Defining Architectural Design Excellence Columbus Indiana
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Michigan's Historic Preservation Plan
Michigan’s state historic Preservation Plan 2014–2019 Michigan’s state historic Preservation Plan 2014–2019 Governor Rick Snyder Kevin Elsenheimer, Executive Director, Michigan State Housing Development Authority Brian D. Conway, State Historic Preservation Officer Written by Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner, Michigan State Historic Preservation Office with assistance from Alan Levy and Kristine Kidorf Goaltrac, Inc. For more information on Michigan’s historic preservation programs visit michigan.gov/SHPo. The National Park Service (NPS), U. S. Department of the Interior, requires each State Historic Preservation Office to develop and publish a statewide historic preservation plan every five years. (Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual, Chapter 6, Section G) As required by NPS, Michigan’s Five-Year Historic Preservation Plan was developed with public input. The contents do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. The activity that is the subject of this project has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, through the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. However, the contents and opinions herein do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Michigan State Housing Development Authority, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products herein constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilita- tion Act of 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. -
Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate
For publication on or after Monday, March 29, 2010 Media Kit announcing the 2010 PritzKer architecture Prize Laureate This media kit consists of two booklets: one with text providing details of the laureate announcement, and a second booklet of photographs that are linked to downloadable high resolution images that may be used for printing in connection with the announcement of the Pritzker Architecture Prize. The photos of the Laureates and their works provided do not rep- resent a complete catalogue of their work, but rather a small sampling. Contents Previous Laureates of the Pritzker Prize ....................................................2 Media Release Announcing the 2010 Laureate ......................................3-5 Citation from Pritzker Jury ........................................................................6 Members of the Pritzker Jury ....................................................................7 About the Works of SANAA ...............................................................8-10 Fact Summary .....................................................................................11-17 About the Pritzker Medal ........................................................................18 2010 Ceremony Venue ......................................................................19-21 History of the Pritzker Prize ...............................................................22-24 Media contact The Hyatt Foundation phone: 310-273-8696 or Media Information Office 310-278-7372 Attn: Keith H. Walker fax: 310-273-6134 8802 Ashcroft Avenue e-mail: [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90048-2402 http:/www.pritzkerprize.com 1 P r e v i o u s L a u r e a t e s 1979 1995 Philip Johnson of the United States of America Tadao Ando of Japan presented at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. presented at the Grand Trianon and the Palace of Versailles, France 1996 1980 Luis Barragán of Mexico Rafael Moneo of Spain presented at the construction site of The Getty Center, presented at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. -
An Analysis of the 50-Year Rule, 1966-2010
Copyright by Emily Jeanne Koller 2011 The Report Committee for Emily Jeanne Koller Certifies that this is the approved version of the following report: Listed, Obliterated or Status Unknown: An Analysis of the 50-Year Rule, 1966-2010 APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Michael Holleran Monica Penick Listed, Obliterated or Status Unknown: An Analysis of the 50-Year Rule, 1966-2010 by Emily Jeanne Koller, B.A.; MA Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Community and Regional Planning The University of Texas at Austin May 2011 Abstract Listed, Obliterated or Status Unknown: An Analysis of the 50-Year Rule, 1966-2010 Emily Jeanne Koller, MSCRP The University of Texas at Austin, 2011 Supervisor: Michael Holleran The report evolves from previous work in the field that questions the efficacy of the 50-year rule, or criterion consideration G, of the National Register of Historic Places program to register and protect modern and recent past resources. Proponents of the recent past argue that by restricting evaluation of historic architecture to only that which is 50-years or older is leading to widespread endangerment and demolition of buildings and sites with periods of significance from the postwar era. This report studies the use of criterion G in-depth since the inception of the National Register program and attempts to identify and quantify the resources lost through continued adherence to the 50-year rule. The analysis is done in two parts. -
NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT 2003 Contents
NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT 2003 Contents 1 Message from the Chair The National Building Museum explores the world and the Executive Director we build for ourselves—from our homes, skyscrapers and public buildings to our parks, bridges and cities. 2 Exhibitions Through exhibitions, education programs and publications, the Museum seeks to educate the 12 Education public about American achievements in architecture, design, engineering, urban planning, and construction. 20 Museum Services The Museum is supported by contributions from 22 Development individuals, corporations, foundations, associations, and public agencies. The federal government oversees and maintains the Museum’s historic building. 24 Contributors 30 Financial Report 34 Volunteers and Staff cover / Looking Skyward in Atrium, Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Georgia, John Portman, 1967. Photograph by Michael Portman. Courtesy John Portman & Associates. From Up, Down, Across. NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT 2003 The 2003 Festival of the Building Arts drew the largest crowd for any single event in Museum history, with nearly 6,000 people coming to enjoy the free demonstrations “The National Building Museum is one of the and hands-on activities. (For more information on the festival, see most strikingly designed spaces in the District. page 16.) Photo by Liz Roll But it has a lot more to offer than nice sightlines. The Museum also offers hundreds of educational programs and lectures for all ages.” —Atlanta Business Chronicle, October 4, 2002 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR AND THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR responsibility they are taking in creating environmentally-friendly places. Other lecture programs, including a panel discus- sion with I.M. Pei and Leslie Robertson, appealed to diverse audiences. -
Blueprintsvolume XXVII, No
blueprintsVolume XXVII, No. 1–2 NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM In Between: The Other Pieces of the Green Puzzle in this issue: HEALTHY Communities, GREEN Communities Word s ,Word s ,Word s Winter & Spring 2008/2009 The Lay of the Landscape Annual Report 2008 in this issue... 2 8 13 18 19 21 23 In Between: The Other Pieces of the Green Puzzle The exhibition Green Community calls attention to important aspects of sustainable design and planning that are sometimes overshadowed by eye-catching works of architecture. The environmental implications of transportation systems, public services, recreational spaces, and other elements of infrastructure must be carefully considered in order to create responsible and livable communities. This issue of Blueprints focuses on the broad environmental imperative from the standpoints of public health, urban and town planning, and landscape architecture. Contents Healthy Communities, ! 2 Green Communities M Cardboard Reinvented Physician Howard Frumkin, of the Centers for Disease Cardboard: one person’s trash is another Control and Prevention, brings his diverse expertise as B an internist, an environmental and occupational health N person’s decorative sculpture, pen and pencil expert, and an epidemiologist to bear on the public health holder, vase, bowl, photo and business card holder, above: Beaverton Round, in suburban Portland, Oregon, was built as part of the metropolitan area’s Transit-Oriented Development Program. implications of community design and planning. p Photo courtesy of the American Planning Association and Portland Metro. stress toy, or whatever you can imagine. Bring out your o Creating Sustainable Landscapes creativity with these durable, versatile, eco-friendly LIQUID h CARDBOARD vases that can be transformed into a myriad from the executive director 8 In an interview, landscape architect Len Hopper discusses s his profession’s inherent commitment to sustainability and of shapes for a variety of uses in your home. -
New York, New York
EXPOSITION NEW YORK, NEW YORK Cinquante ans d’art, architecture, cinéma, performance, photographie et vidéo Du 14 juillet au 10 septembre 2006 Grimaldi Forum - Espace Ravel INTRODUCTION L’exposition « NEW YORK, NEW YORK » cinquante ans d’art, architecture, cinéma, performance, photographie et vidéo produite par le Grimaldi Forum Monaco, bénéficie du soutien de la Compagnie Monégasque de Banque (CMB), de SKYY Vodka by Campari, de l’Hôtel Métropole à Monte-Carlo et de Bentley Monaco. Commissariat : Lisa Dennison et Germano Celant Scénographie : Pierluigi Cerri (Studio Cerri & Associati, Milano) Renseignements pratiques • Grimaldi Forum : 10 avenue Princesse Grace, Monaco – Espace Ravel. • Horaires : Tous les jours de 10h00 à 20h00 et nocturne les jeudis de 10h00 à 22h00 • Billetterie Grimaldi Forum Tél. +377 99 99 3000 - Fax +377 99 99 3001 – E-mail : [email protected] et points FNAC • Site Internet : www.grimaldiforum.mc • Prix d’entrée : Plein tarif = 10 € Tarifs réduits : Groupes (+ 10 personnes) = 8 € - Etudiants (-25 ans sur présentation de la carte) = 6 € - Enfants (jusqu’à 11 ans) = gratuit • Catalogue de l’exposition (versions française et anglaise) Format : 24 x 28 cm, 560 pages avec 510 illustrations Une coédition SKIRA et GRIMALDI FORUM Auteurs : Germano Celant et Lisa Dennison N°ISBN 88-7624-850-1 ; dépôt légal = juillet 2006 Prix Public : 49 € Communication pour l’exposition : Hervé Zorgniotti – Tél. : 00 377 99 99 25 02 – [email protected] Nathalie Pinto – Tél. : 00 377 99 99 25 03 – [email protected] Contact pour les visuels : Nadège Basile Bruno - Tél. : 00 377 99 99 25 25 – [email protected] AUTOUR DE L’EXPOSITION… Grease Etes-vous partant pour une virée « blouson noir, gomina et look fifties» ? Si c’est le cas, ne manquez pas la plus spectaculaire comédie musicale de l’histoire du rock’n’roll : elle est annoncée au Grimaldi Forum Monaco, pour seulement une semaine et une seule, du 25 au 30 juillet. -
