DOCSLIB.ORG

Stories of Stradbroke: Emotional Geographies of an Island in Transition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stories of Stradbroke: Emotional Geographies of an Island in Transition Stories of Stradbroke: Emotional Geographies of an Island in Transition Author Osborne, Natalie Published 2015 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith School of Environment DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3025 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365645 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Stories of Stradbroke: Emotional Geographies of an Island in Transition Natalie Osborne BUEP (Hons) (Griffith) Griffith School of Environment Griffith Sciences Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2014 WARNING TO READERS: Please be aware that this thesis contains names of people who have passed away, and images of people who may have since passed away. i Abstract Many cities, towns and communities in Australia are heavily reliant on the mining industry; mines provide well-paid, ‘family wage’ jobs and mining companies may invest in local social and community infrastructure and civil society organisations. However, this dependence may create vulnerability in those places and the impacts of the cessation of mining activities can be devastating. How such communities can effectively transition to a post-mining economy and a post-mining future is an increasingly urgent question. This critical phenomenological project draws from research on emotional geographies, island studies and collective trauma to explore lived experiences of a post-mining transition. It takes as its case study North Stradbroke Island/Minjerribah (Queensland, Australia), home of the Quandamooka Peoples and approximately 2,000 permanent residents (Indigenous and non-Indigenous). Specifically, it investigates the transition planning process on the Island that followed the State Government’s decision to expedite the closure of the Island’s sand mining industry. It explores the roles of place, history, context, shared identities, community, civil society, informal networks and structural power in shaping transition processes. Employing a storytelling approach to interviews, this project draws from the accounts of twenty-six participants to explore the emotional geographies of islandness. The complex, multi-faceted, and diverse set of relationships between people, place, and community — relationships for some which span millennia — was key to understanding the varied attitudes towards mining and to a post-mining transition, and the actions and experiences of individuals in the face of change. This research also considered the construction of lived experiences and of difference, and explored how those attitudes and actions were influenced by relationships to structural power. I found intimate relationships between place (in this case, islandness), histories, community, local knowledges, and shared identities in shaping responses to change and possibilities for the future. The emotional geographies of islandness, the effects it had on civil society, community, shared identities, and attitudes toward mining, tourism, and other forms of economic activity had a potent impact on transition planning. Civil society organisations ii and informal networks were mobilised in response to the mine closure decision — to oppose the decision and lobby for the continuation of mining, to organise involvement in transition planning, and to improve and expand upon the Queensland State Government’s official transition planning process. Their mobilisation highlights the critical importance of understanding emotional geographies when undertaking transition planning processes, and this work offers a methodological approach to effectively explore and express emotional geographies; one that may be readily adapted for use in other communities facing (post- mining) transitions. This research also found that during transition, communities — particularly close-knit communities with a shared identity — may be particularly vulnerable to collective trauma; that is, damage to the relationships, networks and identities that create ‘community’. Collective trauma presents a particular problem for transition planning, as effective transitions often rely on local actions organised and implemented through local networks and as such rely on a strong and relatively cohesive community. To explore this problem, this research draws on an understanding of the Island’s history and emotional geographies in order to understand the construction and experience of collective trauma. It considers how differences became divisions, the role of (mis)perceptions and misinformation in contributing to the conflict and damage and how conflict was connected to place and community dynamics, how ‘new’ collective trauma intersected with existing ones, and how the subsequent damage may be healed. Alongside the problem of collective trauma, it was also found that transitions offer an opportunity for engaging communities in a positive reimagining of their futures. Transitions may have transformative potential, and may offer a way to address existing inequalities and injustices, and to plan for and enact a more just future. iii Statement of Originality This work has not previously been submitted for a degree or diploma in any university. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the thesis itself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dr Matt Capp
