DOCSLIB.ORG

Tuesday, Nov. 17 | 6:15 P.M. Virtual Event for Tickets, Visit Squadup.Com/Events/Top-Women-Of-Law-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tuesday, Nov. 17 | 6:15 P.M. Virtual Event for Tickets, Visit Squadup.Com/Events/Top-Women-Of-Law-2020 2020 TUESDAY, NOV. 17 | 6:15 P.M. VIRTUAL EVENT FOR TICKETS, VISIT SQUADUP.COM/EVENTS/TOP-WOMEN-OF-LAW-2020 Scholarship Sponsor: Silver Sponsors: Supporting Sponsor: Celebration Sponsors: Toast to Trailblazers: B2 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly • Top Women of Law • November 16, 2020 Letter from the Publisher Dear readers, This special section honors Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly’s Top Women of Law for 2020, including our Circle of Excellence. This year’s Circle is made up of six women who have been honored in the past, but whose continuing achievements and contributions to the community merit additional recognition. All Top Women honorees, including the Circle of Excellence, were selected by a panel comprised of members of the legal community and representatives of Lawyers Weekly. The judges chose to honor individuals who have made signi�icant contributions to the legal profession while also serving as role models for young women entering the law. I’m also pleased to announce this year’s scholarship recipient, Kimberly Flores. Kimberly is a 2L at Boston University School of Law and the �irst member of her family to graduate from college. A public interest scholar, she serves as the 2L editor of the American Journal of Law & Medicine and as vice president of the Women of Color Collaborative at her law school. You’ll learn more about her in the pro�ile included in this section. I hope that you enjoy reading about the impressive women featured here. Susan A. Bocamazo, Esq. Publisher Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly 2020 Circle of Excellence Elizabeth L.B. Greene ................................................................... 17 Holly A. Harney ............................................................................ 18 Betty Francisco ................................................................................ 4 Maegan L. Hurley ......................................................................... 18 Grace V.B. Garcia ........................................................................... 4 Faith D. Kasparian ........................................................................ 18 Joan A. Lukey .................................................................................. 5 Aliya S. Khalidi ............................................................................. 19 Paige A. Scott Reed ......................................................................... 6 Julie E. Korostoff ........................................................................... 19 Anita P. Sharma .............................................................................. 6 Renee M. Landers ......................................................................... 20 Lisa M. Tittemore ........................................................................... 7 Chiara Urbani LaPlume ............................................................... 20 Sharon C. Lincoln ......................................................................... 20 2020 Top Women of Law Stephanie H. Massey .................................................................... 21 Maureen McBrien ........................................................................ 21 Nancy D. Adams ............................................................................. 9 Amanda McGrady Morrison ........................................................ 22 Marianne Ajemian .......................................................................... 9 Barbara A. O’Donnell .................................................................. 22 Kendra L. Berardi ......................................................................... 10 Karen O’Malley ............................................................................ 23 Inga S. Bernstein ........................................................................... 10 Rosa Liliana Palacios-Baldwin ...................................................... 23 Shahria H. Boston ......................................................................... 10 Jennifer L.R. Parent ...................................................................... 24 Elise Busny .................................................................................... 11 Lizette M. Pérez-Deisboeck .......................................................... 24 Ann Hetherwick Cahill ................................................................. 11 Demetra M. Pontisakos ................................................................. 25 Eugenia M. Carris ......................................................................... 12 Scarlett M. Rajbanshi ................................................................... 25 Gina D. Cash ................................................................................ 12 Whitney A. Reichel ....................................................................... 26 Laurie A. Cerveny ......................................................................... 12 Jennifer A. Rymarski ..................................................................... 26 Yvonne W. Chan ........................................................................... 13 Payal Salsburg ............................................................................... 26 Hemmie Chang............................................................................. 13 Regina Sam Penti .......................................................................... 27 Gabrielle Clemens ......................................................................... 13 Mary B. Strother ........................................................................... 27 Jennifer K. Crawford .................................................................... 14 Jennifer H. Suhl ............................................................................ 