVENANCE Between December 1989 and September 1990, Ronald Saarinen Swanson and Robert Saarinen Swanson donated five lots of Saarinen and Swanson family papers to the Cranbrook Archives. The brothers’ gift included a core grouping of archival materials relating to Eliel, Loja, and Eero Saarinen that had been held by Loja Saarinen until her death and later by Pipsan Saarinen Swanson. This grouping of material constitutes the majority of the Saarinen Family papers. Materials relating to Pipsan Saarinen Swanson and her husband, J. Robert S. Swanson, were organized into the Swanson Family papers (1990-1). Other non-aligned Archives holdings pertaining to the Saarinens and Swansons were subsequently added to both collections. The inventories of the Swansons’ gift have been kept and can be consulted. Not all of the Saarinen Family papers were donated to Cranbrook. After Eliel’s death, Loja Saarinen donated a cache of his honorary degrees and awards, drawings, and photographs to the Museum of Finnish Architecture in Helsinki. -
The Concept of the Architectural Corporation
1914 MICHAEL KUBO The Concept of the Architectural Corporation Despite the increasing presence of large, team-based offices within US architectural practice over the last century, a history of how architects and critics have understood these offices has yet to be written. The nature of group practice has changed from the big businesses and large organiza- tions that accompanied the merger movement at the turn of the twentieth century to the factory producers of the industrial expansion in the 1910s and 1920s, the bureaucratic firms of the postwar boom, and the multina- tional conglomerates of the neoliberal present. Only after World War II did the term “corporate” come to constitute a topos of architectural discourse, one that refers at once to a specific mode of production, the mentality of its producers, and the perceived qualities of the work produced. Through- out these changes in the scope of architectural organization, architects and historians have speculated on the implications of the large-scale office for the status of architecture as a business, a profession, and a field of cultural production. A convenient place to enter this history of critical reception is in midstream, in the years immediately after the World War II, when numerous authors looked to the largest firms of the early twentieth century to comprehend the implications of team-based practices for postwar architectural production. Among the earliest attempts was Henry-Russell Hitchcock’s 1947 article, “The Architecture of Bureaucracy and the Architecture of Genius,” in which he predicted that the major categories of 1983 postwar architecture would be distinguished not by style, but by economy of production.1 Hitchcock noted that the prewar terms of debate, centered Q on avant-garde themes of advance or regression, had given way to a Henry-Russell Hitchcock, “The Architecture of “clarification of the architectural picture” in which “it came about that there Bureaucracy and the was at last only one contemporary way of building,” namely modernism. -
ARCHIVES Maurice B. Allen Collection of Eero Saarinen and Associates Material 1954-1962 1.5 Linear Ft. Acquisition Number
ARCHIVES Maurice B. Allen Collection of Eero Saarinen and Associates Material 1954-1962 1.5 linear ft. Acquisition Number: 1996-34 Acquisition: Gift of Maurice B. Allen Access: Access to the collection is unrestricted Copyright: Copyright to this collection is held by the Cranbrook Educational Community Photographs: In Photograph Special File Processing: Ryan Wieber, 1996. Finding aid was updated in Nov 2004 by Leslie S. Edwards. History Maurice B. Allen was born in Lansing, MI and attended Western Michigan University and Notre Dame University before enlisting in the US Navy from 1944-1947. He graduated with a BA in Architecture from the University of Michigan in 1950. Upon graduation, Allen worked for Smith, Hinchman & Grylls before working for Eero Saarinen & Associates from 1952-1962. Significant projects include the GM Technical Center (Warren, MI), Yale University: Stiles and Morse Colleges and the Ingalls