    Contemporary Emerging Challenges let’s get practical ACCSSQ School Counsellors Annual Conference ┃ August 9 -10, 2018 ┃ Rydges, Southbank Rydges, ┃ 2018 -10, 9 August ┃ Conference Annual Counsellors School ACCSSQ ACCSSQ Conference Planning Committee 2018 Graham Thrupp, President [email protected] Mark Quinn, President [email protected] Joanne O’Bryan, Secretary [email protected] Jorge Ruiz, Treasurer [email protected] Maree Rose, Sponsorship [email protected] Anita Smith, BCEO [email protected] Barb Davies, Ex-officio President [email protected] Kate Day [email protected] Catherine Dennis [email protected] Joshua Laidler [email protected] Welcome The Association of Counsellors in Catholic Secondary Schools Queensland (ACCSSQ) is excited to welcome you to its 2018 Conference and to join with us as we engage with this year’s conference theme: “Contemporary Emerging Challenges - Let’s Get Practical” The landscapes of our lives in our society, communities, schools, and families shift, evolve and present us with challenges to address and work with. Our work in keeping pace with these and the developmental and pastoral needs of our students asks us to keep up with the fields applicable to Student Wellbeing. We know we can do much through our own reading and research. But, we also know we can do even more when we connect with similarly focussed colleagues and what better way is there to do so than at a conference such as this one! We have an exciting line up of speakers this year including: Dr Shannon Morton, Tony Ryan, Dr Paul Gibney, and many more.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciliationnews Issue No 30 // September 2014
    ReconciliationNews ISSUE NO 30 // September 2014 Rebecca Richards, Rhodes Scholar Top marks for a Coota boy The culture of mathematics 2 ISSUE NO 30 // September 2014 CONTENTS CEO’s message 3 From student to teacher 4 Two cool for schools This is likely to be my final message in Reconciliation News as I will soon be stepping down as CEO of Reconciliation Australia. I have absolutely enjoyed working here for the past four years and 7 Lourdes Hill shares the spirit it has been a privilege to share that time with a Board and staff so committed to the work we do. 8 Rebecca Richards, When I first took up my role, I said how honoured I was to be heading up an organisation that Rhodes Scholar matched my own values, and that is just as true today as it was then. The pathway to recognition and reconciliation is now engaging more Australians than ever before 10 The magic of mentoring and I am proud to have been a part of our key achievements over the past few years. We are now more dynamic and disciplined, our policy and people processes are more reflective of a 12 Top marks for a Coota boy social business and our programs including Reconciliation Action Plans, National Reconciliation Week and the Indigenous Governance Awards have all increased their reach and impact. 15 Students hit the right note We have significantly increased our profile and engagement across all sectors of society— 16 Walking the talk on Kokoda government, corporate, schools, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders and communities and non-Indigenous organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Fallacies and Examples Pdf
    10 fallacies and examples pdf Continue A: It is imperative that we promote adequate means to prevent degradation that would jeopardize the project. Man B: Do you think that just because you use big words makes you sound smart? Shut up, loser; You don't know what you're talking about. #2: Ad Populum: Ad Populum tries to prove the argument as correct simply because many people believe it is. Example: 80% of people are in favor of the death penalty, so the death penalty is moral. #3. Appeal to the body: In this erroneous argument, the author argues that his argument is correct because someone known or powerful supports it. Example: We need to change the age of drinking because Einstein believed that 18 was the right age of drinking. #4. Begging question: This happens when the author's premise and conclusion say the same thing. Example: Fashion magazines do not harm women's self-esteem because women's trust is not damaged after reading the magazine. #5. False dichotomy: This misconception is based on the assumption that there are only two possible solutions, so refuting one decision means that another solution should be used. It ignores other alternative solutions. Example: If you want better public schools, you should raise taxes. If you don't want to raise taxes, you can't have the best schools #6. Hasty Generalization: Hasty Generalization occurs when the initiator uses too small a sample size to support a broad generalization. Example: Sally couldn't find any cute clothes in the boutique and couldn't Maura, so there are no cute clothes in the boutique.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Schools Guide 2018
    A I N M O T E S U E M S U E D A I N R E V L A T N U O M SECONDARY SCHOOLS EDITION - BRISBANE - EDITION SCHOOLS SECONDARY CATHOLIC SCHOOLS GUIDE 2018 GUIDE SCHOOLS CATHOLIC C O S ’ L L E E C G N E E R U A L E R E C O Ω T D S Α F A C T E R E E E C I T S U J • E V O L • N R E C N O C Contents Catholic Schools Guide 'Acknowledged as the leading Guide to Catholic Secondary Education' Feature Editorial Feature Editorial Feature Editorial The Global Village Catholic Education in ACU and The Global the Global Village Village 8 9 10 Welcome to Catholic Schools Guide, 2018 edition. Each year, our Guide carries a different theme. This year, our theme is ‘The Global Village’. Feature Editorial Feature Editorial Feature Editorial Parents as First Hidden Costs of What does it mean to t a time when so many voices Brisbane Catholic Education; Augmented Reality Educators in the Education be part of a globalised A in this global world speak of Christian Zahra, Executive Director Speaking of phones, this year you Global Village Church? the exclusion of others, building of the National Catholic Education will find a few secret videos hidden both metaphoric and literal walls Commission; Michael Ondaatje, in this book that can be triggered on designed to prevent others from National Head of Arts, and your mobile device. How? Download entering, I feel passionate about Professor of History at Australian the free app called goAR and then taking a stand.