27 Kathleen R. Cruickshank ............................................................. 14 Michelle K. Tassinari .................................................................... 28 Deborah M. Danger ..................................................................... 15 Natacha Thomas ........................................................................... 28 Paula M. Devereaux ..................................................................... 15 Kimberly P. West ........................................................................... 29 Maria R. Durant ........................................................................... 16 Tamara S. Wolfson ........................................................................ 29 Alison K. Eggers ........................................................................... 16 April C. English ............................................................................ 16 2020 Scholarship Recipient Michelle A. Flores ......................................................................... 17 Ara B. Gershengorn ...................................................................... 17 Kimberly G. Flores........................................................................ 30 Published by Lawyers Weekly Inc., 40 Court St., 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02108. Photocopying and data processing storage of all or any part of this issue may not be Publisher Sales Executives made without prior written consent. Rates Susan A. Bocamazo, Esq. Elaine Fanning quoted on request. Copyright ©2020 Melanie Footer Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. Material Editor published herein is compiled at substantial Henriette Campagne Design Supervisor expense and is for the sole and exclusive Laura Black use of purchasers and subscribers. The Digital Editor Page Designer material may not be republished, resold, Matthew Cove Christian Edwin recorded, or used in any manner, in whole or in part, without the publisher’s explicit Advertising Director Ad Designer consent. Any infringement will be subject Scott Ziegler Michael Bertani to legal redress. Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly • Top Women of Law • November 16, 2020 • B3 C E I C RC N LE LE of EXCEL B4 • Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly • Top Women of Law • November 16, 2020 Betty Francisco C E I C General Counsel, Compass Working Capital, Boston RC N LE LE of EXCEL Northeastern University School of Law hroughout Betty building programs for families with low am constantly trying to champion and Francisco’s more than two incomes. open doors for others.” decade long legal career, “The role has been an amazing In 2012, she co-founded Latina she has taken the path less opportunity to do a lot of awesome Circle, aimed at advancing women into Ttraveled. In addition to practicing law, things,” she says. “Everything from decision-making roles. She followed both at a large law firm and as in-house compliance to legal to working on up in 2017 with Amplify Latinx, a counsel, she is an entrepreneur, an diversity and inclusion, as well as a non-profit whose mission is to increase angel investor and a business executive. whole host of other projects. I get to Latino economic and political power “As a disruptor and an innovator I’m wear my business hat and community in Massachusetts. The organization trying to take a different path in terms hat and investing hat, often at the same has grown to over 4,000 members, of creating opportunity,” she says. “I’m time.” 140 partners and $400,000 in annual really proud to be able to lead the way revenue. in getting involved in things that others “I’m really proud to She shares her expertise as a in my community haven’t been able to be able to lead the way member of several boards of directors, break into.” including Beth Israel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • STATISTICAL REPORTS Commissioner of Correction
    Public Document No. 115 Styr Olommonutfaltlf of fflasBarljuarîta STATISTICAL REPORTS OF THE Commissioner of Correction For The Y ear Ending December 31, 1967 P ublication of t h is D ocu m ent A pproved by A lfred C. H olland. State P urchasing A gent. 900-6 -69-949774 $.667 (Eommomuraltlj of HJaBHarljuBpttH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION 100 C ambridge Str eet, Boston, Mass. 02202 STATISTICAL REPORT OF THF COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION FOR, THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1967 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION JOHN A. GAVIN Commissioner Robert J. Moore, Deputy Commissioner for Institutional Services John J. Fitzpatrick, Deputy Commissioner for Classification and Treatment John A. Chmielinski, Deputy Commissioner for Personnel and Training Parole Board Joseph F. McCormack, Chairman Cornelius J. Twomey, Member John T. Lane, Member Mary P. Kirkpatrick, Member Tillie A. Z elesky, Member (Before June, 1967) L. Warren DeSaulnier, Member (Since June, 1967) 115 M /VC. P.D. 115 1 STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS INSTITUTION LOCATION Mass. Corr. Inst. Walpole........ South Walpole. Palmer Scafati, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Norfolk......... Norfolk........ Philip J. Picard, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Concord........ West Concord . James L. O'Shea, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Framingham . Framingham . Betty Cole Smith, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Bridgewater. South Bridgewater Charles W. Gaughan, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Plymouth . South Carver . James F. Mahoney, Jr. Mass. Corr. Inst. Monroe ......... Monroe ........ Director of Prison Camps Mass. Corr. Inst. Warwick........ Warwick........ 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, Mass. COUNTY JAILS AND HOUSES OF CORRECTION NOTE: Places marked with * are Jails only; those marked with a # are Houses of Correction only. COUNTY LOCATION Barnstable Barnstable................
