Rail Ports: the Collaboration of Railroad & Coastal Steamboat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rail Ports: the Collaboration of Railroad & Coastal Steamboat University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2016 Rail Ports: The Collaboration of Railroad & Coastal Steamboat Companies in New England in the 1840s Laura K. Hoglund University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Hoglund, Laura K., "Rail Ports: The Collaboration of Railroad & Coastal Steamboat Companies in New England in the 1840s" (2016). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 855. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/855 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RAIL PORTS: THE COLLABORATION OF RAILROAD & COASTAL STEAMBOAT COMPANIES IN NEW ENGLAND IN THE 1840s BY LAURA K. HOGLUND A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2016 MASTER OF ARTS THESIS OF LAURA K. HOGLUND APPROVED: Thesis Committee: Major Professor Rod Mather Michael Honhart Kristine Bovy Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2016 ABSTRACT Prior to the development of railroad travel in New England, the primary mode of transportation was the stagecoach, a slow and uncomfortable vehicle. Steamboats traveled between coastal cities, but were more limited in their routes than stagecoaches and averaged the same amount of travel time. Desire for faster travel times, specifically between New York City and Boston, accelerated technological advancements that led to the development of a fledgling railroad network in New England by the second quarter of the nineteenth century. It also led to increased collaboration between railroad and steamboat companies, each offering combination routes to save time. The Long Island Railroad Company (LIRRC) was one of many railroad companies that took part in this transportation revolution. It was also one of many to experience financial hardship and one of the few to escape complete failure following the economic Panic of 1837. LIRRC trains departed Brooklyn and arrived in Greenport, at the northeastern end of Long Island, three hours later. Passengers then took a ferry across Long Island Sound to either Stonington or Norwich, Connecticut and then continued to Boston by railroad. This route was poised to cut travel time between New York and Boston nearly in half, but lasted only two and a half years. This study will examine the impact of financial hardship on the LIRRC’s quest to offer the fastest route between New York and Boston. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am extremely grateful to my major professor, Rod Mather, his guidance helped give this thesis direction and shape. And also to my committee members, Kristine Bovy and Michael Honhart, for their input from a perspective outside of maritime history. I would like to acknowledge my parents, Andy and Chris Hoglund, who supported me in one educational endeavour after another in the Midwest and New England. I would also like to acknowledge my grandmother, Mary Geraghty Hoglund, for encouraging my interest in history and imparting to me the grammatical wisdom of her years as a high school English teacher. Finally, I would like to thank Robert Ballard and Ken Marshall for authoring and illustrating Exploring the Titanic which book I read in the third grade at my elementary school library and which first sparked in me an interest in maritime history and specifically my interest in steamships. The narrative of the Titanic is an unyieldingly fascinating one that has now held my interest for 20 years with many more to come. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ...................................................................................... iv List of Figures ............................................................................................. v Introduction: The Past and Present of Transportation ................................ 1 A New Company: The Future of Transportation ......................................... 7 Business Plan & Stockholders ................................................................. 15 Relationship with the B&J ......................................................................... 21 Beginning Construction (1836-1840) ........................................................ 27 Finishing Construction (1840-1844) ......................................................... 35 Steamboats .............................................................................................. 42 Cornelius Vanderbilt ................................................................................. 48 Conclusion: Downfall ................................................................................ 55 Bibliographic Essay .................................................................................. 57 Bibliography ............................................................................................. 