Hockey Rink, Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts in New York, North Christian Church (Columbus, IN), and the U.S. Embassy in Oslo. In 1962, Allen joined TMP Associates as a principal and Vice President of Design and Planning. He was a member of the Environmental Arts Advisory Panel of the Michigan Council for the Arts. He taught design at the University of Michigan College of Architecture and Urban Planning. He has served on the AIA National Architecture for the Arts & Recreation Task Force (1982) and on AIA National Committee on Architecture for Justice. Scope and Content of Collection This collection contains items related to Eero Saarinen & Associates and projects undertaken by that firm, and consist primarily of published articles and project presentation portfolios. -
Frankfurt Rhine-Ruhr Metropole Berlin 2012
Frankfurt Rhine-Ruhr Metropole Berlin 2012 SATURDAY ICAM 16 CONFERENCE IS HOSTED BY: SEPTEMBER 1, 2012 Deutsches Architekturmuseum (DAm) Schaumainkai 43, 60596 Frankfurt Tel: +49 (0)69 212 36 706; Fax: +49 (0)69 212 36 386 www.dam-online.de Peter Cachola Schmal, Director [email protected]; mobile: +49 (0)170 85 95 840 Wolfgang Voigt, Deputy Director [email protected]; mobile: +49 (0)162 61 65 677 Inge Wolf, Head of Archive [email protected] Peter Körner [email protected]; mobile: +49 (0)177 78 88 869 MUseUM FÜR ArchitektUR Und INGenieUrkUnst NRW (m:Ai) Leithestraße 33, 45886 Gelsenkirchen Tel: +49 (0)209 92 57 80; Fax: +49 (0)209 31 98 111 www.mai-nrw.de Dr. ursula kleefisch-Jobst, Director [email protected]; mobile: +49 (0)177 58 60 210 Peter Köddermann, Project Managment [email protected]; mobile: +49 (0)177 58 60 211 Akademie Der künste (AdK) Pariser Platz 4, 10117 Berlin Tel: +49 (0)30 20 05 70; Fax: +49 (0)30 20 05 71 702 www.adk.de Dr. eva-maria Barkhofen, Head of Architectural Archive [email protected]; mobile: +49 (0)176 46 686 386 OFFICIAL TRAVEL AGENCY: AGentUR ZeitsprUNG Kokerei Zollverein, Tor 3, Arendahlswiese, 45141 Essen Tel: +49 (0)201 28 95 80; Fax: +49 (0)201 28 95 818 www.zeitsprung-agentur.de Contact person: Anne Brosk [email protected]; mobile: +49 (0)179 51 64 504 2 SATURDAY SEPTEMBER 1, 2012 PRE-CONFERENCE TOUR DAM 13.00 – 17.00 REGISTRATION / MARKET PLACE 14.00 DEPARTURE BY BUS FROM THE DAM 14.20 – 15.30 FARBWERKE HOECHST ADMINISTRATION BUILDING by Peter Behrens, 1920 – 1924 With bridge and tower, the former administration building of the Hoechst AG is a master piece of expressionist architecture. -
Art in Architecture Acknowledgments
art in architecture Acknowledgments It is a pleasure to thank those who helped to make this exhibition a success. First and foremost, I would like to thank the Michigan Humanities Council, an affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities, whose generous support made this exhibition possible. I owe my deepest gratitude to the institutions from whose collections we borrowed objects for inclusion in this exhibition. My heartfelt thanks goes out to Leslie Edwards, Robbie Terman, and Laurie Kay at the Cranbrook Archives; Roberta Frey Gilboe at the Cranbrook Art Museum; David Schneider and Tracy Irwin at the Detroit Historical Museum; Jim Joyce at the Friedman Real Estate Group; Meredith Long at Meadow Brook Hall; and Jan Durecki at the Rabbi Leo M. Franklin Archives. Working with these individuals has been a joy and I truly appreciate all of the time and energy they spent preparing for the loan of these objects. Thank you also to the numerous archives, museums, historical societies and libraries throughout the state and the country who granted permission for the museum to use their photographs in the exhibition. Additionally, I would like to express my gratitude to the Flickr photographers who generously allowed the museum to include their photographs in the exhibition. It has been a pleasure to work with all of you. I wish to thank Tawny Ryan Nelb for her insightful essay that appears in this catalog. John Gallagher, Architecture Critic and Urban Development Writer at the Detroit Free Press, and Jennifer Baross, Partner, Destination Detroit Media, were gracious in accepting the museum’s invitation to give lectures during the course of the exhibition. -