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy for Better Implementation of Women's
    ADVOCACY FOR BETTER IMPLEMENTATION OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN GHANA July 2002 Publié dans – Published on : www.wildaf-ao.org ADVOCACY FOR BETTER IMPLEMENTATION OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN GHANA Women in Law and Development in Africa (WiLDAF) Ghana P.O.Box LG 488, Legon Accra Sub Offices : WiLDAF Western Region Legal Awareness Programme, P.O. Box 431, Takoradi WiLDAF Volta Region Legal Awareness Programme P.O Box MA310, Ho ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was developed as part of the project: “Sensitisation and Capacity Building of judicial and extrajudicial Stakeholders for sustainable implementation of Women’s’ Rights in West Africa”. WiLDAF -Ghana is, especially, indebted to the European Commission for its financial support which enabled WiLDAF to develop this valuable tool of sensitisation for non legal practitioners who participate in the implementation of women’s rights. WiLDAF also expresses its warm gratitude to all the people who, in one way or the other, contributed to the publishing of this document. Written by DORCAS COKER-APPIAH JOANA FOSTER Cover. Conceptualised by: WiLDAF West African Sub-regional Office, Togo. ( WASRO) Drawn by: Aldus Informatique, Lomé, Togo. Printed by YAMENS PRES LTD 233-32-223222 This document was prepared with the financial support of the European Community. The views hereby presented here are those of WiLDAF/FeDDAF and in no way reflects the official view of the European Community. Publié dans – Published on : www.wildaf-ao.org Contents Foreword .........................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Legal Juiced Season 5, Episode 11 Broadcast: December 1, 2008 Written By: Corinne Brinkerhoff & David E
    Boston Legal Juiced Season 5, Episode 11 Broadcast: December 1, 2008 Written By: Corinne Brinkerhoff & David E. Kelley Directed By: Michael R. Lohmann © 2008 David E. Kelley Productions. All Rights Reserved. Transcribed Imamess for Boston-Legal.org; Thanks to olucy for proofreading and Dana for pictures. At Crane, Poole and Schmidt, the elevator door rings, Margie Coggins steps off and seems to be looking for someone. Margie Coggins: Uh. She tries to get help from someone passing by. She is ignored and doesn't seem to know what to do next. Catherine Piper: She walks up. Hello, dear. May I help you? Margie Coggins: Yeah. I'm looking for a lawyer. Catherine Piper: Yes, I suspected as much. You're in a law firm. Uh, what have you done, dear? Margie Coggins: Well, I got into Harvard and then… Catherine Piper: A pretty little thing like you! Please! Who'd we do, sweetheart? Margie Coggins: Then they rescinded my admission. And now I would like to sue them. Catherine Piper: Of course you would. Uh…She grabs the hand of a person walking by and pulls her in. It's Katie Lloyd. Katie? Be a dear and help this young lady. Uh, Katie will help you, dear. Katie Lloyd: She looks at Catherine in puzzlement. To Margie. Why don't we go to the conference room? Still puzzled, Katie looks back at Catherine as she and Margie leave. Carl Sack: Hello. Catherine Piper: She turns. Ugh. And bumps into Carl. Carl Sack: Who are you? Catherine Piper: I'm Catherine, honey.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis (Gsia) Usaidlaos Legal Aid Support
    GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION ANALYSIS (GSIA) USAID LAOS LEGAL AID SUPPORT PROGRAM The Asia Foundation Vientiane, Lao PDR 26 July 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... i Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Laos Legal Aid Support Program................................................................................................... 1 1.2 This Report ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology and Coverage ................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Contextual Analysis ........................................................................................................................3 2.1 Gender Equality ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 BACKGROUND PAPER1 on ATTACKS AGAINST GIRLS SEEKING to ACCESS EDUCATION Table of Contents INTRODUCTION