61 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Southern New England ............................................................... 6 Figure 2: Counties of Long Island (1832) ................................................. 12 Figure 3: Counties of Long Island (2016) ................................................. 12 Figure 4: David Bates Douglass ............................................................... 13 Figure 5: The Brooklyn & Jamaica section of the LIRR ............................ 13 Figure 6: Map showing the United States within North America ............... 14 Figure 7: Map showing New York State within the United States ............. 14 Figure 8: Map showing Long Island within New York State ...................... 14 Figure 9: LIRR Stock Certificate ............................................................... 20 Figure 10: Map showing the entire route of the LIRR ............................... 33 Figure 11: Topographic map of Long Island ............................................. 34 Figure 12: Valentine Hicks ....................................................................... 41 Figure 13: Map showing the LIRR’s steamboat connections .................... 46 Figure 14: Map showing Southern New England railroads....................... 47 Figure 15: Map showing the LIRR’s railroad connections ........................ 47 Figure 16: Cornelius Vanderbilt ................................................................ 54 Figure 17: List of members of the LIRRC’s Board of Directors (1845) ..... 55 Figure 18: Map showing route of Vanderbilt’s Independent Line .............. 56 v Introduction: The Past & Present of Transportation Traveling between Boston and New York City in the early-nineteenth century was a daunting task. It required a days-long commitment to travel and several interruptions along the way. In 1830, the fastest form of transportation in the eastern United States was the stagecoach. Three types of stagecoaches operated during this time: mail-only and mail and passenger, were both referred to as ‘mail coaches.’ The third type was passenger only or ‘accommodation’ coaches. Most accommodation coaches left their departure point early in the morning, traveled for between 12 and 17 hours, stopped at a tavern overnight, and left early the next morning for another long day of travel arriving at their destination on the evening of the second day. On longer trips a third day or partial day of travel was required. Most mail coaches, however, followed a different schedule. They usually left late at night, traveled all night, made stops along the way, and arrived at their destination on the morning of the third day. Return trips usually followed the same route in reverse stopping at most, if not all, of the same places.1 A typical stagecoach route between Boston and New York traveled through and stopped at several cities along the way including Worcester, Springfield, Providence, Hartford, New Haven, or New London (Figure 1). Each of these routes took over 24 hours to travel the entire distance of about 200 miles. One specific mail coach traveling between Boston and New York left Boston at 10pm, stopped in Worcester at 3:30am, Hartford at 1pm, New Haven at 8pm, and arrived in New York at 10am the 1 Badger and Porter, comp., Stage Register (Boston: Badger and Porter, 6 Sep 1825), 1-14; Badger and Porter, comp., Stage Register (Boston: Badger and Porter, 7 Mar 1826), 1-16; Badger and Porter, comp., Stage Register (Boston: Badger and Porter, 2 Mar 1830), 1-27. 1 following morning; 36 hours later. A Boston accommodation coach followed a similar route leaving Boston at 5am, arriving in Ashford, Connecticut in time “to sup and lodge,” departed Ashford at 5am the next morning, arrived in Hartford at 11am, and New Haven at 7pm in time to travel to New York by steamboat from New Haven.2 Even before the collaboration of railroad and coastal steamboat companies, similar arrangements existed with stagecoach companies. Looking at a stagecoach route listing for New England from the 1830s, it is clear that Boston and New York were the most important cities in the region. They were the hubs of travel for New England stagecoaches just as they continue to be hubs of travel today.3 Prior
Recommended publications
  • Long Island Rail Road Committee Monday, May 20, 2019