Spring Volume 9 Number 1
Spring 1972 Volume 9 Number 1 Ramsey County History Published by the RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Editor: Virginia Brainard Kunz Contents Spring Old Federal Courts Building — Beautiful, Unique — Its Style 1972 of A rchitecture Faces Extinction Volume 9 By Eileen Michels................................. A Teacher Looks Back at PTA, 4-H — Number 1 And How a Frog in a Desk Drawer Became a Lesson in Biology By Alice Olson....................................... Forgotten Pioneers . XII....................... North St. Paul’s ‘Manufactories’ Come-back After 1893 Bust’ By Edward J. Lettermann..................... RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORY is published semi ON THE COVER: The Old Federal Courts Building, annually and copyrighted, 1972, by the Ramsey County viewed from across Rice Park about 1905. With the Historical Society, 2097 Larpenteur Avenue West, St. park itself, and the Minneapolis Public Library directly Paul, Minnesota. Membership in the Society carries across from it, the Old Federal Courts Building lends with it a subscription to Ramsey County History. Single a sense of community to the area. issues sell for $1.50. Correspondence concerning con tributions should be addressed to the editor. The Society assumes no responsibility for statements made by con tributors. Manuscripts and other editorial material are welcomed but no payment can be made for contribu ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The editor is indebted to tions. All articles and other editorial material submitted Eugene Becker and Dorothy Gimmestad of the Minne will be carefully read and published, if accepted, as sota Historical Society’s audio-visual staff for their help space permits. with the pictures used in this issue. 2 Old Federal Courts Building-- Beautiful, Unique-- OfArchitecture Faces Extinction By Eileen Michels UILT at a cost of nearly $2,500,000 B between 1892 and 1901, the United States Post Office, Court House and Customs House, known colloquially now as the Old Federal Courts Building, was the pride of downtown St. -
Martin-Elsaesser-Kirchen
Elisabeth Spitzbart S I M E Jörg Schilling S l u i B a „Wichtig ist nur, daß unsere Generation innerlich unab - s b N r a s t b k i hängig wird und aus Sachlichkeit und aus echter Gesin - 9 n e r 7 i t p E 8 nung heraus über ihre eigene religiöse Überzeugung h ❏ ❏ l t s i 3 S o a auch zu einer eigenen künstlerischen Anschauung und p n e 8 i s 0 s t Gestaltung kommt.“ s z p 3 Die Autoren e b r 0 r Martin Elsaesser 1919 e a . I I ( B i 0 r c c d K s t i 7 h h t u i b | 7 r t Elisabeth Spitzbart studierte Kunstgeschichte und r m b i c e J 8 c s h ö e h n ö 3 0 s r e Romanistik an den Universitäten Düsseldorf, Bonn und e g c t 1 e n h e h i . b S n 0 l t m l Stuttgart. Nach Abschluss der Dissertation über „Die c a e 8 e e h u e . d A … 2 i t n l Kirchenbauten von Martin Elsaesser“ (1989) arbeitete a 0 e l n … i Stadtpfarrkirche Stuttgart-Gaisburg, 1913 s S n n 1 z … i e B , 4 g sie als wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin und Hochschul - e Innenraum i P u E : g K Elisabeth Spitzbart | Jörg Schilling x f E c e a assistentin am Institut für Baugeschichte der TH Karls - o e h U , r n m p e r R t - r i ruhe (heute KIT). -
U.S. Post Office and Court House: Draft Nomination
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 U.S. POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE (JAMES R. BROWNING U.S. COURT OF APPEALS) Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: U.S. Post Office and Courthouse (James R. Browning U.S. Court of Appeals) Other Name/Site Number: 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 95-99 Seventh Street (Northeast Corner of Mission and Seventh Streets) Not for publication: City/Town: San Francisco Vicinity: San Francisco North State: CA County: San Francisco Code: 075 Zip Code: 94102 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: Building(s): X_ Public-Local: District: ___ Public-State: ___ Site: ___ Public-Federal: X Structure: ___ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 buildings sites structures objects Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form ((Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 U.S. POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE (JAMES R. BROWNING U.S. COURT OF APPEALS) Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Plaaces Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that tthis ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. -