    BACKGROUND PAPER1 ON ATTACKS AGAINST GIRLS SEEKING TO ACCESS EDUCATION Table of Contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 2 I. FRAMING THE PROBLEM .................................................................................. 4 II. THE APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORKS ON EDUCATION ......................................................................... 6 A. THE FOUR ‘AS’ FRAMEWORK ............................................................................... 8 B. RIGHTS THROUGH EDUCATION ............................................................................. 9 III. ATTACKS ON GIRLS’ EDUCATION IN SITUATIONS OF INSECURITY AND CRISIS............................................................................................................... 10 IV. CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF ATTACKS ON GIRLS’ EDUCATION ............................................................................................................. 14 A. CAUSES OF ATTACKS AGAINST GIRLS’ EDUCATION ............................................... 14 B. HUMAN RIGHTS CONSEQUENCES OF ATTACKS ON GIRLS’ EDUCATION ................... 17 V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 22 VI. RESOURCES ....................................................................................................... 28 1 This background paper will be presented to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination of against Women, to contribute to the
    [Show full text]
  • Power of Attorney
    Louisiana State University Law Center LSU Law Digital Commons Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2008 Power of Attorney Christine Corcos Louisiana State University Law Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Corcos, Christine, "Power of Attorney" (2008). Journal Articles. 220. https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/faculty_scholarship/220 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POWER OF ATTORNEY Christine A. Corcos * I. Opening Statements No doubt exists that the drama/farce 1 Ally McBeal , which ran on the Fox Television Network from 1997 to 2002 2, was a phenomenal success, at least during its middle years (1998-1999). 3 It sparked numerous fan websites in several countries 4 including one devoted to “fan fiction @5” (a genre in which devotees of a television series or film try their hands at writing scripts), various product spinoffs, 6 a series spinoff (Ally , a thirty minute version that * Associate Professor of Law, Louisiana State University Law Center. I wish to thank Darlene C. Goring, Associate Professor of Law, Louisiana State University Law Center, for her thoughtful reading of the manuscript and her cogent and helpful comments on its content and N. Greg Smith, Professor of Law, Louisiana State University Law Center, for helpful comments and discussion of ethical rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 39 Number 4 Summer 2005 pp.859-909 Summer 2005 Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Audrey Wolfson Latourette Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Audrey Wolfson Latourette, Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, 39 Val. U. L. Rev. 859 (2005). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol39/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Latourette: Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Conte SEX DISCRIMINATION IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION: HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES Audrey Wolfson Latourette* I. INTRODUCTION The legal and cultural barriers that confronted nineteenth century American women with respect to obtaining entrance to the legal profession were onerous. In an era in which religious mandates and cultural norms proscribed any role for women other than the proper sphere of mother and wife, and legal obstacles to owning property, voting, and keeping one’s wages existed, the notion that a woman would depart from the sanctity of the home and enter the combative and powerful legal profession was viewed as anathema. The male bastion of jurisprudence overwhelmingly rejected the idea that the weaker, submissive sex could successfully undertake legal training and competently engage in advocacy in a public arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Screen Courtrooms a Hit with Lawyers - Buffalo - Buffalo Business First