    Joint Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting June 2019 Joint Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 6/24/2019 8:30 - 10:00 AM ET 1. Public Comments Period 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 20, 2019 MNR Minutes MNR Minutes - Page 5 LIRR Minutes LIRR Minutes - Page 13 3. 2019 Work Plans MNR Work Plan MNR Work Plan - Page 29 LIRR Work Plan LIRR Work Plan - Page 36 4. AGENCY PRESIDENTS’/CHIEF’S REPORTS MNR Report MNR Safety Report MNR Safety Report - Page 43 LIRR Report LIRR Safety Report LIRR Safety Report - Page 46 MTA Capital Construction Report (None) MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 50 5. AGENCY ACTION ITEM MNR Action Item Westchester County DPW&T Fare Increase Westchester County DPW&T Fare Increase - Page 59 6. AGENCY INFORMATION ITEMS Joint Information Items LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update - Page 61 MNR Information Items Diversity/EEO Report – 1st Quarter 2019 Diversity/EEO Report - 1st Quarter 2019 - Page 85 June-July Schedule Change June-July Schedule Change - Page 101 Lease Agreement with Winfield Street Rye LLC for a Café and Cocktail Bar at the Rye Station Building Lease Agreement with Winfield Street Rye LLC for a Café and Cocktail Bar at the Rye Station Building - Page 105 Discussion on Future Capital Investments LIRR Information Items Diversity/EEO Report – 1st Quarter 2019 Diversity/EEO Report - 1st Quarter 2019 - Page 107 July Timetable & Trackwork Programs July Timetable and Trackwork Programs - Page 124 Lease Agreement for Riverhead Station Lease Agreement for Riverhead Station - Page 129 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the Long Island Rail Road Main Line Third Track
    The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the Long Island Rail Road Main Line Third Track Prepared for the Long Island Index by HR&A Advisors, Inc. and Parsons Brinckerhoff April 10, 2014 Transportation Investment and the Future of Long Island 3 The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Third Track on Long Island 20 Transportation Investment and the Future of Long Island HR&A Advisors, Inc. The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of LIRR Third Track | 3 The Long Island Index commissioned HR&A Advisors, Inc. and Parsons Brinkerhoff to study the economic and fiscal impacts of the Third Track project. HR&A Advisors, Inc. (“HR&A”) is a leading economic development consulting firm that specializes in conducting economic and fiscal impact studies on behalf of clients in the public and private sectors. HR&A has measured the economic and fiscal impacts of a diverse array of projects, places, and policies, including Access to the Region’s Core (ARC), the extension of LIRR to Lower Manhattan, The High Line, Times Square, and the New York State Film Production Credit. Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc. (“PB”) is a global planning and engineering firm with a leading practice in transportation forecasting, nationally and in the New York metropolitan region. PB developed the original 28-county regional Best Practices Model for the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council, and has performed all updates of the model, and has applied it for numerous travel forecasting studies in the region, including those for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. HR&A Advisors, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD NASSAU TOWER 71 MAIN STREET Mineola Nassau County New York
    LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD NASSAU TOWER 71 MAIN STREET Mineola Nassau County New York HABS LEVEL II – DOCUMENTATION FOR DEMOLITION PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED MEASURED DRAWINGS The Nassau Tower, August 14, 2018. NEW YORK STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Peebles Island Resource Center P.O. Box 189 Waterford, NY 12188 LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD, NASSAU TOWER SHPO PR No. 16PR03614 (Page 2) TABLE OF CONTENTS Index to Photographs & Documentation Maps ............................................................... 4 Photographs ..................................................................................................................... 8 Historic Narrative ............................................................................................................ 38 Part I. Historical Information A. Physical History................................................................................................... 40 B. Historical Context ................................................................................................ 41 Part II. Architectural Information A. General Statement 1. Architectural Character ................................................................................ 49 2. Condition of Fabric ...................................................................................... 49 B. Description of Exterior 1. Overall Dimensions ..................................................................................... 49 2. Foundations .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)
    NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) JUNE 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 COMMON GOALS AND THEMES................................................................................................... 2 2.1 | Goals Identification ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 | Theme Identification ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 | Gap Identification......................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Geographic Coverage......................................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Modal Coverage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Gaps in Coordination ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 2011 March 2011 the Next Meeting of LIST Will Be on Friday, March 18Th at 8:00Pm at the Christ Episcopal Church, South Carll Avenue and Prospect Street