First Presbyterian Church STREET & NUMBER
Form N(" 10-300 ,\0-1 "-' 1.'i\e\J· UNll ED STATES DEPARTtVIENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS Church Same STREET & NUMBER Northeast corner of Ann and Bow streets _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Fayetteville VICINITY OF 5th STATE CODE COUNTY CODE CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT _PUBLIC -.XOCCUPIED ---AGRICULTURE __ MUSEUM X-BUILDING(S) x...PRIVATE _UNOCCUPIED _COMMERCIAL _PARK __ STRUCTURE _BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS _EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ENTERTAINMENT K..RELlGIQUS __ OBJECT _IN PROCESS ..xYES:, RESTRICTED _GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED __ YES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL _ TRANSPORTATION _NO _MILITARY _OTHER: N.'~I"IE Clerk of Session, First Presbyterian Church STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. Cumberland County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY, To\J'jN STATE TITLE Historic American Buildings Survey DATE 1937 )(FEDERAL _STATE __COUNTY _LOCAL ,------------------------~------------------------------DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS • b f Ll rary 0 Con~,~sL---~--------~------------------------------____________ __ CiTY, TO'vVN STATE .J:Ja s Q.-tIlgj::..:o::;:..;n~.L __ __________ D. C • XEXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED X-ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD _RUINS ..xALTERED _MOVED DATE ____ _FAIR _UNEXPOSED The First Presbyterian Church, sited on a knoll above Cross Creek at the northeast corner of Bow and Ann streets in the center of Fayetteville, was constructed in 1832, incorporating parts of the brick walls of an earlier (1816) church that burned in 1831. The two-story gabled brick building, five bays wide and five wider bays deep, rests on a coursed sandstone foundation and is laid in Flemish bond. The chancel, portico, steeple and most of the interior woodwork are later additions and replacements The building's most significant feature is the wooden lattice truss roof especially designed for the church in 1832 by A. -
The ECB Main Building
Main Building November 2020 Contents 1 Overview 2 1.1 The commencement Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2 Project Milestones 8 1.3 Building Description 14 1.4 Site 19 1.5 Energy Design 27 1.6 Sustainability 29 1.7 Memorial 31 1.8 Photo Gallery Timeline (2004-2015) 34 2 Competition 35 2.1 Competition phases 37 2.2 Competition format 54 3 Planning Phase 56 3.1 Different planning phases 56 3.2 Optimisation phase 57 3.3 Preliminary planning phase 59 3.4 Detailed planning phase 60 3.5 Execution planning phase 62 4 Construction Phase 65 4.1 Preliminary works 65 4.2 Structural work 71 4.3 Façade 82 4.4 Landscape architecture 85 5 Appendix 87 Main Building – Contents 1 1 Overview 1.1 The project begins 1.1.1 A new home for the ECB Upon a recommendation by the European Court of Auditors to all European institutions that it is much more economical in the long term to own premises rather than to rent office space, the ECB built its own premises on the site of the Grossmarkthalle (Frankfurt’s former wholesale market hall). The premises were designed by Vienna-based architects COOP HIMMELB(L)AU. Figure 1 185 m high office tower Main Building – Overview 2 Figure 2 120,000 m² entire site area Figure 3 250 m long Grossmarkthalle 1.1.2 Choosing the location When the Maastricht Treaty was signed in 1992, it was decided that the ECB would be located in Frankfurt am Main. In 1998, when the ECB started operations in rented offices in the Eurotower, the search for a suitable site for its own premises in Frankfurt began.