Oral History of Edward Charles Bassett
ORAL HISTORY OF EDWARD CHARLES BASSETT Interviewed by Betty J. Blum Compiled under the auspices of the Chicago Architects Oral History Project The Ernest R. Graham Study Center for Architectural Drawings Department of Architecture The Art Institute of Chicago Copyright © 1992 Revised Edition Copyright © 2006 The Art Institute of Chicago This manuscript is hereby made available to the public for research purposes only. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publication, are reserved to the Ryerson and Burnham Libraries of The Art Institute of Chicago. No part of this manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of The Art Institute of Chicago. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface iv Preface to Revised Edition v Outline of Topics vi Oral History 1 Selected References 149 Curriculum Vitae 150 Index of Names and Buildings 151 iii PREFACE On January 30, 31, and February 1, 1989, I met with Edward Charles Bassett in his home in Mill Valley, California, to record his memoirs. Retired now, "Chuck" has been the head of design of Skidmore, Owings and Merrill's San Francisco office from 1955-1981. Those twenty-six years were a time of unprecedented growth and change to which Chuck not only bore witness but helped shape. Chuck Bassett was one of the SOM triumvirate of the postwar years: he was the West Coast counterpart of Gordon Bunshaft in New York and William Hartmann in Chicago. In 1988 the California Council of the American Institute of Architects awarded SOM, San Francisco, a 42-year award for "...the genuine commitment that the firm has had to its city, to the profession and to both art and the business of architecture." Although Chuck prefers to be known as a team player, his personal contribution to this achievement is unmistakable in the context of urban San Francisco since 1955. -
Saarinen Family Papers Ca. 1880-1989 5 Linear Ft
ARCHIVES Saarinen Family Papers ca. 1880-1989 5 linear ft. Acquisition Number: 1990-08 Acquisition: Gift of Robert S. and Ronald S. Swanson, 1989-1990. In 1988, Matthew Ginal donated copies of materials on Kleinhans to the Archives and these were incorporated into this collection. Access: Access to the collection is unrestricted Copyright: Copyright to this collection is held by the Cranbrook Educational Community, except for some of the Kleinhans materials (see specific folders). Preferred Citation: Saarinen Family Papers, Cranbrook Archives, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. Photographs: In Photograph Special File and Scrapbooks (Series VI) Audio/Video: 16 mm films are in Series VI, Box 10 Index: The correspondence series is indexed (see end of finding aid) Processing: Betsy Wagner; James Luzenski, 1991; Ryan Wieber, 1998 PROVENANCE Between December 1989 and September 1990, Ronald Saarinen Swanson and Robert Saarinen Swanson donated five lots of Saarinen and Swanson family papers to the Cranbrook Archives. The brothers’ gift included a core grouping of archival materials relating to Eliel, Loja, and Eero Saarinen that had been held by Loja Saarinen until her death and later by Pipsan Saarinen Swanson. This grouping of material constitutes the majority of the Saarinen Family papers. Materials relating to Pipsan Saarinen Swanson and her husband, J. Robert S. Swanson, were organized into the Swanson Family papers (1990-1). Other non-aligned Archives holdings pertaining to the Saarinens and Swansons were subsequently added to both collections. The inventories of the Swansons’ gift have been kept and can be consulted. Not all of the Saarinen Family papers were donated to Cranbrook. After Eliel’s death, Loja Saarinen donated a cache of his honorary degrees and awards, drawings, and photographs to the Museum of Finnish Architecture in Helsinki. -
THE WESTFIELD LEADER the Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newgpaper in Union County YEAR—No
THE WESTFIELD LEADER The Leading And Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newgpaper In Union County YEAR—No. 1 Entered a» Second Clans Matter Published Post Office. Westfleld. K. 1 WESTFIELD, NEW JERSEY, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1956 Every Thursday 32 Page.—* CwU )elinquency Problem Is Registration For Adult Westfiety Public United Campaign jerious, Mayor Warns School Set For Monday School Enrollment Hits 6,000 Mark Children, Adults Registration night for the West- Goal Is $132,550 Responsibility Of field Adult School will be Monday Urged to Take from 7:30 to 9 p.m. in the cafe- Figures Reflect Salk Polio Series teria of the Roosevelt Junior High Increase of 537 You Have 2 More Parents Cited In School at 301 Clark street. Coun- Increase of 20 The Wwtfield Board of selors and instructors will be avail- Over Last Year Weeks to Register Heal tit today reminded resi- able to advise students in the se- Juvenile Control dent* th*t all re»trictio»« on ection of proper courses. Classes The largest enrollment in the There was a smart fellow Per Cent Over the use of privately purchased begin Oct. 1 and continue for ten history of the Westfield public called Morrie Tin seriousness of the juvenile polio vaccine have now be«n consecutive Monday nights ending schools was announced today by Who told his young brother i:»nuency problem was pointed removed. All age groups now Dec. 3. Superintendent of Schools Dr. S. named Lorrie: Last Year's Total today by Mayor H. Emerson are eligible to receive theae Booklets wen mailed out this N. -
The Concept of the Architectural Corporation