    March 2011 March 2011 The next meeting of LIST will be on Friday, March 18th at 8:00pm at the Christ Episcopal Church, South Carll Avenue and Prospect Street, Babylon, New York. LAST MONTH: Last month, Ed Koehler presented a fantastic show on the NYO&W. Ed has prepared a fifty-five page illustrated handout on the New York, Ontario and Western. In order to get your copy please E-Mail him at [email protected]. THIS MONTH: Mark Sullivan will be doing the presentation. At press time we do not have the topic but we can assure you that the presentation will be a good one! IN THIS ISSUE: Page 2 LIST Order Form Page 3 LIST Happenings Page 4, 5 & 6 Stack Talk Page 7 Trip to Meadowlands Maintenance Complex Page 8 & 9 LIRR Modeler Pages 10 & 11 OBRM & RMLI Updates For regular updates and other important information, visit the Chapter website at: http://www.nrhs-list.org The Chapter mailing address is: LIST—NRHS P O Box 507 Babylon, New York 11702-0507 Page 2 March 2011 LIST Merchandise The following price list is for LIST Members ONLY! #_________ 2011 LIRR calendar @$8 each Total_________ #_________ 2010 Penn Station 100th Anniv. Calendar @$5 each Total_________ #_________ LIRR 175th Anniversary 60 page book @$10 each Total_________ #_________NY Connecting RR Book by Robert Sturm @$27 each Total_________ and William Thom #_________Babylon RR pins [Trolley drawing] @$3 each Total_________ #_________The Long Island Rail Road, In Color @$48 each Total_________ Volume 1 1949-1966 by Art Erdman #_________The Long Island Rail Road, In Color @$48 each Total_________ Volume 2 1966-1990 by Art Erdman #_________Penn Tech Society, “The Keystone” @$15 each Total_________ With the Ron Ziel Penn Sta.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of NEW YORK Office of the Inspector General Metropolitan
    STATE OF NEW YORK Office of the Inspector General Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to LIRR Service Disruptions, Winter 2007 Barry L. Kluger Inspector General Table of Contents Pages Structure of the Report ........................................................................................................ i Introduction ......................................................................................................................... ii PART I: Summary of OIG Findings and Response by LIRR Long Island Power Authority Infrastructure Concerns .................................................. 1 Communication Problems Identified ................................................................................. 2 LIRR Movement Bureau Needs Support .......................................................................... 6 Site Responders Need Clarity and Coordination .............................................................. 10 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 12 PART II: Response to LIRR Service Disruptions, Winter 2007 Downed LIPA Wires Cause Disruptions ............................................................................ 13 February 2, Valley Stream............................................................................................... 13 February 14, Seaford Station .......................................................................................... 20 February 20, Far Rockaway...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Rail Road: On-Time Performance by the Numbers
    Long Island Rail Road: On-Time Performance by the Numbers Report 1-2018 APRIL 2017 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Why Trains Are Late or Canceled ................................................................................ 3 Most Frequently Canceled Trains ................................................................................ 5 Longest Train Delays .................................................................................................... 6 Trains with the Worst On-Time Performance .............................................................. 7 Trains with the Best On-Time Performance ................................................................ 9 Pennsylvania Station................................................................................................... 