    9/18/2018 Small-screen courtrooms a hit with lawyers - Buffalo - Buffalo Business First MENU Account FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF [email protected] From the Buffalo Business First: https://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/news/2018/09/17/small-screen-courtrooms-a-hit-with-lawyers.html Small-screen courtrooms a hit with lawyers Sep 17, 2018, 6:00am EDT For many, TV shows are an escape from reality. For attorneys, that’s no different – even when they’re watching lawyers on TV. “Better Call Saul” is the latest in a long line of TV shows about the legal profession. A prequel to AMC’s “Breaking Bad,” the show stars Bob Odenkirk as a crooked-at-times attorney named Jimmy McGill. “He’s a likable guy and you like his character,” said Patrick Fitzsimmons, senior associate at Hodgson Russ LLP in Buffalo. “It’s a great show. I think it’s the one BEN LEUNER/AMC show compared to the others where it’s not about a big firm.” “Better Call Saul” puts a new spin on legal drama as the slippery Jimmy McGill (played by Bob Odenkirk) Also a fan is Michael Benz, an associate at HoganWillig who recently returned to builds his practice. his native Buffalo after working in the Philadelphia public defender’s office and in his own practice as a criminal defense attorney. “(Odenkirk’s character is) the classic defense attorney who will do anything to make a buck or help his client,” Benz said, adding that he often binge-watches shows with his wife, Carla, an attorney in the federal public defender’s office in Buffalo.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Trustees of The
    Public Document No. 24 FIFTY-NINTH ANNUAL EEPOET THE TRUSTEES The State Farm BRIDGEWATER, INCLUDING THE REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AND OF THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Yeab e:ndixg November 30, 1912. BOSTON: WEIGHT & POTTEE FEINTING CO., STATE PEINTEES, 18 Post Office Square. 1913. Approved by The State Board of Publication. CONTENTS. PAGE Trustees' Report, 7 Superintendent's Report, 11 Treasurer's Report, 14 Statistics, 20 Valuation, 26 Hospital Report (Prison and Almshouse), 27 Hospital Statistics (Prison and Almshouse), . .31 Hospital Report (Insane), 39 Hospital Statistics (Insane), 47 STATE FARM, BRIDGEWATER. TRUSTEES. JOHN B. TIVNAN, Chairman, Salem. PAYSON W. LYMAN, Secretary, Fall River. LEONARD HUNTRESS, M.D., Lowell. Mrs. HELEN R. SMITH, Newton. GALEN L. STONE, Brookline. JOHN W. COUGHLIN, M.D., Fall River. Mrs. NELLIE E. TALBOT, . Brookline. RESIDENT OFFICERS. HOLLIS M. BLACKSTONE, . Superintendent. HENRY J. STRANN, . Assistant Superintendent and Treasurer. J. ARTHUR TAYLOR, . Master. WALTER E. TEMPLE, . Deputy Master. ERNEST B. EMERSON, M.D., Resident Physician. BENJAMIN B. KASSON, M.D., Assistant Physician. MINOT W. GALE, M.D., Assistant Physician. ERNEST E. BACON, Farmer. WILLIAM J. TURNBULL, . Engineer. CONSULTING PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS TO THE HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT. CALVIN PRATT, M.D., Bridgewater. SAMUEL J. MIXTER, M.D., Boston. HENRY EHRLICH, M.D., Boston. WILLIAM F. KNOWLES, M.D., Boston. DANIEL FISKE JONES, M.D., Boston. ®l)e Commnntuealtl] of illa^sadjusettB. TRUSTEES' REPORT. To His Excellency the Governor and the Honorable Council. Obedient to statutory requirement, the trustees of the State Infirmary and the State Farm submit their fifty-ninth annual report as to the operation of the State Farm for the year ending Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Impact of Gender Equality Provisions and Constitutionmaking