    [Show full text]
  • Fallaciesposter16x24.Pdf
    Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier Presuming that a real or perceived relationship between Manipulating an emotional response in place of a valid or Presuming a claim to be necessarily wrong because a to attack. things means that one is the cause of the other. compelling argument. fallacy has been committed. By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's Many people confuse correlation (things happening together or in sequence) Appeals to emotion include appeals to fear, envy, hatred, pity, guilt, and more. It is entirely possibly to make a claim that is false yet argue with logical argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, for causation (that one thing actually causes the other to happen). Sometimes Though a valid, and reasoned, argument may sometimes have an emotional coherency for that claim, just as is possible to make a claim that is true and but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine rational debate. correlation is coincidental, or it may be attributable to a common cause. aspect, one must be careful that emotion doesn’t obscure or replace reason. justify it with various fallacies and poor arguments. After Will said that we should put more money into health and education, Pointing to a fancy chart, Roger shows how temperatures have been rising over Luke didn’t want to eat his sheep’s brains with chopped liver and brussels Recognising that Amanda had committed a fallacy in arguing that we should Warren responded by saying that he was surprised that Will hates our country the past few centuries, whilst at the same time the numbers of pirates have sprouts, but his father told him to think about the poor, starving children in a eat healthy food because a nutritionist said it was popular, Alyse said we so much that he wants to leave it defenceless by cutting military spending.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irrational Atheist
    Praise for The Irrational Atheist “In a day when too few of the recently published ‘New Atheists’ get hoisted on their own petard, it is gratifying to see Vox Day undertake that assign- ment with warmth and enthusiasm.” —DOUGLAS WILSON , Christianity Today “Vox Day frags the New Atheism movement with the kind of logic and fact that Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens, and Onfray only claim to use. The impor- tant factor is that Day makes his challenging assertions without faith-based cross-waving.” —DR. JOHNNY WILSON , Editor-in-Chief, Computer Gaming World “The Vox is in the henhouse, with the scent of Dawkins’s blood in his nos- trils and a mouthful of Hitchens’s feathers! Harris, alas, doesn’t make it out of the book alive and the emergency team is still waiting to see if Dawkins will pull through after receiving one of the most visceral literary lobotomies ever inflicted in publishing. In the culture wars between New Atheism and The Rest of the World, The Irrational Atheist is ‘must-read’ material.” —IAN WISHART , Investigate Magazine “Day’s work is a healthy kick in the head to the comfortably numb. Using their own claims against them, he uses logic, reason, and rhetoric to reveal that atheists are the new fanatics, and that we should all—religious or ir- religious—be very wary of their schemes. G. K. Chesterton once remarked that without God, there would be no atheists; Day updates this by showing how atheism itself is an evolutionary dead-end. A provocative, gutsy, and in-your-face book, but eminently enjoyable reading.” —REA D MERCER SCHUCHAR D T , Assistant Professor of Communication, Wheaton College “In The Irrational Atheist, Vox Day plays the card that the atheists consid- er their trump—reason—against them in a devastating and highly enter- taining manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Thou Shall Not Commit Logical Fallacies
    Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier Presuming that a real or perceived relationship between Manipulating an emotional response in place of a valid Presuming a claim to be necessarily wrong because a to attack. things means that one is the cause of the other. or compelling argument. fallacy has been committed. By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's Many people confuse correlation (things happening together or in sequence) Appeals to emotion include appeals to fear, envy, hatred, pity, guilt, and more. It is entirely possible to make a claim that is false yet argue with logical argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, for causation (that one thing actually causes the other to happen). Sometimes Though a valid, and reasoned, argument may sometimes have an emotional coherency for that claim, just as it is possible to make a claim that is true and but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine rational debate. correlation is coincidental, or