11 Executive Summary The Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) is the largest commuter railroad in the nation. In 2016, the LIRR carried 89.3 million riders, the most since 1949. A total of 247,000 trains were scheduled, but some were canceled at the terminal before departing, terminated en route or were late arriving at their final destination. A commuter train is considered on time by the LIRR if it arrives within 5 minutes and 59 seconds of its scheduled arrival time. Thus, a train is considered late only if it arrives at its final destination 6 minutes or more after its scheduled arrival time. By this measure, only a relatively small percentage of the LIRR’s trains are late in any given year. However, many commuters have a different experience because of their route or time of travel. The LIRR’s on-time performance, which peaked at 95.2 percent in 2009, has slipped in Figure 1 recent years (see Figure 1). In 2015, on-time Annual On-Time Performance performance across the system averaged 91.6 percent, the lowest level in 16 years. 95% While performance improved in 2016 to reach 92.7 percent, it was still below the target (94 percent) set by the LIRR.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Forward a I L WAY Spring 2015
    EW YOR N & K ATLANTIC R Y A A ANACOSTIA IRL W A Moving Forward A I L WAY Spring 2015 News for customers, employees and friends of the New York & Atlantic Railway NY&A instrumental in clearing snow after storms On Monday, January 26, 2014, normally spread gravel ballast (bed New York Governor Andrew Cuomo for railroad tracks) and create drain- issued a state of emergency as Storm age ditches. However, the spreader can Juno hit Long Island with heavy snow, also serve as a snow plow. high winds and coastal flooding. Parts Due to continuous winds and of Long Island saw more than two feet drifting snow, there was a significant of snow. The Long Island Rail Road amount of snow that had to be cleared (LIRR), Metro-North Railroad and all several times. About 800 locomotive main roads were closed by 11 PM. The miles were operated over a three-day New York & Atlantic Railway tempo- period and, by mid-February, well over rarily ceased operations. 1,000 locomotive-miles were con- NY&A operations started again on sumed in this snow removal service. Wednesday, January 28 and the rail- Immediately after the storm, the road was instrumental in clearing snow NY&A maintenance team cleared for the LIRR. NY&A crews helped ice and snow from the rails and at all reopen passenger and freight lines in switch points. “We had to dig out all central and eastern Long Island. the switches and worked with the train Two NY&A GP38-2 locomotives crews to get to our customers to make NY&A 261 after a day of clearing snow and were used to push the LIRR’s Jordan sure there were no interruptions in ser- ice.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Rail Road Map a Map of the Long Island Railroad
    B r i d Cross Sound Ferry g e p o (Orient Point, LI- r t & New London, Conn) P Greenport o r North Ferry Co. t J e (Greenport-Shelter Island) f f e r s o Southold n South Ferry Co. S (North Haven- Long Island Rail Road t e a Shelter Island) Montauk d m u n s o h S i p d C n o l a . Key I s Mattituck g Amagansett o n East Hampton Full Time rail station L Peconic Port Jefferson Bridgehampton Accessible station Bay Stony Brook Part Time rail station Riverhead PORT JEFFERSON BRANCH Southampton Kings Park Major Transit Hub St. James Hampton Bays Locust Valley Northport MONTAUK BRANCH © 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Authority Oyster Bay Glen Cove Greenlawn Smithtown SUFFOLK Westhampton Glen Street OYSTER BAY BRANCH Huntington Speonk Port Sea Cliff RONKONKOMA BRANCH Yaphank Washington Cold Spring Harbor PORT WASHINGTON BRANCH Glen Head Medford Manhass Syosset Ronkonkoma G Plandome Greenvale Mastic-Shirley THE reat Neck et NA SSAU Central Islip BRONX Lit Bellport Dougltle Neck Roslyn Brentwood Fl N N M ushi Aubur Patchogue A B B et Murray a aston Albertson Hicksville Great Oakdale T s ng–Ma roadw Deer Park -Wi ndal ysid River Davis Park T East Wyandanch ll Hil e e New Meri M Sayville Ferry Co. ets in St ay i Williston W neola Pinelawn Islip Point l F H llon Westbury NHA ood loral y B de Pk Farmingdale A s e A Carle Place Bethpage Bay Shore Sayville Ferry id QUEENS ller Park v M e Queens Service, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Railroad Contacts
    Appendix 10.4 - LIST OF RAILROAD CONTACTS RAILROAD (abbr.) ADDRESS PHONE NO. / E-Mail Adirondack Scenic Railway 315-724-0700 Adirondack Railway (ADRC) Preservation Society Note: NYSDOT owns the Remsen- Mr. William Branson, President Lake Placid Travel Corridor and Union Station leases it to ARPS who operates it as 321 Main Street ADRC. Utica, NY 13501 Albany Port Railroad Mr. Richard Stack, General (518)463-8679 Corporation (APRR) Manager [email protected] Port of Albany 101 Raft Street Albany, NY 12202 Amtrak (AMTK) See National Railroad Passenger Corporation Arcade and Attica Railroad Mr. George Ling, General (585) 492-3100 Corporation (ARA) Manager 278 Main Street Arcade, NY 14009 Mr. Ray Martel, General B & H Rail Corporation (BH) (585) 384-9169 Manager [email protected] 5769 Sweeteners Blvd Note: BH and WHYP are affiliates of Lakeville, NY 14480 LAL. Batten Kill Railroad Company, Mr. William Taber, President (518) 692-2160 Inc. (BKRR). 