1914 MICHAEL KUBO The Concept of the Architectural Corporation Despite the increasing presence of large, team-based offices within US architectural practice over the last century, a history of how architects and critics have understood these offices has yet to be written. The nature of group practice has changed from the big businesses and large organiza- tions that accompanied the merger movement at the turn of the twentieth century to the factory producers of the industrial expansion in the 1910s and 1920s, the bureaucratic firms of the postwar boom, and the multina- tional conglomerates of the neoliberal present. Only after World War II did the term “corporate” come to constitute a topos of architectural discourse, one that refers at once to a specific mode of production, the mentality of its producers, and the perceived qualities of the work produced. Through- out these changes in the scope of architectural organization, architects and historians have speculated on the implications of the large-scale office for the status of architecture as a business, a profession, and a field of cultural production. A convenient place to enter this history of critical reception is in midstream, in the years immediately after the World War II, when numerous authors looked to the largest firms of the early twentieth century to comprehend the implications of team-based practices for postwar architectural production. Among the earliest attempts was Henry-Russell Hitchcock’s 1947 article, “The Architecture of Bureaucracy and the Architecture of Genius,” in which he predicted that the major categories of 1983 postwar architecture would be distinguished not by style, but by economy of production.1 Hitchcock noted that the prewar terms of debate, centered Q on avant-garde themes of advance or regression, had given way to a Henry-Russell Hitchcock, “The Architecture of “clarification of the architectural picture” in which “it came about that there Bureaucracy and the was at last only one contemporary way of building,” namely modernism. -
Rese a C R Hc Reach R C O F T H E 0 5
Architectural Research Centers Consortium THE REACH OF R E S E A R C H R 2 C 0 C 0 5 Spring Research Conference MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE, ART AND DESIGN - JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 2005 ARCC Spring Research Conference The Reach of Research i 2005 ARCC Spring Research Conference The Reach of Research 6 – 9 April 2005 College of Architecture, Art and Design Mississippi State University Jackson, Mississippi ii Published by: School of Architecture College of Architecture, Art + Design Mississippi State University P.O. Box AQ Mississippi State, MS 39762 www.sarc.msstate.edu No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission from the publisher, except in the context of reviews. ISBN # 000-9974588-1-4 Editors: James L. West David J. Perkes Anne H. Howell iii Architectural Research Centers Consortium Purpose and Mission Architectural Research Centers Consortium, Inc. is an international consortium committed to the expansion of the research culture and infrastructure in architecture, planning and related disciplines. Since its founding as a nonprofit corporation in 1976, ARCC has represented a concerned commitment to the improvement of the physical environment and the quality of life. As an organization of researchers and research centers, ARCC sponsors workshops, sustains networks and exchanges information and experiences intended to help build a research culture and infrastructure – in architecture schools and beyond. 2005 ARCC spring Research Conference The Reach of Research Conference Coordinators Jim West, Mississippi State University J. Brooke Harrington, Temple University David Perkes, Mississippi State University ARCC Officers and Board of Directors J. -
Architecture
February 8 OTHER WAYS OF DOING THINGS: ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN ACTIVISM Architecture: Shaping Buildings, Shaping Us Anya Sirota “We shape our buildings, and afterwards our buildings shape us.” Winston Churchill’s Anya Sirota is an Assistant Professor at the University of Michigan’s Taubman College of well-known quote is the starting point for our look at the relationship between architecture Architecture and Urban Planning. Her interdisciplinary research focuses on contemporary and our way of living. We start with the early 20th Century, when modern technology and cultural production and its relationship to architecture and urbanism. Sirota is principal of changing social/political relationships in Western Europe led to new thinking about the forms the award-winning design studio Akoaki and director of the Detroit-based Michigan and shapes of the built environment. WWII brought many of the most innovative European Architecture Prep program. She holds a Master in Architecture from Harvard’s Graduate designers to the United States. Michigan played a large, and underappreciated, role in the School of Design and a B.A. in Modern Culture and Media from Brown University. development of “Mid-Century Modern.” Stimulated by the auto industry, Scandinavian Speaker’s Synopsis: In the aftermath of Modernism’s perceived urban failures, a cadre of architects, and Americans like Frank Lloyd Wright, Michigan became the center for an organic architects is becoming increasingly aware that a building might not always be the best design philosophy that rejected the classical forms from ancient Greece and Rome. New solution to a spatial problem. The lecture will explore how certain practices are reinventing thinking in the design of furniture, buildings, and cities both reflected and encouraged the the architectural profession, replacing the model of the heroic visionary with a more changes in lifestyle that persist today.