it may be attributable to a common cause. aspect, one must be careful that emotion doesn’t obscure or replace reason. justify it with various fallacies and poor arguments. After Will said that we should be nice to kittens because they’re fluy and Pointing to a fancy chart, Roger shows how temperatures have been rising over Luke didn’t want to eat his sheep brains with chopped liver and brussels Recognising that Amanda had committed a fallacy in arguing that we should cute, Bill says that Will is a mean jerk who wants to be mean to poor the past few centuries, whilst at the same time the numbers of pirates have sprouts, but his father told him to think about the poor, starving children in a eat healthy food because a nutritionist said it was popular, Alyse said we defenseless puppies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Field of Logical Reasoning
    The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments) Adapted from: An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments: Learn the lost art of making sense by Ali Almossawi *Not, by any stretch of the imagination, the only source on this topic… Disclaimer This is not the only (or even best) approach to thinking, examining, analyzing creating policy, positions or arguments. “Logic no more explains how we think than grammar explains how we speak.” M. Minsky Other Ways… • Logical Reasoning comes from Age-Old disciplines/practices of REASON. • But REASON is only ONE human characteristic • Other methods/processes are drawn from the strengths of other characteristics Other Human Characteristics: • John Ralston Saul (Unconscious Civilization, 1995) lists SIX Human Characteristics • They are (alphabetically, so as not to create a hierarchy): • Common Sense • Intuition • Creativity • Memory • Ethics • Reason Reason is not Superior • While this presentation focuses on the practices of REASON, it is necessary to actively engage our collective notions rooted in: • Common Sense (everyday understandings) • Creativity (new, novel approaches) • Ethics (relative moral high-ground) • Intuition (gut instinct) • Memory (history, stories) …in order to have a holistic/inclusive approach to reasonable doubt and public participation. However: • Given the west’s weakness for Reason and the relative dominance of Reason in public policy, we need to equip ourselves and understand its use and misuse. • Enter: The Field of Logical Reasoning vs. Logical Fallacy Appeal to Hypocrisy Defending an error in one's reasoning by pointing out that one's opponent has made the same error. What’s a Logical Fallacy? • ALL logical fallacies are a form of Non- Sequitur • Non sequitur, in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.
    [Show full text]
  • Accent Accent Is a Form of Fallacy Through Shifting Meaning. in This Case, the Meaning Is Changed by Altering Which Parts Of
    FALLACIES Accent Accent is a form of fallacy through shifting meaning. In this case, the meaning is changed by altering which parts of a statement are emphasized. For example: "We should not speak ill of our friends" and "We should not speak ill of our friends" Be particularly wary of this fallacy on the net, where it's easy to misread the emphasis of what's written. Ad hoc As mentioned earlier, there is a difference between argument and explanation. If we're interested in establishing A, and B is offered as evidence, the statement "A because B" is an argument. If we're trying to establish the truth of B, then "A because B" is not an argument, it's an explanation. The Ad Hoc fallacy is to give an after-the-fact explanation which doesn't apply to other situations. Often this ad hoc explanation will be dressed up to look like an argument. For example, if we assume that God treats all people equally, then the following is an ad hoc explanation: "I was healed from cancer." "Praise the Lord, then. He is your healer." "So, will He heal others who have cancer?" "Er... The ways of God are mysterious." Affirmation of the consequent This fallacy is an argument of the form "A implies B, B is true, therefore A is true." To understand why it is a fallacy, examine the truth table for this implication. Here's an example: "If the universe had been created by a supernatural being, we would see order and organization everywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • FAREWELL to AUNTY JOAN HENDRIKS on 26 January 2020 We Lost Aunty Joan - a Friend and Much Respected Ngugi Elder from Stradbroke Island