1 Elbow Street [email protected] Greenwich, NY 12834 Boston and Maine See Pan Am Railways Corporation (BM) Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, See Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. (BPRR) Incorporated Buffalo Southern Railway Mr. Albert Feasley, 716-992-4979 (BSOR) 8600 Depot Street [email protected] Eden, NY 14057 Canadian National Railway Ms. Karen Phillips, VP- 202-347-7816 (CN) Government Affairs [email protected] 601 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 500 North Building Washington, DC 20004 Canadian Pacific Railway See Delaware & Hudson (CP) Railway Catskill Mountain Railroad Mr. Harry Jameson 845-688-5553 Company, Inc. CMRR PO Box 404 [email protected] Phoenicia, NY 12464 Central New York Railroad See New York, Susquehanna & Corporation (CNYK) Western Railway Corporation Clarendon & Pittsford Railroad See Vermont Railway Systems Company (CLP) Consolidated Rail Corporation Government Relations 215-209-5025 (CSAO) 1717 Arch Street, Suite 3210 Note: Conrail Shared Assets Philadelphia, PA 19103 Organization is owned by CSXT and NS and is operated as a switching railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Things You Should Know About the MTA's Commuter Railroads
    Policy Brief April 2018 Things You Should Know About 4 the MTA's Commuter Railroads By Jamison Dague n an average weekday more than 603,000 riders Otravel across the New York City region on one of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s (MTA) two commuter railroads—the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) and the Metro-North Railroad (Metro-North). Created separately as private railroads, the two have been incorporated into the MTA as part of the regional transit network; they now account for 28 percent of the MTA budget and are supported by taxpayers and the region's motorists. Here are four things New Yorkers should know about the MTA’s commuter railroads: 1 T A at o at commuter ailroads. The LIRR was chartered in 1834 and went through several expansions and consolidations before it was purchased by the Pennsylvania Railroad in 1900. Ridership soared following completion of tunnels connecting Queens to the newly built Penn Station. However, the rise of the automobile resulted in a decline in ridership. This decline, coupled with regulated fare structures and rising costs, created financial difficulties that led to the LIRR filing for bankruptcy in 1949. A series of state tax concessions and subsidies kept the LIRR afloat until the State eventually purchased the railroad in 1966. Metro-North is the result of the consolidation of several railroads and was ultimately part of the Penn Central merger in 1969.1 The trends in ridership, fare structure, and costs that hastened the LIRR’s financial collapse resulted in the Penn Central entering bankruptcy within two years of the merger.
    [Show full text]
  • System-Wide Implementation of Rail
    U.S. Deportment of Tro nsportotion Federal Railroad Administration FRA OFFICE OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & TECHNOLOGY RR 19-20 | October 2019 SYSTEM-WIDE IMPLEMENTATIONPLE NTAT Q, OF0 RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY INCURSIONcu S10 TREATMENTST E T product) to include safety warnings to drivers SUMMARY using its app at 20 crossings [2]. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Results indicated that those treatments had a Center (Volpe Center), under the direction of the significant positive effect on reducing ROW DOT Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) incursions by motor vehicles. The number of Office of Research, Development and incidents involving trains striking vehicles on the Technology (RD&T), conducted a study to tracks was reduced from two over the 1-year evaluate the effectiveness of engineering period before the treatments’ implementation to treatments to deter vehicles from turning onto a zero over the 1-year period after rail right-of-way (ROW) at highway-rail grade implementation. Additionally, the number of crossings. The goal of the treatments is to reports of vehicles on tracks was reduced by reduce the number of vehicles that mistakenly over 85 percent during the evaluation period. enter a ROW, thus reducing the possibility of an Also, the number of trains delayed was reduced incident with a train. by 86 percent, and the total train delay time decreased by about 89 percent over the From 2016 through 2018, the Volpe Center evaluation period. partnered with SunRail to develop, install, and evaluate promising vehicle ROW incursion prevention engineering treatments [1]. Following this demonstration project, in early 2018 the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) announced the LIRR Forward plan [2], which included the implementation of system-wide, high-visibility safety delineators and striping.
    [Show full text]