    Mapping the Impact of Gender Equality Provisions and Constitutionmaking STUDENT WORKING PAPERS Penn Law Seminar on International Women’s Human Rights taught by Rangita de Silva de Alwis, Associate Dean of International Programs Report presented to UN Women and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on May 6, 2016 MAPPING THE IMPACT OF GENDER EQUALITY PROVISIONS IN CONSTITUTIONS IN EMERGING DEMOCRACIES AND POST- CONFLICT INTRODUCTION The Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination of All Forms Against Women (CEDAW) and Security Council Resolution 1325 inspired us to examine the impact of constitutional gender equality provisions on women’s participation and legal protection. The United Nations General Assembly passed the CEDAW in 1979, and, since then, it has seen almost universal acceptance. The CEDAW brought and continues to bring critical attention to the importance of women’s international human rights and provides a framework for states to use in formulating national and local legislation that can and will protect those rights. Additionally, the Security Council Resolution 1325, passed in 2000, rallied all member states to recommit to bringing more women to the table in order to create, prevent, and ensure long lasting peace and tranquility. The Resolution called for women’s participation and protection to be at the forefront of each and every national and international agenda. Resolution 1325 led to subsequent resolutions, including 1820 and 2122, all of which advance women’s empowerment at the international level, and, with a top-down approach, aim to improve the lives of women all around the world. However, in order to have the most significant impact, the CEDAW and Resolution 1325 must be implemented domestically.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesbian Perspective, Lesbian Experience, and the Risk of Essentialism Patricia A
    Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1994 Lesbian Perspective, Lesbian Experience, and the Risk of Essentialism Patricia A. Cain Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs Recommended Citation 2 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 43 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LESBIAN PERSPECTIVE, LESBIAN EXPERIENCE, AND THE RISK OF ESSENTIALISM Patricia A. Cain* INTRODUCTION In the spring of 1989 at the 20th National Conference on Women and the Law, I made a plea for feminist legal theorists to consider les- bian perspective and experience in the formulation of their theories.' I argued that ignoring the reality of our (i.e., lesbians') different experi- ence is to fall into the "essentialist trap."'2 In other words, I believed then, as I do now, that it is dangerous to build grand or totalizing feminist theory from the perspective of only a few women. Two important things have happened since I gave that speech: (1) some people have told me that they perceived my project as one de- signed to uncover the "essential lesbian" and add her voice to the building of feminist legal theory; and (2) other people, including les- bian lawyers and academics, have pushed far beyond my 1989 chal- lenge and are working on the development of a lesbian legal theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston a Guide Book to the City and Vicinity
    1928 Tufts College Library GIFT OF ALUMNI BOSTON A GUIDE BOOK TO THE CITY AND VICINITY BY EDWIN M. BACON REVISED BY LeROY PHILLIPS GINN AND COMPANY BOSTON • NEW YORK • CHICAGO • LONDON ATLANTA • DALLAS • COLUMBUS • SAN FRANCISCO COPYRIGHT, 1928, BY GINN AND COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 328.1 (Cfte gtftengum ^regg GINN AND COMPANY • PRO- PRIETORS . BOSTON • U.S.A. CONTENTS PAGE PAGE Introductory vii Brookline, Newton, and The Way about Town ... vii Wellesley 122 Watertown and Waltham . "123 1. Modern Boston i Milton, the Blue Hills, Historical Sketch i Quincy, and Dedham . 124 Boston Proper 2 Winthrop and Revere . 127 1. The Central District . 4 Chelsea and Everett ... 127 2. The North End .... 57 Somerville, Medford, and 3. The Charlestown District 68 Winchester 128 4. The West End 71 5. The Back Bay District . 78 III. Public Parks 130 6. The Park Square District Metropolitan System . 130 and the South End . loi Boston City System ... 132 7. The Outlying Districts . 103 IV. Day Trips from Boston . 134 East Boston 103 Lexington and Concord . 134 South Boston .... 103 Boston Harbor and Massa- Roxbury District ... 105 chusetts Bay 139 West Roxbury District 105 The North Shore 141 Dorchester District . 107 The South Shore 143 Brighton District. 107 Park District . Hyde 107 Motor Sight-Seeing Trips . 146 n. The Metropolitan Region 108 Important Points of Interest 147 Cambridge and Harvard . 108 Index 153 MAPS PAGE PAGE Back Bay District, Showing Copley Square and Vicinity . 86 Connections with Down-Town Cambridge in the Vicinity of Boston vii Harvard University ...
    [Show full text]