    1st Quarter 2020 COVID-19 Information inside FAREWELL TO AUNTY JOAN HENDRIKS On 26 January 2020 we lost Aunty Joan - a friend and much respected Ngugi Elder from Stradbroke Island. Pictured here with NATSICC Deputy Chairperson Shirley Quaresimin at the 2017 NATSICC retreat, Aunty Joan was a former Deputy Chair of the Council. Shirley puts it best when she says: “JOAN WAS A PROUD INDIGENOUS WOMAN AND ELDER OF HER PEOPLE, BUT ALSO A DEVOTED CATHOLIC. SHE PUT SO MUCH INTO WHAT NATSICC IS TODAY. MANY A NIGHT WE SPENT IN OUR HOTEL ROOM WORKING ON POLICY. SO GLAD TO HAVE SEEN HER ON HER COUNTRY ONE LAST TIME. JOAN YOU HAVE EARNED YOUR REST, REST NOW WITH YOUR GOD.” IN THIS ISSUE Chairperson’s Together in Spirit - COVID 19 INFORMATION 3 Message ST VINNIES RAP 6 We have endured an amazingly difficult start to COVID-19 and our Communities BELOVED AMAZONIA 8 the year so far. Obviously the Covid 19 situation is An unprecedented Pandemic that could have serious impacts on our totally new and challenging for everyone. We are communities, physical and mental health. ST IGNATIUS, GEELONG UNVEILS NEW all concerned for our people and our communities. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT PLAQUE 10 We are a strong people that have endured against the odds and we will draw upon our strength to YOUNG VOICE OF NATSICC 12 get though this also. NATSICC is trying to support YOUTH FESTIVAL PHOTOS 14 communities by distributing information and sending out toiletry bags for those that need to go ANZAC REFLECTION 17 to hospital. More information on these initiatives is included in this newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online
    Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online Discussions Saumya Yashmohini Sahai Oana Balalau The Ohio State University, USA Inria, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, France [email protected] [email protected] Roxana Horincar Thales Research & Technology, France [email protected] Abstract more appropriate. Fallacies are prevalent in public discourse. For example, The New York Times la- People debate on a variety of topics on online beled the tweets of Donald Trump between 2015 platforms such as Reddit, or Facebook. De- bates can be lengthy, with users exchanging and 2020 and found thousands of insults addressed a wealth of information and opinions. How- to his adversaries. If made in an argument, an in- ever, conversations do not always go smoothly, sult is an ad hominem fallacy: an attack on the and users sometimes engage in unsound argu- opponent rather than on their argument. In pri- mentation techniques to prove a claim. These vate conversations, other types of fallacies might techniques are called fallacies. Fallacies are be more prevalent, for example, appeal to tradition persuasive arguments that provide insufficient or appeal to nature. Appeal to tradition dismisses or incorrect evidence to support the claim. In calls to improve gender equality by stating that this paper, we study the most frequent falla- cies on Reddit, and we present them using “women have always occupied this place in soci- the pragma-dialectical theory of argumenta- ety”. Appeal to nature is often used to ignore calls tion. We construct a new annotated dataset of to be inclusive of the LGBTQ+ community by stat- fallacies, using user comments containing fal- ing “gender is binary”.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 a Great Big List of Fallacies
    Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense Appendix 1 A Great Big List of Fallacies To avoid falling for the "Intrinsic Value of Senseless Hard Work Fallacy" (see also "Reinventing the Wheel"), I began with Wikipedia's helpful divisions, list, and descriptions as a base (since Wikipedia articles aren't subject to copyright restrictions), but felt free to add new fallacies, and tweak a bit here and there if I felt further explanation was needed. If you don't understand a fallacy from the brief description below, consider Googling the name of the fallacy, or finding an article dedicated to the fallacy in Wikipedia. Consider the list representative rather than exhaustive. Informal fallacies These arguments are fallacious for reasons other than their structure or form (formal = the "form" of the argument). Thus, informal fallacies typically require an examination of the argument's content. • Argument from (personal) incredulity (aka - divine fallacy, appeal to common sense) – I cannot imagine how this could be true, therefore it must be false. • Argument from repetition (argumentum ad nauseam) – signifies that it has been discussed so extensively that nobody cares to discuss it anymore. • Argument from silence (argumentum e silentio) – the conclusion is based on the absence of evidence, rather than the existence of evidence. • Argument to moderation (false compromise, middle ground, fallacy of the mean, argumentum ad temperantiam) – assuming that the compromise between two positions is always correct. • Argumentum verbosium – See proof by verbosity, below. • (Shifting the) burden of proof (see – onus probandi) – I need not prove my claim, you must prove it is false. • Circular reasoning (circulus in demonstrando) – when the reasoner begins with (or assumes) what he or she is trying to end up with; sometimes called assuming the conclusion.
    [Show full text]